Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1












$begingroup$


Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.



(just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)










share|improve this question









$endgroup$



















    1












    $begingroup$


    Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.



    (just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.



      (just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.



      (just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)







      series






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 30 at 10:58









      InTheMoodForNowInTheMoodForNow

      203




      203






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$


          Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




          This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



          There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.




          • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

          • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

          • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

          • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

          • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

          • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.


          Yes/No/Maybe



          That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



          What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

          Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

          Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

          Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

          What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

          What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

          What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for this!
            $endgroup$
            – InTheMoodForNow
            Mar 30 at 16:40



















          3












          $begingroup$

          It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



          Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




          [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




          Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



          Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



          In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
            $endgroup$
            – HandyHowie
            Mar 30 at 13:35










          • $begingroup$
            That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
            $endgroup$
            – Transistor
            Mar 30 at 13:48



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
          As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
            StackExchange.schematics.init();
            });
            }, "cicuitlab");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "135"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f429801%2fis-there-a-way-to-bypass-a-component-in-series-in-a-circuit-if-that-component-fa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$


            Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




            This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



            There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.




            • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

            • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

            • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

            • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

            • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

            • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.


            Yes/No/Maybe



            That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



            What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

            Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

            Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

            Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

            What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

            What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

            What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this!
              $endgroup$
              – InTheMoodForNow
              Mar 30 at 16:40
















            3












            $begingroup$


            Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




            This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



            There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.




            • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

            • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

            • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

            • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

            • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

            • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.


            Yes/No/Maybe



            That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



            What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

            Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

            Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

            Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

            What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

            What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

            What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this!
              $endgroup$
              – InTheMoodForNow
              Mar 30 at 16:40














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$


            Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




            This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



            There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.




            • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

            • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

            • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

            • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

            • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

            • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.


            Yes/No/Maybe



            That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



            What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

            Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

            Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

            Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

            What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

            What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

            What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




            Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




            This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



            There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.




            • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

            • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

            • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

            • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

            • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

            • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.


            Yes/No/Maybe



            That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



            What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

            Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

            Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

            Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

            What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

            What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

            What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Mar 30 at 16:38









            Sunnyskyguy EE75Sunnyskyguy EE75

            70.7k226103




            70.7k226103












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this!
              $endgroup$
              – InTheMoodForNow
              Mar 30 at 16:40


















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this!
              $endgroup$
              – InTheMoodForNow
              Mar 30 at 16:40
















            $begingroup$
            Thank you for this!
            $endgroup$
            – InTheMoodForNow
            Mar 30 at 16:40




            $begingroup$
            Thank you for this!
            $endgroup$
            – InTheMoodForNow
            Mar 30 at 16:40













            3












            $begingroup$

            It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



            Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




            [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




            Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



            Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



            In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
              $endgroup$
              – HandyHowie
              Mar 30 at 13:35










            • $begingroup$
              That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
              $endgroup$
              – Transistor
              Mar 30 at 13:48
















            3












            $begingroup$

            It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



            Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




            [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




            Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



            Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



            In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
              $endgroup$
              – HandyHowie
              Mar 30 at 13:35










            • $begingroup$
              That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
              $endgroup$
              – Transistor
              Mar 30 at 13:48














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



            Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




            [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




            Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



            Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



            In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



            Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




            [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




            Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



            Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



            In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Mar 30 at 11:21









            TransistorTransistor

            88.4k785189




            88.4k785189












            • $begingroup$
              In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
              $endgroup$
              – HandyHowie
              Mar 30 at 13:35










            • $begingroup$
              That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
              $endgroup$
              – Transistor
              Mar 30 at 13:48


















            • $begingroup$
              In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
              $endgroup$
              – HandyHowie
              Mar 30 at 13:35










            • $begingroup$
              That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
              $endgroup$
              – Transistor
              Mar 30 at 13:48
















            $begingroup$
            In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
            $endgroup$
            – HandyHowie
            Mar 30 at 13:35




            $begingroup$
            In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
            $endgroup$
            – HandyHowie
            Mar 30 at 13:35












            $begingroup$
            That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
            $endgroup$
            – Transistor
            Mar 30 at 13:48




            $begingroup$
            That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
            $endgroup$
            – Transistor
            Mar 30 at 13:48











            1












            $begingroup$

            Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
            As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
              As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
                As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
                As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Mar 30 at 20:35

























                answered Mar 30 at 11:11









                Sim SonSim Son

                12310




                12310






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f429801%2fis-there-a-way-to-bypass-a-component-in-series-in-a-circuit-if-that-component-fa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                    He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                    Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029