What kind of fluid is sand?












11












$begingroup$


Questions:




  1. To what extent is it possible to treat (dry) sand in presence of gravity as a fluid?


  2. How does sand differ from other more standard fluids like liquid substances?



Since the definition of "fluid" is very broad, here I list some less vague points that may help anyone answering:




  • the propagation of waves in sand is different from liquids: if something hits sand I would say that a single wavefront can propagate and it is rapidly damped as it moves away from the impact point. But maybe a strong enough impact can exhibit more ripples?


  • is viscosity present in sand?


  • how does sand behaves at the interfaces with other fluids? Can we define some kind of surface tension when gravity is present?



I would say that having an external gravitational field should be important for sand to manifest these features but I am not completely sure: maybe it is not crucial for the single wavefront after an impact.



Anyway writing this I was not thinking about self gravitation effects and, with exception for the last point, I would assume no interaction with air or other fluids.





Slightly off topic:



It is interesting that we can substitute sand with any ensemble of solid, rigid objects of a fixed size with no interaction except being impenetrable, like sofas. Maybe if said objects can intertwine and bound (like chairs that get stuck together) tha fluid could approximate liquids even more, mimicking covalent or molecular bounds.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You may be interested in liquid sand
    $endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    May 10 at 16:29










  • $begingroup$
    @CortAmmon mind = blown ...
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:48
















11












$begingroup$


Questions:




  1. To what extent is it possible to treat (dry) sand in presence of gravity as a fluid?


  2. How does sand differ from other more standard fluids like liquid substances?



Since the definition of "fluid" is very broad, here I list some less vague points that may help anyone answering:




  • the propagation of waves in sand is different from liquids: if something hits sand I would say that a single wavefront can propagate and it is rapidly damped as it moves away from the impact point. But maybe a strong enough impact can exhibit more ripples?


  • is viscosity present in sand?


  • how does sand behaves at the interfaces with other fluids? Can we define some kind of surface tension when gravity is present?



I would say that having an external gravitational field should be important for sand to manifest these features but I am not completely sure: maybe it is not crucial for the single wavefront after an impact.



Anyway writing this I was not thinking about self gravitation effects and, with exception for the last point, I would assume no interaction with air or other fluids.





Slightly off topic:



It is interesting that we can substitute sand with any ensemble of solid, rigid objects of a fixed size with no interaction except being impenetrable, like sofas. Maybe if said objects can intertwine and bound (like chairs that get stuck together) tha fluid could approximate liquids even more, mimicking covalent or molecular bounds.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You may be interested in liquid sand
    $endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    May 10 at 16:29










  • $begingroup$
    @CortAmmon mind = blown ...
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:48














11












11








11





$begingroup$


Questions:




  1. To what extent is it possible to treat (dry) sand in presence of gravity as a fluid?


  2. How does sand differ from other more standard fluids like liquid substances?



Since the definition of "fluid" is very broad, here I list some less vague points that may help anyone answering:




  • the propagation of waves in sand is different from liquids: if something hits sand I would say that a single wavefront can propagate and it is rapidly damped as it moves away from the impact point. But maybe a strong enough impact can exhibit more ripples?


  • is viscosity present in sand?


  • how does sand behaves at the interfaces with other fluids? Can we define some kind of surface tension when gravity is present?



I would say that having an external gravitational field should be important for sand to manifest these features but I am not completely sure: maybe it is not crucial for the single wavefront after an impact.



Anyway writing this I was not thinking about self gravitation effects and, with exception for the last point, I would assume no interaction with air or other fluids.





Slightly off topic:



It is interesting that we can substitute sand with any ensemble of solid, rigid objects of a fixed size with no interaction except being impenetrable, like sofas. Maybe if said objects can intertwine and bound (like chairs that get stuck together) tha fluid could approximate liquids even more, mimicking covalent or molecular bounds.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Questions:




  1. To what extent is it possible to treat (dry) sand in presence of gravity as a fluid?


  2. How does sand differ from other more standard fluids like liquid substances?



Since the definition of "fluid" is very broad, here I list some less vague points that may help anyone answering:




  • the propagation of waves in sand is different from liquids: if something hits sand I would say that a single wavefront can propagate and it is rapidly damped as it moves away from the impact point. But maybe a strong enough impact can exhibit more ripples?


  • is viscosity present in sand?


  • how does sand behaves at the interfaces with other fluids? Can we define some kind of surface tension when gravity is present?



I would say that having an external gravitational field should be important for sand to manifest these features but I am not completely sure: maybe it is not crucial for the single wavefront after an impact.



Anyway writing this I was not thinking about self gravitation effects and, with exception for the last point, I would assume no interaction with air or other fluids.





Slightly off topic:



It is interesting that we can substitute sand with any ensemble of solid, rigid objects of a fixed size with no interaction except being impenetrable, like sofas. Maybe if said objects can intertwine and bound (like chairs that get stuck together) tha fluid could approximate liquids even more, mimicking covalent or molecular bounds.







fluid-dynamics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited May 10 at 13:53









Nat

3,77242033




3,77242033










asked May 10 at 13:15









france95france95

1,1261321




1,1261321








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You may be interested in liquid sand
    $endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    May 10 at 16:29










  • $begingroup$
    @CortAmmon mind = blown ...
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:48














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You may be interested in liquid sand
    $endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    May 10 at 16:29










  • $begingroup$
    @CortAmmon mind = blown ...
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:48








4




4




$begingroup$
You may be interested in liquid sand
$endgroup$
– Cort Ammon
May 10 at 16:29




$begingroup$
You may be interested in liquid sand
$endgroup$
– Cort Ammon
May 10 at 16:29












$begingroup$
@CortAmmon mind = blown ...
$endgroup$
– france95
May 10 at 17:48




$begingroup$
@CortAmmon mind = blown ...
$endgroup$
– france95
May 10 at 17:48










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Sand at rest really does not behave like a liquid, it behaves more like a solid. When you hit the surface of a flattened sand pile with a flat large object, there will only be a negligible wave in the grain density within the bulk of the pile. In fact, the dominant wave will be a complicated sound-wave within the grains, passed by interfaces between them, and this will be dissipated very quickly because of the imperfections.



But sand does start to behave a little bit like a very special liquid if it is in a special dynamical and dense enough regime which is called a granular flow (here you are correct that gravity typically helps maintain the higher density). The formal criterion is that it must exhibit a sufficiently large shear rate or gradient of average velocities. An example of this would be the moving parts of a pile of sand when it is being poured from a silo. Then, it is possible to write down an effective set of Navier-Stokes equations for its behavior in terms of densities, pressure, and bulk velocities, which are the same type of equations that govern the dynamics of water.



Beware, however, that even in this mode the behavior of the "sand liquids" is that of a highly Non-Newtonian fluid, putting it on par with the behavior of fluids such as thick slime, resin or ketchup. One particular feature includes the fact that the interaction between the layers of the sand of different velocities will depend in rather non-intuitive ways on the relative velocity of the layers. The dissipation in the grain flow is also very high and without external driving, it will quickly kill any shearing. And once the shearing rate drops below the critical level, the grain flow "freezes out" and suddenly behaves more like a solid again.



Finally, when the sand gets very thin and highly agitated (individual grains receive a lot of random kinetic energy), it may behave as a gas for a short time. The key criterion for this mode is that the grains do not collide too much between themselves and the walls (that dissipates a lot of the kinetic energy). This can be hard to sustain if the grains are heavy and when gravity is present. On the other hand, very light grains can really become a "minor gas-like component" of air for longer amounts of time since the air drag (collisions with air molecules) tends to synchronize the grain velocity with the bulk of the air.



As for your question with the "surface wave" on a pile of sand. This is really quite amusing, because I believe all three modes will typically be present. When you hit the surface of the sand with a small object, the sand will move at that point and create local shearing. Possibly, a part of the sand will eject in the air to be "gas-like" for a moment. However, the shearing in the sand that actually stays in the pile does allow for a fluid-type behaviour for a short moment, creating a wave-like ripple. Nevertheless, the relative velocities get quickly dissipated and the ripple freezes out.



So, ending with a tip for creating sand-liquid waves: try making one in a sand pile that is pressed between two cylinders that rotate at different angular velocities so that the shearing rate in the sand is higher than the critical one. It might then be possible to obtain wave-like phenomena!



(A scientific paper on the topic of granular flows that I found particularly clear is A new constitutive law for dense granular flows by Pierre Jop, Yoël Forterre & Olivier Pouliquen)





EDIT: I just noticed that Cort Ammon posted a link to this Liquid sand youtube video by Mark Robber, where a "fluidized bed" is created by letting air bubble through the sand from below. A fluidized bed is created when the drag of the air from below almost precisely counters the gravitational forces on the individual grains. The point is only indirectly about countering gravity. The main point is about getting the grains out of contact, so that they do not dissipate energy as quickly. As a result, less shearing is needed to sustain a fluid-like behavior, and that is also provided by the uneven air flow. Quite ingenious!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer! I was thinking that maybe hitting with enough energy would provoke long lived ripples but probably the roof given by the energy that would melt the sand is still a very short time interval. About granular flow, Navier Stokes means that it could exhibit turbolence and vorticity, or is there some reason to exclude those phenomena?
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @france95 Maybe in principle. But the problem is that since the viscosity is very high, it would be quite difficult to reach sufficient Reynolds numbers in the flow. (Intuitively, the "sand fluid" smoothes out most of the seeds of turbulence by dissipation.) It might be that by the time you are reaching the right Reynolds number, the heating of the sand is so large you are melting it as well :)
    $endgroup$
    – Void
    May 10 at 17:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think maybe the Casson or Bignham models might fit the behaviour, but you would have to make an experiment to make determine if that is true (I was thinking maybe a pipe filled with sand up to half, then a thin stripe of black sand as a marker and finally fill the rest with regular sand. Use a compressor on one end and the sand could flow in something similar to Poiseuille flow but since the stress is small in the middle, that part would flow like a solid block, and at the edges with higher shear rate you'd be able to fit for the right model).
    $endgroup$
    – S V
    May 10 at 18:42














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479163%2fwhat-kind-of-fluid-is-sand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5












$begingroup$

Sand at rest really does not behave like a liquid, it behaves more like a solid. When you hit the surface of a flattened sand pile with a flat large object, there will only be a negligible wave in the grain density within the bulk of the pile. In fact, the dominant wave will be a complicated sound-wave within the grains, passed by interfaces between them, and this will be dissipated very quickly because of the imperfections.



But sand does start to behave a little bit like a very special liquid if it is in a special dynamical and dense enough regime which is called a granular flow (here you are correct that gravity typically helps maintain the higher density). The formal criterion is that it must exhibit a sufficiently large shear rate or gradient of average velocities. An example of this would be the moving parts of a pile of sand when it is being poured from a silo. Then, it is possible to write down an effective set of Navier-Stokes equations for its behavior in terms of densities, pressure, and bulk velocities, which are the same type of equations that govern the dynamics of water.



Beware, however, that even in this mode the behavior of the "sand liquids" is that of a highly Non-Newtonian fluid, putting it on par with the behavior of fluids such as thick slime, resin or ketchup. One particular feature includes the fact that the interaction between the layers of the sand of different velocities will depend in rather non-intuitive ways on the relative velocity of the layers. The dissipation in the grain flow is also very high and without external driving, it will quickly kill any shearing. And once the shearing rate drops below the critical level, the grain flow "freezes out" and suddenly behaves more like a solid again.



Finally, when the sand gets very thin and highly agitated (individual grains receive a lot of random kinetic energy), it may behave as a gas for a short time. The key criterion for this mode is that the grains do not collide too much between themselves and the walls (that dissipates a lot of the kinetic energy). This can be hard to sustain if the grains are heavy and when gravity is present. On the other hand, very light grains can really become a "minor gas-like component" of air for longer amounts of time since the air drag (collisions with air molecules) tends to synchronize the grain velocity with the bulk of the air.



As for your question with the "surface wave" on a pile of sand. This is really quite amusing, because I believe all three modes will typically be present. When you hit the surface of the sand with a small object, the sand will move at that point and create local shearing. Possibly, a part of the sand will eject in the air to be "gas-like" for a moment. However, the shearing in the sand that actually stays in the pile does allow for a fluid-type behaviour for a short moment, creating a wave-like ripple. Nevertheless, the relative velocities get quickly dissipated and the ripple freezes out.



So, ending with a tip for creating sand-liquid waves: try making one in a sand pile that is pressed between two cylinders that rotate at different angular velocities so that the shearing rate in the sand is higher than the critical one. It might then be possible to obtain wave-like phenomena!



(A scientific paper on the topic of granular flows that I found particularly clear is A new constitutive law for dense granular flows by Pierre Jop, Yoël Forterre & Olivier Pouliquen)





EDIT: I just noticed that Cort Ammon posted a link to this Liquid sand youtube video by Mark Robber, where a "fluidized bed" is created by letting air bubble through the sand from below. A fluidized bed is created when the drag of the air from below almost precisely counters the gravitational forces on the individual grains. The point is only indirectly about countering gravity. The main point is about getting the grains out of contact, so that they do not dissipate energy as quickly. As a result, less shearing is needed to sustain a fluid-like behavior, and that is also provided by the uneven air flow. Quite ingenious!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer! I was thinking that maybe hitting with enough energy would provoke long lived ripples but probably the roof given by the energy that would melt the sand is still a very short time interval. About granular flow, Navier Stokes means that it could exhibit turbolence and vorticity, or is there some reason to exclude those phenomena?
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @france95 Maybe in principle. But the problem is that since the viscosity is very high, it would be quite difficult to reach sufficient Reynolds numbers in the flow. (Intuitively, the "sand fluid" smoothes out most of the seeds of turbulence by dissipation.) It might be that by the time you are reaching the right Reynolds number, the heating of the sand is so large you are melting it as well :)
    $endgroup$
    – Void
    May 10 at 17:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think maybe the Casson or Bignham models might fit the behaviour, but you would have to make an experiment to make determine if that is true (I was thinking maybe a pipe filled with sand up to half, then a thin stripe of black sand as a marker and finally fill the rest with regular sand. Use a compressor on one end and the sand could flow in something similar to Poiseuille flow but since the stress is small in the middle, that part would flow like a solid block, and at the edges with higher shear rate you'd be able to fit for the right model).
    $endgroup$
    – S V
    May 10 at 18:42


















5












$begingroup$

Sand at rest really does not behave like a liquid, it behaves more like a solid. When you hit the surface of a flattened sand pile with a flat large object, there will only be a negligible wave in the grain density within the bulk of the pile. In fact, the dominant wave will be a complicated sound-wave within the grains, passed by interfaces between them, and this will be dissipated very quickly because of the imperfections.



But sand does start to behave a little bit like a very special liquid if it is in a special dynamical and dense enough regime which is called a granular flow (here you are correct that gravity typically helps maintain the higher density). The formal criterion is that it must exhibit a sufficiently large shear rate or gradient of average velocities. An example of this would be the moving parts of a pile of sand when it is being poured from a silo. Then, it is possible to write down an effective set of Navier-Stokes equations for its behavior in terms of densities, pressure, and bulk velocities, which are the same type of equations that govern the dynamics of water.



Beware, however, that even in this mode the behavior of the "sand liquids" is that of a highly Non-Newtonian fluid, putting it on par with the behavior of fluids such as thick slime, resin or ketchup. One particular feature includes the fact that the interaction between the layers of the sand of different velocities will depend in rather non-intuitive ways on the relative velocity of the layers. The dissipation in the grain flow is also very high and without external driving, it will quickly kill any shearing. And once the shearing rate drops below the critical level, the grain flow "freezes out" and suddenly behaves more like a solid again.



Finally, when the sand gets very thin and highly agitated (individual grains receive a lot of random kinetic energy), it may behave as a gas for a short time. The key criterion for this mode is that the grains do not collide too much between themselves and the walls (that dissipates a lot of the kinetic energy). This can be hard to sustain if the grains are heavy and when gravity is present. On the other hand, very light grains can really become a "minor gas-like component" of air for longer amounts of time since the air drag (collisions with air molecules) tends to synchronize the grain velocity with the bulk of the air.



As for your question with the "surface wave" on a pile of sand. This is really quite amusing, because I believe all three modes will typically be present. When you hit the surface of the sand with a small object, the sand will move at that point and create local shearing. Possibly, a part of the sand will eject in the air to be "gas-like" for a moment. However, the shearing in the sand that actually stays in the pile does allow for a fluid-type behaviour for a short moment, creating a wave-like ripple. Nevertheless, the relative velocities get quickly dissipated and the ripple freezes out.



So, ending with a tip for creating sand-liquid waves: try making one in a sand pile that is pressed between two cylinders that rotate at different angular velocities so that the shearing rate in the sand is higher than the critical one. It might then be possible to obtain wave-like phenomena!



(A scientific paper on the topic of granular flows that I found particularly clear is A new constitutive law for dense granular flows by Pierre Jop, Yoël Forterre & Olivier Pouliquen)





EDIT: I just noticed that Cort Ammon posted a link to this Liquid sand youtube video by Mark Robber, where a "fluidized bed" is created by letting air bubble through the sand from below. A fluidized bed is created when the drag of the air from below almost precisely counters the gravitational forces on the individual grains. The point is only indirectly about countering gravity. The main point is about getting the grains out of contact, so that they do not dissipate energy as quickly. As a result, less shearing is needed to sustain a fluid-like behavior, and that is also provided by the uneven air flow. Quite ingenious!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer! I was thinking that maybe hitting with enough energy would provoke long lived ripples but probably the roof given by the energy that would melt the sand is still a very short time interval. About granular flow, Navier Stokes means that it could exhibit turbolence and vorticity, or is there some reason to exclude those phenomena?
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @france95 Maybe in principle. But the problem is that since the viscosity is very high, it would be quite difficult to reach sufficient Reynolds numbers in the flow. (Intuitively, the "sand fluid" smoothes out most of the seeds of turbulence by dissipation.) It might be that by the time you are reaching the right Reynolds number, the heating of the sand is so large you are melting it as well :)
    $endgroup$
    – Void
    May 10 at 17:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think maybe the Casson or Bignham models might fit the behaviour, but you would have to make an experiment to make determine if that is true (I was thinking maybe a pipe filled with sand up to half, then a thin stripe of black sand as a marker and finally fill the rest with regular sand. Use a compressor on one end and the sand could flow in something similar to Poiseuille flow but since the stress is small in the middle, that part would flow like a solid block, and at the edges with higher shear rate you'd be able to fit for the right model).
    $endgroup$
    – S V
    May 10 at 18:42
















5












5








5





$begingroup$

Sand at rest really does not behave like a liquid, it behaves more like a solid. When you hit the surface of a flattened sand pile with a flat large object, there will only be a negligible wave in the grain density within the bulk of the pile. In fact, the dominant wave will be a complicated sound-wave within the grains, passed by interfaces between them, and this will be dissipated very quickly because of the imperfections.



But sand does start to behave a little bit like a very special liquid if it is in a special dynamical and dense enough regime which is called a granular flow (here you are correct that gravity typically helps maintain the higher density). The formal criterion is that it must exhibit a sufficiently large shear rate or gradient of average velocities. An example of this would be the moving parts of a pile of sand when it is being poured from a silo. Then, it is possible to write down an effective set of Navier-Stokes equations for its behavior in terms of densities, pressure, and bulk velocities, which are the same type of equations that govern the dynamics of water.



Beware, however, that even in this mode the behavior of the "sand liquids" is that of a highly Non-Newtonian fluid, putting it on par with the behavior of fluids such as thick slime, resin or ketchup. One particular feature includes the fact that the interaction between the layers of the sand of different velocities will depend in rather non-intuitive ways on the relative velocity of the layers. The dissipation in the grain flow is also very high and without external driving, it will quickly kill any shearing. And once the shearing rate drops below the critical level, the grain flow "freezes out" and suddenly behaves more like a solid again.



Finally, when the sand gets very thin and highly agitated (individual grains receive a lot of random kinetic energy), it may behave as a gas for a short time. The key criterion for this mode is that the grains do not collide too much between themselves and the walls (that dissipates a lot of the kinetic energy). This can be hard to sustain if the grains are heavy and when gravity is present. On the other hand, very light grains can really become a "minor gas-like component" of air for longer amounts of time since the air drag (collisions with air molecules) tends to synchronize the grain velocity with the bulk of the air.



As for your question with the "surface wave" on a pile of sand. This is really quite amusing, because I believe all three modes will typically be present. When you hit the surface of the sand with a small object, the sand will move at that point and create local shearing. Possibly, a part of the sand will eject in the air to be "gas-like" for a moment. However, the shearing in the sand that actually stays in the pile does allow for a fluid-type behaviour for a short moment, creating a wave-like ripple. Nevertheless, the relative velocities get quickly dissipated and the ripple freezes out.



So, ending with a tip for creating sand-liquid waves: try making one in a sand pile that is pressed between two cylinders that rotate at different angular velocities so that the shearing rate in the sand is higher than the critical one. It might then be possible to obtain wave-like phenomena!



(A scientific paper on the topic of granular flows that I found particularly clear is A new constitutive law for dense granular flows by Pierre Jop, Yoël Forterre & Olivier Pouliquen)





EDIT: I just noticed that Cort Ammon posted a link to this Liquid sand youtube video by Mark Robber, where a "fluidized bed" is created by letting air bubble through the sand from below. A fluidized bed is created when the drag of the air from below almost precisely counters the gravitational forces on the individual grains. The point is only indirectly about countering gravity. The main point is about getting the grains out of contact, so that they do not dissipate energy as quickly. As a result, less shearing is needed to sustain a fluid-like behavior, and that is also provided by the uneven air flow. Quite ingenious!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Sand at rest really does not behave like a liquid, it behaves more like a solid. When you hit the surface of a flattened sand pile with a flat large object, there will only be a negligible wave in the grain density within the bulk of the pile. In fact, the dominant wave will be a complicated sound-wave within the grains, passed by interfaces between them, and this will be dissipated very quickly because of the imperfections.



But sand does start to behave a little bit like a very special liquid if it is in a special dynamical and dense enough regime which is called a granular flow (here you are correct that gravity typically helps maintain the higher density). The formal criterion is that it must exhibit a sufficiently large shear rate or gradient of average velocities. An example of this would be the moving parts of a pile of sand when it is being poured from a silo. Then, it is possible to write down an effective set of Navier-Stokes equations for its behavior in terms of densities, pressure, and bulk velocities, which are the same type of equations that govern the dynamics of water.



Beware, however, that even in this mode the behavior of the "sand liquids" is that of a highly Non-Newtonian fluid, putting it on par with the behavior of fluids such as thick slime, resin or ketchup. One particular feature includes the fact that the interaction between the layers of the sand of different velocities will depend in rather non-intuitive ways on the relative velocity of the layers. The dissipation in the grain flow is also very high and without external driving, it will quickly kill any shearing. And once the shearing rate drops below the critical level, the grain flow "freezes out" and suddenly behaves more like a solid again.



Finally, when the sand gets very thin and highly agitated (individual grains receive a lot of random kinetic energy), it may behave as a gas for a short time. The key criterion for this mode is that the grains do not collide too much between themselves and the walls (that dissipates a lot of the kinetic energy). This can be hard to sustain if the grains are heavy and when gravity is present. On the other hand, very light grains can really become a "minor gas-like component" of air for longer amounts of time since the air drag (collisions with air molecules) tends to synchronize the grain velocity with the bulk of the air.



As for your question with the "surface wave" on a pile of sand. This is really quite amusing, because I believe all three modes will typically be present. When you hit the surface of the sand with a small object, the sand will move at that point and create local shearing. Possibly, a part of the sand will eject in the air to be "gas-like" for a moment. However, the shearing in the sand that actually stays in the pile does allow for a fluid-type behaviour for a short moment, creating a wave-like ripple. Nevertheless, the relative velocities get quickly dissipated and the ripple freezes out.



So, ending with a tip for creating sand-liquid waves: try making one in a sand pile that is pressed between two cylinders that rotate at different angular velocities so that the shearing rate in the sand is higher than the critical one. It might then be possible to obtain wave-like phenomena!



(A scientific paper on the topic of granular flows that I found particularly clear is A new constitutive law for dense granular flows by Pierre Jop, Yoël Forterre & Olivier Pouliquen)





EDIT: I just noticed that Cort Ammon posted a link to this Liquid sand youtube video by Mark Robber, where a "fluidized bed" is created by letting air bubble through the sand from below. A fluidized bed is created when the drag of the air from below almost precisely counters the gravitational forces on the individual grains. The point is only indirectly about countering gravity. The main point is about getting the grains out of contact, so that they do not dissipate energy as quickly. As a result, less shearing is needed to sustain a fluid-like behavior, and that is also provided by the uneven air flow. Quite ingenious!







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited May 10 at 17:49

























answered May 10 at 16:04









VoidVoid

11.4k12060




11.4k12060












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer! I was thinking that maybe hitting with enough energy would provoke long lived ripples but probably the roof given by the energy that would melt the sand is still a very short time interval. About granular flow, Navier Stokes means that it could exhibit turbolence and vorticity, or is there some reason to exclude those phenomena?
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @france95 Maybe in principle. But the problem is that since the viscosity is very high, it would be quite difficult to reach sufficient Reynolds numbers in the flow. (Intuitively, the "sand fluid" smoothes out most of the seeds of turbulence by dissipation.) It might be that by the time you are reaching the right Reynolds number, the heating of the sand is so large you are melting it as well :)
    $endgroup$
    – Void
    May 10 at 17:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think maybe the Casson or Bignham models might fit the behaviour, but you would have to make an experiment to make determine if that is true (I was thinking maybe a pipe filled with sand up to half, then a thin stripe of black sand as a marker and finally fill the rest with regular sand. Use a compressor on one end and the sand could flow in something similar to Poiseuille flow but since the stress is small in the middle, that part would flow like a solid block, and at the edges with higher shear rate you'd be able to fit for the right model).
    $endgroup$
    – S V
    May 10 at 18:42




















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer! I was thinking that maybe hitting with enough energy would provoke long lived ripples but probably the roof given by the energy that would melt the sand is still a very short time interval. About granular flow, Navier Stokes means that it could exhibit turbolence and vorticity, or is there some reason to exclude those phenomena?
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @france95 Maybe in principle. But the problem is that since the viscosity is very high, it would be quite difficult to reach sufficient Reynolds numbers in the flow. (Intuitively, the "sand fluid" smoothes out most of the seeds of turbulence by dissipation.) It might be that by the time you are reaching the right Reynolds number, the heating of the sand is so large you are melting it as well :)
    $endgroup$
    – Void
    May 10 at 17:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think maybe the Casson or Bignham models might fit the behaviour, but you would have to make an experiment to make determine if that is true (I was thinking maybe a pipe filled with sand up to half, then a thin stripe of black sand as a marker and finally fill the rest with regular sand. Use a compressor on one end and the sand could flow in something similar to Poiseuille flow but since the stress is small in the middle, that part would flow like a solid block, and at the edges with higher shear rate you'd be able to fit for the right model).
    $endgroup$
    – S V
    May 10 at 18:42


















$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the answer! I was thinking that maybe hitting with enough energy would provoke long lived ripples but probably the roof given by the energy that would melt the sand is still a very short time interval. About granular flow, Navier Stokes means that it could exhibit turbolence and vorticity, or is there some reason to exclude those phenomena?
$endgroup$
– france95
May 10 at 17:46




$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the answer! I was thinking that maybe hitting with enough energy would provoke long lived ripples but probably the roof given by the energy that would melt the sand is still a very short time interval. About granular flow, Navier Stokes means that it could exhibit turbolence and vorticity, or is there some reason to exclude those phenomena?
$endgroup$
– france95
May 10 at 17:46




1




1




$begingroup$
@france95 Maybe in principle. But the problem is that since the viscosity is very high, it would be quite difficult to reach sufficient Reynolds numbers in the flow. (Intuitively, the "sand fluid" smoothes out most of the seeds of turbulence by dissipation.) It might be that by the time you are reaching the right Reynolds number, the heating of the sand is so large you are melting it as well :)
$endgroup$
– Void
May 10 at 17:54




$begingroup$
@france95 Maybe in principle. But the problem is that since the viscosity is very high, it would be quite difficult to reach sufficient Reynolds numbers in the flow. (Intuitively, the "sand fluid" smoothes out most of the seeds of turbulence by dissipation.) It might be that by the time you are reaching the right Reynolds number, the heating of the sand is so large you are melting it as well :)
$endgroup$
– Void
May 10 at 17:54




1




1




$begingroup$
I think maybe the Casson or Bignham models might fit the behaviour, but you would have to make an experiment to make determine if that is true (I was thinking maybe a pipe filled with sand up to half, then a thin stripe of black sand as a marker and finally fill the rest with regular sand. Use a compressor on one end and the sand could flow in something similar to Poiseuille flow but since the stress is small in the middle, that part would flow like a solid block, and at the edges with higher shear rate you'd be able to fit for the right model).
$endgroup$
– S V
May 10 at 18:42






$begingroup$
I think maybe the Casson or Bignham models might fit the behaviour, but you would have to make an experiment to make determine if that is true (I was thinking maybe a pipe filled with sand up to half, then a thin stripe of black sand as a marker and finally fill the rest with regular sand. Use a compressor on one end and the sand could flow in something similar to Poiseuille flow but since the stress is small in the middle, that part would flow like a solid block, and at the edges with higher shear rate you'd be able to fit for the right model).
$endgroup$
– S V
May 10 at 18:42




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479163%2fwhat-kind-of-fluid-is-sand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029