Bash method for viewing beginning and end of file












8















On queue-based clusters the Queue of pending jobs is shown from a command, say showqueue.



The command returns, in columns, a list of reasonable data like names, etc, but the columns/data don't really matter for the question.



I like using the utility watch like watch showqueue at times (with an alias of alias watch="watch " to force alias expansion of my command to watch). There is valuable data (Running jobs), in the first few lines, then pending jobs, etc, and some valuable summaries at the end.



However, at times the output of showqueue goes off the screen (Unbelievable, I know)! Ideally, I'd like some way to be able to see the beginning and end of the file at the same time.



The best I have so far is: showqueue > file; head -n 20 file > file2; echo "..." >> file2 ; tail -n 20 file >> file2; cat file2, and using watch on an alias of that.



Does anyone know of anything a little more flexible or single-utility? My solution gets a little nastier with bash loops to make the "..." break multilined, it's not adaptive to resizing the terminal window at all, and I'm sure there's more that I missed.



Any suggestions?










share|improve this question









New contributor




MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

    – MadisonCooper
    13 hours ago








  • 2





    Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    13 hours ago








  • 2





    I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    13 hours ago


















8















On queue-based clusters the Queue of pending jobs is shown from a command, say showqueue.



The command returns, in columns, a list of reasonable data like names, etc, but the columns/data don't really matter for the question.



I like using the utility watch like watch showqueue at times (with an alias of alias watch="watch " to force alias expansion of my command to watch). There is valuable data (Running jobs), in the first few lines, then pending jobs, etc, and some valuable summaries at the end.



However, at times the output of showqueue goes off the screen (Unbelievable, I know)! Ideally, I'd like some way to be able to see the beginning and end of the file at the same time.



The best I have so far is: showqueue > file; head -n 20 file > file2; echo "..." >> file2 ; tail -n 20 file >> file2; cat file2, and using watch on an alias of that.



Does anyone know of anything a little more flexible or single-utility? My solution gets a little nastier with bash loops to make the "..." break multilined, it's not adaptive to resizing the terminal window at all, and I'm sure there's more that I missed.



Any suggestions?










share|improve this question









New contributor




MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

    – MadisonCooper
    13 hours ago








  • 2





    Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    13 hours ago








  • 2





    I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    13 hours ago
















8












8








8








On queue-based clusters the Queue of pending jobs is shown from a command, say showqueue.



The command returns, in columns, a list of reasonable data like names, etc, but the columns/data don't really matter for the question.



I like using the utility watch like watch showqueue at times (with an alias of alias watch="watch " to force alias expansion of my command to watch). There is valuable data (Running jobs), in the first few lines, then pending jobs, etc, and some valuable summaries at the end.



However, at times the output of showqueue goes off the screen (Unbelievable, I know)! Ideally, I'd like some way to be able to see the beginning and end of the file at the same time.



The best I have so far is: showqueue > file; head -n 20 file > file2; echo "..." >> file2 ; tail -n 20 file >> file2; cat file2, and using watch on an alias of that.



Does anyone know of anything a little more flexible or single-utility? My solution gets a little nastier with bash loops to make the "..." break multilined, it's not adaptive to resizing the terminal window at all, and I'm sure there's more that I missed.



Any suggestions?










share|improve this question









New contributor




MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












On queue-based clusters the Queue of pending jobs is shown from a command, say showqueue.



The command returns, in columns, a list of reasonable data like names, etc, but the columns/data don't really matter for the question.



I like using the utility watch like watch showqueue at times (with an alias of alias watch="watch " to force alias expansion of my command to watch). There is valuable data (Running jobs), in the first few lines, then pending jobs, etc, and some valuable summaries at the end.



However, at times the output of showqueue goes off the screen (Unbelievable, I know)! Ideally, I'd like some way to be able to see the beginning and end of the file at the same time.



The best I have so far is: showqueue > file; head -n 20 file > file2; echo "..." >> file2 ; tail -n 20 file >> file2; cat file2, and using watch on an alias of that.



Does anyone know of anything a little more flexible or single-utility? My solution gets a little nastier with bash loops to make the "..." break multilined, it's not adaptive to resizing the terminal window at all, and I'm sure there's more that I missed.



Any suggestions?







bash text-processing






share|improve this question









New contributor




MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 14 hours ago









Rui F Ribeiro

41.8k1483142




41.8k1483142






New contributor




MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 14 hours ago









MadisonCooperMadisonCooper

433




433




New contributor




MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






MadisonCooper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

    – MadisonCooper
    13 hours ago








  • 2





    Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    13 hours ago








  • 2





    I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    13 hours ago





















  • Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

    – MadisonCooper
    13 hours ago








  • 2





    Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    13 hours ago








  • 2





    I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    13 hours ago



















Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

– MadisonCooper
13 hours ago







Closed as duplicate, but the question only shares similarities (Mine is more about a command, I learned, and not files), and the answers here didn't show up there, but if you insist

– MadisonCooper
13 hours ago






2




2





Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

– Stéphane Chazelas
13 hours ago







Fair enough. I've reopened. Note that the answer that you have accepted will only work for large outputs as noted at my answer at Command to display first few and last few lines of a file (try seq 30 | (head && tail) for instance).

– Stéphane Chazelas
13 hours ago






2




2





I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

– Stéphane Chazelas
13 hours ago







I meant that answer. That Q&A has two answers of mine because another Q&A was merged with it (see question history)

– Stéphane Chazelas
13 hours ago












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















12














Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



$ showqueue | (head && tail)





share|improve this answer



















  • 5





    Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

    – Kusalananda
    14 hours ago











  • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

    – MadisonCooper
    14 hours ago






  • 4





    @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

    – ilkkachu
    14 hours ago








  • 2





    @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

    – MadisonCooper
    14 hours ago








  • 3





    @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    13 hours ago



















2














awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



$ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n { a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; } 
END { print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; }'
1
2
3
...
99997
99998
99999


As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.






share|improve this answer


























  • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

    – mosvy
    13 hours ago











  • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

    – ilkkachu
    13 hours ago





















1














Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.






share|improve this answer

































    0














    You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



    awk 'NR<=n {print $0} { A[NR%n]=$0 } END { for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) if (NR+i>2*n)print A[(NR+i)%n] }' n=3 < <( seq 10 )


    After update its not simple anymore though,






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
















    • 1





      This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

      – Kusalananda
      14 hours ago











    • yes let me update

      – Abdurrahim
      14 hours ago











    • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

      – mosvy
      13 hours ago











    • :) ok adding that as well now I am curious what you will find next :D

      – Abdurrahim
      2 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    MadisonCooper is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508818%2fbash-method-for-viewing-beginning-and-end-of-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    12














    Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



    $ showqueue | (head && tail)





    share|improve this answer



















    • 5





      Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

      – Kusalananda
      14 hours ago











    • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

      – MadisonCooper
      14 hours ago






    • 4





      @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

      – ilkkachu
      14 hours ago








    • 2





      @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

      – MadisonCooper
      14 hours ago








    • 3





      @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

      – Stéphane Chazelas
      13 hours ago
















    12














    Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



    $ showqueue | (head && tail)





    share|improve this answer



















    • 5





      Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

      – Kusalananda
      14 hours ago











    • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

      – MadisonCooper
      14 hours ago






    • 4





      @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

      – ilkkachu
      14 hours ago








    • 2





      @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

      – MadisonCooper
      14 hours ago








    • 3





      @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

      – Stéphane Chazelas
      13 hours ago














    12












    12








    12







    Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



    $ showqueue | (head && tail)





    share|improve this answer













    Are you looking to do something like the following? Shows output from both head and tail.



    $ showqueue | (head && tail)






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 14 hours ago









    Timothy PulliamTimothy Pulliam

    1,375925




    1,375925








    • 5





      Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

      – Kusalananda
      14 hours ago











    • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

      – MadisonCooper
      14 hours ago






    • 4





      @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

      – ilkkachu
      14 hours ago








    • 2





      @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

      – MadisonCooper
      14 hours ago








    • 3





      @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

      – Stéphane Chazelas
      13 hours ago














    • 5





      Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

      – Kusalananda
      14 hours ago











    • Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

      – MadisonCooper
      14 hours ago






    • 4





      @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

      – ilkkachu
      14 hours ago








    • 2





      @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

      – MadisonCooper
      14 hours ago








    • 3





      @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

      – Stéphane Chazelas
      13 hours ago








    5




    5





    Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

    – Kusalananda
    14 hours ago





    Some implementations of head may read more than 10 lines and leave nothing for tail to read. The utility is not supposed to do that and I believe that the GNU tools are well behave in this respect. Use head; echo '...'; tail to get the dots in there as well.

    – Kusalananda
    14 hours ago













    Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

    – MadisonCooper
    14 hours ago





    Yeah, combined with @Kusalananda's comment it's much more succinct than my solution. I'll mark as correct for now! Thanks.

    – MadisonCooper
    14 hours ago




    4




    4





    @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

    – ilkkachu
    14 hours ago







    @Kusalananda, nope, on my system, GNU head (coreutils 8.26) reads blocks of 8192 bytes. It does try to seek back, but obviously can't in case of a pipe. Though anyway, is there really a requirement for head to not over-read? (same on Mac, it seems to read by blocks)

    – ilkkachu
    14 hours ago






    2




    2





    @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

    – MadisonCooper
    14 hours ago







    @ilkkachu yeah, even as it stands the tail part is occasionally blank even on sufficiently long output (I know since I'm using head -n 35, and that's full), but fortunately it's just a convenience to watch and I can wait 3 seconds for a refresh if needed.

    – MadisonCooper
    14 hours ago






    3




    3





    @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    13 hours ago





    @Kusalananda, POSIX allows implementations to do that when the input is not seekable and most implementations do. Not doing it would mean reading one byte at a time which would be very inefficient (or put the data back onto the pipe where supported which would cause all sorts of different problems). The only head implementation I know that reads one byte at a time to avoid reading past the 10th newline is ksh93's head builtin.

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    13 hours ago













    2














    awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



    $ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n { a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; } 
    END { print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; }'
    1
    2
    3
    ...
    99997
    99998
    99999


    As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



    In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.






    share|improve this answer


























    • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

      – mosvy
      13 hours ago











    • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

      – ilkkachu
      13 hours ago


















    2














    awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



    $ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n { a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; } 
    END { print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; }'
    1
    2
    3
    ...
    99997
    99998
    99999


    As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



    In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.






    share|improve this answer


























    • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

      – mosvy
      13 hours ago











    • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

      – ilkkachu
      13 hours ago
















    2












    2








    2







    awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



    $ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n { a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; } 
    END { print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; }'
    1
    2
    3
    ...
    99997
    99998
    99999


    As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



    In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.






    share|improve this answer















    awk solution for an arbitrary number of lines shown from the head and the tail (change n=3 to set the amount):



    $ seq 99999 | awk -v n=3 'NR <= n; NR > n { a[NR] = $0; delete a[NR-n]; } 
    END { print "..."; for (i = NR-n+1; i <= NR; i++) if (i in a) print a[i]; }'
    1
    2
    3
    ...
    99997
    99998
    99999


    As it's written, the head and tail parts will not overlap, even if the input is shorter than 2*n lines.



    In some awk implementations, using for (x in a) print a[x]; in the END part also works. But in general, it's not guaranteed to return the array entries in the correct order, and doesn't in e.g. mawk.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 13 hours ago

























    answered 14 hours ago









    ilkkachuilkkachu

    62.7k10103180




    62.7k10103180













    • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

      – mosvy
      13 hours ago











    • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

      – ilkkachu
      13 hours ago





















    • If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

      – mosvy
      13 hours ago











    • @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

      – ilkkachu
      13 hours ago



















    If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

    – mosvy
    13 hours ago





    If m is the number of lines in the file, and m < 2n, that will print 2n - m empty lines. Also have look here ;-). for (x in a) will iterate in order only in GNU awk; if you think that it works in mawk too, test with > 10 values.

    – mosvy
    13 hours ago













    @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

    – ilkkachu
    13 hours ago







    @mosvy, oh, whoops, I forgot to re-check that after realizing x in a wasn't right. Fixed now, thanks. There's also another awk answer in the question Stéphane linked to. I like the modulo trick, though!

    – ilkkachu
    13 hours ago













    1














    Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



    showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


    This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.






    share|improve this answer






























      1














      Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



      showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


      This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.






      share|improve this answer




























        1












        1








        1







        Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



        showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


        This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.






        share|improve this answer















        Using the same approach as you, using a temporary file, but doing it slightly shorter:



        showqueue >/tmp/q.out; head -n 20 /tmp/q.out; echo '...'; tail -n 20 /tmp/q.out


        This would not suffer from the same issues as discussed under another answer, but would possibly show the same lines twice if the output was shorter than 40 lines.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 13 hours ago

























        answered 14 hours ago









        KusalanandaKusalananda

        138k17258426




        138k17258426























            0














            You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



            awk 'NR<=n {print $0} { A[NR%n]=$0 } END { for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) if (NR+i>2*n)print A[(NR+i)%n] }' n=3 < <( seq 10 )


            After update its not simple anymore though,






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.
















            • 1





              This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

              – Kusalananda
              14 hours ago











            • yes let me update

              – Abdurrahim
              14 hours ago











            • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

              – mosvy
              13 hours ago











            • :) ok adding that as well now I am curious what you will find next :D

              – Abdurrahim
              2 hours ago
















            0














            You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



            awk 'NR<=n {print $0} { A[NR%n]=$0 } END { for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) if (NR+i>2*n)print A[(NR+i)%n] }' n=3 < <( seq 10 )


            After update its not simple anymore though,






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.
















            • 1





              This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

              – Kusalananda
              14 hours ago











            • yes let me update

              – Abdurrahim
              14 hours ago











            • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

              – mosvy
              13 hours ago











            • :) ok adding that as well now I am curious what you will find next :D

              – Abdurrahim
              2 hours ago














            0












            0








            0







            You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



            awk 'NR<=n {print $0} { A[NR%n]=$0 } END { for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) if (NR+i>2*n)print A[(NR+i)%n] }' n=3 < <( seq 10 )


            After update its not simple anymore though,






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.










            You can use simple awk script. Added circle buffer there n=3 is for last 3 lines



            awk 'NR<=n {print $0} { A[NR%n]=$0 } END { for (i=1; i<=n; ++i) if (NR+i>2*n)print A[(NR+i)%n] }' n=3 < <( seq 10 )


            After update its not simple anymore though,







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 2 hours ago





















            New contributor




            Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 14 hours ago









            AbdurrahimAbdurrahim

            1012




            1012




            New contributor




            Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Abdurrahim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            • 1





              This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

              – Kusalananda
              14 hours ago











            • yes let me update

              – Abdurrahim
              14 hours ago











            • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

              – mosvy
              13 hours ago











            • :) ok adding that as well now I am curious what you will find next :D

              – Abdurrahim
              2 hours ago














            • 1





              This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

              – Kusalananda
              14 hours ago











            • yes let me update

              – Abdurrahim
              14 hours ago











            • This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

              – mosvy
              13 hours ago











            • :) ok adding that as well now I am curious what you will find next :D

              – Abdurrahim
              2 hours ago








            1




            1





            This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

            – Kusalananda
            14 hours ago





            This would only show the first and last line. To show more than that, you would have to change NR==1 to NR <= 10 (or something), and then collect lines into a (circular?) buffer that you later output in the END block.

            – Kusalananda
            14 hours ago













            yes let me update

            – Abdurrahim
            14 hours ago





            yes let me update

            – Abdurrahim
            14 hours ago













            This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

            – mosvy
            13 hours ago





            This will print some lines twice when then the number of lines is less than 2 * n.

            – mosvy
            13 hours ago













            :) ok adding that as well now I am curious what you will find next :D

            – Abdurrahim
            2 hours ago





            :) ok adding that as well now I am curious what you will find next :D

            – Abdurrahim
            2 hours ago










            MadisonCooper is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            MadisonCooper is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            MadisonCooper is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            MadisonCooper is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508818%2fbash-method-for-viewing-beginning-and-end-of-file%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029