How to use Commas When an Introductory Clause Precedes a Dependent/Subordinate Clause
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:
- In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.
- Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.
I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:
- If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
- To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.
But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:
- Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.
Any thoughts?
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
asked Aug 13 '18 at 15:16
DimitriDimitri
111
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 56 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:
- In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.
- Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.
I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:
- If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
- To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.
But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:
- Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.
Any thoughts?
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
asked Aug 13 '18 at 15:16
DimitriDimitri
111
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 56 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 '18 at 16:10
add a comment |
I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:
- In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.
- Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.
I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:
- If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
- To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.
But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:
- Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.
Any thoughts?
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
asked Aug 13 '18 at 15:16
DimitriDimitri
111
I think we all agree that most introductory clauses are set off by commas. E.g.:
- In 1982, John Smith went to battle in Spain.
- Moreover, the monkeys all ate bread.
I think we also agree that conditional sentences require commas between the dependent clause and the main clause:
- If James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
- To avoid hitting the man, Debra aimed the other way.
But what happens when we combine an introductory clause with a conditional sentence? My instinct would be to include all the commas like this:
- Accordingly, if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese.
But my editor looked at the sentence above and thought it looked weird. Indeed, now that "if James goes to the store" is separated by a comma on both sides it looks like its a parenthetical (which it isn't). I fixed the sentence by just changing the "Accordingly" to "So," which doesn't require a commma even though its an introductory clause (e.g.: "So if James goes to the store, then I want him to bring me some cheese."), but I'd like to know if my original formulation is correct or not.
Any thoughts?
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
punctuation commas subordinate-clauses dependent-clause parenthetical-commas
asked Aug 13 '18 at 15:16
DimitriDimitri
111
asked Aug 13 '18 at 15:16
DimitriDimitri
111
asked Aug 13 '18 at 15:16
DimitriDimitri
111
asked Aug 13 '18 at 15:16
DimitriDimitri
111
asked Aug 13 '18 at 15:16
DimitriDimitri
111
111
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 56 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 56 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 '18 at 16:10
add a comment |
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 '18 at 16:10
1
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 '18 at 16:10
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 '18 at 16:10
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
answered Aug 13 '18 at 17:23
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.1k32648
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459964%2fhow-to-use-commas-when-an-introductory-clause-precedes-a-dependent-subordinate-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
answered Aug 13 '18 at 17:23
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.1k32648
add a comment |
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
answered Aug 13 '18 at 17:23
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.1k32648
add a comment |
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
answered Aug 13 '18 at 17:23
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.1k32648
There is nothing wrong with your use of commas. It follows normal guidelines, and should not have been questioned by your editor on those terms alone. (Many perfectly grammatical constructions use a number of commas.)
However, if there is an insistence on not using commas in such a way that they could be misinterpreted as parenthetical (there is some merit in reducing unnecessary parsing), then your sentence can rephrased by simply reversing the position of the conditional:
Accordingly, I want James to bring me some cheese if he goes to the store.
However, this is a matter of style rather than grammar.
answered Aug 13 '18 at 17:23
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.1k32648
answered Aug 13 '18 at 17:23
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.1k32648
answered Aug 13 '18 at 17:23
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.1k32648
answered Aug 13 '18 at 17:23
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.1k32648
20.1k32648
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459964%2fhow-to-use-commas-when-an-introductory-clause-precedes-a-dependent-subordinate-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Your original looks good to me.
– S Conroy
Aug 13 '18 at 16:10