Number of words that can be made using all the letters of the word W, if Os as well as Is are separated is?












4












$begingroup$


enter image description here



I am facing difficulty in solving the 18th Question from the above passage.



Attempt:



I have attempted it using principal of inclusion and exclusion.



Let n be the required number of ways.



$n = text{Total number of ways - Number of ways in which Os and Is are together}$



$implies n = dfrac{12!}{3!2!2!} - dfrac{11!}{2!3!} - dfrac{10!}{2!2!}+ dfrac{9!2!}{2!} = 399 times 8!$



This gives $N = 399$ which is wrong. Can you please tell me why am I getting the wrong answer?






combinatorics permutations combinations







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How do you know that your solution is wrong? There is also option (D)
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertZ answer given is option B
    $endgroup$
    – Abcd
    1 hour ago
















4












$begingroup$


enter image description here



I am facing difficulty in solving the 18th Question from the above passage.



Attempt:



I have attempted it using principal of inclusion and exclusion.



Let n be the required number of ways.



$n = text{Total number of ways - Number of ways in which Os and Is are together}$



$implies n = dfrac{12!}{3!2!2!} - dfrac{11!}{2!3!} - dfrac{10!}{2!2!}+ dfrac{9!2!}{2!} = 399 times 8!$



This gives $N = 399$ which is wrong. Can you please tell me why am I getting the wrong answer?






combinatorics permutations combinations







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How do you know that your solution is wrong? There is also option (D)
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertZ answer given is option B
    $endgroup$
    – Abcd
    1 hour ago














4












4








4





$begingroup$


enter image description here



I am facing difficulty in solving the 18th Question from the above passage.



Attempt:



I have attempted it using principal of inclusion and exclusion.



Let n be the required number of ways.



$n = text{Total number of ways - Number of ways in which Os and Is are together}$



$implies n = dfrac{12!}{3!2!2!} - dfrac{11!}{2!3!} - dfrac{10!}{2!2!}+ dfrac{9!2!}{2!} = 399 times 8!$



This gives $N = 399$ which is wrong. Can you please tell me why am I getting the wrong answer?






combinatorics permutations combinations







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




enter image description here



I am facing difficulty in solving the 18th Question from the above passage.



Attempt:



I have attempted it using principal of inclusion and exclusion.



Let n be the required number of ways.



$n = text{Total number of ways - Number of ways in which Os and Is are together}$



$implies n = dfrac{12!}{3!2!2!} - dfrac{11!}{2!3!} - dfrac{10!}{2!2!}+ dfrac{9!2!}{2!} = 399 times 8!$



This gives $N = 399$ which is wrong. Can you please tell me why am I getting the wrong answer?






combinatorics permutations combinations




combinatorics permutations combinations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









AbcdAbcd

3,08931337




3,08931337












  • $begingroup$
    How do you know that your solution is wrong? There is also option (D)
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertZ answer given is option B
    $endgroup$
    – Abcd
    1 hour ago


















  • $begingroup$
    How do you know that your solution is wrong? There is also option (D)
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertZ answer given is option B
    $endgroup$
    – Abcd
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
How do you know that your solution is wrong? There is also option (D)
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
How do you know that your solution is wrong? There is also option (D)
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@RobertZ answer given is option B
$endgroup$
– Abcd
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@RobertZ answer given is option B
$endgroup$
– Abcd
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Your mistake is not noticing that the I's can be non-separated two different ways: We can have all three of them together as III, but we can also have II in one place and I in another.



One way to calculate how many ways this can happen is to think of one pair II as a single letter, and the third I as a separate letter, and count the number of words we can make. This will count each III case twice: Once as I II, and once as II I. So we have to subtract the number of such cases once.



With this correction, the final calculation becomes
$$
overbrace{frac{12!}{3!2!2!}}^{text{All words}} - overbrace{frac{11!}{3!2!}}^{text{O's not separate}} - overbrace{left(underbrace{frac{11!}{2!2!}}_{text{II and I}} - underbrace{frac{10!}{2!2!}}_{text{III}}right)}^{text{I's not separate}} + overbrace{left(underbrace{frac{10!}{2!}}_{text{OO, II and I}} - underbrace{frac{9!}{2!}}_{text{OO and III}}right)}^{text{Neither O's nor I's separate}}
$$
which turns out to be $8!cdot 228$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer I have understood my mistake, but I am unable to understand the final equation in your answer. Can you label the terms like which term stands for which case?
    $endgroup$
    – Abcd
    32 mins ago












  • $begingroup$
    @Abcd I added a short explanation for what each term represents. The basic structure of your inclusion-exclusion calculation is still there, just with the two last terms corrected to make up for the mistake.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    21 mins ago





















2












$begingroup$

The letter $I$ appears three times. You have calculated the number of ways to arrange the letters so that the three copies of $I$ aren't all in the same place (and also the two $O$s are separated). However, "separated" here means that no two of them are together. Your count includes such "words" as STIILOCATINO, which should be excluded.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    How did you get each of the terms of $n$?




    • $frac{12!}{3!2!2!}$ : The number of ways of arranging the letters of SOLICITATION.


    • $frac{11!}{2!3!}$ : The number of ways in which the two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


    • $frac{10!}{2!2!}$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


    • $frac{9!2!}{2!}$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s and two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.



    Well , the problem is this : the complement of this case, also includes the case where two $I$s can be together and the third can be separate. You have not neglected this case, and that's why you have an answer larger than the given answer.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165573%2fnumber-of-words-that-can-be-made-using-all-the-letters-of-the-word-w-if-os-as-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      Your mistake is not noticing that the I's can be non-separated two different ways: We can have all three of them together as III, but we can also have II in one place and I in another.



      One way to calculate how many ways this can happen is to think of one pair II as a single letter, and the third I as a separate letter, and count the number of words we can make. This will count each III case twice: Once as I II, and once as II I. So we have to subtract the number of such cases once.



      With this correction, the final calculation becomes
      $$
      overbrace{frac{12!}{3!2!2!}}^{text{All words}} - overbrace{frac{11!}{3!2!}}^{text{O's not separate}} - overbrace{left(underbrace{frac{11!}{2!2!}}_{text{II and I}} - underbrace{frac{10!}{2!2!}}_{text{III}}right)}^{text{I's not separate}} + overbrace{left(underbrace{frac{10!}{2!}}_{text{OO, II and I}} - underbrace{frac{9!}{2!}}_{text{OO and III}}right)}^{text{Neither O's nor I's separate}}
      $$
      which turns out to be $8!cdot 228$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Thanks for the answer I have understood my mistake, but I am unable to understand the final equation in your answer. Can you label the terms like which term stands for which case?
        $endgroup$
        – Abcd
        32 mins ago












      • $begingroup$
        @Abcd I added a short explanation for what each term represents. The basic structure of your inclusion-exclusion calculation is still there, just with the two last terms corrected to make up for the mistake.
        $endgroup$
        – Arthur
        21 mins ago


















      4












      $begingroup$

      Your mistake is not noticing that the I's can be non-separated two different ways: We can have all three of them together as III, but we can also have II in one place and I in another.



      One way to calculate how many ways this can happen is to think of one pair II as a single letter, and the third I as a separate letter, and count the number of words we can make. This will count each III case twice: Once as I II, and once as II I. So we have to subtract the number of such cases once.



      With this correction, the final calculation becomes
      $$
      overbrace{frac{12!}{3!2!2!}}^{text{All words}} - overbrace{frac{11!}{3!2!}}^{text{O's not separate}} - overbrace{left(underbrace{frac{11!}{2!2!}}_{text{II and I}} - underbrace{frac{10!}{2!2!}}_{text{III}}right)}^{text{I's not separate}} + overbrace{left(underbrace{frac{10!}{2!}}_{text{OO, II and I}} - underbrace{frac{9!}{2!}}_{text{OO and III}}right)}^{text{Neither O's nor I's separate}}
      $$
      which turns out to be $8!cdot 228$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Thanks for the answer I have understood my mistake, but I am unable to understand the final equation in your answer. Can you label the terms like which term stands for which case?
        $endgroup$
        – Abcd
        32 mins ago












      • $begingroup$
        @Abcd I added a short explanation for what each term represents. The basic structure of your inclusion-exclusion calculation is still there, just with the two last terms corrected to make up for the mistake.
        $endgroup$
        – Arthur
        21 mins ago
















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$

      Your mistake is not noticing that the I's can be non-separated two different ways: We can have all three of them together as III, but we can also have II in one place and I in another.



      One way to calculate how many ways this can happen is to think of one pair II as a single letter, and the third I as a separate letter, and count the number of words we can make. This will count each III case twice: Once as I II, and once as II I. So we have to subtract the number of such cases once.



      With this correction, the final calculation becomes
      $$
      overbrace{frac{12!}{3!2!2!}}^{text{All words}} - overbrace{frac{11!}{3!2!}}^{text{O's not separate}} - overbrace{left(underbrace{frac{11!}{2!2!}}_{text{II and I}} - underbrace{frac{10!}{2!2!}}_{text{III}}right)}^{text{I's not separate}} + overbrace{left(underbrace{frac{10!}{2!}}_{text{OO, II and I}} - underbrace{frac{9!}{2!}}_{text{OO and III}}right)}^{text{Neither O's nor I's separate}}
      $$
      which turns out to be $8!cdot 228$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Your mistake is not noticing that the I's can be non-separated two different ways: We can have all three of them together as III, but we can also have II in one place and I in another.



      One way to calculate how many ways this can happen is to think of one pair II as a single letter, and the third I as a separate letter, and count the number of words we can make. This will count each III case twice: Once as I II, and once as II I. So we have to subtract the number of such cases once.



      With this correction, the final calculation becomes
      $$
      overbrace{frac{12!}{3!2!2!}}^{text{All words}} - overbrace{frac{11!}{3!2!}}^{text{O's not separate}} - overbrace{left(underbrace{frac{11!}{2!2!}}_{text{II and I}} - underbrace{frac{10!}{2!2!}}_{text{III}}right)}^{text{I's not separate}} + overbrace{left(underbrace{frac{10!}{2!}}_{text{OO, II and I}} - underbrace{frac{9!}{2!}}_{text{OO and III}}right)}^{text{Neither O's nor I's separate}}
      $$
      which turns out to be $8!cdot 228$.







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited 21 mins ago

























      answered 1 hour ago









      ArthurArthur

      120k7120204




      120k7120204












      • $begingroup$
        Thanks for the answer I have understood my mistake, but I am unable to understand the final equation in your answer. Can you label the terms like which term stands for which case?
        $endgroup$
        – Abcd
        32 mins ago












      • $begingroup$
        @Abcd I added a short explanation for what each term represents. The basic structure of your inclusion-exclusion calculation is still there, just with the two last terms corrected to make up for the mistake.
        $endgroup$
        – Arthur
        21 mins ago




















      • $begingroup$
        Thanks for the answer I have understood my mistake, but I am unable to understand the final equation in your answer. Can you label the terms like which term stands for which case?
        $endgroup$
        – Abcd
        32 mins ago












      • $begingroup$
        @Abcd I added a short explanation for what each term represents. The basic structure of your inclusion-exclusion calculation is still there, just with the two last terms corrected to make up for the mistake.
        $endgroup$
        – Arthur
        21 mins ago


















      $begingroup$
      Thanks for the answer I have understood my mistake, but I am unable to understand the final equation in your answer. Can you label the terms like which term stands for which case?
      $endgroup$
      – Abcd
      32 mins ago






      $begingroup$
      Thanks for the answer I have understood my mistake, but I am unable to understand the final equation in your answer. Can you label the terms like which term stands for which case?
      $endgroup$
      – Abcd
      32 mins ago














      $begingroup$
      @Abcd I added a short explanation for what each term represents. The basic structure of your inclusion-exclusion calculation is still there, just with the two last terms corrected to make up for the mistake.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      21 mins ago






      $begingroup$
      @Abcd I added a short explanation for what each term represents. The basic structure of your inclusion-exclusion calculation is still there, just with the two last terms corrected to make up for the mistake.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      21 mins ago













      2












      $begingroup$

      The letter $I$ appears three times. You have calculated the number of ways to arrange the letters so that the three copies of $I$ aren't all in the same place (and also the two $O$s are separated). However, "separated" here means that no two of them are together. Your count includes such "words" as STIILOCATINO, which should be excluded.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        2












        $begingroup$

        The letter $I$ appears three times. You have calculated the number of ways to arrange the letters so that the three copies of $I$ aren't all in the same place (and also the two $O$s are separated). However, "separated" here means that no two of them are together. Your count includes such "words" as STIILOCATINO, which should be excluded.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          The letter $I$ appears three times. You have calculated the number of ways to arrange the letters so that the three copies of $I$ aren't all in the same place (and also the two $O$s are separated). However, "separated" here means that no two of them are together. Your count includes such "words" as STIILOCATINO, which should be excluded.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The letter $I$ appears three times. You have calculated the number of ways to arrange the letters so that the three copies of $I$ aren't all in the same place (and also the two $O$s are separated). However, "separated" here means that no two of them are together. Your count includes such "words" as STIILOCATINO, which should be excluded.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          jmerryjmerry

          16.6k11633




          16.6k11633























              2












              $begingroup$

              How did you get each of the terms of $n$?




              • $frac{12!}{3!2!2!}$ : The number of ways of arranging the letters of SOLICITATION.


              • $frac{11!}{2!3!}$ : The number of ways in which the two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


              • $frac{10!}{2!2!}$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


              • $frac{9!2!}{2!}$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s and two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.



              Well , the problem is this : the complement of this case, also includes the case where two $I$s can be together and the third can be separate. You have not neglected this case, and that's why you have an answer larger than the given answer.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                How did you get each of the terms of $n$?




                • $frac{12!}{3!2!2!}$ : The number of ways of arranging the letters of SOLICITATION.


                • $frac{11!}{2!3!}$ : The number of ways in which the two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                • $frac{10!}{2!2!}$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                • $frac{9!2!}{2!}$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s and two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.



                Well , the problem is this : the complement of this case, also includes the case where two $I$s can be together and the third can be separate. You have not neglected this case, and that's why you have an answer larger than the given answer.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  How did you get each of the terms of $n$?




                  • $frac{12!}{3!2!2!}$ : The number of ways of arranging the letters of SOLICITATION.


                  • $frac{11!}{2!3!}$ : The number of ways in which the two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                  • $frac{10!}{2!2!}$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                  • $frac{9!2!}{2!}$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s and two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.



                  Well , the problem is this : the complement of this case, also includes the case where two $I$s can be together and the third can be separate. You have not neglected this case, and that's why you have an answer larger than the given answer.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  How did you get each of the terms of $n$?




                  • $frac{12!}{3!2!2!}$ : The number of ways of arranging the letters of SOLICITATION.


                  • $frac{11!}{2!3!}$ : The number of ways in which the two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                  • $frac{10!}{2!2!}$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s can be together in SOLICITATION.


                  • $frac{9!2!}{2!}$ : The number of ways in which the three $I$s and two $O$s can be together in SOLICITATION.



                  Well , the problem is this : the complement of this case, also includes the case where two $I$s can be together and the third can be separate. You have not neglected this case, and that's why you have an answer larger than the given answer.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  астон вілла олоф мэллбэргастон вілла олоф мэллбэрг

                  40k33477




                  40k33477






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165573%2fnumber-of-words-that-can-be-made-using-all-the-letters-of-the-word-w-if-os-as-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                      Image
                      FæreyjarHestar færeyskahjaltlandshestinumíslenski hesturinnBretlandskolanámumenskuWikipediafæreyskuWikipediaRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeysku Færeyskur hestur Úr Wikipediu, frjálsa alfræðiritinu Jump to navigation Jump to search Rani og Grani. Grani í vetrarfeldi. Færeyski hesturinn (færeyska: Føroyska rossið ) er hestur sem hefur lifað í Færeyjum í hundruði ára. Hann er smágerður, 120-132 cm á hæð, og helst skyldur hjaltlandshestinum. Hlutverk hans var að draga vagna og plóg og bera klyfjar. Hann hefur fjórar gangtegundir eins og íslenski hesturinn (þar með talið tölt) og er með fjölda litaafbrigði. Nú til dags er hann notaður til frístunda. Í lok 19. aldar voru til um 800 hross. Mö...
                      Read more

                      He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                      Image
                      Engineer refusing to file/disclose patents Extending the spectral theorem for bounded self adjoint operators to bounded normal operators Do varchar(max), nvarchar(max) and varbinary(max) columns affect select queries? Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note? What linear sensor for a keyboard? Why don’t women say שלא עשני גויה and שפחה, according to Ashkenazim? Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets? anything or something to eat Query about absorption line spectra Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship? Fuse symbol on toroidal transformer Create all possible words using a set or letters Does the Mind Blank spell prevent the target from being frightened? Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face? When quoting, must I also copy hyphens used to divide words that continue on the next line? ...
                      Read more

                      Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029

                      Image
                      SlayerMusikgrupper bildade 1981Amerikanska thrash metal-grupper amerikansktthrash metalHuntington Park1981gitarristernaJeff HannemanKerry KingbasistenTom ArayatrummisenDave LombardoGary HoltPaul Bostaphcertifierats med guldMetallicaAnthraxMegadeththrash metal1986extrema metalgenrerdeath metal22 januari2018USAKanadaEuropaHuntington ParkKalifornien1981gitarristernaJeff HannemanKerry KingbassångDave Lombardoheavy metalbrittiskaIron MaidenJudas PriestthrashMetallicaRattSteeler1982demoundergroundMetal Blade1983high schoolGene HoglanDeathStrapping Young Ladkassettvinyl1984LondonMarquee Club1984Eldorado StudiosTrack Record StudiosLos Angelesmastrade1985CDCombat Recordsextreme metalVenomExodusStudio 54 club1985VHSCombat RecordsBelgienUFORick RubinDef Jam Recordship hoprockakterThe Black CrowesRun–D.M.C.LL Cool JBeastie BoysthrashbpmAngel of DeathRaining BloodAndy WallaceHowie Weinberg1986bildskivaBillboard 200RIAAMetal HammerKerrang!Angela Gossowdeath metalArch Enemythrash metalOverk...
                      Read more