Delta TSA-Precheck status removed





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







8















For the longest time: Delta had me running the gauntlet as Precheck. Today we were demoted to the standard inspection. The airline representative indicated that the decision was driven by TSA and has been applied to a number of passengers.



Given that TSA has incentive (they are resource constrained) to expedite travelers as Pre-Check, what possible cause would they have to revert Pre-Check passengers to standard status?










share|improve this question




















  • 8





    Have you paid the Pre-Check program fees and gone through that prescreening interview process?

    – WBT
    May 10 at 18:58








  • 5





    It's not entirely clear whether you just happened to be getting "upgraded" to TSA Pre-Check a lot and now you didn't on a recent flight or if you were actually part of the Pre-Check program and happened to get downgraded this time.

    – Herohtar
    May 10 at 19:17


















8















For the longest time: Delta had me running the gauntlet as Precheck. Today we were demoted to the standard inspection. The airline representative indicated that the decision was driven by TSA and has been applied to a number of passengers.



Given that TSA has incentive (they are resource constrained) to expedite travelers as Pre-Check, what possible cause would they have to revert Pre-Check passengers to standard status?










share|improve this question




















  • 8





    Have you paid the Pre-Check program fees and gone through that prescreening interview process?

    – WBT
    May 10 at 18:58








  • 5





    It's not entirely clear whether you just happened to be getting "upgraded" to TSA Pre-Check a lot and now you didn't on a recent flight or if you were actually part of the Pre-Check program and happened to get downgraded this time.

    – Herohtar
    May 10 at 19:17














8












8








8








For the longest time: Delta had me running the gauntlet as Precheck. Today we were demoted to the standard inspection. The airline representative indicated that the decision was driven by TSA and has been applied to a number of passengers.



Given that TSA has incentive (they are resource constrained) to expedite travelers as Pre-Check, what possible cause would they have to revert Pre-Check passengers to standard status?










share|improve this question
















For the longest time: Delta had me running the gauntlet as Precheck. Today we were demoted to the standard inspection. The airline representative indicated that the decision was driven by TSA and has been applied to a number of passengers.



Given that TSA has incentive (they are resource constrained) to expedite travelers as Pre-Check, what possible cause would they have to revert Pre-Check passengers to standard status?







tsa tsa-precheck






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 10 at 15:06









David Richerby

16.5k105195




16.5k105195










asked May 10 at 14:51









gatorbackgatorback

1,408829




1,408829








  • 8





    Have you paid the Pre-Check program fees and gone through that prescreening interview process?

    – WBT
    May 10 at 18:58








  • 5





    It's not entirely clear whether you just happened to be getting "upgraded" to TSA Pre-Check a lot and now you didn't on a recent flight or if you were actually part of the Pre-Check program and happened to get downgraded this time.

    – Herohtar
    May 10 at 19:17














  • 8





    Have you paid the Pre-Check program fees and gone through that prescreening interview process?

    – WBT
    May 10 at 18:58








  • 5





    It's not entirely clear whether you just happened to be getting "upgraded" to TSA Pre-Check a lot and now you didn't on a recent flight or if you were actually part of the Pre-Check program and happened to get downgraded this time.

    – Herohtar
    May 10 at 19:17








8




8





Have you paid the Pre-Check program fees and gone through that prescreening interview process?

– WBT
May 10 at 18:58







Have you paid the Pre-Check program fees and gone through that prescreening interview process?

– WBT
May 10 at 18:58






5




5





It's not entirely clear whether you just happened to be getting "upgraded" to TSA Pre-Check a lot and now you didn't on a recent flight or if you were actually part of the Pre-Check program and happened to get downgraded this time.

– Herohtar
May 10 at 19:17





It's not entirely clear whether you just happened to be getting "upgraded" to TSA Pre-Check a lot and now you didn't on a recent flight or if you were actually part of the Pre-Check program and happened to get downgraded this time.

– Herohtar
May 10 at 19:17










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















18














The TSA is explicit.




If I am TSA Pre✓® eligible, am I guaranteed expedited screening?



No, TSA uses unpredictable security measures, both seen and unseen, throughout the airport. All travelers will be screened, and no individual is guaranteed expedited screening.




Officially, the airline does not choose which passengers receive expedited screening or not; this is a function of TSA's algorithms. Part of that algorithm will randomly send Pre-check passengers through for regular screening.



The whys should be self-evident (at least, from the viewpoint of a security bureaucrat). Trusted traveler programs are not a guarantee that some traveler is not a threat, or is not carrying items that could be used to harm passengers or the aircraft, so you still need to do spot checks. You also don't want people to start thinking Pre-check is some sort of badge of trustworthiness that now exempts them from carry-on restrictions, or other rules.



The TSA does not have a strong incentive to expedite travelers. They are a government agency, and if anything, they can make the case to Congress for more funding to increase headcount more easily if long lines are in the news.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    Agreed. Over the last few years I have regularly got a "free" TSA pre-check. However last year it was not on my ticket, but re-appeared again at Christmas which supports the idea of just a random extra check. Fingers-crossed for my next flight.

    – Dragonel
    May 10 at 17:59






  • 1





    My impression was that the random free TSA pre-check was kind of a marketing thing to let people experience it and thus decide they want to pay for it.

    – Herohtar
    May 10 at 19:21






  • 1





    TSA does charge a fee to apply and be approved for Pre-Check. That is like a class-of-service. Not having a guaranteed expedited screening and the why of it is orthogonal to the question (IMO) which was, why would TSA 'demote' a PreCheck traveler. Where the OP seemingly felt like a class of service was taken away from them. I think the key here is that it was Airline offered vs TSA process whetted.

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 21:28






  • 4





    @perennial_noob That is just not how it works. You sign up for Pre-check and go through the screening, but it's still theoretically possible that you could be required to go through standard screening every single time you fly and you would have no legal recourse— nothing was promised, and nothing has been taken away; no "demotion" has taken place. It behooves one to read the fine print, and in this case, the print isn't especially fine, it's there right with a red alert icon on the Pre-check homepage.

    – choster
    May 10 at 21:56






  • 1





    @choster - no disputes at all. You are answering the question of 'is there a guarantee', not why would TSA want to 'demote' a status. The answer lies more around what the deal was between the airline and TSA (because the OP learned from the airline that TSA had something to do with it). And inferring further, the actual TSA Pre-Check line still existed and was being used. As a PreCheck I have been told that the scanner doesn't work or we have to empty pockets like everyone. (Just that your line upto that point was faster.) So I know of it. Just that it is orthogonal to the root concern of OP.

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 22:01



















9















Given that TSA has incentive (they are resource constrained) to expedite travelers as Pre-Check, what possible cause would they have to revert Pre-Check passengers to standard status?




There is a good deal of consternation among people who have paid for it that people are sometimes given Pre-Check without having paid anything for the privilege. A bill to stop the TSA from doing that even passed the House of Representatives last year. Perhaps the TSA has quietly restricted the criteria for inclusion of passengers who haven't paid for the privilege.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    It wasn't exactly quiet. TSA has openly said in recent years that travelers who were not part of the Precheck program (or an equivalent that grants access, like Global Entry or a DOD ID card number) will be increasingly less likely to receive its benefits. To consistently receive Precheck, you have to enroll.

    – Zach Lipton
    May 10 at 20:55








  • 1





    This is the more pertinent answer IMO because it seems like Delta offered this privilege but TSA has no incentive to honor it any more because they have their own application process and each application is ~$80 to $100 (only TSA-Pre or Global Entry)

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 21:31






  • 1





    @ZachLipton thanks. I was looking for something that actually said that, and didn't find anything, which is why I said "quietly." If you can point me in the right direction, I'll gladly edit the answer.

    – phoog
    May 10 at 22:53











  • @phoog I think the term they use is "managed inclusion." This seems to say it's still happening to some extent, but less often than before.

    – Zach Lipton
    May 11 at 0:19






  • 1





    The ~$100 fee is dwarfed by the larger $$ issue of manpower / equipment and the political embarrassment caused by missed flights and 3-hour lines

    – gatorback
    May 12 at 3:53










protected by phoog May 15 at 21:59



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









18














The TSA is explicit.




If I am TSA Pre✓® eligible, am I guaranteed expedited screening?



No, TSA uses unpredictable security measures, both seen and unseen, throughout the airport. All travelers will be screened, and no individual is guaranteed expedited screening.




Officially, the airline does not choose which passengers receive expedited screening or not; this is a function of TSA's algorithms. Part of that algorithm will randomly send Pre-check passengers through for regular screening.



The whys should be self-evident (at least, from the viewpoint of a security bureaucrat). Trusted traveler programs are not a guarantee that some traveler is not a threat, or is not carrying items that could be used to harm passengers or the aircraft, so you still need to do spot checks. You also don't want people to start thinking Pre-check is some sort of badge of trustworthiness that now exempts them from carry-on restrictions, or other rules.



The TSA does not have a strong incentive to expedite travelers. They are a government agency, and if anything, they can make the case to Congress for more funding to increase headcount more easily if long lines are in the news.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    Agreed. Over the last few years I have regularly got a "free" TSA pre-check. However last year it was not on my ticket, but re-appeared again at Christmas which supports the idea of just a random extra check. Fingers-crossed for my next flight.

    – Dragonel
    May 10 at 17:59






  • 1





    My impression was that the random free TSA pre-check was kind of a marketing thing to let people experience it and thus decide they want to pay for it.

    – Herohtar
    May 10 at 19:21






  • 1





    TSA does charge a fee to apply and be approved for Pre-Check. That is like a class-of-service. Not having a guaranteed expedited screening and the why of it is orthogonal to the question (IMO) which was, why would TSA 'demote' a PreCheck traveler. Where the OP seemingly felt like a class of service was taken away from them. I think the key here is that it was Airline offered vs TSA process whetted.

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 21:28






  • 4





    @perennial_noob That is just not how it works. You sign up for Pre-check and go through the screening, but it's still theoretically possible that you could be required to go through standard screening every single time you fly and you would have no legal recourse— nothing was promised, and nothing has been taken away; no "demotion" has taken place. It behooves one to read the fine print, and in this case, the print isn't especially fine, it's there right with a red alert icon on the Pre-check homepage.

    – choster
    May 10 at 21:56






  • 1





    @choster - no disputes at all. You are answering the question of 'is there a guarantee', not why would TSA want to 'demote' a status. The answer lies more around what the deal was between the airline and TSA (because the OP learned from the airline that TSA had something to do with it). And inferring further, the actual TSA Pre-Check line still existed and was being used. As a PreCheck I have been told that the scanner doesn't work or we have to empty pockets like everyone. (Just that your line upto that point was faster.) So I know of it. Just that it is orthogonal to the root concern of OP.

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 22:01
















18














The TSA is explicit.




If I am TSA Pre✓® eligible, am I guaranteed expedited screening?



No, TSA uses unpredictable security measures, both seen and unseen, throughout the airport. All travelers will be screened, and no individual is guaranteed expedited screening.




Officially, the airline does not choose which passengers receive expedited screening or not; this is a function of TSA's algorithms. Part of that algorithm will randomly send Pre-check passengers through for regular screening.



The whys should be self-evident (at least, from the viewpoint of a security bureaucrat). Trusted traveler programs are not a guarantee that some traveler is not a threat, or is not carrying items that could be used to harm passengers or the aircraft, so you still need to do spot checks. You also don't want people to start thinking Pre-check is some sort of badge of trustworthiness that now exempts them from carry-on restrictions, or other rules.



The TSA does not have a strong incentive to expedite travelers. They are a government agency, and if anything, they can make the case to Congress for more funding to increase headcount more easily if long lines are in the news.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    Agreed. Over the last few years I have regularly got a "free" TSA pre-check. However last year it was not on my ticket, but re-appeared again at Christmas which supports the idea of just a random extra check. Fingers-crossed for my next flight.

    – Dragonel
    May 10 at 17:59






  • 1





    My impression was that the random free TSA pre-check was kind of a marketing thing to let people experience it and thus decide they want to pay for it.

    – Herohtar
    May 10 at 19:21






  • 1





    TSA does charge a fee to apply and be approved for Pre-Check. That is like a class-of-service. Not having a guaranteed expedited screening and the why of it is orthogonal to the question (IMO) which was, why would TSA 'demote' a PreCheck traveler. Where the OP seemingly felt like a class of service was taken away from them. I think the key here is that it was Airline offered vs TSA process whetted.

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 21:28






  • 4





    @perennial_noob That is just not how it works. You sign up for Pre-check and go through the screening, but it's still theoretically possible that you could be required to go through standard screening every single time you fly and you would have no legal recourse— nothing was promised, and nothing has been taken away; no "demotion" has taken place. It behooves one to read the fine print, and in this case, the print isn't especially fine, it's there right with a red alert icon on the Pre-check homepage.

    – choster
    May 10 at 21:56






  • 1





    @choster - no disputes at all. You are answering the question of 'is there a guarantee', not why would TSA want to 'demote' a status. The answer lies more around what the deal was between the airline and TSA (because the OP learned from the airline that TSA had something to do with it). And inferring further, the actual TSA Pre-Check line still existed and was being used. As a PreCheck I have been told that the scanner doesn't work or we have to empty pockets like everyone. (Just that your line upto that point was faster.) So I know of it. Just that it is orthogonal to the root concern of OP.

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 22:01














18












18








18







The TSA is explicit.




If I am TSA Pre✓® eligible, am I guaranteed expedited screening?



No, TSA uses unpredictable security measures, both seen and unseen, throughout the airport. All travelers will be screened, and no individual is guaranteed expedited screening.




Officially, the airline does not choose which passengers receive expedited screening or not; this is a function of TSA's algorithms. Part of that algorithm will randomly send Pre-check passengers through for regular screening.



The whys should be self-evident (at least, from the viewpoint of a security bureaucrat). Trusted traveler programs are not a guarantee that some traveler is not a threat, or is not carrying items that could be used to harm passengers or the aircraft, so you still need to do spot checks. You also don't want people to start thinking Pre-check is some sort of badge of trustworthiness that now exempts them from carry-on restrictions, or other rules.



The TSA does not have a strong incentive to expedite travelers. They are a government agency, and if anything, they can make the case to Congress for more funding to increase headcount more easily if long lines are in the news.






share|improve this answer













The TSA is explicit.




If I am TSA Pre✓® eligible, am I guaranteed expedited screening?



No, TSA uses unpredictable security measures, both seen and unseen, throughout the airport. All travelers will be screened, and no individual is guaranteed expedited screening.




Officially, the airline does not choose which passengers receive expedited screening or not; this is a function of TSA's algorithms. Part of that algorithm will randomly send Pre-check passengers through for regular screening.



The whys should be self-evident (at least, from the viewpoint of a security bureaucrat). Trusted traveler programs are not a guarantee that some traveler is not a threat, or is not carrying items that could be used to harm passengers or the aircraft, so you still need to do spot checks. You also don't want people to start thinking Pre-check is some sort of badge of trustworthiness that now exempts them from carry-on restrictions, or other rules.



The TSA does not have a strong incentive to expedite travelers. They are a government agency, and if anything, they can make the case to Congress for more funding to increase headcount more easily if long lines are in the news.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 10 at 15:27









chosterchoster

35.4k5101157




35.4k5101157








  • 2





    Agreed. Over the last few years I have regularly got a "free" TSA pre-check. However last year it was not on my ticket, but re-appeared again at Christmas which supports the idea of just a random extra check. Fingers-crossed for my next flight.

    – Dragonel
    May 10 at 17:59






  • 1





    My impression was that the random free TSA pre-check was kind of a marketing thing to let people experience it and thus decide they want to pay for it.

    – Herohtar
    May 10 at 19:21






  • 1





    TSA does charge a fee to apply and be approved for Pre-Check. That is like a class-of-service. Not having a guaranteed expedited screening and the why of it is orthogonal to the question (IMO) which was, why would TSA 'demote' a PreCheck traveler. Where the OP seemingly felt like a class of service was taken away from them. I think the key here is that it was Airline offered vs TSA process whetted.

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 21:28






  • 4





    @perennial_noob That is just not how it works. You sign up for Pre-check and go through the screening, but it's still theoretically possible that you could be required to go through standard screening every single time you fly and you would have no legal recourse— nothing was promised, and nothing has been taken away; no "demotion" has taken place. It behooves one to read the fine print, and in this case, the print isn't especially fine, it's there right with a red alert icon on the Pre-check homepage.

    – choster
    May 10 at 21:56






  • 1





    @choster - no disputes at all. You are answering the question of 'is there a guarantee', not why would TSA want to 'demote' a status. The answer lies more around what the deal was between the airline and TSA (because the OP learned from the airline that TSA had something to do with it). And inferring further, the actual TSA Pre-Check line still existed and was being used. As a PreCheck I have been told that the scanner doesn't work or we have to empty pockets like everyone. (Just that your line upto that point was faster.) So I know of it. Just that it is orthogonal to the root concern of OP.

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 22:01














  • 2





    Agreed. Over the last few years I have regularly got a "free" TSA pre-check. However last year it was not on my ticket, but re-appeared again at Christmas which supports the idea of just a random extra check. Fingers-crossed for my next flight.

    – Dragonel
    May 10 at 17:59






  • 1





    My impression was that the random free TSA pre-check was kind of a marketing thing to let people experience it and thus decide they want to pay for it.

    – Herohtar
    May 10 at 19:21






  • 1





    TSA does charge a fee to apply and be approved for Pre-Check. That is like a class-of-service. Not having a guaranteed expedited screening and the why of it is orthogonal to the question (IMO) which was, why would TSA 'demote' a PreCheck traveler. Where the OP seemingly felt like a class of service was taken away from them. I think the key here is that it was Airline offered vs TSA process whetted.

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 21:28






  • 4





    @perennial_noob That is just not how it works. You sign up for Pre-check and go through the screening, but it's still theoretically possible that you could be required to go through standard screening every single time you fly and you would have no legal recourse— nothing was promised, and nothing has been taken away; no "demotion" has taken place. It behooves one to read the fine print, and in this case, the print isn't especially fine, it's there right with a red alert icon on the Pre-check homepage.

    – choster
    May 10 at 21:56






  • 1





    @choster - no disputes at all. You are answering the question of 'is there a guarantee', not why would TSA want to 'demote' a status. The answer lies more around what the deal was between the airline and TSA (because the OP learned from the airline that TSA had something to do with it). And inferring further, the actual TSA Pre-Check line still existed and was being used. As a PreCheck I have been told that the scanner doesn't work or we have to empty pockets like everyone. (Just that your line upto that point was faster.) So I know of it. Just that it is orthogonal to the root concern of OP.

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 22:01








2




2





Agreed. Over the last few years I have regularly got a "free" TSA pre-check. However last year it was not on my ticket, but re-appeared again at Christmas which supports the idea of just a random extra check. Fingers-crossed for my next flight.

– Dragonel
May 10 at 17:59





Agreed. Over the last few years I have regularly got a "free" TSA pre-check. However last year it was not on my ticket, but re-appeared again at Christmas which supports the idea of just a random extra check. Fingers-crossed for my next flight.

– Dragonel
May 10 at 17:59




1




1





My impression was that the random free TSA pre-check was kind of a marketing thing to let people experience it and thus decide they want to pay for it.

– Herohtar
May 10 at 19:21





My impression was that the random free TSA pre-check was kind of a marketing thing to let people experience it and thus decide they want to pay for it.

– Herohtar
May 10 at 19:21




1




1





TSA does charge a fee to apply and be approved for Pre-Check. That is like a class-of-service. Not having a guaranteed expedited screening and the why of it is orthogonal to the question (IMO) which was, why would TSA 'demote' a PreCheck traveler. Where the OP seemingly felt like a class of service was taken away from them. I think the key here is that it was Airline offered vs TSA process whetted.

– perennial_noob
May 10 at 21:28





TSA does charge a fee to apply and be approved for Pre-Check. That is like a class-of-service. Not having a guaranteed expedited screening and the why of it is orthogonal to the question (IMO) which was, why would TSA 'demote' a PreCheck traveler. Where the OP seemingly felt like a class of service was taken away from them. I think the key here is that it was Airline offered vs TSA process whetted.

– perennial_noob
May 10 at 21:28




4




4





@perennial_noob That is just not how it works. You sign up for Pre-check and go through the screening, but it's still theoretically possible that you could be required to go through standard screening every single time you fly and you would have no legal recourse— nothing was promised, and nothing has been taken away; no "demotion" has taken place. It behooves one to read the fine print, and in this case, the print isn't especially fine, it's there right with a red alert icon on the Pre-check homepage.

– choster
May 10 at 21:56





@perennial_noob That is just not how it works. You sign up for Pre-check and go through the screening, but it's still theoretically possible that you could be required to go through standard screening every single time you fly and you would have no legal recourse— nothing was promised, and nothing has been taken away; no "demotion" has taken place. It behooves one to read the fine print, and in this case, the print isn't especially fine, it's there right with a red alert icon on the Pre-check homepage.

– choster
May 10 at 21:56




1




1





@choster - no disputes at all. You are answering the question of 'is there a guarantee', not why would TSA want to 'demote' a status. The answer lies more around what the deal was between the airline and TSA (because the OP learned from the airline that TSA had something to do with it). And inferring further, the actual TSA Pre-Check line still existed and was being used. As a PreCheck I have been told that the scanner doesn't work or we have to empty pockets like everyone. (Just that your line upto that point was faster.) So I know of it. Just that it is orthogonal to the root concern of OP.

– perennial_noob
May 10 at 22:01





@choster - no disputes at all. You are answering the question of 'is there a guarantee', not why would TSA want to 'demote' a status. The answer lies more around what the deal was between the airline and TSA (because the OP learned from the airline that TSA had something to do with it). And inferring further, the actual TSA Pre-Check line still existed and was being used. As a PreCheck I have been told that the scanner doesn't work or we have to empty pockets like everyone. (Just that your line upto that point was faster.) So I know of it. Just that it is orthogonal to the root concern of OP.

– perennial_noob
May 10 at 22:01













9















Given that TSA has incentive (they are resource constrained) to expedite travelers as Pre-Check, what possible cause would they have to revert Pre-Check passengers to standard status?




There is a good deal of consternation among people who have paid for it that people are sometimes given Pre-Check without having paid anything for the privilege. A bill to stop the TSA from doing that even passed the House of Representatives last year. Perhaps the TSA has quietly restricted the criteria for inclusion of passengers who haven't paid for the privilege.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    It wasn't exactly quiet. TSA has openly said in recent years that travelers who were not part of the Precheck program (or an equivalent that grants access, like Global Entry or a DOD ID card number) will be increasingly less likely to receive its benefits. To consistently receive Precheck, you have to enroll.

    – Zach Lipton
    May 10 at 20:55








  • 1





    This is the more pertinent answer IMO because it seems like Delta offered this privilege but TSA has no incentive to honor it any more because they have their own application process and each application is ~$80 to $100 (only TSA-Pre or Global Entry)

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 21:31






  • 1





    @ZachLipton thanks. I was looking for something that actually said that, and didn't find anything, which is why I said "quietly." If you can point me in the right direction, I'll gladly edit the answer.

    – phoog
    May 10 at 22:53











  • @phoog I think the term they use is "managed inclusion." This seems to say it's still happening to some extent, but less often than before.

    – Zach Lipton
    May 11 at 0:19






  • 1





    The ~$100 fee is dwarfed by the larger $$ issue of manpower / equipment and the political embarrassment caused by missed flights and 3-hour lines

    – gatorback
    May 12 at 3:53
















9















Given that TSA has incentive (they are resource constrained) to expedite travelers as Pre-Check, what possible cause would they have to revert Pre-Check passengers to standard status?




There is a good deal of consternation among people who have paid for it that people are sometimes given Pre-Check without having paid anything for the privilege. A bill to stop the TSA from doing that even passed the House of Representatives last year. Perhaps the TSA has quietly restricted the criteria for inclusion of passengers who haven't paid for the privilege.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    It wasn't exactly quiet. TSA has openly said in recent years that travelers who were not part of the Precheck program (or an equivalent that grants access, like Global Entry or a DOD ID card number) will be increasingly less likely to receive its benefits. To consistently receive Precheck, you have to enroll.

    – Zach Lipton
    May 10 at 20:55








  • 1





    This is the more pertinent answer IMO because it seems like Delta offered this privilege but TSA has no incentive to honor it any more because they have their own application process and each application is ~$80 to $100 (only TSA-Pre or Global Entry)

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 21:31






  • 1





    @ZachLipton thanks. I was looking for something that actually said that, and didn't find anything, which is why I said "quietly." If you can point me in the right direction, I'll gladly edit the answer.

    – phoog
    May 10 at 22:53











  • @phoog I think the term they use is "managed inclusion." This seems to say it's still happening to some extent, but less often than before.

    – Zach Lipton
    May 11 at 0:19






  • 1





    The ~$100 fee is dwarfed by the larger $$ issue of manpower / equipment and the political embarrassment caused by missed flights and 3-hour lines

    – gatorback
    May 12 at 3:53














9












9








9








Given that TSA has incentive (they are resource constrained) to expedite travelers as Pre-Check, what possible cause would they have to revert Pre-Check passengers to standard status?




There is a good deal of consternation among people who have paid for it that people are sometimes given Pre-Check without having paid anything for the privilege. A bill to stop the TSA from doing that even passed the House of Representatives last year. Perhaps the TSA has quietly restricted the criteria for inclusion of passengers who haven't paid for the privilege.






share|improve this answer














Given that TSA has incentive (they are resource constrained) to expedite travelers as Pre-Check, what possible cause would they have to revert Pre-Check passengers to standard status?




There is a good deal of consternation among people who have paid for it that people are sometimes given Pre-Check without having paid anything for the privilege. A bill to stop the TSA from doing that even passed the House of Representatives last year. Perhaps the TSA has quietly restricted the criteria for inclusion of passengers who haven't paid for the privilege.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 10 at 15:26









phoogphoog

80.4k13178261




80.4k13178261








  • 2





    It wasn't exactly quiet. TSA has openly said in recent years that travelers who were not part of the Precheck program (or an equivalent that grants access, like Global Entry or a DOD ID card number) will be increasingly less likely to receive its benefits. To consistently receive Precheck, you have to enroll.

    – Zach Lipton
    May 10 at 20:55








  • 1





    This is the more pertinent answer IMO because it seems like Delta offered this privilege but TSA has no incentive to honor it any more because they have their own application process and each application is ~$80 to $100 (only TSA-Pre or Global Entry)

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 21:31






  • 1





    @ZachLipton thanks. I was looking for something that actually said that, and didn't find anything, which is why I said "quietly." If you can point me in the right direction, I'll gladly edit the answer.

    – phoog
    May 10 at 22:53











  • @phoog I think the term they use is "managed inclusion." This seems to say it's still happening to some extent, but less often than before.

    – Zach Lipton
    May 11 at 0:19






  • 1





    The ~$100 fee is dwarfed by the larger $$ issue of manpower / equipment and the political embarrassment caused by missed flights and 3-hour lines

    – gatorback
    May 12 at 3:53














  • 2





    It wasn't exactly quiet. TSA has openly said in recent years that travelers who were not part of the Precheck program (or an equivalent that grants access, like Global Entry or a DOD ID card number) will be increasingly less likely to receive its benefits. To consistently receive Precheck, you have to enroll.

    – Zach Lipton
    May 10 at 20:55








  • 1





    This is the more pertinent answer IMO because it seems like Delta offered this privilege but TSA has no incentive to honor it any more because they have their own application process and each application is ~$80 to $100 (only TSA-Pre or Global Entry)

    – perennial_noob
    May 10 at 21:31






  • 1





    @ZachLipton thanks. I was looking for something that actually said that, and didn't find anything, which is why I said "quietly." If you can point me in the right direction, I'll gladly edit the answer.

    – phoog
    May 10 at 22:53











  • @phoog I think the term they use is "managed inclusion." This seems to say it's still happening to some extent, but less often than before.

    – Zach Lipton
    May 11 at 0:19






  • 1





    The ~$100 fee is dwarfed by the larger $$ issue of manpower / equipment and the political embarrassment caused by missed flights and 3-hour lines

    – gatorback
    May 12 at 3:53








2




2





It wasn't exactly quiet. TSA has openly said in recent years that travelers who were not part of the Precheck program (or an equivalent that grants access, like Global Entry or a DOD ID card number) will be increasingly less likely to receive its benefits. To consistently receive Precheck, you have to enroll.

– Zach Lipton
May 10 at 20:55







It wasn't exactly quiet. TSA has openly said in recent years that travelers who were not part of the Precheck program (or an equivalent that grants access, like Global Entry or a DOD ID card number) will be increasingly less likely to receive its benefits. To consistently receive Precheck, you have to enroll.

– Zach Lipton
May 10 at 20:55






1




1





This is the more pertinent answer IMO because it seems like Delta offered this privilege but TSA has no incentive to honor it any more because they have their own application process and each application is ~$80 to $100 (only TSA-Pre or Global Entry)

– perennial_noob
May 10 at 21:31





This is the more pertinent answer IMO because it seems like Delta offered this privilege but TSA has no incentive to honor it any more because they have their own application process and each application is ~$80 to $100 (only TSA-Pre or Global Entry)

– perennial_noob
May 10 at 21:31




1




1





@ZachLipton thanks. I was looking for something that actually said that, and didn't find anything, which is why I said "quietly." If you can point me in the right direction, I'll gladly edit the answer.

– phoog
May 10 at 22:53





@ZachLipton thanks. I was looking for something that actually said that, and didn't find anything, which is why I said "quietly." If you can point me in the right direction, I'll gladly edit the answer.

– phoog
May 10 at 22:53













@phoog I think the term they use is "managed inclusion." This seems to say it's still happening to some extent, but less often than before.

– Zach Lipton
May 11 at 0:19





@phoog I think the term they use is "managed inclusion." This seems to say it's still happening to some extent, but less often than before.

– Zach Lipton
May 11 at 0:19




1




1





The ~$100 fee is dwarfed by the larger $$ issue of manpower / equipment and the political embarrassment caused by missed flights and 3-hour lines

– gatorback
May 12 at 3:53





The ~$100 fee is dwarfed by the larger $$ issue of manpower / equipment and the political embarrassment caused by missed flights and 3-hour lines

– gatorback
May 12 at 3:53





protected by phoog May 15 at 21:59



Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



Popular posts from this blog

Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029