Multiple OR (||) Conditions in If Statement





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1















Can anyone explain why the following If statement does not work with multiple OR conditions. The goal is when this trigger runs, if the user's Id who is updating the record is not equal to a specific Id, then an error is thrown. The If clause works only when I compare the current user's Id with a single specific Id.



    String currentUserId = UserInfo.getUserId();

if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') {
Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');
}


{EDIT} FYI: I know I can accomplish this by using the following code, but I am curious as to why the OR operator is not working as I had expected.



    if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX') {
if (currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY') {
if (currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') {
Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');
}
}
}









share|improve this question































    1















    Can anyone explain why the following If statement does not work with multiple OR conditions. The goal is when this trigger runs, if the user's Id who is updating the record is not equal to a specific Id, then an error is thrown. The If clause works only when I compare the current user's Id with a single specific Id.



        String currentUserId = UserInfo.getUserId();

    if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') {
    Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');
    }


    {EDIT} FYI: I know I can accomplish this by using the following code, but I am curious as to why the OR operator is not working as I had expected.



        if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX') {
    if (currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY') {
    if (currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') {
    Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');
    }
    }
    }









    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1








      Can anyone explain why the following If statement does not work with multiple OR conditions. The goal is when this trigger runs, if the user's Id who is updating the record is not equal to a specific Id, then an error is thrown. The If clause works only when I compare the current user's Id with a single specific Id.



          String currentUserId = UserInfo.getUserId();

      if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') {
      Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');
      }


      {EDIT} FYI: I know I can accomplish this by using the following code, but I am curious as to why the OR operator is not working as I had expected.



          if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX') {
      if (currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY') {
      if (currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') {
      Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');
      }
      }
      }









      share|improve this question
















      Can anyone explain why the following If statement does not work with multiple OR conditions. The goal is when this trigger runs, if the user's Id who is updating the record is not equal to a specific Id, then an error is thrown. The If clause works only when I compare the current user's Id with a single specific Id.



          String currentUserId = UserInfo.getUserId();

      if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') {
      Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');
      }


      {EDIT} FYI: I know I can accomplish this by using the following code, but I am curious as to why the OR operator is not working as I had expected.



          if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX') {
      if (currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY') {
      if (currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') {
      Trigger.new[0].addError('Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field');
      }
      }
      }






      apex trigger if






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 18 at 16:42







      Max Goldfarb

















      asked Apr 18 at 16:38









      Max GoldfarbMax Goldfarb

      134




      134






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          "OR" means "true if either value is true". If the ID is "XXXXXXXXX", for example, it will NOT be "YYYYYYYYY", therefore OR will result in a true value. You need to use "AND" (&&) instead, meaning "true only if both values are true."





          Side note: It's not enough to just put an error on Trigger.new[0]; there may be multiple records in the trigger context, and this can result in a "too many retries" error during bulk data operations.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Maybe my logic is incorrect, but I believe do want "true if either [any] value is true" and not "true only if both values are true." Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I use the && operator than the error will be thrown only if the User's Id is equal to XXXXXXXXX, YYYYYYYYY, AND ZZZZZZZZZ?

            – Max Goldfarb
            Apr 18 at 16:44











          • Then use == instead of != in your comparison.

            – Sebastian Kessel
            Apr 18 at 16:46











          • That'd mean If the user is EQUAL to X OR Y OR Z. You have it written as if the user is DIFFERENT to X OR Y OR Z

            – Sebastian Kessel
            Apr 18 at 16:48






          • 2





            @MaxGoldfarb You'll want to look at de Morgan's Laws. If the user Id must be one of three values, you would say "Id is equal to XXXXX OR YYYYY OR ZZZZZ".

            – sfdcfox
            Apr 18 at 16:52











          • Awesome thanks for your help guys, I really appreciate it, @sfdcfox using the && operator seems to satisfy my requirements from my brief testing. Again, really appreciate you guys/girls help!

            – Max Goldfarb
            Apr 18 at 16:55



















          1














          @sfdcfox is correct, Although I would do a



          !( (new List<String>{'XXXX','YYYY','ZZZZ'}).contains(currentUserId) )


          Chaining a bunch of Logical OR's gets messy, especially if you need to add to the list in the future. I would make a public static variable of it to describe the classes permission if you plan on using that permission group you have there in more than one place.






          share|improve this answer
























          • That's a really good idea, will probably do this. Thanks!

            – Max Goldfarb
            Apr 18 at 16:59











          • If you want also you could make a property of the class and say something like Class.UserIsInAdminGroup

            – Zach Hutchins
            Apr 18 at 17:01











          • I would look into this ticket if you are planning on using List<Id> salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/224490/…. Theres a reason i use string because salesforce fixing things won't come in your or my lifetime

            – Zach Hutchins
            Apr 18 at 17:14



















          1














          In programming,



          if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') {}


          means that, if at least any of the 3 conditions is TRUE, the full expression is TRUE.



          For a currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', the expression is evaluated as




          currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' ==> FALSE

          currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' ==> TRUE

          currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ' ==> TRUE




          So, for currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', it adds the error Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field, which is not desirable.



          It can be explained by De Morgan's Law.




          Not (A and B) is the same as Not A or Not B.



          Not (A or B) is the same as Not A and Not B.




          In your case,




          currentUserId NOT ('XXXXXXXXX' OR 'YYYYYYYYY' OR 'ZZZZZZZZZ')




          which can be written as




          currentUserId NOT 'XXXXXXXXX' AND currentUserId NOT 'YYYYYYYYY' AND currentUserId NOT 'ZZZZZZZZZ'







          share|improve this answer































            1














            While your logic will always return true because the value is always not one of the three values, correcting this code by inverting || to && would be missing the point that there is a better way to filter logic so it is specific to a subset of users. The two most ideal ways to code for this so that it is configurable are Custom Permissions and Hierarchy Custom Settings.



            Custom Permissions




            1. Create a Custom Permission named e.g. CanDoOperationX.

            2. Create a Permission Set which contains only this permission.

            3. Assign this Permission Set to each User in your whitelist.

            4. Update your condition to check FeatureManagement.checkPermission('CanDoOperationX')


            Hierarchy Custom Setting



            This option doesn't make as much sense unless you have other user specific overrides for this functionality, but it is certainly viable.




            1. Create a Hierarchy Custom Setting named e.g. MyTriggerSettings.

            2. Add a Checkbox field named e.g. Can_Do_Operation_X__c.

            3. Create a new record in this setting for each User in your whitelist.

            4. Update your condition to check $MyTriggerSettings__c.getInstance().Can_Do_Operation_X__c.






            share|improve this answer
























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "459"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f258350%2fmultiple-or-conditions-in-if-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2














              "OR" means "true if either value is true". If the ID is "XXXXXXXXX", for example, it will NOT be "YYYYYYYYY", therefore OR will result in a true value. You need to use "AND" (&&) instead, meaning "true only if both values are true."





              Side note: It's not enough to just put an error on Trigger.new[0]; there may be multiple records in the trigger context, and this can result in a "too many retries" error during bulk data operations.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Maybe my logic is incorrect, but I believe do want "true if either [any] value is true" and not "true only if both values are true." Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I use the && operator than the error will be thrown only if the User's Id is equal to XXXXXXXXX, YYYYYYYYY, AND ZZZZZZZZZ?

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:44











              • Then use == instead of != in your comparison.

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:46











              • That'd mean If the user is EQUAL to X OR Y OR Z. You have it written as if the user is DIFFERENT to X OR Y OR Z

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:48






              • 2





                @MaxGoldfarb You'll want to look at de Morgan's Laws. If the user Id must be one of three values, you would say "Id is equal to XXXXX OR YYYYY OR ZZZZZ".

                – sfdcfox
                Apr 18 at 16:52











              • Awesome thanks for your help guys, I really appreciate it, @sfdcfox using the && operator seems to satisfy my requirements from my brief testing. Again, really appreciate you guys/girls help!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:55
















              2














              "OR" means "true if either value is true". If the ID is "XXXXXXXXX", for example, it will NOT be "YYYYYYYYY", therefore OR will result in a true value. You need to use "AND" (&&) instead, meaning "true only if both values are true."





              Side note: It's not enough to just put an error on Trigger.new[0]; there may be multiple records in the trigger context, and this can result in a "too many retries" error during bulk data operations.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Maybe my logic is incorrect, but I believe do want "true if either [any] value is true" and not "true only if both values are true." Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I use the && operator than the error will be thrown only if the User's Id is equal to XXXXXXXXX, YYYYYYYYY, AND ZZZZZZZZZ?

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:44











              • Then use == instead of != in your comparison.

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:46











              • That'd mean If the user is EQUAL to X OR Y OR Z. You have it written as if the user is DIFFERENT to X OR Y OR Z

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:48






              • 2





                @MaxGoldfarb You'll want to look at de Morgan's Laws. If the user Id must be one of three values, you would say "Id is equal to XXXXX OR YYYYY OR ZZZZZ".

                – sfdcfox
                Apr 18 at 16:52











              • Awesome thanks for your help guys, I really appreciate it, @sfdcfox using the && operator seems to satisfy my requirements from my brief testing. Again, really appreciate you guys/girls help!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:55














              2












              2








              2







              "OR" means "true if either value is true". If the ID is "XXXXXXXXX", for example, it will NOT be "YYYYYYYYY", therefore OR will result in a true value. You need to use "AND" (&&) instead, meaning "true only if both values are true."





              Side note: It's not enough to just put an error on Trigger.new[0]; there may be multiple records in the trigger context, and this can result in a "too many retries" error during bulk data operations.






              share|improve this answer













              "OR" means "true if either value is true". If the ID is "XXXXXXXXX", for example, it will NOT be "YYYYYYYYY", therefore OR will result in a true value. You need to use "AND" (&&) instead, meaning "true only if both values are true."





              Side note: It's not enough to just put an error on Trigger.new[0]; there may be multiple records in the trigger context, and this can result in a "too many retries" error during bulk data operations.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Apr 18 at 16:40









              sfdcfoxsfdcfox

              267k13213461




              267k13213461













              • Maybe my logic is incorrect, but I believe do want "true if either [any] value is true" and not "true only if both values are true." Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I use the && operator than the error will be thrown only if the User's Id is equal to XXXXXXXXX, YYYYYYYYY, AND ZZZZZZZZZ?

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:44











              • Then use == instead of != in your comparison.

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:46











              • That'd mean If the user is EQUAL to X OR Y OR Z. You have it written as if the user is DIFFERENT to X OR Y OR Z

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:48






              • 2





                @MaxGoldfarb You'll want to look at de Morgan's Laws. If the user Id must be one of three values, you would say "Id is equal to XXXXX OR YYYYY OR ZZZZZ".

                – sfdcfox
                Apr 18 at 16:52











              • Awesome thanks for your help guys, I really appreciate it, @sfdcfox using the && operator seems to satisfy my requirements from my brief testing. Again, really appreciate you guys/girls help!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:55



















              • Maybe my logic is incorrect, but I believe do want "true if either [any] value is true" and not "true only if both values are true." Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I use the && operator than the error will be thrown only if the User's Id is equal to XXXXXXXXX, YYYYYYYYY, AND ZZZZZZZZZ?

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:44











              • Then use == instead of != in your comparison.

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:46











              • That'd mean If the user is EQUAL to X OR Y OR Z. You have it written as if the user is DIFFERENT to X OR Y OR Z

                – Sebastian Kessel
                Apr 18 at 16:48






              • 2





                @MaxGoldfarb You'll want to look at de Morgan's Laws. If the user Id must be one of three values, you would say "Id is equal to XXXXX OR YYYYY OR ZZZZZ".

                – sfdcfox
                Apr 18 at 16:52











              • Awesome thanks for your help guys, I really appreciate it, @sfdcfox using the && operator seems to satisfy my requirements from my brief testing. Again, really appreciate you guys/girls help!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:55

















              Maybe my logic is incorrect, but I believe do want "true if either [any] value is true" and not "true only if both values are true." Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I use the && operator than the error will be thrown only if the User's Id is equal to XXXXXXXXX, YYYYYYYYY, AND ZZZZZZZZZ?

              – Max Goldfarb
              Apr 18 at 16:44





              Maybe my logic is incorrect, but I believe do want "true if either [any] value is true" and not "true only if both values are true." Please correct me if I am wrong, but if I use the && operator than the error will be thrown only if the User's Id is equal to XXXXXXXXX, YYYYYYYYY, AND ZZZZZZZZZ?

              – Max Goldfarb
              Apr 18 at 16:44













              Then use == instead of != in your comparison.

              – Sebastian Kessel
              Apr 18 at 16:46





              Then use == instead of != in your comparison.

              – Sebastian Kessel
              Apr 18 at 16:46













              That'd mean If the user is EQUAL to X OR Y OR Z. You have it written as if the user is DIFFERENT to X OR Y OR Z

              – Sebastian Kessel
              Apr 18 at 16:48





              That'd mean If the user is EQUAL to X OR Y OR Z. You have it written as if the user is DIFFERENT to X OR Y OR Z

              – Sebastian Kessel
              Apr 18 at 16:48




              2




              2





              @MaxGoldfarb You'll want to look at de Morgan's Laws. If the user Id must be one of three values, you would say "Id is equal to XXXXX OR YYYYY OR ZZZZZ".

              – sfdcfox
              Apr 18 at 16:52





              @MaxGoldfarb You'll want to look at de Morgan's Laws. If the user Id must be one of three values, you would say "Id is equal to XXXXX OR YYYYY OR ZZZZZ".

              – sfdcfox
              Apr 18 at 16:52













              Awesome thanks for your help guys, I really appreciate it, @sfdcfox using the && operator seems to satisfy my requirements from my brief testing. Again, really appreciate you guys/girls help!

              – Max Goldfarb
              Apr 18 at 16:55





              Awesome thanks for your help guys, I really appreciate it, @sfdcfox using the && operator seems to satisfy my requirements from my brief testing. Again, really appreciate you guys/girls help!

              – Max Goldfarb
              Apr 18 at 16:55













              1














              @sfdcfox is correct, Although I would do a



              !( (new List<String>{'XXXX','YYYY','ZZZZ'}).contains(currentUserId) )


              Chaining a bunch of Logical OR's gets messy, especially if you need to add to the list in the future. I would make a public static variable of it to describe the classes permission if you plan on using that permission group you have there in more than one place.






              share|improve this answer
























              • That's a really good idea, will probably do this. Thanks!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:59











              • If you want also you could make a property of the class and say something like Class.UserIsInAdminGroup

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:01











              • I would look into this ticket if you are planning on using List<Id> salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/224490/…. Theres a reason i use string because salesforce fixing things won't come in your or my lifetime

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:14
















              1














              @sfdcfox is correct, Although I would do a



              !( (new List<String>{'XXXX','YYYY','ZZZZ'}).contains(currentUserId) )


              Chaining a bunch of Logical OR's gets messy, especially if you need to add to the list in the future. I would make a public static variable of it to describe the classes permission if you plan on using that permission group you have there in more than one place.






              share|improve this answer
























              • That's a really good idea, will probably do this. Thanks!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:59











              • If you want also you could make a property of the class and say something like Class.UserIsInAdminGroup

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:01











              • I would look into this ticket if you are planning on using List<Id> salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/224490/…. Theres a reason i use string because salesforce fixing things won't come in your or my lifetime

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:14














              1












              1








              1







              @sfdcfox is correct, Although I would do a



              !( (new List<String>{'XXXX','YYYY','ZZZZ'}).contains(currentUserId) )


              Chaining a bunch of Logical OR's gets messy, especially if you need to add to the list in the future. I would make a public static variable of it to describe the classes permission if you plan on using that permission group you have there in more than one place.






              share|improve this answer













              @sfdcfox is correct, Although I would do a



              !( (new List<String>{'XXXX','YYYY','ZZZZ'}).contains(currentUserId) )


              Chaining a bunch of Logical OR's gets messy, especially if you need to add to the list in the future. I would make a public static variable of it to describe the classes permission if you plan on using that permission group you have there in more than one place.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Apr 18 at 16:56









              Zach HutchinsZach Hutchins

              829




              829













              • That's a really good idea, will probably do this. Thanks!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:59











              • If you want also you could make a property of the class and say something like Class.UserIsInAdminGroup

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:01











              • I would look into this ticket if you are planning on using List<Id> salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/224490/…. Theres a reason i use string because salesforce fixing things won't come in your or my lifetime

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:14



















              • That's a really good idea, will probably do this. Thanks!

                – Max Goldfarb
                Apr 18 at 16:59











              • If you want also you could make a property of the class and say something like Class.UserIsInAdminGroup

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:01











              • I would look into this ticket if you are planning on using List<Id> salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/224490/…. Theres a reason i use string because salesforce fixing things won't come in your or my lifetime

                – Zach Hutchins
                Apr 18 at 17:14

















              That's a really good idea, will probably do this. Thanks!

              – Max Goldfarb
              Apr 18 at 16:59





              That's a really good idea, will probably do this. Thanks!

              – Max Goldfarb
              Apr 18 at 16:59













              If you want also you could make a property of the class and say something like Class.UserIsInAdminGroup

              – Zach Hutchins
              Apr 18 at 17:01





              If you want also you could make a property of the class and say something like Class.UserIsInAdminGroup

              – Zach Hutchins
              Apr 18 at 17:01













              I would look into this ticket if you are planning on using List<Id> salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/224490/…. Theres a reason i use string because salesforce fixing things won't come in your or my lifetime

              – Zach Hutchins
              Apr 18 at 17:14





              I would look into this ticket if you are planning on using List<Id> salesforce.stackexchange.com/questions/224490/…. Theres a reason i use string because salesforce fixing things won't come in your or my lifetime

              – Zach Hutchins
              Apr 18 at 17:14











              1














              In programming,



              if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') {}


              means that, if at least any of the 3 conditions is TRUE, the full expression is TRUE.



              For a currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', the expression is evaluated as




              currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' ==> FALSE

              currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' ==> TRUE

              currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ' ==> TRUE




              So, for currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', it adds the error Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field, which is not desirable.



              It can be explained by De Morgan's Law.




              Not (A and B) is the same as Not A or Not B.



              Not (A or B) is the same as Not A and Not B.




              In your case,




              currentUserId NOT ('XXXXXXXXX' OR 'YYYYYYYYY' OR 'ZZZZZZZZZ')




              which can be written as




              currentUserId NOT 'XXXXXXXXX' AND currentUserId NOT 'YYYYYYYYY' AND currentUserId NOT 'ZZZZZZZZZ'







              share|improve this answer




























                1














                In programming,



                if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') {}


                means that, if at least any of the 3 conditions is TRUE, the full expression is TRUE.



                For a currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', the expression is evaluated as




                currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' ==> FALSE

                currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' ==> TRUE

                currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ' ==> TRUE




                So, for currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', it adds the error Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field, which is not desirable.



                It can be explained by De Morgan's Law.




                Not (A and B) is the same as Not A or Not B.



                Not (A or B) is the same as Not A and Not B.




                In your case,




                currentUserId NOT ('XXXXXXXXX' OR 'YYYYYYYYY' OR 'ZZZZZZZZZ')




                which can be written as




                currentUserId NOT 'XXXXXXXXX' AND currentUserId NOT 'YYYYYYYYY' AND currentUserId NOT 'ZZZZZZZZZ'







                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  In programming,



                  if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') {}


                  means that, if at least any of the 3 conditions is TRUE, the full expression is TRUE.



                  For a currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', the expression is evaluated as




                  currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' ==> FALSE

                  currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' ==> TRUE

                  currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ' ==> TRUE




                  So, for currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', it adds the error Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field, which is not desirable.



                  It can be explained by De Morgan's Law.




                  Not (A and B) is the same as Not A or Not B.



                  Not (A or B) is the same as Not A and Not B.




                  In your case,




                  currentUserId NOT ('XXXXXXXXX' OR 'YYYYYYYYY' OR 'ZZZZZZZZZ')




                  which can be written as




                  currentUserId NOT 'XXXXXXXXX' AND currentUserId NOT 'YYYYYYYYY' AND currentUserId NOT 'ZZZZZZZZZ'







                  share|improve this answer













                  In programming,



                  if (currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' || currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' || currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ') {}


                  means that, if at least any of the 3 conditions is TRUE, the full expression is TRUE.



                  For a currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', the expression is evaluated as




                  currentUserId != 'XXXXXXXXX' ==> FALSE

                  currentUserId != 'YYYYYYYYY' ==> TRUE

                  currentUserId != 'ZZZZZZZZZ' ==> TRUE




                  So, for currentUserId='XXXXXXXXX', it adds the error Only specific users are able to change the Account Classification Field, which is not desirable.



                  It can be explained by De Morgan's Law.




                  Not (A and B) is the same as Not A or Not B.



                  Not (A or B) is the same as Not A and Not B.




                  In your case,




                  currentUserId NOT ('XXXXXXXXX' OR 'YYYYYYYYY' OR 'ZZZZZZZZZ')




                  which can be written as




                  currentUserId NOT 'XXXXXXXXX' AND currentUserId NOT 'YYYYYYYYY' AND currentUserId NOT 'ZZZZZZZZZ'








                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 18 at 17:05









                  Noor A ShuvoNoor A Shuvo

                  1316




                  1316























                      1














                      While your logic will always return true because the value is always not one of the three values, correcting this code by inverting || to && would be missing the point that there is a better way to filter logic so it is specific to a subset of users. The two most ideal ways to code for this so that it is configurable are Custom Permissions and Hierarchy Custom Settings.



                      Custom Permissions




                      1. Create a Custom Permission named e.g. CanDoOperationX.

                      2. Create a Permission Set which contains only this permission.

                      3. Assign this Permission Set to each User in your whitelist.

                      4. Update your condition to check FeatureManagement.checkPermission('CanDoOperationX')


                      Hierarchy Custom Setting



                      This option doesn't make as much sense unless you have other user specific overrides for this functionality, but it is certainly viable.




                      1. Create a Hierarchy Custom Setting named e.g. MyTriggerSettings.

                      2. Add a Checkbox field named e.g. Can_Do_Operation_X__c.

                      3. Create a new record in this setting for each User in your whitelist.

                      4. Update your condition to check $MyTriggerSettings__c.getInstance().Can_Do_Operation_X__c.






                      share|improve this answer




























                        1














                        While your logic will always return true because the value is always not one of the three values, correcting this code by inverting || to && would be missing the point that there is a better way to filter logic so it is specific to a subset of users. The two most ideal ways to code for this so that it is configurable are Custom Permissions and Hierarchy Custom Settings.



                        Custom Permissions




                        1. Create a Custom Permission named e.g. CanDoOperationX.

                        2. Create a Permission Set which contains only this permission.

                        3. Assign this Permission Set to each User in your whitelist.

                        4. Update your condition to check FeatureManagement.checkPermission('CanDoOperationX')


                        Hierarchy Custom Setting



                        This option doesn't make as much sense unless you have other user specific overrides for this functionality, but it is certainly viable.




                        1. Create a Hierarchy Custom Setting named e.g. MyTriggerSettings.

                        2. Add a Checkbox field named e.g. Can_Do_Operation_X__c.

                        3. Create a new record in this setting for each User in your whitelist.

                        4. Update your condition to check $MyTriggerSettings__c.getInstance().Can_Do_Operation_X__c.






                        share|improve this answer


























                          1












                          1








                          1







                          While your logic will always return true because the value is always not one of the three values, correcting this code by inverting || to && would be missing the point that there is a better way to filter logic so it is specific to a subset of users. The two most ideal ways to code for this so that it is configurable are Custom Permissions and Hierarchy Custom Settings.



                          Custom Permissions




                          1. Create a Custom Permission named e.g. CanDoOperationX.

                          2. Create a Permission Set which contains only this permission.

                          3. Assign this Permission Set to each User in your whitelist.

                          4. Update your condition to check FeatureManagement.checkPermission('CanDoOperationX')


                          Hierarchy Custom Setting



                          This option doesn't make as much sense unless you have other user specific overrides for this functionality, but it is certainly viable.




                          1. Create a Hierarchy Custom Setting named e.g. MyTriggerSettings.

                          2. Add a Checkbox field named e.g. Can_Do_Operation_X__c.

                          3. Create a new record in this setting for each User in your whitelist.

                          4. Update your condition to check $MyTriggerSettings__c.getInstance().Can_Do_Operation_X__c.






                          share|improve this answer













                          While your logic will always return true because the value is always not one of the three values, correcting this code by inverting || to && would be missing the point that there is a better way to filter logic so it is specific to a subset of users. The two most ideal ways to code for this so that it is configurable are Custom Permissions and Hierarchy Custom Settings.



                          Custom Permissions




                          1. Create a Custom Permission named e.g. CanDoOperationX.

                          2. Create a Permission Set which contains only this permission.

                          3. Assign this Permission Set to each User in your whitelist.

                          4. Update your condition to check FeatureManagement.checkPermission('CanDoOperationX')


                          Hierarchy Custom Setting



                          This option doesn't make as much sense unless you have other user specific overrides for this functionality, but it is certainly viable.




                          1. Create a Hierarchy Custom Setting named e.g. MyTriggerSettings.

                          2. Add a Checkbox field named e.g. Can_Do_Operation_X__c.

                          3. Create a new record in this setting for each User in your whitelist.

                          4. Update your condition to check $MyTriggerSettings__c.getInstance().Can_Do_Operation_X__c.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Apr 18 at 17:13









                          Adrian LarsonAdrian Larson

                          111k19122259




                          111k19122259






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f258350%2fmultiple-or-conditions-in-if-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                              He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                              Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029