Collocation for perception





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1















Considering the sentence:




Investor perception on active funds will be ______ too expensive.




I am struggling to find the right wording. The message is clear in my mind, but I can't make it clear with grammar or word choice. The above is the closest I got.



The message is supposed to be investors will think active funds will be too expensive. I just want to change it a bit so I use the smarty-pants phrase "investor perception." However, I can't seem to make the rest of the sentence coordinate.



Question



Is there an appropriate word choice for this sentence and maintain a formal/professional tone?



Note: You may take slight creative liberties with the other portions of the sentence if need be.










share|improve this question

























  • The question is why you think the fashionable abstract phrase is preferable to your own perfectly clear way of saying it. Your discomfort might be a justified rebellion against a pandemic of abstraction. “Investors will judge active funds to be overpriced” is clear and strong.

    – Tuffy
    May 24 at 7:08











  • Inserting a phrase like "investor perception" works best if you have a more complex sentence. For example, We are struggling with investor perception of overvaluing or We are struggling with investor perceived overvaluing of active funds. Sorry, I don't know what active funds are. But now hopefully you see the trick to this.

    – aparente001
    May 24 at 16:36


















1















Considering the sentence:




Investor perception on active funds will be ______ too expensive.




I am struggling to find the right wording. The message is clear in my mind, but I can't make it clear with grammar or word choice. The above is the closest I got.



The message is supposed to be investors will think active funds will be too expensive. I just want to change it a bit so I use the smarty-pants phrase "investor perception." However, I can't seem to make the rest of the sentence coordinate.



Question



Is there an appropriate word choice for this sentence and maintain a formal/professional tone?



Note: You may take slight creative liberties with the other portions of the sentence if need be.










share|improve this question

























  • The question is why you think the fashionable abstract phrase is preferable to your own perfectly clear way of saying it. Your discomfort might be a justified rebellion against a pandemic of abstraction. “Investors will judge active funds to be overpriced” is clear and strong.

    – Tuffy
    May 24 at 7:08











  • Inserting a phrase like "investor perception" works best if you have a more complex sentence. For example, We are struggling with investor perception of overvaluing or We are struggling with investor perceived overvaluing of active funds. Sorry, I don't know what active funds are. But now hopefully you see the trick to this.

    – aparente001
    May 24 at 16:36














1












1








1








Considering the sentence:




Investor perception on active funds will be ______ too expensive.




I am struggling to find the right wording. The message is clear in my mind, but I can't make it clear with grammar or word choice. The above is the closest I got.



The message is supposed to be investors will think active funds will be too expensive. I just want to change it a bit so I use the smarty-pants phrase "investor perception." However, I can't seem to make the rest of the sentence coordinate.



Question



Is there an appropriate word choice for this sentence and maintain a formal/professional tone?



Note: You may take slight creative liberties with the other portions of the sentence if need be.










share|improve this question














Considering the sentence:




Investor perception on active funds will be ______ too expensive.




I am struggling to find the right wording. The message is clear in my mind, but I can't make it clear with grammar or word choice. The above is the closest I got.



The message is supposed to be investors will think active funds will be too expensive. I just want to change it a bit so I use the smarty-pants phrase "investor perception." However, I can't seem to make the rest of the sentence coordinate.



Question



Is there an appropriate word choice for this sentence and maintain a formal/professional tone?



Note: You may take slight creative liberties with the other portions of the sentence if need be.







single-word-requests






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 24 at 6:54









Arash HowaidaArash Howaida

5133 silver badges13 bronze badges




5133 silver badges13 bronze badges
















  • The question is why you think the fashionable abstract phrase is preferable to your own perfectly clear way of saying it. Your discomfort might be a justified rebellion against a pandemic of abstraction. “Investors will judge active funds to be overpriced” is clear and strong.

    – Tuffy
    May 24 at 7:08











  • Inserting a phrase like "investor perception" works best if you have a more complex sentence. For example, We are struggling with investor perception of overvaluing or We are struggling with investor perceived overvaluing of active funds. Sorry, I don't know what active funds are. But now hopefully you see the trick to this.

    – aparente001
    May 24 at 16:36



















  • The question is why you think the fashionable abstract phrase is preferable to your own perfectly clear way of saying it. Your discomfort might be a justified rebellion against a pandemic of abstraction. “Investors will judge active funds to be overpriced” is clear and strong.

    – Tuffy
    May 24 at 7:08











  • Inserting a phrase like "investor perception" works best if you have a more complex sentence. For example, We are struggling with investor perception of overvaluing or We are struggling with investor perceived overvaluing of active funds. Sorry, I don't know what active funds are. But now hopefully you see the trick to this.

    – aparente001
    May 24 at 16:36

















The question is why you think the fashionable abstract phrase is preferable to your own perfectly clear way of saying it. Your discomfort might be a justified rebellion against a pandemic of abstraction. “Investors will judge active funds to be overpriced” is clear and strong.

– Tuffy
May 24 at 7:08





The question is why you think the fashionable abstract phrase is preferable to your own perfectly clear way of saying it. Your discomfort might be a justified rebellion against a pandemic of abstraction. “Investors will judge active funds to be overpriced” is clear and strong.

– Tuffy
May 24 at 7:08













Inserting a phrase like "investor perception" works best if you have a more complex sentence. For example, We are struggling with investor perception of overvaluing or We are struggling with investor perceived overvaluing of active funds. Sorry, I don't know what active funds are. But now hopefully you see the trick to this.

– aparente001
May 24 at 16:36





Inserting a phrase like "investor perception" works best if you have a more complex sentence. For example, We are struggling with investor perception of overvaluing or We are struggling with investor perceived overvaluing of active funds. Sorry, I don't know what active funds are. But now hopefully you see the trick to this.

– aparente001
May 24 at 16:36










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














The construction of your current example sentence can't work (regardless of what word you drop into the blank spot) because it makes investor perception the object of the verb. It would say that it's investor perception that's too expensive—not the active funds.



If you need to keep investor perception, then simply forget about another verb in the location you give, and use the following phrasing:




Investor perception will be that active funds are too expensive.






If you are still looking for a verb to fit with too expensive, then you need to drop the use of perception and use something like this:




Active funds will be considered too expensive by investors.

Active funds will be found too expensive by investors.




Or, if you don't like the passive construction and want to change the focus:




Investors will consider active funds (to be) too expensive.

Investors will find active funds (to be) too expensive.







share|improve this answer






























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f499554%2fcollocation-for-perception%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    The construction of your current example sentence can't work (regardless of what word you drop into the blank spot) because it makes investor perception the object of the verb. It would say that it's investor perception that's too expensive—not the active funds.



    If you need to keep investor perception, then simply forget about another verb in the location you give, and use the following phrasing:




    Investor perception will be that active funds are too expensive.






    If you are still looking for a verb to fit with too expensive, then you need to drop the use of perception and use something like this:




    Active funds will be considered too expensive by investors.

    Active funds will be found too expensive by investors.




    Or, if you don't like the passive construction and want to change the focus:




    Investors will consider active funds (to be) too expensive.

    Investors will find active funds (to be) too expensive.







    share|improve this answer
































      3














      The construction of your current example sentence can't work (regardless of what word you drop into the blank spot) because it makes investor perception the object of the verb. It would say that it's investor perception that's too expensive—not the active funds.



      If you need to keep investor perception, then simply forget about another verb in the location you give, and use the following phrasing:




      Investor perception will be that active funds are too expensive.






      If you are still looking for a verb to fit with too expensive, then you need to drop the use of perception and use something like this:




      Active funds will be considered too expensive by investors.

      Active funds will be found too expensive by investors.




      Or, if you don't like the passive construction and want to change the focus:




      Investors will consider active funds (to be) too expensive.

      Investors will find active funds (to be) too expensive.







      share|improve this answer






























        3












        3








        3







        The construction of your current example sentence can't work (regardless of what word you drop into the blank spot) because it makes investor perception the object of the verb. It would say that it's investor perception that's too expensive—not the active funds.



        If you need to keep investor perception, then simply forget about another verb in the location you give, and use the following phrasing:




        Investor perception will be that active funds are too expensive.






        If you are still looking for a verb to fit with too expensive, then you need to drop the use of perception and use something like this:




        Active funds will be considered too expensive by investors.

        Active funds will be found too expensive by investors.




        Or, if you don't like the passive construction and want to change the focus:




        Investors will consider active funds (to be) too expensive.

        Investors will find active funds (to be) too expensive.







        share|improve this answer















        The construction of your current example sentence can't work (regardless of what word you drop into the blank spot) because it makes investor perception the object of the verb. It would say that it's investor perception that's too expensive—not the active funds.



        If you need to keep investor perception, then simply forget about another verb in the location you give, and use the following phrasing:




        Investor perception will be that active funds are too expensive.






        If you are still looking for a verb to fit with too expensive, then you need to drop the use of perception and use something like this:




        Active funds will be considered too expensive by investors.

        Active funds will be found too expensive by investors.




        Or, if you don't like the passive construction and want to change the focus:




        Investors will consider active funds (to be) too expensive.

        Investors will find active funds (to be) too expensive.








        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 24 at 17:21

























        answered May 24 at 17:11









        Jason BassfordJason Bassford

        26.6k3 gold badges35 silver badges66 bronze badges




        26.6k3 gold badges35 silver badges66 bronze badges

































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f499554%2fcollocation-for-perception%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029