What is the correct abbreviation for the word “numbers”?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







31















What is the correct abbreviation for the words numbers and number?




  • Nos.

  • No.

  • Nos

  • No


Possible example usage:




  1. "Number of guests" where the word number is abbreviated

  2. "Numbers 10–15 are located in the top shelf."










share|improve this question




















  • 11





    The shortest expression is just #.

    – user13141
    Sep 24 '11 at 6:22






  • 1





    Sometimes there is a separate abbreviation for it... №

    – GEdgar
    Sep 24 '11 at 17:18






  • 1





    Does anyone find it odd when an abbreviation includes one or more letters that do not appear in the word being abbreviated?

    – user45992
    Jun 13 '13 at 13:07






  • 1





    @onomatomaniak The hash sign # is not a common or standard indication for 'number' in the UK. I do not know whether it is used in other English-speaking countries outside the US.

    – TrevorD
    Aug 13 '13 at 22:58






  • 1





    @user45992 I believe the 'o' in the abbreviation for 'number' comes from 'numero' (or a similar foreign word). lb & oz also include letters not in the corresponding English word. And where does the $ symbol come from - no 'S' in dollar.

    – TrevorD
    Aug 13 '13 at 23:01


















31















What is the correct abbreviation for the words numbers and number?




  • Nos.

  • No.

  • Nos

  • No


Possible example usage:




  1. "Number of guests" where the word number is abbreviated

  2. "Numbers 10–15 are located in the top shelf."










share|improve this question




















  • 11





    The shortest expression is just #.

    – user13141
    Sep 24 '11 at 6:22






  • 1





    Sometimes there is a separate abbreviation for it... №

    – GEdgar
    Sep 24 '11 at 17:18






  • 1





    Does anyone find it odd when an abbreviation includes one or more letters that do not appear in the word being abbreviated?

    – user45992
    Jun 13 '13 at 13:07






  • 1





    @onomatomaniak The hash sign # is not a common or standard indication for 'number' in the UK. I do not know whether it is used in other English-speaking countries outside the US.

    – TrevorD
    Aug 13 '13 at 22:58






  • 1





    @user45992 I believe the 'o' in the abbreviation for 'number' comes from 'numero' (or a similar foreign word). lb & oz also include letters not in the corresponding English word. And where does the $ symbol come from - no 'S' in dollar.

    – TrevorD
    Aug 13 '13 at 23:01














31












31








31


13






What is the correct abbreviation for the words numbers and number?




  • Nos.

  • No.

  • Nos

  • No


Possible example usage:




  1. "Number of guests" where the word number is abbreviated

  2. "Numbers 10–15 are located in the top shelf."










share|improve this question
















What is the correct abbreviation for the words numbers and number?




  • Nos.

  • No.

  • Nos

  • No


Possible example usage:




  1. "Number of guests" where the word number is abbreviated

  2. "Numbers 10–15 are located in the top shelf."







abbreviations






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Oct 14 '12 at 18:26









RegDwigнt

83.6k31282382




83.6k31282382










asked Sep 24 '11 at 4:55









AhmadAhmad

258135




258135








  • 11





    The shortest expression is just #.

    – user13141
    Sep 24 '11 at 6:22






  • 1





    Sometimes there is a separate abbreviation for it... №

    – GEdgar
    Sep 24 '11 at 17:18






  • 1





    Does anyone find it odd when an abbreviation includes one or more letters that do not appear in the word being abbreviated?

    – user45992
    Jun 13 '13 at 13:07






  • 1





    @onomatomaniak The hash sign # is not a common or standard indication for 'number' in the UK. I do not know whether it is used in other English-speaking countries outside the US.

    – TrevorD
    Aug 13 '13 at 22:58






  • 1





    @user45992 I believe the 'o' in the abbreviation for 'number' comes from 'numero' (or a similar foreign word). lb & oz also include letters not in the corresponding English word. And where does the $ symbol come from - no 'S' in dollar.

    – TrevorD
    Aug 13 '13 at 23:01














  • 11





    The shortest expression is just #.

    – user13141
    Sep 24 '11 at 6:22






  • 1





    Sometimes there is a separate abbreviation for it... №

    – GEdgar
    Sep 24 '11 at 17:18






  • 1





    Does anyone find it odd when an abbreviation includes one or more letters that do not appear in the word being abbreviated?

    – user45992
    Jun 13 '13 at 13:07






  • 1





    @onomatomaniak The hash sign # is not a common or standard indication for 'number' in the UK. I do not know whether it is used in other English-speaking countries outside the US.

    – TrevorD
    Aug 13 '13 at 22:58






  • 1





    @user45992 I believe the 'o' in the abbreviation for 'number' comes from 'numero' (or a similar foreign word). lb & oz also include letters not in the corresponding English word. And where does the $ symbol come from - no 'S' in dollar.

    – TrevorD
    Aug 13 '13 at 23:01








11




11





The shortest expression is just #.

– user13141
Sep 24 '11 at 6:22





The shortest expression is just #.

– user13141
Sep 24 '11 at 6:22




1




1





Sometimes there is a separate abbreviation for it... №

– GEdgar
Sep 24 '11 at 17:18





Sometimes there is a separate abbreviation for it... №

– GEdgar
Sep 24 '11 at 17:18




1




1





Does anyone find it odd when an abbreviation includes one or more letters that do not appear in the word being abbreviated?

– user45992
Jun 13 '13 at 13:07





Does anyone find it odd when an abbreviation includes one or more letters that do not appear in the word being abbreviated?

– user45992
Jun 13 '13 at 13:07




1




1





@onomatomaniak The hash sign # is not a common or standard indication for 'number' in the UK. I do not know whether it is used in other English-speaking countries outside the US.

– TrevorD
Aug 13 '13 at 22:58





@onomatomaniak The hash sign # is not a common or standard indication for 'number' in the UK. I do not know whether it is used in other English-speaking countries outside the US.

– TrevorD
Aug 13 '13 at 22:58




1




1





@user45992 I believe the 'o' in the abbreviation for 'number' comes from 'numero' (or a similar foreign word). lb & oz also include letters not in the corresponding English word. And where does the $ symbol come from - no 'S' in dollar.

– TrevorD
Aug 13 '13 at 23:01





@user45992 I believe the 'o' in the abbreviation for 'number' comes from 'numero' (or a similar foreign word). lb & oz also include letters not in the corresponding English word. And where does the $ symbol come from - no 'S' in dollar.

– TrevorD
Aug 13 '13 at 23:01










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















29














It is highly unlikely that there is a global standard. It differs based on practice and the standards set by the relevant authorities (publishers and the like).



Ex: The Oxford Journal Instructions for Authors suggests (Sec. 2.3):




Abbreviations where the last letter of the singular word is not included take a full stop (vol., vols./ed., eds.). The abbreviation for number is no./nos. Abbreviated unit of measurements do not take a full stop (lb, mm, kg) and do not take a final 's' in the plural.




This is a suggestion from Cambridge Dictionary for use of no. as the abbreviation for number.






share|improve this answer


























  • But no. is surely the abbreviation for "number" and nos. is the abbreviation for "numbers" in the Oxford Instructions. The "do not take a final 's' in the plural" only applies to lb, mm, kg, and so forth, and is irrelevant to this question.

    – Peter Shor
    Sep 24 '11 at 17:59








  • 2





    Both Oxford and Cambridge links explain the usage for "Client No. 5" but I don't see an answer for the case "Number of guests". Anyone have an answer to that one?

    – Marcel Gosselin
    Mar 13 '12 at 17:15











  • Covered in that definition: "No. of guests."

    – The Nate
    Oct 12 '16 at 6:56



















10














Cambridge dictionary only gives the abbreviation no. when number refers to a numeral, a position or identification, not a quantity, amount or calculation : http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/number_1



Therefore I understand "Number of guests" should not be abbreviated.



In other words, the ordinal number (e.g. No. 3, which indicates a position in an ordered list) is abbreviated, but the cardinal number (e.g. Number of guests, which indicates a numeric quantity) is not abbreviated.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    I don't think the number need necessarily be an ordinal; what is important is that "no." is used with a number to identify something. The fact that two widgets have serial nos. 29432100 and 29432200 does not mean that there were 29,432,099 widgets produced before the first, nor that there were necessarily 99 widgets produced between them--it merely means that those numbers identify the widgets in question.

    – supercat
    Aug 28 '14 at 22:01





















4














I use "num" or "nm" instead of "no" to avoid confusion with "yes/no" meaning -- especially in my computer programming variable names.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    I use nof, which means "number of". Instead of nm_eggs_in_basket, nof_eggs_in_basket.

    – Pacerier
    Mar 2 '16 at 18:58








  • 2





    Indeed, using "no" can lead to confusion: test_validates_reference_no_format

    – Artur Beljajev
    Oct 3 '18 at 14:06



















2














Per Wikipedia — Numero sign, it's also possible to use " " and " No̲ ":




The numero sign or numero symbol, № (also represented as Nº, No̲, No. or no.), is a typographic abbreviation of the word number(s) indicating ordinal numeration, especially in names and titles.



For example, with the numero sign, the written long-form of the address "Number 22 Acacia Avenue" is shortened to "№ 22 Acacia Avenue", yet both forms are spoken long.




Though it doesn't seem to be common.






share|improve this answer






















    protected by tchrist Aug 13 '14 at 14:47



    Thank you for your interest in this question.
    Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



    Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    29














    It is highly unlikely that there is a global standard. It differs based on practice and the standards set by the relevant authorities (publishers and the like).



    Ex: The Oxford Journal Instructions for Authors suggests (Sec. 2.3):




    Abbreviations where the last letter of the singular word is not included take a full stop (vol., vols./ed., eds.). The abbreviation for number is no./nos. Abbreviated unit of measurements do not take a full stop (lb, mm, kg) and do not take a final 's' in the plural.




    This is a suggestion from Cambridge Dictionary for use of no. as the abbreviation for number.






    share|improve this answer


























    • But no. is surely the abbreviation for "number" and nos. is the abbreviation for "numbers" in the Oxford Instructions. The "do not take a final 's' in the plural" only applies to lb, mm, kg, and so forth, and is irrelevant to this question.

      – Peter Shor
      Sep 24 '11 at 17:59








    • 2





      Both Oxford and Cambridge links explain the usage for "Client No. 5" but I don't see an answer for the case "Number of guests". Anyone have an answer to that one?

      – Marcel Gosselin
      Mar 13 '12 at 17:15











    • Covered in that definition: "No. of guests."

      – The Nate
      Oct 12 '16 at 6:56
















    29














    It is highly unlikely that there is a global standard. It differs based on practice and the standards set by the relevant authorities (publishers and the like).



    Ex: The Oxford Journal Instructions for Authors suggests (Sec. 2.3):




    Abbreviations where the last letter of the singular word is not included take a full stop (vol., vols./ed., eds.). The abbreviation for number is no./nos. Abbreviated unit of measurements do not take a full stop (lb, mm, kg) and do not take a final 's' in the plural.




    This is a suggestion from Cambridge Dictionary for use of no. as the abbreviation for number.






    share|improve this answer


























    • But no. is surely the abbreviation for "number" and nos. is the abbreviation for "numbers" in the Oxford Instructions. The "do not take a final 's' in the plural" only applies to lb, mm, kg, and so forth, and is irrelevant to this question.

      – Peter Shor
      Sep 24 '11 at 17:59








    • 2





      Both Oxford and Cambridge links explain the usage for "Client No. 5" but I don't see an answer for the case "Number of guests". Anyone have an answer to that one?

      – Marcel Gosselin
      Mar 13 '12 at 17:15











    • Covered in that definition: "No. of guests."

      – The Nate
      Oct 12 '16 at 6:56














    29












    29








    29







    It is highly unlikely that there is a global standard. It differs based on practice and the standards set by the relevant authorities (publishers and the like).



    Ex: The Oxford Journal Instructions for Authors suggests (Sec. 2.3):




    Abbreviations where the last letter of the singular word is not included take a full stop (vol., vols./ed., eds.). The abbreviation for number is no./nos. Abbreviated unit of measurements do not take a full stop (lb, mm, kg) and do not take a final 's' in the plural.




    This is a suggestion from Cambridge Dictionary for use of no. as the abbreviation for number.






    share|improve this answer















    It is highly unlikely that there is a global standard. It differs based on practice and the standards set by the relevant authorities (publishers and the like).



    Ex: The Oxford Journal Instructions for Authors suggests (Sec. 2.3):




    Abbreviations where the last letter of the singular word is not included take a full stop (vol., vols./ed., eds.). The abbreviation for number is no./nos. Abbreviated unit of measurements do not take a full stop (lb, mm, kg) and do not take a final 's' in the plural.




    This is a suggestion from Cambridge Dictionary for use of no. as the abbreviation for number.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Sep 24 '11 at 6:06

























    answered Sep 24 '11 at 6:01









    check123check123

    1,88521315




    1,88521315













    • But no. is surely the abbreviation for "number" and nos. is the abbreviation for "numbers" in the Oxford Instructions. The "do not take a final 's' in the plural" only applies to lb, mm, kg, and so forth, and is irrelevant to this question.

      – Peter Shor
      Sep 24 '11 at 17:59








    • 2





      Both Oxford and Cambridge links explain the usage for "Client No. 5" but I don't see an answer for the case "Number of guests". Anyone have an answer to that one?

      – Marcel Gosselin
      Mar 13 '12 at 17:15











    • Covered in that definition: "No. of guests."

      – The Nate
      Oct 12 '16 at 6:56



















    • But no. is surely the abbreviation for "number" and nos. is the abbreviation for "numbers" in the Oxford Instructions. The "do not take a final 's' in the plural" only applies to lb, mm, kg, and so forth, and is irrelevant to this question.

      – Peter Shor
      Sep 24 '11 at 17:59








    • 2





      Both Oxford and Cambridge links explain the usage for "Client No. 5" but I don't see an answer for the case "Number of guests". Anyone have an answer to that one?

      – Marcel Gosselin
      Mar 13 '12 at 17:15











    • Covered in that definition: "No. of guests."

      – The Nate
      Oct 12 '16 at 6:56

















    But no. is surely the abbreviation for "number" and nos. is the abbreviation for "numbers" in the Oxford Instructions. The "do not take a final 's' in the plural" only applies to lb, mm, kg, and so forth, and is irrelevant to this question.

    – Peter Shor
    Sep 24 '11 at 17:59







    But no. is surely the abbreviation for "number" and nos. is the abbreviation for "numbers" in the Oxford Instructions. The "do not take a final 's' in the plural" only applies to lb, mm, kg, and so forth, and is irrelevant to this question.

    – Peter Shor
    Sep 24 '11 at 17:59






    2




    2





    Both Oxford and Cambridge links explain the usage for "Client No. 5" but I don't see an answer for the case "Number of guests". Anyone have an answer to that one?

    – Marcel Gosselin
    Mar 13 '12 at 17:15





    Both Oxford and Cambridge links explain the usage for "Client No. 5" but I don't see an answer for the case "Number of guests". Anyone have an answer to that one?

    – Marcel Gosselin
    Mar 13 '12 at 17:15













    Covered in that definition: "No. of guests."

    – The Nate
    Oct 12 '16 at 6:56





    Covered in that definition: "No. of guests."

    – The Nate
    Oct 12 '16 at 6:56













    10














    Cambridge dictionary only gives the abbreviation no. when number refers to a numeral, a position or identification, not a quantity, amount or calculation : http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/number_1



    Therefore I understand "Number of guests" should not be abbreviated.



    In other words, the ordinal number (e.g. No. 3, which indicates a position in an ordered list) is abbreviated, but the cardinal number (e.g. Number of guests, which indicates a numeric quantity) is not abbreviated.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      I don't think the number need necessarily be an ordinal; what is important is that "no." is used with a number to identify something. The fact that two widgets have serial nos. 29432100 and 29432200 does not mean that there were 29,432,099 widgets produced before the first, nor that there were necessarily 99 widgets produced between them--it merely means that those numbers identify the widgets in question.

      – supercat
      Aug 28 '14 at 22:01


















    10














    Cambridge dictionary only gives the abbreviation no. when number refers to a numeral, a position or identification, not a quantity, amount or calculation : http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/number_1



    Therefore I understand "Number of guests" should not be abbreviated.



    In other words, the ordinal number (e.g. No. 3, which indicates a position in an ordered list) is abbreviated, but the cardinal number (e.g. Number of guests, which indicates a numeric quantity) is not abbreviated.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      I don't think the number need necessarily be an ordinal; what is important is that "no." is used with a number to identify something. The fact that two widgets have serial nos. 29432100 and 29432200 does not mean that there were 29,432,099 widgets produced before the first, nor that there were necessarily 99 widgets produced between them--it merely means that those numbers identify the widgets in question.

      – supercat
      Aug 28 '14 at 22:01
















    10












    10








    10







    Cambridge dictionary only gives the abbreviation no. when number refers to a numeral, a position or identification, not a quantity, amount or calculation : http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/number_1



    Therefore I understand "Number of guests" should not be abbreviated.



    In other words, the ordinal number (e.g. No. 3, which indicates a position in an ordered list) is abbreviated, but the cardinal number (e.g. Number of guests, which indicates a numeric quantity) is not abbreviated.






    share|improve this answer















    Cambridge dictionary only gives the abbreviation no. when number refers to a numeral, a position or identification, not a quantity, amount or calculation : http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/number_1



    Therefore I understand "Number of guests" should not be abbreviated.



    In other words, the ordinal number (e.g. No. 3, which indicates a position in an ordered list) is abbreviated, but the cardinal number (e.g. Number of guests, which indicates a numeric quantity) is not abbreviated.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Dec 18 '13 at 5:31









    anongoodnurse

    51k14108191




    51k14108191










    answered Apr 28 '13 at 8:48









    CarmeCarme

    10112




    10112








    • 1





      I don't think the number need necessarily be an ordinal; what is important is that "no." is used with a number to identify something. The fact that two widgets have serial nos. 29432100 and 29432200 does not mean that there were 29,432,099 widgets produced before the first, nor that there were necessarily 99 widgets produced between them--it merely means that those numbers identify the widgets in question.

      – supercat
      Aug 28 '14 at 22:01
















    • 1





      I don't think the number need necessarily be an ordinal; what is important is that "no." is used with a number to identify something. The fact that two widgets have serial nos. 29432100 and 29432200 does not mean that there were 29,432,099 widgets produced before the first, nor that there were necessarily 99 widgets produced between them--it merely means that those numbers identify the widgets in question.

      – supercat
      Aug 28 '14 at 22:01










    1




    1





    I don't think the number need necessarily be an ordinal; what is important is that "no." is used with a number to identify something. The fact that two widgets have serial nos. 29432100 and 29432200 does not mean that there were 29,432,099 widgets produced before the first, nor that there were necessarily 99 widgets produced between them--it merely means that those numbers identify the widgets in question.

    – supercat
    Aug 28 '14 at 22:01







    I don't think the number need necessarily be an ordinal; what is important is that "no." is used with a number to identify something. The fact that two widgets have serial nos. 29432100 and 29432200 does not mean that there were 29,432,099 widgets produced before the first, nor that there were necessarily 99 widgets produced between them--it merely means that those numbers identify the widgets in question.

    – supercat
    Aug 28 '14 at 22:01













    4














    I use "num" or "nm" instead of "no" to avoid confusion with "yes/no" meaning -- especially in my computer programming variable names.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      I use nof, which means "number of". Instead of nm_eggs_in_basket, nof_eggs_in_basket.

      – Pacerier
      Mar 2 '16 at 18:58








    • 2





      Indeed, using "no" can lead to confusion: test_validates_reference_no_format

      – Artur Beljajev
      Oct 3 '18 at 14:06
















    4














    I use "num" or "nm" instead of "no" to avoid confusion with "yes/no" meaning -- especially in my computer programming variable names.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      I use nof, which means "number of". Instead of nm_eggs_in_basket, nof_eggs_in_basket.

      – Pacerier
      Mar 2 '16 at 18:58








    • 2





      Indeed, using "no" can lead to confusion: test_validates_reference_no_format

      – Artur Beljajev
      Oct 3 '18 at 14:06














    4












    4








    4







    I use "num" or "nm" instead of "no" to avoid confusion with "yes/no" meaning -- especially in my computer programming variable names.






    share|improve this answer













    I use "num" or "nm" instead of "no" to avoid confusion with "yes/no" meaning -- especially in my computer programming variable names.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 23 '14 at 9:00









    Arden WeissArden Weiss

    52133




    52133








    • 1





      I use nof, which means "number of". Instead of nm_eggs_in_basket, nof_eggs_in_basket.

      – Pacerier
      Mar 2 '16 at 18:58








    • 2





      Indeed, using "no" can lead to confusion: test_validates_reference_no_format

      – Artur Beljajev
      Oct 3 '18 at 14:06














    • 1





      I use nof, which means "number of". Instead of nm_eggs_in_basket, nof_eggs_in_basket.

      – Pacerier
      Mar 2 '16 at 18:58








    • 2





      Indeed, using "no" can lead to confusion: test_validates_reference_no_format

      – Artur Beljajev
      Oct 3 '18 at 14:06








    1




    1





    I use nof, which means "number of". Instead of nm_eggs_in_basket, nof_eggs_in_basket.

    – Pacerier
    Mar 2 '16 at 18:58







    I use nof, which means "number of". Instead of nm_eggs_in_basket, nof_eggs_in_basket.

    – Pacerier
    Mar 2 '16 at 18:58






    2




    2





    Indeed, using "no" can lead to confusion: test_validates_reference_no_format

    – Artur Beljajev
    Oct 3 '18 at 14:06





    Indeed, using "no" can lead to confusion: test_validates_reference_no_format

    – Artur Beljajev
    Oct 3 '18 at 14:06











    2














    Per Wikipedia — Numero sign, it's also possible to use " " and " No̲ ":




    The numero sign or numero symbol, № (also represented as Nº, No̲, No. or no.), is a typographic abbreviation of the word number(s) indicating ordinal numeration, especially in names and titles.



    For example, with the numero sign, the written long-form of the address "Number 22 Acacia Avenue" is shortened to "№ 22 Acacia Avenue", yet both forms are spoken long.




    Though it doesn't seem to be common.






    share|improve this answer




























      2














      Per Wikipedia — Numero sign, it's also possible to use " " and " No̲ ":




      The numero sign or numero symbol, № (also represented as Nº, No̲, No. or no.), is a typographic abbreviation of the word number(s) indicating ordinal numeration, especially in names and titles.



      For example, with the numero sign, the written long-form of the address "Number 22 Acacia Avenue" is shortened to "№ 22 Acacia Avenue", yet both forms are spoken long.




      Though it doesn't seem to be common.






      share|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2







        Per Wikipedia — Numero sign, it's also possible to use " " and " No̲ ":




        The numero sign or numero symbol, № (also represented as Nº, No̲, No. or no.), is a typographic abbreviation of the word number(s) indicating ordinal numeration, especially in names and titles.



        For example, with the numero sign, the written long-form of the address "Number 22 Acacia Avenue" is shortened to "№ 22 Acacia Avenue", yet both forms are spoken long.




        Though it doesn't seem to be common.






        share|improve this answer













        Per Wikipedia — Numero sign, it's also possible to use " " and " No̲ ":




        The numero sign or numero symbol, № (also represented as Nº, No̲, No. or no.), is a typographic abbreviation of the word number(s) indicating ordinal numeration, especially in names and titles.



        For example, with the numero sign, the written long-form of the address "Number 22 Acacia Avenue" is shortened to "№ 22 Acacia Avenue", yet both forms are spoken long.




        Though it doesn't seem to be common.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 2 '16 at 19:06









        PacerierPacerier

        3,3522774120




        3,3522774120

















            protected by tchrist Aug 13 '14 at 14:47



            Thank you for your interest in this question.
            Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



            Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029