Are there languages with no euphemisms?
I feel that euphemisms are a function of how society views certain aspects of life and feels that they should not be talked about directly. So are there languages with no euphemisms?
semantics sociolinguistics
asked 2 hours ago
Ishan UpadhyayIshan Upadhyay
233
add a comment |
I feel that euphemisms are a function of how society views certain aspects of life and feels that they should not be talked about directly. So are there languages with no euphemisms?
semantics sociolinguistics
asked 2 hours ago
Ishan UpadhyayIshan Upadhyay
233
add a comment |
I feel that euphemisms are a function of how society views certain aspects of life and feels that they should not be talked about directly. So are there languages with no euphemisms?
semantics sociolinguistics
asked 2 hours ago
Ishan UpadhyayIshan Upadhyay
233
I feel that euphemisms are a function of how society views certain aspects of life and feels that they should not be talked about directly. So are there languages with no euphemisms?
semantics sociolinguistics
semantics sociolinguistics
asked 2 hours ago
Ishan UpadhyayIshan Upadhyay
233
asked 2 hours ago
Ishan UpadhyayIshan Upadhyay
233
asked 2 hours ago
Ishan UpadhyayIshan Upadhyay
233
asked 2 hours ago
Ishan UpadhyayIshan Upadhyay
233
asked 2 hours ago
Ishan UpadhyayIshan Upadhyay
233
233
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here
As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.
Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.
answered 48 mins ago
WiccanKarnakWiccanKarnak
8451422
add a comment |
It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".
But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.
The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.
answered 1 hour ago
WilsonWilson
1,826520
2
"Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)
– Luke Sawczak
49 mins ago
Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?
– Wilson
47 mins ago
I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)
– Luke Sawczak
43 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "312"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30990%2fare-there-languages-with-no-euphemisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here
As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.
Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.
answered 48 mins ago
WiccanKarnakWiccanKarnak
8451422
add a comment |
Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here
As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.
Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.
answered 48 mins ago
WiccanKarnakWiccanKarnak
8451422
add a comment |
Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here
As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.
Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.
answered 48 mins ago
WiccanKarnakWiccanKarnak
8451422
Their presence across all known world languages constitutes a linguistic universal according to research from Allan and Burridge (1991)
Refer to this article here. And to this paper, here
As @Wilson interestingly points out, it's not easy to say, "There exists one", also because, where do you draw a line and say this particular saying is not a Euphemism for something slightly more taboo. Since there is no scale, no definite measure. All languages will mostly have some sort of euphemism construction.
Unless they are artificial languages or very specific dialects (like in a precision field like surgery), where you have to be totally clear about the point you are making and slight confusion can make a lot of deprecation.
answered 48 mins ago
WiccanKarnakWiccanKarnak
8451422
answered 48 mins ago
WiccanKarnakWiccanKarnak
8451422
answered 48 mins ago
WiccanKarnakWiccanKarnak
8451422
answered 48 mins ago
WiccanKarnakWiccanKarnak
8451422
8451422
add a comment |
add a comment |
It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".
But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.
The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.
answered 1 hour ago
WilsonWilson
1,826520
2
"Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)
– Luke Sawczak
49 mins ago
Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?
– Wilson
47 mins ago
I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)
– Luke Sawczak
43 mins ago
add a comment |
It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".
But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.
The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.
answered 1 hour ago
WilsonWilson
1,826520
2
"Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)
– Luke Sawczak
49 mins ago
Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?
– Wilson
47 mins ago
I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)
– Luke Sawczak
43 mins ago
add a comment |
It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".
But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.
The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.
answered 1 hour ago
WilsonWilson
1,826520
It's hard to answer a question with a definite negative, since that leaves the possibility open for someone to come along later and say, "I know an example which disproves your position".
But I think that naturally occurring human languages are all going to have euphemisms, since humans seem to like that.
The only languages I know which do not have euphemisms are ones which are designed to be unambiguous. They include Lojban and SQL.
answered 1 hour ago
WilsonWilson
1,826520
answered 1 hour ago
WilsonWilson
1,826520
answered 1 hour ago
WilsonWilson
1,826520
answered 1 hour ago
WilsonWilson
1,826520
1,826520
2
"Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)
– Luke Sawczak
49 mins ago
Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?
– Wilson
47 mins ago
I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)
– Luke Sawczak
43 mins ago
add a comment |
2
"Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)
– Luke Sawczak
49 mins ago
Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?
– Wilson
47 mins ago
I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)
– Luke Sawczak
43 mins ago
2
2
"Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)
– Luke Sawczak
49 mins ago
"Little Johnny Lobjan never uses euphemisms," said the teacher. "He's so... so... unambiguous." :)
– Luke Sawczak
49 mins ago
Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?
– Wilson
47 mins ago
Of course a euphemism is kind of an ambiguity, right? As in, is she actually powdering her nose or has she really gone for a slash like everyone believes?
– Wilson
47 mins ago
I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)
– Luke Sawczak
43 mins ago
I suppose that's true, though it's an interesting ambiguity, not so much between propositions as between discourse acts; you could say it's a social rather than a linguistic structure that introduces the ambiguity. In any case, my comment above was just for a laugh, turning "unambiguous" itself into a euphemism :)
– Luke Sawczak
43 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Linguistics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30990%2fare-there-languages-with-no-euphemisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
