If a Druid sees an animal’s corpse, can they Wild Shape into that animal?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
The Druid’s Wild Shape feature says:
you can use your action to magically assume the shape of a beast that you have seen before.
However, if a Druid sees the creature’s corpse, can they turn into a living version of the creature?
dnd-5e class-feature druid wild-shape
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Druid’s Wild Shape feature says:
you can use your action to magically assume the shape of a beast that you have seen before.
However, if a Druid sees the creature’s corpse, can they turn into a living version of the creature?
dnd-5e class-feature druid wild-shape
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Related: Is a dead creature's body considered an “object”?
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Druid’s Wild Shape feature says:
you can use your action to magically assume the shape of a beast that you have seen before.
However, if a Druid sees the creature’s corpse, can they turn into a living version of the creature?
dnd-5e class-feature druid wild-shape
$endgroup$
The Druid’s Wild Shape feature says:
you can use your action to magically assume the shape of a beast that you have seen before.
However, if a Druid sees the creature’s corpse, can they turn into a living version of the creature?
dnd-5e class-feature druid wild-shape
dnd-5e class-feature druid wild-shape
edited 2 hours ago
V2Blast
26.3k591161
26.3k591161
asked 13 hours ago
MrHiTechMrHiTech
871323
871323
3
$begingroup$
Related: Is a dead creature's body considered an “object”?
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
12 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Related: Is a dead creature's body considered an “object”?
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
12 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Related: Is a dead creature's body considered an “object”?
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Related: Is a dead creature's body considered an “object”?
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
12 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
On a literal reading, no
Corpses are objects. Jeremy Crawford has unofficially advised as much on Twitter:
A non-undead corpse isn't considered a creature. It's effectively an object.
And see Is a dead creature's body considered an "object"? which addresses this.
A beast is a type of creature. So, having seen an animal's corpse, you haven't seen a beast.
From an in-universe point of view, you could perhaps justify this by saying the Druid needs to see how the beast moves before turning into it.
Many DMs might rule you could
My above answer is a painfully literal reading of the rules, and I personally would allow a Druid who'd seen an animal's corpse to turn into it.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
A little support for the "no" RAW answer: sageadvice.eu/2015/05/14/corpse-creature-or-object
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
12 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
I'd like to point out how much I smiled at the admission of how painfully literal the RAW reading is. Enjoy many a +1, good sir.
$endgroup$
– 3C273
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let's try to remember that both Sage Advice and Twitter are not official rulings. They are opinions, perhaps very well informed opinions, but opinions all the same. It's not equal to the official rules saying one thing or another.
$endgroup$
– Aeyt
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am not aware of any written rules to support this answer, so we'll have to go with what makes sense.
You can Wild Shape into the shape of dead animals.
It seems overly pedantic to assume that the beast is no longer similar enough to itself when it was alive that you don't gain what you need to be able to morph into it. Especially since you only need to see it in order to use the ability (rather than needing to touch a living, breathing thing).
And just to throw in the "plain English interpretation", the corpse is still the "shape of a beast" that you have seen before; you saw the "shape of a beast"(assuming that it hasn't been butchered or something similarly disfiguring).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I assume you mean Wild Shape rather than Shapechange?
$endgroup$
– Vigil
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Vigil fixed, thanks!
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
12 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144972%2fif-a-druid-sees-an-animal-s-corpse-can-they-wild-shape-into-that-animal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
On a literal reading, no
Corpses are objects. Jeremy Crawford has unofficially advised as much on Twitter:
A non-undead corpse isn't considered a creature. It's effectively an object.
And see Is a dead creature's body considered an "object"? which addresses this.
A beast is a type of creature. So, having seen an animal's corpse, you haven't seen a beast.
From an in-universe point of view, you could perhaps justify this by saying the Druid needs to see how the beast moves before turning into it.
Many DMs might rule you could
My above answer is a painfully literal reading of the rules, and I personally would allow a Druid who'd seen an animal's corpse to turn into it.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
A little support for the "no" RAW answer: sageadvice.eu/2015/05/14/corpse-creature-or-object
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
12 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
I'd like to point out how much I smiled at the admission of how painfully literal the RAW reading is. Enjoy many a +1, good sir.
$endgroup$
– 3C273
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let's try to remember that both Sage Advice and Twitter are not official rulings. They are opinions, perhaps very well informed opinions, but opinions all the same. It's not equal to the official rules saying one thing or another.
$endgroup$
– Aeyt
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On a literal reading, no
Corpses are objects. Jeremy Crawford has unofficially advised as much on Twitter:
A non-undead corpse isn't considered a creature. It's effectively an object.
And see Is a dead creature's body considered an "object"? which addresses this.
A beast is a type of creature. So, having seen an animal's corpse, you haven't seen a beast.
From an in-universe point of view, you could perhaps justify this by saying the Druid needs to see how the beast moves before turning into it.
Many DMs might rule you could
My above answer is a painfully literal reading of the rules, and I personally would allow a Druid who'd seen an animal's corpse to turn into it.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
A little support for the "no" RAW answer: sageadvice.eu/2015/05/14/corpse-creature-or-object
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
12 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
I'd like to point out how much I smiled at the admission of how painfully literal the RAW reading is. Enjoy many a +1, good sir.
$endgroup$
– 3C273
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let's try to remember that both Sage Advice and Twitter are not official rulings. They are opinions, perhaps very well informed opinions, but opinions all the same. It's not equal to the official rules saying one thing or another.
$endgroup$
– Aeyt
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On a literal reading, no
Corpses are objects. Jeremy Crawford has unofficially advised as much on Twitter:
A non-undead corpse isn't considered a creature. It's effectively an object.
And see Is a dead creature's body considered an "object"? which addresses this.
A beast is a type of creature. So, having seen an animal's corpse, you haven't seen a beast.
From an in-universe point of view, you could perhaps justify this by saying the Druid needs to see how the beast moves before turning into it.
Many DMs might rule you could
My above answer is a painfully literal reading of the rules, and I personally would allow a Druid who'd seen an animal's corpse to turn into it.
$endgroup$
On a literal reading, no
Corpses are objects. Jeremy Crawford has unofficially advised as much on Twitter:
A non-undead corpse isn't considered a creature. It's effectively an object.
And see Is a dead creature's body considered an "object"? which addresses this.
A beast is a type of creature. So, having seen an animal's corpse, you haven't seen a beast.
From an in-universe point of view, you could perhaps justify this by saying the Druid needs to see how the beast moves before turning into it.
Many DMs might rule you could
My above answer is a painfully literal reading of the rules, and I personally would allow a Druid who'd seen an animal's corpse to turn into it.
edited 2 hours ago
V2Blast
26.3k591161
26.3k591161
answered 12 hours ago
VigilVigil
6,6303184
6,6303184
3
$begingroup$
A little support for the "no" RAW answer: sageadvice.eu/2015/05/14/corpse-creature-or-object
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
12 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
I'd like to point out how much I smiled at the admission of how painfully literal the RAW reading is. Enjoy many a +1, good sir.
$endgroup$
– 3C273
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let's try to remember that both Sage Advice and Twitter are not official rulings. They are opinions, perhaps very well informed opinions, but opinions all the same. It's not equal to the official rules saying one thing or another.
$endgroup$
– Aeyt
3 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
A little support for the "no" RAW answer: sageadvice.eu/2015/05/14/corpse-creature-or-object
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
12 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
I'd like to point out how much I smiled at the admission of how painfully literal the RAW reading is. Enjoy many a +1, good sir.
$endgroup$
– 3C273
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let's try to remember that both Sage Advice and Twitter are not official rulings. They are opinions, perhaps very well informed opinions, but opinions all the same. It's not equal to the official rules saying one thing or another.
$endgroup$
– Aeyt
3 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
A little support for the "no" RAW answer: sageadvice.eu/2015/05/14/corpse-creature-or-object
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
A little support for the "no" RAW answer: sageadvice.eu/2015/05/14/corpse-creature-or-object
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
12 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
I'd like to point out how much I smiled at the admission of how painfully literal the RAW reading is. Enjoy many a +1, good sir.
$endgroup$
– 3C273
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'd like to point out how much I smiled at the admission of how painfully literal the RAW reading is. Enjoy many a +1, good sir.
$endgroup$
– 3C273
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let's try to remember that both Sage Advice and Twitter are not official rulings. They are opinions, perhaps very well informed opinions, but opinions all the same. It's not equal to the official rules saying one thing or another.
$endgroup$
– Aeyt
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Let's try to remember that both Sage Advice and Twitter are not official rulings. They are opinions, perhaps very well informed opinions, but opinions all the same. It's not equal to the official rules saying one thing or another.
$endgroup$
– Aeyt
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am not aware of any written rules to support this answer, so we'll have to go with what makes sense.
You can Wild Shape into the shape of dead animals.
It seems overly pedantic to assume that the beast is no longer similar enough to itself when it was alive that you don't gain what you need to be able to morph into it. Especially since you only need to see it in order to use the ability (rather than needing to touch a living, breathing thing).
And just to throw in the "plain English interpretation", the corpse is still the "shape of a beast" that you have seen before; you saw the "shape of a beast"(assuming that it hasn't been butchered or something similarly disfiguring).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I assume you mean Wild Shape rather than Shapechange?
$endgroup$
– Vigil
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Vigil fixed, thanks!
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am not aware of any written rules to support this answer, so we'll have to go with what makes sense.
You can Wild Shape into the shape of dead animals.
It seems overly pedantic to assume that the beast is no longer similar enough to itself when it was alive that you don't gain what you need to be able to morph into it. Especially since you only need to see it in order to use the ability (rather than needing to touch a living, breathing thing).
And just to throw in the "plain English interpretation", the corpse is still the "shape of a beast" that you have seen before; you saw the "shape of a beast"(assuming that it hasn't been butchered or something similarly disfiguring).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I assume you mean Wild Shape rather than Shapechange?
$endgroup$
– Vigil
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Vigil fixed, thanks!
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am not aware of any written rules to support this answer, so we'll have to go with what makes sense.
You can Wild Shape into the shape of dead animals.
It seems overly pedantic to assume that the beast is no longer similar enough to itself when it was alive that you don't gain what you need to be able to morph into it. Especially since you only need to see it in order to use the ability (rather than needing to touch a living, breathing thing).
And just to throw in the "plain English interpretation", the corpse is still the "shape of a beast" that you have seen before; you saw the "shape of a beast"(assuming that it hasn't been butchered or something similarly disfiguring).
$endgroup$
I am not aware of any written rules to support this answer, so we'll have to go with what makes sense.
You can Wild Shape into the shape of dead animals.
It seems overly pedantic to assume that the beast is no longer similar enough to itself when it was alive that you don't gain what you need to be able to morph into it. Especially since you only need to see it in order to use the ability (rather than needing to touch a living, breathing thing).
And just to throw in the "plain English interpretation", the corpse is still the "shape of a beast" that you have seen before; you saw the "shape of a beast"(assuming that it hasn't been butchered or something similarly disfiguring).
edited 2 hours ago
V2Blast
26.3k591161
26.3k591161
answered 12 hours ago
goodguy5goodguy5
9,93623678
9,93623678
$begingroup$
I assume you mean Wild Shape rather than Shapechange?
$endgroup$
– Vigil
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Vigil fixed, thanks!
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I assume you mean Wild Shape rather than Shapechange?
$endgroup$
– Vigil
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Vigil fixed, thanks!
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I assume you mean Wild Shape rather than Shapechange?
$endgroup$
– Vigil
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I assume you mean Wild Shape rather than Shapechange?
$endgroup$
– Vigil
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Vigil fixed, thanks!
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Vigil fixed, thanks!
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
12 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144972%2fif-a-druid-sees-an-animal-s-corpse-can-they-wild-shape-into-that-animal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Related: Is a dead creature's body considered an “object”?
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
12 hours ago