Term for limitless temporal scope of digital information [closed]A term for providing irrelevant and hiding relevant informationSingle adjective for containing a lot of text (digital)Words describing relation to scopeWord for “assembling information”?Word for the opposite of digital artIs there an equivalent term for 'size' to go with 'spatial' and 'temporal'Temporal adjective for “As old as time itself”?Modern term for 'overwhelming information onslaught'A word for “useful information”?How to use term describe `out of scope` job, but it is a company tasks

Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?

Service Entrance Breakers Rain Shield

How to format long polynomial?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

Problem of parity - Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments...

Do VLANs within a subnet need to have their own subnet for router on a stick?

What are the differences between the usage of 'it' and 'they'?

Today is the Center

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

the place where lots of roads meet

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

Dragon forelimb placement

How do I create uniquely male characters?

Show that if two triangles built on parallel lines, with equal bases have the same perimeter only if they are congruent.

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free

How does strength of boric acid solution increase in presence of salicylic acid?

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

Can divisibility rules for digits be generalized to sum of digits

What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?



Term for limitless temporal scope of digital information [closed]


A term for providing irrelevant and hiding relevant informationSingle adjective for containing a lot of text (digital)Words describing relation to scopeWord for “assembling information”?Word for the opposite of digital artIs there an equivalent term for 'size' to go with 'spatial' and 'temporal'Temporal adjective for “As old as time itself”?Modern term for 'overwhelming information onslaught'A word for “useful information”?How to use term describe `out of scope` job, but it is a company tasks






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0















Social media and digital information storage together have created a new kind of archive in which even arcane details of individuals' behaviour and attitudes cannot easily be forgotten or erased.



What is the best term to describe the limitless temporal scope of contemporary digital information? A term that expresses not only how digital records simply amass, but also how the digital archive is persistent/everlasting.



My digital footprint is ???










share|improve this question















closed as off-topic by FumbleFingers, TrevorD, Ubi hatt, JJJ, tchrist Mar 24 at 16:01


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – FumbleFingers, TrevorD, Ubi hatt, JJJ, tchrist
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 4





    limitless temporal scope = eternal

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 22 at 12:31






  • 1





    There are alternatives - ageless, for example. Or to borrow a term from modern cosmology, temporally unbounded.

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 22 at 13:27







  • 1





    @FumbleFingers Please don't answer questions in comments. Any or all of those would be an answer.

    – DJClayworth
    Mar 22 at 13:56






  • 1





    @DJClayworth: I voted to close the question, so on principle I wouldn't want to answer. I just didn't want to leave the OP thinking the only available answer was "omnitemporal" below (now changed to reflect my first suggestion above).

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 22 at 14:21






  • 2





    The problem with offering answers to off-topic questions in comments is that people get used to the idea that they will get an answer if they post a question here, even if it is off topic. So they keep posting off topic questions.

    – DJClayworth
    Mar 22 at 15:06

















0















Social media and digital information storage together have created a new kind of archive in which even arcane details of individuals' behaviour and attitudes cannot easily be forgotten or erased.



What is the best term to describe the limitless temporal scope of contemporary digital information? A term that expresses not only how digital records simply amass, but also how the digital archive is persistent/everlasting.



My digital footprint is ???










share|improve this question















closed as off-topic by FumbleFingers, TrevorD, Ubi hatt, JJJ, tchrist Mar 24 at 16:01


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – FumbleFingers, TrevorD, Ubi hatt, JJJ, tchrist
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 4





    limitless temporal scope = eternal

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 22 at 12:31






  • 1





    There are alternatives - ageless, for example. Or to borrow a term from modern cosmology, temporally unbounded.

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 22 at 13:27







  • 1





    @FumbleFingers Please don't answer questions in comments. Any or all of those would be an answer.

    – DJClayworth
    Mar 22 at 13:56






  • 1





    @DJClayworth: I voted to close the question, so on principle I wouldn't want to answer. I just didn't want to leave the OP thinking the only available answer was "omnitemporal" below (now changed to reflect my first suggestion above).

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 22 at 14:21






  • 2





    The problem with offering answers to off-topic questions in comments is that people get used to the idea that they will get an answer if they post a question here, even if it is off topic. So they keep posting off topic questions.

    – DJClayworth
    Mar 22 at 15:06













0












0








0








Social media and digital information storage together have created a new kind of archive in which even arcane details of individuals' behaviour and attitudes cannot easily be forgotten or erased.



What is the best term to describe the limitless temporal scope of contemporary digital information? A term that expresses not only how digital records simply amass, but also how the digital archive is persistent/everlasting.



My digital footprint is ???










share|improve this question
















Social media and digital information storage together have created a new kind of archive in which even arcane details of individuals' behaviour and attitudes cannot easily be forgotten or erased.



What is the best term to describe the limitless temporal scope of contemporary digital information? A term that expresses not only how digital records simply amass, but also how the digital archive is persistent/everlasting.



My digital footprint is ???







single-word-requests






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 23 at 17:23







Dan

















asked Mar 22 at 11:57









DanDan

15.6k32561




15.6k32561




closed as off-topic by FumbleFingers, TrevorD, Ubi hatt, JJJ, tchrist Mar 24 at 16:01


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – FumbleFingers, TrevorD, Ubi hatt, JJJ, tchrist
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by FumbleFingers, TrevorD, Ubi hatt, JJJ, tchrist Mar 24 at 16:01


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – FumbleFingers, TrevorD, Ubi hatt, JJJ, tchrist
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 4





    limitless temporal scope = eternal

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 22 at 12:31






  • 1





    There are alternatives - ageless, for example. Or to borrow a term from modern cosmology, temporally unbounded.

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 22 at 13:27







  • 1





    @FumbleFingers Please don't answer questions in comments. Any or all of those would be an answer.

    – DJClayworth
    Mar 22 at 13:56






  • 1





    @DJClayworth: I voted to close the question, so on principle I wouldn't want to answer. I just didn't want to leave the OP thinking the only available answer was "omnitemporal" below (now changed to reflect my first suggestion above).

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 22 at 14:21






  • 2





    The problem with offering answers to off-topic questions in comments is that people get used to the idea that they will get an answer if they post a question here, even if it is off topic. So they keep posting off topic questions.

    – DJClayworth
    Mar 22 at 15:06












  • 4





    limitless temporal scope = eternal

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 22 at 12:31






  • 1





    There are alternatives - ageless, for example. Or to borrow a term from modern cosmology, temporally unbounded.

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 22 at 13:27







  • 1





    @FumbleFingers Please don't answer questions in comments. Any or all of those would be an answer.

    – DJClayworth
    Mar 22 at 13:56






  • 1





    @DJClayworth: I voted to close the question, so on principle I wouldn't want to answer. I just didn't want to leave the OP thinking the only available answer was "omnitemporal" below (now changed to reflect my first suggestion above).

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 22 at 14:21






  • 2





    The problem with offering answers to off-topic questions in comments is that people get used to the idea that they will get an answer if they post a question here, even if it is off topic. So they keep posting off topic questions.

    – DJClayworth
    Mar 22 at 15:06







4




4





limitless temporal scope = eternal

– FumbleFingers
Mar 22 at 12:31





limitless temporal scope = eternal

– FumbleFingers
Mar 22 at 12:31




1




1





There are alternatives - ageless, for example. Or to borrow a term from modern cosmology, temporally unbounded.

– FumbleFingers
Mar 22 at 13:27






There are alternatives - ageless, for example. Or to borrow a term from modern cosmology, temporally unbounded.

– FumbleFingers
Mar 22 at 13:27





1




1





@FumbleFingers Please don't answer questions in comments. Any or all of those would be an answer.

– DJClayworth
Mar 22 at 13:56





@FumbleFingers Please don't answer questions in comments. Any or all of those would be an answer.

– DJClayworth
Mar 22 at 13:56




1




1





@DJClayworth: I voted to close the question, so on principle I wouldn't want to answer. I just didn't want to leave the OP thinking the only available answer was "omnitemporal" below (now changed to reflect my first suggestion above).

– FumbleFingers
Mar 22 at 14:21





@DJClayworth: I voted to close the question, so on principle I wouldn't want to answer. I just didn't want to leave the OP thinking the only available answer was "omnitemporal" below (now changed to reflect my first suggestion above).

– FumbleFingers
Mar 22 at 14:21




2




2





The problem with offering answers to off-topic questions in comments is that people get used to the idea that they will get an answer if they post a question here, even if it is off topic. So they keep posting off topic questions.

– DJClayworth
Mar 22 at 15:06





The problem with offering answers to off-topic questions in comments is that people get used to the idea that they will get an answer if they post a question here, even if it is off topic. So they keep posting off topic questions.

– DJClayworth
Mar 22 at 15:06










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














From the standpoint of “cannot be erased” is the option




indelible



that cannot be eliminated, forgotten, changed, or the like:
the indelible memories of war; the indelible influence of a great teacher.



Dictionary.com







share|improve this answer























  • Thanks - a very good suggestion! I like how it nods not only at 'everlasting' but also at the irremovability of digital information. I also like the fact that its religious associations are minimal! Very strong contender for green tick...

    – Dan
    Mar 23 at 17:20



















0














Eternal. Oxford Dictionaries:




  1. Lasting or existing forever; without end.



Eternal comes from the Latin aeternus, and is commonly used to refer to timelessness.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    That's kind of a far out term (what is its frequency?) when the very normal 'eternal' already exists.

    – Mitch
    Mar 22 at 13:01






  • 1





    But fine. I change my answer to eternal.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    Mar 22 at 13:59

















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














From the standpoint of “cannot be erased” is the option




indelible



that cannot be eliminated, forgotten, changed, or the like:
the indelible memories of war; the indelible influence of a great teacher.



Dictionary.com







share|improve this answer























  • Thanks - a very good suggestion! I like how it nods not only at 'everlasting' but also at the irremovability of digital information. I also like the fact that its religious associations are minimal! Very strong contender for green tick...

    – Dan
    Mar 23 at 17:20
















2














From the standpoint of “cannot be erased” is the option




indelible



that cannot be eliminated, forgotten, changed, or the like:
the indelible memories of war; the indelible influence of a great teacher.



Dictionary.com







share|improve this answer























  • Thanks - a very good suggestion! I like how it nods not only at 'everlasting' but also at the irremovability of digital information. I also like the fact that its religious associations are minimal! Very strong contender for green tick...

    – Dan
    Mar 23 at 17:20














2












2








2







From the standpoint of “cannot be erased” is the option




indelible



that cannot be eliminated, forgotten, changed, or the like:
the indelible memories of war; the indelible influence of a great teacher.



Dictionary.com







share|improve this answer













From the standpoint of “cannot be erased” is the option




indelible



that cannot be eliminated, forgotten, changed, or the like:
the indelible memories of war; the indelible influence of a great teacher.



Dictionary.com








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 22 at 17:16









JimJim

30.3k862115




30.3k862115












  • Thanks - a very good suggestion! I like how it nods not only at 'everlasting' but also at the irremovability of digital information. I also like the fact that its religious associations are minimal! Very strong contender for green tick...

    – Dan
    Mar 23 at 17:20


















  • Thanks - a very good suggestion! I like how it nods not only at 'everlasting' but also at the irremovability of digital information. I also like the fact that its religious associations are minimal! Very strong contender for green tick...

    – Dan
    Mar 23 at 17:20

















Thanks - a very good suggestion! I like how it nods not only at 'everlasting' but also at the irremovability of digital information. I also like the fact that its religious associations are minimal! Very strong contender for green tick...

– Dan
Mar 23 at 17:20






Thanks - a very good suggestion! I like how it nods not only at 'everlasting' but also at the irremovability of digital information. I also like the fact that its religious associations are minimal! Very strong contender for green tick...

– Dan
Mar 23 at 17:20














0














Eternal. Oxford Dictionaries:




  1. Lasting or existing forever; without end.



Eternal comes from the Latin aeternus, and is commonly used to refer to timelessness.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    That's kind of a far out term (what is its frequency?) when the very normal 'eternal' already exists.

    – Mitch
    Mar 22 at 13:01






  • 1





    But fine. I change my answer to eternal.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    Mar 22 at 13:59















0














Eternal. Oxford Dictionaries:




  1. Lasting or existing forever; without end.



Eternal comes from the Latin aeternus, and is commonly used to refer to timelessness.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    That's kind of a far out term (what is its frequency?) when the very normal 'eternal' already exists.

    – Mitch
    Mar 22 at 13:01






  • 1





    But fine. I change my answer to eternal.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    Mar 22 at 13:59













0












0








0







Eternal. Oxford Dictionaries:




  1. Lasting or existing forever; without end.



Eternal comes from the Latin aeternus, and is commonly used to refer to timelessness.






share|improve this answer















Eternal. Oxford Dictionaries:




  1. Lasting or existing forever; without end.



Eternal comes from the Latin aeternus, and is commonly used to refer to timelessness.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 22 at 14:01

























answered Mar 22 at 12:33









TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin

6,8471329




6,8471329







  • 1





    That's kind of a far out term (what is its frequency?) when the very normal 'eternal' already exists.

    – Mitch
    Mar 22 at 13:01






  • 1





    But fine. I change my answer to eternal.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    Mar 22 at 13:59












  • 1





    That's kind of a far out term (what is its frequency?) when the very normal 'eternal' already exists.

    – Mitch
    Mar 22 at 13:01






  • 1





    But fine. I change my answer to eternal.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    Mar 22 at 13:59







1




1





That's kind of a far out term (what is its frequency?) when the very normal 'eternal' already exists.

– Mitch
Mar 22 at 13:01





That's kind of a far out term (what is its frequency?) when the very normal 'eternal' already exists.

– Mitch
Mar 22 at 13:01




1




1





But fine. I change my answer to eternal.

– TaliesinMerlin
Mar 22 at 13:59





But fine. I change my answer to eternal.

– TaliesinMerlin
Mar 22 at 13:59



Popular posts from this blog

Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029