My boss asked me to take a one-day class, then signs it up as a day off [on hold]












85















A while back, I had asked for 3 day off from work, 2 days before my vacation, my boss asked me whether I was interested in a one-day class during my vacation (3 days off). I agreed because the class was only given once every few months or I'd have to wait for the next one. I attended this class and it was a great informative class. this was around mid February.



Today, I saw that the day of the class was still listed as a day off, and when I asked my boss about it, he said that I was not at work so it counts as a day off.



Is this a common thing?



I work/live in the Netherlands and my field of work is IT.



By 'class' I mean a course/training session related to my work that my boss paid for. My boss offered it to me without me mentioning it beforehand.



I'm currently in my last week of work for this company, that's the reason I checked how many days off I have left and found out about this. We do not have a HR department since the company I work for is small (5-6 people).



About the trust being broken read this question about how that was shattered a while back.










share|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by gnat, Twyxz, Jenny D, JimmyB, Dmitry Grigoryev 3 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only a specific company or position are of limited use to future visitors. Questions seeking legal advice should be directed to legal professionals. For more information, click here." – gnat, Twyxz, Jenny D, JimmyB, Dmitry Grigoryev

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 6





    I don't know what is the system in Netherlands specifically but don't you have a form or any official documentation that you have to submit to your employer for taking time off, precisely for the documentation? This piece of information is missing. You said you asked for 3 days, but you don't say how many you were granted and took. There should be official paper trail for this. It's not common to go to work-related courses on free time, but it's also uncommon to forbid it. What's common is to follow official timesheets.

    – luk32
    yesterday








  • 3





    You are leaving anyway, so there is no sense picking a fight about this. If you really feel strongly about it, just take a day off in your last week and pretend you were sick. If you say you had a hangover after celebrating getting a new job, what can your old boss do about that?

    – alephzero
    23 hours ago











  • @luk32 I've never had such a form at any company I've worked at. At my current workplace, it's as simple as saying to my manager "can I take Monday off?" and then putting "John ~ Holiday" in my Google Calendar. The only difference here is that I have to maintain a Google Sheets document of days I worked in the month, whereas at my old workplace I didn't have to even do that.

    – John
    15 hours ago











  • Who will the class benefit? You personally, only; or also the company (by having benefit of a worker smarter in your task areas)?

    – Harper
    13 hours ago






  • 2





    As you are already leaving, you might not want to enter this discussion. Depending on the exact wording in your contract and what you agreed to, they might be in their right to recuperate the cost of the training anyway.

    – Mark Rotteveel
    7 hours ago
















85















A while back, I had asked for 3 day off from work, 2 days before my vacation, my boss asked me whether I was interested in a one-day class during my vacation (3 days off). I agreed because the class was only given once every few months or I'd have to wait for the next one. I attended this class and it was a great informative class. this was around mid February.



Today, I saw that the day of the class was still listed as a day off, and when I asked my boss about it, he said that I was not at work so it counts as a day off.



Is this a common thing?



I work/live in the Netherlands and my field of work is IT.



By 'class' I mean a course/training session related to my work that my boss paid for. My boss offered it to me without me mentioning it beforehand.



I'm currently in my last week of work for this company, that's the reason I checked how many days off I have left and found out about this. We do not have a HR department since the company I work for is small (5-6 people).



About the trust being broken read this question about how that was shattered a while back.










share|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by gnat, Twyxz, Jenny D, JimmyB, Dmitry Grigoryev 3 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only a specific company or position are of limited use to future visitors. Questions seeking legal advice should be directed to legal professionals. For more information, click here." – gnat, Twyxz, Jenny D, JimmyB, Dmitry Grigoryev

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 6





    I don't know what is the system in Netherlands specifically but don't you have a form or any official documentation that you have to submit to your employer for taking time off, precisely for the documentation? This piece of information is missing. You said you asked for 3 days, but you don't say how many you were granted and took. There should be official paper trail for this. It's not common to go to work-related courses on free time, but it's also uncommon to forbid it. What's common is to follow official timesheets.

    – luk32
    yesterday








  • 3





    You are leaving anyway, so there is no sense picking a fight about this. If you really feel strongly about it, just take a day off in your last week and pretend you were sick. If you say you had a hangover after celebrating getting a new job, what can your old boss do about that?

    – alephzero
    23 hours ago











  • @luk32 I've never had such a form at any company I've worked at. At my current workplace, it's as simple as saying to my manager "can I take Monday off?" and then putting "John ~ Holiday" in my Google Calendar. The only difference here is that I have to maintain a Google Sheets document of days I worked in the month, whereas at my old workplace I didn't have to even do that.

    – John
    15 hours ago











  • Who will the class benefit? You personally, only; or also the company (by having benefit of a worker smarter in your task areas)?

    – Harper
    13 hours ago






  • 2





    As you are already leaving, you might not want to enter this discussion. Depending on the exact wording in your contract and what you agreed to, they might be in their right to recuperate the cost of the training anyway.

    – Mark Rotteveel
    7 hours ago














85












85








85


1






A while back, I had asked for 3 day off from work, 2 days before my vacation, my boss asked me whether I was interested in a one-day class during my vacation (3 days off). I agreed because the class was only given once every few months or I'd have to wait for the next one. I attended this class and it was a great informative class. this was around mid February.



Today, I saw that the day of the class was still listed as a day off, and when I asked my boss about it, he said that I was not at work so it counts as a day off.



Is this a common thing?



I work/live in the Netherlands and my field of work is IT.



By 'class' I mean a course/training session related to my work that my boss paid for. My boss offered it to me without me mentioning it beforehand.



I'm currently in my last week of work for this company, that's the reason I checked how many days off I have left and found out about this. We do not have a HR department since the company I work for is small (5-6 people).



About the trust being broken read this question about how that was shattered a while back.










share|improve this question
















A while back, I had asked for 3 day off from work, 2 days before my vacation, my boss asked me whether I was interested in a one-day class during my vacation (3 days off). I agreed because the class was only given once every few months or I'd have to wait for the next one. I attended this class and it was a great informative class. this was around mid February.



Today, I saw that the day of the class was still listed as a day off, and when I asked my boss about it, he said that I was not at work so it counts as a day off.



Is this a common thing?



I work/live in the Netherlands and my field of work is IT.



By 'class' I mean a course/training session related to my work that my boss paid for. My boss offered it to me without me mentioning it beforehand.



I'm currently in my last week of work for this company, that's the reason I checked how many days off I have left and found out about this. We do not have a HR department since the company I work for is small (5-6 people).



About the trust being broken read this question about how that was shattered a while back.







time-off netherlands






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday







darnok

















asked yesterday









darnokdarnok

1,286359




1,286359




put on hold as off-topic by gnat, Twyxz, Jenny D, JimmyB, Dmitry Grigoryev 3 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only a specific company or position are of limited use to future visitors. Questions seeking legal advice should be directed to legal professionals. For more information, click here." – gnat, Twyxz, Jenny D, JimmyB, Dmitry Grigoryev

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by gnat, Twyxz, Jenny D, JimmyB, Dmitry Grigoryev 3 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only a specific company or position are of limited use to future visitors. Questions seeking legal advice should be directed to legal professionals. For more information, click here." – gnat, Twyxz, Jenny D, JimmyB, Dmitry Grigoryev

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 6





    I don't know what is the system in Netherlands specifically but don't you have a form or any official documentation that you have to submit to your employer for taking time off, precisely for the documentation? This piece of information is missing. You said you asked for 3 days, but you don't say how many you were granted and took. There should be official paper trail for this. It's not common to go to work-related courses on free time, but it's also uncommon to forbid it. What's common is to follow official timesheets.

    – luk32
    yesterday








  • 3





    You are leaving anyway, so there is no sense picking a fight about this. If you really feel strongly about it, just take a day off in your last week and pretend you were sick. If you say you had a hangover after celebrating getting a new job, what can your old boss do about that?

    – alephzero
    23 hours ago











  • @luk32 I've never had such a form at any company I've worked at. At my current workplace, it's as simple as saying to my manager "can I take Monday off?" and then putting "John ~ Holiday" in my Google Calendar. The only difference here is that I have to maintain a Google Sheets document of days I worked in the month, whereas at my old workplace I didn't have to even do that.

    – John
    15 hours ago











  • Who will the class benefit? You personally, only; or also the company (by having benefit of a worker smarter in your task areas)?

    – Harper
    13 hours ago






  • 2





    As you are already leaving, you might not want to enter this discussion. Depending on the exact wording in your contract and what you agreed to, they might be in their right to recuperate the cost of the training anyway.

    – Mark Rotteveel
    7 hours ago














  • 6





    I don't know what is the system in Netherlands specifically but don't you have a form or any official documentation that you have to submit to your employer for taking time off, precisely for the documentation? This piece of information is missing. You said you asked for 3 days, but you don't say how many you were granted and took. There should be official paper trail for this. It's not common to go to work-related courses on free time, but it's also uncommon to forbid it. What's common is to follow official timesheets.

    – luk32
    yesterday








  • 3





    You are leaving anyway, so there is no sense picking a fight about this. If you really feel strongly about it, just take a day off in your last week and pretend you were sick. If you say you had a hangover after celebrating getting a new job, what can your old boss do about that?

    – alephzero
    23 hours ago











  • @luk32 I've never had such a form at any company I've worked at. At my current workplace, it's as simple as saying to my manager "can I take Monday off?" and then putting "John ~ Holiday" in my Google Calendar. The only difference here is that I have to maintain a Google Sheets document of days I worked in the month, whereas at my old workplace I didn't have to even do that.

    – John
    15 hours ago











  • Who will the class benefit? You personally, only; or also the company (by having benefit of a worker smarter in your task areas)?

    – Harper
    13 hours ago






  • 2





    As you are already leaving, you might not want to enter this discussion. Depending on the exact wording in your contract and what you agreed to, they might be in their right to recuperate the cost of the training anyway.

    – Mark Rotteveel
    7 hours ago








6




6





I don't know what is the system in Netherlands specifically but don't you have a form or any official documentation that you have to submit to your employer for taking time off, precisely for the documentation? This piece of information is missing. You said you asked for 3 days, but you don't say how many you were granted and took. There should be official paper trail for this. It's not common to go to work-related courses on free time, but it's also uncommon to forbid it. What's common is to follow official timesheets.

– luk32
yesterday







I don't know what is the system in Netherlands specifically but don't you have a form or any official documentation that you have to submit to your employer for taking time off, precisely for the documentation? This piece of information is missing. You said you asked for 3 days, but you don't say how many you were granted and took. There should be official paper trail for this. It's not common to go to work-related courses on free time, but it's also uncommon to forbid it. What's common is to follow official timesheets.

– luk32
yesterday






3




3





You are leaving anyway, so there is no sense picking a fight about this. If you really feel strongly about it, just take a day off in your last week and pretend you were sick. If you say you had a hangover after celebrating getting a new job, what can your old boss do about that?

– alephzero
23 hours ago





You are leaving anyway, so there is no sense picking a fight about this. If you really feel strongly about it, just take a day off in your last week and pretend you were sick. If you say you had a hangover after celebrating getting a new job, what can your old boss do about that?

– alephzero
23 hours ago













@luk32 I've never had such a form at any company I've worked at. At my current workplace, it's as simple as saying to my manager "can I take Monday off?" and then putting "John ~ Holiday" in my Google Calendar. The only difference here is that I have to maintain a Google Sheets document of days I worked in the month, whereas at my old workplace I didn't have to even do that.

– John
15 hours ago





@luk32 I've never had such a form at any company I've worked at. At my current workplace, it's as simple as saying to my manager "can I take Monday off?" and then putting "John ~ Holiday" in my Google Calendar. The only difference here is that I have to maintain a Google Sheets document of days I worked in the month, whereas at my old workplace I didn't have to even do that.

– John
15 hours ago













Who will the class benefit? You personally, only; or also the company (by having benefit of a worker smarter in your task areas)?

– Harper
13 hours ago





Who will the class benefit? You personally, only; or also the company (by having benefit of a worker smarter in your task areas)?

– Harper
13 hours ago




2




2





As you are already leaving, you might not want to enter this discussion. Depending on the exact wording in your contract and what you agreed to, they might be in their right to recuperate the cost of the training anyway.

– Mark Rotteveel
7 hours ago





As you are already leaving, you might not want to enter this discussion. Depending on the exact wording in your contract and what you agreed to, they might be in their right to recuperate the cost of the training anyway.

– Mark Rotteveel
7 hours ago










12 Answers
12






active

oldest

votes


















158














No this is not common. Your manager is trying to take advantage of you. If the class is work related then it doesn't matter that you are not at work, it needs to be treated as a work day. You need to ask your manager to remove the day off as you will be attending a work related class. If he refuses, then inform him that you will not be attending a class on your day off. Regardless, you might want to search for a new company to work for.






share|improve this answer



















  • 26





    Also to mention that the OP has already sent his notice, so he's leaving the company anyway.

    – Xander
    yesterday






  • 5





    If it was not at your workplace make sure to check if you are legally obliged to get compensation for travel/food. Also the travel from/to your place of work might count as work time (even if you didn't go to your workplace first)

    – Josef
    yesterday






  • 21





    It's vacation, not sick leave. In Germany, if your employer asked you to work while you're sick, he's committing a crime. If he's asking you to work and then marking it as vacation, he's also committing a crime. He's basically stealing a day of work's pay. I don't know about the laws in the Netherlands, but I'd be surprised if they're different. Talk to HR, inform them of what happened, make sure they don't take the vacation day.

    – xyious
    yesterday






  • 3





    @xyious Ok, but you seem to be overlooking an important technicality. The boss never sent OP for the training, they asked if OP wants to go, it was just a notification. I cannot imagine a boss "marking vacations" for employees without their knowledge, it's important paper work, at my locale employee files for free time. I suspect boss made OP go out of their free will. Sick-leave was an example (hence the IF) because the consequences are more grave. OP using company money during their free time could even make them liable. It seems you didn't read the question. There is no HR.

    – luk32
    18 hours ago








  • 4





    As a Dutch person, I’m not a lawyer but I’m pretty sure this is illegal too. At the very least the boss’ argument that ‘if you weren’t at work you don’t get paid’ is absolute nonsense. I attended several conferences in company time, at no point was there any question of doing that in my own time.

    – Sebastiaan van den Broek
    13 hours ago



















44














In hindsight, you should have negotiated the effect this had on your holiday days before accepting the course.




Sure, if you cancel that day's holiday, I'll attend.




Since (I assume) the course is related to your work, you should now head to HR and tell them what happened and ask for them to strike off that day's holiday time so that you can use it for your own PTO.



If that doesn't work out for you, you might have to suck this one up and put it down to experience. Be really careful about your manager redirecting your PTO in future.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    Company has no HR dep. as stated on op's question.

    – Pedro Lobito
    18 hours ago






  • 2





    @PedroLobito: Correct but because stuff like this gets made dupe targets and the next one probably will I upvoted anyway. I'm not on this site enough to take issue with the dupe policy.

    – Joshua
    14 hours ago











  • By "suck it up" I assume you mean take the holiday as holiday and handle any resultant fallout. I assume you don't mean simply acquiescing and working a full day without pay. I mean there's "unreasonable employer requests" and then there's being browbeaten by the org into literally working for no money...

    – benxyzzy
    3 hours ago



















17















Is this a common thing?




No, it's not.



As long as the training is related to your profession and helps you make a better employee (and even also a human being), it's a part of the "job".



You need to reach out to your HR. Maybe your boss is misreading or misinterpreting (deliberately or unintentionally) the company policies.





edit:




I'm currently in my last week of work for this company, [....] We do not have a HR department since the company I work for is small (5-6 people).




Well, then he played a little trick. There's really nothing much you can do. Just move on and take this as an experience.






share|improve this answer





















  • 9





    In my experience, you can receive the paid time at the end of your period of employment, or get paid directly for accrued time. You certainly can do something. The trick the OP's boss played is called wage theft.

    – De Novo
    22 hours ago








  • 6





    I'm disappointed with how many people's advice here is "just don't pay attention to something illegal because you are leaving". Isn't this the perfect time to oust the illegal activity and get fairly compensated for what you are owed by law? Sure, there is merit in trying to avoid confrontation but I don't think this should be the predominant advice - "it's fine to have illegal acts forced on you, as long as they won't repeat". What's next - "don't file a police report if you get robbed - it's not like you're going to get robbed all the time"?

    – VLAZ
    10 hours ago











  • @VLAZ (1) prove it's illegal - I certainly do not have access to OP's company policies.[notice the maybe in my answer]. (2) Sure, you can fight all you want, is is worth your time? (3) Correct, what is you are employed by the robbers?

    – Sourav Ghosh
    10 hours ago











  • @VLAZ It's not the answers say here to turn a blind eye to illegal things: It's simply to learn from mistakes and move on, because pursuing that matter would not be worthy of the return-on-investment point of view. YMMV.

    – Sourav Ghosh
    10 hours ago













  • @SouravGhosh OK, let me quote something here "As long as the training is related to your profession and helps you make a better employee (and even also a human being), it's a part of the "job"." - it seems illegal to work on your offdays without compensation.

    – VLAZ
    10 hours ago



















13














No, this is not common among reputable management. Your boss knows darn well that they stiffed you and if they are this petty then trying to get that day back from them will uncover further levels of pettiness.





Based on your previous question combined with this one I would suggest to just learn from this experience and move on.



Besides, you have taken more sick days than allowed, right? Were you paid for all of those days? If so, then I would call it "even".





Far too many people are willing to die on a molehill and if one is not readily available then they build their own.



^ Don't be one of these people.






share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    Or use the same thing to your advantage. It's your last week at work, and suddenly you come down with a stomach bug which takes you out until Friday, when you finally make it in to fill in your leaving paperwork and claim those days off sick. Are they prepared to call you out and die on that molehill? Probably not.

    – Graham
    18 hours ago






  • 1





    @Graham Did you even read the other post from OP? Without your suggestion OP is just an ex employee that screwed up a little. With your suggestion OP is an ex employee which screwed up a little and is conniving. My answer seeks to avoid molehills and somehow several people have upvoted your comment because you've went ahead and created a molehill for OP; unbelievable.

    – MonkeyZeus
    5 hours ago













  • Not sure what your problem is. People upvoted the comment because it's a valid rephrasing of your point in the OP's favour. But if you're choosing to make this a molehill you want to fight over, then enjoy your molehill.

    – Graham
    3 hours ago











  • @Graham This isn't worth my time. Just know that your comment is an invalid rephrasing of my answer, not needed, and potentially detrimental advice for OP but feel free to continue thinking you've helped...

    – MonkeyZeus
    3 hours ago



















8















Today, I saw that the day of the class was still listed as a day off, and when I asked my boss about it, he said that I was not at work so it counts as a day off.



Is this a common thing?




No, absolutely not.




I'm currently in my last week of work for this company.




Well, that changes things. Did you really think your company would send to a class on company time in the last week you are working for them? What benefit to the company does you going to that class have?



Your boss could have made it more clear to you that going to class would be in your own time -- but you should also have been more proactive and have asked for details (who pays for it, on whose time, etc) when he offered.






share|improve this answer
























  • "Did you really think your company would send to a class on company time in the last week you are working for them?" that happened "around mid February" - about a month ago. The previous question from OP was also a month ago. It's not exactly clear, but very likely that the resignation wasn't submitted when the training happened. Or even if it was, then that makes it very odd to suggest the training.

    – VLAZ
    10 hours ago











  • @VLAZ: Compared to most countries, the Netherlands has very long_ notice periods. When resigning in February, the effective end date would typically be March 31st (last date of next month).

    – MSalters
    8 hours ago











  • @MSalters again I am basing this on the previous question - posted on the 20th of February 2019. The update from the 27th of February says "[my boss] would not renew my contract". OP now has 1 week left. It's unclear the dispute and the resolultion happened before or after the training but it seems a bit illogical to be before. Do you have anything to firmly suggest the training either a) happened the last week of employment b) was after the dispute?

    – VLAZ
    7 hours ago











  • @VLAZ: Looking at the linked question, it seems there's no resignation at all. That's not unusual in the Netherlands; you can have definite contracts - the most common ones being definite end date contracts.

    – MSalters
    7 hours ago











  • @MSalters yes, it was my bad to call it "resignation", when I meant "decision to leave the company". This question is still incorrect in suggesting a) this happened now instead of a month ago b) this happened before it was known OP would be leaving the company.

    – VLAZ
    7 hours ago



















4














Note: This answer applies to required education/courses to fulfill your agreement



What your employer did is unlawful according to this. In the Netherlands there is a workplace law called "Scholingsplicht" that, summed up, says:




An employer is required to make all necessary provisions for the employee to be able to do his/her job (fulfill the contract/agreement). This includes required additional education, courses, etc.




In Dutch terminology, this also includes travel expenses (and any expenses you incur for your work), but these details can be found in your agreement (or CAO if applicable).



Do note that the law does not say anything about paying your hourly wage, if you need assurance then the logical step is to setup and both sign a studiekostenovereenkomst where both parties agree on the terms of the additional courses, schooling, costs/salary etc.



If you voluntarily can take the course, it is allowed to not count as "work".






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Gizmo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Actually, the first link states the exact opposite of what you claim. The employer gave a choice, which makes it voluntary and therefore not work time. Had it been required, then it would have been work time. You are right to refer to the CAO, because it can deviate from the default rules.

    – MSalters
    8 hours ago











  • @MSalters ah right! Skimmed a bit too fast :) Thanks for pointing out.

    – Gizmo
    8 hours ago













  • Also, IT so there's no CAO, and he's already resigned so you're not going to get a studiekostenovereenkomst either.

    – MSalters
    8 hours ago



















3














I will counter that it IS common in my area: Specifically, I am a contractor in the US, and it is common for employers to offer to pay the cost of training with the qualification that the time itself is unpaid. Larger companies may even have an education allowance. If you wanted to take a class during the week, you could use paid time off to fill the gap in your hours, so that your paycheck would not be reduced. (Often such classes are offered on the weekends anyway or we flex our hours to still fit in the same number of billable hours around our class.) These courses usually offer some certificate or similar that you can use as a justification for a pay increase.



The main difference is that a reputable company is upfront about what can and cannot be charged! For example, "Come to corporate HQ for a meeting (charge 1 hour to overhead)." or "You are invited to our holiday party (no chargable time)." We also fill in time cards so our time is billed correctly, so it would be clear right away how much time you're charging and how much time you're taking as vacation.






share|improve this answer
























  • Yes, this. Where I work this is also common for trainings or events where the employee wants to go. If the company would not normally send the employee, but employee would like to go, often the compromise will be "we will pay the event fee if you take time off to attend". Of course, if the employer wants you to go, it's work and thus paid.

    – sleske
    9 hours ago











  • If it is at the employer's behest it is legally considered 'work' in the USA and you are entitled to pay for hours worked. Contracting is different but contracting as you speak of it is mostly a thing because it's in the employer's favor, which this is an example of.

    – Adonalsium
    3 hours ago



















2














As you work in a sector where getting a new decent job is quite easy, you still have "negotiation power". I would have a serious face-to-face conversation with my boss, explaining him the "misunderstanding" and the reasons why you are not happy about these events.



Ask politely for the fair thing to be done. If he refuses, start looking for a new job, after all, if they can cheat you on one silly "day off", there may be plenty of other things where they will take advantage of you (if they aren't already)






share|improve this answer










New contributor




asdf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




























    0














    Considering that you have already taken the course, I would recommend documenting that this should be counted as work and that this has been refused. Once you have left the company you can then inform the company that you will be pursuing them for the debt of the unpaid day's work.



    I am assuming that the Netherlands has some sort of small claims court which you could pursue the company through or an employment tribunal. Waiting until after you have left will avoid any blow back. Hopefully they will not contest it and compensate you once you suggest legal avenues.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    user101970 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















    • No "small claims court", but the regular courts do have a simplified procedure (no lawyer required) for small claims.

      – MSalters
      8 hours ago



















    0














    In your case they paid for a class for a resigned employee, one that you liked and found greatly informative. I'd be careful about accusing them of taking advantage of you.



    Your title says that they asked you to take the class, your description say that they asked you if you wanted to take the class. That's a very significant difference.



    I've definitely had deals with employers where we split the voluntary investment on the growth of my personal skills and I don't see anything strange with that. They can pay for the conference fee and the days off, while I pay for the travel and accommodation for example.



    You should have asked for clarification if you expected to get paid for the time as well. Especially since you've already resigned.






    share|improve this answer































      -2















      Is this a common thing?
      I work/live in the Netherlands and my field of work is IT.




      Yes, in the Netherlands it is common practice to do courses, trainings and/or educations in your own time (days off) on the costs of your boss. If the course is not obligatory, but voluntary applied for or agreed upon. However, this practice usually tends to happen within smaller companies and companies that are not financially stable.



      Take my talk on law with a grain of salt, I am not a lawyer, but I am the owner of a IT company in the Netherlands



      Unless described differently in a CAO (which more often, if not always, is not the case in Dutch IT companies) or in your Contract.



      The Dutch law differentiates between obligatory courses, and voluntarily courses.
      If the course was mandatory, they would have to respect the fact that your time off, is your time off. And would have to either pay your for the hours spend, or compensate you by the means of hours off.



      However, if you voluntarily agreed to take the course in your spare time. Which is what I am assuming by the phrasing of your very first paragraph. Then the company is not obliged to pay for the time, or give you time off in return. This because you could have spend the time in other ways.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 1





        I work in IT in the Netherlands (10+ years) and not ever did I have to take a day off to follow a training/course during office hours. Especially not if my boss would offer it. Only community organised events (during evenings), I had to do in my own time. They are also 100% optional. I wouldn't say this is common practice.

        – Caroline
        6 hours ago













      • @Caroline I've worked in IT for ~ 10 years now as well, and can say most of these companies with the exception of 2, did not pay for hours, or return free time when it was a optional course. Now as a company owner of a small IT company, I must say I do actually respect it as work hours. Non the less, I would not be obligated too.

        – DXM
        5 hours ago



















      -3














      In the Netherlands I noticed that nowadays this is quite common. Ever since the bank managers moved away from banks to other parts of the world (which started happening after the bank crisis of 2008) we can notice such behaviour more and more.



      The sad thing is that in the Netherlands at least you find politics always side with the managers, so if you even bring this up the laws will be changed to favour your manager before you get any money.



      Sure it is not right, but it happens and you have to learn to live with it and make the best out of the given situation we are in.






      share|improve this answer
























      • This reads more like a rant than an answer. And as a Dutch person living abroad, I can assure you employees are well protected in the Netherlands, compared to elsewhere.

        – Sebastiaan van den Broek
        13 hours ago


















      12 Answers
      12






      active

      oldest

      votes








      12 Answers
      12






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      158














      No this is not common. Your manager is trying to take advantage of you. If the class is work related then it doesn't matter that you are not at work, it needs to be treated as a work day. You need to ask your manager to remove the day off as you will be attending a work related class. If he refuses, then inform him that you will not be attending a class on your day off. Regardless, you might want to search for a new company to work for.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 26





        Also to mention that the OP has already sent his notice, so he's leaving the company anyway.

        – Xander
        yesterday






      • 5





        If it was not at your workplace make sure to check if you are legally obliged to get compensation for travel/food. Also the travel from/to your place of work might count as work time (even if you didn't go to your workplace first)

        – Josef
        yesterday






      • 21





        It's vacation, not sick leave. In Germany, if your employer asked you to work while you're sick, he's committing a crime. If he's asking you to work and then marking it as vacation, he's also committing a crime. He's basically stealing a day of work's pay. I don't know about the laws in the Netherlands, but I'd be surprised if they're different. Talk to HR, inform them of what happened, make sure they don't take the vacation day.

        – xyious
        yesterday






      • 3





        @xyious Ok, but you seem to be overlooking an important technicality. The boss never sent OP for the training, they asked if OP wants to go, it was just a notification. I cannot imagine a boss "marking vacations" for employees without their knowledge, it's important paper work, at my locale employee files for free time. I suspect boss made OP go out of their free will. Sick-leave was an example (hence the IF) because the consequences are more grave. OP using company money during their free time could even make them liable. It seems you didn't read the question. There is no HR.

        – luk32
        18 hours ago








      • 4





        As a Dutch person, I’m not a lawyer but I’m pretty sure this is illegal too. At the very least the boss’ argument that ‘if you weren’t at work you don’t get paid’ is absolute nonsense. I attended several conferences in company time, at no point was there any question of doing that in my own time.

        – Sebastiaan van den Broek
        13 hours ago
















      158














      No this is not common. Your manager is trying to take advantage of you. If the class is work related then it doesn't matter that you are not at work, it needs to be treated as a work day. You need to ask your manager to remove the day off as you will be attending a work related class. If he refuses, then inform him that you will not be attending a class on your day off. Regardless, you might want to search for a new company to work for.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 26





        Also to mention that the OP has already sent his notice, so he's leaving the company anyway.

        – Xander
        yesterday






      • 5





        If it was not at your workplace make sure to check if you are legally obliged to get compensation for travel/food. Also the travel from/to your place of work might count as work time (even if you didn't go to your workplace first)

        – Josef
        yesterday






      • 21





        It's vacation, not sick leave. In Germany, if your employer asked you to work while you're sick, he's committing a crime. If he's asking you to work and then marking it as vacation, he's also committing a crime. He's basically stealing a day of work's pay. I don't know about the laws in the Netherlands, but I'd be surprised if they're different. Talk to HR, inform them of what happened, make sure they don't take the vacation day.

        – xyious
        yesterday






      • 3





        @xyious Ok, but you seem to be overlooking an important technicality. The boss never sent OP for the training, they asked if OP wants to go, it was just a notification. I cannot imagine a boss "marking vacations" for employees without their knowledge, it's important paper work, at my locale employee files for free time. I suspect boss made OP go out of their free will. Sick-leave was an example (hence the IF) because the consequences are more grave. OP using company money during their free time could even make them liable. It seems you didn't read the question. There is no HR.

        – luk32
        18 hours ago








      • 4





        As a Dutch person, I’m not a lawyer but I’m pretty sure this is illegal too. At the very least the boss’ argument that ‘if you weren’t at work you don’t get paid’ is absolute nonsense. I attended several conferences in company time, at no point was there any question of doing that in my own time.

        – Sebastiaan van den Broek
        13 hours ago














      158












      158








      158







      No this is not common. Your manager is trying to take advantage of you. If the class is work related then it doesn't matter that you are not at work, it needs to be treated as a work day. You need to ask your manager to remove the day off as you will be attending a work related class. If he refuses, then inform him that you will not be attending a class on your day off. Regardless, you might want to search for a new company to work for.






      share|improve this answer













      No this is not common. Your manager is trying to take advantage of you. If the class is work related then it doesn't matter that you are not at work, it needs to be treated as a work day. You need to ask your manager to remove the day off as you will be attending a work related class. If he refuses, then inform him that you will not be attending a class on your day off. Regardless, you might want to search for a new company to work for.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered yesterday









      sf02sf02

      9,82861740




      9,82861740








      • 26





        Also to mention that the OP has already sent his notice, so he's leaving the company anyway.

        – Xander
        yesterday






      • 5





        If it was not at your workplace make sure to check if you are legally obliged to get compensation for travel/food. Also the travel from/to your place of work might count as work time (even if you didn't go to your workplace first)

        – Josef
        yesterday






      • 21





        It's vacation, not sick leave. In Germany, if your employer asked you to work while you're sick, he's committing a crime. If he's asking you to work and then marking it as vacation, he's also committing a crime. He's basically stealing a day of work's pay. I don't know about the laws in the Netherlands, but I'd be surprised if they're different. Talk to HR, inform them of what happened, make sure they don't take the vacation day.

        – xyious
        yesterday






      • 3





        @xyious Ok, but you seem to be overlooking an important technicality. The boss never sent OP for the training, they asked if OP wants to go, it was just a notification. I cannot imagine a boss "marking vacations" for employees without their knowledge, it's important paper work, at my locale employee files for free time. I suspect boss made OP go out of their free will. Sick-leave was an example (hence the IF) because the consequences are more grave. OP using company money during their free time could even make them liable. It seems you didn't read the question. There is no HR.

        – luk32
        18 hours ago








      • 4





        As a Dutch person, I’m not a lawyer but I’m pretty sure this is illegal too. At the very least the boss’ argument that ‘if you weren’t at work you don’t get paid’ is absolute nonsense. I attended several conferences in company time, at no point was there any question of doing that in my own time.

        – Sebastiaan van den Broek
        13 hours ago














      • 26





        Also to mention that the OP has already sent his notice, so he's leaving the company anyway.

        – Xander
        yesterday






      • 5





        If it was not at your workplace make sure to check if you are legally obliged to get compensation for travel/food. Also the travel from/to your place of work might count as work time (even if you didn't go to your workplace first)

        – Josef
        yesterday






      • 21





        It's vacation, not sick leave. In Germany, if your employer asked you to work while you're sick, he's committing a crime. If he's asking you to work and then marking it as vacation, he's also committing a crime. He's basically stealing a day of work's pay. I don't know about the laws in the Netherlands, but I'd be surprised if they're different. Talk to HR, inform them of what happened, make sure they don't take the vacation day.

        – xyious
        yesterday






      • 3





        @xyious Ok, but you seem to be overlooking an important technicality. The boss never sent OP for the training, they asked if OP wants to go, it was just a notification. I cannot imagine a boss "marking vacations" for employees without their knowledge, it's important paper work, at my locale employee files for free time. I suspect boss made OP go out of their free will. Sick-leave was an example (hence the IF) because the consequences are more grave. OP using company money during their free time could even make them liable. It seems you didn't read the question. There is no HR.

        – luk32
        18 hours ago








      • 4





        As a Dutch person, I’m not a lawyer but I’m pretty sure this is illegal too. At the very least the boss’ argument that ‘if you weren’t at work you don’t get paid’ is absolute nonsense. I attended several conferences in company time, at no point was there any question of doing that in my own time.

        – Sebastiaan van den Broek
        13 hours ago








      26




      26





      Also to mention that the OP has already sent his notice, so he's leaving the company anyway.

      – Xander
      yesterday





      Also to mention that the OP has already sent his notice, so he's leaving the company anyway.

      – Xander
      yesterday




      5




      5





      If it was not at your workplace make sure to check if you are legally obliged to get compensation for travel/food. Also the travel from/to your place of work might count as work time (even if you didn't go to your workplace first)

      – Josef
      yesterday





      If it was not at your workplace make sure to check if you are legally obliged to get compensation for travel/food. Also the travel from/to your place of work might count as work time (even if you didn't go to your workplace first)

      – Josef
      yesterday




      21




      21





      It's vacation, not sick leave. In Germany, if your employer asked you to work while you're sick, he's committing a crime. If he's asking you to work and then marking it as vacation, he's also committing a crime. He's basically stealing a day of work's pay. I don't know about the laws in the Netherlands, but I'd be surprised if they're different. Talk to HR, inform them of what happened, make sure they don't take the vacation day.

      – xyious
      yesterday





      It's vacation, not sick leave. In Germany, if your employer asked you to work while you're sick, he's committing a crime. If he's asking you to work and then marking it as vacation, he's also committing a crime. He's basically stealing a day of work's pay. I don't know about the laws in the Netherlands, but I'd be surprised if they're different. Talk to HR, inform them of what happened, make sure they don't take the vacation day.

      – xyious
      yesterday




      3




      3





      @xyious Ok, but you seem to be overlooking an important technicality. The boss never sent OP for the training, they asked if OP wants to go, it was just a notification. I cannot imagine a boss "marking vacations" for employees without their knowledge, it's important paper work, at my locale employee files for free time. I suspect boss made OP go out of their free will. Sick-leave was an example (hence the IF) because the consequences are more grave. OP using company money during their free time could even make them liable. It seems you didn't read the question. There is no HR.

      – luk32
      18 hours ago







      @xyious Ok, but you seem to be overlooking an important technicality. The boss never sent OP for the training, they asked if OP wants to go, it was just a notification. I cannot imagine a boss "marking vacations" for employees without their knowledge, it's important paper work, at my locale employee files for free time. I suspect boss made OP go out of their free will. Sick-leave was an example (hence the IF) because the consequences are more grave. OP using company money during their free time could even make them liable. It seems you didn't read the question. There is no HR.

      – luk32
      18 hours ago






      4




      4





      As a Dutch person, I’m not a lawyer but I’m pretty sure this is illegal too. At the very least the boss’ argument that ‘if you weren’t at work you don’t get paid’ is absolute nonsense. I attended several conferences in company time, at no point was there any question of doing that in my own time.

      – Sebastiaan van den Broek
      13 hours ago





      As a Dutch person, I’m not a lawyer but I’m pretty sure this is illegal too. At the very least the boss’ argument that ‘if you weren’t at work you don’t get paid’ is absolute nonsense. I attended several conferences in company time, at no point was there any question of doing that in my own time.

      – Sebastiaan van den Broek
      13 hours ago













      44














      In hindsight, you should have negotiated the effect this had on your holiday days before accepting the course.




      Sure, if you cancel that day's holiday, I'll attend.




      Since (I assume) the course is related to your work, you should now head to HR and tell them what happened and ask for them to strike off that day's holiday time so that you can use it for your own PTO.



      If that doesn't work out for you, you might have to suck this one up and put it down to experience. Be really careful about your manager redirecting your PTO in future.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 2





        Company has no HR dep. as stated on op's question.

        – Pedro Lobito
        18 hours ago






      • 2





        @PedroLobito: Correct but because stuff like this gets made dupe targets and the next one probably will I upvoted anyway. I'm not on this site enough to take issue with the dupe policy.

        – Joshua
        14 hours ago











      • By "suck it up" I assume you mean take the holiday as holiday and handle any resultant fallout. I assume you don't mean simply acquiescing and working a full day without pay. I mean there's "unreasonable employer requests" and then there's being browbeaten by the org into literally working for no money...

        – benxyzzy
        3 hours ago
















      44














      In hindsight, you should have negotiated the effect this had on your holiday days before accepting the course.




      Sure, if you cancel that day's holiday, I'll attend.




      Since (I assume) the course is related to your work, you should now head to HR and tell them what happened and ask for them to strike off that day's holiday time so that you can use it for your own PTO.



      If that doesn't work out for you, you might have to suck this one up and put it down to experience. Be really careful about your manager redirecting your PTO in future.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 2





        Company has no HR dep. as stated on op's question.

        – Pedro Lobito
        18 hours ago






      • 2





        @PedroLobito: Correct but because stuff like this gets made dupe targets and the next one probably will I upvoted anyway. I'm not on this site enough to take issue with the dupe policy.

        – Joshua
        14 hours ago











      • By "suck it up" I assume you mean take the holiday as holiday and handle any resultant fallout. I assume you don't mean simply acquiescing and working a full day without pay. I mean there's "unreasonable employer requests" and then there's being browbeaten by the org into literally working for no money...

        – benxyzzy
        3 hours ago














      44












      44








      44







      In hindsight, you should have negotiated the effect this had on your holiday days before accepting the course.




      Sure, if you cancel that day's holiday, I'll attend.




      Since (I assume) the course is related to your work, you should now head to HR and tell them what happened and ask for them to strike off that day's holiday time so that you can use it for your own PTO.



      If that doesn't work out for you, you might have to suck this one up and put it down to experience. Be really careful about your manager redirecting your PTO in future.






      share|improve this answer













      In hindsight, you should have negotiated the effect this had on your holiday days before accepting the course.




      Sure, if you cancel that day's holiday, I'll attend.




      Since (I assume) the course is related to your work, you should now head to HR and tell them what happened and ask for them to strike off that day's holiday time so that you can use it for your own PTO.



      If that doesn't work out for you, you might have to suck this one up and put it down to experience. Be really careful about your manager redirecting your PTO in future.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered yesterday









      SnowSnow

      63.8k52209254




      63.8k52209254








      • 2





        Company has no HR dep. as stated on op's question.

        – Pedro Lobito
        18 hours ago






      • 2





        @PedroLobito: Correct but because stuff like this gets made dupe targets and the next one probably will I upvoted anyway. I'm not on this site enough to take issue with the dupe policy.

        – Joshua
        14 hours ago











      • By "suck it up" I assume you mean take the holiday as holiday and handle any resultant fallout. I assume you don't mean simply acquiescing and working a full day without pay. I mean there's "unreasonable employer requests" and then there's being browbeaten by the org into literally working for no money...

        – benxyzzy
        3 hours ago














      • 2





        Company has no HR dep. as stated on op's question.

        – Pedro Lobito
        18 hours ago






      • 2





        @PedroLobito: Correct but because stuff like this gets made dupe targets and the next one probably will I upvoted anyway. I'm not on this site enough to take issue with the dupe policy.

        – Joshua
        14 hours ago











      • By "suck it up" I assume you mean take the holiday as holiday and handle any resultant fallout. I assume you don't mean simply acquiescing and working a full day without pay. I mean there's "unreasonable employer requests" and then there's being browbeaten by the org into literally working for no money...

        – benxyzzy
        3 hours ago








      2




      2





      Company has no HR dep. as stated on op's question.

      – Pedro Lobito
      18 hours ago





      Company has no HR dep. as stated on op's question.

      – Pedro Lobito
      18 hours ago




      2




      2





      @PedroLobito: Correct but because stuff like this gets made dupe targets and the next one probably will I upvoted anyway. I'm not on this site enough to take issue with the dupe policy.

      – Joshua
      14 hours ago





      @PedroLobito: Correct but because stuff like this gets made dupe targets and the next one probably will I upvoted anyway. I'm not on this site enough to take issue with the dupe policy.

      – Joshua
      14 hours ago













      By "suck it up" I assume you mean take the holiday as holiday and handle any resultant fallout. I assume you don't mean simply acquiescing and working a full day without pay. I mean there's "unreasonable employer requests" and then there's being browbeaten by the org into literally working for no money...

      – benxyzzy
      3 hours ago





      By "suck it up" I assume you mean take the holiday as holiday and handle any resultant fallout. I assume you don't mean simply acquiescing and working a full day without pay. I mean there's "unreasonable employer requests" and then there's being browbeaten by the org into literally working for no money...

      – benxyzzy
      3 hours ago











      17















      Is this a common thing?




      No, it's not.



      As long as the training is related to your profession and helps you make a better employee (and even also a human being), it's a part of the "job".



      You need to reach out to your HR. Maybe your boss is misreading or misinterpreting (deliberately or unintentionally) the company policies.





      edit:




      I'm currently in my last week of work for this company, [....] We do not have a HR department since the company I work for is small (5-6 people).




      Well, then he played a little trick. There's really nothing much you can do. Just move on and take this as an experience.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 9





        In my experience, you can receive the paid time at the end of your period of employment, or get paid directly for accrued time. You certainly can do something. The trick the OP's boss played is called wage theft.

        – De Novo
        22 hours ago








      • 6





        I'm disappointed with how many people's advice here is "just don't pay attention to something illegal because you are leaving". Isn't this the perfect time to oust the illegal activity and get fairly compensated for what you are owed by law? Sure, there is merit in trying to avoid confrontation but I don't think this should be the predominant advice - "it's fine to have illegal acts forced on you, as long as they won't repeat". What's next - "don't file a police report if you get robbed - it's not like you're going to get robbed all the time"?

        – VLAZ
        10 hours ago











      • @VLAZ (1) prove it's illegal - I certainly do not have access to OP's company policies.[notice the maybe in my answer]. (2) Sure, you can fight all you want, is is worth your time? (3) Correct, what is you are employed by the robbers?

        – Sourav Ghosh
        10 hours ago











      • @VLAZ It's not the answers say here to turn a blind eye to illegal things: It's simply to learn from mistakes and move on, because pursuing that matter would not be worthy of the return-on-investment point of view. YMMV.

        – Sourav Ghosh
        10 hours ago













      • @SouravGhosh OK, let me quote something here "As long as the training is related to your profession and helps you make a better employee (and even also a human being), it's a part of the "job"." - it seems illegal to work on your offdays without compensation.

        – VLAZ
        10 hours ago
















      17















      Is this a common thing?




      No, it's not.



      As long as the training is related to your profession and helps you make a better employee (and even also a human being), it's a part of the "job".



      You need to reach out to your HR. Maybe your boss is misreading or misinterpreting (deliberately or unintentionally) the company policies.





      edit:




      I'm currently in my last week of work for this company, [....] We do not have a HR department since the company I work for is small (5-6 people).




      Well, then he played a little trick. There's really nothing much you can do. Just move on and take this as an experience.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 9





        In my experience, you can receive the paid time at the end of your period of employment, or get paid directly for accrued time. You certainly can do something. The trick the OP's boss played is called wage theft.

        – De Novo
        22 hours ago








      • 6





        I'm disappointed with how many people's advice here is "just don't pay attention to something illegal because you are leaving". Isn't this the perfect time to oust the illegal activity and get fairly compensated for what you are owed by law? Sure, there is merit in trying to avoid confrontation but I don't think this should be the predominant advice - "it's fine to have illegal acts forced on you, as long as they won't repeat". What's next - "don't file a police report if you get robbed - it's not like you're going to get robbed all the time"?

        – VLAZ
        10 hours ago











      • @VLAZ (1) prove it's illegal - I certainly do not have access to OP's company policies.[notice the maybe in my answer]. (2) Sure, you can fight all you want, is is worth your time? (3) Correct, what is you are employed by the robbers?

        – Sourav Ghosh
        10 hours ago











      • @VLAZ It's not the answers say here to turn a blind eye to illegal things: It's simply to learn from mistakes and move on, because pursuing that matter would not be worthy of the return-on-investment point of view. YMMV.

        – Sourav Ghosh
        10 hours ago













      • @SouravGhosh OK, let me quote something here "As long as the training is related to your profession and helps you make a better employee (and even also a human being), it's a part of the "job"." - it seems illegal to work on your offdays without compensation.

        – VLAZ
        10 hours ago














      17












      17








      17








      Is this a common thing?




      No, it's not.



      As long as the training is related to your profession and helps you make a better employee (and even also a human being), it's a part of the "job".



      You need to reach out to your HR. Maybe your boss is misreading or misinterpreting (deliberately or unintentionally) the company policies.





      edit:




      I'm currently in my last week of work for this company, [....] We do not have a HR department since the company I work for is small (5-6 people).




      Well, then he played a little trick. There's really nothing much you can do. Just move on and take this as an experience.






      share|improve this answer
















      Is this a common thing?




      No, it's not.



      As long as the training is related to your profession and helps you make a better employee (and even also a human being), it's a part of the "job".



      You need to reach out to your HR. Maybe your boss is misreading or misinterpreting (deliberately or unintentionally) the company policies.





      edit:




      I'm currently in my last week of work for this company, [....] We do not have a HR department since the company I work for is small (5-6 people).




      Well, then he played a little trick. There's really nothing much you can do. Just move on and take this as an experience.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 10 hours ago

























      answered yesterday









      Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh

      7,58043656




      7,58043656








      • 9





        In my experience, you can receive the paid time at the end of your period of employment, or get paid directly for accrued time. You certainly can do something. The trick the OP's boss played is called wage theft.

        – De Novo
        22 hours ago








      • 6





        I'm disappointed with how many people's advice here is "just don't pay attention to something illegal because you are leaving". Isn't this the perfect time to oust the illegal activity and get fairly compensated for what you are owed by law? Sure, there is merit in trying to avoid confrontation but I don't think this should be the predominant advice - "it's fine to have illegal acts forced on you, as long as they won't repeat". What's next - "don't file a police report if you get robbed - it's not like you're going to get robbed all the time"?

        – VLAZ
        10 hours ago











      • @VLAZ (1) prove it's illegal - I certainly do not have access to OP's company policies.[notice the maybe in my answer]. (2) Sure, you can fight all you want, is is worth your time? (3) Correct, what is you are employed by the robbers?

        – Sourav Ghosh
        10 hours ago











      • @VLAZ It's not the answers say here to turn a blind eye to illegal things: It's simply to learn from mistakes and move on, because pursuing that matter would not be worthy of the return-on-investment point of view. YMMV.

        – Sourav Ghosh
        10 hours ago













      • @SouravGhosh OK, let me quote something here "As long as the training is related to your profession and helps you make a better employee (and even also a human being), it's a part of the "job"." - it seems illegal to work on your offdays without compensation.

        – VLAZ
        10 hours ago














      • 9





        In my experience, you can receive the paid time at the end of your period of employment, or get paid directly for accrued time. You certainly can do something. The trick the OP's boss played is called wage theft.

        – De Novo
        22 hours ago








      • 6





        I'm disappointed with how many people's advice here is "just don't pay attention to something illegal because you are leaving". Isn't this the perfect time to oust the illegal activity and get fairly compensated for what you are owed by law? Sure, there is merit in trying to avoid confrontation but I don't think this should be the predominant advice - "it's fine to have illegal acts forced on you, as long as they won't repeat". What's next - "don't file a police report if you get robbed - it's not like you're going to get robbed all the time"?

        – VLAZ
        10 hours ago











      • @VLAZ (1) prove it's illegal - I certainly do not have access to OP's company policies.[notice the maybe in my answer]. (2) Sure, you can fight all you want, is is worth your time? (3) Correct, what is you are employed by the robbers?

        – Sourav Ghosh
        10 hours ago











      • @VLAZ It's not the answers say here to turn a blind eye to illegal things: It's simply to learn from mistakes and move on, because pursuing that matter would not be worthy of the return-on-investment point of view. YMMV.

        – Sourav Ghosh
        10 hours ago













      • @SouravGhosh OK, let me quote something here "As long as the training is related to your profession and helps you make a better employee (and even also a human being), it's a part of the "job"." - it seems illegal to work on your offdays without compensation.

        – VLAZ
        10 hours ago








      9




      9





      In my experience, you can receive the paid time at the end of your period of employment, or get paid directly for accrued time. You certainly can do something. The trick the OP's boss played is called wage theft.

      – De Novo
      22 hours ago







      In my experience, you can receive the paid time at the end of your period of employment, or get paid directly for accrued time. You certainly can do something. The trick the OP's boss played is called wage theft.

      – De Novo
      22 hours ago






      6




      6





      I'm disappointed with how many people's advice here is "just don't pay attention to something illegal because you are leaving". Isn't this the perfect time to oust the illegal activity and get fairly compensated for what you are owed by law? Sure, there is merit in trying to avoid confrontation but I don't think this should be the predominant advice - "it's fine to have illegal acts forced on you, as long as they won't repeat". What's next - "don't file a police report if you get robbed - it's not like you're going to get robbed all the time"?

      – VLAZ
      10 hours ago





      I'm disappointed with how many people's advice here is "just don't pay attention to something illegal because you are leaving". Isn't this the perfect time to oust the illegal activity and get fairly compensated for what you are owed by law? Sure, there is merit in trying to avoid confrontation but I don't think this should be the predominant advice - "it's fine to have illegal acts forced on you, as long as they won't repeat". What's next - "don't file a police report if you get robbed - it's not like you're going to get robbed all the time"?

      – VLAZ
      10 hours ago













      @VLAZ (1) prove it's illegal - I certainly do not have access to OP's company policies.[notice the maybe in my answer]. (2) Sure, you can fight all you want, is is worth your time? (3) Correct, what is you are employed by the robbers?

      – Sourav Ghosh
      10 hours ago





      @VLAZ (1) prove it's illegal - I certainly do not have access to OP's company policies.[notice the maybe in my answer]. (2) Sure, you can fight all you want, is is worth your time? (3) Correct, what is you are employed by the robbers?

      – Sourav Ghosh
      10 hours ago













      @VLAZ It's not the answers say here to turn a blind eye to illegal things: It's simply to learn from mistakes and move on, because pursuing that matter would not be worthy of the return-on-investment point of view. YMMV.

      – Sourav Ghosh
      10 hours ago







      @VLAZ It's not the answers say here to turn a blind eye to illegal things: It's simply to learn from mistakes and move on, because pursuing that matter would not be worthy of the return-on-investment point of view. YMMV.

      – Sourav Ghosh
      10 hours ago















      @SouravGhosh OK, let me quote something here "As long as the training is related to your profession and helps you make a better employee (and even also a human being), it's a part of the "job"." - it seems illegal to work on your offdays without compensation.

      – VLAZ
      10 hours ago





      @SouravGhosh OK, let me quote something here "As long as the training is related to your profession and helps you make a better employee (and even also a human being), it's a part of the "job"." - it seems illegal to work on your offdays without compensation.

      – VLAZ
      10 hours ago











      13














      No, this is not common among reputable management. Your boss knows darn well that they stiffed you and if they are this petty then trying to get that day back from them will uncover further levels of pettiness.





      Based on your previous question combined with this one I would suggest to just learn from this experience and move on.



      Besides, you have taken more sick days than allowed, right? Were you paid for all of those days? If so, then I would call it "even".





      Far too many people are willing to die on a molehill and if one is not readily available then they build their own.



      ^ Don't be one of these people.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 4





        Or use the same thing to your advantage. It's your last week at work, and suddenly you come down with a stomach bug which takes you out until Friday, when you finally make it in to fill in your leaving paperwork and claim those days off sick. Are they prepared to call you out and die on that molehill? Probably not.

        – Graham
        18 hours ago






      • 1





        @Graham Did you even read the other post from OP? Without your suggestion OP is just an ex employee that screwed up a little. With your suggestion OP is an ex employee which screwed up a little and is conniving. My answer seeks to avoid molehills and somehow several people have upvoted your comment because you've went ahead and created a molehill for OP; unbelievable.

        – MonkeyZeus
        5 hours ago













      • Not sure what your problem is. People upvoted the comment because it's a valid rephrasing of your point in the OP's favour. But if you're choosing to make this a molehill you want to fight over, then enjoy your molehill.

        – Graham
        3 hours ago











      • @Graham This isn't worth my time. Just know that your comment is an invalid rephrasing of my answer, not needed, and potentially detrimental advice for OP but feel free to continue thinking you've helped...

        – MonkeyZeus
        3 hours ago
















      13














      No, this is not common among reputable management. Your boss knows darn well that they stiffed you and if they are this petty then trying to get that day back from them will uncover further levels of pettiness.





      Based on your previous question combined with this one I would suggest to just learn from this experience and move on.



      Besides, you have taken more sick days than allowed, right? Were you paid for all of those days? If so, then I would call it "even".





      Far too many people are willing to die on a molehill and if one is not readily available then they build their own.



      ^ Don't be one of these people.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 4





        Or use the same thing to your advantage. It's your last week at work, and suddenly you come down with a stomach bug which takes you out until Friday, when you finally make it in to fill in your leaving paperwork and claim those days off sick. Are they prepared to call you out and die on that molehill? Probably not.

        – Graham
        18 hours ago






      • 1





        @Graham Did you even read the other post from OP? Without your suggestion OP is just an ex employee that screwed up a little. With your suggestion OP is an ex employee which screwed up a little and is conniving. My answer seeks to avoid molehills and somehow several people have upvoted your comment because you've went ahead and created a molehill for OP; unbelievable.

        – MonkeyZeus
        5 hours ago













      • Not sure what your problem is. People upvoted the comment because it's a valid rephrasing of your point in the OP's favour. But if you're choosing to make this a molehill you want to fight over, then enjoy your molehill.

        – Graham
        3 hours ago











      • @Graham This isn't worth my time. Just know that your comment is an invalid rephrasing of my answer, not needed, and potentially detrimental advice for OP but feel free to continue thinking you've helped...

        – MonkeyZeus
        3 hours ago














      13












      13








      13







      No, this is not common among reputable management. Your boss knows darn well that they stiffed you and if they are this petty then trying to get that day back from them will uncover further levels of pettiness.





      Based on your previous question combined with this one I would suggest to just learn from this experience and move on.



      Besides, you have taken more sick days than allowed, right? Were you paid for all of those days? If so, then I would call it "even".





      Far too many people are willing to die on a molehill and if one is not readily available then they build their own.



      ^ Don't be one of these people.






      share|improve this answer















      No, this is not common among reputable management. Your boss knows darn well that they stiffed you and if they are this petty then trying to get that day back from them will uncover further levels of pettiness.





      Based on your previous question combined with this one I would suggest to just learn from this experience and move on.



      Besides, you have taken more sick days than allowed, right? Were you paid for all of those days? If so, then I would call it "even".





      Far too many people are willing to die on a molehill and if one is not readily available then they build their own.



      ^ Don't be one of these people.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 5 hours ago

























      answered yesterday









      MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus

      4,22211130




      4,22211130








      • 4





        Or use the same thing to your advantage. It's your last week at work, and suddenly you come down with a stomach bug which takes you out until Friday, when you finally make it in to fill in your leaving paperwork and claim those days off sick. Are they prepared to call you out and die on that molehill? Probably not.

        – Graham
        18 hours ago






      • 1





        @Graham Did you even read the other post from OP? Without your suggestion OP is just an ex employee that screwed up a little. With your suggestion OP is an ex employee which screwed up a little and is conniving. My answer seeks to avoid molehills and somehow several people have upvoted your comment because you've went ahead and created a molehill for OP; unbelievable.

        – MonkeyZeus
        5 hours ago













      • Not sure what your problem is. People upvoted the comment because it's a valid rephrasing of your point in the OP's favour. But if you're choosing to make this a molehill you want to fight over, then enjoy your molehill.

        – Graham
        3 hours ago











      • @Graham This isn't worth my time. Just know that your comment is an invalid rephrasing of my answer, not needed, and potentially detrimental advice for OP but feel free to continue thinking you've helped...

        – MonkeyZeus
        3 hours ago














      • 4





        Or use the same thing to your advantage. It's your last week at work, and suddenly you come down with a stomach bug which takes you out until Friday, when you finally make it in to fill in your leaving paperwork and claim those days off sick. Are they prepared to call you out and die on that molehill? Probably not.

        – Graham
        18 hours ago






      • 1





        @Graham Did you even read the other post from OP? Without your suggestion OP is just an ex employee that screwed up a little. With your suggestion OP is an ex employee which screwed up a little and is conniving. My answer seeks to avoid molehills and somehow several people have upvoted your comment because you've went ahead and created a molehill for OP; unbelievable.

        – MonkeyZeus
        5 hours ago













      • Not sure what your problem is. People upvoted the comment because it's a valid rephrasing of your point in the OP's favour. But if you're choosing to make this a molehill you want to fight over, then enjoy your molehill.

        – Graham
        3 hours ago











      • @Graham This isn't worth my time. Just know that your comment is an invalid rephrasing of my answer, not needed, and potentially detrimental advice for OP but feel free to continue thinking you've helped...

        – MonkeyZeus
        3 hours ago








      4




      4





      Or use the same thing to your advantage. It's your last week at work, and suddenly you come down with a stomach bug which takes you out until Friday, when you finally make it in to fill in your leaving paperwork and claim those days off sick. Are they prepared to call you out and die on that molehill? Probably not.

      – Graham
      18 hours ago





      Or use the same thing to your advantage. It's your last week at work, and suddenly you come down with a stomach bug which takes you out until Friday, when you finally make it in to fill in your leaving paperwork and claim those days off sick. Are they prepared to call you out and die on that molehill? Probably not.

      – Graham
      18 hours ago




      1




      1





      @Graham Did you even read the other post from OP? Without your suggestion OP is just an ex employee that screwed up a little. With your suggestion OP is an ex employee which screwed up a little and is conniving. My answer seeks to avoid molehills and somehow several people have upvoted your comment because you've went ahead and created a molehill for OP; unbelievable.

      – MonkeyZeus
      5 hours ago







      @Graham Did you even read the other post from OP? Without your suggestion OP is just an ex employee that screwed up a little. With your suggestion OP is an ex employee which screwed up a little and is conniving. My answer seeks to avoid molehills and somehow several people have upvoted your comment because you've went ahead and created a molehill for OP; unbelievable.

      – MonkeyZeus
      5 hours ago















      Not sure what your problem is. People upvoted the comment because it's a valid rephrasing of your point in the OP's favour. But if you're choosing to make this a molehill you want to fight over, then enjoy your molehill.

      – Graham
      3 hours ago





      Not sure what your problem is. People upvoted the comment because it's a valid rephrasing of your point in the OP's favour. But if you're choosing to make this a molehill you want to fight over, then enjoy your molehill.

      – Graham
      3 hours ago













      @Graham This isn't worth my time. Just know that your comment is an invalid rephrasing of my answer, not needed, and potentially detrimental advice for OP but feel free to continue thinking you've helped...

      – MonkeyZeus
      3 hours ago





      @Graham This isn't worth my time. Just know that your comment is an invalid rephrasing of my answer, not needed, and potentially detrimental advice for OP but feel free to continue thinking you've helped...

      – MonkeyZeus
      3 hours ago











      8















      Today, I saw that the day of the class was still listed as a day off, and when I asked my boss about it, he said that I was not at work so it counts as a day off.



      Is this a common thing?




      No, absolutely not.




      I'm currently in my last week of work for this company.




      Well, that changes things. Did you really think your company would send to a class on company time in the last week you are working for them? What benefit to the company does you going to that class have?



      Your boss could have made it more clear to you that going to class would be in your own time -- but you should also have been more proactive and have asked for details (who pays for it, on whose time, etc) when he offered.






      share|improve this answer
























      • "Did you really think your company would send to a class on company time in the last week you are working for them?" that happened "around mid February" - about a month ago. The previous question from OP was also a month ago. It's not exactly clear, but very likely that the resignation wasn't submitted when the training happened. Or even if it was, then that makes it very odd to suggest the training.

        – VLAZ
        10 hours ago











      • @VLAZ: Compared to most countries, the Netherlands has very long_ notice periods. When resigning in February, the effective end date would typically be March 31st (last date of next month).

        – MSalters
        8 hours ago











      • @MSalters again I am basing this on the previous question - posted on the 20th of February 2019. The update from the 27th of February says "[my boss] would not renew my contract". OP now has 1 week left. It's unclear the dispute and the resolultion happened before or after the training but it seems a bit illogical to be before. Do you have anything to firmly suggest the training either a) happened the last week of employment b) was after the dispute?

        – VLAZ
        7 hours ago











      • @VLAZ: Looking at the linked question, it seems there's no resignation at all. That's not unusual in the Netherlands; you can have definite contracts - the most common ones being definite end date contracts.

        – MSalters
        7 hours ago











      • @MSalters yes, it was my bad to call it "resignation", when I meant "decision to leave the company". This question is still incorrect in suggesting a) this happened now instead of a month ago b) this happened before it was known OP would be leaving the company.

        – VLAZ
        7 hours ago
















      8















      Today, I saw that the day of the class was still listed as a day off, and when I asked my boss about it, he said that I was not at work so it counts as a day off.



      Is this a common thing?




      No, absolutely not.




      I'm currently in my last week of work for this company.




      Well, that changes things. Did you really think your company would send to a class on company time in the last week you are working for them? What benefit to the company does you going to that class have?



      Your boss could have made it more clear to you that going to class would be in your own time -- but you should also have been more proactive and have asked for details (who pays for it, on whose time, etc) when he offered.






      share|improve this answer
























      • "Did you really think your company would send to a class on company time in the last week you are working for them?" that happened "around mid February" - about a month ago. The previous question from OP was also a month ago. It's not exactly clear, but very likely that the resignation wasn't submitted when the training happened. Or even if it was, then that makes it very odd to suggest the training.

        – VLAZ
        10 hours ago











      • @VLAZ: Compared to most countries, the Netherlands has very long_ notice periods. When resigning in February, the effective end date would typically be March 31st (last date of next month).

        – MSalters
        8 hours ago











      • @MSalters again I am basing this on the previous question - posted on the 20th of February 2019. The update from the 27th of February says "[my boss] would not renew my contract". OP now has 1 week left. It's unclear the dispute and the resolultion happened before or after the training but it seems a bit illogical to be before. Do you have anything to firmly suggest the training either a) happened the last week of employment b) was after the dispute?

        – VLAZ
        7 hours ago











      • @VLAZ: Looking at the linked question, it seems there's no resignation at all. That's not unusual in the Netherlands; you can have definite contracts - the most common ones being definite end date contracts.

        – MSalters
        7 hours ago











      • @MSalters yes, it was my bad to call it "resignation", when I meant "decision to leave the company". This question is still incorrect in suggesting a) this happened now instead of a month ago b) this happened before it was known OP would be leaving the company.

        – VLAZ
        7 hours ago














      8












      8








      8








      Today, I saw that the day of the class was still listed as a day off, and when I asked my boss about it, he said that I was not at work so it counts as a day off.



      Is this a common thing?




      No, absolutely not.




      I'm currently in my last week of work for this company.




      Well, that changes things. Did you really think your company would send to a class on company time in the last week you are working for them? What benefit to the company does you going to that class have?



      Your boss could have made it more clear to you that going to class would be in your own time -- but you should also have been more proactive and have asked for details (who pays for it, on whose time, etc) when he offered.






      share|improve this answer














      Today, I saw that the day of the class was still listed as a day off, and when I asked my boss about it, he said that I was not at work so it counts as a day off.



      Is this a common thing?




      No, absolutely not.




      I'm currently in my last week of work for this company.




      Well, that changes things. Did you really think your company would send to a class on company time in the last week you are working for them? What benefit to the company does you going to that class have?



      Your boss could have made it more clear to you that going to class would be in your own time -- but you should also have been more proactive and have asked for details (who pays for it, on whose time, etc) when he offered.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 21 hours ago









      AbigailAbigail

      4,29821122




      4,29821122













      • "Did you really think your company would send to a class on company time in the last week you are working for them?" that happened "around mid February" - about a month ago. The previous question from OP was also a month ago. It's not exactly clear, but very likely that the resignation wasn't submitted when the training happened. Or even if it was, then that makes it very odd to suggest the training.

        – VLAZ
        10 hours ago











      • @VLAZ: Compared to most countries, the Netherlands has very long_ notice periods. When resigning in February, the effective end date would typically be March 31st (last date of next month).

        – MSalters
        8 hours ago











      • @MSalters again I am basing this on the previous question - posted on the 20th of February 2019. The update from the 27th of February says "[my boss] would not renew my contract". OP now has 1 week left. It's unclear the dispute and the resolultion happened before or after the training but it seems a bit illogical to be before. Do you have anything to firmly suggest the training either a) happened the last week of employment b) was after the dispute?

        – VLAZ
        7 hours ago











      • @VLAZ: Looking at the linked question, it seems there's no resignation at all. That's not unusual in the Netherlands; you can have definite contracts - the most common ones being definite end date contracts.

        – MSalters
        7 hours ago











      • @MSalters yes, it was my bad to call it "resignation", when I meant "decision to leave the company". This question is still incorrect in suggesting a) this happened now instead of a month ago b) this happened before it was known OP would be leaving the company.

        – VLAZ
        7 hours ago



















      • "Did you really think your company would send to a class on company time in the last week you are working for them?" that happened "around mid February" - about a month ago. The previous question from OP was also a month ago. It's not exactly clear, but very likely that the resignation wasn't submitted when the training happened. Or even if it was, then that makes it very odd to suggest the training.

        – VLAZ
        10 hours ago











      • @VLAZ: Compared to most countries, the Netherlands has very long_ notice periods. When resigning in February, the effective end date would typically be March 31st (last date of next month).

        – MSalters
        8 hours ago











      • @MSalters again I am basing this on the previous question - posted on the 20th of February 2019. The update from the 27th of February says "[my boss] would not renew my contract". OP now has 1 week left. It's unclear the dispute and the resolultion happened before or after the training but it seems a bit illogical to be before. Do you have anything to firmly suggest the training either a) happened the last week of employment b) was after the dispute?

        – VLAZ
        7 hours ago











      • @VLAZ: Looking at the linked question, it seems there's no resignation at all. That's not unusual in the Netherlands; you can have definite contracts - the most common ones being definite end date contracts.

        – MSalters
        7 hours ago











      • @MSalters yes, it was my bad to call it "resignation", when I meant "decision to leave the company". This question is still incorrect in suggesting a) this happened now instead of a month ago b) this happened before it was known OP would be leaving the company.

        – VLAZ
        7 hours ago

















      "Did you really think your company would send to a class on company time in the last week you are working for them?" that happened "around mid February" - about a month ago. The previous question from OP was also a month ago. It's not exactly clear, but very likely that the resignation wasn't submitted when the training happened. Or even if it was, then that makes it very odd to suggest the training.

      – VLAZ
      10 hours ago





      "Did you really think your company would send to a class on company time in the last week you are working for them?" that happened "around mid February" - about a month ago. The previous question from OP was also a month ago. It's not exactly clear, but very likely that the resignation wasn't submitted when the training happened. Or even if it was, then that makes it very odd to suggest the training.

      – VLAZ
      10 hours ago













      @VLAZ: Compared to most countries, the Netherlands has very long_ notice periods. When resigning in February, the effective end date would typically be March 31st (last date of next month).

      – MSalters
      8 hours ago





      @VLAZ: Compared to most countries, the Netherlands has very long_ notice periods. When resigning in February, the effective end date would typically be March 31st (last date of next month).

      – MSalters
      8 hours ago













      @MSalters again I am basing this on the previous question - posted on the 20th of February 2019. The update from the 27th of February says "[my boss] would not renew my contract". OP now has 1 week left. It's unclear the dispute and the resolultion happened before or after the training but it seems a bit illogical to be before. Do you have anything to firmly suggest the training either a) happened the last week of employment b) was after the dispute?

      – VLAZ
      7 hours ago





      @MSalters again I am basing this on the previous question - posted on the 20th of February 2019. The update from the 27th of February says "[my boss] would not renew my contract". OP now has 1 week left. It's unclear the dispute and the resolultion happened before or after the training but it seems a bit illogical to be before. Do you have anything to firmly suggest the training either a) happened the last week of employment b) was after the dispute?

      – VLAZ
      7 hours ago













      @VLAZ: Looking at the linked question, it seems there's no resignation at all. That's not unusual in the Netherlands; you can have definite contracts - the most common ones being definite end date contracts.

      – MSalters
      7 hours ago





      @VLAZ: Looking at the linked question, it seems there's no resignation at all. That's not unusual in the Netherlands; you can have definite contracts - the most common ones being definite end date contracts.

      – MSalters
      7 hours ago













      @MSalters yes, it was my bad to call it "resignation", when I meant "decision to leave the company". This question is still incorrect in suggesting a) this happened now instead of a month ago b) this happened before it was known OP would be leaving the company.

      – VLAZ
      7 hours ago





      @MSalters yes, it was my bad to call it "resignation", when I meant "decision to leave the company". This question is still incorrect in suggesting a) this happened now instead of a month ago b) this happened before it was known OP would be leaving the company.

      – VLAZ
      7 hours ago











      4














      Note: This answer applies to required education/courses to fulfill your agreement



      What your employer did is unlawful according to this. In the Netherlands there is a workplace law called "Scholingsplicht" that, summed up, says:




      An employer is required to make all necessary provisions for the employee to be able to do his/her job (fulfill the contract/agreement). This includes required additional education, courses, etc.




      In Dutch terminology, this also includes travel expenses (and any expenses you incur for your work), but these details can be found in your agreement (or CAO if applicable).



      Do note that the law does not say anything about paying your hourly wage, if you need assurance then the logical step is to setup and both sign a studiekostenovereenkomst where both parties agree on the terms of the additional courses, schooling, costs/salary etc.



      If you voluntarily can take the course, it is allowed to not count as "work".






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Gizmo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      • Actually, the first link states the exact opposite of what you claim. The employer gave a choice, which makes it voluntary and therefore not work time. Had it been required, then it would have been work time. You are right to refer to the CAO, because it can deviate from the default rules.

        – MSalters
        8 hours ago











      • @MSalters ah right! Skimmed a bit too fast :) Thanks for pointing out.

        – Gizmo
        8 hours ago













      • Also, IT so there's no CAO, and he's already resigned so you're not going to get a studiekostenovereenkomst either.

        – MSalters
        8 hours ago
















      4














      Note: This answer applies to required education/courses to fulfill your agreement



      What your employer did is unlawful according to this. In the Netherlands there is a workplace law called "Scholingsplicht" that, summed up, says:




      An employer is required to make all necessary provisions for the employee to be able to do his/her job (fulfill the contract/agreement). This includes required additional education, courses, etc.




      In Dutch terminology, this also includes travel expenses (and any expenses you incur for your work), but these details can be found in your agreement (or CAO if applicable).



      Do note that the law does not say anything about paying your hourly wage, if you need assurance then the logical step is to setup and both sign a studiekostenovereenkomst where both parties agree on the terms of the additional courses, schooling, costs/salary etc.



      If you voluntarily can take the course, it is allowed to not count as "work".






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Gizmo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      • Actually, the first link states the exact opposite of what you claim. The employer gave a choice, which makes it voluntary and therefore not work time. Had it been required, then it would have been work time. You are right to refer to the CAO, because it can deviate from the default rules.

        – MSalters
        8 hours ago











      • @MSalters ah right! Skimmed a bit too fast :) Thanks for pointing out.

        – Gizmo
        8 hours ago













      • Also, IT so there's no CAO, and he's already resigned so you're not going to get a studiekostenovereenkomst either.

        – MSalters
        8 hours ago














      4












      4








      4







      Note: This answer applies to required education/courses to fulfill your agreement



      What your employer did is unlawful according to this. In the Netherlands there is a workplace law called "Scholingsplicht" that, summed up, says:




      An employer is required to make all necessary provisions for the employee to be able to do his/her job (fulfill the contract/agreement). This includes required additional education, courses, etc.




      In Dutch terminology, this also includes travel expenses (and any expenses you incur for your work), but these details can be found in your agreement (or CAO if applicable).



      Do note that the law does not say anything about paying your hourly wage, if you need assurance then the logical step is to setup and both sign a studiekostenovereenkomst where both parties agree on the terms of the additional courses, schooling, costs/salary etc.



      If you voluntarily can take the course, it is allowed to not count as "work".






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Gizmo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      Note: This answer applies to required education/courses to fulfill your agreement



      What your employer did is unlawful according to this. In the Netherlands there is a workplace law called "Scholingsplicht" that, summed up, says:




      An employer is required to make all necessary provisions for the employee to be able to do his/her job (fulfill the contract/agreement). This includes required additional education, courses, etc.




      In Dutch terminology, this also includes travel expenses (and any expenses you incur for your work), but these details can be found in your agreement (or CAO if applicable).



      Do note that the law does not say anything about paying your hourly wage, if you need assurance then the logical step is to setup and both sign a studiekostenovereenkomst where both parties agree on the terms of the additional courses, schooling, costs/salary etc.



      If you voluntarily can take the course, it is allowed to not count as "work".







      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Gizmo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 8 hours ago





















      New contributor




      Gizmo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      answered 8 hours ago









      GizmoGizmo

      1493




      1493




      New contributor




      Gizmo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Gizmo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Gizmo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.













      • Actually, the first link states the exact opposite of what you claim. The employer gave a choice, which makes it voluntary and therefore not work time. Had it been required, then it would have been work time. You are right to refer to the CAO, because it can deviate from the default rules.

        – MSalters
        8 hours ago











      • @MSalters ah right! Skimmed a bit too fast :) Thanks for pointing out.

        – Gizmo
        8 hours ago













      • Also, IT so there's no CAO, and he's already resigned so you're not going to get a studiekostenovereenkomst either.

        – MSalters
        8 hours ago



















      • Actually, the first link states the exact opposite of what you claim. The employer gave a choice, which makes it voluntary and therefore not work time. Had it been required, then it would have been work time. You are right to refer to the CAO, because it can deviate from the default rules.

        – MSalters
        8 hours ago











      • @MSalters ah right! Skimmed a bit too fast :) Thanks for pointing out.

        – Gizmo
        8 hours ago













      • Also, IT so there's no CAO, and he's already resigned so you're not going to get a studiekostenovereenkomst either.

        – MSalters
        8 hours ago

















      Actually, the first link states the exact opposite of what you claim. The employer gave a choice, which makes it voluntary and therefore not work time. Had it been required, then it would have been work time. You are right to refer to the CAO, because it can deviate from the default rules.

      – MSalters
      8 hours ago





      Actually, the first link states the exact opposite of what you claim. The employer gave a choice, which makes it voluntary and therefore not work time. Had it been required, then it would have been work time. You are right to refer to the CAO, because it can deviate from the default rules.

      – MSalters
      8 hours ago













      @MSalters ah right! Skimmed a bit too fast :) Thanks for pointing out.

      – Gizmo
      8 hours ago







      @MSalters ah right! Skimmed a bit too fast :) Thanks for pointing out.

      – Gizmo
      8 hours ago















      Also, IT so there's no CAO, and he's already resigned so you're not going to get a studiekostenovereenkomst either.

      – MSalters
      8 hours ago





      Also, IT so there's no CAO, and he's already resigned so you're not going to get a studiekostenovereenkomst either.

      – MSalters
      8 hours ago











      3














      I will counter that it IS common in my area: Specifically, I am a contractor in the US, and it is common for employers to offer to pay the cost of training with the qualification that the time itself is unpaid. Larger companies may even have an education allowance. If you wanted to take a class during the week, you could use paid time off to fill the gap in your hours, so that your paycheck would not be reduced. (Often such classes are offered on the weekends anyway or we flex our hours to still fit in the same number of billable hours around our class.) These courses usually offer some certificate or similar that you can use as a justification for a pay increase.



      The main difference is that a reputable company is upfront about what can and cannot be charged! For example, "Come to corporate HQ for a meeting (charge 1 hour to overhead)." or "You are invited to our holiday party (no chargable time)." We also fill in time cards so our time is billed correctly, so it would be clear right away how much time you're charging and how much time you're taking as vacation.






      share|improve this answer
























      • Yes, this. Where I work this is also common for trainings or events where the employee wants to go. If the company would not normally send the employee, but employee would like to go, often the compromise will be "we will pay the event fee if you take time off to attend". Of course, if the employer wants you to go, it's work and thus paid.

        – sleske
        9 hours ago











      • If it is at the employer's behest it is legally considered 'work' in the USA and you are entitled to pay for hours worked. Contracting is different but contracting as you speak of it is mostly a thing because it's in the employer's favor, which this is an example of.

        – Adonalsium
        3 hours ago
















      3














      I will counter that it IS common in my area: Specifically, I am a contractor in the US, and it is common for employers to offer to pay the cost of training with the qualification that the time itself is unpaid. Larger companies may even have an education allowance. If you wanted to take a class during the week, you could use paid time off to fill the gap in your hours, so that your paycheck would not be reduced. (Often such classes are offered on the weekends anyway or we flex our hours to still fit in the same number of billable hours around our class.) These courses usually offer some certificate or similar that you can use as a justification for a pay increase.



      The main difference is that a reputable company is upfront about what can and cannot be charged! For example, "Come to corporate HQ for a meeting (charge 1 hour to overhead)." or "You are invited to our holiday party (no chargable time)." We also fill in time cards so our time is billed correctly, so it would be clear right away how much time you're charging and how much time you're taking as vacation.






      share|improve this answer
























      • Yes, this. Where I work this is also common for trainings or events where the employee wants to go. If the company would not normally send the employee, but employee would like to go, often the compromise will be "we will pay the event fee if you take time off to attend". Of course, if the employer wants you to go, it's work and thus paid.

        – sleske
        9 hours ago











      • If it is at the employer's behest it is legally considered 'work' in the USA and you are entitled to pay for hours worked. Contracting is different but contracting as you speak of it is mostly a thing because it's in the employer's favor, which this is an example of.

        – Adonalsium
        3 hours ago














      3












      3








      3







      I will counter that it IS common in my area: Specifically, I am a contractor in the US, and it is common for employers to offer to pay the cost of training with the qualification that the time itself is unpaid. Larger companies may even have an education allowance. If you wanted to take a class during the week, you could use paid time off to fill the gap in your hours, so that your paycheck would not be reduced. (Often such classes are offered on the weekends anyway or we flex our hours to still fit in the same number of billable hours around our class.) These courses usually offer some certificate or similar that you can use as a justification for a pay increase.



      The main difference is that a reputable company is upfront about what can and cannot be charged! For example, "Come to corporate HQ for a meeting (charge 1 hour to overhead)." or "You are invited to our holiday party (no chargable time)." We also fill in time cards so our time is billed correctly, so it would be clear right away how much time you're charging and how much time you're taking as vacation.






      share|improve this answer













      I will counter that it IS common in my area: Specifically, I am a contractor in the US, and it is common for employers to offer to pay the cost of training with the qualification that the time itself is unpaid. Larger companies may even have an education allowance. If you wanted to take a class during the week, you could use paid time off to fill the gap in your hours, so that your paycheck would not be reduced. (Often such classes are offered on the weekends anyway or we flex our hours to still fit in the same number of billable hours around our class.) These courses usually offer some certificate or similar that you can use as a justification for a pay increase.



      The main difference is that a reputable company is upfront about what can and cannot be charged! For example, "Come to corporate HQ for a meeting (charge 1 hour to overhead)." or "You are invited to our holiday party (no chargable time)." We also fill in time cards so our time is billed correctly, so it would be clear right away how much time you're charging and how much time you're taking as vacation.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 14 hours ago









      user3067860user3067860

      49648




      49648













      • Yes, this. Where I work this is also common for trainings or events where the employee wants to go. If the company would not normally send the employee, but employee would like to go, often the compromise will be "we will pay the event fee if you take time off to attend". Of course, if the employer wants you to go, it's work and thus paid.

        – sleske
        9 hours ago











      • If it is at the employer's behest it is legally considered 'work' in the USA and you are entitled to pay for hours worked. Contracting is different but contracting as you speak of it is mostly a thing because it's in the employer's favor, which this is an example of.

        – Adonalsium
        3 hours ago



















      • Yes, this. Where I work this is also common for trainings or events where the employee wants to go. If the company would not normally send the employee, but employee would like to go, often the compromise will be "we will pay the event fee if you take time off to attend". Of course, if the employer wants you to go, it's work and thus paid.

        – sleske
        9 hours ago











      • If it is at the employer's behest it is legally considered 'work' in the USA and you are entitled to pay for hours worked. Contracting is different but contracting as you speak of it is mostly a thing because it's in the employer's favor, which this is an example of.

        – Adonalsium
        3 hours ago

















      Yes, this. Where I work this is also common for trainings or events where the employee wants to go. If the company would not normally send the employee, but employee would like to go, often the compromise will be "we will pay the event fee if you take time off to attend". Of course, if the employer wants you to go, it's work and thus paid.

      – sleske
      9 hours ago





      Yes, this. Where I work this is also common for trainings or events where the employee wants to go. If the company would not normally send the employee, but employee would like to go, often the compromise will be "we will pay the event fee if you take time off to attend". Of course, if the employer wants you to go, it's work and thus paid.

      – sleske
      9 hours ago













      If it is at the employer's behest it is legally considered 'work' in the USA and you are entitled to pay for hours worked. Contracting is different but contracting as you speak of it is mostly a thing because it's in the employer's favor, which this is an example of.

      – Adonalsium
      3 hours ago





      If it is at the employer's behest it is legally considered 'work' in the USA and you are entitled to pay for hours worked. Contracting is different but contracting as you speak of it is mostly a thing because it's in the employer's favor, which this is an example of.

      – Adonalsium
      3 hours ago











      2














      As you work in a sector where getting a new decent job is quite easy, you still have "negotiation power". I would have a serious face-to-face conversation with my boss, explaining him the "misunderstanding" and the reasons why you are not happy about these events.



      Ask politely for the fair thing to be done. If he refuses, start looking for a new job, after all, if they can cheat you on one silly "day off", there may be plenty of other things where they will take advantage of you (if they aren't already)






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      asdf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.

























        2














        As you work in a sector where getting a new decent job is quite easy, you still have "negotiation power". I would have a serious face-to-face conversation with my boss, explaining him the "misunderstanding" and the reasons why you are not happy about these events.



        Ask politely for the fair thing to be done. If he refuses, start looking for a new job, after all, if they can cheat you on one silly "day off", there may be plenty of other things where they will take advantage of you (if they aren't already)






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        asdf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.























          2












          2








          2







          As you work in a sector where getting a new decent job is quite easy, you still have "negotiation power". I would have a serious face-to-face conversation with my boss, explaining him the "misunderstanding" and the reasons why you are not happy about these events.



          Ask politely for the fair thing to be done. If he refuses, start looking for a new job, after all, if they can cheat you on one silly "day off", there may be plenty of other things where they will take advantage of you (if they aren't already)






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          asdf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.










          As you work in a sector where getting a new decent job is quite easy, you still have "negotiation power". I would have a serious face-to-face conversation with my boss, explaining him the "misunderstanding" and the reasons why you are not happy about these events.



          Ask politely for the fair thing to be done. If he refuses, start looking for a new job, after all, if they can cheat you on one silly "day off", there may be plenty of other things where they will take advantage of you (if they aren't already)







          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          asdf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 20 hours ago









          Jacob M.

          58836




          58836






          New contributor




          asdf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered yesterday









          asdfasdf

          1813




          1813




          New contributor




          asdf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          asdf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          asdf is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.























              0














              Considering that you have already taken the course, I would recommend documenting that this should be counted as work and that this has been refused. Once you have left the company you can then inform the company that you will be pursuing them for the debt of the unpaid day's work.



              I am assuming that the Netherlands has some sort of small claims court which you could pursue the company through or an employment tribunal. Waiting until after you have left will avoid any blow back. Hopefully they will not contest it and compensate you once you suggest legal avenues.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              user101970 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





















              • No "small claims court", but the regular courts do have a simplified procedure (no lawyer required) for small claims.

                – MSalters
                8 hours ago
















              0














              Considering that you have already taken the course, I would recommend documenting that this should be counted as work and that this has been refused. Once you have left the company you can then inform the company that you will be pursuing them for the debt of the unpaid day's work.



              I am assuming that the Netherlands has some sort of small claims court which you could pursue the company through or an employment tribunal. Waiting until after you have left will avoid any blow back. Hopefully they will not contest it and compensate you once you suggest legal avenues.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              user101970 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





















              • No "small claims court", but the regular courts do have a simplified procedure (no lawyer required) for small claims.

                – MSalters
                8 hours ago














              0












              0








              0







              Considering that you have already taken the course, I would recommend documenting that this should be counted as work and that this has been refused. Once you have left the company you can then inform the company that you will be pursuing them for the debt of the unpaid day's work.



              I am assuming that the Netherlands has some sort of small claims court which you could pursue the company through or an employment tribunal. Waiting until after you have left will avoid any blow back. Hopefully they will not contest it and compensate you once you suggest legal avenues.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              user101970 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.










              Considering that you have already taken the course, I would recommend documenting that this should be counted as work and that this has been refused. Once you have left the company you can then inform the company that you will be pursuing them for the debt of the unpaid day's work.



              I am assuming that the Netherlands has some sort of small claims court which you could pursue the company through or an employment tribunal. Waiting until after you have left will avoid any blow back. Hopefully they will not contest it and compensate you once you suggest legal avenues.







              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              user101970 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer






              New contributor




              user101970 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              answered 8 hours ago









              user101970user101970

              1




              1




              New contributor




              user101970 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              New contributor





              user101970 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              user101970 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.













              • No "small claims court", but the regular courts do have a simplified procedure (no lawyer required) for small claims.

                – MSalters
                8 hours ago



















              • No "small claims court", but the regular courts do have a simplified procedure (no lawyer required) for small claims.

                – MSalters
                8 hours ago

















              No "small claims court", but the regular courts do have a simplified procedure (no lawyer required) for small claims.

              – MSalters
              8 hours ago





              No "small claims court", but the regular courts do have a simplified procedure (no lawyer required) for small claims.

              – MSalters
              8 hours ago











              0














              In your case they paid for a class for a resigned employee, one that you liked and found greatly informative. I'd be careful about accusing them of taking advantage of you.



              Your title says that they asked you to take the class, your description say that they asked you if you wanted to take the class. That's a very significant difference.



              I've definitely had deals with employers where we split the voluntary investment on the growth of my personal skills and I don't see anything strange with that. They can pay for the conference fee and the days off, while I pay for the travel and accommodation for example.



              You should have asked for clarification if you expected to get paid for the time as well. Especially since you've already resigned.






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                In your case they paid for a class for a resigned employee, one that you liked and found greatly informative. I'd be careful about accusing them of taking advantage of you.



                Your title says that they asked you to take the class, your description say that they asked you if you wanted to take the class. That's a very significant difference.



                I've definitely had deals with employers where we split the voluntary investment on the growth of my personal skills and I don't see anything strange with that. They can pay for the conference fee and the days off, while I pay for the travel and accommodation for example.



                You should have asked for clarification if you expected to get paid for the time as well. Especially since you've already resigned.






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  In your case they paid for a class for a resigned employee, one that you liked and found greatly informative. I'd be careful about accusing them of taking advantage of you.



                  Your title says that they asked you to take the class, your description say that they asked you if you wanted to take the class. That's a very significant difference.



                  I've definitely had deals with employers where we split the voluntary investment on the growth of my personal skills and I don't see anything strange with that. They can pay for the conference fee and the days off, while I pay for the travel and accommodation for example.



                  You should have asked for clarification if you expected to get paid for the time as well. Especially since you've already resigned.






                  share|improve this answer













                  In your case they paid for a class for a resigned employee, one that you liked and found greatly informative. I'd be careful about accusing them of taking advantage of you.



                  Your title says that they asked you to take the class, your description say that they asked you if you wanted to take the class. That's a very significant difference.



                  I've definitely had deals with employers where we split the voluntary investment on the growth of my personal skills and I don't see anything strange with that. They can pay for the conference fee and the days off, while I pay for the travel and accommodation for example.



                  You should have asked for clarification if you expected to get paid for the time as well. Especially since you've already resigned.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 6 hours ago









                  AlexAlex

                  1365




                  1365























                      -2















                      Is this a common thing?
                      I work/live in the Netherlands and my field of work is IT.




                      Yes, in the Netherlands it is common practice to do courses, trainings and/or educations in your own time (days off) on the costs of your boss. If the course is not obligatory, but voluntary applied for or agreed upon. However, this practice usually tends to happen within smaller companies and companies that are not financially stable.



                      Take my talk on law with a grain of salt, I am not a lawyer, but I am the owner of a IT company in the Netherlands



                      Unless described differently in a CAO (which more often, if not always, is not the case in Dutch IT companies) or in your Contract.



                      The Dutch law differentiates between obligatory courses, and voluntarily courses.
                      If the course was mandatory, they would have to respect the fact that your time off, is your time off. And would have to either pay your for the hours spend, or compensate you by the means of hours off.



                      However, if you voluntarily agreed to take the course in your spare time. Which is what I am assuming by the phrasing of your very first paragraph. Then the company is not obliged to pay for the time, or give you time off in return. This because you could have spend the time in other ways.






                      share|improve this answer



















                      • 1





                        I work in IT in the Netherlands (10+ years) and not ever did I have to take a day off to follow a training/course during office hours. Especially not if my boss would offer it. Only community organised events (during evenings), I had to do in my own time. They are also 100% optional. I wouldn't say this is common practice.

                        – Caroline
                        6 hours ago













                      • @Caroline I've worked in IT for ~ 10 years now as well, and can say most of these companies with the exception of 2, did not pay for hours, or return free time when it was a optional course. Now as a company owner of a small IT company, I must say I do actually respect it as work hours. Non the less, I would not be obligated too.

                        – DXM
                        5 hours ago
















                      -2















                      Is this a common thing?
                      I work/live in the Netherlands and my field of work is IT.




                      Yes, in the Netherlands it is common practice to do courses, trainings and/or educations in your own time (days off) on the costs of your boss. If the course is not obligatory, but voluntary applied for or agreed upon. However, this practice usually tends to happen within smaller companies and companies that are not financially stable.



                      Take my talk on law with a grain of salt, I am not a lawyer, but I am the owner of a IT company in the Netherlands



                      Unless described differently in a CAO (which more often, if not always, is not the case in Dutch IT companies) or in your Contract.



                      The Dutch law differentiates between obligatory courses, and voluntarily courses.
                      If the course was mandatory, they would have to respect the fact that your time off, is your time off. And would have to either pay your for the hours spend, or compensate you by the means of hours off.



                      However, if you voluntarily agreed to take the course in your spare time. Which is what I am assuming by the phrasing of your very first paragraph. Then the company is not obliged to pay for the time, or give you time off in return. This because you could have spend the time in other ways.






                      share|improve this answer



















                      • 1





                        I work in IT in the Netherlands (10+ years) and not ever did I have to take a day off to follow a training/course during office hours. Especially not if my boss would offer it. Only community organised events (during evenings), I had to do in my own time. They are also 100% optional. I wouldn't say this is common practice.

                        – Caroline
                        6 hours ago













                      • @Caroline I've worked in IT for ~ 10 years now as well, and can say most of these companies with the exception of 2, did not pay for hours, or return free time when it was a optional course. Now as a company owner of a small IT company, I must say I do actually respect it as work hours. Non the less, I would not be obligated too.

                        – DXM
                        5 hours ago














                      -2












                      -2








                      -2








                      Is this a common thing?
                      I work/live in the Netherlands and my field of work is IT.




                      Yes, in the Netherlands it is common practice to do courses, trainings and/or educations in your own time (days off) on the costs of your boss. If the course is not obligatory, but voluntary applied for or agreed upon. However, this practice usually tends to happen within smaller companies and companies that are not financially stable.



                      Take my talk on law with a grain of salt, I am not a lawyer, but I am the owner of a IT company in the Netherlands



                      Unless described differently in a CAO (which more often, if not always, is not the case in Dutch IT companies) or in your Contract.



                      The Dutch law differentiates between obligatory courses, and voluntarily courses.
                      If the course was mandatory, they would have to respect the fact that your time off, is your time off. And would have to either pay your for the hours spend, or compensate you by the means of hours off.



                      However, if you voluntarily agreed to take the course in your spare time. Which is what I am assuming by the phrasing of your very first paragraph. Then the company is not obliged to pay for the time, or give you time off in return. This because you could have spend the time in other ways.






                      share|improve this answer














                      Is this a common thing?
                      I work/live in the Netherlands and my field of work is IT.




                      Yes, in the Netherlands it is common practice to do courses, trainings and/or educations in your own time (days off) on the costs of your boss. If the course is not obligatory, but voluntary applied for or agreed upon. However, this practice usually tends to happen within smaller companies and companies that are not financially stable.



                      Take my talk on law with a grain of salt, I am not a lawyer, but I am the owner of a IT company in the Netherlands



                      Unless described differently in a CAO (which more often, if not always, is not the case in Dutch IT companies) or in your Contract.



                      The Dutch law differentiates between obligatory courses, and voluntarily courses.
                      If the course was mandatory, they would have to respect the fact that your time off, is your time off. And would have to either pay your for the hours spend, or compensate you by the means of hours off.



                      However, if you voluntarily agreed to take the course in your spare time. Which is what I am assuming by the phrasing of your very first paragraph. Then the company is not obliged to pay for the time, or give you time off in return. This because you could have spend the time in other ways.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 6 hours ago









                      DXMDXM

                      1105




                      1105








                      • 1





                        I work in IT in the Netherlands (10+ years) and not ever did I have to take a day off to follow a training/course during office hours. Especially not if my boss would offer it. Only community organised events (during evenings), I had to do in my own time. They are also 100% optional. I wouldn't say this is common practice.

                        – Caroline
                        6 hours ago













                      • @Caroline I've worked in IT for ~ 10 years now as well, and can say most of these companies with the exception of 2, did not pay for hours, or return free time when it was a optional course. Now as a company owner of a small IT company, I must say I do actually respect it as work hours. Non the less, I would not be obligated too.

                        – DXM
                        5 hours ago














                      • 1





                        I work in IT in the Netherlands (10+ years) and not ever did I have to take a day off to follow a training/course during office hours. Especially not if my boss would offer it. Only community organised events (during evenings), I had to do in my own time. They are also 100% optional. I wouldn't say this is common practice.

                        – Caroline
                        6 hours ago













                      • @Caroline I've worked in IT for ~ 10 years now as well, and can say most of these companies with the exception of 2, did not pay for hours, or return free time when it was a optional course. Now as a company owner of a small IT company, I must say I do actually respect it as work hours. Non the less, I would not be obligated too.

                        – DXM
                        5 hours ago








                      1




                      1





                      I work in IT in the Netherlands (10+ years) and not ever did I have to take a day off to follow a training/course during office hours. Especially not if my boss would offer it. Only community organised events (during evenings), I had to do in my own time. They are also 100% optional. I wouldn't say this is common practice.

                      – Caroline
                      6 hours ago







                      I work in IT in the Netherlands (10+ years) and not ever did I have to take a day off to follow a training/course during office hours. Especially not if my boss would offer it. Only community organised events (during evenings), I had to do in my own time. They are also 100% optional. I wouldn't say this is common practice.

                      – Caroline
                      6 hours ago















                      @Caroline I've worked in IT for ~ 10 years now as well, and can say most of these companies with the exception of 2, did not pay for hours, or return free time when it was a optional course. Now as a company owner of a small IT company, I must say I do actually respect it as work hours. Non the less, I would not be obligated too.

                      – DXM
                      5 hours ago





                      @Caroline I've worked in IT for ~ 10 years now as well, and can say most of these companies with the exception of 2, did not pay for hours, or return free time when it was a optional course. Now as a company owner of a small IT company, I must say I do actually respect it as work hours. Non the less, I would not be obligated too.

                      – DXM
                      5 hours ago











                      -3














                      In the Netherlands I noticed that nowadays this is quite common. Ever since the bank managers moved away from banks to other parts of the world (which started happening after the bank crisis of 2008) we can notice such behaviour more and more.



                      The sad thing is that in the Netherlands at least you find politics always side with the managers, so if you even bring this up the laws will be changed to favour your manager before you get any money.



                      Sure it is not right, but it happens and you have to learn to live with it and make the best out of the given situation we are in.






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • This reads more like a rant than an answer. And as a Dutch person living abroad, I can assure you employees are well protected in the Netherlands, compared to elsewhere.

                        – Sebastiaan van den Broek
                        13 hours ago
















                      -3














                      In the Netherlands I noticed that nowadays this is quite common. Ever since the bank managers moved away from banks to other parts of the world (which started happening after the bank crisis of 2008) we can notice such behaviour more and more.



                      The sad thing is that in the Netherlands at least you find politics always side with the managers, so if you even bring this up the laws will be changed to favour your manager before you get any money.



                      Sure it is not right, but it happens and you have to learn to live with it and make the best out of the given situation we are in.






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • This reads more like a rant than an answer. And as a Dutch person living abroad, I can assure you employees are well protected in the Netherlands, compared to elsewhere.

                        – Sebastiaan van den Broek
                        13 hours ago














                      -3












                      -3








                      -3







                      In the Netherlands I noticed that nowadays this is quite common. Ever since the bank managers moved away from banks to other parts of the world (which started happening after the bank crisis of 2008) we can notice such behaviour more and more.



                      The sad thing is that in the Netherlands at least you find politics always side with the managers, so if you even bring this up the laws will be changed to favour your manager before you get any money.



                      Sure it is not right, but it happens and you have to learn to live with it and make the best out of the given situation we are in.






                      share|improve this answer













                      In the Netherlands I noticed that nowadays this is quite common. Ever since the bank managers moved away from banks to other parts of the world (which started happening after the bank crisis of 2008) we can notice such behaviour more and more.



                      The sad thing is that in the Netherlands at least you find politics always side with the managers, so if you even bring this up the laws will be changed to favour your manager before you get any money.



                      Sure it is not right, but it happens and you have to learn to live with it and make the best out of the given situation we are in.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 16 hours ago









                      paul23paul23

                      1183




                      1183













                      • This reads more like a rant than an answer. And as a Dutch person living abroad, I can assure you employees are well protected in the Netherlands, compared to elsewhere.

                        – Sebastiaan van den Broek
                        13 hours ago



















                      • This reads more like a rant than an answer. And as a Dutch person living abroad, I can assure you employees are well protected in the Netherlands, compared to elsewhere.

                        – Sebastiaan van den Broek
                        13 hours ago

















                      This reads more like a rant than an answer. And as a Dutch person living abroad, I can assure you employees are well protected in the Netherlands, compared to elsewhere.

                      – Sebastiaan van den Broek
                      13 hours ago





                      This reads more like a rant than an answer. And as a Dutch person living abroad, I can assure you employees are well protected in the Netherlands, compared to elsewhere.

                      – Sebastiaan van den Broek
                      13 hours ago



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                      He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                      Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029