Is there a term for clause in a sentence that can be removed without invalidating the remainder of the...
Take, for example, the sentence "The dog, which is in the corner of the room, is barking.". Is there a specific term for the part of the sentence "which is in the corner of the room", which can be removed to leave the valid sentence of "The dog is barking."?
single-word-requests terminology
New contributor
Giles Bennett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
|
show 1 more comment
Take, for example, the sentence "The dog, which is in the corner of the room, is barking.". Is there a specific term for the part of the sentence "which is in the corner of the room", which can be removed to leave the valid sentence of "The dog is barking."?
single-word-requests terminology
New contributor
Giles Bennett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
It's a 1. parenthetical: "a construction that can be used to extend the meaning of a word or phrase but is not one of the main constituents of a sentence" and more broadly, 2. an adjunct: "word or phrase that adds information to a sentence and that can be removed from the sentence without making the sentence ungrammatical"
– Kris
Mar 20 at 10:17
In this case "which is in the corner of the room" is a non-defining (or non-restrictive) relative clause. But what do you mean by 'invalidating the remainder of the sentence'? Do you mean making the remainder sentence ungrammatical? I suspect you can remove most dependent (subordinate clauses) and leave a grammatical fragment.
– Shoe
Mar 20 at 10:28
@Shoe "...and leave a grammatically complete sentence," rather.
– Kris
Mar 20 at 10:33
@Kris. Yes, your wording is better. I meant that the fragment of the sentence that is left after removal of the dependent clause would be grammatical. But as the term "fragment sentence" generally refers to an incomplete sentence, it would not be surprising if my comment is misunderstood.
– Shoe
Mar 20 at 10:42
Note that "invalidating" is a loose term here. You could very easily change the meaning if there are multiple dogs in the room.
– Hot Licks
Mar 20 at 12:31
|
show 1 more comment
Take, for example, the sentence "The dog, which is in the corner of the room, is barking.". Is there a specific term for the part of the sentence "which is in the corner of the room", which can be removed to leave the valid sentence of "The dog is barking."?
single-word-requests terminology
New contributor
Giles Bennett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Take, for example, the sentence "The dog, which is in the corner of the room, is barking.". Is there a specific term for the part of the sentence "which is in the corner of the room", which can be removed to leave the valid sentence of "The dog is barking."?
single-word-requests terminology
single-word-requests terminology
New contributor
Giles Bennett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Giles Bennett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Mar 20 at 10:13
Matt E. Эллен♦
25.4k1488153
25.4k1488153
New contributor
Giles Bennett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Mar 20 at 9:44
Giles BennettGiles Bennett
32
32
New contributor
Giles Bennett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Giles Bennett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Giles Bennett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
It's a 1. parenthetical: "a construction that can be used to extend the meaning of a word or phrase but is not one of the main constituents of a sentence" and more broadly, 2. an adjunct: "word or phrase that adds information to a sentence and that can be removed from the sentence without making the sentence ungrammatical"
– Kris
Mar 20 at 10:17
In this case "which is in the corner of the room" is a non-defining (or non-restrictive) relative clause. But what do you mean by 'invalidating the remainder of the sentence'? Do you mean making the remainder sentence ungrammatical? I suspect you can remove most dependent (subordinate clauses) and leave a grammatical fragment.
– Shoe
Mar 20 at 10:28
@Shoe "...and leave a grammatically complete sentence," rather.
– Kris
Mar 20 at 10:33
@Kris. Yes, your wording is better. I meant that the fragment of the sentence that is left after removal of the dependent clause would be grammatical. But as the term "fragment sentence" generally refers to an incomplete sentence, it would not be surprising if my comment is misunderstood.
– Shoe
Mar 20 at 10:42
Note that "invalidating" is a loose term here. You could very easily change the meaning if there are multiple dogs in the room.
– Hot Licks
Mar 20 at 12:31
|
show 1 more comment
1
It's a 1. parenthetical: "a construction that can be used to extend the meaning of a word or phrase but is not one of the main constituents of a sentence" and more broadly, 2. an adjunct: "word or phrase that adds information to a sentence and that can be removed from the sentence without making the sentence ungrammatical"
– Kris
Mar 20 at 10:17
In this case "which is in the corner of the room" is a non-defining (or non-restrictive) relative clause. But what do you mean by 'invalidating the remainder of the sentence'? Do you mean making the remainder sentence ungrammatical? I suspect you can remove most dependent (subordinate clauses) and leave a grammatical fragment.
– Shoe
Mar 20 at 10:28
@Shoe "...and leave a grammatically complete sentence," rather.
– Kris
Mar 20 at 10:33
@Kris. Yes, your wording is better. I meant that the fragment of the sentence that is left after removal of the dependent clause would be grammatical. But as the term "fragment sentence" generally refers to an incomplete sentence, it would not be surprising if my comment is misunderstood.
– Shoe
Mar 20 at 10:42
Note that "invalidating" is a loose term here. You could very easily change the meaning if there are multiple dogs in the room.
– Hot Licks
Mar 20 at 12:31
1
1
It's a 1. parenthetical: "a construction that can be used to extend the meaning of a word or phrase but is not one of the main constituents of a sentence" and more broadly, 2. an adjunct: "word or phrase that adds information to a sentence and that can be removed from the sentence without making the sentence ungrammatical"
– Kris
Mar 20 at 10:17
It's a 1. parenthetical: "a construction that can be used to extend the meaning of a word or phrase but is not one of the main constituents of a sentence" and more broadly, 2. an adjunct: "word or phrase that adds information to a sentence and that can be removed from the sentence without making the sentence ungrammatical"
– Kris
Mar 20 at 10:17
In this case "which is in the corner of the room" is a non-defining (or non-restrictive) relative clause. But what do you mean by 'invalidating the remainder of the sentence'? Do you mean making the remainder sentence ungrammatical? I suspect you can remove most dependent (subordinate clauses) and leave a grammatical fragment.
– Shoe
Mar 20 at 10:28
In this case "which is in the corner of the room" is a non-defining (or non-restrictive) relative clause. But what do you mean by 'invalidating the remainder of the sentence'? Do you mean making the remainder sentence ungrammatical? I suspect you can remove most dependent (subordinate clauses) and leave a grammatical fragment.
– Shoe
Mar 20 at 10:28
@Shoe "...and leave a grammatically complete sentence," rather.
– Kris
Mar 20 at 10:33
@Shoe "...and leave a grammatically complete sentence," rather.
– Kris
Mar 20 at 10:33
@Kris. Yes, your wording is better. I meant that the fragment of the sentence that is left after removal of the dependent clause would be grammatical. But as the term "fragment sentence" generally refers to an incomplete sentence, it would not be surprising if my comment is misunderstood.
– Shoe
Mar 20 at 10:42
@Kris. Yes, your wording is better. I meant that the fragment of the sentence that is left after removal of the dependent clause would be grammatical. But as the term "fragment sentence" generally refers to an incomplete sentence, it would not be surprising if my comment is misunderstood.
– Shoe
Mar 20 at 10:42
Note that "invalidating" is a loose term here. You could very easily change the meaning if there are multiple dogs in the room.
– Hot Licks
Mar 20 at 12:31
Note that "invalidating" is a loose term here. You could very easily change the meaning if there are multiple dogs in the room.
– Hot Licks
Mar 20 at 12:31
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It is a Parenthesis. It derives its name from the punctuation marks called parentheses, curved brackets — one but not only device employed to mark off any dispensable amplifier be it a phrase, clause , word or sentence. They can be marked off without hampering the meaning of the main sentence or relevant sentence by such punctuation marks as round or square brackets, comas, or dashes.
Any modifier appearing after the noun or pronoun, an appositive, a noun in vocative use, asides in dramas or absolute phases or nominative absolute can safely be called a Parenthesis.
- The dog, which is in the corner of the room, is barking.
The portion marked of by comas can be so done by brackets or dashes as well. It is an example of parenthesis. The spelling is different from that punctuation mark, parentheses it lends its name to.
1
I'd be inclined to call it a 'non-restrictive element'. Such elements can be dropped without altering the basic proposition.
– BillJ
Mar 20 at 13:21
Yes, you're right but it's mostly used for adjective clauses non-defining in nature.
– Barid Baran Acharya
Mar 20 at 13:32
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Giles Bennett is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490545%2fis-there-a-term-for-clause-in-a-sentence-that-can-be-removed-without-invalidatin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It is a Parenthesis. It derives its name from the punctuation marks called parentheses, curved brackets — one but not only device employed to mark off any dispensable amplifier be it a phrase, clause , word or sentence. They can be marked off without hampering the meaning of the main sentence or relevant sentence by such punctuation marks as round or square brackets, comas, or dashes.
Any modifier appearing after the noun or pronoun, an appositive, a noun in vocative use, asides in dramas or absolute phases or nominative absolute can safely be called a Parenthesis.
- The dog, which is in the corner of the room, is barking.
The portion marked of by comas can be so done by brackets or dashes as well. It is an example of parenthesis. The spelling is different from that punctuation mark, parentheses it lends its name to.
1
I'd be inclined to call it a 'non-restrictive element'. Such elements can be dropped without altering the basic proposition.
– BillJ
Mar 20 at 13:21
Yes, you're right but it's mostly used for adjective clauses non-defining in nature.
– Barid Baran Acharya
Mar 20 at 13:32
add a comment |
It is a Parenthesis. It derives its name from the punctuation marks called parentheses, curved brackets — one but not only device employed to mark off any dispensable amplifier be it a phrase, clause , word or sentence. They can be marked off without hampering the meaning of the main sentence or relevant sentence by such punctuation marks as round or square brackets, comas, or dashes.
Any modifier appearing after the noun or pronoun, an appositive, a noun in vocative use, asides in dramas or absolute phases or nominative absolute can safely be called a Parenthesis.
- The dog, which is in the corner of the room, is barking.
The portion marked of by comas can be so done by brackets or dashes as well. It is an example of parenthesis. The spelling is different from that punctuation mark, parentheses it lends its name to.
1
I'd be inclined to call it a 'non-restrictive element'. Such elements can be dropped without altering the basic proposition.
– BillJ
Mar 20 at 13:21
Yes, you're right but it's mostly used for adjective clauses non-defining in nature.
– Barid Baran Acharya
Mar 20 at 13:32
add a comment |
It is a Parenthesis. It derives its name from the punctuation marks called parentheses, curved brackets — one but not only device employed to mark off any dispensable amplifier be it a phrase, clause , word or sentence. They can be marked off without hampering the meaning of the main sentence or relevant sentence by such punctuation marks as round or square brackets, comas, or dashes.
Any modifier appearing after the noun or pronoun, an appositive, a noun in vocative use, asides in dramas or absolute phases or nominative absolute can safely be called a Parenthesis.
- The dog, which is in the corner of the room, is barking.
The portion marked of by comas can be so done by brackets or dashes as well. It is an example of parenthesis. The spelling is different from that punctuation mark, parentheses it lends its name to.
It is a Parenthesis. It derives its name from the punctuation marks called parentheses, curved brackets — one but not only device employed to mark off any dispensable amplifier be it a phrase, clause , word or sentence. They can be marked off without hampering the meaning of the main sentence or relevant sentence by such punctuation marks as round or square brackets, comas, or dashes.
Any modifier appearing after the noun or pronoun, an appositive, a noun in vocative use, asides in dramas or absolute phases or nominative absolute can safely be called a Parenthesis.
- The dog, which is in the corner of the room, is barking.
The portion marked of by comas can be so done by brackets or dashes as well. It is an example of parenthesis. The spelling is different from that punctuation mark, parentheses it lends its name to.
answered Mar 20 at 11:27
Barid Baran AcharyaBarid Baran Acharya
1,988613
1,988613
1
I'd be inclined to call it a 'non-restrictive element'. Such elements can be dropped without altering the basic proposition.
– BillJ
Mar 20 at 13:21
Yes, you're right but it's mostly used for adjective clauses non-defining in nature.
– Barid Baran Acharya
Mar 20 at 13:32
add a comment |
1
I'd be inclined to call it a 'non-restrictive element'. Such elements can be dropped without altering the basic proposition.
– BillJ
Mar 20 at 13:21
Yes, you're right but it's mostly used for adjective clauses non-defining in nature.
– Barid Baran Acharya
Mar 20 at 13:32
1
1
I'd be inclined to call it a 'non-restrictive element'. Such elements can be dropped without altering the basic proposition.
– BillJ
Mar 20 at 13:21
I'd be inclined to call it a 'non-restrictive element'. Such elements can be dropped without altering the basic proposition.
– BillJ
Mar 20 at 13:21
Yes, you're right but it's mostly used for adjective clauses non-defining in nature.
– Barid Baran Acharya
Mar 20 at 13:32
Yes, you're right but it's mostly used for adjective clauses non-defining in nature.
– Barid Baran Acharya
Mar 20 at 13:32
add a comment |
Giles Bennett is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Giles Bennett is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Giles Bennett is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Giles Bennett is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490545%2fis-there-a-term-for-clause-in-a-sentence-that-can-be-removed-without-invalidatin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
It's a 1. parenthetical: "a construction that can be used to extend the meaning of a word or phrase but is not one of the main constituents of a sentence" and more broadly, 2. an adjunct: "word or phrase that adds information to a sentence and that can be removed from the sentence without making the sentence ungrammatical"
– Kris
Mar 20 at 10:17
In this case "which is in the corner of the room" is a non-defining (or non-restrictive) relative clause. But what do you mean by 'invalidating the remainder of the sentence'? Do you mean making the remainder sentence ungrammatical? I suspect you can remove most dependent (subordinate clauses) and leave a grammatical fragment.
– Shoe
Mar 20 at 10:28
@Shoe "...and leave a grammatically complete sentence," rather.
– Kris
Mar 20 at 10:33
@Kris. Yes, your wording is better. I meant that the fragment of the sentence that is left after removal of the dependent clause would be grammatical. But as the term "fragment sentence" generally refers to an incomplete sentence, it would not be surprising if my comment is misunderstood.
– Shoe
Mar 20 at 10:42
Note that "invalidating" is a loose term here. You could very easily change the meaning if there are multiple dogs in the room.
– Hot Licks
Mar 20 at 12:31