“Every hiker climbed a hill”, is there one or multiple hills? [closed]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







15















This question comes from a quiz but I could not find the correct answer.



Hikers climbing a hill










share|improve this question













closed as off-topic by WS2, lbf, GEdgar, Dancrumb, JJJ May 13 at 23:44



  • This question does not appear to be about English language and usage within the scope defined in the help center.

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 2





    Perhaps try ell.stackexchange.com instead of here.

    – GEdgar
    May 13 at 10:24






  • 42





    Both are correct. Least correct is the test that contained this.

    – Hot Licks
    May 13 at 12:00






  • 2





    @HotLicks Afaik that test was designed to identify your dialect and country of origin. They basically ask what feels more correct to you, not what is grammatically correct.

    – kapex
    May 13 at 12:44






  • 3





    @GEdgar Perhaps explain to them why they should do that?

    – Spagirl
    May 13 at 13:09






  • 1





    Every hiker [in the group] climbed a hill. [general activity] versus Every hiker climbed the hill. [the one in question]. If every hiker climbed a hill, then, all the hikers also climbed a hill.

    – Lambie
    May 13 at 18:49


















15















This question comes from a quiz but I could not find the correct answer.



Hikers climbing a hill










share|improve this question













closed as off-topic by WS2, lbf, GEdgar, Dancrumb, JJJ May 13 at 23:44



  • This question does not appear to be about English language and usage within the scope defined in the help center.

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 2





    Perhaps try ell.stackexchange.com instead of here.

    – GEdgar
    May 13 at 10:24






  • 42





    Both are correct. Least correct is the test that contained this.

    – Hot Licks
    May 13 at 12:00






  • 2





    @HotLicks Afaik that test was designed to identify your dialect and country of origin. They basically ask what feels more correct to you, not what is grammatically correct.

    – kapex
    May 13 at 12:44






  • 3





    @GEdgar Perhaps explain to them why they should do that?

    – Spagirl
    May 13 at 13:09






  • 1





    Every hiker [in the group] climbed a hill. [general activity] versus Every hiker climbed the hill. [the one in question]. If every hiker climbed a hill, then, all the hikers also climbed a hill.

    – Lambie
    May 13 at 18:49














15












15








15


2






This question comes from a quiz but I could not find the correct answer.



Hikers climbing a hill










share|improve this question














This question comes from a quiz but I could not find the correct answer.



Hikers climbing a hill







grammar






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 13 at 8:29









myname80myname80

8513




8513




closed as off-topic by WS2, lbf, GEdgar, Dancrumb, JJJ May 13 at 23:44



  • This question does not appear to be about English language and usage within the scope defined in the help center.

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by WS2, lbf, GEdgar, Dancrumb, JJJ May 13 at 23:44



  • This question does not appear to be about English language and usage within the scope defined in the help center.

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 2





    Perhaps try ell.stackexchange.com instead of here.

    – GEdgar
    May 13 at 10:24






  • 42





    Both are correct. Least correct is the test that contained this.

    – Hot Licks
    May 13 at 12:00






  • 2





    @HotLicks Afaik that test was designed to identify your dialect and country of origin. They basically ask what feels more correct to you, not what is grammatically correct.

    – kapex
    May 13 at 12:44






  • 3





    @GEdgar Perhaps explain to them why they should do that?

    – Spagirl
    May 13 at 13:09






  • 1





    Every hiker [in the group] climbed a hill. [general activity] versus Every hiker climbed the hill. [the one in question]. If every hiker climbed a hill, then, all the hikers also climbed a hill.

    – Lambie
    May 13 at 18:49














  • 2





    Perhaps try ell.stackexchange.com instead of here.

    – GEdgar
    May 13 at 10:24






  • 42





    Both are correct. Least correct is the test that contained this.

    – Hot Licks
    May 13 at 12:00






  • 2





    @HotLicks Afaik that test was designed to identify your dialect and country of origin. They basically ask what feels more correct to you, not what is grammatically correct.

    – kapex
    May 13 at 12:44






  • 3





    @GEdgar Perhaps explain to them why they should do that?

    – Spagirl
    May 13 at 13:09






  • 1





    Every hiker [in the group] climbed a hill. [general activity] versus Every hiker climbed the hill. [the one in question]. If every hiker climbed a hill, then, all the hikers also climbed a hill.

    – Lambie
    May 13 at 18:49








2




2





Perhaps try ell.stackexchange.com instead of here.

– GEdgar
May 13 at 10:24





Perhaps try ell.stackexchange.com instead of here.

– GEdgar
May 13 at 10:24




42




42





Both are correct. Least correct is the test that contained this.

– Hot Licks
May 13 at 12:00





Both are correct. Least correct is the test that contained this.

– Hot Licks
May 13 at 12:00




2




2





@HotLicks Afaik that test was designed to identify your dialect and country of origin. They basically ask what feels more correct to you, not what is grammatically correct.

– kapex
May 13 at 12:44





@HotLicks Afaik that test was designed to identify your dialect and country of origin. They basically ask what feels more correct to you, not what is grammatically correct.

– kapex
May 13 at 12:44




3




3





@GEdgar Perhaps explain to them why they should do that?

– Spagirl
May 13 at 13:09





@GEdgar Perhaps explain to them why they should do that?

– Spagirl
May 13 at 13:09




1




1





Every hiker [in the group] climbed a hill. [general activity] versus Every hiker climbed the hill. [the one in question]. If every hiker climbed a hill, then, all the hikers also climbed a hill.

– Lambie
May 13 at 18:49





Every hiker [in the group] climbed a hill. [general activity] versus Every hiker climbed the hill. [the one in question]. If every hiker climbed a hill, then, all the hikers also climbed a hill.

– Lambie
May 13 at 18:49










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















36














This image comes from a Quiz "Which English?" which people were invited to take as part of a study into language acquisition. While the Quiz purports to be able to identify which local variant of English you speak from your answers, it actually serves dual purpose and forms part of a study into how language acquisition varies with age.



According to the supplementary materials (see p.58) of the paper for which the Quiz was conducted, the correct answer varies by English region so there is no universally correct answer to this question.






share|improve this answer































    14














    There is no way to know. As mentioned in a comment, using the indefinite article "a" does not mean that the hikers could not have climbed the same hill.



    "There was an event at the park. Each participant crossed a stream, climbed a hill, and rode a bike 5 kilometers."



    There is only one stream and one hill in the park. And of course, there was more than one bike -- each person had his own bike, because, really, what else would make sense? Sometimes, context is all, and language is not math. The sentence is grammatically and factually correct. However, it's possible that there was one bike and they took turns riding it. That would be something that a scientific paper, legal brief, or other technical documentation would have to clarify. In creative writing, that kind of precision can kill the flow and tone.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      Excellent example, showing that both interpretations are plausible.

      – Rosie F
      May 13 at 13:21






    • 1





      I'd argue that "Each participant crossed the stream, climbed the hill, and rode a bike" is more informative and is preferable to using the indefinite article. I don't see any reason to be ambiguous about it if everyone is indeed crossing the same stream and climbing the same hill. It's not wrong, but good writing shouldn't leave the door open for misinterpretation.

      – Nuclear Wang
      May 13 at 14:08






    • 1





      More amusing interpretation: Each participant was on the same bike at the same time.

      – Zack
      May 13 at 14:30











    • @Zack Not unlikely if it was an event for clowns or acrobats.

      – Barmar
      May 13 at 18:07











    • @NuclearWang: I'd consider *"the hill" to be wrong in this context, unless the park has only one hill (or there's some other way for the listener to tell which hill is meant).

      – ruakh
      May 13 at 21:38



















    13














    The indefinite determiner "a" represents all things in a given category rather than the more specific definite determiner "the". So, if you were to ask me, "Every Hiker climbed a hill" represents a specific group of hikers who climbed non-specific hills and not the same hill. If the sentence said, If every hiker had climbed the hill, it would be only one hill.






    share|improve this answer
























    • Does the use of "a" preclude the possibility of every hiker climbing the same hill? It seems a bit pedantic but the statement would still be true if every hiker climbed the same hill.

      – Areeb
      May 13 at 11:20






    • 12





      @Areeb No, it doesn't exclude the possibility that there was only one hill. It also doesn't exclude the possibility that there were no hikers at all!

      – alephzero
      May 13 at 11:29











    • @Areeb It's true that "a" can be used to refer to the same non-specific hill, but then I would personally use "every hiker climbed some hill" to convey that "[they all climbed the same hill, but I don't know which one]". This is something that would hopefully become more clear in full context.

      – Sam
      May 13 at 13:57











    • Re: ambiguity: Imo, that's why the question ask about "most correct"

      – Jeffrey
      May 13 at 15:10






    • 1





      @Sam. I think "every hiker climbed some hill" makes it even less likely to mean they all climbed the same hill than "every hiker climbed a hill" does.

      – Monty Harder
      May 13 at 15:51



















    3














    This seems quite clear to me. In the first picture, every climber climbed a hill; in the second picture, every climber climbed the hill. It is easy to construct counter-examples where the second picture is described as "every climber climbed a hill", but the default meaning is represented in the first picture. This is why the question is "Which image is most correct?"






    share|improve this answer
























    • If a particular hill was not previously established, then the correct sentence for the second picture would be "There was a hill that every hiker climbed."

      – Acccumulation
      May 13 at 15:56



















    1














    In my native dialect (General American), it’s ambiguous, but I’d assume it probably meant multiple hills. “Each hiker climbed a hill,” makes that presumption even stronger. “Every hiker climbed the [same] hill,” and “Every hiker climbed his [own] hill,” are both unambiguous.






    share|improve this answer






























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      36














      This image comes from a Quiz "Which English?" which people were invited to take as part of a study into language acquisition. While the Quiz purports to be able to identify which local variant of English you speak from your answers, it actually serves dual purpose and forms part of a study into how language acquisition varies with age.



      According to the supplementary materials (see p.58) of the paper for which the Quiz was conducted, the correct answer varies by English region so there is no universally correct answer to this question.






      share|improve this answer




























        36














        This image comes from a Quiz "Which English?" which people were invited to take as part of a study into language acquisition. While the Quiz purports to be able to identify which local variant of English you speak from your answers, it actually serves dual purpose and forms part of a study into how language acquisition varies with age.



        According to the supplementary materials (see p.58) of the paper for which the Quiz was conducted, the correct answer varies by English region so there is no universally correct answer to this question.






        share|improve this answer


























          36












          36








          36







          This image comes from a Quiz "Which English?" which people were invited to take as part of a study into language acquisition. While the Quiz purports to be able to identify which local variant of English you speak from your answers, it actually serves dual purpose and forms part of a study into how language acquisition varies with age.



          According to the supplementary materials (see p.58) of the paper for which the Quiz was conducted, the correct answer varies by English region so there is no universally correct answer to this question.






          share|improve this answer













          This image comes from a Quiz "Which English?" which people were invited to take as part of a study into language acquisition. While the Quiz purports to be able to identify which local variant of English you speak from your answers, it actually serves dual purpose and forms part of a study into how language acquisition varies with age.



          According to the supplementary materials (see p.58) of the paper for which the Quiz was conducted, the correct answer varies by English region so there is no universally correct answer to this question.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered May 13 at 13:55









          Jack AidleyJack Aidley

          1,416813




          1,416813

























              14














              There is no way to know. As mentioned in a comment, using the indefinite article "a" does not mean that the hikers could not have climbed the same hill.



              "There was an event at the park. Each participant crossed a stream, climbed a hill, and rode a bike 5 kilometers."



              There is only one stream and one hill in the park. And of course, there was more than one bike -- each person had his own bike, because, really, what else would make sense? Sometimes, context is all, and language is not math. The sentence is grammatically and factually correct. However, it's possible that there was one bike and they took turns riding it. That would be something that a scientific paper, legal brief, or other technical documentation would have to clarify. In creative writing, that kind of precision can kill the flow and tone.






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                Excellent example, showing that both interpretations are plausible.

                – Rosie F
                May 13 at 13:21






              • 1





                I'd argue that "Each participant crossed the stream, climbed the hill, and rode a bike" is more informative and is preferable to using the indefinite article. I don't see any reason to be ambiguous about it if everyone is indeed crossing the same stream and climbing the same hill. It's not wrong, but good writing shouldn't leave the door open for misinterpretation.

                – Nuclear Wang
                May 13 at 14:08






              • 1





                More amusing interpretation: Each participant was on the same bike at the same time.

                – Zack
                May 13 at 14:30











              • @Zack Not unlikely if it was an event for clowns or acrobats.

                – Barmar
                May 13 at 18:07











              • @NuclearWang: I'd consider *"the hill" to be wrong in this context, unless the park has only one hill (or there's some other way for the listener to tell which hill is meant).

                – ruakh
                May 13 at 21:38
















              14














              There is no way to know. As mentioned in a comment, using the indefinite article "a" does not mean that the hikers could not have climbed the same hill.



              "There was an event at the park. Each participant crossed a stream, climbed a hill, and rode a bike 5 kilometers."



              There is only one stream and one hill in the park. And of course, there was more than one bike -- each person had his own bike, because, really, what else would make sense? Sometimes, context is all, and language is not math. The sentence is grammatically and factually correct. However, it's possible that there was one bike and they took turns riding it. That would be something that a scientific paper, legal brief, or other technical documentation would have to clarify. In creative writing, that kind of precision can kill the flow and tone.






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1





                Excellent example, showing that both interpretations are plausible.

                – Rosie F
                May 13 at 13:21






              • 1





                I'd argue that "Each participant crossed the stream, climbed the hill, and rode a bike" is more informative and is preferable to using the indefinite article. I don't see any reason to be ambiguous about it if everyone is indeed crossing the same stream and climbing the same hill. It's not wrong, but good writing shouldn't leave the door open for misinterpretation.

                – Nuclear Wang
                May 13 at 14:08






              • 1





                More amusing interpretation: Each participant was on the same bike at the same time.

                – Zack
                May 13 at 14:30











              • @Zack Not unlikely if it was an event for clowns or acrobats.

                – Barmar
                May 13 at 18:07











              • @NuclearWang: I'd consider *"the hill" to be wrong in this context, unless the park has only one hill (or there's some other way for the listener to tell which hill is meant).

                – ruakh
                May 13 at 21:38














              14












              14








              14







              There is no way to know. As mentioned in a comment, using the indefinite article "a" does not mean that the hikers could not have climbed the same hill.



              "There was an event at the park. Each participant crossed a stream, climbed a hill, and rode a bike 5 kilometers."



              There is only one stream and one hill in the park. And of course, there was more than one bike -- each person had his own bike, because, really, what else would make sense? Sometimes, context is all, and language is not math. The sentence is grammatically and factually correct. However, it's possible that there was one bike and they took turns riding it. That would be something that a scientific paper, legal brief, or other technical documentation would have to clarify. In creative writing, that kind of precision can kill the flow and tone.






              share|improve this answer













              There is no way to know. As mentioned in a comment, using the indefinite article "a" does not mean that the hikers could not have climbed the same hill.



              "There was an event at the park. Each participant crossed a stream, climbed a hill, and rode a bike 5 kilometers."



              There is only one stream and one hill in the park. And of course, there was more than one bike -- each person had his own bike, because, really, what else would make sense? Sometimes, context is all, and language is not math. The sentence is grammatically and factually correct. However, it's possible that there was one bike and they took turns riding it. That would be something that a scientific paper, legal brief, or other technical documentation would have to clarify. In creative writing, that kind of precision can kill the flow and tone.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered May 13 at 13:03









              user8356user8356

              1,23359




              1,23359








              • 1





                Excellent example, showing that both interpretations are plausible.

                – Rosie F
                May 13 at 13:21






              • 1





                I'd argue that "Each participant crossed the stream, climbed the hill, and rode a bike" is more informative and is preferable to using the indefinite article. I don't see any reason to be ambiguous about it if everyone is indeed crossing the same stream and climbing the same hill. It's not wrong, but good writing shouldn't leave the door open for misinterpretation.

                – Nuclear Wang
                May 13 at 14:08






              • 1





                More amusing interpretation: Each participant was on the same bike at the same time.

                – Zack
                May 13 at 14:30











              • @Zack Not unlikely if it was an event for clowns or acrobats.

                – Barmar
                May 13 at 18:07











              • @NuclearWang: I'd consider *"the hill" to be wrong in this context, unless the park has only one hill (or there's some other way for the listener to tell which hill is meant).

                – ruakh
                May 13 at 21:38














              • 1





                Excellent example, showing that both interpretations are plausible.

                – Rosie F
                May 13 at 13:21






              • 1





                I'd argue that "Each participant crossed the stream, climbed the hill, and rode a bike" is more informative and is preferable to using the indefinite article. I don't see any reason to be ambiguous about it if everyone is indeed crossing the same stream and climbing the same hill. It's not wrong, but good writing shouldn't leave the door open for misinterpretation.

                – Nuclear Wang
                May 13 at 14:08






              • 1





                More amusing interpretation: Each participant was on the same bike at the same time.

                – Zack
                May 13 at 14:30











              • @Zack Not unlikely if it was an event for clowns or acrobats.

                – Barmar
                May 13 at 18:07











              • @NuclearWang: I'd consider *"the hill" to be wrong in this context, unless the park has only one hill (or there's some other way for the listener to tell which hill is meant).

                – ruakh
                May 13 at 21:38








              1




              1





              Excellent example, showing that both interpretations are plausible.

              – Rosie F
              May 13 at 13:21





              Excellent example, showing that both interpretations are plausible.

              – Rosie F
              May 13 at 13:21




              1




              1





              I'd argue that "Each participant crossed the stream, climbed the hill, and rode a bike" is more informative and is preferable to using the indefinite article. I don't see any reason to be ambiguous about it if everyone is indeed crossing the same stream and climbing the same hill. It's not wrong, but good writing shouldn't leave the door open for misinterpretation.

              – Nuclear Wang
              May 13 at 14:08





              I'd argue that "Each participant crossed the stream, climbed the hill, and rode a bike" is more informative and is preferable to using the indefinite article. I don't see any reason to be ambiguous about it if everyone is indeed crossing the same stream and climbing the same hill. It's not wrong, but good writing shouldn't leave the door open for misinterpretation.

              – Nuclear Wang
              May 13 at 14:08




              1




              1





              More amusing interpretation: Each participant was on the same bike at the same time.

              – Zack
              May 13 at 14:30





              More amusing interpretation: Each participant was on the same bike at the same time.

              – Zack
              May 13 at 14:30













              @Zack Not unlikely if it was an event for clowns or acrobats.

              – Barmar
              May 13 at 18:07





              @Zack Not unlikely if it was an event for clowns or acrobats.

              – Barmar
              May 13 at 18:07













              @NuclearWang: I'd consider *"the hill" to be wrong in this context, unless the park has only one hill (or there's some other way for the listener to tell which hill is meant).

              – ruakh
              May 13 at 21:38





              @NuclearWang: I'd consider *"the hill" to be wrong in this context, unless the park has only one hill (or there's some other way for the listener to tell which hill is meant).

              – ruakh
              May 13 at 21:38











              13














              The indefinite determiner "a" represents all things in a given category rather than the more specific definite determiner "the". So, if you were to ask me, "Every Hiker climbed a hill" represents a specific group of hikers who climbed non-specific hills and not the same hill. If the sentence said, If every hiker had climbed the hill, it would be only one hill.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Does the use of "a" preclude the possibility of every hiker climbing the same hill? It seems a bit pedantic but the statement would still be true if every hiker climbed the same hill.

                – Areeb
                May 13 at 11:20






              • 12





                @Areeb No, it doesn't exclude the possibility that there was only one hill. It also doesn't exclude the possibility that there were no hikers at all!

                – alephzero
                May 13 at 11:29











              • @Areeb It's true that "a" can be used to refer to the same non-specific hill, but then I would personally use "every hiker climbed some hill" to convey that "[they all climbed the same hill, but I don't know which one]". This is something that would hopefully become more clear in full context.

                – Sam
                May 13 at 13:57











              • Re: ambiguity: Imo, that's why the question ask about "most correct"

                – Jeffrey
                May 13 at 15:10






              • 1





                @Sam. I think "every hiker climbed some hill" makes it even less likely to mean they all climbed the same hill than "every hiker climbed a hill" does.

                – Monty Harder
                May 13 at 15:51
















              13














              The indefinite determiner "a" represents all things in a given category rather than the more specific definite determiner "the". So, if you were to ask me, "Every Hiker climbed a hill" represents a specific group of hikers who climbed non-specific hills and not the same hill. If the sentence said, If every hiker had climbed the hill, it would be only one hill.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Does the use of "a" preclude the possibility of every hiker climbing the same hill? It seems a bit pedantic but the statement would still be true if every hiker climbed the same hill.

                – Areeb
                May 13 at 11:20






              • 12





                @Areeb No, it doesn't exclude the possibility that there was only one hill. It also doesn't exclude the possibility that there were no hikers at all!

                – alephzero
                May 13 at 11:29











              • @Areeb It's true that "a" can be used to refer to the same non-specific hill, but then I would personally use "every hiker climbed some hill" to convey that "[they all climbed the same hill, but I don't know which one]". This is something that would hopefully become more clear in full context.

                – Sam
                May 13 at 13:57











              • Re: ambiguity: Imo, that's why the question ask about "most correct"

                – Jeffrey
                May 13 at 15:10






              • 1





                @Sam. I think "every hiker climbed some hill" makes it even less likely to mean they all climbed the same hill than "every hiker climbed a hill" does.

                – Monty Harder
                May 13 at 15:51














              13












              13








              13







              The indefinite determiner "a" represents all things in a given category rather than the more specific definite determiner "the". So, if you were to ask me, "Every Hiker climbed a hill" represents a specific group of hikers who climbed non-specific hills and not the same hill. If the sentence said, If every hiker had climbed the hill, it would be only one hill.






              share|improve this answer













              The indefinite determiner "a" represents all things in a given category rather than the more specific definite determiner "the". So, if you were to ask me, "Every Hiker climbed a hill" represents a specific group of hikers who climbed non-specific hills and not the same hill. If the sentence said, If every hiker had climbed the hill, it would be only one hill.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered May 13 at 10:52









              GlenGlen

              1393




              1393













              • Does the use of "a" preclude the possibility of every hiker climbing the same hill? It seems a bit pedantic but the statement would still be true if every hiker climbed the same hill.

                – Areeb
                May 13 at 11:20






              • 12





                @Areeb No, it doesn't exclude the possibility that there was only one hill. It also doesn't exclude the possibility that there were no hikers at all!

                – alephzero
                May 13 at 11:29











              • @Areeb It's true that "a" can be used to refer to the same non-specific hill, but then I would personally use "every hiker climbed some hill" to convey that "[they all climbed the same hill, but I don't know which one]". This is something that would hopefully become more clear in full context.

                – Sam
                May 13 at 13:57











              • Re: ambiguity: Imo, that's why the question ask about "most correct"

                – Jeffrey
                May 13 at 15:10






              • 1





                @Sam. I think "every hiker climbed some hill" makes it even less likely to mean they all climbed the same hill than "every hiker climbed a hill" does.

                – Monty Harder
                May 13 at 15:51



















              • Does the use of "a" preclude the possibility of every hiker climbing the same hill? It seems a bit pedantic but the statement would still be true if every hiker climbed the same hill.

                – Areeb
                May 13 at 11:20






              • 12





                @Areeb No, it doesn't exclude the possibility that there was only one hill. It also doesn't exclude the possibility that there were no hikers at all!

                – alephzero
                May 13 at 11:29











              • @Areeb It's true that "a" can be used to refer to the same non-specific hill, but then I would personally use "every hiker climbed some hill" to convey that "[they all climbed the same hill, but I don't know which one]". This is something that would hopefully become more clear in full context.

                – Sam
                May 13 at 13:57











              • Re: ambiguity: Imo, that's why the question ask about "most correct"

                – Jeffrey
                May 13 at 15:10






              • 1





                @Sam. I think "every hiker climbed some hill" makes it even less likely to mean they all climbed the same hill than "every hiker climbed a hill" does.

                – Monty Harder
                May 13 at 15:51

















              Does the use of "a" preclude the possibility of every hiker climbing the same hill? It seems a bit pedantic but the statement would still be true if every hiker climbed the same hill.

              – Areeb
              May 13 at 11:20





              Does the use of "a" preclude the possibility of every hiker climbing the same hill? It seems a bit pedantic but the statement would still be true if every hiker climbed the same hill.

              – Areeb
              May 13 at 11:20




              12




              12





              @Areeb No, it doesn't exclude the possibility that there was only one hill. It also doesn't exclude the possibility that there were no hikers at all!

              – alephzero
              May 13 at 11:29





              @Areeb No, it doesn't exclude the possibility that there was only one hill. It also doesn't exclude the possibility that there were no hikers at all!

              – alephzero
              May 13 at 11:29













              @Areeb It's true that "a" can be used to refer to the same non-specific hill, but then I would personally use "every hiker climbed some hill" to convey that "[they all climbed the same hill, but I don't know which one]". This is something that would hopefully become more clear in full context.

              – Sam
              May 13 at 13:57





              @Areeb It's true that "a" can be used to refer to the same non-specific hill, but then I would personally use "every hiker climbed some hill" to convey that "[they all climbed the same hill, but I don't know which one]". This is something that would hopefully become more clear in full context.

              – Sam
              May 13 at 13:57













              Re: ambiguity: Imo, that's why the question ask about "most correct"

              – Jeffrey
              May 13 at 15:10





              Re: ambiguity: Imo, that's why the question ask about "most correct"

              – Jeffrey
              May 13 at 15:10




              1




              1





              @Sam. I think "every hiker climbed some hill" makes it even less likely to mean they all climbed the same hill than "every hiker climbed a hill" does.

              – Monty Harder
              May 13 at 15:51





              @Sam. I think "every hiker climbed some hill" makes it even less likely to mean they all climbed the same hill than "every hiker climbed a hill" does.

              – Monty Harder
              May 13 at 15:51











              3














              This seems quite clear to me. In the first picture, every climber climbed a hill; in the second picture, every climber climbed the hill. It is easy to construct counter-examples where the second picture is described as "every climber climbed a hill", but the default meaning is represented in the first picture. This is why the question is "Which image is most correct?"






              share|improve this answer
























              • If a particular hill was not previously established, then the correct sentence for the second picture would be "There was a hill that every hiker climbed."

                – Acccumulation
                May 13 at 15:56
















              3














              This seems quite clear to me. In the first picture, every climber climbed a hill; in the second picture, every climber climbed the hill. It is easy to construct counter-examples where the second picture is described as "every climber climbed a hill", but the default meaning is represented in the first picture. This is why the question is "Which image is most correct?"






              share|improve this answer
























              • If a particular hill was not previously established, then the correct sentence for the second picture would be "There was a hill that every hiker climbed."

                – Acccumulation
                May 13 at 15:56














              3












              3








              3







              This seems quite clear to me. In the first picture, every climber climbed a hill; in the second picture, every climber climbed the hill. It is easy to construct counter-examples where the second picture is described as "every climber climbed a hill", but the default meaning is represented in the first picture. This is why the question is "Which image is most correct?"






              share|improve this answer













              This seems quite clear to me. In the first picture, every climber climbed a hill; in the second picture, every climber climbed the hill. It is easy to construct counter-examples where the second picture is described as "every climber climbed a hill", but the default meaning is represented in the first picture. This is why the question is "Which image is most correct?"







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered May 13 at 13:07









              TonyKTonyK

              2,002310




              2,002310













              • If a particular hill was not previously established, then the correct sentence for the second picture would be "There was a hill that every hiker climbed."

                – Acccumulation
                May 13 at 15:56



















              • If a particular hill was not previously established, then the correct sentence for the second picture would be "There was a hill that every hiker climbed."

                – Acccumulation
                May 13 at 15:56

















              If a particular hill was not previously established, then the correct sentence for the second picture would be "There was a hill that every hiker climbed."

              – Acccumulation
              May 13 at 15:56





              If a particular hill was not previously established, then the correct sentence for the second picture would be "There was a hill that every hiker climbed."

              – Acccumulation
              May 13 at 15:56











              1














              In my native dialect (General American), it’s ambiguous, but I’d assume it probably meant multiple hills. “Each hiker climbed a hill,” makes that presumption even stronger. “Every hiker climbed the [same] hill,” and “Every hiker climbed his [own] hill,” are both unambiguous.






              share|improve this answer




























                1














                In my native dialect (General American), it’s ambiguous, but I’d assume it probably meant multiple hills. “Each hiker climbed a hill,” makes that presumption even stronger. “Every hiker climbed the [same] hill,” and “Every hiker climbed his [own] hill,” are both unambiguous.






                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  In my native dialect (General American), it’s ambiguous, but I’d assume it probably meant multiple hills. “Each hiker climbed a hill,” makes that presumption even stronger. “Every hiker climbed the [same] hill,” and “Every hiker climbed his [own] hill,” are both unambiguous.






                  share|improve this answer













                  In my native dialect (General American), it’s ambiguous, but I’d assume it probably meant multiple hills. “Each hiker climbed a hill,” makes that presumption even stronger. “Every hiker climbed the [same] hill,” and “Every hiker climbed his [own] hill,” are both unambiguous.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered May 13 at 18:38









                  DavislorDavislor

                  2,376316




                  2,376316















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                      He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                      Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029