Is “false concedence” a thing? If not, is there an established term?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1















concedence /kənˈsiːd(ə)ns/

noun
1) The action of conceding; concession, agreement.


Here's what I describe as false concedence:




Expressing that you concede a less consequential point, but only in an effort to show that you are willing to concede points. Your unspoken belief is that you do not concede that point. However if pressured, you are willing to forfeit that belief in order to maintain the perception had always conceded the point.




Is there a name for this sort of action? Technically a lie if unchallenged. But when challenged, the speaker may decide it's inconsequential and change their actions to make it the truth.










share|improve this question

























  • almost white lie but not quite merriam-webster.com/dictionary/white%20lie

    – Carly
    May 23 at 23:22











  • I see nothing wrong with conceding something for the sake of an argument. It doesn't necessarily mean that you agree with the point—merely that you agree to no longer dispute it. There's a difference. I've heard I don't agree, but I'll concede the point (for now).

    – Jason Bassford
    May 23 at 23:32













  • @JasonBassford I guess I'm referring to the "agreement" definition of concede. As in saying "yeah you're right" but thinking "they're not actually right".

    – MrMusAddict
    May 23 at 23:35











  • If somebody says means yes, you're right when they use the word concede, but they don't actually believe the person is right, then they are being deceptive or dishonest—or they are lying (depending on how you look at it). But that doesn't really have anything to do with the word concede itself—because any synonymous word for that one sense of the word could be used.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 24 at 3:02


















1















concedence /kənˈsiːd(ə)ns/

noun
1) The action of conceding; concession, agreement.


Here's what I describe as false concedence:




Expressing that you concede a less consequential point, but only in an effort to show that you are willing to concede points. Your unspoken belief is that you do not concede that point. However if pressured, you are willing to forfeit that belief in order to maintain the perception had always conceded the point.




Is there a name for this sort of action? Technically a lie if unchallenged. But when challenged, the speaker may decide it's inconsequential and change their actions to make it the truth.










share|improve this question

























  • almost white lie but not quite merriam-webster.com/dictionary/white%20lie

    – Carly
    May 23 at 23:22











  • I see nothing wrong with conceding something for the sake of an argument. It doesn't necessarily mean that you agree with the point—merely that you agree to no longer dispute it. There's a difference. I've heard I don't agree, but I'll concede the point (for now).

    – Jason Bassford
    May 23 at 23:32













  • @JasonBassford I guess I'm referring to the "agreement" definition of concede. As in saying "yeah you're right" but thinking "they're not actually right".

    – MrMusAddict
    May 23 at 23:35











  • If somebody says means yes, you're right when they use the word concede, but they don't actually believe the person is right, then they are being deceptive or dishonest—or they are lying (depending on how you look at it). But that doesn't really have anything to do with the word concede itself—because any synonymous word for that one sense of the word could be used.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 24 at 3:02














1












1








1








concedence /kənˈsiːd(ə)ns/

noun
1) The action of conceding; concession, agreement.


Here's what I describe as false concedence:




Expressing that you concede a less consequential point, but only in an effort to show that you are willing to concede points. Your unspoken belief is that you do not concede that point. However if pressured, you are willing to forfeit that belief in order to maintain the perception had always conceded the point.




Is there a name for this sort of action? Technically a lie if unchallenged. But when challenged, the speaker may decide it's inconsequential and change their actions to make it the truth.










share|improve this question














concedence /kənˈsiːd(ə)ns/

noun
1) The action of conceding; concession, agreement.


Here's what I describe as false concedence:




Expressing that you concede a less consequential point, but only in an effort to show that you are willing to concede points. Your unspoken belief is that you do not concede that point. However if pressured, you are willing to forfeit that belief in order to maintain the perception had always conceded the point.




Is there a name for this sort of action? Technically a lie if unchallenged. But when challenged, the speaker may decide it's inconsequential and change their actions to make it the truth.







single-word-requests phrase-requests






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 23 at 23:13









MrMusAddictMrMusAddict

321 bronze badge




321 bronze badge
















  • almost white lie but not quite merriam-webster.com/dictionary/white%20lie

    – Carly
    May 23 at 23:22











  • I see nothing wrong with conceding something for the sake of an argument. It doesn't necessarily mean that you agree with the point—merely that you agree to no longer dispute it. There's a difference. I've heard I don't agree, but I'll concede the point (for now).

    – Jason Bassford
    May 23 at 23:32













  • @JasonBassford I guess I'm referring to the "agreement" definition of concede. As in saying "yeah you're right" but thinking "they're not actually right".

    – MrMusAddict
    May 23 at 23:35











  • If somebody says means yes, you're right when they use the word concede, but they don't actually believe the person is right, then they are being deceptive or dishonest—or they are lying (depending on how you look at it). But that doesn't really have anything to do with the word concede itself—because any synonymous word for that one sense of the word could be used.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 24 at 3:02



















  • almost white lie but not quite merriam-webster.com/dictionary/white%20lie

    – Carly
    May 23 at 23:22











  • I see nothing wrong with conceding something for the sake of an argument. It doesn't necessarily mean that you agree with the point—merely that you agree to no longer dispute it. There's a difference. I've heard I don't agree, but I'll concede the point (for now).

    – Jason Bassford
    May 23 at 23:32













  • @JasonBassford I guess I'm referring to the "agreement" definition of concede. As in saying "yeah you're right" but thinking "they're not actually right".

    – MrMusAddict
    May 23 at 23:35











  • If somebody says means yes, you're right when they use the word concede, but they don't actually believe the person is right, then they are being deceptive or dishonest—or they are lying (depending on how you look at it). But that doesn't really have anything to do with the word concede itself—because any synonymous word for that one sense of the word could be used.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 24 at 3:02

















almost white lie but not quite merriam-webster.com/dictionary/white%20lie

– Carly
May 23 at 23:22





almost white lie but not quite merriam-webster.com/dictionary/white%20lie

– Carly
May 23 at 23:22













I see nothing wrong with conceding something for the sake of an argument. It doesn't necessarily mean that you agree with the point—merely that you agree to no longer dispute it. There's a difference. I've heard I don't agree, but I'll concede the point (for now).

– Jason Bassford
May 23 at 23:32







I see nothing wrong with conceding something for the sake of an argument. It doesn't necessarily mean that you agree with the point—merely that you agree to no longer dispute it. There's a difference. I've heard I don't agree, but I'll concede the point (for now).

– Jason Bassford
May 23 at 23:32















@JasonBassford I guess I'm referring to the "agreement" definition of concede. As in saying "yeah you're right" but thinking "they're not actually right".

– MrMusAddict
May 23 at 23:35





@JasonBassford I guess I'm referring to the "agreement" definition of concede. As in saying "yeah you're right" but thinking "they're not actually right".

– MrMusAddict
May 23 at 23:35













If somebody says means yes, you're right when they use the word concede, but they don't actually believe the person is right, then they are being deceptive or dishonest—or they are lying (depending on how you look at it). But that doesn't really have anything to do with the word concede itself—because any synonymous word for that one sense of the word could be used.

– Jason Bassford
May 24 at 3:02





If somebody says means yes, you're right when they use the word concede, but they don't actually believe the person is right, then they are being deceptive or dishonest—or they are lying (depending on how you look at it). But that doesn't really have anything to do with the word concede itself—because any synonymous word for that one sense of the word could be used.

– Jason Bassford
May 24 at 3:02










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














The idiom agree to differ (disagree) may fit this question: TFD




Of two parties, to mutually accept that they simply do not (and will
not) share the same view on a particular issue, in the interest of
moving past the issue or avoiding further confrontation.




The OED cites this 1699 usage:




1699 R. Ferguson Just & Modest Vindic. Scots Design 202 If
we agree to differ in Religious Matters of less Importance, we might
thereupon possibly better accord.







share|improve this answer


























  • Not quite, I believe. In my scenario, both parties agree to agree, even though in truth one party does not. They do not end the subject saying they disagree - one party opts to say they agree, which would be a lie.

    – MrMusAddict
    May 24 at 1:08











  • +1 Yes, that's what I was getting at in my comment under the question. When you concede a point of an argument, that doesn't mean that you are agreeing with the point itself—simply that you are moving on.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 24 at 2:56



















0














Conceding (concession) might only mean you are ceasing to pursue the argument, as opposed to having been convinced. One might concede for tactical reasons, as you explained. Here's a way to express that:



face-saving solution



Example:




We met with the deputy superintendent. After two hours, we arrived at a face-saving solution: we would present a lease for an address in another school's catchment area. The district would transfer the student to the other school mid-year, omitting the usual proof of residence requirements. For our part, in exchange for a reprieve from the teacher bullying, and a fresh start in another school, we would not file a state complaint.




Explanation: the district did not have to admit any fault, and we wouldn't have to actually move. The administrator explicitly told us he didn't care where we did our laundry, or even where we slept at night.



Here is Cambridge's definition:




done so that other people will continue to respect you: a face-saving exercise/gesture







share|improve this answer




























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f499531%2fis-false-concedence-a-thing-if-not-is-there-an-established-term%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    The idiom agree to differ (disagree) may fit this question: TFD




    Of two parties, to mutually accept that they simply do not (and will
    not) share the same view on a particular issue, in the interest of
    moving past the issue or avoiding further confrontation.




    The OED cites this 1699 usage:




    1699 R. Ferguson Just & Modest Vindic. Scots Design 202 If
    we agree to differ in Religious Matters of less Importance, we might
    thereupon possibly better accord.







    share|improve this answer


























    • Not quite, I believe. In my scenario, both parties agree to agree, even though in truth one party does not. They do not end the subject saying they disagree - one party opts to say they agree, which would be a lie.

      – MrMusAddict
      May 24 at 1:08











    • +1 Yes, that's what I was getting at in my comment under the question. When you concede a point of an argument, that doesn't mean that you are agreeing with the point itself—simply that you are moving on.

      – Jason Bassford
      May 24 at 2:56
















    1














    The idiom agree to differ (disagree) may fit this question: TFD




    Of two parties, to mutually accept that they simply do not (and will
    not) share the same view on a particular issue, in the interest of
    moving past the issue or avoiding further confrontation.




    The OED cites this 1699 usage:




    1699 R. Ferguson Just & Modest Vindic. Scots Design 202 If
    we agree to differ in Religious Matters of less Importance, we might
    thereupon possibly better accord.







    share|improve this answer


























    • Not quite, I believe. In my scenario, both parties agree to agree, even though in truth one party does not. They do not end the subject saying they disagree - one party opts to say they agree, which would be a lie.

      – MrMusAddict
      May 24 at 1:08











    • +1 Yes, that's what I was getting at in my comment under the question. When you concede a point of an argument, that doesn't mean that you are agreeing with the point itself—simply that you are moving on.

      – Jason Bassford
      May 24 at 2:56














    1












    1








    1







    The idiom agree to differ (disagree) may fit this question: TFD




    Of two parties, to mutually accept that they simply do not (and will
    not) share the same view on a particular issue, in the interest of
    moving past the issue or avoiding further confrontation.




    The OED cites this 1699 usage:




    1699 R. Ferguson Just & Modest Vindic. Scots Design 202 If
    we agree to differ in Religious Matters of less Importance, we might
    thereupon possibly better accord.







    share|improve this answer













    The idiom agree to differ (disagree) may fit this question: TFD




    Of two parties, to mutually accept that they simply do not (and will
    not) share the same view on a particular issue, in the interest of
    moving past the issue or avoiding further confrontation.




    The OED cites this 1699 usage:




    1699 R. Ferguson Just & Modest Vindic. Scots Design 202 If
    we agree to differ in Religious Matters of less Importance, we might
    thereupon possibly better accord.








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered May 24 at 0:19









    lbflbf

    25.7k2 gold badges30 silver badges82 bronze badges




    25.7k2 gold badges30 silver badges82 bronze badges
















    • Not quite, I believe. In my scenario, both parties agree to agree, even though in truth one party does not. They do not end the subject saying they disagree - one party opts to say they agree, which would be a lie.

      – MrMusAddict
      May 24 at 1:08











    • +1 Yes, that's what I was getting at in my comment under the question. When you concede a point of an argument, that doesn't mean that you are agreeing with the point itself—simply that you are moving on.

      – Jason Bassford
      May 24 at 2:56



















    • Not quite, I believe. In my scenario, both parties agree to agree, even though in truth one party does not. They do not end the subject saying they disagree - one party opts to say they agree, which would be a lie.

      – MrMusAddict
      May 24 at 1:08











    • +1 Yes, that's what I was getting at in my comment under the question. When you concede a point of an argument, that doesn't mean that you are agreeing with the point itself—simply that you are moving on.

      – Jason Bassford
      May 24 at 2:56

















    Not quite, I believe. In my scenario, both parties agree to agree, even though in truth one party does not. They do not end the subject saying they disagree - one party opts to say they agree, which would be a lie.

    – MrMusAddict
    May 24 at 1:08





    Not quite, I believe. In my scenario, both parties agree to agree, even though in truth one party does not. They do not end the subject saying they disagree - one party opts to say they agree, which would be a lie.

    – MrMusAddict
    May 24 at 1:08













    +1 Yes, that's what I was getting at in my comment under the question. When you concede a point of an argument, that doesn't mean that you are agreeing with the point itself—simply that you are moving on.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 24 at 2:56





    +1 Yes, that's what I was getting at in my comment under the question. When you concede a point of an argument, that doesn't mean that you are agreeing with the point itself—simply that you are moving on.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 24 at 2:56













    0














    Conceding (concession) might only mean you are ceasing to pursue the argument, as opposed to having been convinced. One might concede for tactical reasons, as you explained. Here's a way to express that:



    face-saving solution



    Example:




    We met with the deputy superintendent. After two hours, we arrived at a face-saving solution: we would present a lease for an address in another school's catchment area. The district would transfer the student to the other school mid-year, omitting the usual proof of residence requirements. For our part, in exchange for a reprieve from the teacher bullying, and a fresh start in another school, we would not file a state complaint.




    Explanation: the district did not have to admit any fault, and we wouldn't have to actually move. The administrator explicitly told us he didn't care where we did our laundry, or even where we slept at night.



    Here is Cambridge's definition:




    done so that other people will continue to respect you: a face-saving exercise/gesture







    share|improve this answer






























      0














      Conceding (concession) might only mean you are ceasing to pursue the argument, as opposed to having been convinced. One might concede for tactical reasons, as you explained. Here's a way to express that:



      face-saving solution



      Example:




      We met with the deputy superintendent. After two hours, we arrived at a face-saving solution: we would present a lease for an address in another school's catchment area. The district would transfer the student to the other school mid-year, omitting the usual proof of residence requirements. For our part, in exchange for a reprieve from the teacher bullying, and a fresh start in another school, we would not file a state complaint.




      Explanation: the district did not have to admit any fault, and we wouldn't have to actually move. The administrator explicitly told us he didn't care where we did our laundry, or even where we slept at night.



      Here is Cambridge's definition:




      done so that other people will continue to respect you: a face-saving exercise/gesture







      share|improve this answer




























        0












        0








        0







        Conceding (concession) might only mean you are ceasing to pursue the argument, as opposed to having been convinced. One might concede for tactical reasons, as you explained. Here's a way to express that:



        face-saving solution



        Example:




        We met with the deputy superintendent. After two hours, we arrived at a face-saving solution: we would present a lease for an address in another school's catchment area. The district would transfer the student to the other school mid-year, omitting the usual proof of residence requirements. For our part, in exchange for a reprieve from the teacher bullying, and a fresh start in another school, we would not file a state complaint.




        Explanation: the district did not have to admit any fault, and we wouldn't have to actually move. The administrator explicitly told us he didn't care where we did our laundry, or even where we slept at night.



        Here is Cambridge's definition:




        done so that other people will continue to respect you: a face-saving exercise/gesture







        share|improve this answer













        Conceding (concession) might only mean you are ceasing to pursue the argument, as opposed to having been convinced. One might concede for tactical reasons, as you explained. Here's a way to express that:



        face-saving solution



        Example:




        We met with the deputy superintendent. After two hours, we arrived at a face-saving solution: we would present a lease for an address in another school's catchment area. The district would transfer the student to the other school mid-year, omitting the usual proof of residence requirements. For our part, in exchange for a reprieve from the teacher bullying, and a fresh start in another school, we would not file a state complaint.




        Explanation: the district did not have to admit any fault, and we wouldn't have to actually move. The administrator explicitly told us he didn't care where we did our laundry, or even where we slept at night.



        Here is Cambridge's definition:




        done so that other people will continue to respect you: a face-saving exercise/gesture








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 24 at 16:29









        aparente001aparente001

        15.7k4 gold badges36 silver badges74 bronze badges




        15.7k4 gold badges36 silver badges74 bronze badges

































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f499531%2fis-false-concedence-a-thing-if-not-is-there-an-established-term%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029