Unattended/Unattended to?












1















I don't understand why we use "unattended to" instead of "unattended" in these examples.




1-Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
and unattended to?



2-Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbour, but leaves
oil spills unattended to.



3-Please do not leave your luggage unattended.











share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Because they have different meanings. Attended to means "actively looked after", and Unattended to similarly. It doesn't say anything about whether there was somebody there, but it says that if they were, they didn't do whatever was needed. Unattended means "left alone".

    – Colin Fine
    17 hours ago













  • So there is a little nuance between them? I think "unattended to" covers the meaning of the "unattended".

    – Talha Özden
    16 hours ago













  • if it is unattended then it is probably unattended to as well - but not necessarily, because attend to does not necessarily require presence. IN some cases (probably not the ones in your question) it is possible to attend to something (do what is necessary to look after it) remotely; but it would then still be unattended. Really, they don't overlap.

    – Colin Fine
    16 hours ago
















1















I don't understand why we use "unattended to" instead of "unattended" in these examples.




1-Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
and unattended to?



2-Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbour, but leaves
oil spills unattended to.



3-Please do not leave your luggage unattended.











share|improve this question


















  • 1





    Because they have different meanings. Attended to means "actively looked after", and Unattended to similarly. It doesn't say anything about whether there was somebody there, but it says that if they were, they didn't do whatever was needed. Unattended means "left alone".

    – Colin Fine
    17 hours ago













  • So there is a little nuance between them? I think "unattended to" covers the meaning of the "unattended".

    – Talha Özden
    16 hours ago













  • if it is unattended then it is probably unattended to as well - but not necessarily, because attend to does not necessarily require presence. IN some cases (probably not the ones in your question) it is possible to attend to something (do what is necessary to look after it) remotely; but it would then still be unattended. Really, they don't overlap.

    – Colin Fine
    16 hours ago














1












1








1


0






I don't understand why we use "unattended to" instead of "unattended" in these examples.




1-Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
and unattended to?



2-Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbour, but leaves
oil spills unattended to.



3-Please do not leave your luggage unattended.











share|improve this question














I don't understand why we use "unattended to" instead of "unattended" in these examples.




1-Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
and unattended to?



2-Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbour, but leaves
oil spills unattended to.



3-Please do not leave your luggage unattended.








phrasal-verbs






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 17 hours ago









Talha ÖzdenTalha Özden

34017




34017








  • 1





    Because they have different meanings. Attended to means "actively looked after", and Unattended to similarly. It doesn't say anything about whether there was somebody there, but it says that if they were, they didn't do whatever was needed. Unattended means "left alone".

    – Colin Fine
    17 hours ago













  • So there is a little nuance between them? I think "unattended to" covers the meaning of the "unattended".

    – Talha Özden
    16 hours ago













  • if it is unattended then it is probably unattended to as well - but not necessarily, because attend to does not necessarily require presence. IN some cases (probably not the ones in your question) it is possible to attend to something (do what is necessary to look after it) remotely; but it would then still be unattended. Really, they don't overlap.

    – Colin Fine
    16 hours ago














  • 1





    Because they have different meanings. Attended to means "actively looked after", and Unattended to similarly. It doesn't say anything about whether there was somebody there, but it says that if they were, they didn't do whatever was needed. Unattended means "left alone".

    – Colin Fine
    17 hours ago













  • So there is a little nuance between them? I think "unattended to" covers the meaning of the "unattended".

    – Talha Özden
    16 hours ago













  • if it is unattended then it is probably unattended to as well - but not necessarily, because attend to does not necessarily require presence. IN some cases (probably not the ones in your question) it is possible to attend to something (do what is necessary to look after it) remotely; but it would then still be unattended. Really, they don't overlap.

    – Colin Fine
    16 hours ago








1




1





Because they have different meanings. Attended to means "actively looked after", and Unattended to similarly. It doesn't say anything about whether there was somebody there, but it says that if they were, they didn't do whatever was needed. Unattended means "left alone".

– Colin Fine
17 hours ago







Because they have different meanings. Attended to means "actively looked after", and Unattended to similarly. It doesn't say anything about whether there was somebody there, but it says that if they were, they didn't do whatever was needed. Unattended means "left alone".

– Colin Fine
17 hours ago















So there is a little nuance between them? I think "unattended to" covers the meaning of the "unattended".

– Talha Özden
16 hours ago







So there is a little nuance between them? I think "unattended to" covers the meaning of the "unattended".

– Talha Özden
16 hours ago















if it is unattended then it is probably unattended to as well - but not necessarily, because attend to does not necessarily require presence. IN some cases (probably not the ones in your question) it is possible to attend to something (do what is necessary to look after it) remotely; but it would then still be unattended. Really, they don't overlap.

– Colin Fine
16 hours ago





if it is unattended then it is probably unattended to as well - but not necessarily, because attend to does not necessarily require presence. IN some cases (probably not the ones in your question) it is possible to attend to something (do what is necessary to look after it) remotely; but it would then still be unattended. Really, they don't overlap.

– Colin Fine
16 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















3














Unattended is the complement of attended, and by the same token unattended to is the complement of attended to. To attend to something means to give it attention, to look after it, resolve it, clear it up, etc. as appropriate.



Thus, something that is not attended - does not have someone with it - is unattended, while something that has not been attended to is unattended to.



The "troubled youth", the question ponders, might simply not have been given the care that would have helped him. Shell doesn't clean up their oil spills, one quote alleges. The last one simply asks you to keep your luggage with you.






share|improve this answer

































    2














    If you look at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend , you will see a list of definitions under "transitive" and another list under "intransitive". "transitive" means it takes a direct object, while "intransitive" means that any object will be indirect, i.e. will have a a preposition. In the case of "attend", that preposition is usually "to". One of the intransitive definitions is "to be present with : ACCOMPANY", which is being used in the luggage case. The intransitive sense has definitions such as "to direct one's attention". There is also a meaning of "deal with" that isn't listed by this dictionary. These meanings fit the other cases you cite where "to" is used.






    share|improve this answer
























    • It is not related to my question but I wonder in merriam-webster both "attended to" and "attend" have the same meaning as "to pay attention". Can I use them interchangeably, "Attend the warning signals" or "Attend to the warning signals"

      – Talha Özden
      15 hours ago











    • I guess either one could theoretically be used in this context- merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend - transitive definition 2 and intransitive definition 3 both essentially mean “heed” or “pay attention to”. But I honestly would probably not use either one when talking about warning signals- somehow these commands both sound odd to me (maybe it’s a regional/dialect situation, I don’t know). If I had to pick one that sounded better to me in this context I’d probably go with “attend to”.

      – Mixolydian
      14 hours ago











    • @Mixolydian Thank you :)

      – Talha Özden
      12 hours ago



















    1














    The adjective unattended has primarily two meanings:




    1. Not noticed or paid attention to, or dealt with may be (yet is not quite often)*, followed by the preposition to:



    Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
    and unattended to?




    (Wasn't there anyone to attend [to notice or pay attention to] to the youth?)




    Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbor but leaves oil
    spills unattended to.




    (Shell claims that she is a good neighbor even if she doesn't attend [doesn't deal/take action with respect to] to the oil spills she leaves.)




    1. Not supervised or looked after (doesn't take the preposition to):



    Please do not leave your luggage unattended




    (Don't leave your luggage without your [or someone else's] supervision.)



    The sourse with examples of the usage.



    *In my opinion, the difference between the two meanings is very often too subtle in many scenarios.






    share|improve this answer































      0














      Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect uses of the intransitive verb "attend to"
      since both end sentences with a preposition; "to" in these instances.
      These are sentences that ought not to be written as they are.
      "Not given attention" would be a preferable construction in example 1 and "unremediated" would be preferable in example 2.



      Example 3 is a correct use of "unattended" as an adverb, the verb is "leave" in this instance.



      TL;DR Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect grammar which makes them difficult to understand. Two reasons;"unattended to" isn't the negation of "attended to", & sentences shouldn't end with "to".
      The difference in meaning between examples 1 & 2 and 3 is due to 1 & 2 using "unattended to" as a verb and 3 using "unattended" as an adverb.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      David Pawley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      • I think most native speakers don't really care about not finishing a sentence with a preposition that much.

        – Talha Özden
        11 hours ago











      • @talha They ought to.

        – David Pawley
        10 hours ago











      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "481"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202534%2funattended-unattended-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      Unattended is the complement of attended, and by the same token unattended to is the complement of attended to. To attend to something means to give it attention, to look after it, resolve it, clear it up, etc. as appropriate.



      Thus, something that is not attended - does not have someone with it - is unattended, while something that has not been attended to is unattended to.



      The "troubled youth", the question ponders, might simply not have been given the care that would have helped him. Shell doesn't clean up their oil spills, one quote alleges. The last one simply asks you to keep your luggage with you.






      share|improve this answer






























        3














        Unattended is the complement of attended, and by the same token unattended to is the complement of attended to. To attend to something means to give it attention, to look after it, resolve it, clear it up, etc. as appropriate.



        Thus, something that is not attended - does not have someone with it - is unattended, while something that has not been attended to is unattended to.



        The "troubled youth", the question ponders, might simply not have been given the care that would have helped him. Shell doesn't clean up their oil spills, one quote alleges. The last one simply asks you to keep your luggage with you.






        share|improve this answer




























          3












          3








          3







          Unattended is the complement of attended, and by the same token unattended to is the complement of attended to. To attend to something means to give it attention, to look after it, resolve it, clear it up, etc. as appropriate.



          Thus, something that is not attended - does not have someone with it - is unattended, while something that has not been attended to is unattended to.



          The "troubled youth", the question ponders, might simply not have been given the care that would have helped him. Shell doesn't clean up their oil spills, one quote alleges. The last one simply asks you to keep your luggage with you.






          share|improve this answer















          Unattended is the complement of attended, and by the same token unattended to is the complement of attended to. To attend to something means to give it attention, to look after it, resolve it, clear it up, etc. as appropriate.



          Thus, something that is not attended - does not have someone with it - is unattended, while something that has not been attended to is unattended to.



          The "troubled youth", the question ponders, might simply not have been given the care that would have helped him. Shell doesn't clean up their oil spills, one quote alleges. The last one simply asks you to keep your luggage with you.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 16 hours ago

























          answered 16 hours ago









          SamBCSamBC

          14.8k1958




          14.8k1958

























              2














              If you look at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend , you will see a list of definitions under "transitive" and another list under "intransitive". "transitive" means it takes a direct object, while "intransitive" means that any object will be indirect, i.e. will have a a preposition. In the case of "attend", that preposition is usually "to". One of the intransitive definitions is "to be present with : ACCOMPANY", which is being used in the luggage case. The intransitive sense has definitions such as "to direct one's attention". There is also a meaning of "deal with" that isn't listed by this dictionary. These meanings fit the other cases you cite where "to" is used.






              share|improve this answer
























              • It is not related to my question but I wonder in merriam-webster both "attended to" and "attend" have the same meaning as "to pay attention". Can I use them interchangeably, "Attend the warning signals" or "Attend to the warning signals"

                – Talha Özden
                15 hours ago











              • I guess either one could theoretically be used in this context- merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend - transitive definition 2 and intransitive definition 3 both essentially mean “heed” or “pay attention to”. But I honestly would probably not use either one when talking about warning signals- somehow these commands both sound odd to me (maybe it’s a regional/dialect situation, I don’t know). If I had to pick one that sounded better to me in this context I’d probably go with “attend to”.

                – Mixolydian
                14 hours ago











              • @Mixolydian Thank you :)

                – Talha Özden
                12 hours ago
















              2














              If you look at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend , you will see a list of definitions under "transitive" and another list under "intransitive". "transitive" means it takes a direct object, while "intransitive" means that any object will be indirect, i.e. will have a a preposition. In the case of "attend", that preposition is usually "to". One of the intransitive definitions is "to be present with : ACCOMPANY", which is being used in the luggage case. The intransitive sense has definitions such as "to direct one's attention". There is also a meaning of "deal with" that isn't listed by this dictionary. These meanings fit the other cases you cite where "to" is used.






              share|improve this answer
























              • It is not related to my question but I wonder in merriam-webster both "attended to" and "attend" have the same meaning as "to pay attention". Can I use them interchangeably, "Attend the warning signals" or "Attend to the warning signals"

                – Talha Özden
                15 hours ago











              • I guess either one could theoretically be used in this context- merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend - transitive definition 2 and intransitive definition 3 both essentially mean “heed” or “pay attention to”. But I honestly would probably not use either one when talking about warning signals- somehow these commands both sound odd to me (maybe it’s a regional/dialect situation, I don’t know). If I had to pick one that sounded better to me in this context I’d probably go with “attend to”.

                – Mixolydian
                14 hours ago











              • @Mixolydian Thank you :)

                – Talha Özden
                12 hours ago














              2












              2








              2







              If you look at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend , you will see a list of definitions under "transitive" and another list under "intransitive". "transitive" means it takes a direct object, while "intransitive" means that any object will be indirect, i.e. will have a a preposition. In the case of "attend", that preposition is usually "to". One of the intransitive definitions is "to be present with : ACCOMPANY", which is being used in the luggage case. The intransitive sense has definitions such as "to direct one's attention". There is also a meaning of "deal with" that isn't listed by this dictionary. These meanings fit the other cases you cite where "to" is used.






              share|improve this answer













              If you look at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend , you will see a list of definitions under "transitive" and another list under "intransitive". "transitive" means it takes a direct object, while "intransitive" means that any object will be indirect, i.e. will have a a preposition. In the case of "attend", that preposition is usually "to". One of the intransitive definitions is "to be present with : ACCOMPANY", which is being used in the luggage case. The intransitive sense has definitions such as "to direct one's attention". There is also a meaning of "deal with" that isn't listed by this dictionary. These meanings fit the other cases you cite where "to" is used.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 16 hours ago









              AcccumulationAcccumulation

              1,67317




              1,67317













              • It is not related to my question but I wonder in merriam-webster both "attended to" and "attend" have the same meaning as "to pay attention". Can I use them interchangeably, "Attend the warning signals" or "Attend to the warning signals"

                – Talha Özden
                15 hours ago











              • I guess either one could theoretically be used in this context- merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend - transitive definition 2 and intransitive definition 3 both essentially mean “heed” or “pay attention to”. But I honestly would probably not use either one when talking about warning signals- somehow these commands both sound odd to me (maybe it’s a regional/dialect situation, I don’t know). If I had to pick one that sounded better to me in this context I’d probably go with “attend to”.

                – Mixolydian
                14 hours ago











              • @Mixolydian Thank you :)

                – Talha Özden
                12 hours ago



















              • It is not related to my question but I wonder in merriam-webster both "attended to" and "attend" have the same meaning as "to pay attention". Can I use them interchangeably, "Attend the warning signals" or "Attend to the warning signals"

                – Talha Özden
                15 hours ago











              • I guess either one could theoretically be used in this context- merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend - transitive definition 2 and intransitive definition 3 both essentially mean “heed” or “pay attention to”. But I honestly would probably not use either one when talking about warning signals- somehow these commands both sound odd to me (maybe it’s a regional/dialect situation, I don’t know). If I had to pick one that sounded better to me in this context I’d probably go with “attend to”.

                – Mixolydian
                14 hours ago











              • @Mixolydian Thank you :)

                – Talha Özden
                12 hours ago

















              It is not related to my question but I wonder in merriam-webster both "attended to" and "attend" have the same meaning as "to pay attention". Can I use them interchangeably, "Attend the warning signals" or "Attend to the warning signals"

              – Talha Özden
              15 hours ago





              It is not related to my question but I wonder in merriam-webster both "attended to" and "attend" have the same meaning as "to pay attention". Can I use them interchangeably, "Attend the warning signals" or "Attend to the warning signals"

              – Talha Özden
              15 hours ago













              I guess either one could theoretically be used in this context- merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend - transitive definition 2 and intransitive definition 3 both essentially mean “heed” or “pay attention to”. But I honestly would probably not use either one when talking about warning signals- somehow these commands both sound odd to me (maybe it’s a regional/dialect situation, I don’t know). If I had to pick one that sounded better to me in this context I’d probably go with “attend to”.

              – Mixolydian
              14 hours ago





              I guess either one could theoretically be used in this context- merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attend - transitive definition 2 and intransitive definition 3 both essentially mean “heed” or “pay attention to”. But I honestly would probably not use either one when talking about warning signals- somehow these commands both sound odd to me (maybe it’s a regional/dialect situation, I don’t know). If I had to pick one that sounded better to me in this context I’d probably go with “attend to”.

              – Mixolydian
              14 hours ago













              @Mixolydian Thank you :)

              – Talha Özden
              12 hours ago





              @Mixolydian Thank you :)

              – Talha Özden
              12 hours ago











              1














              The adjective unattended has primarily two meanings:




              1. Not noticed or paid attention to, or dealt with may be (yet is not quite often)*, followed by the preposition to:



              Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
              and unattended to?




              (Wasn't there anyone to attend [to notice or pay attention to] to the youth?)




              Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbor but leaves oil
              spills unattended to.




              (Shell claims that she is a good neighbor even if she doesn't attend [doesn't deal/take action with respect to] to the oil spills she leaves.)




              1. Not supervised or looked after (doesn't take the preposition to):



              Please do not leave your luggage unattended




              (Don't leave your luggage without your [or someone else's] supervision.)



              The sourse with examples of the usage.



              *In my opinion, the difference between the two meanings is very often too subtle in many scenarios.






              share|improve this answer




























                1














                The adjective unattended has primarily two meanings:




                1. Not noticed or paid attention to, or dealt with may be (yet is not quite often)*, followed by the preposition to:



                Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
                and unattended to?




                (Wasn't there anyone to attend [to notice or pay attention to] to the youth?)




                Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbor but leaves oil
                spills unattended to.




                (Shell claims that she is a good neighbor even if she doesn't attend [doesn't deal/take action with respect to] to the oil spills she leaves.)




                1. Not supervised or looked after (doesn't take the preposition to):



                Please do not leave your luggage unattended




                (Don't leave your luggage without your [or someone else's] supervision.)



                The sourse with examples of the usage.



                *In my opinion, the difference between the two meanings is very often too subtle in many scenarios.






                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  The adjective unattended has primarily two meanings:




                  1. Not noticed or paid attention to, or dealt with may be (yet is not quite often)*, followed by the preposition to:



                  Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
                  and unattended to?




                  (Wasn't there anyone to attend [to notice or pay attention to] to the youth?)




                  Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbor but leaves oil
                  spills unattended to.




                  (Shell claims that she is a good neighbor even if she doesn't attend [doesn't deal/take action with respect to] to the oil spills she leaves.)




                  1. Not supervised or looked after (doesn't take the preposition to):



                  Please do not leave your luggage unattended




                  (Don't leave your luggage without your [or someone else's] supervision.)



                  The sourse with examples of the usage.



                  *In my opinion, the difference between the two meanings is very often too subtle in many scenarios.






                  share|improve this answer













                  The adjective unattended has primarily two meanings:




                  1. Not noticed or paid attention to, or dealt with may be (yet is not quite often)*, followed by the preposition to:



                  Is a gunman 20 years-old simply a troubled youth who got overlooked
                  and unattended to?




                  (Wasn't there anyone to attend [to notice or pay attention to] to the youth?)




                  Shell, says the report, claims to be a good neighbor but leaves oil
                  spills unattended to.




                  (Shell claims that she is a good neighbor even if she doesn't attend [doesn't deal/take action with respect to] to the oil spills she leaves.)




                  1. Not supervised or looked after (doesn't take the preposition to):



                  Please do not leave your luggage unattended




                  (Don't leave your luggage without your [or someone else's] supervision.)



                  The sourse with examples of the usage.



                  *In my opinion, the difference between the two meanings is very often too subtle in many scenarios.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 12 hours ago









                  RompeyRompey

                  6,58522365




                  6,58522365























                      0














                      Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect uses of the intransitive verb "attend to"
                      since both end sentences with a preposition; "to" in these instances.
                      These are sentences that ought not to be written as they are.
                      "Not given attention" would be a preferable construction in example 1 and "unremediated" would be preferable in example 2.



                      Example 3 is a correct use of "unattended" as an adverb, the verb is "leave" in this instance.



                      TL;DR Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect grammar which makes them difficult to understand. Two reasons;"unattended to" isn't the negation of "attended to", & sentences shouldn't end with "to".
                      The difference in meaning between examples 1 & 2 and 3 is due to 1 & 2 using "unattended to" as a verb and 3 using "unattended" as an adverb.






                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor




                      David Pawley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                      • I think most native speakers don't really care about not finishing a sentence with a preposition that much.

                        – Talha Özden
                        11 hours ago











                      • @talha They ought to.

                        – David Pawley
                        10 hours ago
















                      0














                      Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect uses of the intransitive verb "attend to"
                      since both end sentences with a preposition; "to" in these instances.
                      These are sentences that ought not to be written as they are.
                      "Not given attention" would be a preferable construction in example 1 and "unremediated" would be preferable in example 2.



                      Example 3 is a correct use of "unattended" as an adverb, the verb is "leave" in this instance.



                      TL;DR Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect grammar which makes them difficult to understand. Two reasons;"unattended to" isn't the negation of "attended to", & sentences shouldn't end with "to".
                      The difference in meaning between examples 1 & 2 and 3 is due to 1 & 2 using "unattended to" as a verb and 3 using "unattended" as an adverb.






                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor




                      David Pawley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                      • I think most native speakers don't really care about not finishing a sentence with a preposition that much.

                        – Talha Özden
                        11 hours ago











                      • @talha They ought to.

                        – David Pawley
                        10 hours ago














                      0












                      0








                      0







                      Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect uses of the intransitive verb "attend to"
                      since both end sentences with a preposition; "to" in these instances.
                      These are sentences that ought not to be written as they are.
                      "Not given attention" would be a preferable construction in example 1 and "unremediated" would be preferable in example 2.



                      Example 3 is a correct use of "unattended" as an adverb, the verb is "leave" in this instance.



                      TL;DR Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect grammar which makes them difficult to understand. Two reasons;"unattended to" isn't the negation of "attended to", & sentences shouldn't end with "to".
                      The difference in meaning between examples 1 & 2 and 3 is due to 1 & 2 using "unattended to" as a verb and 3 using "unattended" as an adverb.






                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor




                      David Pawley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.










                      Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect uses of the intransitive verb "attend to"
                      since both end sentences with a preposition; "to" in these instances.
                      These are sentences that ought not to be written as they are.
                      "Not given attention" would be a preferable construction in example 1 and "unremediated" would be preferable in example 2.



                      Example 3 is a correct use of "unattended" as an adverb, the verb is "leave" in this instance.



                      TL;DR Examples 1 & 2 are incorrect grammar which makes them difficult to understand. Two reasons;"unattended to" isn't the negation of "attended to", & sentences shouldn't end with "to".
                      The difference in meaning between examples 1 & 2 and 3 is due to 1 & 2 using "unattended to" as a verb and 3 using "unattended" as an adverb.







                      share|improve this answer










                      New contributor




                      David Pawley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 5 hours ago





















                      New contributor




                      David Pawley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      answered 11 hours ago









                      David PawleyDavid Pawley

                      11




                      11




                      New contributor




                      David Pawley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      New contributor





                      David Pawley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      David Pawley is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.













                      • I think most native speakers don't really care about not finishing a sentence with a preposition that much.

                        – Talha Özden
                        11 hours ago











                      • @talha They ought to.

                        – David Pawley
                        10 hours ago



















                      • I think most native speakers don't really care about not finishing a sentence with a preposition that much.

                        – Talha Özden
                        11 hours ago











                      • @talha They ought to.

                        – David Pawley
                        10 hours ago

















                      I think most native speakers don't really care about not finishing a sentence with a preposition that much.

                      – Talha Özden
                      11 hours ago





                      I think most native speakers don't really care about not finishing a sentence with a preposition that much.

                      – Talha Özden
                      11 hours ago













                      @talha They ought to.

                      – David Pawley
                      10 hours ago





                      @talha They ought to.

                      – David Pawley
                      10 hours ago


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202534%2funattended-unattended-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                      He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                      Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029