International Code of Ethics for order of co-authors in research papers












6















In many cases it so happens that multiple workers are involved in a research problem under the supervision of group leader. We will assume that group leader is the corresponding author of a manuscript. Now, I have the following queries:




  1. Who will decide who the first author will be? I am talking about a scenario when all the co-authors are PhD holders. If there is a dispute, who has to resolve and how?


  2. Who decides the sequence of co-authors in the manuscript, first author or corresponding author? Is there any international code of ethics in this regard?


  3. Again, we have to assume that it is practically impossible to quantify the contributions of respective co-authors in a well-funded, well-qualified research group. And qualification sometimes comes along with ego. How can the corresponding author decide that the second co-author has contributed more than the third co-author, and the ordering will not change (whosoever had decided based on point 2)?











share|improve this question


















  • 5





    Welcome tot the Academia Stack Exchange You should note that in many fields & locations the basic assumptions you've made here aren't often true. For example it's fairly common for the corresponding author to be the person who writes the actual words, or the member of staff closest to that.

    – origimbo
    May 10 at 13:41













  • Welcome. Mentioning your research field would help a lot, as the order of authors varies.

    – Tommi Brander
    May 10 at 14:37
















6















In many cases it so happens that multiple workers are involved in a research problem under the supervision of group leader. We will assume that group leader is the corresponding author of a manuscript. Now, I have the following queries:




  1. Who will decide who the first author will be? I am talking about a scenario when all the co-authors are PhD holders. If there is a dispute, who has to resolve and how?


  2. Who decides the sequence of co-authors in the manuscript, first author or corresponding author? Is there any international code of ethics in this regard?


  3. Again, we have to assume that it is practically impossible to quantify the contributions of respective co-authors in a well-funded, well-qualified research group. And qualification sometimes comes along with ego. How can the corresponding author decide that the second co-author has contributed more than the third co-author, and the ordering will not change (whosoever had decided based on point 2)?











share|improve this question


















  • 5





    Welcome tot the Academia Stack Exchange You should note that in many fields & locations the basic assumptions you've made here aren't often true. For example it's fairly common for the corresponding author to be the person who writes the actual words, or the member of staff closest to that.

    – origimbo
    May 10 at 13:41













  • Welcome. Mentioning your research field would help a lot, as the order of authors varies.

    – Tommi Brander
    May 10 at 14:37














6












6








6








In many cases it so happens that multiple workers are involved in a research problem under the supervision of group leader. We will assume that group leader is the corresponding author of a manuscript. Now, I have the following queries:




  1. Who will decide who the first author will be? I am talking about a scenario when all the co-authors are PhD holders. If there is a dispute, who has to resolve and how?


  2. Who decides the sequence of co-authors in the manuscript, first author or corresponding author? Is there any international code of ethics in this regard?


  3. Again, we have to assume that it is practically impossible to quantify the contributions of respective co-authors in a well-funded, well-qualified research group. And qualification sometimes comes along with ego. How can the corresponding author decide that the second co-author has contributed more than the third co-author, and the ordering will not change (whosoever had decided based on point 2)?











share|improve this question














In many cases it so happens that multiple workers are involved in a research problem under the supervision of group leader. We will assume that group leader is the corresponding author of a manuscript. Now, I have the following queries:




  1. Who will decide who the first author will be? I am talking about a scenario when all the co-authors are PhD holders. If there is a dispute, who has to resolve and how?


  2. Who decides the sequence of co-authors in the manuscript, first author or corresponding author? Is there any international code of ethics in this regard?


  3. Again, we have to assume that it is practically impossible to quantify the contributions of respective co-authors in a well-funded, well-qualified research group. And qualification sometimes comes along with ego. How can the corresponding author decide that the second co-author has contributed more than the third co-author, and the ordering will not change (whosoever had decided based on point 2)?








authorship author-order






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 10 at 13:33









Suddhasattwa Ghosh Suddhasattwa Ghosh

411




411








  • 5





    Welcome tot the Academia Stack Exchange You should note that in many fields & locations the basic assumptions you've made here aren't often true. For example it's fairly common for the corresponding author to be the person who writes the actual words, or the member of staff closest to that.

    – origimbo
    May 10 at 13:41













  • Welcome. Mentioning your research field would help a lot, as the order of authors varies.

    – Tommi Brander
    May 10 at 14:37














  • 5





    Welcome tot the Academia Stack Exchange You should note that in many fields & locations the basic assumptions you've made here aren't often true. For example it's fairly common for the corresponding author to be the person who writes the actual words, or the member of staff closest to that.

    – origimbo
    May 10 at 13:41













  • Welcome. Mentioning your research field would help a lot, as the order of authors varies.

    – Tommi Brander
    May 10 at 14:37








5




5





Welcome tot the Academia Stack Exchange You should note that in many fields & locations the basic assumptions you've made here aren't often true. For example it's fairly common for the corresponding author to be the person who writes the actual words, or the member of staff closest to that.

– origimbo
May 10 at 13:41







Welcome tot the Academia Stack Exchange You should note that in many fields & locations the basic assumptions you've made here aren't often true. For example it's fairly common for the corresponding author to be the person who writes the actual words, or the member of staff closest to that.

– origimbo
May 10 at 13:41















Welcome. Mentioning your research field would help a lot, as the order of authors varies.

– Tommi Brander
May 10 at 14:37





Welcome. Mentioning your research field would help a lot, as the order of authors varies.

– Tommi Brander
May 10 at 14:37










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















12














The meaning of author order varies across fields. In some fields, authors are listed alphabetically. In others, the order reflects some sort of perceived contribution. Some people prefer to be the last author.



The only unified code, and it is unwritten at that, regarding author order, is to talk to your authors and be considerate to their feelings. It is academic misconduct to leave someone out as an author. Similarly, it is wrong to list someone who should not be an author. This means that it is up to everyone to decide. If your research group is so disfunctional that this is hard, have those conversations at the start. In fact, I advise everyone to have those conversations at the start and during the process just to keep hard feelings from developing.






share|improve this answer































    9














    As far as I know, the only "international code of ethics" in this regard is that all authors must agree on the author ordering, or the paper cannot be published.




    Who will decide who the first author will be? I am talking about a scenario when all the co-authors are PhD holders. If there is a dispute, who has to resolve and how?




    If there is a dispute, they have to negotiate until they find an ordering that everyone agrees with. Nobody has the right to put your name in a certain position without the consent of you and all the other authors. (It is irrelevant here who holds a PhD or not; the authors have the same rights no matter what kind of degrees they have or don't have.)



    If the authors can't reach agreement, they can't publish the paper. A subset of the authors could decide instead to publish a new paper with the remaining authors' contributions removed or recreated from scratch.



    Of course, the authors could agree that they are going to let a certain person decide (the corresponding author or whoever), and that they will follow that person's decision.



    Commonly, the journal will require every author to sign a statement (or click a check box) that they approve all aspects of the submitted paper, including the author ordering. So if anyone disagrees with the ordering, they withhold consent and the paper doesn't proceed until agreement is reached. Or, in some cases, the corresponding author is asked to certify that all authors consent. It would be extremely unethical for them to certify this if the authors do not all agree to the author ordering.




    Who decides the sequence of co-authors in the manuscript, first author or corresponding author? Is there any international code of ethics in this regard?




    Same answer.




    Again, we have to assume that it is practically impossible to quantify the contributions of respective co-authors in a well-funded, well-qualified research group. And qualification sometimes comes along with ego. How can the corresponding author decide that the second co-author has contributed more than the third co-author, and the ordering will not change (whosoever had decided based on point 2)?




    As above, the corresponding author can't make any such decision unilaterally.






    share|improve this answer
























    • "As far as I know, the only "international code of ethics" in this regard is that all authors must agree on the author ordering, or the paper cannot be published." I'm guessing that holding a paper ransom to improve your name's position on the authors list is what would be best described as a "career limiting move", right? ;)

      – nick012000
      May 11 at 6:40



















    1














    Since you don't specify the field, I'm not sure how helpful this will be to you, but recently there has been a movement in economics to encourage the publication of papers under a system of certified random author ordering. You can read more about this trend at https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/policies/random-author-order.






    share|improve this answer
























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "415"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f130385%2finternational-code-of-ethics-for-order-of-co-authors-in-research-papers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      12














      The meaning of author order varies across fields. In some fields, authors are listed alphabetically. In others, the order reflects some sort of perceived contribution. Some people prefer to be the last author.



      The only unified code, and it is unwritten at that, regarding author order, is to talk to your authors and be considerate to their feelings. It is academic misconduct to leave someone out as an author. Similarly, it is wrong to list someone who should not be an author. This means that it is up to everyone to decide. If your research group is so disfunctional that this is hard, have those conversations at the start. In fact, I advise everyone to have those conversations at the start and during the process just to keep hard feelings from developing.






      share|improve this answer




























        12














        The meaning of author order varies across fields. In some fields, authors are listed alphabetically. In others, the order reflects some sort of perceived contribution. Some people prefer to be the last author.



        The only unified code, and it is unwritten at that, regarding author order, is to talk to your authors and be considerate to their feelings. It is academic misconduct to leave someone out as an author. Similarly, it is wrong to list someone who should not be an author. This means that it is up to everyone to decide. If your research group is so disfunctional that this is hard, have those conversations at the start. In fact, I advise everyone to have those conversations at the start and during the process just to keep hard feelings from developing.






        share|improve this answer


























          12












          12








          12







          The meaning of author order varies across fields. In some fields, authors are listed alphabetically. In others, the order reflects some sort of perceived contribution. Some people prefer to be the last author.



          The only unified code, and it is unwritten at that, regarding author order, is to talk to your authors and be considerate to their feelings. It is academic misconduct to leave someone out as an author. Similarly, it is wrong to list someone who should not be an author. This means that it is up to everyone to decide. If your research group is so disfunctional that this is hard, have those conversations at the start. In fact, I advise everyone to have those conversations at the start and during the process just to keep hard feelings from developing.






          share|improve this answer













          The meaning of author order varies across fields. In some fields, authors are listed alphabetically. In others, the order reflects some sort of perceived contribution. Some people prefer to be the last author.



          The only unified code, and it is unwritten at that, regarding author order, is to talk to your authors and be considerate to their feelings. It is academic misconduct to leave someone out as an author. Similarly, it is wrong to list someone who should not be an author. This means that it is up to everyone to decide. If your research group is so disfunctional that this is hard, have those conversations at the start. In fact, I advise everyone to have those conversations at the start and during the process just to keep hard feelings from developing.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered May 10 at 14:04









          StrongBadStrongBad

          88.5k24220434




          88.5k24220434























              9














              As far as I know, the only "international code of ethics" in this regard is that all authors must agree on the author ordering, or the paper cannot be published.




              Who will decide who the first author will be? I am talking about a scenario when all the co-authors are PhD holders. If there is a dispute, who has to resolve and how?




              If there is a dispute, they have to negotiate until they find an ordering that everyone agrees with. Nobody has the right to put your name in a certain position without the consent of you and all the other authors. (It is irrelevant here who holds a PhD or not; the authors have the same rights no matter what kind of degrees they have or don't have.)



              If the authors can't reach agreement, they can't publish the paper. A subset of the authors could decide instead to publish a new paper with the remaining authors' contributions removed or recreated from scratch.



              Of course, the authors could agree that they are going to let a certain person decide (the corresponding author or whoever), and that they will follow that person's decision.



              Commonly, the journal will require every author to sign a statement (or click a check box) that they approve all aspects of the submitted paper, including the author ordering. So if anyone disagrees with the ordering, they withhold consent and the paper doesn't proceed until agreement is reached. Or, in some cases, the corresponding author is asked to certify that all authors consent. It would be extremely unethical for them to certify this if the authors do not all agree to the author ordering.




              Who decides the sequence of co-authors in the manuscript, first author or corresponding author? Is there any international code of ethics in this regard?




              Same answer.




              Again, we have to assume that it is practically impossible to quantify the contributions of respective co-authors in a well-funded, well-qualified research group. And qualification sometimes comes along with ego. How can the corresponding author decide that the second co-author has contributed more than the third co-author, and the ordering will not change (whosoever had decided based on point 2)?




              As above, the corresponding author can't make any such decision unilaterally.






              share|improve this answer
























              • "As far as I know, the only "international code of ethics" in this regard is that all authors must agree on the author ordering, or the paper cannot be published." I'm guessing that holding a paper ransom to improve your name's position on the authors list is what would be best described as a "career limiting move", right? ;)

                – nick012000
                May 11 at 6:40
















              9














              As far as I know, the only "international code of ethics" in this regard is that all authors must agree on the author ordering, or the paper cannot be published.




              Who will decide who the first author will be? I am talking about a scenario when all the co-authors are PhD holders. If there is a dispute, who has to resolve and how?




              If there is a dispute, they have to negotiate until they find an ordering that everyone agrees with. Nobody has the right to put your name in a certain position without the consent of you and all the other authors. (It is irrelevant here who holds a PhD or not; the authors have the same rights no matter what kind of degrees they have or don't have.)



              If the authors can't reach agreement, they can't publish the paper. A subset of the authors could decide instead to publish a new paper with the remaining authors' contributions removed or recreated from scratch.



              Of course, the authors could agree that they are going to let a certain person decide (the corresponding author or whoever), and that they will follow that person's decision.



              Commonly, the journal will require every author to sign a statement (or click a check box) that they approve all aspects of the submitted paper, including the author ordering. So if anyone disagrees with the ordering, they withhold consent and the paper doesn't proceed until agreement is reached. Or, in some cases, the corresponding author is asked to certify that all authors consent. It would be extremely unethical for them to certify this if the authors do not all agree to the author ordering.




              Who decides the sequence of co-authors in the manuscript, first author or corresponding author? Is there any international code of ethics in this regard?




              Same answer.




              Again, we have to assume that it is practically impossible to quantify the contributions of respective co-authors in a well-funded, well-qualified research group. And qualification sometimes comes along with ego. How can the corresponding author decide that the second co-author has contributed more than the third co-author, and the ordering will not change (whosoever had decided based on point 2)?




              As above, the corresponding author can't make any such decision unilaterally.






              share|improve this answer
























              • "As far as I know, the only "international code of ethics" in this regard is that all authors must agree on the author ordering, or the paper cannot be published." I'm guessing that holding a paper ransom to improve your name's position on the authors list is what would be best described as a "career limiting move", right? ;)

                – nick012000
                May 11 at 6:40














              9












              9








              9







              As far as I know, the only "international code of ethics" in this regard is that all authors must agree on the author ordering, or the paper cannot be published.




              Who will decide who the first author will be? I am talking about a scenario when all the co-authors are PhD holders. If there is a dispute, who has to resolve and how?




              If there is a dispute, they have to negotiate until they find an ordering that everyone agrees with. Nobody has the right to put your name in a certain position without the consent of you and all the other authors. (It is irrelevant here who holds a PhD or not; the authors have the same rights no matter what kind of degrees they have or don't have.)



              If the authors can't reach agreement, they can't publish the paper. A subset of the authors could decide instead to publish a new paper with the remaining authors' contributions removed or recreated from scratch.



              Of course, the authors could agree that they are going to let a certain person decide (the corresponding author or whoever), and that they will follow that person's decision.



              Commonly, the journal will require every author to sign a statement (or click a check box) that they approve all aspects of the submitted paper, including the author ordering. So if anyone disagrees with the ordering, they withhold consent and the paper doesn't proceed until agreement is reached. Or, in some cases, the corresponding author is asked to certify that all authors consent. It would be extremely unethical for them to certify this if the authors do not all agree to the author ordering.




              Who decides the sequence of co-authors in the manuscript, first author or corresponding author? Is there any international code of ethics in this regard?




              Same answer.




              Again, we have to assume that it is practically impossible to quantify the contributions of respective co-authors in a well-funded, well-qualified research group. And qualification sometimes comes along with ego. How can the corresponding author decide that the second co-author has contributed more than the third co-author, and the ordering will not change (whosoever had decided based on point 2)?




              As above, the corresponding author can't make any such decision unilaterally.






              share|improve this answer













              As far as I know, the only "international code of ethics" in this regard is that all authors must agree on the author ordering, or the paper cannot be published.




              Who will decide who the first author will be? I am talking about a scenario when all the co-authors are PhD holders. If there is a dispute, who has to resolve and how?




              If there is a dispute, they have to negotiate until they find an ordering that everyone agrees with. Nobody has the right to put your name in a certain position without the consent of you and all the other authors. (It is irrelevant here who holds a PhD or not; the authors have the same rights no matter what kind of degrees they have or don't have.)



              If the authors can't reach agreement, they can't publish the paper. A subset of the authors could decide instead to publish a new paper with the remaining authors' contributions removed or recreated from scratch.



              Of course, the authors could agree that they are going to let a certain person decide (the corresponding author or whoever), and that they will follow that person's decision.



              Commonly, the journal will require every author to sign a statement (or click a check box) that they approve all aspects of the submitted paper, including the author ordering. So if anyone disagrees with the ordering, they withhold consent and the paper doesn't proceed until agreement is reached. Or, in some cases, the corresponding author is asked to certify that all authors consent. It would be extremely unethical for them to certify this if the authors do not all agree to the author ordering.




              Who decides the sequence of co-authors in the manuscript, first author or corresponding author? Is there any international code of ethics in this regard?




              Same answer.




              Again, we have to assume that it is practically impossible to quantify the contributions of respective co-authors in a well-funded, well-qualified research group. And qualification sometimes comes along with ego. How can the corresponding author decide that the second co-author has contributed more than the third co-author, and the ordering will not change (whosoever had decided based on point 2)?




              As above, the corresponding author can't make any such decision unilaterally.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered May 10 at 14:05









              Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge

              110k36320420




              110k36320420













              • "As far as I know, the only "international code of ethics" in this regard is that all authors must agree on the author ordering, or the paper cannot be published." I'm guessing that holding a paper ransom to improve your name's position on the authors list is what would be best described as a "career limiting move", right? ;)

                – nick012000
                May 11 at 6:40



















              • "As far as I know, the only "international code of ethics" in this regard is that all authors must agree on the author ordering, or the paper cannot be published." I'm guessing that holding a paper ransom to improve your name's position on the authors list is what would be best described as a "career limiting move", right? ;)

                – nick012000
                May 11 at 6:40

















              "As far as I know, the only "international code of ethics" in this regard is that all authors must agree on the author ordering, or the paper cannot be published." I'm guessing that holding a paper ransom to improve your name's position on the authors list is what would be best described as a "career limiting move", right? ;)

              – nick012000
              May 11 at 6:40





              "As far as I know, the only "international code of ethics" in this regard is that all authors must agree on the author ordering, or the paper cannot be published." I'm guessing that holding a paper ransom to improve your name's position on the authors list is what would be best described as a "career limiting move", right? ;)

              – nick012000
              May 11 at 6:40











              1














              Since you don't specify the field, I'm not sure how helpful this will be to you, but recently there has been a movement in economics to encourage the publication of papers under a system of certified random author ordering. You can read more about this trend at https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/policies/random-author-order.






              share|improve this answer




























                1














                Since you don't specify the field, I'm not sure how helpful this will be to you, but recently there has been a movement in economics to encourage the publication of papers under a system of certified random author ordering. You can read more about this trend at https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/policies/random-author-order.






                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  Since you don't specify the field, I'm not sure how helpful this will be to you, but recently there has been a movement in economics to encourage the publication of papers under a system of certified random author ordering. You can read more about this trend at https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/policies/random-author-order.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Since you don't specify the field, I'm not sure how helpful this will be to you, but recently there has been a movement in economics to encourage the publication of papers under a system of certified random author ordering. You can read more about this trend at https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/policies/random-author-order.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered May 10 at 16:37









                  ClarissaClarissa

                  314




                  314






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f130385%2finternational-code-of-ethics-for-order-of-co-authors-in-research-papers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                      He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                      Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029