Implicit “which is”
Multi tool use
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
A new study has shown that millions of pieces of junk floating in space could be a big hazard for satellites orbiting Earth.
Is there an implicit "which is" in front of floating in space? Why is "which is" not written?
grammar relative-clauses reduced-relative-clauses
edited May 30 at 4:31
Laurel
37.8k7 gold badges77 silver badges129 bronze badges
asked May 6 '13 at 13:24
ukorausukoraus
72 bronze badges
add a comment
|
A new study has shown that millions of pieces of junk floating in space could be a big hazard for satellites orbiting Earth.
Is there an implicit "which is" in front of floating in space? Why is "which is" not written?
grammar relative-clauses reduced-relative-clauses
edited May 30 at 4:31
Laurel
37.8k7 gold badges77 silver badges129 bronze badges
asked May 6 '13 at 13:24
ukorausukoraus
72 bronze badges
2
Hi, I strongly suggest you visit ell.stackexchange.com
– mplungjan
May 6 '13 at 13:33
add a comment
|
A new study has shown that millions of pieces of junk floating in space could be a big hazard for satellites orbiting Earth.
Is there an implicit "which is" in front of floating in space? Why is "which is" not written?
grammar relative-clauses reduced-relative-clauses
edited May 30 at 4:31
Laurel
37.8k7 gold badges77 silver badges129 bronze badges
asked May 6 '13 at 13:24
ukorausukoraus
72 bronze badges
A new study has shown that millions of pieces of junk floating in space could be a big hazard for satellites orbiting Earth.
Is there an implicit "which is" in front of floating in space? Why is "which is" not written?
grammar relative-clauses reduced-relative-clauses
grammar relative-clauses reduced-relative-clauses
edited May 30 at 4:31
Laurel
37.8k7 gold badges77 silver badges129 bronze badges
asked May 6 '13 at 13:24
ukorausukoraus
72 bronze badges
edited May 30 at 4:31
Laurel
37.8k7 gold badges77 silver badges129 bronze badges
asked May 6 '13 at 13:24
ukorausukoraus
72 bronze badges
edited May 30 at 4:31
Laurel
37.8k7 gold badges77 silver badges129 bronze badges
edited May 30 at 4:31
Laurel
37.8k7 gold badges77 silver badges129 bronze badges
edited May 30 at 4:31
Laurel
37.8k7 gold badges77 silver badges129 bronze badges
37.8k7 gold badges77 silver badges129 bronze badges
asked May 6 '13 at 13:24
ukorausukoraus
72 bronze badges
asked May 6 '13 at 13:24
ukorausukoraus
72 bronze badges
asked May 6 '13 at 13:24
ukorausukoraus
72 bronze badges
72 bronze badges
2
Hi, I strongly suggest you visit ell.stackexchange.com
– mplungjan
May 6 '13 at 13:33
add a comment
|
2
Hi, I strongly suggest you visit ell.stackexchange.com
– mplungjan
May 6 '13 at 13:33
2
2
Hi, I strongly suggest you visit ell.stackexchange.com
– mplungjan
May 6 '13 at 13:33
Hi, I strongly suggest you visit ell.stackexchange.com
– mplungjan
May 6 '13 at 13:33
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
This is a reduced relative clause. We delete unnecessary elements of sentences to make them shorter and easier to read. The missing words are which are or that are.
2
And the OP's sentence contains a second example.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 6 '13 at 17:19
@EdwinA: +1 It's so natural that it's not even noticeable!
– user21497
May 7 '13 at 0:20
1
@EdwinAshworth: Yes, and the last few words of the sentence sound much better than, say, "satellites that orbit the Earth." They're also more concise, and the -ing suffixes "match" each other.
– rhetorician
May 7 '13 at 1:03
add a comment
|
This is a participle clause performing as a reduced defining relative clause. The verb floating is a present participle, ing form, and replaces the longer and in this case the more awkward which are or that are. It is a defining relative clause as you are clarifying to the reader which junk you are talking about i.e., the junk floating in space, as opposed to the junk lying in your garden.
answered May 7 '13 at 11:53
RoDaSmRoDaSm
3643 gold badges5 silver badges10 bronze badges
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f113309%2fimplicit-which-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is a reduced relative clause. We delete unnecessary elements of sentences to make them shorter and easier to read. The missing words are which are or that are.
2
And the OP's sentence contains a second example.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 6 '13 at 17:19
@EdwinA: +1 It's so natural that it's not even noticeable!
– user21497
May 7 '13 at 0:20
1
@EdwinAshworth: Yes, and the last few words of the sentence sound much better than, say, "satellites that orbit the Earth." They're also more concise, and the -ing suffixes "match" each other.
– rhetorician
May 7 '13 at 1:03
add a comment
|
This is a reduced relative clause. We delete unnecessary elements of sentences to make them shorter and easier to read. The missing words are which are or that are.
2
And the OP's sentence contains a second example.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 6 '13 at 17:19
@EdwinA: +1 It's so natural that it's not even noticeable!
– user21497
May 7 '13 at 0:20
1
@EdwinAshworth: Yes, and the last few words of the sentence sound much better than, say, "satellites that orbit the Earth." They're also more concise, and the -ing suffixes "match" each other.
– rhetorician
May 7 '13 at 1:03
add a comment
|
This is a reduced relative clause. We delete unnecessary elements of sentences to make them shorter and easier to read. The missing words are which are or that are.
This is a reduced relative clause. We delete unnecessary elements of sentences to make them shorter and easier to read. The missing words are which are or that are.
answered May 6 '13 at 13:54
user21497
2
And the OP's sentence contains a second example.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 6 '13 at 17:19
@EdwinA: +1 It's so natural that it's not even noticeable!
– user21497
May 7 '13 at 0:20
1
@EdwinAshworth: Yes, and the last few words of the sentence sound much better than, say, "satellites that orbit the Earth." They're also more concise, and the -ing suffixes "match" each other.
– rhetorician
May 7 '13 at 1:03
add a comment
|
2
And the OP's sentence contains a second example.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 6 '13 at 17:19
@EdwinA: +1 It's so natural that it's not even noticeable!
– user21497
May 7 '13 at 0:20
1
@EdwinAshworth: Yes, and the last few words of the sentence sound much better than, say, "satellites that orbit the Earth." They're also more concise, and the -ing suffixes "match" each other.
– rhetorician
May 7 '13 at 1:03
2
2
And the OP's sentence contains a second example.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 6 '13 at 17:19
And the OP's sentence contains a second example.
– Edwin Ashworth
May 6 '13 at 17:19
@EdwinA: +1 It's so natural that it's not even noticeable!
– user21497
May 7 '13 at 0:20
@EdwinA: +1 It's so natural that it's not even noticeable!
– user21497
May 7 '13 at 0:20
1
1
@EdwinAshworth: Yes, and the last few words of the sentence sound much better than, say, "satellites that orbit the Earth." They're also more concise, and the -ing suffixes "match" each other.
– rhetorician
May 7 '13 at 1:03
@EdwinAshworth: Yes, and the last few words of the sentence sound much better than, say, "satellites that orbit the Earth." They're also more concise, and the -ing suffixes "match" each other.
– rhetorician
May 7 '13 at 1:03
add a comment
|
This is a participle clause performing as a reduced defining relative clause. The verb floating is a present participle, ing form, and replaces the longer and in this case the more awkward which are or that are. It is a defining relative clause as you are clarifying to the reader which junk you are talking about i.e., the junk floating in space, as opposed to the junk lying in your garden.
answered May 7 '13 at 11:53
RoDaSmRoDaSm
3643 gold badges5 silver badges10 bronze badges
add a comment
|
This is a participle clause performing as a reduced defining relative clause. The verb floating is a present participle, ing form, and replaces the longer and in this case the more awkward which are or that are. It is a defining relative clause as you are clarifying to the reader which junk you are talking about i.e., the junk floating in space, as opposed to the junk lying in your garden.
answered May 7 '13 at 11:53
RoDaSmRoDaSm
3643 gold badges5 silver badges10 bronze badges
add a comment
|
This is a participle clause performing as a reduced defining relative clause. The verb floating is a present participle, ing form, and replaces the longer and in this case the more awkward which are or that are. It is a defining relative clause as you are clarifying to the reader which junk you are talking about i.e., the junk floating in space, as opposed to the junk lying in your garden.
answered May 7 '13 at 11:53
RoDaSmRoDaSm
3643 gold badges5 silver badges10 bronze badges
This is a participle clause performing as a reduced defining relative clause. The verb floating is a present participle, ing form, and replaces the longer and in this case the more awkward which are or that are. It is a defining relative clause as you are clarifying to the reader which junk you are talking about i.e., the junk floating in space, as opposed to the junk lying in your garden.
answered May 7 '13 at 11:53
RoDaSmRoDaSm
3643 gold badges5 silver badges10 bronze badges
answered May 7 '13 at 11:53
RoDaSmRoDaSm
3643 gold badges5 silver badges10 bronze badges
answered May 7 '13 at 11:53
RoDaSmRoDaSm
3643 gold badges5 silver badges10 bronze badges
answered May 7 '13 at 11:53
RoDaSmRoDaSm
3643 gold badges5 silver badges10 bronze badges
3643 gold badges5 silver badges10 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f113309%2fimplicit-which-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
XO7pmOy4ZG8lqiXMs3o7G,aUf6 iDysVd
2
Hi, I strongly suggest you visit ell.stackexchange.com
– mplungjan
May 6 '13 at 13:33