Chain link speeds
What are the different chain link speeds and why are they important or what is the difference?
I have recently broken one of my chain links on one side while cycling. Wishing to fix it I discovered a user describes his similar situation in the stack question here.
I noticed the manufacturer KMC offers 10-speed and 11-speed, does the speed denote the sizing and weight or its chain connector and locking mechanism?
chain
asked May 12 at 16:00
aitíaaitía
395
add a comment |
What are the different chain link speeds and why are they important or what is the difference?
I have recently broken one of my chain links on one side while cycling. Wishing to fix it I discovered a user describes his similar situation in the stack question here.
I noticed the manufacturer KMC offers 10-speed and 11-speed, does the speed denote the sizing and weight or its chain connector and locking mechanism?
chain
asked May 12 at 16:00
aitíaaitía
395
add a comment |
What are the different chain link speeds and why are they important or what is the difference?
I have recently broken one of my chain links on one side while cycling. Wishing to fix it I discovered a user describes his similar situation in the stack question here.
I noticed the manufacturer KMC offers 10-speed and 11-speed, does the speed denote the sizing and weight or its chain connector and locking mechanism?
chain
asked May 12 at 16:00
aitíaaitía
395
What are the different chain link speeds and why are they important or what is the difference?
I have recently broken one of my chain links on one side while cycling. Wishing to fix it I discovered a user describes his similar situation in the stack question here.
I noticed the manufacturer KMC offers 10-speed and 11-speed, does the speed denote the sizing and weight or its chain connector and locking mechanism?
chain
chain
asked May 12 at 16:00
aitíaaitía
395
asked May 12 at 16:00
aitíaaitía
395
asked May 12 at 16:00
aitíaaitía
395
asked May 12 at 16:00
aitíaaitía
395
asked May 12 at 16:00
aitíaaitía
395
395
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The number of speeds a bike has is a measure of the number of different gears the rider can choose from. Ignoring a couple of historic variations...
When we talk about chain speeds, we count the number of separate sprockets, or gears, that make up the cassette mounted on the rear wheel. A 10 speed chain is used on a bike with 10 sprockets in the cassette and an 11 speed chain is used on one with 11 sprockets in the cassette. Etc.
If you have numbers on the shifter, this will be the same as the highest number on the right hand shifter. Otherwise it’s a case of counting.
The chains themselves get narrower (on the outside dimension) as the number of speeds increases, because the sprockets are squeezed into very nearly the same space, so are placed closer together and the chain needs to fit between them.
The length, the weight, the chain connector and locking mechanism are all separate design choices, but it is considered essential to match the number of speeds on the bike to the speeds of the chain. The user in this question was having problems with a 10 speed chain on a 9 speed bike, falling between the chainrings.
As for the historic exceptions, these would include referencing ‘vintage’ bikes and/or bikes where the number of sprockets at the back is less than 8.
answered May 12 at 16:12
SwiftySwifty
3,9381831
1
Thank you for explaining this to me!
– aitía
May 12 at 16:20
1
"[I]t is considered essential to match the number of speeds on the bike to the speeds of the chain" Is it? My understanding is that a chain suited to more speeds than you have gears (e.g., a ten-speed chain on an eight-speed bike) will work just fine, except that it will be more expensive and less robust.
– David Richerby
May 12 at 17:07
3
@DavidRicherby : An 11- or 10-speed chain might not work properly on an 8-speed cassette. The gap between sprockets being wider and the chain thinner, there might the risk of the chain falling between two sprockets. Although having checked it right now, the sprockets (and the chainrings) effectively 'take' the chain. It doesn't ride on top of teeth as I had suspected.
– Carel
May 12 at 17:27
1
@David fair comment, I’m not backing that up with anything. For the sake of this question, I consider it to be. A chain too wide will cause problems and as you note, a narrower chain will be more expensive. Neither of these are desirable for the OP, be it mechanical or financial. I wanted to try and keep the lid on the can of worms but have failed XD
– Swifty
May 12 at 18:08
2
@Swifty Yeah, for the sake of simple explanation, it's easier to say "Use the right chain" than "You shouldn't use a chain designed for fewer gears than you have; it's probably OK to use a chain designed for higher speeds but they cost more and wear faster so best not o."
– David Richerby
May 12 at 18:11
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "126"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61905%2fchain-link-speeds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The number of speeds a bike has is a measure of the number of different gears the rider can choose from. Ignoring a couple of historic variations...
When we talk about chain speeds, we count the number of separate sprockets, or gears, that make up the cassette mounted on the rear wheel. A 10 speed chain is used on a bike with 10 sprockets in the cassette and an 11 speed chain is used on one with 11 sprockets in the cassette. Etc.
If you have numbers on the shifter, this will be the same as the highest number on the right hand shifter. Otherwise it’s a case of counting.
The chains themselves get narrower (on the outside dimension) as the number of speeds increases, because the sprockets are squeezed into very nearly the same space, so are placed closer together and the chain needs to fit between them.
The length, the weight, the chain connector and locking mechanism are all separate design choices, but it is considered essential to match the number of speeds on the bike to the speeds of the chain. The user in this question was having problems with a 10 speed chain on a 9 speed bike, falling between the chainrings.
As for the historic exceptions, these would include referencing ‘vintage’ bikes and/or bikes where the number of sprockets at the back is less than 8.
answered May 12 at 16:12
SwiftySwifty
3,9381831
1
Thank you for explaining this to me!
– aitía
May 12 at 16:20
1
"[I]t is considered essential to match the number of speeds on the bike to the speeds of the chain" Is it? My understanding is that a chain suited to more speeds than you have gears (e.g., a ten-speed chain on an eight-speed bike) will work just fine, except that it will be more expensive and less robust.
– David Richerby
May 12 at 17:07
3
@DavidRicherby : An 11- or 10-speed chain might not work properly on an 8-speed cassette. The gap between sprockets being wider and the chain thinner, there might the risk of the chain falling between two sprockets. Although having checked it right now, the sprockets (and the chainrings) effectively 'take' the chain. It doesn't ride on top of teeth as I had suspected.
– Carel
May 12 at 17:27
1
@David fair comment, I’m not backing that up with anything. For the sake of this question, I consider it to be. A chain too wide will cause problems and as you note, a narrower chain will be more expensive. Neither of these are desirable for the OP, be it mechanical or financial. I wanted to try and keep the lid on the can of worms but have failed XD
– Swifty
May 12 at 18:08
2
@Swifty Yeah, for the sake of simple explanation, it's easier to say "Use the right chain" than "You shouldn't use a chain designed for fewer gears than you have; it's probably OK to use a chain designed for higher speeds but they cost more and wear faster so best not o."
– David Richerby
May 12 at 18:11
|
show 1 more comment
The number of speeds a bike has is a measure of the number of different gears the rider can choose from. Ignoring a couple of historic variations...
When we talk about chain speeds, we count the number of separate sprockets, or gears, that make up the cassette mounted on the rear wheel. A 10 speed chain is used on a bike with 10 sprockets in the cassette and an 11 speed chain is used on one with 11 sprockets in the cassette. Etc.
If you have numbers on the shifter, this will be the same as the highest number on the right hand shifter. Otherwise it’s a case of counting.
The chains themselves get narrower (on the outside dimension) as the number of speeds increases, because the sprockets are squeezed into very nearly the same space, so are placed closer together and the chain needs to fit between them.
The length, the weight, the chain connector and locking mechanism are all separate design choices, but it is considered essential to match the number of speeds on the bike to the speeds of the chain. The user in this question was having problems with a 10 speed chain on a 9 speed bike, falling between the chainrings.
As for the historic exceptions, these would include referencing ‘vintage’ bikes and/or bikes where the number of sprockets at the back is less than 8.
answered May 12 at 16:12
SwiftySwifty
3,9381831
1
Thank you for explaining this to me!
– aitía
May 12 at 16:20
1
"[I]t is considered essential to match the number of speeds on the bike to the speeds of the chain" Is it? My understanding is that a chain suited to more speeds than you have gears (e.g., a ten-speed chain on an eight-speed bike) will work just fine, except that it will be more expensive and less robust.
– David Richerby
May 12 at 17:07
3
@DavidRicherby : An 11- or 10-speed chain might not work properly on an 8-speed cassette. The gap between sprockets being wider and the chain thinner, there might the risk of the chain falling between two sprockets. Although having checked it right now, the sprockets (and the chainrings) effectively 'take' the chain. It doesn't ride on top of teeth as I had suspected.
– Carel
May 12 at 17:27
1
@David fair comment, I’m not backing that up with anything. For the sake of this question, I consider it to be. A chain too wide will cause problems and as you note, a narrower chain will be more expensive. Neither of these are desirable for the OP, be it mechanical or financial. I wanted to try and keep the lid on the can of worms but have failed XD
– Swifty
May 12 at 18:08
2
@Swifty Yeah, for the sake of simple explanation, it's easier to say "Use the right chain" than "You shouldn't use a chain designed for fewer gears than you have; it's probably OK to use a chain designed for higher speeds but they cost more and wear faster so best not o."
– David Richerby
May 12 at 18:11
|
show 1 more comment
The number of speeds a bike has is a measure of the number of different gears the rider can choose from. Ignoring a couple of historic variations...
When we talk about chain speeds, we count the number of separate sprockets, or gears, that make up the cassette mounted on the rear wheel. A 10 speed chain is used on a bike with 10 sprockets in the cassette and an 11 speed chain is used on one with 11 sprockets in the cassette. Etc.
If you have numbers on the shifter, this will be the same as the highest number on the right hand shifter. Otherwise it’s a case of counting.
The chains themselves get narrower (on the outside dimension) as the number of speeds increases, because the sprockets are squeezed into very nearly the same space, so are placed closer together and the chain needs to fit between them.
The length, the weight, the chain connector and locking mechanism are all separate design choices, but it is considered essential to match the number of speeds on the bike to the speeds of the chain. The user in this question was having problems with a 10 speed chain on a 9 speed bike, falling between the chainrings.
As for the historic exceptions, these would include referencing ‘vintage’ bikes and/or bikes where the number of sprockets at the back is less than 8.
answered May 12 at 16:12
SwiftySwifty
3,9381831
The number of speeds a bike has is a measure of the number of different gears the rider can choose from. Ignoring a couple of historic variations...
When we talk about chain speeds, we count the number of separate sprockets, or gears, that make up the cassette mounted on the rear wheel. A 10 speed chain is used on a bike with 10 sprockets in the cassette and an 11 speed chain is used on one with 11 sprockets in the cassette. Etc.
If you have numbers on the shifter, this will be the same as the highest number on the right hand shifter. Otherwise it’s a case of counting.
The chains themselves get narrower (on the outside dimension) as the number of speeds increases, because the sprockets are squeezed into very nearly the same space, so are placed closer together and the chain needs to fit between them.
The length, the weight, the chain connector and locking mechanism are all separate design choices, but it is considered essential to match the number of speeds on the bike to the speeds of the chain. The user in this question was having problems with a 10 speed chain on a 9 speed bike, falling between the chainrings.
As for the historic exceptions, these would include referencing ‘vintage’ bikes and/or bikes where the number of sprockets at the back is less than 8.
answered May 12 at 16:12
SwiftySwifty
3,9381831
edited May 18 at 13:30
answered May 12 at 16:12
SwiftySwifty
3,9381831
answered May 12 at 16:12
SwiftySwifty
3,9381831
answered May 12 at 16:12
SwiftySwifty
3,9381831
3,9381831
1
Thank you for explaining this to me!
– aitía
May 12 at 16:20
1
"[I]t is considered essential to match the number of speeds on the bike to the speeds of the chain" Is it? My understanding is that a chain suited to more speeds than you have gears (e.g., a ten-speed chain on an eight-speed bike) will work just fine, except that it will be more expensive and less robust.
– David Richerby
May 12 at 17:07
3
@DavidRicherby : An 11- or 10-speed chain might not work properly on an 8-speed cassette. The gap between sprockets being wider and the chain thinner, there might the risk of the chain falling between two sprockets. Although having checked it right now, the sprockets (and the chainrings) effectively 'take' the chain. It doesn't ride on top of teeth as I had suspected.
– Carel
May 12 at 17:27
1
@David fair comment, I’m not backing that up with anything. For the sake of this question, I consider it to be. A chain too wide will cause problems and as you note, a narrower chain will be more expensive. Neither of these are desirable for the OP, be it mechanical or financial. I wanted to try and keep the lid on the can of worms but have failed XD
– Swifty
May 12 at 18:08
2
@Swifty Yeah, for the sake of simple explanation, it's easier to say "Use the right chain" than "You shouldn't use a chain designed for fewer gears than you have; it's probably OK to use a chain designed for higher speeds but they cost more and wear faster so best not o."
– David Richerby
May 12 at 18:11
|
show 1 more comment
1
Thank you for explaining this to me!
– aitía
May 12 at 16:20
1
"[I]t is considered essential to match the number of speeds on the bike to the speeds of the chain" Is it? My understanding is that a chain suited to more speeds than you have gears (e.g., a ten-speed chain on an eight-speed bike) will work just fine, except that it will be more expensive and less robust.
– David Richerby
May 12 at 17:07
3
@DavidRicherby : An 11- or 10-speed chain might not work properly on an 8-speed cassette. The gap between sprockets being wider and the chain thinner, there might the risk of the chain falling between two sprockets. Although having checked it right now, the sprockets (and the chainrings) effectively 'take' the chain. It doesn't ride on top of teeth as I had suspected.
– Carel
May 12 at 17:27
1
@David fair comment, I’m not backing that up with anything. For the sake of this question, I consider it to be. A chain too wide will cause problems and as you note, a narrower chain will be more expensive. Neither of these are desirable for the OP, be it mechanical or financial. I wanted to try and keep the lid on the can of worms but have failed XD
– Swifty
May 12 at 18:08
2
@Swifty Yeah, for the sake of simple explanation, it's easier to say "Use the right chain" than "You shouldn't use a chain designed for fewer gears than you have; it's probably OK to use a chain designed for higher speeds but they cost more and wear faster so best not o."
– David Richerby
May 12 at 18:11
1
1
Thank you for explaining this to me!
– aitía
May 12 at 16:20
Thank you for explaining this to me!
– aitía
May 12 at 16:20
1
1
"[I]t is considered essential to match the number of speeds on the bike to the speeds of the chain" Is it? My understanding is that a chain suited to more speeds than you have gears (e.g., a ten-speed chain on an eight-speed bike) will work just fine, except that it will be more expensive and less robust.
– David Richerby
May 12 at 17:07
"[I]t is considered essential to match the number of speeds on the bike to the speeds of the chain" Is it? My understanding is that a chain suited to more speeds than you have gears (e.g., a ten-speed chain on an eight-speed bike) will work just fine, except that it will be more expensive and less robust.
– David Richerby
May 12 at 17:07
3
3
@DavidRicherby : An 11- or 10-speed chain might not work properly on an 8-speed cassette. The gap between sprockets being wider and the chain thinner, there might the risk of the chain falling between two sprockets. Although having checked it right now, the sprockets (and the chainrings) effectively 'take' the chain. It doesn't ride on top of teeth as I had suspected.
– Carel
May 12 at 17:27
@DavidRicherby : An 11- or 10-speed chain might not work properly on an 8-speed cassette. The gap between sprockets being wider and the chain thinner, there might the risk of the chain falling between two sprockets. Although having checked it right now, the sprockets (and the chainrings) effectively 'take' the chain. It doesn't ride on top of teeth as I had suspected.
– Carel
May 12 at 17:27
1
1
@David fair comment, I’m not backing that up with anything. For the sake of this question, I consider it to be. A chain too wide will cause problems and as you note, a narrower chain will be more expensive. Neither of these are desirable for the OP, be it mechanical or financial. I wanted to try and keep the lid on the can of worms but have failed XD
– Swifty
May 12 at 18:08
@David fair comment, I’m not backing that up with anything. For the sake of this question, I consider it to be. A chain too wide will cause problems and as you note, a narrower chain will be more expensive. Neither of these are desirable for the OP, be it mechanical or financial. I wanted to try and keep the lid on the can of worms but have failed XD
– Swifty
May 12 at 18:08
2
2
@Swifty Yeah, for the sake of simple explanation, it's easier to say "Use the right chain" than "You shouldn't use a chain designed for fewer gears than you have; it's probably OK to use a chain designed for higher speeds but they cost more and wear faster so best not o."
– David Richerby
May 12 at 18:11
@Swifty Yeah, for the sake of simple explanation, it's easier to say "Use the right chain" than "You shouldn't use a chain designed for fewer gears than you have; it's probably OK to use a chain designed for higher speeds but they cost more and wear faster so best not o."
– David Richerby
May 12 at 18:11
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Bicycles Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61905%2fchain-link-speeds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
