Is “staff” singular or plural? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)“England (have/has) been the weaker side…”?I - plural or singular?Is “mathematics” singular or plural?Between + plural or singular?Plural or singular for 'hair'?Is it correct to say “spendings”?Singular or Plural matching?plural-singularThe majority: plural or singularsingular vs plural problem of “profile” in “We first build up a detailed profile of our customers and their requirements.”“The farthest reach” or “the farthest reaches”?

I'm thinking of a number

I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign

If I can make up priors, why can't I make up posteriors?

Passing functions in C++

Can't figure this one out.. What is the missing box?

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

What do you call the holes in a flute?

Working around an AWS network ACL rule limit

Problem when applying foreach loop

Estimated State payment too big --> money back; + 2018 Tax Reform

Estimate capacitor parameters

What did Darwin mean by 'squib' here?

How can players take actions together that are impossible otherwise?

Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?

Does a C shift expression have unsigned type? Why would Splint warn about a right-shift?

Strange behaviour of Check

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

Keep going mode for require-package

Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?

Is there folklore associating late breastfeeding with low intelligence and/or gullibility?

Why is "Captain Marvel" translated as male in Portugal?

What are the performance impacts of 'functional' Rust?

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?



Is “staff” singular or plural?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)“England (have/has) been the weaker side…”?I - plural or singular?Is “mathematics” singular or plural?Between + plural or singular?Plural or singular for 'hair'?Is it correct to say “spendings”?Singular or Plural matching?plural-singularThe majority: plural or singularsingular vs plural problem of “profile” in “We first build up a detailed profile of our customers and their requirements.”“The farthest reach” or “the farthest reaches”?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








10















In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":




We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.




(Emphasis changed.)



Shouldn't this be "arrives"?










share|improve this question



















  • 3





    Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

    – David K
    Mar 23 at 14:57











  • BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

    – chrylis
    Mar 23 at 20:32


















10















In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":




We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.




(Emphasis changed.)



Shouldn't this be "arrives"?










share|improve this question



















  • 3





    Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

    – David K
    Mar 23 at 14:57











  • BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

    – chrylis
    Mar 23 at 20:32














10












10








10


2






In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":




We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.




(Emphasis changed.)



Shouldn't this be "arrives"?










share|improve this question
















In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":




We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.




(Emphasis changed.)



Shouldn't this be "arrives"?







singular-vs-plural subject-verb-agreement grammatical-number






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 24 at 6:06









Solomon Ucko

1094




1094










asked Mar 23 at 11:51









oscar tabarezoscar tabarez

534




534







  • 3





    Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

    – David K
    Mar 23 at 14:57











  • BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

    – chrylis
    Mar 23 at 20:32













  • 3





    Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

    – David K
    Mar 23 at 14:57











  • BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

    – chrylis
    Mar 23 at 20:32








3




3





Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

– David K
Mar 23 at 14:57





Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

– David K
Mar 23 at 14:57













BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

– chrylis
Mar 23 at 20:32






BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

– chrylis
Mar 23 at 20:32











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8














EDIT



I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



We can correctly say:



When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




Meaning of staff in English
Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
an organization:



There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



There are over a hundred staff in the company.



He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




[ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff







share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:36






  • 2





    @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:46






  • 2





    @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:49






  • 1





    As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

    – Mixolydian
    Mar 23 at 14:21






  • 1





    I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

    – David K
    Mar 23 at 19:58


















7














In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




The staff in this shop are very helpful.







share|improve this answer























  • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

    – chasly from UK
    Mar 23 at 12:38











  • A staff of ten.

    – Kshitij Singh
    Mar 23 at 12:49











  • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

    – chasly from UK
    Mar 23 at 13:35


















1














In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "481"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201939%2fis-staff-singular-or-plural%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    EDIT



    I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




    It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



    We can correctly say:



    When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



    When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



    This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



    In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




    Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




    Meaning of staff in English
    Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
    an organization:



    There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



    The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



    There are over a hundred staff in the company.



    He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





    Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




    [ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
    support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff







    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:36






    • 2





      @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:46






    • 2





      @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:49






    • 1





      As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

      – Mixolydian
      Mar 23 at 14:21






    • 1





      I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

      – David K
      Mar 23 at 19:58















    8














    EDIT



    I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




    It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



    We can correctly say:



    When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



    When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



    This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



    In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




    Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




    Meaning of staff in English
    Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
    an organization:



    There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



    The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



    There are over a hundred staff in the company.



    He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





    Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




    [ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
    support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff







    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:36






    • 2





      @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:46






    • 2





      @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:49






    • 1





      As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

      – Mixolydian
      Mar 23 at 14:21






    • 1





      I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

      – David K
      Mar 23 at 19:58













    8












    8








    8







    EDIT



    I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




    It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



    We can correctly say:



    When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



    When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



    This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



    In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




    Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




    Meaning of staff in English
    Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
    an organization:



    There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



    The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



    There are over a hundred staff in the company.



    He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





    Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




    [ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
    support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff







    share|improve this answer















    EDIT



    I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




    It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



    We can correctly say:



    When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



    When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



    This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



    In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




    Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




    Meaning of staff in English
    Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
    an organization:



    There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



    The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



    There are over a hundred staff in the company.



    He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





    Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




    [ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
    support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 23 at 14:01

























    answered Mar 23 at 12:00









    chasly from UKchasly from UK

    2,989314




    2,989314







    • 3





      Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:36






    • 2





      @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:46






    • 2





      @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:49






    • 1





      As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

      – Mixolydian
      Mar 23 at 14:21






    • 1





      I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

      – David K
      Mar 23 at 19:58












    • 3





      Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:36






    • 2





      @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:46






    • 2





      @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

      – Michael Harvey
      Mar 23 at 12:49






    • 1





      As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

      – Mixolydian
      Mar 23 at 14:21






    • 1





      I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

      – David K
      Mar 23 at 19:58







    3




    3





    Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:36





    Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:36




    2




    2





    @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:46





    @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:46




    2




    2





    @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:49





    @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

    – Michael Harvey
    Mar 23 at 12:49




    1




    1





    As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

    – Mixolydian
    Mar 23 at 14:21





    As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

    – Mixolydian
    Mar 23 at 14:21




    1




    1





    I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

    – David K
    Mar 23 at 19:58





    I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

    – David K
    Mar 23 at 19:58













    7














    In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




    The staff in this shop are very helpful.







    share|improve this answer























    • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 12:38











    • A staff of ten.

      – Kshitij Singh
      Mar 23 at 12:49











    • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 13:35















    7














    In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




    The staff in this shop are very helpful.







    share|improve this answer























    • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 12:38











    • A staff of ten.

      – Kshitij Singh
      Mar 23 at 12:49











    • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 13:35













    7












    7








    7







    In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




    The staff in this shop are very helpful.







    share|improve this answer













    In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




    The staff in this shop are very helpful.








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 23 at 12:04









    Kshitij SinghKshitij Singh

    1,854319




    1,854319












    • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 12:38











    • A staff of ten.

      – Kshitij Singh
      Mar 23 at 12:49











    • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 13:35

















    • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 12:38











    • A staff of ten.

      – Kshitij Singh
      Mar 23 at 12:49











    • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

      – chasly from UK
      Mar 23 at 13:35
















    Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

    – chasly from UK
    Mar 23 at 12:38





    Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

    – chasly from UK
    Mar 23 at 12:38













    A staff of ten.

    – Kshitij Singh
    Mar 23 at 12:49





    A staff of ten.

    – Kshitij Singh
    Mar 23 at 12:49













    Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

    – chasly from UK
    Mar 23 at 13:35





    Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

    – chasly from UK
    Mar 23 at 13:35











    1














    In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



    It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



      It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



        It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.






        share|improve this answer













        In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



        It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 23 at 17:16









        user45266user45266

        1,433116




        1,433116



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201939%2fis-staff-singular-or-plural%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

            What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029