What are these giant NASA boxes?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}
.everyonelovesstackoverflow{position:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;}








2














$begingroup$


In this answer I saw Figure 35 of the encyclopaedic ISS Interface Mechanisms and their Heritage and from the link I saw Figure 37, and I've included both below (click for larger size).



What are these giant boxes or volumes to which these smaller things are docked? Where are they (in the photos), and what is are they for? They look too large to be a mock-up for the ISS or the Shuttle!



enter image description here



enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The top device holds the "porch" to the JEM. The bottom device holds experiments to the "porch".
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 0:21










  • $begingroup$
    @OrganicMarble In the top image (Fig. 35) a square box covered in white connects to the JEM, and a silver round box connects to the white square box. When the porch connects, do both of these stay in place and the porch connects to the round one? Hang on, I think I am going to ask this separately in about 3 minutes...
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    May 29 at 0:35










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, there is a fitting on the porch that mates with the round fitting.
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 0:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is a picture of the shuttle arm holding the porch. The corresponding fitting is visible commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:STS-127_JEM-EF.jpg
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 0:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    After this morning's fiasco I'm swearing off posting answers till I get home.
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 1:51


















2














$begingroup$


In this answer I saw Figure 35 of the encyclopaedic ISS Interface Mechanisms and their Heritage and from the link I saw Figure 37, and I've included both below (click for larger size).



What are these giant boxes or volumes to which these smaller things are docked? Where are they (in the photos), and what is are they for? They look too large to be a mock-up for the ISS or the Shuttle!



enter image description here



enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The top device holds the "porch" to the JEM. The bottom device holds experiments to the "porch".
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 0:21










  • $begingroup$
    @OrganicMarble In the top image (Fig. 35) a square box covered in white connects to the JEM, and a silver round box connects to the white square box. When the porch connects, do both of these stay in place and the porch connects to the round one? Hang on, I think I am going to ask this separately in about 3 minutes...
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    May 29 at 0:35










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, there is a fitting on the porch that mates with the round fitting.
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 0:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is a picture of the shuttle arm holding the porch. The corresponding fitting is visible commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:STS-127_JEM-EF.jpg
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 0:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    After this morning's fiasco I'm swearing off posting answers till I get home.
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 1:51














2












2








2





$begingroup$


In this answer I saw Figure 35 of the encyclopaedic ISS Interface Mechanisms and their Heritage and from the link I saw Figure 37, and I've included both below (click for larger size).



What are these giant boxes or volumes to which these smaller things are docked? Where are they (in the photos), and what is are they for? They look too large to be a mock-up for the ISS or the Shuttle!



enter image description here



enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




In this answer I saw Figure 35 of the encyclopaedic ISS Interface Mechanisms and their Heritage and from the link I saw Figure 37, and I've included both below (click for larger size).



What are these giant boxes or volumes to which these smaller things are docked? Where are they (in the photos), and what is are they for? They look too large to be a mock-up for the ISS or the Shuttle!



enter image description here



enter image description here







nasa identify-this-object docking docking-port






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question



share|improve this question








edited May 29 at 2:40







uhoh

















asked May 28 at 10:19









uhohuhoh

54.6k26 gold badges214 silver badges685 bronze badges




54.6k26 gold badges214 silver badges685 bronze badges











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The top device holds the "porch" to the JEM. The bottom device holds experiments to the "porch".
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 0:21










  • $begingroup$
    @OrganicMarble In the top image (Fig. 35) a square box covered in white connects to the JEM, and a silver round box connects to the white square box. When the porch connects, do both of these stay in place and the porch connects to the round one? Hang on, I think I am going to ask this separately in about 3 minutes...
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    May 29 at 0:35










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, there is a fitting on the porch that mates with the round fitting.
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 0:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is a picture of the shuttle arm holding the porch. The corresponding fitting is visible commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:STS-127_JEM-EF.jpg
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 0:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    After this morning's fiasco I'm swearing off posting answers till I get home.
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 1:51














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The top device holds the "porch" to the JEM. The bottom device holds experiments to the "porch".
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 0:21










  • $begingroup$
    @OrganicMarble In the top image (Fig. 35) a square box covered in white connects to the JEM, and a silver round box connects to the white square box. When the porch connects, do both of these stay in place and the porch connects to the round one? Hang on, I think I am going to ask this separately in about 3 minutes...
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    May 29 at 0:35










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, there is a fitting on the porch that mates with the round fitting.
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 0:41






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is a picture of the shuttle arm holding the porch. The corresponding fitting is visible commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:STS-127_JEM-EF.jpg
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 0:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    After this morning's fiasco I'm swearing off posting answers till I get home.
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 29 at 1:51








1




1




$begingroup$
The top device holds the "porch" to the JEM. The bottom device holds experiments to the "porch".
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 29 at 0:21




$begingroup$
The top device holds the "porch" to the JEM. The bottom device holds experiments to the "porch".
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 29 at 0:21












$begingroup$
@OrganicMarble In the top image (Fig. 35) a square box covered in white connects to the JEM, and a silver round box connects to the white square box. When the porch connects, do both of these stay in place and the porch connects to the round one? Hang on, I think I am going to ask this separately in about 3 minutes...
$endgroup$
– uhoh
May 29 at 0:35




$begingroup$
@OrganicMarble In the top image (Fig. 35) a square box covered in white connects to the JEM, and a silver round box connects to the white square box. When the porch connects, do both of these stay in place and the porch connects to the round one? Hang on, I think I am going to ask this separately in about 3 minutes...
$endgroup$
– uhoh
May 29 at 0:35












$begingroup$
Yes, there is a fitting on the porch that mates with the round fitting.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 29 at 0:41




$begingroup$
Yes, there is a fitting on the porch that mates with the round fitting.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 29 at 0:41




1




1




$begingroup$
Here is a picture of the shuttle arm holding the porch. The corresponding fitting is visible commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:STS-127_JEM-EF.jpg
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 29 at 0:55




$begingroup$
Here is a picture of the shuttle arm holding the porch. The corresponding fitting is visible commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:STS-127_JEM-EF.jpg
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 29 at 0:55




1




1




$begingroup$
After this morning's fiasco I'm swearing off posting answers till I get home.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 29 at 1:51




$begingroup$
After this morning's fiasco I'm swearing off posting answers till I get home.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 29 at 1:51










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















12
















$begingroup$

Fig. 35 View showing active EFBM



The "JPM/C2-09" marker is a dead giveaway: Its Kibo! JPM here means "JEM Pressurized Module" (with JEM being Japanese Experiment Module, the original name of Kibo).



Here is a good image showing Kibo, taken in the Space Station Processing Facility, where it rests on a workstand during pre-assembly measurement activities on Nov. 5th, 2003:



Kibo Module



You can clearly see the "JPM/C2-09" label and the overall similarity.







Fig. 37 View showing EFU



The second image shows The JEM Exposed Facility (EF), and the port is an Exposed Facility Unit (EFU) used to dock experiments to the JEM-EF.



The EF can be seen in this schematic:



Kibo Schematic



Your confusion likely stems from the fact that the EFBM (Exposed Facility berthing Mechanism) is substantially smaller then the CBM which is used to dock Kibo to the ISS. Without a good scale reference in the cropped image, the module looks far bigger then it is.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    I am sorry i edited your answer, i will fix asap. Damn mobile app.
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 28 at 13:14










  • $begingroup$
    @OrganicMarble No worries, mistakes happen. I've rerolled the revision.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 28 at 13:19










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!!!!!!
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 28 at 13:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uhoh From the image description: "In the Space Station Processing Facility, the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM) rests on a workstand during pre-assembly measurement activities. Developed by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), the JEM will enhance the unique research capabilities of the orbiting complex by providing an additional environment for astronauts to conduct science experiments." Taken on 5th of November 2003.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 29 at 6:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uhoh I already edited that in directly after I made the comment, its the image description on wikipedia which the image is hyperlinked to. I am not entirely sure when the image in your document was taken, but if you look at the background (especially the black panels and the green-ish lower portion of the wall) it seems to be taken on the same stand, but from closer to the module making the angle steeper. I can not say when or in which facility the second of your images was taken, but logic would suggest the date is somewhat close together.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 29 at 9:02













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});















draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36438%2fwhat-are-these-giant-nasa-boxes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12
















$begingroup$

Fig. 35 View showing active EFBM



The "JPM/C2-09" marker is a dead giveaway: Its Kibo! JPM here means "JEM Pressurized Module" (with JEM being Japanese Experiment Module, the original name of Kibo).



Here is a good image showing Kibo, taken in the Space Station Processing Facility, where it rests on a workstand during pre-assembly measurement activities on Nov. 5th, 2003:



Kibo Module



You can clearly see the "JPM/C2-09" label and the overall similarity.







Fig. 37 View showing EFU



The second image shows The JEM Exposed Facility (EF), and the port is an Exposed Facility Unit (EFU) used to dock experiments to the JEM-EF.



The EF can be seen in this schematic:



Kibo Schematic



Your confusion likely stems from the fact that the EFBM (Exposed Facility berthing Mechanism) is substantially smaller then the CBM which is used to dock Kibo to the ISS. Without a good scale reference in the cropped image, the module looks far bigger then it is.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    I am sorry i edited your answer, i will fix asap. Damn mobile app.
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 28 at 13:14










  • $begingroup$
    @OrganicMarble No worries, mistakes happen. I've rerolled the revision.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 28 at 13:19










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!!!!!!
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 28 at 13:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uhoh From the image description: "In the Space Station Processing Facility, the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM) rests on a workstand during pre-assembly measurement activities. Developed by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), the JEM will enhance the unique research capabilities of the orbiting complex by providing an additional environment for astronauts to conduct science experiments." Taken on 5th of November 2003.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 29 at 6:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uhoh I already edited that in directly after I made the comment, its the image description on wikipedia which the image is hyperlinked to. I am not entirely sure when the image in your document was taken, but if you look at the background (especially the black panels and the green-ish lower portion of the wall) it seems to be taken on the same stand, but from closer to the module making the angle steeper. I can not say when or in which facility the second of your images was taken, but logic would suggest the date is somewhat close together.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 29 at 9:02
















12
















$begingroup$

Fig. 35 View showing active EFBM



The "JPM/C2-09" marker is a dead giveaway: Its Kibo! JPM here means "JEM Pressurized Module" (with JEM being Japanese Experiment Module, the original name of Kibo).



Here is a good image showing Kibo, taken in the Space Station Processing Facility, where it rests on a workstand during pre-assembly measurement activities on Nov. 5th, 2003:



Kibo Module



You can clearly see the "JPM/C2-09" label and the overall similarity.







Fig. 37 View showing EFU



The second image shows The JEM Exposed Facility (EF), and the port is an Exposed Facility Unit (EFU) used to dock experiments to the JEM-EF.



The EF can be seen in this schematic:



Kibo Schematic



Your confusion likely stems from the fact that the EFBM (Exposed Facility berthing Mechanism) is substantially smaller then the CBM which is used to dock Kibo to the ISS. Without a good scale reference in the cropped image, the module looks far bigger then it is.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    I am sorry i edited your answer, i will fix asap. Damn mobile app.
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 28 at 13:14










  • $begingroup$
    @OrganicMarble No worries, mistakes happen. I've rerolled the revision.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 28 at 13:19










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!!!!!!
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 28 at 13:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uhoh From the image description: "In the Space Station Processing Facility, the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM) rests on a workstand during pre-assembly measurement activities. Developed by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), the JEM will enhance the unique research capabilities of the orbiting complex by providing an additional environment for astronauts to conduct science experiments." Taken on 5th of November 2003.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 29 at 6:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uhoh I already edited that in directly after I made the comment, its the image description on wikipedia which the image is hyperlinked to. I am not entirely sure when the image in your document was taken, but if you look at the background (especially the black panels and the green-ish lower portion of the wall) it seems to be taken on the same stand, but from closer to the module making the angle steeper. I can not say when or in which facility the second of your images was taken, but logic would suggest the date is somewhat close together.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 29 at 9:02














12














12










12







$begingroup$

Fig. 35 View showing active EFBM



The "JPM/C2-09" marker is a dead giveaway: Its Kibo! JPM here means "JEM Pressurized Module" (with JEM being Japanese Experiment Module, the original name of Kibo).



Here is a good image showing Kibo, taken in the Space Station Processing Facility, where it rests on a workstand during pre-assembly measurement activities on Nov. 5th, 2003:



Kibo Module



You can clearly see the "JPM/C2-09" label and the overall similarity.







Fig. 37 View showing EFU



The second image shows The JEM Exposed Facility (EF), and the port is an Exposed Facility Unit (EFU) used to dock experiments to the JEM-EF.



The EF can be seen in this schematic:



Kibo Schematic



Your confusion likely stems from the fact that the EFBM (Exposed Facility berthing Mechanism) is substantially smaller then the CBM which is used to dock Kibo to the ISS. Without a good scale reference in the cropped image, the module looks far bigger then it is.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$



Fig. 35 View showing active EFBM



The "JPM/C2-09" marker is a dead giveaway: Its Kibo! JPM here means "JEM Pressurized Module" (with JEM being Japanese Experiment Module, the original name of Kibo).



Here is a good image showing Kibo, taken in the Space Station Processing Facility, where it rests on a workstand during pre-assembly measurement activities on Nov. 5th, 2003:



Kibo Module



You can clearly see the "JPM/C2-09" label and the overall similarity.







Fig. 37 View showing EFU



The second image shows The JEM Exposed Facility (EF), and the port is an Exposed Facility Unit (EFU) used to dock experiments to the JEM-EF.



The EF can be seen in this schematic:



Kibo Schematic



Your confusion likely stems from the fact that the EFBM (Exposed Facility berthing Mechanism) is substantially smaller then the CBM which is used to dock Kibo to the ISS. Without a good scale reference in the cropped image, the module looks far bigger then it is.







share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 29 at 6:07

























answered May 28 at 10:34









PolygnomePolygnome

4,25219 silver badges33 bronze badges




4,25219 silver badges33 bronze badges















  • $begingroup$
    I am sorry i edited your answer, i will fix asap. Damn mobile app.
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 28 at 13:14










  • $begingroup$
    @OrganicMarble No worries, mistakes happen. I've rerolled the revision.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 28 at 13:19










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!!!!!!
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 28 at 13:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uhoh From the image description: "In the Space Station Processing Facility, the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM) rests on a workstand during pre-assembly measurement activities. Developed by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), the JEM will enhance the unique research capabilities of the orbiting complex by providing an additional environment for astronauts to conduct science experiments." Taken on 5th of November 2003.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 29 at 6:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uhoh I already edited that in directly after I made the comment, its the image description on wikipedia which the image is hyperlinked to. I am not entirely sure when the image in your document was taken, but if you look at the background (especially the black panels and the green-ish lower portion of the wall) it seems to be taken on the same stand, but from closer to the module making the angle steeper. I can not say when or in which facility the second of your images was taken, but logic would suggest the date is somewhat close together.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 29 at 9:02


















  • $begingroup$
    I am sorry i edited your answer, i will fix asap. Damn mobile app.
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 28 at 13:14










  • $begingroup$
    @OrganicMarble No worries, mistakes happen. I've rerolled the revision.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 28 at 13:19










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!!!!!!
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    May 28 at 13:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uhoh From the image description: "In the Space Station Processing Facility, the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM) rests on a workstand during pre-assembly measurement activities. Developed by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), the JEM will enhance the unique research capabilities of the orbiting complex by providing an additional environment for astronauts to conduct science experiments." Taken on 5th of November 2003.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 29 at 6:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uhoh I already edited that in directly after I made the comment, its the image description on wikipedia which the image is hyperlinked to. I am not entirely sure when the image in your document was taken, but if you look at the background (especially the black panels and the green-ish lower portion of the wall) it seems to be taken on the same stand, but from closer to the module making the angle steeper. I can not say when or in which facility the second of your images was taken, but logic would suggest the date is somewhat close together.
    $endgroup$
    – Polygnome
    May 29 at 9:02
















$begingroup$
I am sorry i edited your answer, i will fix asap. Damn mobile app.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 28 at 13:14




$begingroup$
I am sorry i edited your answer, i will fix asap. Damn mobile app.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 28 at 13:14












$begingroup$
@OrganicMarble No worries, mistakes happen. I've rerolled the revision.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 28 at 13:19




$begingroup$
@OrganicMarble No worries, mistakes happen. I've rerolled the revision.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 28 at 13:19












$begingroup$
Thank you!!!!!!
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 28 at 13:23




$begingroup$
Thank you!!!!!!
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 28 at 13:23




1




1




$begingroup$
@uhoh From the image description: "In the Space Station Processing Facility, the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM) rests on a workstand during pre-assembly measurement activities. Developed by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), the JEM will enhance the unique research capabilities of the orbiting complex by providing an additional environment for astronauts to conduct science experiments." Taken on 5th of November 2003.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 29 at 6:06




$begingroup$
@uhoh From the image description: "In the Space Station Processing Facility, the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM) rests on a workstand during pre-assembly measurement activities. Developed by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), the JEM will enhance the unique research capabilities of the orbiting complex by providing an additional environment for astronauts to conduct science experiments." Taken on 5th of November 2003.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 29 at 6:06




1




1




$begingroup$
@uhoh I already edited that in directly after I made the comment, its the image description on wikipedia which the image is hyperlinked to. I am not entirely sure when the image in your document was taken, but if you look at the background (especially the black panels and the green-ish lower portion of the wall) it seems to be taken on the same stand, but from closer to the module making the angle steeper. I can not say when or in which facility the second of your images was taken, but logic would suggest the date is somewhat close together.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 29 at 9:02




$begingroup$
@uhoh I already edited that in directly after I made the comment, its the image description on wikipedia which the image is hyperlinked to. I am not entirely sure when the image in your document was taken, but if you look at the background (especially the black panels and the green-ish lower portion of the wall) it seems to be taken on the same stand, but from closer to the module making the angle steeper. I can not say when or in which facility the second of your images was taken, but logic would suggest the date is somewhat close together.
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 29 at 9:02



















draft saved

draft discarded



















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36438%2fwhat-are-these-giant-nasa-boxes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029