How to politely tell someone they did not hit “reply to all” in an email?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
It happens sometimes that somebody (likely) meant to reply all in an email chain, but (likely) accidentally just replied to the last person that sent the email. What is a polite way to inform them of this/ask if they actually intended to reply all?
communication email
asked May 21 at 15:08
bill999bill999
3671 gold badge2 silver badges7 bronze badges
add a comment |
It happens sometimes that somebody (likely) meant to reply all in an email chain, but (likely) accidentally just replied to the last person that sent the email. What is a polite way to inform them of this/ask if they actually intended to reply all?
communication email
asked May 21 at 15:08
bill999bill999
3671 gold badge2 silver badges7 bronze badges
2
And you are confident they did not Reply with all moved to BCC?
– TafT
May 24 at 7:36
add a comment |
It happens sometimes that somebody (likely) meant to reply all in an email chain, but (likely) accidentally just replied to the last person that sent the email. What is a polite way to inform them of this/ask if they actually intended to reply all?
communication email
asked May 21 at 15:08
bill999bill999
3671 gold badge2 silver badges7 bronze badges
It happens sometimes that somebody (likely) meant to reply all in an email chain, but (likely) accidentally just replied to the last person that sent the email. What is a polite way to inform them of this/ask if they actually intended to reply all?
communication email
communication email
asked May 21 at 15:08
bill999bill999
3671 gold badge2 silver badges7 bronze badges
asked May 21 at 15:08
bill999bill999
3671 gold badge2 silver badges7 bronze badges
edited May 22 at 13:07
bill999
asked May 21 at 15:08
bill999bill999
3671 gold badge2 silver badges7 bronze badges
asked May 21 at 15:08
bill999bill999
3671 gold badge2 silver badges7 bronze badges
asked May 21 at 15:08
bill999bill999
3671 gold badge2 silver badges7 bronze badges
3671 gold badge2 silver badges7 bronze badges
2
And you are confident they did not Reply with all moved to BCC?
– TafT
May 24 at 7:36
add a comment |
2
And you are confident they did not Reply with all moved to BCC?
– TafT
May 24 at 7:36
2
2
And you are confident they did not Reply with all moved to BCC?
– TafT
May 24 at 7:36
And you are confident they did not Reply with all moved to BCC?
– TafT
May 24 at 7:36
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
Hi Bob - just so you're aware, seems like you haven't hit reply all there.
No need to dress it up any more than that.
answered May 21 at 15:11
berry120berry120
22.2k14 gold badges44 silver badges79 bronze badges
19
Short and concise. It's not polite to waste people's time with a lengthy email that could have been one sentence or less.
– Aaron
May 22 at 13:17
91
Okay but what if his name isn't Bob
– Sombrero Chicken
May 22 at 20:46
49
@SombreroChicken You should of course call him (or her) Bob anyway, following my answer exactly, and not changing it in the slightest to fit the situation ;)
– berry120
May 22 at 21:10
34
And be sure to sign off as berry120.
– TonyK
May 22 at 22:12
14
The Bob part is necessary because when people try to get too chummy you need to occasionally call them by the wrong name to let them know that you don't really care. Unless their name is Bob of course.
– Broots Waymb
May 23 at 13:45
|
show 6 more comments
Be straightforward.
I'm assuming, in this case, you were the last sender and by clicking the "reply" button, you are the only one who got that email. Then, One way could be, reply to the email which was only sent to you and inform them about the mistake like
Hey, did you mean to reply-to-all?
That should do just fine, no need to overthink it.
Considering another case:
Where you were not the last sender, you were missed in the email whereas, the intention was to have you (and others) in loop.
You may have received the update from someone else and upon "investigation" you discovered it was probably because of the mix up in "reply" vs. "reply all".
In that case, probably the best way out is to reply to the original thread and request for any update. If it was a genuine mistake from the sender, you should see the email they sent out previously to be forwarded to the entire recipient list pretty soon.
answered May 21 at 15:10
Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh
22k22 gold badges105 silver badges129 bronze badges
@Will Thanks for being that guy. :) (Actually, me goes and sulks in a corner)
– Sourav Ghosh
May 22 at 11:08
2
@Will In C#, it is perfectly fine to use?.(at some point) haha
– Rafalon
May 22 at 11:13
add a comment |
If you are quite confident they simply made a mistake, save them the time and effort of resending. Just reply-all yourself, and say something like
Copying everyone else in on this message
answered May 22 at 2:25
ArteliusArtelius
1,2136 silver badges10 bronze badges
3
Pretty much everybody does this after a year or two. It's up to the sender to call "eyes only".
– mckenzm
May 22 at 4:44
8
It may not be appropriate in some more formal threads were clear visibility of who wrote what is important - forwarded citation may be hidden, and email coming from wrong person may be ignored. In these sensitive cases, e.g. if the sender is your manager, and attention of someone higher in the chain is needed, asking the author to re-send the email correctly is safer. In usual, everyday cases - yeah, re-sending the message yourself is the simplest option.
– Frax
May 22 at 14:23
1
Meanwhile, while you're "saving them the time and effort", the original sender has realized their mistake and already re-sent the e-mail to everyone, "helpfully" omitting you the second time around so you don't get duplicate messages. Now everyone except you has been spammed with the same message twice.
– jmbpiano
May 23 at 18:46
add a comment |
You can say something polite like:
It looks you intended this email for all of us, and I'm guessing you meant to hit Reply All?
To avoid problems like this, I would like to share a handy email habit that I learned about at a previous workplace. Here it is: when someone in the team adds new people in an email thread, they would start the email body with a sentence like this:
[CC Bob Smith, Alice Jackson]
Because changes in the CC field are very easy to miss in most email interfaces, this would point out the change and indicate that the change was intentional.
Similarly, if someone removed people from the To: or CC: fields, they would start the email body with a sentence like this:
[To Alex only]
Again, that points out the change to a reader who might have missed it, and indicates that the change was intentional.
If the people in your workplace are in the habit of using a system like this, it makes it obvious when somebody accidentally hits Reply instead of Reply All, and you can confidently add back missing email thread participants without needing to ask permission first.
answered May 23 at 12:50
FlimmFlimm
1213 bronze badges
While this sounds like it could be a positive change, how would you suggest the OP introduces it to, and gets buy in from, their team?
– Player One
May 23 at 13:03
@PlayerOne Just start using it and see if the habit spreads. Nobody imposed it on me, I just picked this up. I don't want to stray too far from the original question so I don't think I should elaborate more in the answer post.
– Flimm
May 23 at 14:07
add a comment |
It seems some people didn't get the message, let's include them now.
That way you aren't blaming anyone. It's also useful when by mistake a certain individual gets taken out from the conversation and then you can say
Just including XY in the conversation, it seems he didn't get some of the messages.
Again, not blaming anyone, even though a perceptive person will be able to see who made the mistake in the conversation chain.
answered May 22 at 14:24
stackzebrastackzebra
1091 bronze badge
add a comment |
What I personally do, is if I think that the original respondents would benefit from the email, I either forward the email to them or reply to the email saying something like thanks and add the other intended recipients.
No need to do anything that can be taken negatively and there is a possibility that the respondent will understand that the others would have benefited from his email.
answered May 22 at 22:52
Al rlAl rl
212 bronze badges
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: false,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136976%2fhow-to-politely-tell-someone-they-did-not-hit-reply-to-all-in-an-email%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(function () {
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
var showEditor = function() {
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
};
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True') {
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup({
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup) {
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
}
})
} else{
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
showEditor();
}
}
});
});
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Hi Bob - just so you're aware, seems like you haven't hit reply all there.
No need to dress it up any more than that.
answered May 21 at 15:11
berry120berry120
22.2k14 gold badges44 silver badges79 bronze badges
19
Short and concise. It's not polite to waste people's time with a lengthy email that could have been one sentence or less.
– Aaron
May 22 at 13:17
91
Okay but what if his name isn't Bob
– Sombrero Chicken
May 22 at 20:46
49
@SombreroChicken You should of course call him (or her) Bob anyway, following my answer exactly, and not changing it in the slightest to fit the situation ;)
– berry120
May 22 at 21:10
34
And be sure to sign off as berry120.
– TonyK
May 22 at 22:12
14
The Bob part is necessary because when people try to get too chummy you need to occasionally call them by the wrong name to let them know that you don't really care. Unless their name is Bob of course.
– Broots Waymb
May 23 at 13:45
|
show 6 more comments
Hi Bob - just so you're aware, seems like you haven't hit reply all there.
No need to dress it up any more than that.
answered May 21 at 15:11
berry120berry120
22.2k14 gold badges44 silver badges79 bronze badges
19
Short and concise. It's not polite to waste people's time with a lengthy email that could have been one sentence or less.
– Aaron
May 22 at 13:17
91
Okay but what if his name isn't Bob
– Sombrero Chicken
May 22 at 20:46
49
@SombreroChicken You should of course call him (or her) Bob anyway, following my answer exactly, and not changing it in the slightest to fit the situation ;)
– berry120
May 22 at 21:10
34
And be sure to sign off as berry120.
– TonyK
May 22 at 22:12
14
The Bob part is necessary because when people try to get too chummy you need to occasionally call them by the wrong name to let them know that you don't really care. Unless their name is Bob of course.
– Broots Waymb
May 23 at 13:45
|
show 6 more comments
Hi Bob - just so you're aware, seems like you haven't hit reply all there.
No need to dress it up any more than that.
answered May 21 at 15:11
berry120berry120
22.2k14 gold badges44 silver badges79 bronze badges
Hi Bob - just so you're aware, seems like you haven't hit reply all there.
No need to dress it up any more than that.
answered May 21 at 15:11
berry120berry120
22.2k14 gold badges44 silver badges79 bronze badges
answered May 21 at 15:11
berry120berry120
22.2k14 gold badges44 silver badges79 bronze badges
answered May 21 at 15:11
berry120berry120
22.2k14 gold badges44 silver badges79 bronze badges
answered May 21 at 15:11
berry120berry120
22.2k14 gold badges44 silver badges79 bronze badges
22.2k14 gold badges44 silver badges79 bronze badges
19
Short and concise. It's not polite to waste people's time with a lengthy email that could have been one sentence or less.
– Aaron
May 22 at 13:17
91
Okay but what if his name isn't Bob
– Sombrero Chicken
May 22 at 20:46
49
@SombreroChicken You should of course call him (or her) Bob anyway, following my answer exactly, and not changing it in the slightest to fit the situation ;)
– berry120
May 22 at 21:10
34
And be sure to sign off as berry120.
– TonyK
May 22 at 22:12
14
The Bob part is necessary because when people try to get too chummy you need to occasionally call them by the wrong name to let them know that you don't really care. Unless their name is Bob of course.
– Broots Waymb
May 23 at 13:45
|
show 6 more comments
19
Short and concise. It's not polite to waste people's time with a lengthy email that could have been one sentence or less.
– Aaron
May 22 at 13:17
91
Okay but what if his name isn't Bob
– Sombrero Chicken
May 22 at 20:46
49
@SombreroChicken You should of course call him (or her) Bob anyway, following my answer exactly, and not changing it in the slightest to fit the situation ;)
– berry120
May 22 at 21:10
34
And be sure to sign off as berry120.
– TonyK
May 22 at 22:12
14
The Bob part is necessary because when people try to get too chummy you need to occasionally call them by the wrong name to let them know that you don't really care. Unless their name is Bob of course.
– Broots Waymb
May 23 at 13:45
19
19
Short and concise. It's not polite to waste people's time with a lengthy email that could have been one sentence or less.
– Aaron
May 22 at 13:17
Short and concise. It's not polite to waste people's time with a lengthy email that could have been one sentence or less.
– Aaron
May 22 at 13:17
91
91
Okay but what if his name isn't Bob
– Sombrero Chicken
May 22 at 20:46
Okay but what if his name isn't Bob
– Sombrero Chicken
May 22 at 20:46
49
49
@SombreroChicken You should of course call him (or her) Bob anyway, following my answer exactly, and not changing it in the slightest to fit the situation ;)
– berry120
May 22 at 21:10
@SombreroChicken You should of course call him (or her) Bob anyway, following my answer exactly, and not changing it in the slightest to fit the situation ;)
– berry120
May 22 at 21:10
34
34
And be sure to sign off as berry120.
– TonyK
May 22 at 22:12
And be sure to sign off as berry120.
– TonyK
May 22 at 22:12
14
14
The Bob part is necessary because when people try to get too chummy you need to occasionally call them by the wrong name to let them know that you don't really care. Unless their name is Bob of course.
– Broots Waymb
May 23 at 13:45
The Bob part is necessary because when people try to get too chummy you need to occasionally call them by the wrong name to let them know that you don't really care. Unless their name is Bob of course.
– Broots Waymb
May 23 at 13:45
|
show 6 more comments
Be straightforward.
I'm assuming, in this case, you were the last sender and by clicking the "reply" button, you are the only one who got that email. Then, One way could be, reply to the email which was only sent to you and inform them about the mistake like
Hey, did you mean to reply-to-all?
That should do just fine, no need to overthink it.
Considering another case:
Where you were not the last sender, you were missed in the email whereas, the intention was to have you (and others) in loop.
You may have received the update from someone else and upon "investigation" you discovered it was probably because of the mix up in "reply" vs. "reply all".
In that case, probably the best way out is to reply to the original thread and request for any update. If it was a genuine mistake from the sender, you should see the email they sent out previously to be forwarded to the entire recipient list pretty soon.
answered May 21 at 15:10
Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh
22k22 gold badges105 silver badges129 bronze badges
@Will Thanks for being that guy. :) (Actually, me goes and sulks in a corner)
– Sourav Ghosh
May 22 at 11:08
2
@Will In C#, it is perfectly fine to use?.(at some point) haha
– Rafalon
May 22 at 11:13
add a comment |
Be straightforward.
I'm assuming, in this case, you were the last sender and by clicking the "reply" button, you are the only one who got that email. Then, One way could be, reply to the email which was only sent to you and inform them about the mistake like
Hey, did you mean to reply-to-all?
That should do just fine, no need to overthink it.
Considering another case:
Where you were not the last sender, you were missed in the email whereas, the intention was to have you (and others) in loop.
You may have received the update from someone else and upon "investigation" you discovered it was probably because of the mix up in "reply" vs. "reply all".
In that case, probably the best way out is to reply to the original thread and request for any update. If it was a genuine mistake from the sender, you should see the email they sent out previously to be forwarded to the entire recipient list pretty soon.
answered May 21 at 15:10
Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh
22k22 gold badges105 silver badges129 bronze badges
@Will Thanks for being that guy. :) (Actually, me goes and sulks in a corner)
– Sourav Ghosh
May 22 at 11:08
2
@Will In C#, it is perfectly fine to use?.(at some point) haha
– Rafalon
May 22 at 11:13
add a comment |
Be straightforward.
I'm assuming, in this case, you were the last sender and by clicking the "reply" button, you are the only one who got that email. Then, One way could be, reply to the email which was only sent to you and inform them about the mistake like
Hey, did you mean to reply-to-all?
That should do just fine, no need to overthink it.
Considering another case:
Where you were not the last sender, you were missed in the email whereas, the intention was to have you (and others) in loop.
You may have received the update from someone else and upon "investigation" you discovered it was probably because of the mix up in "reply" vs. "reply all".
In that case, probably the best way out is to reply to the original thread and request for any update. If it was a genuine mistake from the sender, you should see the email they sent out previously to be forwarded to the entire recipient list pretty soon.
answered May 21 at 15:10
Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh
22k22 gold badges105 silver badges129 bronze badges
Be straightforward.
I'm assuming, in this case, you were the last sender and by clicking the "reply" button, you are the only one who got that email. Then, One way could be, reply to the email which was only sent to you and inform them about the mistake like
Hey, did you mean to reply-to-all?
That should do just fine, no need to overthink it.
Considering another case:
Where you were not the last sender, you were missed in the email whereas, the intention was to have you (and others) in loop.
You may have received the update from someone else and upon "investigation" you discovered it was probably because of the mix up in "reply" vs. "reply all".
In that case, probably the best way out is to reply to the original thread and request for any update. If it was a genuine mistake from the sender, you should see the email they sent out previously to be forwarded to the entire recipient list pretty soon.
answered May 21 at 15:10
Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh
22k22 gold badges105 silver badges129 bronze badges
edited May 22 at 11:08
answered May 21 at 15:10
Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh
22k22 gold badges105 silver badges129 bronze badges
answered May 21 at 15:10
Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh
22k22 gold badges105 silver badges129 bronze badges
answered May 21 at 15:10
Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh
22k22 gold badges105 silver badges129 bronze badges
22k22 gold badges105 silver badges129 bronze badges
@Will Thanks for being that guy. :) (Actually, me goes and sulks in a corner)
– Sourav Ghosh
May 22 at 11:08
2
@Will In C#, it is perfectly fine to use?.(at some point) haha
– Rafalon
May 22 at 11:13
add a comment |
@Will Thanks for being that guy. :) (Actually, me goes and sulks in a corner)
– Sourav Ghosh
May 22 at 11:08
2
@Will In C#, it is perfectly fine to use?.(at some point) haha
– Rafalon
May 22 at 11:13
@Will Thanks for being that guy. :) (Actually, me goes and sulks in a corner)
– Sourav Ghosh
May 22 at 11:08
@Will Thanks for being that guy. :) (Actually, me goes and sulks in a corner)
– Sourav Ghosh
May 22 at 11:08
2
2
@Will In C#, it is perfectly fine to use
?. (at some point) haha– Rafalon
May 22 at 11:13
@Will In C#, it is perfectly fine to use
?. (at some point) haha– Rafalon
May 22 at 11:13
add a comment |
If you are quite confident they simply made a mistake, save them the time and effort of resending. Just reply-all yourself, and say something like
Copying everyone else in on this message
answered May 22 at 2:25
ArteliusArtelius
1,2136 silver badges10 bronze badges
3
Pretty much everybody does this after a year or two. It's up to the sender to call "eyes only".
– mckenzm
May 22 at 4:44
8
It may not be appropriate in some more formal threads were clear visibility of who wrote what is important - forwarded citation may be hidden, and email coming from wrong person may be ignored. In these sensitive cases, e.g. if the sender is your manager, and attention of someone higher in the chain is needed, asking the author to re-send the email correctly is safer. In usual, everyday cases - yeah, re-sending the message yourself is the simplest option.
– Frax
May 22 at 14:23
1
Meanwhile, while you're "saving them the time and effort", the original sender has realized their mistake and already re-sent the e-mail to everyone, "helpfully" omitting you the second time around so you don't get duplicate messages. Now everyone except you has been spammed with the same message twice.
– jmbpiano
May 23 at 18:46
add a comment |
If you are quite confident they simply made a mistake, save them the time and effort of resending. Just reply-all yourself, and say something like
Copying everyone else in on this message
answered May 22 at 2:25
ArteliusArtelius
1,2136 silver badges10 bronze badges
3
Pretty much everybody does this after a year or two. It's up to the sender to call "eyes only".
– mckenzm
May 22 at 4:44
8
It may not be appropriate in some more formal threads were clear visibility of who wrote what is important - forwarded citation may be hidden, and email coming from wrong person may be ignored. In these sensitive cases, e.g. if the sender is your manager, and attention of someone higher in the chain is needed, asking the author to re-send the email correctly is safer. In usual, everyday cases - yeah, re-sending the message yourself is the simplest option.
– Frax
May 22 at 14:23
1
Meanwhile, while you're "saving them the time and effort", the original sender has realized their mistake and already re-sent the e-mail to everyone, "helpfully" omitting you the second time around so you don't get duplicate messages. Now everyone except you has been spammed with the same message twice.
– jmbpiano
May 23 at 18:46
add a comment |
If you are quite confident they simply made a mistake, save them the time and effort of resending. Just reply-all yourself, and say something like
Copying everyone else in on this message
answered May 22 at 2:25
ArteliusArtelius
1,2136 silver badges10 bronze badges
If you are quite confident they simply made a mistake, save them the time and effort of resending. Just reply-all yourself, and say something like
Copying everyone else in on this message
answered May 22 at 2:25
ArteliusArtelius
1,2136 silver badges10 bronze badges
answered May 22 at 2:25
ArteliusArtelius
1,2136 silver badges10 bronze badges
answered May 22 at 2:25
ArteliusArtelius
1,2136 silver badges10 bronze badges
answered May 22 at 2:25
ArteliusArtelius
1,2136 silver badges10 bronze badges
1,2136 silver badges10 bronze badges
3
Pretty much everybody does this after a year or two. It's up to the sender to call "eyes only".
– mckenzm
May 22 at 4:44
8
It may not be appropriate in some more formal threads were clear visibility of who wrote what is important - forwarded citation may be hidden, and email coming from wrong person may be ignored. In these sensitive cases, e.g. if the sender is your manager, and attention of someone higher in the chain is needed, asking the author to re-send the email correctly is safer. In usual, everyday cases - yeah, re-sending the message yourself is the simplest option.
– Frax
May 22 at 14:23
1
Meanwhile, while you're "saving them the time and effort", the original sender has realized their mistake and already re-sent the e-mail to everyone, "helpfully" omitting you the second time around so you don't get duplicate messages. Now everyone except you has been spammed with the same message twice.
– jmbpiano
May 23 at 18:46
add a comment |
3
Pretty much everybody does this after a year or two. It's up to the sender to call "eyes only".
– mckenzm
May 22 at 4:44
8
It may not be appropriate in some more formal threads were clear visibility of who wrote what is important - forwarded citation may be hidden, and email coming from wrong person may be ignored. In these sensitive cases, e.g. if the sender is your manager, and attention of someone higher in the chain is needed, asking the author to re-send the email correctly is safer. In usual, everyday cases - yeah, re-sending the message yourself is the simplest option.
– Frax
May 22 at 14:23
1
Meanwhile, while you're "saving them the time and effort", the original sender has realized their mistake and already re-sent the e-mail to everyone, "helpfully" omitting you the second time around so you don't get duplicate messages. Now everyone except you has been spammed with the same message twice.
– jmbpiano
May 23 at 18:46
3
3
Pretty much everybody does this after a year or two. It's up to the sender to call "eyes only".
– mckenzm
May 22 at 4:44
Pretty much everybody does this after a year or two. It's up to the sender to call "eyes only".
– mckenzm
May 22 at 4:44
8
8
It may not be appropriate in some more formal threads were clear visibility of who wrote what is important - forwarded citation may be hidden, and email coming from wrong person may be ignored. In these sensitive cases, e.g. if the sender is your manager, and attention of someone higher in the chain is needed, asking the author to re-send the email correctly is safer. In usual, everyday cases - yeah, re-sending the message yourself is the simplest option.
– Frax
May 22 at 14:23
It may not be appropriate in some more formal threads were clear visibility of who wrote what is important - forwarded citation may be hidden, and email coming from wrong person may be ignored. In these sensitive cases, e.g. if the sender is your manager, and attention of someone higher in the chain is needed, asking the author to re-send the email correctly is safer. In usual, everyday cases - yeah, re-sending the message yourself is the simplest option.
– Frax
May 22 at 14:23
1
1
Meanwhile, while you're "saving them the time and effort", the original sender has realized their mistake and already re-sent the e-mail to everyone, "helpfully" omitting you the second time around so you don't get duplicate messages. Now everyone except you has been spammed with the same message twice.
– jmbpiano
May 23 at 18:46
Meanwhile, while you're "saving them the time and effort", the original sender has realized their mistake and already re-sent the e-mail to everyone, "helpfully" omitting you the second time around so you don't get duplicate messages. Now everyone except you has been spammed with the same message twice.
– jmbpiano
May 23 at 18:46
add a comment |
You can say something polite like:
It looks you intended this email for all of us, and I'm guessing you meant to hit Reply All?
To avoid problems like this, I would like to share a handy email habit that I learned about at a previous workplace. Here it is: when someone in the team adds new people in an email thread, they would start the email body with a sentence like this:
[CC Bob Smith, Alice Jackson]
Because changes in the CC field are very easy to miss in most email interfaces, this would point out the change and indicate that the change was intentional.
Similarly, if someone removed people from the To: or CC: fields, they would start the email body with a sentence like this:
[To Alex only]
Again, that points out the change to a reader who might have missed it, and indicates that the change was intentional.
If the people in your workplace are in the habit of using a system like this, it makes it obvious when somebody accidentally hits Reply instead of Reply All, and you can confidently add back missing email thread participants without needing to ask permission first.
answered May 23 at 12:50
FlimmFlimm
1213 bronze badges
While this sounds like it could be a positive change, how would you suggest the OP introduces it to, and gets buy in from, their team?
– Player One
May 23 at 13:03
@PlayerOne Just start using it and see if the habit spreads. Nobody imposed it on me, I just picked this up. I don't want to stray too far from the original question so I don't think I should elaborate more in the answer post.
– Flimm
May 23 at 14:07
add a comment |
You can say something polite like:
It looks you intended this email for all of us, and I'm guessing you meant to hit Reply All?
To avoid problems like this, I would like to share a handy email habit that I learned about at a previous workplace. Here it is: when someone in the team adds new people in an email thread, they would start the email body with a sentence like this:
[CC Bob Smith, Alice Jackson]
Because changes in the CC field are very easy to miss in most email interfaces, this would point out the change and indicate that the change was intentional.
Similarly, if someone removed people from the To: or CC: fields, they would start the email body with a sentence like this:
[To Alex only]
Again, that points out the change to a reader who might have missed it, and indicates that the change was intentional.
If the people in your workplace are in the habit of using a system like this, it makes it obvious when somebody accidentally hits Reply instead of Reply All, and you can confidently add back missing email thread participants without needing to ask permission first.
answered May 23 at 12:50
FlimmFlimm
1213 bronze badges
While this sounds like it could be a positive change, how would you suggest the OP introduces it to, and gets buy in from, their team?
– Player One
May 23 at 13:03
@PlayerOne Just start using it and see if the habit spreads. Nobody imposed it on me, I just picked this up. I don't want to stray too far from the original question so I don't think I should elaborate more in the answer post.
– Flimm
May 23 at 14:07
add a comment |
You can say something polite like:
It looks you intended this email for all of us, and I'm guessing you meant to hit Reply All?
To avoid problems like this, I would like to share a handy email habit that I learned about at a previous workplace. Here it is: when someone in the team adds new people in an email thread, they would start the email body with a sentence like this:
[CC Bob Smith, Alice Jackson]
Because changes in the CC field are very easy to miss in most email interfaces, this would point out the change and indicate that the change was intentional.
Similarly, if someone removed people from the To: or CC: fields, they would start the email body with a sentence like this:
[To Alex only]
Again, that points out the change to a reader who might have missed it, and indicates that the change was intentional.
If the people in your workplace are in the habit of using a system like this, it makes it obvious when somebody accidentally hits Reply instead of Reply All, and you can confidently add back missing email thread participants without needing to ask permission first.
answered May 23 at 12:50
FlimmFlimm
1213 bronze badges
You can say something polite like:
It looks you intended this email for all of us, and I'm guessing you meant to hit Reply All?
To avoid problems like this, I would like to share a handy email habit that I learned about at a previous workplace. Here it is: when someone in the team adds new people in an email thread, they would start the email body with a sentence like this:
[CC Bob Smith, Alice Jackson]
Because changes in the CC field are very easy to miss in most email interfaces, this would point out the change and indicate that the change was intentional.
Similarly, if someone removed people from the To: or CC: fields, they would start the email body with a sentence like this:
[To Alex only]
Again, that points out the change to a reader who might have missed it, and indicates that the change was intentional.
If the people in your workplace are in the habit of using a system like this, it makes it obvious when somebody accidentally hits Reply instead of Reply All, and you can confidently add back missing email thread participants without needing to ask permission first.
answered May 23 at 12:50
FlimmFlimm
1213 bronze badges
answered May 23 at 12:50
FlimmFlimm
1213 bronze badges
answered May 23 at 12:50
FlimmFlimm
1213 bronze badges
answered May 23 at 12:50
FlimmFlimm
1213 bronze badges
1213 bronze badges
While this sounds like it could be a positive change, how would you suggest the OP introduces it to, and gets buy in from, their team?
– Player One
May 23 at 13:03
@PlayerOne Just start using it and see if the habit spreads. Nobody imposed it on me, I just picked this up. I don't want to stray too far from the original question so I don't think I should elaborate more in the answer post.
– Flimm
May 23 at 14:07
add a comment |
While this sounds like it could be a positive change, how would you suggest the OP introduces it to, and gets buy in from, their team?
– Player One
May 23 at 13:03
@PlayerOne Just start using it and see if the habit spreads. Nobody imposed it on me, I just picked this up. I don't want to stray too far from the original question so I don't think I should elaborate more in the answer post.
– Flimm
May 23 at 14:07
While this sounds like it could be a positive change, how would you suggest the OP introduces it to, and gets buy in from, their team?
– Player One
May 23 at 13:03
While this sounds like it could be a positive change, how would you suggest the OP introduces it to, and gets buy in from, their team?
– Player One
May 23 at 13:03
@PlayerOne Just start using it and see if the habit spreads. Nobody imposed it on me, I just picked this up. I don't want to stray too far from the original question so I don't think I should elaborate more in the answer post.
– Flimm
May 23 at 14:07
@PlayerOne Just start using it and see if the habit spreads. Nobody imposed it on me, I just picked this up. I don't want to stray too far from the original question so I don't think I should elaborate more in the answer post.
– Flimm
May 23 at 14:07
add a comment |
It seems some people didn't get the message, let's include them now.
That way you aren't blaming anyone. It's also useful when by mistake a certain individual gets taken out from the conversation and then you can say
Just including XY in the conversation, it seems he didn't get some of the messages.
Again, not blaming anyone, even though a perceptive person will be able to see who made the mistake in the conversation chain.
answered May 22 at 14:24
stackzebrastackzebra
1091 bronze badge
add a comment |
It seems some people didn't get the message, let's include them now.
That way you aren't blaming anyone. It's also useful when by mistake a certain individual gets taken out from the conversation and then you can say
Just including XY in the conversation, it seems he didn't get some of the messages.
Again, not blaming anyone, even though a perceptive person will be able to see who made the mistake in the conversation chain.
answered May 22 at 14:24
stackzebrastackzebra
1091 bronze badge
add a comment |
It seems some people didn't get the message, let's include them now.
That way you aren't blaming anyone. It's also useful when by mistake a certain individual gets taken out from the conversation and then you can say
Just including XY in the conversation, it seems he didn't get some of the messages.
Again, not blaming anyone, even though a perceptive person will be able to see who made the mistake in the conversation chain.
answered May 22 at 14:24
stackzebrastackzebra
1091 bronze badge
It seems some people didn't get the message, let's include them now.
That way you aren't blaming anyone. It's also useful when by mistake a certain individual gets taken out from the conversation and then you can say
Just including XY in the conversation, it seems he didn't get some of the messages.
Again, not blaming anyone, even though a perceptive person will be able to see who made the mistake in the conversation chain.
answered May 22 at 14:24
stackzebrastackzebra
1091 bronze badge
answered May 22 at 14:24
stackzebrastackzebra
1091 bronze badge
answered May 22 at 14:24
stackzebrastackzebra
1091 bronze badge
answered May 22 at 14:24
stackzebrastackzebra
1091 bronze badge
1091 bronze badge
add a comment |
add a comment |
What I personally do, is if I think that the original respondents would benefit from the email, I either forward the email to them or reply to the email saying something like thanks and add the other intended recipients.
No need to do anything that can be taken negatively and there is a possibility that the respondent will understand that the others would have benefited from his email.
answered May 22 at 22:52
Al rlAl rl
212 bronze badges
add a comment |
What I personally do, is if I think that the original respondents would benefit from the email, I either forward the email to them or reply to the email saying something like thanks and add the other intended recipients.
No need to do anything that can be taken negatively and there is a possibility that the respondent will understand that the others would have benefited from his email.
answered May 22 at 22:52
Al rlAl rl
212 bronze badges
add a comment |
What I personally do, is if I think that the original respondents would benefit from the email, I either forward the email to them or reply to the email saying something like thanks and add the other intended recipients.
No need to do anything that can be taken negatively and there is a possibility that the respondent will understand that the others would have benefited from his email.
answered May 22 at 22:52
Al rlAl rl
212 bronze badges
What I personally do, is if I think that the original respondents would benefit from the email, I either forward the email to them or reply to the email saying something like thanks and add the other intended recipients.
No need to do anything that can be taken negatively and there is a possibility that the respondent will understand that the others would have benefited from his email.
answered May 22 at 22:52
Al rlAl rl
212 bronze badges
answered May 22 at 22:52
Al rlAl rl
212 bronze badges
answered May 22 at 22:52
Al rlAl rl
212 bronze badges
answered May 22 at 22:52
Al rlAl rl
212 bronze badges
212 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136976%2fhow-to-politely-tell-someone-they-did-not-hit-reply-to-all-in-an-email%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
And you are confident they did not Reply with all moved to BCC?
– TafT
May 24 at 7:36