Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?












6












$begingroup$


I found there are two incongruent isosceles triangles with integer sides and areas, where both have same perimeter, same area.



I looked around Dickson's History of Number Theory but couldn't find where the right triangle version is treated. [I thought if a nonexistence proof was simple it would pop up in my search, but found none.]



It may be simple to show none exist, but I had no luck, only filled few notebook pages with formulas going nowhere. Reference/example/proof appreciated. Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    6












    $begingroup$


    I found there are two incongruent isosceles triangles with integer sides and areas, where both have same perimeter, same area.



    I looked around Dickson's History of Number Theory but couldn't find where the right triangle version is treated. [I thought if a nonexistence proof was simple it would pop up in my search, but found none.]



    It may be simple to show none exist, but I had no luck, only filled few notebook pages with formulas going nowhere. Reference/example/proof appreciated. Thanks.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      6












      6








      6





      $begingroup$


      I found there are two incongruent isosceles triangles with integer sides and areas, where both have same perimeter, same area.



      I looked around Dickson's History of Number Theory but couldn't find where the right triangle version is treated. [I thought if a nonexistence proof was simple it would pop up in my search, but found none.]



      It may be simple to show none exist, but I had no luck, only filled few notebook pages with formulas going nowhere. Reference/example/proof appreciated. Thanks.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I found there are two incongruent isosceles triangles with integer sides and areas, where both have same perimeter, same area.



      I looked around Dickson's History of Number Theory but couldn't find where the right triangle version is treated. [I thought if a nonexistence proof was simple it would pop up in my search, but found none.]



      It may be simple to show none exist, but I had no luck, only filled few notebook pages with formulas going nowhere. Reference/example/proof appreciated. Thanks.







      geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 12 hours ago









      Gregory Nisbet

      835712




      835712










      asked 17 hours ago









      coffeemathcoffeemath

      2,9491415




      2,9491415






















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7












          $begingroup$

          Consider two right triangles, with hypotenuses $p$ and $q$ and respective acute angles $theta$ and $phi$. To see that having equal perimeter and area makes them congruent, it suffices to show that
          $$theta = phi qquadtext{or}qquad theta+phi=frac{pi}{2} tag{0}$$
          (Either makes the triangles similar, which in turn makes them congruent.)



          Equating perimeters and areas gives a system we can write as



          $$begin{align}
          p(1+sintheta+costheta) &= q(1+sinphi+cosphi) \
          p^2 sintheta costheta &= q^2 sinphi cosphi
          end{align} tag{1}$$



          Defining $u:=tan(theta/2)$, we "know" that
          $$sintheta = frac{2u}{1+u^2} qquad costheta=frac{1-u^2}{1+u^2} quadtoquad 1+costheta+sintheta= frac{2 (1 + u)}{1 + u^2}$$
          and likewise for $v:=tan(phi/2)$. Thus, $(1)$ can be rewritten as
          $$begin{align}
          pfrac{(1+u)}{1+u^2} &= qfrac{(1+v)}{1+v^2} \[4pt]
          p^2frac{u(1+u)(1-u)}{(1+u^2)^2} &= q^2frac{v(1+v)(1-v)}{(1+v^2)^2}
          end{align}tag{2}$$

          Dividing the second equation by the square of the first ...



          $$frac{u(1-u)}{1+u} = frac{v(1-v)}{1+v} quadtoquad (u-v)(uv+u+v-1)=0 quadtoquad u=v, text{ or } frac{u+v}{1-uv}=1 tag{3}$$



          Therefore, we have one of the following situations (bearing in mind that $theta/2$ and $phi/2$ are each at most $pi/4$, so that we may draw appropriate conclusions from these tangent inequalities):
          $$begin{align}
          tanfrac{theta}{2}=tanfrac{phi}{2} &quadtoquad theta=phi \[4pt]
          frac{tan(theta/2)+tan(phi/2)}{1-tan(theta/2)tan(phi/2)} = 1 &quadtoquad
          tanleft(frac{theta}{2}+frac{phi}{2}right)=tanfrac{pi}{4} quadtoquad theta+phi=frac{pi}{2}end{align} tag{4}$$

          which match the sufficient conditions in $(0)$. $square$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            8












            $begingroup$

            Let $S$ be the circumference and $A$ twice the area of a triangle.



            Then,
            $$a_i+b_i+sqrt{a_i^2+b_i^2}=S
            text{ and } a_ib_i=A. tag{1}$$

            After squaring, $S^2+2A-2S(a_i+b_i)=0$ and from here $a_i+b_i=S/2+A/S$. Thus, $c_i=S-(a_i+b_i)=S/2-A/S=c$, that is, triangles have the same hypotenuse.



            Then, $a_i+b_i=S-c=T$ and $a_ib_i=A$, which results in a solutions for $a_i$ and $b_i$ expressed in terms of constants $A$ and $T$. Although one of the resulting equations is quadratic, there is a symmetric pair of solutions (thank you for comments below). Hence, all sides must be the same.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 3




              $begingroup$
              Really nice proof. I have a niggle with your last statement though. In general, $2$ equations with $2$ unknowns may well have multiple solutions if they are not linear. For example, the OP mentions isosceles triangles, where the triangles $(8,8,12)$ and $(6,11,11)$ have the same perimeter and area even though isosceles triangles are also parametrised by two variables. Of course, in your case you know the sum and product of $a$ and $b$, which is a particularly nice pair of equations well known to have a symmetric pair of solutions.
              $endgroup$
              – Jaap Scherphuis
              15 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              @Jaap Scherphuis -- Thank you for your comment and clarification.
              $endgroup$
              – dnqxt
              15 hours ago












            • $begingroup$
              @Dawood ibn Kareem -- Thanks for the comment. I added in the answer the clarification made by Jaap Scherphuis.
              $endgroup$
              – dnqxt
              8 hours ago



















            5












            $begingroup$

            Consider a right-angled triangle with sides $a$ and $b$.

            The hypotenuse has length $c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$.
            Its area is $ab/2$, and perimeter is $a+b+c$.



            I will allow $a,b,c$ to be any positive real numbers, not restrict them to positive integers.



            Suppose we scale the triangles such that $ab=1$, (i.e. an area of $1/2$). Is it possible to have two of these triangles that are distinct but with the same perimeter?



            We may assume that $a$ is the longer side, i.e. $a>b$, so we must have $a>1$.



            The perimeter is
            $$P(a) = a+b+c\ = a+b+sqrt{a^2+b^2}\ = a+frac{1}{a}+sqrt{a^2+frac{1}{a^2}}$$



            This is an increasing function on the interval $[1,infty)$ because its derivative w.r.t. $a$ is positive for $a>1$. This is tedious to check by hand, so I used Wolfram alpha. You can however understand why this is the case by noticing that if you increase $a$, then the rate at which $a$ increases is larger than the rate at which $1/a$ decreases, and the same holds for $a^2$ versus $1/a^2$.



            This means that there are no two values of $a$, both with $a>1$ for which you get the same perimeter.



            Bringing it back to the original problem, it means that there are no two right-angled triangles with the same perimeter and area, unless they have the same sides. Basically, given an area and a perimeter, their two equations uniquely determine the two triangle sides because the lines those equations represent are not curved enough to intersect multiple times.





            P.S. By the way, the OP mentioned that there are pairs of isosceles triangles with matching areas and perimeters, even when all sides and the area are integers. Two examples are:
            $(29,29,40)$ and $(37,37,24)$,

            and also
            $(218,218,240)$ and $(233,233,210)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$





















              4












              $begingroup$

              The area and the perimeter uniquely define the radius of the inscribed circle because $A=frac12Pr$, and the hypotenuse because $r=frac{P}{2}-c$. That fixes both $a+b=P-c$ and $ab=2A$ so $a$ and $b$ are also unique up to permutation, QED.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$





















                2












                $begingroup$

                Long Comment:



                You can at least give the simple formulae for the perimeter $P$ and area $A$ of a right angle triangle.



                If $z^2=x^2+y^2$ is a primitive Pythagorean triangle with $x$ being the base of the triangle and $y$ being the height (due to the right angle), then $P=x+y+z$ and $A=frac{1}{2}xy$



                Then you can quote the formulae for primitive Pythagorean Triples, where $z=left(a^2+b^2right)$, $x=left(a^2-b^2right)$ and $y=2ab$



                To expand to all the non primitive Pythagorean triangles we have



                $$(cz)^2=(cx)^2+(cy)^2$$



                Therefore



                $$P=a(2a+2b)c$$
                $$A=frac{1}{2} left(a^2-b^2right)(2ab)c^2=left(a^2-b^2right)abc^2$$



                For two incongruent Pythagorean triangles 1 and 2 the condition is



                $$P_1=P_2 ;;text{and} ;; A_1=A_2$$



                For Perimeter:
                $$a_1(2a_1+2b_1)c_1=a_2(2a_2+2b_2)c_2$$
                $$frac{a_2+b_2}{a_1+b_1}=frac{a_1c_1}{a_2c_2}tag{1}$$
                For Area:
                $$left(a_1^2-b_1^2right)a_1b_1c_1^2=left(a_2^2-b_2^2right)a_2b_2c_2^2$$
                $$frac{a_2+b_2}{a_1+b_1}=frac{a_1c_1}{a_2c_2}left(frac{b_1c_1}{b_2c_2}frac{ (a_1-b_1) }{ (a_2-b_2) } right)$$



                Therefore combining both gives



                $$b_1c_1(a_1-b_1)=b_2c_2(a_2-b_2)tag{2}$$



                Update:



                Using (1) and (2) we can eliminate the variables $c_1$ and $c_2$ eventually giving
                $$frac{ (a_2+b_2) a_2 }{ (a_1+b_1) a_1 }=frac{ (a_2-b_2) b_2 }{ (a_1-b_1) b_1 }$$
                or
                $$frac{ (a_2+b_2) a_2 }{ (a_2-b_2) b_2 }=frac{ (a_1+b_1) a_1 }{ (a_1-b_1) b_1 }$$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  In the version you use for primitive triples I think one needs $a,b$ odd and coprime, $a>b$ to give triples of positives. [That seems it would be known in that version…] I used the other version in my attempt, $p^2-q^2,2pq,p^2+q^2$ with $p,q$ coprime opposite parity and $p>q.$ Still didn't go to a finish in my attempts though.
                  $endgroup$
                  – coffeemath
                  16 hours ago






                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  updated to your version
                  $endgroup$
                  – James Arathoon
                  15 hours ago












                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3182185%2fare-there-incongruent-pythagorean-triangles-with-the-same-perimeter-and-same-are%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                5 Answers
                5






                active

                oldest

                votes








                5 Answers
                5






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                7












                $begingroup$

                Consider two right triangles, with hypotenuses $p$ and $q$ and respective acute angles $theta$ and $phi$. To see that having equal perimeter and area makes them congruent, it suffices to show that
                $$theta = phi qquadtext{or}qquad theta+phi=frac{pi}{2} tag{0}$$
                (Either makes the triangles similar, which in turn makes them congruent.)



                Equating perimeters and areas gives a system we can write as



                $$begin{align}
                p(1+sintheta+costheta) &= q(1+sinphi+cosphi) \
                p^2 sintheta costheta &= q^2 sinphi cosphi
                end{align} tag{1}$$



                Defining $u:=tan(theta/2)$, we "know" that
                $$sintheta = frac{2u}{1+u^2} qquad costheta=frac{1-u^2}{1+u^2} quadtoquad 1+costheta+sintheta= frac{2 (1 + u)}{1 + u^2}$$
                and likewise for $v:=tan(phi/2)$. Thus, $(1)$ can be rewritten as
                $$begin{align}
                pfrac{(1+u)}{1+u^2} &= qfrac{(1+v)}{1+v^2} \[4pt]
                p^2frac{u(1+u)(1-u)}{(1+u^2)^2} &= q^2frac{v(1+v)(1-v)}{(1+v^2)^2}
                end{align}tag{2}$$

                Dividing the second equation by the square of the first ...



                $$frac{u(1-u)}{1+u} = frac{v(1-v)}{1+v} quadtoquad (u-v)(uv+u+v-1)=0 quadtoquad u=v, text{ or } frac{u+v}{1-uv}=1 tag{3}$$



                Therefore, we have one of the following situations (bearing in mind that $theta/2$ and $phi/2$ are each at most $pi/4$, so that we may draw appropriate conclusions from these tangent inequalities):
                $$begin{align}
                tanfrac{theta}{2}=tanfrac{phi}{2} &quadtoquad theta=phi \[4pt]
                frac{tan(theta/2)+tan(phi/2)}{1-tan(theta/2)tan(phi/2)} = 1 &quadtoquad
                tanleft(frac{theta}{2}+frac{phi}{2}right)=tanfrac{pi}{4} quadtoquad theta+phi=frac{pi}{2}end{align} tag{4}$$

                which match the sufficient conditions in $(0)$. $square$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  7












                  $begingroup$

                  Consider two right triangles, with hypotenuses $p$ and $q$ and respective acute angles $theta$ and $phi$. To see that having equal perimeter and area makes them congruent, it suffices to show that
                  $$theta = phi qquadtext{or}qquad theta+phi=frac{pi}{2} tag{0}$$
                  (Either makes the triangles similar, which in turn makes them congruent.)



                  Equating perimeters and areas gives a system we can write as



                  $$begin{align}
                  p(1+sintheta+costheta) &= q(1+sinphi+cosphi) \
                  p^2 sintheta costheta &= q^2 sinphi cosphi
                  end{align} tag{1}$$



                  Defining $u:=tan(theta/2)$, we "know" that
                  $$sintheta = frac{2u}{1+u^2} qquad costheta=frac{1-u^2}{1+u^2} quadtoquad 1+costheta+sintheta= frac{2 (1 + u)}{1 + u^2}$$
                  and likewise for $v:=tan(phi/2)$. Thus, $(1)$ can be rewritten as
                  $$begin{align}
                  pfrac{(1+u)}{1+u^2} &= qfrac{(1+v)}{1+v^2} \[4pt]
                  p^2frac{u(1+u)(1-u)}{(1+u^2)^2} &= q^2frac{v(1+v)(1-v)}{(1+v^2)^2}
                  end{align}tag{2}$$

                  Dividing the second equation by the square of the first ...



                  $$frac{u(1-u)}{1+u} = frac{v(1-v)}{1+v} quadtoquad (u-v)(uv+u+v-1)=0 quadtoquad u=v, text{ or } frac{u+v}{1-uv}=1 tag{3}$$



                  Therefore, we have one of the following situations (bearing in mind that $theta/2$ and $phi/2$ are each at most $pi/4$, so that we may draw appropriate conclusions from these tangent inequalities):
                  $$begin{align}
                  tanfrac{theta}{2}=tanfrac{phi}{2} &quadtoquad theta=phi \[4pt]
                  frac{tan(theta/2)+tan(phi/2)}{1-tan(theta/2)tan(phi/2)} = 1 &quadtoquad
                  tanleft(frac{theta}{2}+frac{phi}{2}right)=tanfrac{pi}{4} quadtoquad theta+phi=frac{pi}{2}end{align} tag{4}$$

                  which match the sufficient conditions in $(0)$. $square$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    7












                    7








                    7





                    $begingroup$

                    Consider two right triangles, with hypotenuses $p$ and $q$ and respective acute angles $theta$ and $phi$. To see that having equal perimeter and area makes them congruent, it suffices to show that
                    $$theta = phi qquadtext{or}qquad theta+phi=frac{pi}{2} tag{0}$$
                    (Either makes the triangles similar, which in turn makes them congruent.)



                    Equating perimeters and areas gives a system we can write as



                    $$begin{align}
                    p(1+sintheta+costheta) &= q(1+sinphi+cosphi) \
                    p^2 sintheta costheta &= q^2 sinphi cosphi
                    end{align} tag{1}$$



                    Defining $u:=tan(theta/2)$, we "know" that
                    $$sintheta = frac{2u}{1+u^2} qquad costheta=frac{1-u^2}{1+u^2} quadtoquad 1+costheta+sintheta= frac{2 (1 + u)}{1 + u^2}$$
                    and likewise for $v:=tan(phi/2)$. Thus, $(1)$ can be rewritten as
                    $$begin{align}
                    pfrac{(1+u)}{1+u^2} &= qfrac{(1+v)}{1+v^2} \[4pt]
                    p^2frac{u(1+u)(1-u)}{(1+u^2)^2} &= q^2frac{v(1+v)(1-v)}{(1+v^2)^2}
                    end{align}tag{2}$$

                    Dividing the second equation by the square of the first ...



                    $$frac{u(1-u)}{1+u} = frac{v(1-v)}{1+v} quadtoquad (u-v)(uv+u+v-1)=0 quadtoquad u=v, text{ or } frac{u+v}{1-uv}=1 tag{3}$$



                    Therefore, we have one of the following situations (bearing in mind that $theta/2$ and $phi/2$ are each at most $pi/4$, so that we may draw appropriate conclusions from these tangent inequalities):
                    $$begin{align}
                    tanfrac{theta}{2}=tanfrac{phi}{2} &quadtoquad theta=phi \[4pt]
                    frac{tan(theta/2)+tan(phi/2)}{1-tan(theta/2)tan(phi/2)} = 1 &quadtoquad
                    tanleft(frac{theta}{2}+frac{phi}{2}right)=tanfrac{pi}{4} quadtoquad theta+phi=frac{pi}{2}end{align} tag{4}$$

                    which match the sufficient conditions in $(0)$. $square$






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Consider two right triangles, with hypotenuses $p$ and $q$ and respective acute angles $theta$ and $phi$. To see that having equal perimeter and area makes them congruent, it suffices to show that
                    $$theta = phi qquadtext{or}qquad theta+phi=frac{pi}{2} tag{0}$$
                    (Either makes the triangles similar, which in turn makes them congruent.)



                    Equating perimeters and areas gives a system we can write as



                    $$begin{align}
                    p(1+sintheta+costheta) &= q(1+sinphi+cosphi) \
                    p^2 sintheta costheta &= q^2 sinphi cosphi
                    end{align} tag{1}$$



                    Defining $u:=tan(theta/2)$, we "know" that
                    $$sintheta = frac{2u}{1+u^2} qquad costheta=frac{1-u^2}{1+u^2} quadtoquad 1+costheta+sintheta= frac{2 (1 + u)}{1 + u^2}$$
                    and likewise for $v:=tan(phi/2)$. Thus, $(1)$ can be rewritten as
                    $$begin{align}
                    pfrac{(1+u)}{1+u^2} &= qfrac{(1+v)}{1+v^2} \[4pt]
                    p^2frac{u(1+u)(1-u)}{(1+u^2)^2} &= q^2frac{v(1+v)(1-v)}{(1+v^2)^2}
                    end{align}tag{2}$$

                    Dividing the second equation by the square of the first ...



                    $$frac{u(1-u)}{1+u} = frac{v(1-v)}{1+v} quadtoquad (u-v)(uv+u+v-1)=0 quadtoquad u=v, text{ or } frac{u+v}{1-uv}=1 tag{3}$$



                    Therefore, we have one of the following situations (bearing in mind that $theta/2$ and $phi/2$ are each at most $pi/4$, so that we may draw appropriate conclusions from these tangent inequalities):
                    $$begin{align}
                    tanfrac{theta}{2}=tanfrac{phi}{2} &quadtoquad theta=phi \[4pt]
                    frac{tan(theta/2)+tan(phi/2)}{1-tan(theta/2)tan(phi/2)} = 1 &quadtoquad
                    tanleft(frac{theta}{2}+frac{phi}{2}right)=tanfrac{pi}{4} quadtoquad theta+phi=frac{pi}{2}end{align} tag{4}$$

                    which match the sufficient conditions in $(0)$. $square$







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 13 hours ago









                    BlueBlue

                    49.6k870158




                    49.6k870158























                        8












                        $begingroup$

                        Let $S$ be the circumference and $A$ twice the area of a triangle.



                        Then,
                        $$a_i+b_i+sqrt{a_i^2+b_i^2}=S
                        text{ and } a_ib_i=A. tag{1}$$

                        After squaring, $S^2+2A-2S(a_i+b_i)=0$ and from here $a_i+b_i=S/2+A/S$. Thus, $c_i=S-(a_i+b_i)=S/2-A/S=c$, that is, triangles have the same hypotenuse.



                        Then, $a_i+b_i=S-c=T$ and $a_ib_i=A$, which results in a solutions for $a_i$ and $b_i$ expressed in terms of constants $A$ and $T$. Although one of the resulting equations is quadratic, there is a symmetric pair of solutions (thank you for comments below). Hence, all sides must be the same.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$









                        • 3




                          $begingroup$
                          Really nice proof. I have a niggle with your last statement though. In general, $2$ equations with $2$ unknowns may well have multiple solutions if they are not linear. For example, the OP mentions isosceles triangles, where the triangles $(8,8,12)$ and $(6,11,11)$ have the same perimeter and area even though isosceles triangles are also parametrised by two variables. Of course, in your case you know the sum and product of $a$ and $b$, which is a particularly nice pair of equations well known to have a symmetric pair of solutions.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Jaap Scherphuis
                          15 hours ago












                        • $begingroup$
                          @Jaap Scherphuis -- Thank you for your comment and clarification.
                          $endgroup$
                          – dnqxt
                          15 hours ago












                        • $begingroup$
                          @Dawood ibn Kareem -- Thanks for the comment. I added in the answer the clarification made by Jaap Scherphuis.
                          $endgroup$
                          – dnqxt
                          8 hours ago
















                        8












                        $begingroup$

                        Let $S$ be the circumference and $A$ twice the area of a triangle.



                        Then,
                        $$a_i+b_i+sqrt{a_i^2+b_i^2}=S
                        text{ and } a_ib_i=A. tag{1}$$

                        After squaring, $S^2+2A-2S(a_i+b_i)=0$ and from here $a_i+b_i=S/2+A/S$. Thus, $c_i=S-(a_i+b_i)=S/2-A/S=c$, that is, triangles have the same hypotenuse.



                        Then, $a_i+b_i=S-c=T$ and $a_ib_i=A$, which results in a solutions for $a_i$ and $b_i$ expressed in terms of constants $A$ and $T$. Although one of the resulting equations is quadratic, there is a symmetric pair of solutions (thank you for comments below). Hence, all sides must be the same.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$









                        • 3




                          $begingroup$
                          Really nice proof. I have a niggle with your last statement though. In general, $2$ equations with $2$ unknowns may well have multiple solutions if they are not linear. For example, the OP mentions isosceles triangles, where the triangles $(8,8,12)$ and $(6,11,11)$ have the same perimeter and area even though isosceles triangles are also parametrised by two variables. Of course, in your case you know the sum and product of $a$ and $b$, which is a particularly nice pair of equations well known to have a symmetric pair of solutions.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Jaap Scherphuis
                          15 hours ago












                        • $begingroup$
                          @Jaap Scherphuis -- Thank you for your comment and clarification.
                          $endgroup$
                          – dnqxt
                          15 hours ago












                        • $begingroup$
                          @Dawood ibn Kareem -- Thanks for the comment. I added in the answer the clarification made by Jaap Scherphuis.
                          $endgroup$
                          – dnqxt
                          8 hours ago














                        8












                        8








                        8





                        $begingroup$

                        Let $S$ be the circumference and $A$ twice the area of a triangle.



                        Then,
                        $$a_i+b_i+sqrt{a_i^2+b_i^2}=S
                        text{ and } a_ib_i=A. tag{1}$$

                        After squaring, $S^2+2A-2S(a_i+b_i)=0$ and from here $a_i+b_i=S/2+A/S$. Thus, $c_i=S-(a_i+b_i)=S/2-A/S=c$, that is, triangles have the same hypotenuse.



                        Then, $a_i+b_i=S-c=T$ and $a_ib_i=A$, which results in a solutions for $a_i$ and $b_i$ expressed in terms of constants $A$ and $T$. Although one of the resulting equations is quadratic, there is a symmetric pair of solutions (thank you for comments below). Hence, all sides must be the same.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$



                        Let $S$ be the circumference and $A$ twice the area of a triangle.



                        Then,
                        $$a_i+b_i+sqrt{a_i^2+b_i^2}=S
                        text{ and } a_ib_i=A. tag{1}$$

                        After squaring, $S^2+2A-2S(a_i+b_i)=0$ and from here $a_i+b_i=S/2+A/S$. Thus, $c_i=S-(a_i+b_i)=S/2-A/S=c$, that is, triangles have the same hypotenuse.



                        Then, $a_i+b_i=S-c=T$ and $a_ib_i=A$, which results in a solutions for $a_i$ and $b_i$ expressed in terms of constants $A$ and $T$. Although one of the resulting equations is quadratic, there is a symmetric pair of solutions (thank you for comments below). Hence, all sides must be the same.







                        share|cite|improve this answer














                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        edited 8 hours ago

























                        answered 15 hours ago









                        dnqxtdnqxt

                        7075




                        7075








                        • 3




                          $begingroup$
                          Really nice proof. I have a niggle with your last statement though. In general, $2$ equations with $2$ unknowns may well have multiple solutions if they are not linear. For example, the OP mentions isosceles triangles, where the triangles $(8,8,12)$ and $(6,11,11)$ have the same perimeter and area even though isosceles triangles are also parametrised by two variables. Of course, in your case you know the sum and product of $a$ and $b$, which is a particularly nice pair of equations well known to have a symmetric pair of solutions.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Jaap Scherphuis
                          15 hours ago












                        • $begingroup$
                          @Jaap Scherphuis -- Thank you for your comment and clarification.
                          $endgroup$
                          – dnqxt
                          15 hours ago












                        • $begingroup$
                          @Dawood ibn Kareem -- Thanks for the comment. I added in the answer the clarification made by Jaap Scherphuis.
                          $endgroup$
                          – dnqxt
                          8 hours ago














                        • 3




                          $begingroup$
                          Really nice proof. I have a niggle with your last statement though. In general, $2$ equations with $2$ unknowns may well have multiple solutions if they are not linear. For example, the OP mentions isosceles triangles, where the triangles $(8,8,12)$ and $(6,11,11)$ have the same perimeter and area even though isosceles triangles are also parametrised by two variables. Of course, in your case you know the sum and product of $a$ and $b$, which is a particularly nice pair of equations well known to have a symmetric pair of solutions.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Jaap Scherphuis
                          15 hours ago












                        • $begingroup$
                          @Jaap Scherphuis -- Thank you for your comment and clarification.
                          $endgroup$
                          – dnqxt
                          15 hours ago












                        • $begingroup$
                          @Dawood ibn Kareem -- Thanks for the comment. I added in the answer the clarification made by Jaap Scherphuis.
                          $endgroup$
                          – dnqxt
                          8 hours ago








                        3




                        3




                        $begingroup$
                        Really nice proof. I have a niggle with your last statement though. In general, $2$ equations with $2$ unknowns may well have multiple solutions if they are not linear. For example, the OP mentions isosceles triangles, where the triangles $(8,8,12)$ and $(6,11,11)$ have the same perimeter and area even though isosceles triangles are also parametrised by two variables. Of course, in your case you know the sum and product of $a$ and $b$, which is a particularly nice pair of equations well known to have a symmetric pair of solutions.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Jaap Scherphuis
                        15 hours ago






                        $begingroup$
                        Really nice proof. I have a niggle with your last statement though. In general, $2$ equations with $2$ unknowns may well have multiple solutions if they are not linear. For example, the OP mentions isosceles triangles, where the triangles $(8,8,12)$ and $(6,11,11)$ have the same perimeter and area even though isosceles triangles are also parametrised by two variables. Of course, in your case you know the sum and product of $a$ and $b$, which is a particularly nice pair of equations well known to have a symmetric pair of solutions.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Jaap Scherphuis
                        15 hours ago














                        $begingroup$
                        @Jaap Scherphuis -- Thank you for your comment and clarification.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dnqxt
                        15 hours ago






                        $begingroup$
                        @Jaap Scherphuis -- Thank you for your comment and clarification.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dnqxt
                        15 hours ago














                        $begingroup$
                        @Dawood ibn Kareem -- Thanks for the comment. I added in the answer the clarification made by Jaap Scherphuis.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dnqxt
                        8 hours ago




                        $begingroup$
                        @Dawood ibn Kareem -- Thanks for the comment. I added in the answer the clarification made by Jaap Scherphuis.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dnqxt
                        8 hours ago











                        5












                        $begingroup$

                        Consider a right-angled triangle with sides $a$ and $b$.

                        The hypotenuse has length $c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$.
                        Its area is $ab/2$, and perimeter is $a+b+c$.



                        I will allow $a,b,c$ to be any positive real numbers, not restrict them to positive integers.



                        Suppose we scale the triangles such that $ab=1$, (i.e. an area of $1/2$). Is it possible to have two of these triangles that are distinct but with the same perimeter?



                        We may assume that $a$ is the longer side, i.e. $a>b$, so we must have $a>1$.



                        The perimeter is
                        $$P(a) = a+b+c\ = a+b+sqrt{a^2+b^2}\ = a+frac{1}{a}+sqrt{a^2+frac{1}{a^2}}$$



                        This is an increasing function on the interval $[1,infty)$ because its derivative w.r.t. $a$ is positive for $a>1$. This is tedious to check by hand, so I used Wolfram alpha. You can however understand why this is the case by noticing that if you increase $a$, then the rate at which $a$ increases is larger than the rate at which $1/a$ decreases, and the same holds for $a^2$ versus $1/a^2$.



                        This means that there are no two values of $a$, both with $a>1$ for which you get the same perimeter.



                        Bringing it back to the original problem, it means that there are no two right-angled triangles with the same perimeter and area, unless they have the same sides. Basically, given an area and a perimeter, their two equations uniquely determine the two triangle sides because the lines those equations represent are not curved enough to intersect multiple times.





                        P.S. By the way, the OP mentioned that there are pairs of isosceles triangles with matching areas and perimeters, even when all sides and the area are integers. Two examples are:
                        $(29,29,40)$ and $(37,37,24)$,

                        and also
                        $(218,218,240)$ and $(233,233,210)$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$


















                          5












                          $begingroup$

                          Consider a right-angled triangle with sides $a$ and $b$.

                          The hypotenuse has length $c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$.
                          Its area is $ab/2$, and perimeter is $a+b+c$.



                          I will allow $a,b,c$ to be any positive real numbers, not restrict them to positive integers.



                          Suppose we scale the triangles such that $ab=1$, (i.e. an area of $1/2$). Is it possible to have two of these triangles that are distinct but with the same perimeter?



                          We may assume that $a$ is the longer side, i.e. $a>b$, so we must have $a>1$.



                          The perimeter is
                          $$P(a) = a+b+c\ = a+b+sqrt{a^2+b^2}\ = a+frac{1}{a}+sqrt{a^2+frac{1}{a^2}}$$



                          This is an increasing function on the interval $[1,infty)$ because its derivative w.r.t. $a$ is positive for $a>1$. This is tedious to check by hand, so I used Wolfram alpha. You can however understand why this is the case by noticing that if you increase $a$, then the rate at which $a$ increases is larger than the rate at which $1/a$ decreases, and the same holds for $a^2$ versus $1/a^2$.



                          This means that there are no two values of $a$, both with $a>1$ for which you get the same perimeter.



                          Bringing it back to the original problem, it means that there are no two right-angled triangles with the same perimeter and area, unless they have the same sides. Basically, given an area and a perimeter, their two equations uniquely determine the two triangle sides because the lines those equations represent are not curved enough to intersect multiple times.





                          P.S. By the way, the OP mentioned that there are pairs of isosceles triangles with matching areas and perimeters, even when all sides and the area are integers. Two examples are:
                          $(29,29,40)$ and $(37,37,24)$,

                          and also
                          $(218,218,240)$ and $(233,233,210)$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$
















                            5












                            5








                            5





                            $begingroup$

                            Consider a right-angled triangle with sides $a$ and $b$.

                            The hypotenuse has length $c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$.
                            Its area is $ab/2$, and perimeter is $a+b+c$.



                            I will allow $a,b,c$ to be any positive real numbers, not restrict them to positive integers.



                            Suppose we scale the triangles such that $ab=1$, (i.e. an area of $1/2$). Is it possible to have two of these triangles that are distinct but with the same perimeter?



                            We may assume that $a$ is the longer side, i.e. $a>b$, so we must have $a>1$.



                            The perimeter is
                            $$P(a) = a+b+c\ = a+b+sqrt{a^2+b^2}\ = a+frac{1}{a}+sqrt{a^2+frac{1}{a^2}}$$



                            This is an increasing function on the interval $[1,infty)$ because its derivative w.r.t. $a$ is positive for $a>1$. This is tedious to check by hand, so I used Wolfram alpha. You can however understand why this is the case by noticing that if you increase $a$, then the rate at which $a$ increases is larger than the rate at which $1/a$ decreases, and the same holds for $a^2$ versus $1/a^2$.



                            This means that there are no two values of $a$, both with $a>1$ for which you get the same perimeter.



                            Bringing it back to the original problem, it means that there are no two right-angled triangles with the same perimeter and area, unless they have the same sides. Basically, given an area and a perimeter, their two equations uniquely determine the two triangle sides because the lines those equations represent are not curved enough to intersect multiple times.





                            P.S. By the way, the OP mentioned that there are pairs of isosceles triangles with matching areas and perimeters, even when all sides and the area are integers. Two examples are:
                            $(29,29,40)$ and $(37,37,24)$,

                            and also
                            $(218,218,240)$ and $(233,233,210)$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$



                            Consider a right-angled triangle with sides $a$ and $b$.

                            The hypotenuse has length $c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$.
                            Its area is $ab/2$, and perimeter is $a+b+c$.



                            I will allow $a,b,c$ to be any positive real numbers, not restrict them to positive integers.



                            Suppose we scale the triangles such that $ab=1$, (i.e. an area of $1/2$). Is it possible to have two of these triangles that are distinct but with the same perimeter?



                            We may assume that $a$ is the longer side, i.e. $a>b$, so we must have $a>1$.



                            The perimeter is
                            $$P(a) = a+b+c\ = a+b+sqrt{a^2+b^2}\ = a+frac{1}{a}+sqrt{a^2+frac{1}{a^2}}$$



                            This is an increasing function on the interval $[1,infty)$ because its derivative w.r.t. $a$ is positive for $a>1$. This is tedious to check by hand, so I used Wolfram alpha. You can however understand why this is the case by noticing that if you increase $a$, then the rate at which $a$ increases is larger than the rate at which $1/a$ decreases, and the same holds for $a^2$ versus $1/a^2$.



                            This means that there are no two values of $a$, both with $a>1$ for which you get the same perimeter.



                            Bringing it back to the original problem, it means that there are no two right-angled triangles with the same perimeter and area, unless they have the same sides. Basically, given an area and a perimeter, their two equations uniquely determine the two triangle sides because the lines those equations represent are not curved enough to intersect multiple times.





                            P.S. By the way, the OP mentioned that there are pairs of isosceles triangles with matching areas and perimeters, even when all sides and the area are integers. Two examples are:
                            $(29,29,40)$ and $(37,37,24)$,

                            and also
                            $(218,218,240)$ and $(233,233,210)$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited 13 hours ago

























                            answered 15 hours ago









                            Jaap ScherphuisJaap Scherphuis

                            4,337817




                            4,337817























                                4












                                $begingroup$

                                The area and the perimeter uniquely define the radius of the inscribed circle because $A=frac12Pr$, and the hypotenuse because $r=frac{P}{2}-c$. That fixes both $a+b=P-c$ and $ab=2A$ so $a$ and $b$ are also unique up to permutation, QED.






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$


















                                  4












                                  $begingroup$

                                  The area and the perimeter uniquely define the radius of the inscribed circle because $A=frac12Pr$, and the hypotenuse because $r=frac{P}{2}-c$. That fixes both $a+b=P-c$ and $ab=2A$ so $a$ and $b$ are also unique up to permutation, QED.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$
















                                    4












                                    4








                                    4





                                    $begingroup$

                                    The area and the perimeter uniquely define the radius of the inscribed circle because $A=frac12Pr$, and the hypotenuse because $r=frac{P}{2}-c$. That fixes both $a+b=P-c$ and $ab=2A$ so $a$ and $b$ are also unique up to permutation, QED.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$



                                    The area and the perimeter uniquely define the radius of the inscribed circle because $A=frac12Pr$, and the hypotenuse because $r=frac{P}{2}-c$. That fixes both $a+b=P-c$ and $ab=2A$ so $a$ and $b$ are also unique up to permutation, QED.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer














                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer








                                    edited 9 hours ago

























                                    answered 9 hours ago









                                    Roman OdaiskyRoman Odaisky

                                    23116




                                    23116























                                        2












                                        $begingroup$

                                        Long Comment:



                                        You can at least give the simple formulae for the perimeter $P$ and area $A$ of a right angle triangle.



                                        If $z^2=x^2+y^2$ is a primitive Pythagorean triangle with $x$ being the base of the triangle and $y$ being the height (due to the right angle), then $P=x+y+z$ and $A=frac{1}{2}xy$



                                        Then you can quote the formulae for primitive Pythagorean Triples, where $z=left(a^2+b^2right)$, $x=left(a^2-b^2right)$ and $y=2ab$



                                        To expand to all the non primitive Pythagorean triangles we have



                                        $$(cz)^2=(cx)^2+(cy)^2$$



                                        Therefore



                                        $$P=a(2a+2b)c$$
                                        $$A=frac{1}{2} left(a^2-b^2right)(2ab)c^2=left(a^2-b^2right)abc^2$$



                                        For two incongruent Pythagorean triangles 1 and 2 the condition is



                                        $$P_1=P_2 ;;text{and} ;; A_1=A_2$$



                                        For Perimeter:
                                        $$a_1(2a_1+2b_1)c_1=a_2(2a_2+2b_2)c_2$$
                                        $$frac{a_2+b_2}{a_1+b_1}=frac{a_1c_1}{a_2c_2}tag{1}$$
                                        For Area:
                                        $$left(a_1^2-b_1^2right)a_1b_1c_1^2=left(a_2^2-b_2^2right)a_2b_2c_2^2$$
                                        $$frac{a_2+b_2}{a_1+b_1}=frac{a_1c_1}{a_2c_2}left(frac{b_1c_1}{b_2c_2}frac{ (a_1-b_1) }{ (a_2-b_2) } right)$$



                                        Therefore combining both gives



                                        $$b_1c_1(a_1-b_1)=b_2c_2(a_2-b_2)tag{2}$$



                                        Update:



                                        Using (1) and (2) we can eliminate the variables $c_1$ and $c_2$ eventually giving
                                        $$frac{ (a_2+b_2) a_2 }{ (a_1+b_1) a_1 }=frac{ (a_2-b_2) b_2 }{ (a_1-b_1) b_1 }$$
                                        or
                                        $$frac{ (a_2+b_2) a_2 }{ (a_2-b_2) b_2 }=frac{ (a_1+b_1) a_1 }{ (a_1-b_1) b_1 }$$






                                        share|cite|improve this answer











                                        $endgroup$













                                        • $begingroup$
                                          In the version you use for primitive triples I think one needs $a,b$ odd and coprime, $a>b$ to give triples of positives. [That seems it would be known in that version…] I used the other version in my attempt, $p^2-q^2,2pq,p^2+q^2$ with $p,q$ coprime opposite parity and $p>q.$ Still didn't go to a finish in my attempts though.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – coffeemath
                                          16 hours ago






                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          updated to your version
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – James Arathoon
                                          15 hours ago
















                                        2












                                        $begingroup$

                                        Long Comment:



                                        You can at least give the simple formulae for the perimeter $P$ and area $A$ of a right angle triangle.



                                        If $z^2=x^2+y^2$ is a primitive Pythagorean triangle with $x$ being the base of the triangle and $y$ being the height (due to the right angle), then $P=x+y+z$ and $A=frac{1}{2}xy$



                                        Then you can quote the formulae for primitive Pythagorean Triples, where $z=left(a^2+b^2right)$, $x=left(a^2-b^2right)$ and $y=2ab$



                                        To expand to all the non primitive Pythagorean triangles we have



                                        $$(cz)^2=(cx)^2+(cy)^2$$



                                        Therefore



                                        $$P=a(2a+2b)c$$
                                        $$A=frac{1}{2} left(a^2-b^2right)(2ab)c^2=left(a^2-b^2right)abc^2$$



                                        For two incongruent Pythagorean triangles 1 and 2 the condition is



                                        $$P_1=P_2 ;;text{and} ;; A_1=A_2$$



                                        For Perimeter:
                                        $$a_1(2a_1+2b_1)c_1=a_2(2a_2+2b_2)c_2$$
                                        $$frac{a_2+b_2}{a_1+b_1}=frac{a_1c_1}{a_2c_2}tag{1}$$
                                        For Area:
                                        $$left(a_1^2-b_1^2right)a_1b_1c_1^2=left(a_2^2-b_2^2right)a_2b_2c_2^2$$
                                        $$frac{a_2+b_2}{a_1+b_1}=frac{a_1c_1}{a_2c_2}left(frac{b_1c_1}{b_2c_2}frac{ (a_1-b_1) }{ (a_2-b_2) } right)$$



                                        Therefore combining both gives



                                        $$b_1c_1(a_1-b_1)=b_2c_2(a_2-b_2)tag{2}$$



                                        Update:



                                        Using (1) and (2) we can eliminate the variables $c_1$ and $c_2$ eventually giving
                                        $$frac{ (a_2+b_2) a_2 }{ (a_1+b_1) a_1 }=frac{ (a_2-b_2) b_2 }{ (a_1-b_1) b_1 }$$
                                        or
                                        $$frac{ (a_2+b_2) a_2 }{ (a_2-b_2) b_2 }=frac{ (a_1+b_1) a_1 }{ (a_1-b_1) b_1 }$$






                                        share|cite|improve this answer











                                        $endgroup$













                                        • $begingroup$
                                          In the version you use for primitive triples I think one needs $a,b$ odd and coprime, $a>b$ to give triples of positives. [That seems it would be known in that version…] I used the other version in my attempt, $p^2-q^2,2pq,p^2+q^2$ with $p,q$ coprime opposite parity and $p>q.$ Still didn't go to a finish in my attempts though.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – coffeemath
                                          16 hours ago






                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          updated to your version
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – James Arathoon
                                          15 hours ago














                                        2












                                        2








                                        2





                                        $begingroup$

                                        Long Comment:



                                        You can at least give the simple formulae for the perimeter $P$ and area $A$ of a right angle triangle.



                                        If $z^2=x^2+y^2$ is a primitive Pythagorean triangle with $x$ being the base of the triangle and $y$ being the height (due to the right angle), then $P=x+y+z$ and $A=frac{1}{2}xy$



                                        Then you can quote the formulae for primitive Pythagorean Triples, where $z=left(a^2+b^2right)$, $x=left(a^2-b^2right)$ and $y=2ab$



                                        To expand to all the non primitive Pythagorean triangles we have



                                        $$(cz)^2=(cx)^2+(cy)^2$$



                                        Therefore



                                        $$P=a(2a+2b)c$$
                                        $$A=frac{1}{2} left(a^2-b^2right)(2ab)c^2=left(a^2-b^2right)abc^2$$



                                        For two incongruent Pythagorean triangles 1 and 2 the condition is



                                        $$P_1=P_2 ;;text{and} ;; A_1=A_2$$



                                        For Perimeter:
                                        $$a_1(2a_1+2b_1)c_1=a_2(2a_2+2b_2)c_2$$
                                        $$frac{a_2+b_2}{a_1+b_1}=frac{a_1c_1}{a_2c_2}tag{1}$$
                                        For Area:
                                        $$left(a_1^2-b_1^2right)a_1b_1c_1^2=left(a_2^2-b_2^2right)a_2b_2c_2^2$$
                                        $$frac{a_2+b_2}{a_1+b_1}=frac{a_1c_1}{a_2c_2}left(frac{b_1c_1}{b_2c_2}frac{ (a_1-b_1) }{ (a_2-b_2) } right)$$



                                        Therefore combining both gives



                                        $$b_1c_1(a_1-b_1)=b_2c_2(a_2-b_2)tag{2}$$



                                        Update:



                                        Using (1) and (2) we can eliminate the variables $c_1$ and $c_2$ eventually giving
                                        $$frac{ (a_2+b_2) a_2 }{ (a_1+b_1) a_1 }=frac{ (a_2-b_2) b_2 }{ (a_1-b_1) b_1 }$$
                                        or
                                        $$frac{ (a_2+b_2) a_2 }{ (a_2-b_2) b_2 }=frac{ (a_1+b_1) a_1 }{ (a_1-b_1) b_1 }$$






                                        share|cite|improve this answer











                                        $endgroup$



                                        Long Comment:



                                        You can at least give the simple formulae for the perimeter $P$ and area $A$ of a right angle triangle.



                                        If $z^2=x^2+y^2$ is a primitive Pythagorean triangle with $x$ being the base of the triangle and $y$ being the height (due to the right angle), then $P=x+y+z$ and $A=frac{1}{2}xy$



                                        Then you can quote the formulae for primitive Pythagorean Triples, where $z=left(a^2+b^2right)$, $x=left(a^2-b^2right)$ and $y=2ab$



                                        To expand to all the non primitive Pythagorean triangles we have



                                        $$(cz)^2=(cx)^2+(cy)^2$$



                                        Therefore



                                        $$P=a(2a+2b)c$$
                                        $$A=frac{1}{2} left(a^2-b^2right)(2ab)c^2=left(a^2-b^2right)abc^2$$



                                        For two incongruent Pythagorean triangles 1 and 2 the condition is



                                        $$P_1=P_2 ;;text{and} ;; A_1=A_2$$



                                        For Perimeter:
                                        $$a_1(2a_1+2b_1)c_1=a_2(2a_2+2b_2)c_2$$
                                        $$frac{a_2+b_2}{a_1+b_1}=frac{a_1c_1}{a_2c_2}tag{1}$$
                                        For Area:
                                        $$left(a_1^2-b_1^2right)a_1b_1c_1^2=left(a_2^2-b_2^2right)a_2b_2c_2^2$$
                                        $$frac{a_2+b_2}{a_1+b_1}=frac{a_1c_1}{a_2c_2}left(frac{b_1c_1}{b_2c_2}frac{ (a_1-b_1) }{ (a_2-b_2) } right)$$



                                        Therefore combining both gives



                                        $$b_1c_1(a_1-b_1)=b_2c_2(a_2-b_2)tag{2}$$



                                        Update:



                                        Using (1) and (2) we can eliminate the variables $c_1$ and $c_2$ eventually giving
                                        $$frac{ (a_2+b_2) a_2 }{ (a_1+b_1) a_1 }=frac{ (a_2-b_2) b_2 }{ (a_1-b_1) b_1 }$$
                                        or
                                        $$frac{ (a_2+b_2) a_2 }{ (a_2-b_2) b_2 }=frac{ (a_1+b_1) a_1 }{ (a_1-b_1) b_1 }$$







                                        share|cite|improve this answer














                                        share|cite|improve this answer



                                        share|cite|improve this answer








                                        edited 8 hours ago

























                                        answered 16 hours ago









                                        James ArathoonJames Arathoon

                                        1,608423




                                        1,608423












                                        • $begingroup$
                                          In the version you use for primitive triples I think one needs $a,b$ odd and coprime, $a>b$ to give triples of positives. [That seems it would be known in that version…] I used the other version in my attempt, $p^2-q^2,2pq,p^2+q^2$ with $p,q$ coprime opposite parity and $p>q.$ Still didn't go to a finish in my attempts though.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – coffeemath
                                          16 hours ago






                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          updated to your version
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – James Arathoon
                                          15 hours ago


















                                        • $begingroup$
                                          In the version you use for primitive triples I think one needs $a,b$ odd and coprime, $a>b$ to give triples of positives. [That seems it would be known in that version…] I used the other version in my attempt, $p^2-q^2,2pq,p^2+q^2$ with $p,q$ coprime opposite parity and $p>q.$ Still didn't go to a finish in my attempts though.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – coffeemath
                                          16 hours ago






                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          updated to your version
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – James Arathoon
                                          15 hours ago
















                                        $begingroup$
                                        In the version you use for primitive triples I think one needs $a,b$ odd and coprime, $a>b$ to give triples of positives. [That seems it would be known in that version…] I used the other version in my attempt, $p^2-q^2,2pq,p^2+q^2$ with $p,q$ coprime opposite parity and $p>q.$ Still didn't go to a finish in my attempts though.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – coffeemath
                                        16 hours ago




                                        $begingroup$
                                        In the version you use for primitive triples I think one needs $a,b$ odd and coprime, $a>b$ to give triples of positives. [That seems it would be known in that version…] I used the other version in my attempt, $p^2-q^2,2pq,p^2+q^2$ with $p,q$ coprime opposite parity and $p>q.$ Still didn't go to a finish in my attempts though.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – coffeemath
                                        16 hours ago




                                        1




                                        1




                                        $begingroup$
                                        updated to your version
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – James Arathoon
                                        15 hours ago




                                        $begingroup$
                                        updated to your version
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – James Arathoon
                                        15 hours ago


















                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3182185%2fare-there-incongruent-pythagorean-triangles-with-the-same-perimeter-and-same-are%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                                        He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                                        Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029