Under what conditions does the function C = f(A,B) satisfy H(C|A) = H(B)?Measuring entropy for a table (e.g., SQL results)Information of a stream of bitsCan a transcendental number like $e$ or $pi$ be compressed as not algorithmically random?How to compare conditional entropy and mutual information?Why the alphabet of the digital information is composed of 2 elements?One-shot Private Randomness ExtractorFind minimum conditional entropyHigher order empirical entropy is not the entropy of the empirical distribution?Conceptual overview: Self-information, Mutual information, uncertainty, entropyHow realistic is the i.i.d assumption in the definition of Shannon's entropy?

Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?

Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?

What are the potential pitfalls when using metals as a currency?

What does the "ep" capability mean?

How to make a pipeline wait for end-of-file or stop after an error?

The Defining Moment

Map of water taps to fill bottles

Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"

How to write a column outside the braces in a matrix?

How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?

Why isn't the definition of absolute value applied when squaring a radical containing a variable?

How to get a plain text file version of a CP/M .BAS (M-BASIC) program?

Don’t seats that recline flat defeat the purpose of having seatbelts?

Why does nature favour the Laplacian?

Is there a way to get a compiler for the original B programming language?

Why do games have consumables?

How can I place the product on a social media post better?

Is this homebrew Wind Wave spell balanced?

Minor Revision with suggestion of an alternative proof by reviewer

How did Captain America manage to do this?

Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up?

Question about かな and だろう

Interpret a multiple linear regression when Y is log transformed

What is Niska's accent?



Under what conditions does the function C = f(A,B) satisfy H(C|A) = H(B)?


Measuring entropy for a table (e.g., SQL results)Information of a stream of bitsCan a transcendental number like $e$ or $pi$ be compressed as not algorithmically random?How to compare conditional entropy and mutual information?Why the alphabet of the digital information is composed of 2 elements?One-shot Private Randomness ExtractorFind minimum conditional entropyHigher order empirical entropy is not the entropy of the empirical distribution?Conceptual overview: Self-information, Mutual information, uncertainty, entropyHow realistic is the i.i.d assumption in the definition of Shannon's entropy?













3












$begingroup$


Suppose we have a function $f$,



$$
C = f(A,B),
$$



where $A$, $B$ and $C$ are random variables.



I notice that when the random variables are binary ($0, 1$) and $f$ is the XOR operation, we have the following identity:



$$
H(C|A) = H(B),
$$



where $H(B)$ is the entropy of $B$ and $H(C|A)$ is the conditional entropy of $C$ given $A$.



Obviously this is not true for a general $f$. What I am interested to know is, is there a set of conditions on $f$ and $A,B,C$, under which the identity above holds.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The function needs to be injective with respect to its second argument.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Mar 28 at 8:04










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus Ah that makes sense! I didn't know the term "injective". Do you want to elaborate a bit and write an answer so I can upvote it?
    $endgroup$
    – hklel
    Mar 28 at 8:11















3












$begingroup$


Suppose we have a function $f$,



$$
C = f(A,B),
$$



where $A$, $B$ and $C$ are random variables.



I notice that when the random variables are binary ($0, 1$) and $f$ is the XOR operation, we have the following identity:



$$
H(C|A) = H(B),
$$



where $H(B)$ is the entropy of $B$ and $H(C|A)$ is the conditional entropy of $C$ given $A$.



Obviously this is not true for a general $f$. What I am interested to know is, is there a set of conditions on $f$ and $A,B,C$, under which the identity above holds.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The function needs to be injective with respect to its second argument.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Mar 28 at 8:04










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus Ah that makes sense! I didn't know the term "injective". Do you want to elaborate a bit and write an answer so I can upvote it?
    $endgroup$
    – hklel
    Mar 28 at 8:11













3












3








3





$begingroup$


Suppose we have a function $f$,



$$
C = f(A,B),
$$



where $A$, $B$ and $C$ are random variables.



I notice that when the random variables are binary ($0, 1$) and $f$ is the XOR operation, we have the following identity:



$$
H(C|A) = H(B),
$$



where $H(B)$ is the entropy of $B$ and $H(C|A)$ is the conditional entropy of $C$ given $A$.



Obviously this is not true for a general $f$. What I am interested to know is, is there a set of conditions on $f$ and $A,B,C$, under which the identity above holds.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Suppose we have a function $f$,



$$
C = f(A,B),
$$



where $A$, $B$ and $C$ are random variables.



I notice that when the random variables are binary ($0, 1$) and $f$ is the XOR operation, we have the following identity:



$$
H(C|A) = H(B),
$$



where $H(B)$ is the entropy of $B$ and $H(C|A)$ is the conditional entropy of $C$ given $A$.



Obviously this is not true for a general $f$. What I am interested to know is, is there a set of conditions on $f$ and $A,B,C$, under which the identity above holds.







information-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 1 at 5:51







hklel

















asked Mar 28 at 7:20









hklelhklel

1255




1255







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The function needs to be injective with respect to its second argument.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Mar 28 at 8:04










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus Ah that makes sense! I didn't know the term "injective". Do you want to elaborate a bit and write an answer so I can upvote it?
    $endgroup$
    – hklel
    Mar 28 at 8:11












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The function needs to be injective with respect to its second argument.
    $endgroup$
    – Yuval Filmus
    Mar 28 at 8:04










  • $begingroup$
    @YuvalFilmus Ah that makes sense! I didn't know the term "injective". Do you want to elaborate a bit and write an answer so I can upvote it?
    $endgroup$
    – hklel
    Mar 28 at 8:11







1




1




$begingroup$
The function needs to be injective with respect to its second argument.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Mar 28 at 8:04




$begingroup$
The function needs to be injective with respect to its second argument.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
Mar 28 at 8:04












$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus Ah that makes sense! I didn't know the term "injective". Do you want to elaborate a bit and write an answer so I can upvote it?
$endgroup$
– hklel
Mar 28 at 8:11




$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus Ah that makes sense! I didn't know the term "injective". Do you want to elaborate a bit and write an answer so I can upvote it?
$endgroup$
– hklel
Mar 28 at 8:11










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

The following answer assumes that $A,B$ are independent, and that $A,B$ have full support on their respective domains (the latter is without loss of generality). For the general case, see the other answer.



Let's write your equation in a slightly different way:
$$
H(B) = H(f(A,B)|A) = operatorname*mathbbE_a sim A H(f(a,B)).
$$

Clearly $H(f(a,B)) leq H(B)$, with equality if and only if $f(a,b_1) neq f(a,b_2)$ whenever $b_1 neq b_2$. We deduce that $H(B) = H(f(A,B)|A)$ if and only if $f$ is injective in its second argument, i.e., for all $a$ and $b_1 neq b_2$, we have $f(a,b_1) neq f(a,b_2)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $H(f(A,B)|A)=mathbbE_aH(f(a,B)|A=a)$, and $H(f(a,B)|A=a)$ is different from $H(f(a,B))$ since $A$ and $B$ may be dependent.
    $endgroup$
    – xskxzr
    Mar 28 at 8:45







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The conclusion that $f$ is injective in the second argument is only correct if $Pr(A=a)>0$ and $Pr(B=b)>0$ for all $(a,b)inoperatornamedom(f)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    Mar 28 at 10:03



















8












$begingroup$

Note



beginalign
0&=H(C|A,B)\
&=H(A,B,C)-H(A,B)\
&=H(B|A,C)+H(C|A)+H(A)-H(A,B)quadtext(chain rule)\
&=H(B|A,C)+H(C|A)-H(B|A),
endalign



so $H(C|A)=H(B)$ is equivalently $H(B|A,C)+H(B)-H(B|A)=0$. Also note $H(B|A,C)ge 0$ and $H(B)ge H(B|A)$, your condition is equivalently $H(B|A,C)=0wedge H(B)=H(B|A)$.



For a human-readable explanation, $H(B|A,C)=0$ means $B$ is determined by $A$ and $C$, that is, for any fixed $a$ in the support of $A$, $f(a,b)$ as a function of $b$ with domain $bmid mathrmPrA=a, B=b>0$ is an injection. $H(B)=H(B|A)$ means $A$ and $B$ are independent of each other.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The conclusion that $f$ is injective in the second argument is only correct if $Pr(A=a)>0$ and $Pr(B=b)>0$ for all $(a,b)inoperatornamedom(f)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    Mar 28 at 10:04










  • $begingroup$
    @EmilJeřábek Thanks, fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – xskxzr
    Mar 28 at 10:34











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "419"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106156%2funder-what-conditions-does-the-function-c-fa-b-satisfy-hca-hb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

The following answer assumes that $A,B$ are independent, and that $A,B$ have full support on their respective domains (the latter is without loss of generality). For the general case, see the other answer.



Let's write your equation in a slightly different way:
$$
H(B) = H(f(A,B)|A) = operatorname*mathbbE_a sim A H(f(a,B)).
$$

Clearly $H(f(a,B)) leq H(B)$, with equality if and only if $f(a,b_1) neq f(a,b_2)$ whenever $b_1 neq b_2$. We deduce that $H(B) = H(f(A,B)|A)$ if and only if $f$ is injective in its second argument, i.e., for all $a$ and $b_1 neq b_2$, we have $f(a,b_1) neq f(a,b_2)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $H(f(A,B)|A)=mathbbE_aH(f(a,B)|A=a)$, and $H(f(a,B)|A=a)$ is different from $H(f(a,B))$ since $A$ and $B$ may be dependent.
    $endgroup$
    – xskxzr
    Mar 28 at 8:45







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The conclusion that $f$ is injective in the second argument is only correct if $Pr(A=a)>0$ and $Pr(B=b)>0$ for all $(a,b)inoperatornamedom(f)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    Mar 28 at 10:03
















4












$begingroup$

The following answer assumes that $A,B$ are independent, and that $A,B$ have full support on their respective domains (the latter is without loss of generality). For the general case, see the other answer.



Let's write your equation in a slightly different way:
$$
H(B) = H(f(A,B)|A) = operatorname*mathbbE_a sim A H(f(a,B)).
$$

Clearly $H(f(a,B)) leq H(B)$, with equality if and only if $f(a,b_1) neq f(a,b_2)$ whenever $b_1 neq b_2$. We deduce that $H(B) = H(f(A,B)|A)$ if and only if $f$ is injective in its second argument, i.e., for all $a$ and $b_1 neq b_2$, we have $f(a,b_1) neq f(a,b_2)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $H(f(A,B)|A)=mathbbE_aH(f(a,B)|A=a)$, and $H(f(a,B)|A=a)$ is different from $H(f(a,B))$ since $A$ and $B$ may be dependent.
    $endgroup$
    – xskxzr
    Mar 28 at 8:45







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The conclusion that $f$ is injective in the second argument is only correct if $Pr(A=a)>0$ and $Pr(B=b)>0$ for all $(a,b)inoperatornamedom(f)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    Mar 28 at 10:03














4












4








4





$begingroup$

The following answer assumes that $A,B$ are independent, and that $A,B$ have full support on their respective domains (the latter is without loss of generality). For the general case, see the other answer.



Let's write your equation in a slightly different way:
$$
H(B) = H(f(A,B)|A) = operatorname*mathbbE_a sim A H(f(a,B)).
$$

Clearly $H(f(a,B)) leq H(B)$, with equality if and only if $f(a,b_1) neq f(a,b_2)$ whenever $b_1 neq b_2$. We deduce that $H(B) = H(f(A,B)|A)$ if and only if $f$ is injective in its second argument, i.e., for all $a$ and $b_1 neq b_2$, we have $f(a,b_1) neq f(a,b_2)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The following answer assumes that $A,B$ are independent, and that $A,B$ have full support on their respective domains (the latter is without loss of generality). For the general case, see the other answer.



Let's write your equation in a slightly different way:
$$
H(B) = H(f(A,B)|A) = operatorname*mathbbE_a sim A H(f(a,B)).
$$

Clearly $H(f(a,B)) leq H(B)$, with equality if and only if $f(a,b_1) neq f(a,b_2)$ whenever $b_1 neq b_2$. We deduce that $H(B) = H(f(A,B)|A)$ if and only if $f$ is injective in its second argument, i.e., for all $a$ and $b_1 neq b_2$, we have $f(a,b_1) neq f(a,b_2)$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 28 at 10:12

























answered Mar 28 at 8:28









Yuval FilmusYuval Filmus

197k15187350




197k15187350







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $H(f(A,B)|A)=mathbbE_aH(f(a,B)|A=a)$, and $H(f(a,B)|A=a)$ is different from $H(f(a,B))$ since $A$ and $B$ may be dependent.
    $endgroup$
    – xskxzr
    Mar 28 at 8:45







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The conclusion that $f$ is injective in the second argument is only correct if $Pr(A=a)>0$ and $Pr(B=b)>0$ for all $(a,b)inoperatornamedom(f)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    Mar 28 at 10:03













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $H(f(A,B)|A)=mathbbE_aH(f(a,B)|A=a)$, and $H(f(a,B)|A=a)$ is different from $H(f(a,B))$ since $A$ and $B$ may be dependent.
    $endgroup$
    – xskxzr
    Mar 28 at 8:45







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The conclusion that $f$ is injective in the second argument is only correct if $Pr(A=a)>0$ and $Pr(B=b)>0$ for all $(a,b)inoperatornamedom(f)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    Mar 28 at 10:03








1




1




$begingroup$
$H(f(A,B)|A)=mathbbE_aH(f(a,B)|A=a)$, and $H(f(a,B)|A=a)$ is different from $H(f(a,B))$ since $A$ and $B$ may be dependent.
$endgroup$
– xskxzr
Mar 28 at 8:45





$begingroup$
$H(f(A,B)|A)=mathbbE_aH(f(a,B)|A=a)$, and $H(f(a,B)|A=a)$ is different from $H(f(a,B))$ since $A$ and $B$ may be dependent.
$endgroup$
– xskxzr
Mar 28 at 8:45





3




3




$begingroup$
The conclusion that $f$ is injective in the second argument is only correct if $Pr(A=a)>0$ and $Pr(B=b)>0$ for all $(a,b)inoperatornamedom(f)$.
$endgroup$
– Emil Jeřábek
Mar 28 at 10:03





$begingroup$
The conclusion that $f$ is injective in the second argument is only correct if $Pr(A=a)>0$ and $Pr(B=b)>0$ for all $(a,b)inoperatornamedom(f)$.
$endgroup$
– Emil Jeřábek
Mar 28 at 10:03












8












$begingroup$

Note



beginalign
0&=H(C|A,B)\
&=H(A,B,C)-H(A,B)\
&=H(B|A,C)+H(C|A)+H(A)-H(A,B)quadtext(chain rule)\
&=H(B|A,C)+H(C|A)-H(B|A),
endalign



so $H(C|A)=H(B)$ is equivalently $H(B|A,C)+H(B)-H(B|A)=0$. Also note $H(B|A,C)ge 0$ and $H(B)ge H(B|A)$, your condition is equivalently $H(B|A,C)=0wedge H(B)=H(B|A)$.



For a human-readable explanation, $H(B|A,C)=0$ means $B$ is determined by $A$ and $C$, that is, for any fixed $a$ in the support of $A$, $f(a,b)$ as a function of $b$ with domain $bmid mathrmPrA=a, B=b>0$ is an injection. $H(B)=H(B|A)$ means $A$ and $B$ are independent of each other.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The conclusion that $f$ is injective in the second argument is only correct if $Pr(A=a)>0$ and $Pr(B=b)>0$ for all $(a,b)inoperatornamedom(f)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    Mar 28 at 10:04










  • $begingroup$
    @EmilJeřábek Thanks, fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – xskxzr
    Mar 28 at 10:34















8












$begingroup$

Note



beginalign
0&=H(C|A,B)\
&=H(A,B,C)-H(A,B)\
&=H(B|A,C)+H(C|A)+H(A)-H(A,B)quadtext(chain rule)\
&=H(B|A,C)+H(C|A)-H(B|A),
endalign



so $H(C|A)=H(B)$ is equivalently $H(B|A,C)+H(B)-H(B|A)=0$. Also note $H(B|A,C)ge 0$ and $H(B)ge H(B|A)$, your condition is equivalently $H(B|A,C)=0wedge H(B)=H(B|A)$.



For a human-readable explanation, $H(B|A,C)=0$ means $B$ is determined by $A$ and $C$, that is, for any fixed $a$ in the support of $A$, $f(a,b)$ as a function of $b$ with domain $bmid mathrmPrA=a, B=b>0$ is an injection. $H(B)=H(B|A)$ means $A$ and $B$ are independent of each other.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The conclusion that $f$ is injective in the second argument is only correct if $Pr(A=a)>0$ and $Pr(B=b)>0$ for all $(a,b)inoperatornamedom(f)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    Mar 28 at 10:04










  • $begingroup$
    @EmilJeřábek Thanks, fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – xskxzr
    Mar 28 at 10:34













8












8








8





$begingroup$

Note



beginalign
0&=H(C|A,B)\
&=H(A,B,C)-H(A,B)\
&=H(B|A,C)+H(C|A)+H(A)-H(A,B)quadtext(chain rule)\
&=H(B|A,C)+H(C|A)-H(B|A),
endalign



so $H(C|A)=H(B)$ is equivalently $H(B|A,C)+H(B)-H(B|A)=0$. Also note $H(B|A,C)ge 0$ and $H(B)ge H(B|A)$, your condition is equivalently $H(B|A,C)=0wedge H(B)=H(B|A)$.



For a human-readable explanation, $H(B|A,C)=0$ means $B$ is determined by $A$ and $C$, that is, for any fixed $a$ in the support of $A$, $f(a,b)$ as a function of $b$ with domain $bmid mathrmPrA=a, B=b>0$ is an injection. $H(B)=H(B|A)$ means $A$ and $B$ are independent of each other.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Note



beginalign
0&=H(C|A,B)\
&=H(A,B,C)-H(A,B)\
&=H(B|A,C)+H(C|A)+H(A)-H(A,B)quadtext(chain rule)\
&=H(B|A,C)+H(C|A)-H(B|A),
endalign



so $H(C|A)=H(B)$ is equivalently $H(B|A,C)+H(B)-H(B|A)=0$. Also note $H(B|A,C)ge 0$ and $H(B)ge H(B|A)$, your condition is equivalently $H(B|A,C)=0wedge H(B)=H(B|A)$.



For a human-readable explanation, $H(B|A,C)=0$ means $B$ is determined by $A$ and $C$, that is, for any fixed $a$ in the support of $A$, $f(a,b)$ as a function of $b$ with domain $bmid mathrmPrA=a, B=b>0$ is an injection. $H(B)=H(B|A)$ means $A$ and $B$ are independent of each other.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 28 at 10:34

























answered Mar 28 at 8:38









xskxzrxskxzr

4,36621033




4,36621033







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The conclusion that $f$ is injective in the second argument is only correct if $Pr(A=a)>0$ and $Pr(B=b)>0$ for all $(a,b)inoperatornamedom(f)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    Mar 28 at 10:04










  • $begingroup$
    @EmilJeřábek Thanks, fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – xskxzr
    Mar 28 at 10:34












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The conclusion that $f$ is injective in the second argument is only correct if $Pr(A=a)>0$ and $Pr(B=b)>0$ for all $(a,b)inoperatornamedom(f)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    Mar 28 at 10:04










  • $begingroup$
    @EmilJeřábek Thanks, fixed.
    $endgroup$
    – xskxzr
    Mar 28 at 10:34







2




2




$begingroup$
The conclusion that $f$ is injective in the second argument is only correct if $Pr(A=a)>0$ and $Pr(B=b)>0$ for all $(a,b)inoperatornamedom(f)$.
$endgroup$
– Emil Jeřábek
Mar 28 at 10:04




$begingroup$
The conclusion that $f$ is injective in the second argument is only correct if $Pr(A=a)>0$ and $Pr(B=b)>0$ for all $(a,b)inoperatornamedom(f)$.
$endgroup$
– Emil Jeřábek
Mar 28 at 10:04












$begingroup$
@EmilJeřábek Thanks, fixed.
$endgroup$
– xskxzr
Mar 28 at 10:34




$begingroup$
@EmilJeřábek Thanks, fixed.
$endgroup$
– xskxzr
Mar 28 at 10:34

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106156%2funder-what-conditions-does-the-function-c-fa-b-satisfy-hca-hb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029