Who coined the term “madman theory”?












10















Madman theory revolves around the idea of appearing more "crazy" than one actually is.



It is actually a signaling game in its simplest form. At least nowadays such games are exemplified with a "crazy" (non-accommodating) player type among other scenarios.



I wonder however: who coined the term "madman theory"? It appears the term gained popularity referring to Nixon's approach to foreign policy, but it was probably a label he didn't coin himself. It sounds more like his critics would have come up with it.



Google ngram finds some uses before Nixon's time as president, apparently:



enter image description here



I don't know if these early uses were with the same meaning though.










share|improve this question























  • Aside: Based just on the graph, I'd venture to guess that the usage peaked in relation to Reagan's anti-communist stance, despite having existed earlier. It could be that the creation of dedicated news television networks (e.g. CNN was founded in 1980) and political shows also contributed.

    – jpmc26
    2 hours ago


















10















Madman theory revolves around the idea of appearing more "crazy" than one actually is.



It is actually a signaling game in its simplest form. At least nowadays such games are exemplified with a "crazy" (non-accommodating) player type among other scenarios.



I wonder however: who coined the term "madman theory"? It appears the term gained popularity referring to Nixon's approach to foreign policy, but it was probably a label he didn't coin himself. It sounds more like his critics would have come up with it.



Google ngram finds some uses before Nixon's time as president, apparently:



enter image description here



I don't know if these early uses were with the same meaning though.










share|improve this question























  • Aside: Based just on the graph, I'd venture to guess that the usage peaked in relation to Reagan's anti-communist stance, despite having existed earlier. It could be that the creation of dedicated news television networks (e.g. CNN was founded in 1980) and political shows also contributed.

    – jpmc26
    2 hours ago
















10












10








10


3






Madman theory revolves around the idea of appearing more "crazy" than one actually is.



It is actually a signaling game in its simplest form. At least nowadays such games are exemplified with a "crazy" (non-accommodating) player type among other scenarios.



I wonder however: who coined the term "madman theory"? It appears the term gained popularity referring to Nixon's approach to foreign policy, but it was probably a label he didn't coin himself. It sounds more like his critics would have come up with it.



Google ngram finds some uses before Nixon's time as president, apparently:



enter image description here



I don't know if these early uses were with the same meaning though.










share|improve this question














Madman theory revolves around the idea of appearing more "crazy" than one actually is.



It is actually a signaling game in its simplest form. At least nowadays such games are exemplified with a "crazy" (non-accommodating) player type among other scenarios.



I wonder however: who coined the term "madman theory"? It appears the term gained popularity referring to Nixon's approach to foreign policy, but it was probably a label he didn't coin himself. It sounds more like his critics would have come up with it.



Google ngram finds some uses before Nixon's time as president, apparently:



enter image description here



I don't know if these early uses were with the same meaning though.







political-theory terminology history game-theory






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 16 hours ago









FizzFizz

14.6k23795




14.6k23795













  • Aside: Based just on the graph, I'd venture to guess that the usage peaked in relation to Reagan's anti-communist stance, despite having existed earlier. It could be that the creation of dedicated news television networks (e.g. CNN was founded in 1980) and political shows also contributed.

    – jpmc26
    2 hours ago





















  • Aside: Based just on the graph, I'd venture to guess that the usage peaked in relation to Reagan's anti-communist stance, despite having existed earlier. It could be that the creation of dedicated news television networks (e.g. CNN was founded in 1980) and political shows also contributed.

    – jpmc26
    2 hours ago



















Aside: Based just on the graph, I'd venture to guess that the usage peaked in relation to Reagan's anti-communist stance, despite having existed earlier. It could be that the creation of dedicated news television networks (e.g. CNN was founded in 1980) and political shows also contributed.

– jpmc26
2 hours ago







Aside: Based just on the graph, I'd venture to guess that the usage peaked in relation to Reagan's anti-communist stance, despite having existed earlier. It could be that the creation of dedicated news television networks (e.g. CNN was founded in 1980) and political shows also contributed.

– jpmc26
2 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















13














This seems to be coming from Haldeman:




While Nixon sought support from the silent majority, diplomats were at work on both North and South Viet- namese. Kissinger continued his talks with Le Duc Tho and indicated that his boss might be mentally unhinged. Nixon himself carefully cultivated the fears that he might go to irrational lengths to get his way. Chief of Staff Haldeman later dubbed this procedure the “madman strategy”: if the North Vietnamese doubted that Nixon felt bound by conventional restraints, they would sign before risking destruction. While Kissinger played upon these fears, Haig returned to Thieu in Saigon with some brutally frank messages. (p303)



Robert D. Schulzinger: "U.S. Diplomacy Since 1900", Oxford University Press: Oxford New York, 52002.




Or




Kimball delved into Nixon’s “madman strategy,” a term that came from chief of staff H.R. Haldeman’s recollection that Nixon thought he could intimidate North Vietnam by making them believe he would escalate the war relentlessly.
(Schulzinger "Nixon & Kissinger", p369)



The latter primarily consisted in the continuation of current ground operations, the escalation of air operations, and what Nixon secretly called “the madman theory” – his version of brinkmanship.
(Kimball "Vietnam War", p385)



Another element in the Nixon-Kissinger strategy for Vietnam, the madman theory, was long neglected in Nixonian historiography. The first public mention of this stratagem of coercion was in White House chief-of-staff H. R. Haldeman’s memoir, The Ends of Power (Haldeman 1978: 82–3). With a few exceptions (Hersh 1983; Isaacson 1992), however, works published before 1998 often ignored, doubted, or rejected Haldeman’s testimony (Greenstein 1983; Hoff 1994; Immerman 1991). Some historians and journalists suggested that Haldeman’s assisting author, Joseph DiMona, was responsible for inserting the story about the madman theory in the memoir and that Haldeman later retracted his association with it. But Haldeman affirmed Nixon’s embrace of the madman theory in a 1990 interview with Walter Isaacson (1992; see also Summers 2000). Haldeman’s comments, the memoirs of other Nixon aides, Nixon’s own semi-private statements, and declassified documents and tapes serve to confirm Nixon’s faith in and implementation of the madman theory and of Kissinger’s collaboration in the project (Kimball 1998, 2004).
(Schulzinger, p 386)



Melvin Small: "A Companion to Richard M. Nixon", Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, 2011.




This is of course only focussing on Nixon's strategy as that of a madman.
Previous examples of the term not only foreshadow the Vietnam/Cold War use:



Brownson's review, 1845:




We are not disposed to undertake the refutation of this theory, which may be termed the demoniacal, or madman's theory, for none but a madman will attempt to reason a mad man out of his crotchets.




The New York Times Magazine, 1968 (tiny snippet view talking about Asian/American politics; alternative view)



Saturday Review 1963:




A fourth type of accidental war is what has sometimes been called the "madman" theory.




The re-adaptation of this political behaviour as deliberate tactic seems to be even earlier attested:




enter image description here

Paul Alan Lawrence Smith: "Politics and Social Life: An Introduction to Political Behavior", Houghton Mifflin, 1963.




Even more curious might be that after all, this type of game-theory application is only fully appreciated if you read it 'in the Russian original':




In the late fifties, Schelling, Morgenstern, Kissinger, and Ellsberg (as well as others) were part of a circle of strategic thinkers centered at Harvard and RAND who were concerned mainly with the problem of the instability of the nuclear arms race and nuclear deterrence.5 They recognized, analyzed, understood, and criticized the irrationality theory. Although they believed in the efficacy of force in foreign policy, in the late fifties none of these civilian strategists, as far as I can discern, actually advocated a madman strategy of ambiguity, irrationality, uncertainty, unpredictability, or excessive force and ruthlessness as later practiced by Nixon. (Kissinger converted to the madman theory while working for Nixon; Schelling had a falling out with Kissinger over his and Nixon’s conduct of the Vietnam War.)[…]



Even if I am wrong and these “wizards of Armageddon” had indeed advocated madman strategies, and even though they may have been the first game theorists and civilian deterrent strategists to discuss the madman theory, they had not invented or originated it, as some writers have claimed or implied.



I have argued elsewhere that the madman theory is as old as “civilization,” if not humanity itself, and that the madman theory’s inventors and practitioners were political-military decision makers:




The principle of instilling fear by threatening excessive force is as ancient as statecraft, war, and terror. Demanding the return of a hostage, the second millennium bce Hittite King Mursli, for example, issued this warning . . . to the hostage-taker: “I will come and destroy you along with your land.” Over three thousand years later, the principle became an essential component of [strategic bombing and] “atomic diplomacy.” While serving as vice president at the dawn of the nuclear age—the period in which Nixon had come of age as a policymaker and strategist—he learned about the “uncertainty principle,” which was one of the principles that lay at the heart of the atomic “brinkmanship” or “massive retaliation” strategy of President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Secretary of State John Foster Dulles.7




Nixon had also learned from Nikita Khrushchev, who, Nixon claimed, was “the most brilliant world leader I have ever met,” because he nurtured a reputation for rashness and unpredictability that “scared the hell out of people.” 8



Jeffrey Kimball: "Did Thomas C. Schelling Invent the Madman Theory?", History News Network, George Washington University, (2019?)




The above gives a gist of what might be called a zeitgeist.



Who invented the strategy, who named it first, who publicised it so widely that now everyone knows its meaning?




When Nixon coined the name Madman Theory for his version of the principle of threatening and signaling the use of excessive force, he did not have to look far for the title. The words mad, madness, and madman in reference to nuclear policy and strategy were commonplace in the world of the 1950s and 1960s. Critics of a nuclear deterrent strategy based on massive retaliation or flexible response often used the word mad or similar language to describe the international arms regime. These included moviemakers, novelists, and scientists, as well as grassroots activists in the disarmament movement who opposed the nuclear arms race, nuclear testing, and massive retaliation for impoverishing economies, causing cancerous radioactive fallout, and risking global doom.17



Ironically and paradoxically, the practitioners of nuclear deterrence also invoked madness in reference to the system. Eisenhower referred to a US-USSR nuclear war as “insane” in correspondence with Winston Churchill in 1956.18 Admiral Arleigh Burke, chief of naval operations under President Eisenhower and an advocate of “minimal deterrence” based on submarine-launched ballistic missiles, said in 1957 that the United States had to be prepared “to counter any madmen who would resort” to all-out nuclear war.19 Robert McNamara, President Kennedy’s secretary of state, used the word in 1967 in describing the “mad momentum intrinsic to the development of all new nuclear weaponry.”20 On the other side of the Cold War divide, Soviet general secretary Khrushchev regularly claimed that “some madmen in the camp of the imperialists threaten the world with their atomic and hydrogen bombs.… Only a madman would want war.” Yet at other times, he could issue mad warnings of his own: “Should any madman launch an attack on our state or on other Socialist states we would be able literally to wipe the country or countries which attack us off the face of the earth.”21
Reinforcing the meme of madness during the 1960s was “assured destruction” (AD), a strategic doctrine that Secretary McNamara formulated in late 1963 to describe “an actual and credible second-strike capability” (a retaliatory ability to destroy at least 50 percent of the Soviets’ industrial capacity, 30 percent of their population, and 150 of their cities).22 As the term became public, many observers regarded assured destruction as yet another name for mutual deterrence.23 Skeptics, such as journalist Tom Wicker, voiced their objections to the “Strangelovish world of megatonnage and ‘assured destruction’” and the surrealistic, rationally irrational logic of “the terrible balance that renders both Soviet and American nuclear power useless for anything but mutual destruction.”24 By at least 1968, McNamara was publicly referring to assured destruction as “mutual assured destruction,”25 although it was apparently not until May 1971 that Donald G. Brennan, former president of the Hudson Institute and an advocate of missile defense, coined the satiric acronym MAD in New York Times op-eds.



Jeffrey P Kimball & William Burr: "Nixon's Nuclear Specter: The Secret Alert of 1969, Madman Diplomacy, and the Vietnam War", Modern War Studies, University Press of Kansas: Lawrence, 2015.




That would make the theory/strategy itself 'older than dirt', floating around in the 50s with increased attention from cold war strategists. Then Nixon seemed to have adopted that theory in this phrasing to describe his own intentions in the late 60s internally – while others still used this phrase interchangeably to describe real madmen's behaviours and outcomes. But only after Haldeman's memoirs were published the general public took over the current meaning of 'most probably make-believe madmanhood' in international, political relations.



That makes for quite a few cooks –– or 'fathers', 'coining' the term: Schelling, Morgenstern, Kissinger, Ellsberg, Nixon and Haldeman should be regarded as responsible for the current main meaning and understanding of "madman theory".






share|improve this answer


























  • Well, wikipedia says Haldeman said Nixon told him "I call it the Madman Theory, Bob. "

    – Fizz
    16 hours ago











  • It does sound plausible that Haldeman fist used "madman strategy" with this meaning. There are only two Google Books hits before 1980 on that phrase, all with a different meaning. See links from ngram

    – Fizz
    15 hours ago













  • I think that NYT piece that was with a somewhat different meaning; the "madman theory" was defined as "We must prepare against the enemy's capabilities, not his intentions". in that piece.

    – Fizz
    15 hours ago








  • 3





    Coincidentally, 'madman' is used to describe a corresponding strategy in poker which is a game Nixon was quite skilled at. I don't know when it started being used so it may be nothing more than that, a coincidence.

    – JimmyJames
    12 hours ago











  • The closely related idiom, "crazy like a fox" dates back to at least 1896. english.stackexchange.com/questions/241994/…

    – ohwilleke
    4 hours ago





















4














There's a bit more interesting theorizing in Hersh's book The Price of Power how the theory may have come to the attention of Nixon.




It is highly likely that Kissinger was responsible for Nixon's adoption of the phrase the "the madman theory". In 1959, Ellsberg had present two lectures to Kissinger's Harvard seminar on the conscious political use of irrational military threats. Ellsberg called the theory "The Political Uses of Madness". In essence he described a problem in bargaining theory: what to do when the available threat is so extreme or costly as to make it seem unlikely that a sane and reasonable person would carry it out. On the other hand, since the threat is so extreme, Ellsberg noted, it does not have to be very likely to be used in order to be effective, particularly if the nation posing the threat is making only moderate negotiating demands. Ellsberg postulated that one way of making the threat somehow credible--which, in this case, was all that would be necessary--would be for the person making the threat to appear not to be fully rational. In effect, and application this was implicit in Kissinger's Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy, which advocated among other things, a "strategy of ambiguity" in connection with United States use of of tactical nuclear weapons. In his Harvard lecture, Ellsberg cites as his example Hitler's conscious use of his reputation as a madman to win victoires without firing a shot in the Rhineland, Austria and Munich before World War II. As his model of Hitler indicated, Ellsberg regarded such a strategy as reckless and utterly dangerous for the world, but a possibility to be anticipated from opponents because, in connection with a nuclear threat, it might work.




Wikipedia says however that




In Nixon's Vietnam War, Kimball argues that Nixon arrived at the strategy independently, as a result of practical experience and observation of Dwight D. Eisenhower's handling of the Korean War.




YMMV. There's more than one plausible route how Nixon came up with the term and/or the idea.



P.S.: One more interesting thing: Lang Lang's answer (quoting Kimball) says Nixon also learned from Khrushchev. But, interestingly, Khrushchev is also briefly discussed as an example in the final page of Ellsberg's 1959 lecture:




For if Hitler was mad, his theory was not. "The difference between Munich and now," Khrushchev said recently (March, 1959) "is that I am not Adolph Hitler." (He didn't feel a need to distinguish himself from Chamberlain.)







share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    What do you mean by "YMMV", "Your mileage may vary"? How is that statement applicable here?

    – Captain Man
    8 hours ago











  • @CaptainMan: because we can't really know how Nixon came up with it (both as a term and as a notion.) The accounts differ between sources. One interesting thing is Lang Lang's answer (quoting Kimball) says Nixon (or Kissinger) learned from Kruschev. But, interestingly, Kruschev is also briefly discussed as an example in the final page of Ellsberg's 1959 lecture.

    – Fizz
    1 hour ago














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40447%2fwho-coined-the-term-madman-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









13














This seems to be coming from Haldeman:




While Nixon sought support from the silent majority, diplomats were at work on both North and South Viet- namese. Kissinger continued his talks with Le Duc Tho and indicated that his boss might be mentally unhinged. Nixon himself carefully cultivated the fears that he might go to irrational lengths to get his way. Chief of Staff Haldeman later dubbed this procedure the “madman strategy”: if the North Vietnamese doubted that Nixon felt bound by conventional restraints, they would sign before risking destruction. While Kissinger played upon these fears, Haig returned to Thieu in Saigon with some brutally frank messages. (p303)



Robert D. Schulzinger: "U.S. Diplomacy Since 1900", Oxford University Press: Oxford New York, 52002.




Or




Kimball delved into Nixon’s “madman strategy,” a term that came from chief of staff H.R. Haldeman’s recollection that Nixon thought he could intimidate North Vietnam by making them believe he would escalate the war relentlessly.
(Schulzinger "Nixon & Kissinger", p369)



The latter primarily consisted in the continuation of current ground operations, the escalation of air operations, and what Nixon secretly called “the madman theory” – his version of brinkmanship.
(Kimball "Vietnam War", p385)



Another element in the Nixon-Kissinger strategy for Vietnam, the madman theory, was long neglected in Nixonian historiography. The first public mention of this stratagem of coercion was in White House chief-of-staff H. R. Haldeman’s memoir, The Ends of Power (Haldeman 1978: 82–3). With a few exceptions (Hersh 1983; Isaacson 1992), however, works published before 1998 often ignored, doubted, or rejected Haldeman’s testimony (Greenstein 1983; Hoff 1994; Immerman 1991). Some historians and journalists suggested that Haldeman’s assisting author, Joseph DiMona, was responsible for inserting the story about the madman theory in the memoir and that Haldeman later retracted his association with it. But Haldeman affirmed Nixon’s embrace of the madman theory in a 1990 interview with Walter Isaacson (1992; see also Summers 2000). Haldeman’s comments, the memoirs of other Nixon aides, Nixon’s own semi-private statements, and declassified documents and tapes serve to confirm Nixon’s faith in and implementation of the madman theory and of Kissinger’s collaboration in the project (Kimball 1998, 2004).
(Schulzinger, p 386)



Melvin Small: "A Companion to Richard M. Nixon", Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, 2011.




This is of course only focussing on Nixon's strategy as that of a madman.
Previous examples of the term not only foreshadow the Vietnam/Cold War use:



Brownson's review, 1845:




We are not disposed to undertake the refutation of this theory, which may be termed the demoniacal, or madman's theory, for none but a madman will attempt to reason a mad man out of his crotchets.




The New York Times Magazine, 1968 (tiny snippet view talking about Asian/American politics; alternative view)



Saturday Review 1963:




A fourth type of accidental war is what has sometimes been called the "madman" theory.




The re-adaptation of this political behaviour as deliberate tactic seems to be even earlier attested:




enter image description here

Paul Alan Lawrence Smith: "Politics and Social Life: An Introduction to Political Behavior", Houghton Mifflin, 1963.




Even more curious might be that after all, this type of game-theory application is only fully appreciated if you read it 'in the Russian original':




In the late fifties, Schelling, Morgenstern, Kissinger, and Ellsberg (as well as others) were part of a circle of strategic thinkers centered at Harvard and RAND who were concerned mainly with the problem of the instability of the nuclear arms race and nuclear deterrence.5 They recognized, analyzed, understood, and criticized the irrationality theory. Although they believed in the efficacy of force in foreign policy, in the late fifties none of these civilian strategists, as far as I can discern, actually advocated a madman strategy of ambiguity, irrationality, uncertainty, unpredictability, or excessive force and ruthlessness as later practiced by Nixon. (Kissinger converted to the madman theory while working for Nixon; Schelling had a falling out with Kissinger over his and Nixon’s conduct of the Vietnam War.)[…]



Even if I am wrong and these “wizards of Armageddon” had indeed advocated madman strategies, and even though they may have been the first game theorists and civilian deterrent strategists to discuss the madman theory, they had not invented or originated it, as some writers have claimed or implied.



I have argued elsewhere that the madman theory is as old as “civilization,” if not humanity itself, and that the madman theory’s inventors and practitioners were political-military decision makers:




The principle of instilling fear by threatening excessive force is as ancient as statecraft, war, and terror. Demanding the return of a hostage, the second millennium bce Hittite King Mursli, for example, issued this warning . . . to the hostage-taker: “I will come and destroy you along with your land.” Over three thousand years later, the principle became an essential component of [strategic bombing and] “atomic diplomacy.” While serving as vice president at the dawn of the nuclear age—the period in which Nixon had come of age as a policymaker and strategist—he learned about the “uncertainty principle,” which was one of the principles that lay at the heart of the atomic “brinkmanship” or “massive retaliation” strategy of President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Secretary of State John Foster Dulles.7




Nixon had also learned from Nikita Khrushchev, who, Nixon claimed, was “the most brilliant world leader I have ever met,” because he nurtured a reputation for rashness and unpredictability that “scared the hell out of people.” 8



Jeffrey Kimball: "Did Thomas C. Schelling Invent the Madman Theory?", History News Network, George Washington University, (2019?)




The above gives a gist of what might be called a zeitgeist.



Who invented the strategy, who named it first, who publicised it so widely that now everyone knows its meaning?




When Nixon coined the name Madman Theory for his version of the principle of threatening and signaling the use of excessive force, he did not have to look far for the title. The words mad, madness, and madman in reference to nuclear policy and strategy were commonplace in the world of the 1950s and 1960s. Critics of a nuclear deterrent strategy based on massive retaliation or flexible response often used the word mad or similar language to describe the international arms regime. These included moviemakers, novelists, and scientists, as well as grassroots activists in the disarmament movement who opposed the nuclear arms race, nuclear testing, and massive retaliation for impoverishing economies, causing cancerous radioactive fallout, and risking global doom.17



Ironically and paradoxically, the practitioners of nuclear deterrence also invoked madness in reference to the system. Eisenhower referred to a US-USSR nuclear war as “insane” in correspondence with Winston Churchill in 1956.18 Admiral Arleigh Burke, chief of naval operations under President Eisenhower and an advocate of “minimal deterrence” based on submarine-launched ballistic missiles, said in 1957 that the United States had to be prepared “to counter any madmen who would resort” to all-out nuclear war.19 Robert McNamara, President Kennedy’s secretary of state, used the word in 1967 in describing the “mad momentum intrinsic to the development of all new nuclear weaponry.”20 On the other side of the Cold War divide, Soviet general secretary Khrushchev regularly claimed that “some madmen in the camp of the imperialists threaten the world with their atomic and hydrogen bombs.… Only a madman would want war.” Yet at other times, he could issue mad warnings of his own: “Should any madman launch an attack on our state or on other Socialist states we would be able literally to wipe the country or countries which attack us off the face of the earth.”21
Reinforcing the meme of madness during the 1960s was “assured destruction” (AD), a strategic doctrine that Secretary McNamara formulated in late 1963 to describe “an actual and credible second-strike capability” (a retaliatory ability to destroy at least 50 percent of the Soviets’ industrial capacity, 30 percent of their population, and 150 of their cities).22 As the term became public, many observers regarded assured destruction as yet another name for mutual deterrence.23 Skeptics, such as journalist Tom Wicker, voiced their objections to the “Strangelovish world of megatonnage and ‘assured destruction’” and the surrealistic, rationally irrational logic of “the terrible balance that renders both Soviet and American nuclear power useless for anything but mutual destruction.”24 By at least 1968, McNamara was publicly referring to assured destruction as “mutual assured destruction,”25 although it was apparently not until May 1971 that Donald G. Brennan, former president of the Hudson Institute and an advocate of missile defense, coined the satiric acronym MAD in New York Times op-eds.



Jeffrey P Kimball & William Burr: "Nixon's Nuclear Specter: The Secret Alert of 1969, Madman Diplomacy, and the Vietnam War", Modern War Studies, University Press of Kansas: Lawrence, 2015.




That would make the theory/strategy itself 'older than dirt', floating around in the 50s with increased attention from cold war strategists. Then Nixon seemed to have adopted that theory in this phrasing to describe his own intentions in the late 60s internally – while others still used this phrase interchangeably to describe real madmen's behaviours and outcomes. But only after Haldeman's memoirs were published the general public took over the current meaning of 'most probably make-believe madmanhood' in international, political relations.



That makes for quite a few cooks –– or 'fathers', 'coining' the term: Schelling, Morgenstern, Kissinger, Ellsberg, Nixon and Haldeman should be regarded as responsible for the current main meaning and understanding of "madman theory".






share|improve this answer


























  • Well, wikipedia says Haldeman said Nixon told him "I call it the Madman Theory, Bob. "

    – Fizz
    16 hours ago











  • It does sound plausible that Haldeman fist used "madman strategy" with this meaning. There are only two Google Books hits before 1980 on that phrase, all with a different meaning. See links from ngram

    – Fizz
    15 hours ago













  • I think that NYT piece that was with a somewhat different meaning; the "madman theory" was defined as "We must prepare against the enemy's capabilities, not his intentions". in that piece.

    – Fizz
    15 hours ago








  • 3





    Coincidentally, 'madman' is used to describe a corresponding strategy in poker which is a game Nixon was quite skilled at. I don't know when it started being used so it may be nothing more than that, a coincidence.

    – JimmyJames
    12 hours ago











  • The closely related idiom, "crazy like a fox" dates back to at least 1896. english.stackexchange.com/questions/241994/…

    – ohwilleke
    4 hours ago


















13














This seems to be coming from Haldeman:




While Nixon sought support from the silent majority, diplomats were at work on both North and South Viet- namese. Kissinger continued his talks with Le Duc Tho and indicated that his boss might be mentally unhinged. Nixon himself carefully cultivated the fears that he might go to irrational lengths to get his way. Chief of Staff Haldeman later dubbed this procedure the “madman strategy”: if the North Vietnamese doubted that Nixon felt bound by conventional restraints, they would sign before risking destruction. While Kissinger played upon these fears, Haig returned to Thieu in Saigon with some brutally frank messages. (p303)



Robert D. Schulzinger: "U.S. Diplomacy Since 1900", Oxford University Press: Oxford New York, 52002.




Or




Kimball delved into Nixon’s “madman strategy,” a term that came from chief of staff H.R. Haldeman’s recollection that Nixon thought he could intimidate North Vietnam by making them believe he would escalate the war relentlessly.
(Schulzinger "Nixon & Kissinger", p369)



The latter primarily consisted in the continuation of current ground operations, the escalation of air operations, and what Nixon secretly called “the madman theory” – his version of brinkmanship.
(Kimball "Vietnam War", p385)



Another element in the Nixon-Kissinger strategy for Vietnam, the madman theory, was long neglected in Nixonian historiography. The first public mention of this stratagem of coercion was in White House chief-of-staff H. R. Haldeman’s memoir, The Ends of Power (Haldeman 1978: 82–3). With a few exceptions (Hersh 1983; Isaacson 1992), however, works published before 1998 often ignored, doubted, or rejected Haldeman’s testimony (Greenstein 1983; Hoff 1994; Immerman 1991). Some historians and journalists suggested that Haldeman’s assisting author, Joseph DiMona, was responsible for inserting the story about the madman theory in the memoir and that Haldeman later retracted his association with it. But Haldeman affirmed Nixon’s embrace of the madman theory in a 1990 interview with Walter Isaacson (1992; see also Summers 2000). Haldeman’s comments, the memoirs of other Nixon aides, Nixon’s own semi-private statements, and declassified documents and tapes serve to confirm Nixon’s faith in and implementation of the madman theory and of Kissinger’s collaboration in the project (Kimball 1998, 2004).
(Schulzinger, p 386)



Melvin Small: "A Companion to Richard M. Nixon", Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, 2011.




This is of course only focussing on Nixon's strategy as that of a madman.
Previous examples of the term not only foreshadow the Vietnam/Cold War use:



Brownson's review, 1845:




We are not disposed to undertake the refutation of this theory, which may be termed the demoniacal, or madman's theory, for none but a madman will attempt to reason a mad man out of his crotchets.




The New York Times Magazine, 1968 (tiny snippet view talking about Asian/American politics; alternative view)



Saturday Review 1963:




A fourth type of accidental war is what has sometimes been called the "madman" theory.




The re-adaptation of this political behaviour as deliberate tactic seems to be even earlier attested:




enter image description here

Paul Alan Lawrence Smith: "Politics and Social Life: An Introduction to Political Behavior", Houghton Mifflin, 1963.




Even more curious might be that after all, this type of game-theory application is only fully appreciated if you read it 'in the Russian original':




In the late fifties, Schelling, Morgenstern, Kissinger, and Ellsberg (as well as others) were part of a circle of strategic thinkers centered at Harvard and RAND who were concerned mainly with the problem of the instability of the nuclear arms race and nuclear deterrence.5 They recognized, analyzed, understood, and criticized the irrationality theory. Although they believed in the efficacy of force in foreign policy, in the late fifties none of these civilian strategists, as far as I can discern, actually advocated a madman strategy of ambiguity, irrationality, uncertainty, unpredictability, or excessive force and ruthlessness as later practiced by Nixon. (Kissinger converted to the madman theory while working for Nixon; Schelling had a falling out with Kissinger over his and Nixon’s conduct of the Vietnam War.)[…]



Even if I am wrong and these “wizards of Armageddon” had indeed advocated madman strategies, and even though they may have been the first game theorists and civilian deterrent strategists to discuss the madman theory, they had not invented or originated it, as some writers have claimed or implied.



I have argued elsewhere that the madman theory is as old as “civilization,” if not humanity itself, and that the madman theory’s inventors and practitioners were political-military decision makers:




The principle of instilling fear by threatening excessive force is as ancient as statecraft, war, and terror. Demanding the return of a hostage, the second millennium bce Hittite King Mursli, for example, issued this warning . . . to the hostage-taker: “I will come and destroy you along with your land.” Over three thousand years later, the principle became an essential component of [strategic bombing and] “atomic diplomacy.” While serving as vice president at the dawn of the nuclear age—the period in which Nixon had come of age as a policymaker and strategist—he learned about the “uncertainty principle,” which was one of the principles that lay at the heart of the atomic “brinkmanship” or “massive retaliation” strategy of President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Secretary of State John Foster Dulles.7




Nixon had also learned from Nikita Khrushchev, who, Nixon claimed, was “the most brilliant world leader I have ever met,” because he nurtured a reputation for rashness and unpredictability that “scared the hell out of people.” 8



Jeffrey Kimball: "Did Thomas C. Schelling Invent the Madman Theory?", History News Network, George Washington University, (2019?)




The above gives a gist of what might be called a zeitgeist.



Who invented the strategy, who named it first, who publicised it so widely that now everyone knows its meaning?




When Nixon coined the name Madman Theory for his version of the principle of threatening and signaling the use of excessive force, he did not have to look far for the title. The words mad, madness, and madman in reference to nuclear policy and strategy were commonplace in the world of the 1950s and 1960s. Critics of a nuclear deterrent strategy based on massive retaliation or flexible response often used the word mad or similar language to describe the international arms regime. These included moviemakers, novelists, and scientists, as well as grassroots activists in the disarmament movement who opposed the nuclear arms race, nuclear testing, and massive retaliation for impoverishing economies, causing cancerous radioactive fallout, and risking global doom.17



Ironically and paradoxically, the practitioners of nuclear deterrence also invoked madness in reference to the system. Eisenhower referred to a US-USSR nuclear war as “insane” in correspondence with Winston Churchill in 1956.18 Admiral Arleigh Burke, chief of naval operations under President Eisenhower and an advocate of “minimal deterrence” based on submarine-launched ballistic missiles, said in 1957 that the United States had to be prepared “to counter any madmen who would resort” to all-out nuclear war.19 Robert McNamara, President Kennedy’s secretary of state, used the word in 1967 in describing the “mad momentum intrinsic to the development of all new nuclear weaponry.”20 On the other side of the Cold War divide, Soviet general secretary Khrushchev regularly claimed that “some madmen in the camp of the imperialists threaten the world with their atomic and hydrogen bombs.… Only a madman would want war.” Yet at other times, he could issue mad warnings of his own: “Should any madman launch an attack on our state or on other Socialist states we would be able literally to wipe the country or countries which attack us off the face of the earth.”21
Reinforcing the meme of madness during the 1960s was “assured destruction” (AD), a strategic doctrine that Secretary McNamara formulated in late 1963 to describe “an actual and credible second-strike capability” (a retaliatory ability to destroy at least 50 percent of the Soviets’ industrial capacity, 30 percent of their population, and 150 of their cities).22 As the term became public, many observers regarded assured destruction as yet another name for mutual deterrence.23 Skeptics, such as journalist Tom Wicker, voiced their objections to the “Strangelovish world of megatonnage and ‘assured destruction’” and the surrealistic, rationally irrational logic of “the terrible balance that renders both Soviet and American nuclear power useless for anything but mutual destruction.”24 By at least 1968, McNamara was publicly referring to assured destruction as “mutual assured destruction,”25 although it was apparently not until May 1971 that Donald G. Brennan, former president of the Hudson Institute and an advocate of missile defense, coined the satiric acronym MAD in New York Times op-eds.



Jeffrey P Kimball & William Burr: "Nixon's Nuclear Specter: The Secret Alert of 1969, Madman Diplomacy, and the Vietnam War", Modern War Studies, University Press of Kansas: Lawrence, 2015.




That would make the theory/strategy itself 'older than dirt', floating around in the 50s with increased attention from cold war strategists. Then Nixon seemed to have adopted that theory in this phrasing to describe his own intentions in the late 60s internally – while others still used this phrase interchangeably to describe real madmen's behaviours and outcomes. But only after Haldeman's memoirs were published the general public took over the current meaning of 'most probably make-believe madmanhood' in international, political relations.



That makes for quite a few cooks –– or 'fathers', 'coining' the term: Schelling, Morgenstern, Kissinger, Ellsberg, Nixon and Haldeman should be regarded as responsible for the current main meaning and understanding of "madman theory".






share|improve this answer


























  • Well, wikipedia says Haldeman said Nixon told him "I call it the Madman Theory, Bob. "

    – Fizz
    16 hours ago











  • It does sound plausible that Haldeman fist used "madman strategy" with this meaning. There are only two Google Books hits before 1980 on that phrase, all with a different meaning. See links from ngram

    – Fizz
    15 hours ago













  • I think that NYT piece that was with a somewhat different meaning; the "madman theory" was defined as "We must prepare against the enemy's capabilities, not his intentions". in that piece.

    – Fizz
    15 hours ago








  • 3





    Coincidentally, 'madman' is used to describe a corresponding strategy in poker which is a game Nixon was quite skilled at. I don't know when it started being used so it may be nothing more than that, a coincidence.

    – JimmyJames
    12 hours ago











  • The closely related idiom, "crazy like a fox" dates back to at least 1896. english.stackexchange.com/questions/241994/…

    – ohwilleke
    4 hours ago
















13












13








13







This seems to be coming from Haldeman:




While Nixon sought support from the silent majority, diplomats were at work on both North and South Viet- namese. Kissinger continued his talks with Le Duc Tho and indicated that his boss might be mentally unhinged. Nixon himself carefully cultivated the fears that he might go to irrational lengths to get his way. Chief of Staff Haldeman later dubbed this procedure the “madman strategy”: if the North Vietnamese doubted that Nixon felt bound by conventional restraints, they would sign before risking destruction. While Kissinger played upon these fears, Haig returned to Thieu in Saigon with some brutally frank messages. (p303)



Robert D. Schulzinger: "U.S. Diplomacy Since 1900", Oxford University Press: Oxford New York, 52002.




Or




Kimball delved into Nixon’s “madman strategy,” a term that came from chief of staff H.R. Haldeman’s recollection that Nixon thought he could intimidate North Vietnam by making them believe he would escalate the war relentlessly.
(Schulzinger "Nixon & Kissinger", p369)



The latter primarily consisted in the continuation of current ground operations, the escalation of air operations, and what Nixon secretly called “the madman theory” – his version of brinkmanship.
(Kimball "Vietnam War", p385)



Another element in the Nixon-Kissinger strategy for Vietnam, the madman theory, was long neglected in Nixonian historiography. The first public mention of this stratagem of coercion was in White House chief-of-staff H. R. Haldeman’s memoir, The Ends of Power (Haldeman 1978: 82–3). With a few exceptions (Hersh 1983; Isaacson 1992), however, works published before 1998 often ignored, doubted, or rejected Haldeman’s testimony (Greenstein 1983; Hoff 1994; Immerman 1991). Some historians and journalists suggested that Haldeman’s assisting author, Joseph DiMona, was responsible for inserting the story about the madman theory in the memoir and that Haldeman later retracted his association with it. But Haldeman affirmed Nixon’s embrace of the madman theory in a 1990 interview with Walter Isaacson (1992; see also Summers 2000). Haldeman’s comments, the memoirs of other Nixon aides, Nixon’s own semi-private statements, and declassified documents and tapes serve to confirm Nixon’s faith in and implementation of the madman theory and of Kissinger’s collaboration in the project (Kimball 1998, 2004).
(Schulzinger, p 386)



Melvin Small: "A Companion to Richard M. Nixon", Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, 2011.




This is of course only focussing on Nixon's strategy as that of a madman.
Previous examples of the term not only foreshadow the Vietnam/Cold War use:



Brownson's review, 1845:




We are not disposed to undertake the refutation of this theory, which may be termed the demoniacal, or madman's theory, for none but a madman will attempt to reason a mad man out of his crotchets.




The New York Times Magazine, 1968 (tiny snippet view talking about Asian/American politics; alternative view)



Saturday Review 1963:




A fourth type of accidental war is what has sometimes been called the "madman" theory.




The re-adaptation of this political behaviour as deliberate tactic seems to be even earlier attested:




enter image description here

Paul Alan Lawrence Smith: "Politics and Social Life: An Introduction to Political Behavior", Houghton Mifflin, 1963.




Even more curious might be that after all, this type of game-theory application is only fully appreciated if you read it 'in the Russian original':




In the late fifties, Schelling, Morgenstern, Kissinger, and Ellsberg (as well as others) were part of a circle of strategic thinkers centered at Harvard and RAND who were concerned mainly with the problem of the instability of the nuclear arms race and nuclear deterrence.5 They recognized, analyzed, understood, and criticized the irrationality theory. Although they believed in the efficacy of force in foreign policy, in the late fifties none of these civilian strategists, as far as I can discern, actually advocated a madman strategy of ambiguity, irrationality, uncertainty, unpredictability, or excessive force and ruthlessness as later practiced by Nixon. (Kissinger converted to the madman theory while working for Nixon; Schelling had a falling out with Kissinger over his and Nixon’s conduct of the Vietnam War.)[…]



Even if I am wrong and these “wizards of Armageddon” had indeed advocated madman strategies, and even though they may have been the first game theorists and civilian deterrent strategists to discuss the madman theory, they had not invented or originated it, as some writers have claimed or implied.



I have argued elsewhere that the madman theory is as old as “civilization,” if not humanity itself, and that the madman theory’s inventors and practitioners were political-military decision makers:




The principle of instilling fear by threatening excessive force is as ancient as statecraft, war, and terror. Demanding the return of a hostage, the second millennium bce Hittite King Mursli, for example, issued this warning . . . to the hostage-taker: “I will come and destroy you along with your land.” Over three thousand years later, the principle became an essential component of [strategic bombing and] “atomic diplomacy.” While serving as vice president at the dawn of the nuclear age—the period in which Nixon had come of age as a policymaker and strategist—he learned about the “uncertainty principle,” which was one of the principles that lay at the heart of the atomic “brinkmanship” or “massive retaliation” strategy of President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Secretary of State John Foster Dulles.7




Nixon had also learned from Nikita Khrushchev, who, Nixon claimed, was “the most brilliant world leader I have ever met,” because he nurtured a reputation for rashness and unpredictability that “scared the hell out of people.” 8



Jeffrey Kimball: "Did Thomas C. Schelling Invent the Madman Theory?", History News Network, George Washington University, (2019?)




The above gives a gist of what might be called a zeitgeist.



Who invented the strategy, who named it first, who publicised it so widely that now everyone knows its meaning?




When Nixon coined the name Madman Theory for his version of the principle of threatening and signaling the use of excessive force, he did not have to look far for the title. The words mad, madness, and madman in reference to nuclear policy and strategy were commonplace in the world of the 1950s and 1960s. Critics of a nuclear deterrent strategy based on massive retaliation or flexible response often used the word mad or similar language to describe the international arms regime. These included moviemakers, novelists, and scientists, as well as grassroots activists in the disarmament movement who opposed the nuclear arms race, nuclear testing, and massive retaliation for impoverishing economies, causing cancerous radioactive fallout, and risking global doom.17



Ironically and paradoxically, the practitioners of nuclear deterrence also invoked madness in reference to the system. Eisenhower referred to a US-USSR nuclear war as “insane” in correspondence with Winston Churchill in 1956.18 Admiral Arleigh Burke, chief of naval operations under President Eisenhower and an advocate of “minimal deterrence” based on submarine-launched ballistic missiles, said in 1957 that the United States had to be prepared “to counter any madmen who would resort” to all-out nuclear war.19 Robert McNamara, President Kennedy’s secretary of state, used the word in 1967 in describing the “mad momentum intrinsic to the development of all new nuclear weaponry.”20 On the other side of the Cold War divide, Soviet general secretary Khrushchev regularly claimed that “some madmen in the camp of the imperialists threaten the world with their atomic and hydrogen bombs.… Only a madman would want war.” Yet at other times, he could issue mad warnings of his own: “Should any madman launch an attack on our state or on other Socialist states we would be able literally to wipe the country or countries which attack us off the face of the earth.”21
Reinforcing the meme of madness during the 1960s was “assured destruction” (AD), a strategic doctrine that Secretary McNamara formulated in late 1963 to describe “an actual and credible second-strike capability” (a retaliatory ability to destroy at least 50 percent of the Soviets’ industrial capacity, 30 percent of their population, and 150 of their cities).22 As the term became public, many observers regarded assured destruction as yet another name for mutual deterrence.23 Skeptics, such as journalist Tom Wicker, voiced their objections to the “Strangelovish world of megatonnage and ‘assured destruction’” and the surrealistic, rationally irrational logic of “the terrible balance that renders both Soviet and American nuclear power useless for anything but mutual destruction.”24 By at least 1968, McNamara was publicly referring to assured destruction as “mutual assured destruction,”25 although it was apparently not until May 1971 that Donald G. Brennan, former president of the Hudson Institute and an advocate of missile defense, coined the satiric acronym MAD in New York Times op-eds.



Jeffrey P Kimball & William Burr: "Nixon's Nuclear Specter: The Secret Alert of 1969, Madman Diplomacy, and the Vietnam War", Modern War Studies, University Press of Kansas: Lawrence, 2015.




That would make the theory/strategy itself 'older than dirt', floating around in the 50s with increased attention from cold war strategists. Then Nixon seemed to have adopted that theory in this phrasing to describe his own intentions in the late 60s internally – while others still used this phrase interchangeably to describe real madmen's behaviours and outcomes. But only after Haldeman's memoirs were published the general public took over the current meaning of 'most probably make-believe madmanhood' in international, political relations.



That makes for quite a few cooks –– or 'fathers', 'coining' the term: Schelling, Morgenstern, Kissinger, Ellsberg, Nixon and Haldeman should be regarded as responsible for the current main meaning and understanding of "madman theory".






share|improve this answer















This seems to be coming from Haldeman:




While Nixon sought support from the silent majority, diplomats were at work on both North and South Viet- namese. Kissinger continued his talks with Le Duc Tho and indicated that his boss might be mentally unhinged. Nixon himself carefully cultivated the fears that he might go to irrational lengths to get his way. Chief of Staff Haldeman later dubbed this procedure the “madman strategy”: if the North Vietnamese doubted that Nixon felt bound by conventional restraints, they would sign before risking destruction. While Kissinger played upon these fears, Haig returned to Thieu in Saigon with some brutally frank messages. (p303)



Robert D. Schulzinger: "U.S. Diplomacy Since 1900", Oxford University Press: Oxford New York, 52002.




Or




Kimball delved into Nixon’s “madman strategy,” a term that came from chief of staff H.R. Haldeman’s recollection that Nixon thought he could intimidate North Vietnam by making them believe he would escalate the war relentlessly.
(Schulzinger "Nixon & Kissinger", p369)



The latter primarily consisted in the continuation of current ground operations, the escalation of air operations, and what Nixon secretly called “the madman theory” – his version of brinkmanship.
(Kimball "Vietnam War", p385)



Another element in the Nixon-Kissinger strategy for Vietnam, the madman theory, was long neglected in Nixonian historiography. The first public mention of this stratagem of coercion was in White House chief-of-staff H. R. Haldeman’s memoir, The Ends of Power (Haldeman 1978: 82–3). With a few exceptions (Hersh 1983; Isaacson 1992), however, works published before 1998 often ignored, doubted, or rejected Haldeman’s testimony (Greenstein 1983; Hoff 1994; Immerman 1991). Some historians and journalists suggested that Haldeman’s assisting author, Joseph DiMona, was responsible for inserting the story about the madman theory in the memoir and that Haldeman later retracted his association with it. But Haldeman affirmed Nixon’s embrace of the madman theory in a 1990 interview with Walter Isaacson (1992; see also Summers 2000). Haldeman’s comments, the memoirs of other Nixon aides, Nixon’s own semi-private statements, and declassified documents and tapes serve to confirm Nixon’s faith in and implementation of the madman theory and of Kissinger’s collaboration in the project (Kimball 1998, 2004).
(Schulzinger, p 386)



Melvin Small: "A Companion to Richard M. Nixon", Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, 2011.




This is of course only focussing on Nixon's strategy as that of a madman.
Previous examples of the term not only foreshadow the Vietnam/Cold War use:



Brownson's review, 1845:




We are not disposed to undertake the refutation of this theory, which may be termed the demoniacal, or madman's theory, for none but a madman will attempt to reason a mad man out of his crotchets.




The New York Times Magazine, 1968 (tiny snippet view talking about Asian/American politics; alternative view)



Saturday Review 1963:




A fourth type of accidental war is what has sometimes been called the "madman" theory.




The re-adaptation of this political behaviour as deliberate tactic seems to be even earlier attested:




enter image description here

Paul Alan Lawrence Smith: "Politics and Social Life: An Introduction to Political Behavior", Houghton Mifflin, 1963.




Even more curious might be that after all, this type of game-theory application is only fully appreciated if you read it 'in the Russian original':




In the late fifties, Schelling, Morgenstern, Kissinger, and Ellsberg (as well as others) were part of a circle of strategic thinkers centered at Harvard and RAND who were concerned mainly with the problem of the instability of the nuclear arms race and nuclear deterrence.5 They recognized, analyzed, understood, and criticized the irrationality theory. Although they believed in the efficacy of force in foreign policy, in the late fifties none of these civilian strategists, as far as I can discern, actually advocated a madman strategy of ambiguity, irrationality, uncertainty, unpredictability, or excessive force and ruthlessness as later practiced by Nixon. (Kissinger converted to the madman theory while working for Nixon; Schelling had a falling out with Kissinger over his and Nixon’s conduct of the Vietnam War.)[…]



Even if I am wrong and these “wizards of Armageddon” had indeed advocated madman strategies, and even though they may have been the first game theorists and civilian deterrent strategists to discuss the madman theory, they had not invented or originated it, as some writers have claimed or implied.



I have argued elsewhere that the madman theory is as old as “civilization,” if not humanity itself, and that the madman theory’s inventors and practitioners were political-military decision makers:




The principle of instilling fear by threatening excessive force is as ancient as statecraft, war, and terror. Demanding the return of a hostage, the second millennium bce Hittite King Mursli, for example, issued this warning . . . to the hostage-taker: “I will come and destroy you along with your land.” Over three thousand years later, the principle became an essential component of [strategic bombing and] “atomic diplomacy.” While serving as vice president at the dawn of the nuclear age—the period in which Nixon had come of age as a policymaker and strategist—he learned about the “uncertainty principle,” which was one of the principles that lay at the heart of the atomic “brinkmanship” or “massive retaliation” strategy of President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Secretary of State John Foster Dulles.7




Nixon had also learned from Nikita Khrushchev, who, Nixon claimed, was “the most brilliant world leader I have ever met,” because he nurtured a reputation for rashness and unpredictability that “scared the hell out of people.” 8



Jeffrey Kimball: "Did Thomas C. Schelling Invent the Madman Theory?", History News Network, George Washington University, (2019?)




The above gives a gist of what might be called a zeitgeist.



Who invented the strategy, who named it first, who publicised it so widely that now everyone knows its meaning?




When Nixon coined the name Madman Theory for his version of the principle of threatening and signaling the use of excessive force, he did not have to look far for the title. The words mad, madness, and madman in reference to nuclear policy and strategy were commonplace in the world of the 1950s and 1960s. Critics of a nuclear deterrent strategy based on massive retaliation or flexible response often used the word mad or similar language to describe the international arms regime. These included moviemakers, novelists, and scientists, as well as grassroots activists in the disarmament movement who opposed the nuclear arms race, nuclear testing, and massive retaliation for impoverishing economies, causing cancerous radioactive fallout, and risking global doom.17



Ironically and paradoxically, the practitioners of nuclear deterrence also invoked madness in reference to the system. Eisenhower referred to a US-USSR nuclear war as “insane” in correspondence with Winston Churchill in 1956.18 Admiral Arleigh Burke, chief of naval operations under President Eisenhower and an advocate of “minimal deterrence” based on submarine-launched ballistic missiles, said in 1957 that the United States had to be prepared “to counter any madmen who would resort” to all-out nuclear war.19 Robert McNamara, President Kennedy’s secretary of state, used the word in 1967 in describing the “mad momentum intrinsic to the development of all new nuclear weaponry.”20 On the other side of the Cold War divide, Soviet general secretary Khrushchev regularly claimed that “some madmen in the camp of the imperialists threaten the world with their atomic and hydrogen bombs.… Only a madman would want war.” Yet at other times, he could issue mad warnings of his own: “Should any madman launch an attack on our state or on other Socialist states we would be able literally to wipe the country or countries which attack us off the face of the earth.”21
Reinforcing the meme of madness during the 1960s was “assured destruction” (AD), a strategic doctrine that Secretary McNamara formulated in late 1963 to describe “an actual and credible second-strike capability” (a retaliatory ability to destroy at least 50 percent of the Soviets’ industrial capacity, 30 percent of their population, and 150 of their cities).22 As the term became public, many observers regarded assured destruction as yet another name for mutual deterrence.23 Skeptics, such as journalist Tom Wicker, voiced their objections to the “Strangelovish world of megatonnage and ‘assured destruction’” and the surrealistic, rationally irrational logic of “the terrible balance that renders both Soviet and American nuclear power useless for anything but mutual destruction.”24 By at least 1968, McNamara was publicly referring to assured destruction as “mutual assured destruction,”25 although it was apparently not until May 1971 that Donald G. Brennan, former president of the Hudson Institute and an advocate of missile defense, coined the satiric acronym MAD in New York Times op-eds.



Jeffrey P Kimball & William Burr: "Nixon's Nuclear Specter: The Secret Alert of 1969, Madman Diplomacy, and the Vietnam War", Modern War Studies, University Press of Kansas: Lawrence, 2015.




That would make the theory/strategy itself 'older than dirt', floating around in the 50s with increased attention from cold war strategists. Then Nixon seemed to have adopted that theory in this phrasing to describe his own intentions in the late 60s internally – while others still used this phrase interchangeably to describe real madmen's behaviours and outcomes. But only after Haldeman's memoirs were published the general public took over the current meaning of 'most probably make-believe madmanhood' in international, political relations.



That makes for quite a few cooks –– or 'fathers', 'coining' the term: Schelling, Morgenstern, Kissinger, Ellsberg, Nixon and Haldeman should be regarded as responsible for the current main meaning and understanding of "madman theory".







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 14 hours ago

























answered 16 hours ago









LangLangCLangLangC

1,7521421




1,7521421













  • Well, wikipedia says Haldeman said Nixon told him "I call it the Madman Theory, Bob. "

    – Fizz
    16 hours ago











  • It does sound plausible that Haldeman fist used "madman strategy" with this meaning. There are only two Google Books hits before 1980 on that phrase, all with a different meaning. See links from ngram

    – Fizz
    15 hours ago













  • I think that NYT piece that was with a somewhat different meaning; the "madman theory" was defined as "We must prepare against the enemy's capabilities, not his intentions". in that piece.

    – Fizz
    15 hours ago








  • 3





    Coincidentally, 'madman' is used to describe a corresponding strategy in poker which is a game Nixon was quite skilled at. I don't know when it started being used so it may be nothing more than that, a coincidence.

    – JimmyJames
    12 hours ago











  • The closely related idiom, "crazy like a fox" dates back to at least 1896. english.stackexchange.com/questions/241994/…

    – ohwilleke
    4 hours ago





















  • Well, wikipedia says Haldeman said Nixon told him "I call it the Madman Theory, Bob. "

    – Fizz
    16 hours ago











  • It does sound plausible that Haldeman fist used "madman strategy" with this meaning. There are only two Google Books hits before 1980 on that phrase, all with a different meaning. See links from ngram

    – Fizz
    15 hours ago













  • I think that NYT piece that was with a somewhat different meaning; the "madman theory" was defined as "We must prepare against the enemy's capabilities, not his intentions". in that piece.

    – Fizz
    15 hours ago








  • 3





    Coincidentally, 'madman' is used to describe a corresponding strategy in poker which is a game Nixon was quite skilled at. I don't know when it started being used so it may be nothing more than that, a coincidence.

    – JimmyJames
    12 hours ago











  • The closely related idiom, "crazy like a fox" dates back to at least 1896. english.stackexchange.com/questions/241994/…

    – ohwilleke
    4 hours ago



















Well, wikipedia says Haldeman said Nixon told him "I call it the Madman Theory, Bob. "

– Fizz
16 hours ago





Well, wikipedia says Haldeman said Nixon told him "I call it the Madman Theory, Bob. "

– Fizz
16 hours ago













It does sound plausible that Haldeman fist used "madman strategy" with this meaning. There are only two Google Books hits before 1980 on that phrase, all with a different meaning. See links from ngram

– Fizz
15 hours ago







It does sound plausible that Haldeman fist used "madman strategy" with this meaning. There are only two Google Books hits before 1980 on that phrase, all with a different meaning. See links from ngram

– Fizz
15 hours ago















I think that NYT piece that was with a somewhat different meaning; the "madman theory" was defined as "We must prepare against the enemy's capabilities, not his intentions". in that piece.

– Fizz
15 hours ago







I think that NYT piece that was with a somewhat different meaning; the "madman theory" was defined as "We must prepare against the enemy's capabilities, not his intentions". in that piece.

– Fizz
15 hours ago






3




3





Coincidentally, 'madman' is used to describe a corresponding strategy in poker which is a game Nixon was quite skilled at. I don't know when it started being used so it may be nothing more than that, a coincidence.

– JimmyJames
12 hours ago





Coincidentally, 'madman' is used to describe a corresponding strategy in poker which is a game Nixon was quite skilled at. I don't know when it started being used so it may be nothing more than that, a coincidence.

– JimmyJames
12 hours ago













The closely related idiom, "crazy like a fox" dates back to at least 1896. english.stackexchange.com/questions/241994/…

– ohwilleke
4 hours ago







The closely related idiom, "crazy like a fox" dates back to at least 1896. english.stackexchange.com/questions/241994/…

– ohwilleke
4 hours ago













4














There's a bit more interesting theorizing in Hersh's book The Price of Power how the theory may have come to the attention of Nixon.




It is highly likely that Kissinger was responsible for Nixon's adoption of the phrase the "the madman theory". In 1959, Ellsberg had present two lectures to Kissinger's Harvard seminar on the conscious political use of irrational military threats. Ellsberg called the theory "The Political Uses of Madness". In essence he described a problem in bargaining theory: what to do when the available threat is so extreme or costly as to make it seem unlikely that a sane and reasonable person would carry it out. On the other hand, since the threat is so extreme, Ellsberg noted, it does not have to be very likely to be used in order to be effective, particularly if the nation posing the threat is making only moderate negotiating demands. Ellsberg postulated that one way of making the threat somehow credible--which, in this case, was all that would be necessary--would be for the person making the threat to appear not to be fully rational. In effect, and application this was implicit in Kissinger's Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy, which advocated among other things, a "strategy of ambiguity" in connection with United States use of of tactical nuclear weapons. In his Harvard lecture, Ellsberg cites as his example Hitler's conscious use of his reputation as a madman to win victoires without firing a shot in the Rhineland, Austria and Munich before World War II. As his model of Hitler indicated, Ellsberg regarded such a strategy as reckless and utterly dangerous for the world, but a possibility to be anticipated from opponents because, in connection with a nuclear threat, it might work.




Wikipedia says however that




In Nixon's Vietnam War, Kimball argues that Nixon arrived at the strategy independently, as a result of practical experience and observation of Dwight D. Eisenhower's handling of the Korean War.




YMMV. There's more than one plausible route how Nixon came up with the term and/or the idea.



P.S.: One more interesting thing: Lang Lang's answer (quoting Kimball) says Nixon also learned from Khrushchev. But, interestingly, Khrushchev is also briefly discussed as an example in the final page of Ellsberg's 1959 lecture:




For if Hitler was mad, his theory was not. "The difference between Munich and now," Khrushchev said recently (March, 1959) "is that I am not Adolph Hitler." (He didn't feel a need to distinguish himself from Chamberlain.)







share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    What do you mean by "YMMV", "Your mileage may vary"? How is that statement applicable here?

    – Captain Man
    8 hours ago











  • @CaptainMan: because we can't really know how Nixon came up with it (both as a term and as a notion.) The accounts differ between sources. One interesting thing is Lang Lang's answer (quoting Kimball) says Nixon (or Kissinger) learned from Kruschev. But, interestingly, Kruschev is also briefly discussed as an example in the final page of Ellsberg's 1959 lecture.

    – Fizz
    1 hour ago


















4














There's a bit more interesting theorizing in Hersh's book The Price of Power how the theory may have come to the attention of Nixon.




It is highly likely that Kissinger was responsible for Nixon's adoption of the phrase the "the madman theory". In 1959, Ellsberg had present two lectures to Kissinger's Harvard seminar on the conscious political use of irrational military threats. Ellsberg called the theory "The Political Uses of Madness". In essence he described a problem in bargaining theory: what to do when the available threat is so extreme or costly as to make it seem unlikely that a sane and reasonable person would carry it out. On the other hand, since the threat is so extreme, Ellsberg noted, it does not have to be very likely to be used in order to be effective, particularly if the nation posing the threat is making only moderate negotiating demands. Ellsberg postulated that one way of making the threat somehow credible--which, in this case, was all that would be necessary--would be for the person making the threat to appear not to be fully rational. In effect, and application this was implicit in Kissinger's Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy, which advocated among other things, a "strategy of ambiguity" in connection with United States use of of tactical nuclear weapons. In his Harvard lecture, Ellsberg cites as his example Hitler's conscious use of his reputation as a madman to win victoires without firing a shot in the Rhineland, Austria and Munich before World War II. As his model of Hitler indicated, Ellsberg regarded such a strategy as reckless and utterly dangerous for the world, but a possibility to be anticipated from opponents because, in connection with a nuclear threat, it might work.




Wikipedia says however that




In Nixon's Vietnam War, Kimball argues that Nixon arrived at the strategy independently, as a result of practical experience and observation of Dwight D. Eisenhower's handling of the Korean War.




YMMV. There's more than one plausible route how Nixon came up with the term and/or the idea.



P.S.: One more interesting thing: Lang Lang's answer (quoting Kimball) says Nixon also learned from Khrushchev. But, interestingly, Khrushchev is also briefly discussed as an example in the final page of Ellsberg's 1959 lecture:




For if Hitler was mad, his theory was not. "The difference between Munich and now," Khrushchev said recently (March, 1959) "is that I am not Adolph Hitler." (He didn't feel a need to distinguish himself from Chamberlain.)







share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    What do you mean by "YMMV", "Your mileage may vary"? How is that statement applicable here?

    – Captain Man
    8 hours ago











  • @CaptainMan: because we can't really know how Nixon came up with it (both as a term and as a notion.) The accounts differ between sources. One interesting thing is Lang Lang's answer (quoting Kimball) says Nixon (or Kissinger) learned from Kruschev. But, interestingly, Kruschev is also briefly discussed as an example in the final page of Ellsberg's 1959 lecture.

    – Fizz
    1 hour ago
















4












4








4







There's a bit more interesting theorizing in Hersh's book The Price of Power how the theory may have come to the attention of Nixon.




It is highly likely that Kissinger was responsible for Nixon's adoption of the phrase the "the madman theory". In 1959, Ellsberg had present two lectures to Kissinger's Harvard seminar on the conscious political use of irrational military threats. Ellsberg called the theory "The Political Uses of Madness". In essence he described a problem in bargaining theory: what to do when the available threat is so extreme or costly as to make it seem unlikely that a sane and reasonable person would carry it out. On the other hand, since the threat is so extreme, Ellsberg noted, it does not have to be very likely to be used in order to be effective, particularly if the nation posing the threat is making only moderate negotiating demands. Ellsberg postulated that one way of making the threat somehow credible--which, in this case, was all that would be necessary--would be for the person making the threat to appear not to be fully rational. In effect, and application this was implicit in Kissinger's Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy, which advocated among other things, a "strategy of ambiguity" in connection with United States use of of tactical nuclear weapons. In his Harvard lecture, Ellsberg cites as his example Hitler's conscious use of his reputation as a madman to win victoires without firing a shot in the Rhineland, Austria and Munich before World War II. As his model of Hitler indicated, Ellsberg regarded such a strategy as reckless and utterly dangerous for the world, but a possibility to be anticipated from opponents because, in connection with a nuclear threat, it might work.




Wikipedia says however that




In Nixon's Vietnam War, Kimball argues that Nixon arrived at the strategy independently, as a result of practical experience and observation of Dwight D. Eisenhower's handling of the Korean War.




YMMV. There's more than one plausible route how Nixon came up with the term and/or the idea.



P.S.: One more interesting thing: Lang Lang's answer (quoting Kimball) says Nixon also learned from Khrushchev. But, interestingly, Khrushchev is also briefly discussed as an example in the final page of Ellsberg's 1959 lecture:




For if Hitler was mad, his theory was not. "The difference between Munich and now," Khrushchev said recently (March, 1959) "is that I am not Adolph Hitler." (He didn't feel a need to distinguish himself from Chamberlain.)







share|improve this answer















There's a bit more interesting theorizing in Hersh's book The Price of Power how the theory may have come to the attention of Nixon.




It is highly likely that Kissinger was responsible for Nixon's adoption of the phrase the "the madman theory". In 1959, Ellsberg had present two lectures to Kissinger's Harvard seminar on the conscious political use of irrational military threats. Ellsberg called the theory "The Political Uses of Madness". In essence he described a problem in bargaining theory: what to do when the available threat is so extreme or costly as to make it seem unlikely that a sane and reasonable person would carry it out. On the other hand, since the threat is so extreme, Ellsberg noted, it does not have to be very likely to be used in order to be effective, particularly if the nation posing the threat is making only moderate negotiating demands. Ellsberg postulated that one way of making the threat somehow credible--which, in this case, was all that would be necessary--would be for the person making the threat to appear not to be fully rational. In effect, and application this was implicit in Kissinger's Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy, which advocated among other things, a "strategy of ambiguity" in connection with United States use of of tactical nuclear weapons. In his Harvard lecture, Ellsberg cites as his example Hitler's conscious use of his reputation as a madman to win victoires without firing a shot in the Rhineland, Austria and Munich before World War II. As his model of Hitler indicated, Ellsberg regarded such a strategy as reckless and utterly dangerous for the world, but a possibility to be anticipated from opponents because, in connection with a nuclear threat, it might work.




Wikipedia says however that




In Nixon's Vietnam War, Kimball argues that Nixon arrived at the strategy independently, as a result of practical experience and observation of Dwight D. Eisenhower's handling of the Korean War.




YMMV. There's more than one plausible route how Nixon came up with the term and/or the idea.



P.S.: One more interesting thing: Lang Lang's answer (quoting Kimball) says Nixon also learned from Khrushchev. But, interestingly, Khrushchev is also briefly discussed as an example in the final page of Ellsberg's 1959 lecture:




For if Hitler was mad, his theory was not. "The difference between Munich and now," Khrushchev said recently (March, 1959) "is that I am not Adolph Hitler." (He didn't feel a need to distinguish himself from Chamberlain.)








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 15 hours ago









FizzFizz

14.6k23795




14.6k23795








  • 1





    What do you mean by "YMMV", "Your mileage may vary"? How is that statement applicable here?

    – Captain Man
    8 hours ago











  • @CaptainMan: because we can't really know how Nixon came up with it (both as a term and as a notion.) The accounts differ between sources. One interesting thing is Lang Lang's answer (quoting Kimball) says Nixon (or Kissinger) learned from Kruschev. But, interestingly, Kruschev is also briefly discussed as an example in the final page of Ellsberg's 1959 lecture.

    – Fizz
    1 hour ago
















  • 1





    What do you mean by "YMMV", "Your mileage may vary"? How is that statement applicable here?

    – Captain Man
    8 hours ago











  • @CaptainMan: because we can't really know how Nixon came up with it (both as a term and as a notion.) The accounts differ between sources. One interesting thing is Lang Lang's answer (quoting Kimball) says Nixon (or Kissinger) learned from Kruschev. But, interestingly, Kruschev is also briefly discussed as an example in the final page of Ellsberg's 1959 lecture.

    – Fizz
    1 hour ago










1




1





What do you mean by "YMMV", "Your mileage may vary"? How is that statement applicable here?

– Captain Man
8 hours ago





What do you mean by "YMMV", "Your mileage may vary"? How is that statement applicable here?

– Captain Man
8 hours ago













@CaptainMan: because we can't really know how Nixon came up with it (both as a term and as a notion.) The accounts differ between sources. One interesting thing is Lang Lang's answer (quoting Kimball) says Nixon (or Kissinger) learned from Kruschev. But, interestingly, Kruschev is also briefly discussed as an example in the final page of Ellsberg's 1959 lecture.

– Fizz
1 hour ago







@CaptainMan: because we can't really know how Nixon came up with it (both as a term and as a notion.) The accounts differ between sources. One interesting thing is Lang Lang's answer (quoting Kimball) says Nixon (or Kissinger) learned from Kruschev. But, interestingly, Kruschev is also briefly discussed as an example in the final page of Ellsberg's 1959 lecture.

– Fizz
1 hour ago




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40447%2fwho-coined-the-term-madman-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029