How to form possessive for a list of people? “(Jane Doe and I)'s” [duplicate]“My wife and I's seafood collaboration dinner”Possessive form for words ending in “y”How to use the possessive form when referring to someone else and yourself?Possessive form of “one of [a list]”?Use of possessive form in this phrase?Correct form of possessive for surname “Woods”How to use possessive form for proper nouns that already have an apostropheHow do we form the possessive of a noun that is possessive in form?How to express possessivePossessive form of “which”

How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?

Combinable filters

Examples of subgroups where it's nontrivial to show closure under multiplication?

Rivers without rain

What are the potential pitfalls when using metals as a currency?

What software provides a code editing environment on iPad?

Is the claim "Employers won't employ people with no 'social media presence'" realistic?

Is this homebrew Wind Wave spell balanced?

How to solve constants out of the internal energy equation?

How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?

Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?

Size of electromagnet needed to replicate Earth's magnetic field

web3.py web3.isConnected() returns false always

What is Niska's accent?

Is the 5 MB static resource size limit 5,242,880 bytes or 5,000,000 bytes?

Binary Numbers Magic Trick

Exchange,swap or switch

How can I practically buy stocks?

Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?

Fizzy, soft, pop and still drinks

How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?

How would one muzzle a full grown polar bear in the 13th century?

Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?

Is it idiomatic to construct against `this`?



How to form possessive for a list of people? “(Jane Doe and I)'s” [duplicate]


“My wife and I's seafood collaboration dinner”Possessive form for words ending in “y”How to use the possessive form when referring to someone else and yourself?Possessive form of “one of [a list]”?Use of possessive form in this phrase?Correct form of possessive for surname “Woods”How to use possessive form for proper nouns that already have an apostropheHow do we form the possessive of a noun that is possessive in form?How to express possessivePossessive form of “which”






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0
















This question already has an answer here:



  • “My wife and I's seafood collaboration dinner”

    6 answers



I'm writing a sentence, and I'm not sure if it's grammatically correct.




Here are my partner, Jane Doe, and I's completed assignment.




Would this be alright? I never know how to properly use possessives when I'm including myself and someone else.



Also, in case you didn't see my comment below, I need to include my partner's name. It can't just be "me and my partner's completed assignment". Otherwise, I wouldn't have an issue.










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Michael Harvey, JJJ, choster, Mitch, TrevorD Apr 10 at 23:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • I'm not sure why my post was downvoted, but I wanted to clarify that I do need to write my partner's name within that sentence. It can't just be "me and my partner's".

    – alex
    Mar 29 at 16:10











  • @Juhasz The only reason why I don't consider this post a duplicate is because I need to include a name, as I've already stated in my comment.

    – alex
    Mar 29 at 16:12











  • "My wife" functions just like a name in that phrase. The same logic should apply to "Jane Doe and I's dinner" or to "Jane Doe and I's assignment" (and that downvote didn't come from me, by the way - I think this is a fine question, just already has an answer)

    – Juhasz
    Mar 29 at 16:15











  • @Juhasz Okay, so correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I read, it's saying that although what I wrote is alright, the correct form would be, "my partner's, Jane Doe, and my completed assignment". That sounds incorrect to me. (Also, no worries! I didn't assume that that downvote came from you.)

    – alex
    Mar 29 at 16:25






  • 3





    As an unrelated point of grammar, you are only handing in one assignment, so you can't say "Here are"; it has to be "Here is".

    – Hellion
    Mar 29 at 18:01

















0
















This question already has an answer here:



  • “My wife and I's seafood collaboration dinner”

    6 answers



I'm writing a sentence, and I'm not sure if it's grammatically correct.




Here are my partner, Jane Doe, and I's completed assignment.




Would this be alright? I never know how to properly use possessives when I'm including myself and someone else.



Also, in case you didn't see my comment below, I need to include my partner's name. It can't just be "me and my partner's completed assignment". Otherwise, I wouldn't have an issue.










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Michael Harvey, JJJ, choster, Mitch, TrevorD Apr 10 at 23:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • I'm not sure why my post was downvoted, but I wanted to clarify that I do need to write my partner's name within that sentence. It can't just be "me and my partner's".

    – alex
    Mar 29 at 16:10











  • @Juhasz The only reason why I don't consider this post a duplicate is because I need to include a name, as I've already stated in my comment.

    – alex
    Mar 29 at 16:12











  • "My wife" functions just like a name in that phrase. The same logic should apply to "Jane Doe and I's dinner" or to "Jane Doe and I's assignment" (and that downvote didn't come from me, by the way - I think this is a fine question, just already has an answer)

    – Juhasz
    Mar 29 at 16:15











  • @Juhasz Okay, so correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I read, it's saying that although what I wrote is alright, the correct form would be, "my partner's, Jane Doe, and my completed assignment". That sounds incorrect to me. (Also, no worries! I didn't assume that that downvote came from you.)

    – alex
    Mar 29 at 16:25






  • 3





    As an unrelated point of grammar, you are only handing in one assignment, so you can't say "Here are"; it has to be "Here is".

    – Hellion
    Mar 29 at 18:01













0












0








0


1







This question already has an answer here:



  • “My wife and I's seafood collaboration dinner”

    6 answers



I'm writing a sentence, and I'm not sure if it's grammatically correct.




Here are my partner, Jane Doe, and I's completed assignment.




Would this be alright? I never know how to properly use possessives when I'm including myself and someone else.



Also, in case you didn't see my comment below, I need to include my partner's name. It can't just be "me and my partner's completed assignment". Otherwise, I wouldn't have an issue.










share|improve this question

















This question already has an answer here:



  • “My wife and I's seafood collaboration dinner”

    6 answers



I'm writing a sentence, and I'm not sure if it's grammatically correct.




Here are my partner, Jane Doe, and I's completed assignment.




Would this be alright? I never know how to properly use possessives when I'm including myself and someone else.



Also, in case you didn't see my comment below, I need to include my partner's name. It can't just be "me and my partner's completed assignment". Otherwise, I wouldn't have an issue.





This question already has an answer here:



  • “My wife and I's seafood collaboration dinner”

    6 answers







possessives






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 29 at 17:59









Hellion

54.9k14109198




54.9k14109198










asked Mar 29 at 15:45









alexalex

63




63




marked as duplicate by Michael Harvey, JJJ, choster, Mitch, TrevorD Apr 10 at 23:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Michael Harvey, JJJ, choster, Mitch, TrevorD Apr 10 at 23:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • I'm not sure why my post was downvoted, but I wanted to clarify that I do need to write my partner's name within that sentence. It can't just be "me and my partner's".

    – alex
    Mar 29 at 16:10











  • @Juhasz The only reason why I don't consider this post a duplicate is because I need to include a name, as I've already stated in my comment.

    – alex
    Mar 29 at 16:12











  • "My wife" functions just like a name in that phrase. The same logic should apply to "Jane Doe and I's dinner" or to "Jane Doe and I's assignment" (and that downvote didn't come from me, by the way - I think this is a fine question, just already has an answer)

    – Juhasz
    Mar 29 at 16:15











  • @Juhasz Okay, so correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I read, it's saying that although what I wrote is alright, the correct form would be, "my partner's, Jane Doe, and my completed assignment". That sounds incorrect to me. (Also, no worries! I didn't assume that that downvote came from you.)

    – alex
    Mar 29 at 16:25






  • 3





    As an unrelated point of grammar, you are only handing in one assignment, so you can't say "Here are"; it has to be "Here is".

    – Hellion
    Mar 29 at 18:01

















  • I'm not sure why my post was downvoted, but I wanted to clarify that I do need to write my partner's name within that sentence. It can't just be "me and my partner's".

    – alex
    Mar 29 at 16:10











  • @Juhasz The only reason why I don't consider this post a duplicate is because I need to include a name, as I've already stated in my comment.

    – alex
    Mar 29 at 16:12











  • "My wife" functions just like a name in that phrase. The same logic should apply to "Jane Doe and I's dinner" or to "Jane Doe and I's assignment" (and that downvote didn't come from me, by the way - I think this is a fine question, just already has an answer)

    – Juhasz
    Mar 29 at 16:15











  • @Juhasz Okay, so correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I read, it's saying that although what I wrote is alright, the correct form would be, "my partner's, Jane Doe, and my completed assignment". That sounds incorrect to me. (Also, no worries! I didn't assume that that downvote came from you.)

    – alex
    Mar 29 at 16:25






  • 3





    As an unrelated point of grammar, you are only handing in one assignment, so you can't say "Here are"; it has to be "Here is".

    – Hellion
    Mar 29 at 18:01
















I'm not sure why my post was downvoted, but I wanted to clarify that I do need to write my partner's name within that sentence. It can't just be "me and my partner's".

– alex
Mar 29 at 16:10





I'm not sure why my post was downvoted, but I wanted to clarify that I do need to write my partner's name within that sentence. It can't just be "me and my partner's".

– alex
Mar 29 at 16:10













@Juhasz The only reason why I don't consider this post a duplicate is because I need to include a name, as I've already stated in my comment.

– alex
Mar 29 at 16:12





@Juhasz The only reason why I don't consider this post a duplicate is because I need to include a name, as I've already stated in my comment.

– alex
Mar 29 at 16:12













"My wife" functions just like a name in that phrase. The same logic should apply to "Jane Doe and I's dinner" or to "Jane Doe and I's assignment" (and that downvote didn't come from me, by the way - I think this is a fine question, just already has an answer)

– Juhasz
Mar 29 at 16:15





"My wife" functions just like a name in that phrase. The same logic should apply to "Jane Doe and I's dinner" or to "Jane Doe and I's assignment" (and that downvote didn't come from me, by the way - I think this is a fine question, just already has an answer)

– Juhasz
Mar 29 at 16:15













@Juhasz Okay, so correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I read, it's saying that although what I wrote is alright, the correct form would be, "my partner's, Jane Doe, and my completed assignment". That sounds incorrect to me. (Also, no worries! I didn't assume that that downvote came from you.)

– alex
Mar 29 at 16:25





@Juhasz Okay, so correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I read, it's saying that although what I wrote is alright, the correct form would be, "my partner's, Jane Doe, and my completed assignment". That sounds incorrect to me. (Also, no worries! I didn't assume that that downvote came from you.)

– alex
Mar 29 at 16:25




3




3





As an unrelated point of grammar, you are only handing in one assignment, so you can't say "Here are"; it has to be "Here is".

– Hellion
Mar 29 at 18:01





As an unrelated point of grammar, you are only handing in one assignment, so you can't say "Here are"; it has to be "Here is".

– Hellion
Mar 29 at 18:01










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














Without more substantial rephrasing, it will sound strange even if it is technically correct.



It would be more natural if you simply drop the use of the possessive:




Here is the completed assignment of my partner, Jane Doe, and me.







share|improve this answer























  • How is this technically correct? In what universe is I’s a correct form?

    – KarlG
    Mar 30 at 8:30












  • @KarlG I didn't use the text I's.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 13:20


















-1














Basically agreeing with Michael Harvey's offering: Here’s my partner Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.



But the comma of apposition is surely not necessary as "partner Jane Doe's" is a complete phrase. such as: Here is x's and my assignment, where x = partner Jane Doe. (Consider "partner" here as a title, rather than "Jane Doe" being in apposition to partner.)



I propose the correct written form would be:
Here’s my partner Jane Doe’s and my assignment.






share|improve this answer























  • I disagree. The two possessives indicate separate possession. Admittedly, in your particular sentence, the singular "assignment" might make readers think that it's a joint assignment, and thus understand correctly, despite your two possessives. But in another situation with a plural noun, readers wouldn't get that clue. To reliably indicate joint possession you need something like Jason's answer.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 23 at 11:14











  • Thanks for your perspective, @Rosie. Agreed: if the question changes (e.g., "in another situation"), one could expect the answer to change. The original post stipulated a singular "assignment". I contend my original proposal is still correct in that it signifies possession both jointly and severally. If indeed there were multiple "assignments", that could open the door of ambiguity: how many were mine and how many my partner's? Thanks again for noticing the nuance.

    – William Gifford
    Apr 24 at 17:51


















-2














To me, the most grammatical “translation” would be:




Here’s my wife’s, Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.




I feel both components of the apposition should be possessive in order to be correct.






share|improve this answer























  • minor nit: it's about a partner, not a wife. :-)

    – Hellion
    Mar 29 at 17:52






  • 3





    Here’s my wife Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 29 at 18:36


















3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














Without more substantial rephrasing, it will sound strange even if it is technically correct.



It would be more natural if you simply drop the use of the possessive:




Here is the completed assignment of my partner, Jane Doe, and me.







share|improve this answer























  • How is this technically correct? In what universe is I’s a correct form?

    – KarlG
    Mar 30 at 8:30












  • @KarlG I didn't use the text I's.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 13:20















2














Without more substantial rephrasing, it will sound strange even if it is technically correct.



It would be more natural if you simply drop the use of the possessive:




Here is the completed assignment of my partner, Jane Doe, and me.







share|improve this answer























  • How is this technically correct? In what universe is I’s a correct form?

    – KarlG
    Mar 30 at 8:30












  • @KarlG I didn't use the text I's.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 13:20













2












2








2







Without more substantial rephrasing, it will sound strange even if it is technically correct.



It would be more natural if you simply drop the use of the possessive:




Here is the completed assignment of my partner, Jane Doe, and me.







share|improve this answer













Without more substantial rephrasing, it will sound strange even if it is technically correct.



It would be more natural if you simply drop the use of the possessive:




Here is the completed assignment of my partner, Jane Doe, and me.








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 29 at 16:32









Jason BassfordJason Bassford

21.5k32753




21.5k32753












  • How is this technically correct? In what universe is I’s a correct form?

    – KarlG
    Mar 30 at 8:30












  • @KarlG I didn't use the text I's.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 13:20

















  • How is this technically correct? In what universe is I’s a correct form?

    – KarlG
    Mar 30 at 8:30












  • @KarlG I didn't use the text I's.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 13:20
















How is this technically correct? In what universe is I’s a correct form?

– KarlG
Mar 30 at 8:30






How is this technically correct? In what universe is I’s a correct form?

– KarlG
Mar 30 at 8:30














@KarlG I didn't use the text I's.

– Jason Bassford
Mar 30 at 13:20





@KarlG I didn't use the text I's.

– Jason Bassford
Mar 30 at 13:20













-1














Basically agreeing with Michael Harvey's offering: Here’s my partner Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.



But the comma of apposition is surely not necessary as "partner Jane Doe's" is a complete phrase. such as: Here is x's and my assignment, where x = partner Jane Doe. (Consider "partner" here as a title, rather than "Jane Doe" being in apposition to partner.)



I propose the correct written form would be:
Here’s my partner Jane Doe’s and my assignment.






share|improve this answer























  • I disagree. The two possessives indicate separate possession. Admittedly, in your particular sentence, the singular "assignment" might make readers think that it's a joint assignment, and thus understand correctly, despite your two possessives. But in another situation with a plural noun, readers wouldn't get that clue. To reliably indicate joint possession you need something like Jason's answer.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 23 at 11:14











  • Thanks for your perspective, @Rosie. Agreed: if the question changes (e.g., "in another situation"), one could expect the answer to change. The original post stipulated a singular "assignment". I contend my original proposal is still correct in that it signifies possession both jointly and severally. If indeed there were multiple "assignments", that could open the door of ambiguity: how many were mine and how many my partner's? Thanks again for noticing the nuance.

    – William Gifford
    Apr 24 at 17:51















-1














Basically agreeing with Michael Harvey's offering: Here’s my partner Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.



But the comma of apposition is surely not necessary as "partner Jane Doe's" is a complete phrase. such as: Here is x's and my assignment, where x = partner Jane Doe. (Consider "partner" here as a title, rather than "Jane Doe" being in apposition to partner.)



I propose the correct written form would be:
Here’s my partner Jane Doe’s and my assignment.






share|improve this answer























  • I disagree. The two possessives indicate separate possession. Admittedly, in your particular sentence, the singular "assignment" might make readers think that it's a joint assignment, and thus understand correctly, despite your two possessives. But in another situation with a plural noun, readers wouldn't get that clue. To reliably indicate joint possession you need something like Jason's answer.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 23 at 11:14











  • Thanks for your perspective, @Rosie. Agreed: if the question changes (e.g., "in another situation"), one could expect the answer to change. The original post stipulated a singular "assignment". I contend my original proposal is still correct in that it signifies possession both jointly and severally. If indeed there were multiple "assignments", that could open the door of ambiguity: how many were mine and how many my partner's? Thanks again for noticing the nuance.

    – William Gifford
    Apr 24 at 17:51













-1












-1








-1







Basically agreeing with Michael Harvey's offering: Here’s my partner Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.



But the comma of apposition is surely not necessary as "partner Jane Doe's" is a complete phrase. such as: Here is x's and my assignment, where x = partner Jane Doe. (Consider "partner" here as a title, rather than "Jane Doe" being in apposition to partner.)



I propose the correct written form would be:
Here’s my partner Jane Doe’s and my assignment.






share|improve this answer













Basically agreeing with Michael Harvey's offering: Here’s my partner Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.



But the comma of apposition is surely not necessary as "partner Jane Doe's" is a complete phrase. such as: Here is x's and my assignment, where x = partner Jane Doe. (Consider "partner" here as a title, rather than "Jane Doe" being in apposition to partner.)



I propose the correct written form would be:
Here’s my partner Jane Doe’s and my assignment.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 31 at 2:40









William GiffordWilliam Gifford

11




11












  • I disagree. The two possessives indicate separate possession. Admittedly, in your particular sentence, the singular "assignment" might make readers think that it's a joint assignment, and thus understand correctly, despite your two possessives. But in another situation with a plural noun, readers wouldn't get that clue. To reliably indicate joint possession you need something like Jason's answer.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 23 at 11:14











  • Thanks for your perspective, @Rosie. Agreed: if the question changes (e.g., "in another situation"), one could expect the answer to change. The original post stipulated a singular "assignment". I contend my original proposal is still correct in that it signifies possession both jointly and severally. If indeed there were multiple "assignments", that could open the door of ambiguity: how many were mine and how many my partner's? Thanks again for noticing the nuance.

    – William Gifford
    Apr 24 at 17:51

















  • I disagree. The two possessives indicate separate possession. Admittedly, in your particular sentence, the singular "assignment" might make readers think that it's a joint assignment, and thus understand correctly, despite your two possessives. But in another situation with a plural noun, readers wouldn't get that clue. To reliably indicate joint possession you need something like Jason's answer.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 23 at 11:14











  • Thanks for your perspective, @Rosie. Agreed: if the question changes (e.g., "in another situation"), one could expect the answer to change. The original post stipulated a singular "assignment". I contend my original proposal is still correct in that it signifies possession both jointly and severally. If indeed there were multiple "assignments", that could open the door of ambiguity: how many were mine and how many my partner's? Thanks again for noticing the nuance.

    – William Gifford
    Apr 24 at 17:51
















I disagree. The two possessives indicate separate possession. Admittedly, in your particular sentence, the singular "assignment" might make readers think that it's a joint assignment, and thus understand correctly, despite your two possessives. But in another situation with a plural noun, readers wouldn't get that clue. To reliably indicate joint possession you need something like Jason's answer.

– Rosie F
Apr 23 at 11:14





I disagree. The two possessives indicate separate possession. Admittedly, in your particular sentence, the singular "assignment" might make readers think that it's a joint assignment, and thus understand correctly, despite your two possessives. But in another situation with a plural noun, readers wouldn't get that clue. To reliably indicate joint possession you need something like Jason's answer.

– Rosie F
Apr 23 at 11:14













Thanks for your perspective, @Rosie. Agreed: if the question changes (e.g., "in another situation"), one could expect the answer to change. The original post stipulated a singular "assignment". I contend my original proposal is still correct in that it signifies possession both jointly and severally. If indeed there were multiple "assignments", that could open the door of ambiguity: how many were mine and how many my partner's? Thanks again for noticing the nuance.

– William Gifford
Apr 24 at 17:51





Thanks for your perspective, @Rosie. Agreed: if the question changes (e.g., "in another situation"), one could expect the answer to change. The original post stipulated a singular "assignment". I contend my original proposal is still correct in that it signifies possession both jointly and severally. If indeed there were multiple "assignments", that could open the door of ambiguity: how many were mine and how many my partner's? Thanks again for noticing the nuance.

– William Gifford
Apr 24 at 17:51











-2














To me, the most grammatical “translation” would be:




Here’s my wife’s, Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.




I feel both components of the apposition should be possessive in order to be correct.






share|improve this answer























  • minor nit: it's about a partner, not a wife. :-)

    – Hellion
    Mar 29 at 17:52






  • 3





    Here’s my wife Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 29 at 18:36
















-2














To me, the most grammatical “translation” would be:




Here’s my wife’s, Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.




I feel both components of the apposition should be possessive in order to be correct.






share|improve this answer























  • minor nit: it's about a partner, not a wife. :-)

    – Hellion
    Mar 29 at 17:52






  • 3





    Here’s my wife Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 29 at 18:36














-2












-2








-2







To me, the most grammatical “translation” would be:




Here’s my wife’s, Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.




I feel both components of the apposition should be possessive in order to be correct.






share|improve this answer













To me, the most grammatical “translation” would be:




Here’s my wife’s, Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.




I feel both components of the apposition should be possessive in order to be correct.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 29 at 17:31









CocoPopCocoPop

1219




1219












  • minor nit: it's about a partner, not a wife. :-)

    – Hellion
    Mar 29 at 17:52






  • 3





    Here’s my wife Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 29 at 18:36


















  • minor nit: it's about a partner, not a wife. :-)

    – Hellion
    Mar 29 at 17:52






  • 3





    Here’s my wife Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 29 at 18:36

















minor nit: it's about a partner, not a wife. :-)

– Hellion
Mar 29 at 17:52





minor nit: it's about a partner, not a wife. :-)

– Hellion
Mar 29 at 17:52




3




3





Here’s my wife Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.

– Michael Harvey
Mar 29 at 18:36






Here’s my wife Jane Doe’s, and my assignment.

– Michael Harvey
Mar 29 at 18:36




Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029