The meaning of `There's no way ever you'd use a computer to show it's true.`





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







2















Does the sentence:




There's no way ever you'd use a computer to show it's true.




mean:





  1. There's some way that I can show it's true by computer

  2. There's no way that I can show it's true even by computer** ?




(I am an English learner and I am confused about this sentence.)






meaning sentence







share|improve this question

























  • The second, almost, but the original sentence has "would" not "can". So it doesn't mean you cannot, but would not use a computer for this. For example, you might use a computer to prove that more people worship than don't, but you would never use a computer to prove that what they worship is real.

    – Weather Vane
    Mar 11 at 8:30








  • 1





    Your second sentence is closest, but the even puts the wrong emphasis on it. The sentence says nothing about using other things. It's only talking about computers. By saying even you are making the false assumption that if anything could show it's true, a computer would be the best thing to do that. (And as the other comment says, it's would, not can.)

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 11 at 8:50






  • 3





    Neither. You wouldn't use a computer to prove it is true. A computer is not a tool you would use to demonstrate it is true - you would use a [bucket and spade] to show that it is true.

    – Smock
    Mar 11 at 12:02


















2















Does the sentence:




There's no way ever you'd use a computer to show it's true.




mean:





  1. There's some way that I can show it's true by computer

  2. There's no way that I can show it's true even by computer** ?




(I am an English learner and I am confused about this sentence.)






meaning sentence







share|improve this question

























  • The second, almost, but the original sentence has "would" not "can". So it doesn't mean you cannot, but would not use a computer for this. For example, you might use a computer to prove that more people worship than don't, but you would never use a computer to prove that what they worship is real.

    – Weather Vane
    Mar 11 at 8:30








  • 1





    Your second sentence is closest, but the even puts the wrong emphasis on it. The sentence says nothing about using other things. It's only talking about computers. By saying even you are making the false assumption that if anything could show it's true, a computer would be the best thing to do that. (And as the other comment says, it's would, not can.)

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 11 at 8:50






  • 3





    Neither. You wouldn't use a computer to prove it is true. A computer is not a tool you would use to demonstrate it is true - you would use a [bucket and spade] to show that it is true.

    – Smock
    Mar 11 at 12:02














2












2








2








Does the sentence:




There's no way ever you'd use a computer to show it's true.




mean:





  1. There's some way that I can show it's true by computer

  2. There's no way that I can show it's true even by computer** ?




(I am an English learner and I am confused about this sentence.)






meaning sentence







share|improve this question
















Does the sentence:




There's no way ever you'd use a computer to show it's true.




mean:





  1. There's some way that I can show it's true by computer

  2. There's no way that I can show it's true even by computer** ?




(I am an English learner and I am confused about this sentence.)






meaning sentence




meaning sentence






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago









TrevorD

10.7k22458




10.7k22458










asked Mar 11 at 8:24









王文军 or Wenjun Wang王文军 or Wenjun Wang

112




112













  • The second, almost, but the original sentence has "would" not "can". So it doesn't mean you cannot, but would not use a computer for this. For example, you might use a computer to prove that more people worship than don't, but you would never use a computer to prove that what they worship is real.

    – Weather Vane
    Mar 11 at 8:30








  • 1





    Your second sentence is closest, but the even puts the wrong emphasis on it. The sentence says nothing about using other things. It's only talking about computers. By saying even you are making the false assumption that if anything could show it's true, a computer would be the best thing to do that. (And as the other comment says, it's would, not can.)

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 11 at 8:50






  • 3





    Neither. You wouldn't use a computer to prove it is true. A computer is not a tool you would use to demonstrate it is true - you would use a [bucket and spade] to show that it is true.

    – Smock
    Mar 11 at 12:02



















  • The second, almost, but the original sentence has "would" not "can". So it doesn't mean you cannot, but would not use a computer for this. For example, you might use a computer to prove that more people worship than don't, but you would never use a computer to prove that what they worship is real.

    – Weather Vane
    Mar 11 at 8:30








  • 1





    Your second sentence is closest, but the even puts the wrong emphasis on it. The sentence says nothing about using other things. It's only talking about computers. By saying even you are making the false assumption that if anything could show it's true, a computer would be the best thing to do that. (And as the other comment says, it's would, not can.)

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 11 at 8:50






  • 3





    Neither. You wouldn't use a computer to prove it is true. A computer is not a tool you would use to demonstrate it is true - you would use a [bucket and spade] to show that it is true.

    – Smock
    Mar 11 at 12:02

















The second, almost, but the original sentence has "would" not "can". So it doesn't mean you cannot, but would not use a computer for this. For example, you might use a computer to prove that more people worship than don't, but you would never use a computer to prove that what they worship is real.

– Weather Vane
Mar 11 at 8:30







The second, almost, but the original sentence has "would" not "can". So it doesn't mean you cannot, but would not use a computer for this. For example, you might use a computer to prove that more people worship than don't, but you would never use a computer to prove that what they worship is real.

– Weather Vane
Mar 11 at 8:30






1




1





Your second sentence is closest, but the even puts the wrong emphasis on it. The sentence says nothing about using other things. It's only talking about computers. By saying even you are making the false assumption that if anything could show it's true, a computer would be the best thing to do that. (And as the other comment says, it's would, not can.)

– Jason Bassford
Mar 11 at 8:50





Your second sentence is closest, but the even puts the wrong emphasis on it. The sentence says nothing about using other things. It's only talking about computers. By saying even you are making the false assumption that if anything could show it's true, a computer would be the best thing to do that. (And as the other comment says, it's would, not can.)

– Jason Bassford
Mar 11 at 8:50




3




3





Neither. You wouldn't use a computer to prove it is true. A computer is not a tool you would use to demonstrate it is true - you would use a [bucket and spade] to show that it is true.

– Smock
Mar 11 at 12:02





Neither. You wouldn't use a computer to prove it is true. A computer is not a tool you would use to demonstrate it is true - you would use a [bucket and spade] to show that it is true.

– Smock
Mar 11 at 12:02










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














This sentence is not grammatically correct, so I assume that it was written or spoken by someone in conversation. I could see it meaning one of two things, depending on the context:




There's no way you'd ever use a computer to show it's true.

- Interchange ever and you'd.




This means that you would never show that it's true using a computer.




There's no way, ever! You'd use a computer to show it's true.

- Add an exclamation point to split it into two sentences.




The speaker refutes the listener's position, then offers a followup action.






share|improve this answer
























  • I've up-voted this since you have correctly pointed out that the sentence is not grammatical. And you have given a corrected version of what it almost certainly means. However I would have left out the second example, as the original was clearly not punctuated that way, and it probably adds further confusion for our Chinese OP to cope with.

    – WS2
    12 hours ago



















1














It means "One would never use a computer to show that it is true".



We don't have context but it seems the implication is that a computer is the wrong tool for the job.



There's no way ever = Not under any circumstances at any time (i.e. never)



That phrase could be punctuated like this:



There is no way, ever, (that) you i.e. "one" would use a computer to show it is true.






share|improve this answer


























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489139%2fthe-meaning-of-theres-no-way-ever-youd-use-a-computer-to-show-its-true%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    This sentence is not grammatically correct, so I assume that it was written or spoken by someone in conversation. I could see it meaning one of two things, depending on the context:




    There's no way you'd ever use a computer to show it's true.

    - Interchange ever and you'd.




    This means that you would never show that it's true using a computer.




    There's no way, ever! You'd use a computer to show it's true.

    - Add an exclamation point to split it into two sentences.




    The speaker refutes the listener's position, then offers a followup action.






    share|improve this answer
























    • I've up-voted this since you have correctly pointed out that the sentence is not grammatical. And you have given a corrected version of what it almost certainly means. However I would have left out the second example, as the original was clearly not punctuated that way, and it probably adds further confusion for our Chinese OP to cope with.

      – WS2
      12 hours ago
















    2














    This sentence is not grammatically correct, so I assume that it was written or spoken by someone in conversation. I could see it meaning one of two things, depending on the context:




    There's no way you'd ever use a computer to show it's true.

    - Interchange ever and you'd.




    This means that you would never show that it's true using a computer.




    There's no way, ever! You'd use a computer to show it's true.

    - Add an exclamation point to split it into two sentences.




    The speaker refutes the listener's position, then offers a followup action.






    share|improve this answer
























    • I've up-voted this since you have correctly pointed out that the sentence is not grammatical. And you have given a corrected version of what it almost certainly means. However I would have left out the second example, as the original was clearly not punctuated that way, and it probably adds further confusion for our Chinese OP to cope with.

      – WS2
      12 hours ago














    2












    2








    2







    This sentence is not grammatically correct, so I assume that it was written or spoken by someone in conversation. I could see it meaning one of two things, depending on the context:




    There's no way you'd ever use a computer to show it's true.

    - Interchange ever and you'd.




    This means that you would never show that it's true using a computer.




    There's no way, ever! You'd use a computer to show it's true.

    - Add an exclamation point to split it into two sentences.




    The speaker refutes the listener's position, then offers a followup action.






    share|improve this answer













    This sentence is not grammatically correct, so I assume that it was written or spoken by someone in conversation. I could see it meaning one of two things, depending on the context:




    There's no way you'd ever use a computer to show it's true.

    - Interchange ever and you'd.




    This means that you would never show that it's true using a computer.




    There's no way, ever! You'd use a computer to show it's true.

    - Add an exclamation point to split it into two sentences.




    The speaker refutes the listener's position, then offers a followup action.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 11 at 13:19









    Ian MacDonaldIan MacDonald

    3,0411017




    3,0411017













    • I've up-voted this since you have correctly pointed out that the sentence is not grammatical. And you have given a corrected version of what it almost certainly means. However I would have left out the second example, as the original was clearly not punctuated that way, and it probably adds further confusion for our Chinese OP to cope with.

      – WS2
      12 hours ago



















    • I've up-voted this since you have correctly pointed out that the sentence is not grammatical. And you have given a corrected version of what it almost certainly means. However I would have left out the second example, as the original was clearly not punctuated that way, and it probably adds further confusion for our Chinese OP to cope with.

      – WS2
      12 hours ago

















    I've up-voted this since you have correctly pointed out that the sentence is not grammatical. And you have given a corrected version of what it almost certainly means. However I would have left out the second example, as the original was clearly not punctuated that way, and it probably adds further confusion for our Chinese OP to cope with.

    – WS2
    12 hours ago





    I've up-voted this since you have correctly pointed out that the sentence is not grammatical. And you have given a corrected version of what it almost certainly means. However I would have left out the second example, as the original was clearly not punctuated that way, and it probably adds further confusion for our Chinese OP to cope with.

    – WS2
    12 hours ago













    1














    It means "One would never use a computer to show that it is true".



    We don't have context but it seems the implication is that a computer is the wrong tool for the job.



    There's no way ever = Not under any circumstances at any time (i.e. never)



    That phrase could be punctuated like this:



    There is no way, ever, (that) you i.e. "one" would use a computer to show it is true.






    share|improve this answer






























      1














      It means "One would never use a computer to show that it is true".



      We don't have context but it seems the implication is that a computer is the wrong tool for the job.



      There's no way ever = Not under any circumstances at any time (i.e. never)



      That phrase could be punctuated like this:



      There is no way, ever, (that) you i.e. "one" would use a computer to show it is true.






      share|improve this answer




























        1












        1








        1







        It means "One would never use a computer to show that it is true".



        We don't have context but it seems the implication is that a computer is the wrong tool for the job.



        There's no way ever = Not under any circumstances at any time (i.e. never)



        That phrase could be punctuated like this:



        There is no way, ever, (that) you i.e. "one" would use a computer to show it is true.






        share|improve this answer















        It means "One would never use a computer to show that it is true".



        We don't have context but it seems the implication is that a computer is the wrong tool for the job.



        There's no way ever = Not under any circumstances at any time (i.e. never)



        That phrase could be punctuated like this:



        There is no way, ever, (that) you i.e. "one" would use a computer to show it is true.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 11 at 13:03

























        answered Mar 11 at 12:21









        TRomanoTRomano

        17.9k22248




        17.9k22248






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489139%2fthe-meaning-of-theres-no-way-ever-youd-use-a-computer-to-show-its-true%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Image
            Engineer refusing to file/disclose patents Extending the spectral theorem for bounded self adjoint operators to bounded normal operators Do varchar(max), nvarchar(max) and varbinary(max) columns affect select queries? Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note? What linear sensor for a keyboard? Why don’t women say שלא עשני גויה and שפחה, according to Ashkenazim? Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets? anything or something to eat Query about absorption line spectra Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship? Fuse symbol on toroidal transformer Create all possible words using a set or letters Does the Mind Blank spell prevent the target from being frightened? Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face? When quoting, must I also copy hyphens used to divide words that continue on the next line? Hot bath for aluminium engine block and heads Journal losing indexing services Is it possib
            Read more

            Bunad

            Image
            Tradisjonelle folkedrakter frå Aust-Telemark, truleg frå 1880-åra. Drakter som dette er grunnlaget for moderne bunadar. Foto: Axel Lindahl Bunad frå Eggedal i Buskerud fotografert i 1906. Bunad (frå kledebunad , der norrønt «búnaðr» har same rot som (føre)bu) er ei samnemning brukt om klesdrakter i tradisjonell nordisk stil — ofte utvikla frå folkedrakter, men likevel i ein eigen tradisjon. Ein bunad er typisk ei forseggjort og kostbar drakt, med mykje broderi, og med handsmidde smykke i gull eller sølv, særleg dei særeigne søljene, som obligatorisk prynad i tillegg. Bunad og bunadbruk er eit debattemne med mange ulike oppfatningar, til dømes om kva som er ein bunad, og om ein kan endra på utforminga av draktene eller ikkje. Den norske bunadrørsla går tilbake til folkedansrørsla og føregangsfolk som Hulda Garborg og Klara Semb. I dag blir bunad brukt som nasjonaldrakt. Festbunad er likestilt med galla-antrekk, og ofte nytta ved særskilde høve, som konfirmasjonar eller d
            Read more

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            Image
            FæreyjarHestar færeyskahjaltlandshestinumíslenski hesturinnBretlandskolanámumenskuWikipediafæreyskuWikipediaRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeysku Færeyskur hestur Úr Wikipediu, frjálsa alfræðiritinu Jump to navigation Jump to search Rani og Grani. Grani í vetrarfeldi. Færeyski hesturinn (færeyska: Føroyska rossið ) er hestur sem hefur lifað í Færeyjum í hundruði ára. Hann er smágerður, 120-132 cm á hæð, og helst skyldur hjaltlandshestinum. Hlutverk hans var að draga vagna og plóg og bera klyfjar. Hann hefur fjórar gangtegundir eins og íslenski hesturinn (þar með talið tölt) og er með fjölda litaafbrigði. Nú til dags er hann notaður til frístunda. Í lok 19. aldar voru til um 800 hross. Mörg þeirra voru seld til Bretlands til að vinna í kolanámum og um 1960 voru aðeins nokkrir hestar eftir. Átak var gert í að varðveita hestinn og eru nú til 70-80 hross í Færeyjum. [1] Heimild |   Wikimedia Commons er með margmiðlunarefni sem te
            Read more