What word means “almost a homophone”?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
Homophones are two words with the same sound, but different meaning, like red and read (the past tense of to read ).
Is there a linguistic term which refers to two or more words which have almost the same, but not quite the same sound? I am particularly referring to the situation which happens in Chinese, in which two words have a similar sound, and would even have the same spelling in IPA, but different tone, for example 到 (dao) which has a falling tone and 岛 (dao) which falls, then rises, so they are nearly alike in pronunciation, not not identical.
Is there a broader linguistic term which both includes homophones and these “almost-homophones”?
single-word-requests
edited Aug 31 '12 at 14:16
tchrist♦
111k30 gold badges302 silver badges483 bronze badges
asked Aug 31 '12 at 13:57
VillageVillage
90014 gold badges27 silver badges61 bronze badges
add a comment |
Homophones are two words with the same sound, but different meaning, like red and read (the past tense of to read ).
Is there a linguistic term which refers to two or more words which have almost the same, but not quite the same sound? I am particularly referring to the situation which happens in Chinese, in which two words have a similar sound, and would even have the same spelling in IPA, but different tone, for example 到 (dao) which has a falling tone and 岛 (dao) which falls, then rises, so they are nearly alike in pronunciation, not not identical.
Is there a broader linguistic term which both includes homophones and these “almost-homophones”?
single-word-requests
edited Aug 31 '12 at 14:16
tchrist♦
111k30 gold badges302 silver badges483 bronze badges
asked Aug 31 '12 at 13:57
VillageVillage
90014 gold badges27 silver badges61 bronze badges
Can you give an example or two of pairs of words you consider almost homonyms? Do you mean a near rhyme?
– JLG
Aug 31 '12 at 14:04
An English-language example of the phenomenon you describe in Chinese might be a word that differs only in stress (and thus, pitch), such as record as a noun versus record as a verb.
– tchrist♦
Aug 31 '12 at 14:32
One example of tones distinguishing words in (American) English is "valet" vs. "valley." Depending on which syllable you emphasize, you get one word or the other (almost).
– Matt Chambers
Oct 15 '14 at 4:28
Related: What word means “almost a homophobe”?
– Volker Siegel
Jun 12 '15 at 9:35
add a comment |
Homophones are two words with the same sound, but different meaning, like red and read (the past tense of to read ).
Is there a linguistic term which refers to two or more words which have almost the same, but not quite the same sound? I am particularly referring to the situation which happens in Chinese, in which two words have a similar sound, and would even have the same spelling in IPA, but different tone, for example 到 (dao) which has a falling tone and 岛 (dao) which falls, then rises, so they are nearly alike in pronunciation, not not identical.
Is there a broader linguistic term which both includes homophones and these “almost-homophones”?
single-word-requests
edited Aug 31 '12 at 14:16
tchrist♦
111k30 gold badges302 silver badges483 bronze badges
asked Aug 31 '12 at 13:57
VillageVillage
90014 gold badges27 silver badges61 bronze badges
Homophones are two words with the same sound, but different meaning, like red and read (the past tense of to read ).
Is there a linguistic term which refers to two or more words which have almost the same, but not quite the same sound? I am particularly referring to the situation which happens in Chinese, in which two words have a similar sound, and would even have the same spelling in IPA, but different tone, for example 到 (dao) which has a falling tone and 岛 (dao) which falls, then rises, so they are nearly alike in pronunciation, not not identical.
Is there a broader linguistic term which both includes homophones and these “almost-homophones”?
single-word-requests
single-word-requests
edited Aug 31 '12 at 14:16
tchrist♦
111k30 gold badges302 silver badges483 bronze badges
asked Aug 31 '12 at 13:57
VillageVillage
90014 gold badges27 silver badges61 bronze badges
edited Aug 31 '12 at 14:16
tchrist♦
111k30 gold badges302 silver badges483 bronze badges
asked Aug 31 '12 at 13:57
VillageVillage
90014 gold badges27 silver badges61 bronze badges
edited Aug 31 '12 at 14:16
tchrist♦
111k30 gold badges302 silver badges483 bronze badges
edited Aug 31 '12 at 14:16
tchrist♦
111k30 gold badges302 silver badges483 bronze badges
edited Aug 31 '12 at 14:16
tchrist♦
111k30 gold badges302 silver badges483 bronze badges
111k30 gold badges302 silver badges483 bronze badges
asked Aug 31 '12 at 13:57
VillageVillage
90014 gold badges27 silver badges61 bronze badges
asked Aug 31 '12 at 13:57
VillageVillage
90014 gold badges27 silver badges61 bronze badges
asked Aug 31 '12 at 13:57
VillageVillage
90014 gold badges27 silver badges61 bronze badges
90014 gold badges27 silver badges61 bronze badges
Can you give an example or two of pairs of words you consider almost homonyms? Do you mean a near rhyme?
– JLG
Aug 31 '12 at 14:04
An English-language example of the phenomenon you describe in Chinese might be a word that differs only in stress (and thus, pitch), such as record as a noun versus record as a verb.
– tchrist♦
Aug 31 '12 at 14:32
One example of tones distinguishing words in (American) English is "valet" vs. "valley." Depending on which syllable you emphasize, you get one word or the other (almost).
– Matt Chambers
Oct 15 '14 at 4:28
Related: What word means “almost a homophobe”?
– Volker Siegel
Jun 12 '15 at 9:35
add a comment |
Can you give an example or two of pairs of words you consider almost homonyms? Do you mean a near rhyme?
– JLG
Aug 31 '12 at 14:04
An English-language example of the phenomenon you describe in Chinese might be a word that differs only in stress (and thus, pitch), such as record as a noun versus record as a verb.
– tchrist♦
Aug 31 '12 at 14:32
One example of tones distinguishing words in (American) English is "valet" vs. "valley." Depending on which syllable you emphasize, you get one word or the other (almost).
– Matt Chambers
Oct 15 '14 at 4:28
Related: What word means “almost a homophobe”?
– Volker Siegel
Jun 12 '15 at 9:35
Can you give an example or two of pairs of words you consider almost homonyms? Do you mean a near rhyme?
– JLG
Aug 31 '12 at 14:04
Can you give an example or two of pairs of words you consider almost homonyms? Do you mean a near rhyme?
– JLG
Aug 31 '12 at 14:04
An English-language example of the phenomenon you describe in Chinese might be a word that differs only in stress (and thus, pitch), such as record as a noun versus record as a verb.
– tchrist♦
Aug 31 '12 at 14:32
An English-language example of the phenomenon you describe in Chinese might be a word that differs only in stress (and thus, pitch), such as record as a noun versus record as a verb.
– tchrist♦
Aug 31 '12 at 14:32
One example of tones distinguishing words in (American) English is "valet" vs. "valley." Depending on which syllable you emphasize, you get one word or the other (almost).
– Matt Chambers
Oct 15 '14 at 4:28
One example of tones distinguishing words in (American) English is "valet" vs. "valley." Depending on which syllable you emphasize, you get one word or the other (almost).
– Matt Chambers
Oct 15 '14 at 4:28
Related: What word means “almost a homophobe”?
– Volker Siegel
Jun 12 '15 at 9:35
Related: What word means “almost a homophobe”?
– Volker Siegel
Jun 12 '15 at 9:35
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
There is a linguistic term which refers to two or more words which have almost the same, but not quite the same sound. It has nothing to do with the spelling, however.
It's a term for the two words, as a pair. Beat [bit] and bit [bɪt] , for example, which differ only in their vowels - tense high front [i] and lax high front [ɪ] -- are said to be a Minimal Pair for the two sounds that differ.
Discovery of a minimal pair is evidence that the two sounds that differ are in contrast, not in Complementary Distribution. That means that native speakers have to routinely distinguish them because they are the only way they could tell the difference between the two words.
So they are therefore separate Phonemes. I.e, you can write them not just phonetically as [i] and [ɪ], but phonemically, as /i/ and /ɪ/. Knowing this is important to linguists (and occasionally interesting to others).
That's how we know there are around fourteen vowels in English, instead of the five Middle English "vowel letters" we're stuck with now -- in Middle English there were far fewer, but all of them came in two lengths, which were wiped out by the Great Vowel Shift. We have minimal pairs for all of them.
The simplest set of minimal pairs for English vowels that I know of in my American dialect is
beat /i/, bit /ɪ/, bait /e/, bet /ɛ/, bat /æ/, bought /ɔ/, but /ə/
bot /a/, boat /o/, put /ʊ/, boot /u/, bite /ay/, bout /aw/
There is no English word *[bʊt], but Luke and look are a minimal pair for them. /oy/ doesn't occur in this frame, but there are minimal pairs for all three diphthongs as well -- buy, boy, bough, for instance.
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:46
John LawlerJohn Lawler
86.7k6 gold badges122 silver badges348 bronze badges
1
You will find [bʊt] in north England, 'north' meaning roughly north of Birmingham. It is a land where the FOOT vowel rules, and the STRUT vowel fears to tread, and /bʌt/ becomes /bʊt/.
– Roaring Fish
Aug 31 '12 at 15:10
4
British Englishes, especially Northern ones, are another kettle of vowels entirely. There's far more phonetic variation in any hundred mile square of Great Britain than there is in all of North America. They've simply been speaking English so much longer there.
– John Lawler
Aug 31 '12 at 16:48
@John Lawler: By rights that should give us Brits a better "ear" for dialects, since we should hear more of them, more often.
– FumbleFingers
Dec 1 '12 at 2:52
Well, you live there, so you can tell. I don't, so I can't.
– John Lawler
Dec 1 '12 at 3:07
add a comment |
Yes, "quasi-homophones". "Quasi" means "seeming or seemingly; nearly". As a prefix it's generally hyphenated. It's pronunced /kwah-zee/.
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:04
Elberich SchneiderElberich Schneider
1,11019 gold badges54 silver badges99 bronze badges
1
Except when it's pronounced "kway-zye", as in the first pronunciation given by Merriam-Webster merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quasi
– nohat♦
Aug 31 '12 at 15:13
2
@nohat: I think that’s a typo for [kwazaɪ], because [kwɛɪzaɪ] sounds hilarious. Unless you were joking, in which case I’m just being obtuse. :P
– Jon Purdy
Aug 31 '12 at 18:17
@Jon did you listen to the audio? KWAY-zye is the first pronunciation given by not just Merriam-Webster, but all the online dictionaries I checked: dictionary.com, which has Random House and Collins, and thefreedictionary.com, which has American Heritage. Same with Cambridge and Oxford
– nohat♦
Aug 31 '12 at 20:15
2
@nohat: Next you’ll tell me that lingerie is pronounced langeray. :(
– Jon Purdy
Sep 1 '12 at 0:45
I've come to this a little late, Elberich, but can you give an authoritative reference (rather than what appears a nonce usage or a translation from French) endorsing this term?
– Edwin Ashworth
May 24 at 16:22
add a comment |
I like "quasi-homophones," but maybe we should stick with "near homophones." Here's a list I made over a period of months. I didn't spend hours on this. Whenever I happen to think of a pair of near homophones, I add it to the list. (Some are nearer than others.)
ALMOST HOMOPHONES
It’s windy today.
No, it’s Thursday.
So am I; let’s have a beer.
abdominal = abominable.
anonymous = unanimous.
appellation = Appalachian.
culpable = capable.
collusion = collision.
condescension = condensation.
cooperate = corroborate.
curdle = cuddle.
discussed = disgust.
festival = vegetable.
elicit = illicit.
interface = interfaith.
irreverent = irrelevant.
melody = malady.
militias = malicious.
precedent = president.
supplies = surprise.
tempter = temperature.
unaware = underwear.
underserved = undeserved.
answered May 24 at 16:08
WaynneWaynne
211 bronze badge
1
Hello, Wayne and welcome to ELU. I'm afraid that this answer, which appears to be very subjective (and gives a list of word-pairs which are nothing like minimal pairs), is not suited to the site.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 24 at 16:26
Thank you, Edwin. Sorry you don't like my answer. I think if you listen to "festival" and "vegetable" with an open mind you will know that those two words truly are almost homophones. Peace..
– Waynne
May 24 at 17:27
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80198%2fwhat-word-means-almost-a-homophone%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is a linguistic term which refers to two or more words which have almost the same, but not quite the same sound. It has nothing to do with the spelling, however.
It's a term for the two words, as a pair. Beat [bit] and bit [bɪt] , for example, which differ only in their vowels - tense high front [i] and lax high front [ɪ] -- are said to be a Minimal Pair for the two sounds that differ.
Discovery of a minimal pair is evidence that the two sounds that differ are in contrast, not in Complementary Distribution. That means that native speakers have to routinely distinguish them because they are the only way they could tell the difference between the two words.
So they are therefore separate Phonemes. I.e, you can write them not just phonetically as [i] and [ɪ], but phonemically, as /i/ and /ɪ/. Knowing this is important to linguists (and occasionally interesting to others).
That's how we know there are around fourteen vowels in English, instead of the five Middle English "vowel letters" we're stuck with now -- in Middle English there were far fewer, but all of them came in two lengths, which were wiped out by the Great Vowel Shift. We have minimal pairs for all of them.
The simplest set of minimal pairs for English vowels that I know of in my American dialect is
beat /i/, bit /ɪ/, bait /e/, bet /ɛ/, bat /æ/, bought /ɔ/, but /ə/
bot /a/, boat /o/, put /ʊ/, boot /u/, bite /ay/, bout /aw/
There is no English word *[bʊt], but Luke and look are a minimal pair for them. /oy/ doesn't occur in this frame, but there are minimal pairs for all three diphthongs as well -- buy, boy, bough, for instance.
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:46
John LawlerJohn Lawler
86.7k6 gold badges122 silver badges348 bronze badges
1
You will find [bʊt] in north England, 'north' meaning roughly north of Birmingham. It is a land where the FOOT vowel rules, and the STRUT vowel fears to tread, and /bʌt/ becomes /bʊt/.
– Roaring Fish
Aug 31 '12 at 15:10
4
British Englishes, especially Northern ones, are another kettle of vowels entirely. There's far more phonetic variation in any hundred mile square of Great Britain than there is in all of North America. They've simply been speaking English so much longer there.
– John Lawler
Aug 31 '12 at 16:48
@John Lawler: By rights that should give us Brits a better "ear" for dialects, since we should hear more of them, more often.
– FumbleFingers
Dec 1 '12 at 2:52
Well, you live there, so you can tell. I don't, so I can't.
– John Lawler
Dec 1 '12 at 3:07
add a comment |
There is a linguistic term which refers to two or more words which have almost the same, but not quite the same sound. It has nothing to do with the spelling, however.
It's a term for the two words, as a pair. Beat [bit] and bit [bɪt] , for example, which differ only in their vowels - tense high front [i] and lax high front [ɪ] -- are said to be a Minimal Pair for the two sounds that differ.
Discovery of a minimal pair is evidence that the two sounds that differ are in contrast, not in Complementary Distribution. That means that native speakers have to routinely distinguish them because they are the only way they could tell the difference between the two words.
So they are therefore separate Phonemes. I.e, you can write them not just phonetically as [i] and [ɪ], but phonemically, as /i/ and /ɪ/. Knowing this is important to linguists (and occasionally interesting to others).
That's how we know there are around fourteen vowels in English, instead of the five Middle English "vowel letters" we're stuck with now -- in Middle English there were far fewer, but all of them came in two lengths, which were wiped out by the Great Vowel Shift. We have minimal pairs for all of them.
The simplest set of minimal pairs for English vowels that I know of in my American dialect is
beat /i/, bit /ɪ/, bait /e/, bet /ɛ/, bat /æ/, bought /ɔ/, but /ə/
bot /a/, boat /o/, put /ʊ/, boot /u/, bite /ay/, bout /aw/
There is no English word *[bʊt], but Luke and look are a minimal pair for them. /oy/ doesn't occur in this frame, but there are minimal pairs for all three diphthongs as well -- buy, boy, bough, for instance.
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:46
John LawlerJohn Lawler
86.7k6 gold badges122 silver badges348 bronze badges
1
You will find [bʊt] in north England, 'north' meaning roughly north of Birmingham. It is a land where the FOOT vowel rules, and the STRUT vowel fears to tread, and /bʌt/ becomes /bʊt/.
– Roaring Fish
Aug 31 '12 at 15:10
4
British Englishes, especially Northern ones, are another kettle of vowels entirely. There's far more phonetic variation in any hundred mile square of Great Britain than there is in all of North America. They've simply been speaking English so much longer there.
– John Lawler
Aug 31 '12 at 16:48
@John Lawler: By rights that should give us Brits a better "ear" for dialects, since we should hear more of them, more often.
– FumbleFingers
Dec 1 '12 at 2:52
Well, you live there, so you can tell. I don't, so I can't.
– John Lawler
Dec 1 '12 at 3:07
add a comment |
There is a linguistic term which refers to two or more words which have almost the same, but not quite the same sound. It has nothing to do with the spelling, however.
It's a term for the two words, as a pair. Beat [bit] and bit [bɪt] , for example, which differ only in their vowels - tense high front [i] and lax high front [ɪ] -- are said to be a Minimal Pair for the two sounds that differ.
Discovery of a minimal pair is evidence that the two sounds that differ are in contrast, not in Complementary Distribution. That means that native speakers have to routinely distinguish them because they are the only way they could tell the difference between the two words.
So they are therefore separate Phonemes. I.e, you can write them not just phonetically as [i] and [ɪ], but phonemically, as /i/ and /ɪ/. Knowing this is important to linguists (and occasionally interesting to others).
That's how we know there are around fourteen vowels in English, instead of the five Middle English "vowel letters" we're stuck with now -- in Middle English there were far fewer, but all of them came in two lengths, which were wiped out by the Great Vowel Shift. We have minimal pairs for all of them.
The simplest set of minimal pairs for English vowels that I know of in my American dialect is
beat /i/, bit /ɪ/, bait /e/, bet /ɛ/, bat /æ/, bought /ɔ/, but /ə/
bot /a/, boat /o/, put /ʊ/, boot /u/, bite /ay/, bout /aw/
There is no English word *[bʊt], but Luke and look are a minimal pair for them. /oy/ doesn't occur in this frame, but there are minimal pairs for all three diphthongs as well -- buy, boy, bough, for instance.
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:46
John LawlerJohn Lawler
86.7k6 gold badges122 silver badges348 bronze badges
There is a linguistic term which refers to two or more words which have almost the same, but not quite the same sound. It has nothing to do with the spelling, however.
It's a term for the two words, as a pair. Beat [bit] and bit [bɪt] , for example, which differ only in their vowels - tense high front [i] and lax high front [ɪ] -- are said to be a Minimal Pair for the two sounds that differ.
Discovery of a minimal pair is evidence that the two sounds that differ are in contrast, not in Complementary Distribution. That means that native speakers have to routinely distinguish them because they are the only way they could tell the difference between the two words.
So they are therefore separate Phonemes. I.e, you can write them not just phonetically as [i] and [ɪ], but phonemically, as /i/ and /ɪ/. Knowing this is important to linguists (and occasionally interesting to others).
That's how we know there are around fourteen vowels in English, instead of the five Middle English "vowel letters" we're stuck with now -- in Middle English there were far fewer, but all of them came in two lengths, which were wiped out by the Great Vowel Shift. We have minimal pairs for all of them.
The simplest set of minimal pairs for English vowels that I know of in my American dialect is
beat /i/, bit /ɪ/, bait /e/, bet /ɛ/, bat /æ/, bought /ɔ/, but /ə/
bot /a/, boat /o/, put /ʊ/, boot /u/, bite /ay/, bout /aw/
There is no English word *[bʊt], but Luke and look are a minimal pair for them. /oy/ doesn't occur in this frame, but there are minimal pairs for all three diphthongs as well -- buy, boy, bough, for instance.
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:46
John LawlerJohn Lawler
86.7k6 gold badges122 silver badges348 bronze badges
edited Dec 1 '12 at 0:00
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:46
John LawlerJohn Lawler
86.7k6 gold badges122 silver badges348 bronze badges
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:46
John LawlerJohn Lawler
86.7k6 gold badges122 silver badges348 bronze badges
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:46
John LawlerJohn Lawler
86.7k6 gold badges122 silver badges348 bronze badges
86.7k6 gold badges122 silver badges348 bronze badges
1
You will find [bʊt] in north England, 'north' meaning roughly north of Birmingham. It is a land where the FOOT vowel rules, and the STRUT vowel fears to tread, and /bʌt/ becomes /bʊt/.
– Roaring Fish
Aug 31 '12 at 15:10
4
British Englishes, especially Northern ones, are another kettle of vowels entirely. There's far more phonetic variation in any hundred mile square of Great Britain than there is in all of North America. They've simply been speaking English so much longer there.
– John Lawler
Aug 31 '12 at 16:48
@John Lawler: By rights that should give us Brits a better "ear" for dialects, since we should hear more of them, more often.
– FumbleFingers
Dec 1 '12 at 2:52
Well, you live there, so you can tell. I don't, so I can't.
– John Lawler
Dec 1 '12 at 3:07
add a comment |
1
You will find [bʊt] in north England, 'north' meaning roughly north of Birmingham. It is a land where the FOOT vowel rules, and the STRUT vowel fears to tread, and /bʌt/ becomes /bʊt/.
– Roaring Fish
Aug 31 '12 at 15:10
4
British Englishes, especially Northern ones, are another kettle of vowels entirely. There's far more phonetic variation in any hundred mile square of Great Britain than there is in all of North America. They've simply been speaking English so much longer there.
– John Lawler
Aug 31 '12 at 16:48
@John Lawler: By rights that should give us Brits a better "ear" for dialects, since we should hear more of them, more often.
– FumbleFingers
Dec 1 '12 at 2:52
Well, you live there, so you can tell. I don't, so I can't.
– John Lawler
Dec 1 '12 at 3:07
1
1
You will find [bʊt] in north England, 'north' meaning roughly north of Birmingham. It is a land where the FOOT vowel rules, and the STRUT vowel fears to tread, and /bʌt/ becomes /bʊt/.
– Roaring Fish
Aug 31 '12 at 15:10
You will find [bʊt] in north England, 'north' meaning roughly north of Birmingham. It is a land where the FOOT vowel rules, and the STRUT vowel fears to tread, and /bʌt/ becomes /bʊt/.
– Roaring Fish
Aug 31 '12 at 15:10
4
4
British Englishes, especially Northern ones, are another kettle of vowels entirely. There's far more phonetic variation in any hundred mile square of Great Britain than there is in all of North America. They've simply been speaking English so much longer there.
– John Lawler
Aug 31 '12 at 16:48
British Englishes, especially Northern ones, are another kettle of vowels entirely. There's far more phonetic variation in any hundred mile square of Great Britain than there is in all of North America. They've simply been speaking English so much longer there.
– John Lawler
Aug 31 '12 at 16:48
@John Lawler: By rights that should give us Brits a better "ear" for dialects, since we should hear more of them, more often.
– FumbleFingers
Dec 1 '12 at 2:52
@John Lawler: By rights that should give us Brits a better "ear" for dialects, since we should hear more of them, more often.
– FumbleFingers
Dec 1 '12 at 2:52
Well, you live there, so you can tell. I don't, so I can't.
– John Lawler
Dec 1 '12 at 3:07
Well, you live there, so you can tell. I don't, so I can't.
– John Lawler
Dec 1 '12 at 3:07
add a comment |
Yes, "quasi-homophones". "Quasi" means "seeming or seemingly; nearly". As a prefix it's generally hyphenated. It's pronunced /kwah-zee/.
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:04
Elberich SchneiderElberich Schneider
1,11019 gold badges54 silver badges99 bronze badges
1
Except when it's pronounced "kway-zye", as in the first pronunciation given by Merriam-Webster merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quasi
– nohat♦
Aug 31 '12 at 15:13
2
@nohat: I think that’s a typo for [kwazaɪ], because [kwɛɪzaɪ] sounds hilarious. Unless you were joking, in which case I’m just being obtuse. :P
– Jon Purdy
Aug 31 '12 at 18:17
@Jon did you listen to the audio? KWAY-zye is the first pronunciation given by not just Merriam-Webster, but all the online dictionaries I checked: dictionary.com, which has Random House and Collins, and thefreedictionary.com, which has American Heritage. Same with Cambridge and Oxford
– nohat♦
Aug 31 '12 at 20:15
2
@nohat: Next you’ll tell me that lingerie is pronounced langeray. :(
– Jon Purdy
Sep 1 '12 at 0:45
I've come to this a little late, Elberich, but can you give an authoritative reference (rather than what appears a nonce usage or a translation from French) endorsing this term?
– Edwin Ashworth
May 24 at 16:22
add a comment |
Yes, "quasi-homophones". "Quasi" means "seeming or seemingly; nearly". As a prefix it's generally hyphenated. It's pronunced /kwah-zee/.
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:04
Elberich SchneiderElberich Schneider
1,11019 gold badges54 silver badges99 bronze badges
1
Except when it's pronounced "kway-zye", as in the first pronunciation given by Merriam-Webster merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quasi
– nohat♦
Aug 31 '12 at 15:13
2
@nohat: I think that’s a typo for [kwazaɪ], because [kwɛɪzaɪ] sounds hilarious. Unless you were joking, in which case I’m just being obtuse. :P
– Jon Purdy
Aug 31 '12 at 18:17
@Jon did you listen to the audio? KWAY-zye is the first pronunciation given by not just Merriam-Webster, but all the online dictionaries I checked: dictionary.com, which has Random House and Collins, and thefreedictionary.com, which has American Heritage. Same with Cambridge and Oxford
– nohat♦
Aug 31 '12 at 20:15
2
@nohat: Next you’ll tell me that lingerie is pronounced langeray. :(
– Jon Purdy
Sep 1 '12 at 0:45
I've come to this a little late, Elberich, but can you give an authoritative reference (rather than what appears a nonce usage or a translation from French) endorsing this term?
– Edwin Ashworth
May 24 at 16:22
add a comment |
Yes, "quasi-homophones". "Quasi" means "seeming or seemingly; nearly". As a prefix it's generally hyphenated. It's pronunced /kwah-zee/.
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:04
Elberich SchneiderElberich Schneider
1,11019 gold badges54 silver badges99 bronze badges
Yes, "quasi-homophones". "Quasi" means "seeming or seemingly; nearly". As a prefix it's generally hyphenated. It's pronunced /kwah-zee/.
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:04
Elberich SchneiderElberich Schneider
1,11019 gold badges54 silver badges99 bronze badges
edited Aug 31 '12 at 14:20
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:04
Elberich SchneiderElberich Schneider
1,11019 gold badges54 silver badges99 bronze badges
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:04
Elberich SchneiderElberich Schneider
1,11019 gold badges54 silver badges99 bronze badges
answered Aug 31 '12 at 14:04
Elberich SchneiderElberich Schneider
1,11019 gold badges54 silver badges99 bronze badges
1,11019 gold badges54 silver badges99 bronze badges
1
Except when it's pronounced "kway-zye", as in the first pronunciation given by Merriam-Webster merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quasi
– nohat♦
Aug 31 '12 at 15:13
2
@nohat: I think that’s a typo for [kwazaɪ], because [kwɛɪzaɪ] sounds hilarious. Unless you were joking, in which case I’m just being obtuse. :P
– Jon Purdy
Aug 31 '12 at 18:17
@Jon did you listen to the audio? KWAY-zye is the first pronunciation given by not just Merriam-Webster, but all the online dictionaries I checked: dictionary.com, which has Random House and Collins, and thefreedictionary.com, which has American Heritage. Same with Cambridge and Oxford
– nohat♦
Aug 31 '12 at 20:15
2
@nohat: Next you’ll tell me that lingerie is pronounced langeray. :(
– Jon Purdy
Sep 1 '12 at 0:45
I've come to this a little late, Elberich, but can you give an authoritative reference (rather than what appears a nonce usage or a translation from French) endorsing this term?
– Edwin Ashworth
May 24 at 16:22
add a comment |
1
Except when it's pronounced "kway-zye", as in the first pronunciation given by Merriam-Webster merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quasi
– nohat♦
Aug 31 '12 at 15:13
2
@nohat: I think that’s a typo for [kwazaɪ], because [kwɛɪzaɪ] sounds hilarious. Unless you were joking, in which case I’m just being obtuse. :P
– Jon Purdy
Aug 31 '12 at 18:17
@Jon did you listen to the audio? KWAY-zye is the first pronunciation given by not just Merriam-Webster, but all the online dictionaries I checked: dictionary.com, which has Random House and Collins, and thefreedictionary.com, which has American Heritage. Same with Cambridge and Oxford
– nohat♦
Aug 31 '12 at 20:15
2
@nohat: Next you’ll tell me that lingerie is pronounced langeray. :(
– Jon Purdy
Sep 1 '12 at 0:45
I've come to this a little late, Elberich, but can you give an authoritative reference (rather than what appears a nonce usage or a translation from French) endorsing this term?
– Edwin Ashworth
May 24 at 16:22
1
1
Except when it's pronounced "kway-zye", as in the first pronunciation given by Merriam-Webster merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quasi
– nohat♦
Aug 31 '12 at 15:13
Except when it's pronounced "kway-zye", as in the first pronunciation given by Merriam-Webster merriam-webster.com/dictionary/quasi
– nohat♦
Aug 31 '12 at 15:13
2
2
@nohat: I think that’s a typo for [kwazaɪ], because [kwɛɪzaɪ] sounds hilarious. Unless you were joking, in which case I’m just being obtuse. :P
– Jon Purdy
Aug 31 '12 at 18:17
@nohat: I think that’s a typo for [kwazaɪ], because [kwɛɪzaɪ] sounds hilarious. Unless you were joking, in which case I’m just being obtuse. :P
– Jon Purdy
Aug 31 '12 at 18:17
@Jon did you listen to the audio? KWAY-zye is the first pronunciation given by not just Merriam-Webster, but all the online dictionaries I checked: dictionary.com, which has Random House and Collins, and thefreedictionary.com, which has American Heritage. Same with Cambridge and Oxford
– nohat♦
Aug 31 '12 at 20:15
@Jon did you listen to the audio? KWAY-zye is the first pronunciation given by not just Merriam-Webster, but all the online dictionaries I checked: dictionary.com, which has Random House and Collins, and thefreedictionary.com, which has American Heritage. Same with Cambridge and Oxford
– nohat♦
Aug 31 '12 at 20:15
2
2
@nohat: Next you’ll tell me that lingerie is pronounced langeray. :(
– Jon Purdy
Sep 1 '12 at 0:45
@nohat: Next you’ll tell me that lingerie is pronounced langeray. :(
– Jon Purdy
Sep 1 '12 at 0:45
I've come to this a little late, Elberich, but can you give an authoritative reference (rather than what appears a nonce usage or a translation from French) endorsing this term?
– Edwin Ashworth
May 24 at 16:22
I've come to this a little late, Elberich, but can you give an authoritative reference (rather than what appears a nonce usage or a translation from French) endorsing this term?
– Edwin Ashworth
May 24 at 16:22
add a comment |
I like "quasi-homophones," but maybe we should stick with "near homophones." Here's a list I made over a period of months. I didn't spend hours on this. Whenever I happen to think of a pair of near homophones, I add it to the list. (Some are nearer than others.)
ALMOST HOMOPHONES
It’s windy today.
No, it’s Thursday.
So am I; let’s have a beer.
abdominal = abominable.
anonymous = unanimous.
appellation = Appalachian.
culpable = capable.
collusion = collision.
condescension = condensation.
cooperate = corroborate.
curdle = cuddle.
discussed = disgust.
festival = vegetable.
elicit = illicit.
interface = interfaith.
irreverent = irrelevant.
melody = malady.
militias = malicious.
precedent = president.
supplies = surprise.
tempter = temperature.
unaware = underwear.
underserved = undeserved.
answered May 24 at 16:08
WaynneWaynne
211 bronze badge
1
Hello, Wayne and welcome to ELU. I'm afraid that this answer, which appears to be very subjective (and gives a list of word-pairs which are nothing like minimal pairs), is not suited to the site.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 24 at 16:26
Thank you, Edwin. Sorry you don't like my answer. I think if you listen to "festival" and "vegetable" with an open mind you will know that those two words truly are almost homophones. Peace..
– Waynne
May 24 at 17:27
add a comment |
I like "quasi-homophones," but maybe we should stick with "near homophones." Here's a list I made over a period of months. I didn't spend hours on this. Whenever I happen to think of a pair of near homophones, I add it to the list. (Some are nearer than others.)
ALMOST HOMOPHONES
It’s windy today.
No, it’s Thursday.
So am I; let’s have a beer.
abdominal = abominable.
anonymous = unanimous.
appellation = Appalachian.
culpable = capable.
collusion = collision.
condescension = condensation.
cooperate = corroborate.
curdle = cuddle.
discussed = disgust.
festival = vegetable.
elicit = illicit.
interface = interfaith.
irreverent = irrelevant.
melody = malady.
militias = malicious.
precedent = president.
supplies = surprise.
tempter = temperature.
unaware = underwear.
underserved = undeserved.
answered May 24 at 16:08
WaynneWaynne
211 bronze badge
1
Hello, Wayne and welcome to ELU. I'm afraid that this answer, which appears to be very subjective (and gives a list of word-pairs which are nothing like minimal pairs), is not suited to the site.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 24 at 16:26
Thank you, Edwin. Sorry you don't like my answer. I think if you listen to "festival" and "vegetable" with an open mind you will know that those two words truly are almost homophones. Peace..
– Waynne
May 24 at 17:27
add a comment |
I like "quasi-homophones," but maybe we should stick with "near homophones." Here's a list I made over a period of months. I didn't spend hours on this. Whenever I happen to think of a pair of near homophones, I add it to the list. (Some are nearer than others.)
ALMOST HOMOPHONES
It’s windy today.
No, it’s Thursday.
So am I; let’s have a beer.
abdominal = abominable.
anonymous = unanimous.
appellation = Appalachian.
culpable = capable.
collusion = collision.
condescension = condensation.
cooperate = corroborate.
curdle = cuddle.
discussed = disgust.
festival = vegetable.
elicit = illicit.
interface = interfaith.
irreverent = irrelevant.
melody = malady.
militias = malicious.
precedent = president.
supplies = surprise.
tempter = temperature.
unaware = underwear.
underserved = undeserved.
answered May 24 at 16:08
WaynneWaynne
211 bronze badge
I like "quasi-homophones," but maybe we should stick with "near homophones." Here's a list I made over a period of months. I didn't spend hours on this. Whenever I happen to think of a pair of near homophones, I add it to the list. (Some are nearer than others.)
ALMOST HOMOPHONES
It’s windy today.
No, it’s Thursday.
So am I; let’s have a beer.
abdominal = abominable.
anonymous = unanimous.
appellation = Appalachian.
culpable = capable.
collusion = collision.
condescension = condensation.
cooperate = corroborate.
curdle = cuddle.
discussed = disgust.
festival = vegetable.
elicit = illicit.
interface = interfaith.
irreverent = irrelevant.
melody = malady.
militias = malicious.
precedent = president.
supplies = surprise.
tempter = temperature.
unaware = underwear.
underserved = undeserved.
answered May 24 at 16:08
WaynneWaynne
211 bronze badge
answered May 24 at 16:08
WaynneWaynne
211 bronze badge
answered May 24 at 16:08
WaynneWaynne
211 bronze badge
answered May 24 at 16:08
WaynneWaynne
211 bronze badge
211 bronze badge
1
Hello, Wayne and welcome to ELU. I'm afraid that this answer, which appears to be very subjective (and gives a list of word-pairs which are nothing like minimal pairs), is not suited to the site.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 24 at 16:26
Thank you, Edwin. Sorry you don't like my answer. I think if you listen to "festival" and "vegetable" with an open mind you will know that those two words truly are almost homophones. Peace..
– Waynne
May 24 at 17:27
add a comment |
1
Hello, Wayne and welcome to ELU. I'm afraid that this answer, which appears to be very subjective (and gives a list of word-pairs which are nothing like minimal pairs), is not suited to the site.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 24 at 16:26
Thank you, Edwin. Sorry you don't like my answer. I think if you listen to "festival" and "vegetable" with an open mind you will know that those two words truly are almost homophones. Peace..
– Waynne
May 24 at 17:27
1
1
Hello, Wayne and welcome to ELU. I'm afraid that this answer, which appears to be very subjective (and gives a list of word-pairs which are nothing like minimal pairs), is not suited to the site.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 24 at 16:26
Hello, Wayne and welcome to ELU. I'm afraid that this answer, which appears to be very subjective (and gives a list of word-pairs which are nothing like minimal pairs), is not suited to the site.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 24 at 16:26
Thank you, Edwin. Sorry you don't like my answer. I think if you listen to "festival" and "vegetable" with an open mind you will know that those two words truly are almost homophones. Peace..
– Waynne
May 24 at 17:27
Thank you, Edwin. Sorry you don't like my answer. I think if you listen to "festival" and "vegetable" with an open mind you will know that those two words truly are almost homophones. Peace..
– Waynne
May 24 at 17:27
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80198%2fwhat-word-means-almost-a-homophone%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Can you give an example or two of pairs of words you consider almost homonyms? Do you mean a near rhyme?
– JLG
Aug 31 '12 at 14:04
An English-language example of the phenomenon you describe in Chinese might be a word that differs only in stress (and thus, pitch), such as record as a noun versus record as a verb.
– tchrist♦
Aug 31 '12 at 14:32
One example of tones distinguishing words in (American) English is "valet" vs. "valley." Depending on which syllable you emphasize, you get one word or the other (almost).
– Matt Chambers
Oct 15 '14 at 4:28
Related: What word means “almost a homophobe”?
– Volker Siegel
Jun 12 '15 at 9:35