How can I counteract the meaning of “only” changing due to verb modifier?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







2















How can I counteract the meaning of "only" changing due to verb modifier?



"Only" has a different meaning if there is a modifier to the verb.



I want to make "I only strive towards success," mean the same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success."



If "only" wasn't a tricky word then "I only strive towards success," would mean the exact same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success." However in reality, the first sentence means that I strive and this striving is exclusively towards success. But the first sentence does not necessarily mean that the only action I do is striving towards success. And the second sentences means what I wish the first sentence meant: "The only action I do is striving towards success."



My question is the following. How can "I only strive towards success," be changed to mean the second sentences?










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 8 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 1





    “The only thing I do is strive toward success.” Is that what you’re after?

    – Jim
    Oct 27 '17 at 1:23











  • @Jim Yes. Although I think it would be better to replace "the only thing I do is strive" with "my actions only are striving."

    – user235979
    Oct 27 '17 at 3:44













  • You are free to think whatever you like.

    – Jim
    Oct 27 '17 at 3:49











  • And in any case, why would you want to focus on just the verb "strive", rather than the whole VP?

    – BillJ
    Oct 27 '17 at 8:19











  • @BillJ I don't think I only want to focus on the verb "strive." If your referring to my comment to Jim; I am not excluding the verb phrase. The full sentence would be, "My actions only are striving toward success."

    – user235979
    Oct 27 '17 at 13:52


















2















How can I counteract the meaning of "only" changing due to verb modifier?



"Only" has a different meaning if there is a modifier to the verb.



I want to make "I only strive towards success," mean the same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success."



If "only" wasn't a tricky word then "I only strive towards success," would mean the exact same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success." However in reality, the first sentence means that I strive and this striving is exclusively towards success. But the first sentence does not necessarily mean that the only action I do is striving towards success. And the second sentences means what I wish the first sentence meant: "The only action I do is striving towards success."



My question is the following. How can "I only strive towards success," be changed to mean the second sentences?










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 8 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 1





    “The only thing I do is strive toward success.” Is that what you’re after?

    – Jim
    Oct 27 '17 at 1:23











  • @Jim Yes. Although I think it would be better to replace "the only thing I do is strive" with "my actions only are striving."

    – user235979
    Oct 27 '17 at 3:44













  • You are free to think whatever you like.

    – Jim
    Oct 27 '17 at 3:49











  • And in any case, why would you want to focus on just the verb "strive", rather than the whole VP?

    – BillJ
    Oct 27 '17 at 8:19











  • @BillJ I don't think I only want to focus on the verb "strive." If your referring to my comment to Jim; I am not excluding the verb phrase. The full sentence would be, "My actions only are striving toward success."

    – user235979
    Oct 27 '17 at 13:52














2












2








2


1






How can I counteract the meaning of "only" changing due to verb modifier?



"Only" has a different meaning if there is a modifier to the verb.



I want to make "I only strive towards success," mean the same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success."



If "only" wasn't a tricky word then "I only strive towards success," would mean the exact same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success." However in reality, the first sentence means that I strive and this striving is exclusively towards success. But the first sentence does not necessarily mean that the only action I do is striving towards success. And the second sentences means what I wish the first sentence meant: "The only action I do is striving towards success."



My question is the following. How can "I only strive towards success," be changed to mean the second sentences?










share|improve this question














How can I counteract the meaning of "only" changing due to verb modifier?



"Only" has a different meaning if there is a modifier to the verb.



I want to make "I only strive towards success," mean the same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success."



If "only" wasn't a tricky word then "I only strive towards success," would mean the exact same thing as "I only strive. This striving is towards success." However in reality, the first sentence means that I strive and this striving is exclusively towards success. But the first sentence does not necessarily mean that the only action I do is striving towards success. And the second sentences means what I wish the first sentence meant: "The only action I do is striving towards success."



My question is the following. How can "I only strive towards success," be changed to mean the second sentences?







single-word-requests meaning-in-context






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Oct 27 '17 at 1:16









user235979user235979

115




115





bumped to the homepage by Community 8 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 8 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 1





    “The only thing I do is strive toward success.” Is that what you’re after?

    – Jim
    Oct 27 '17 at 1:23











  • @Jim Yes. Although I think it would be better to replace "the only thing I do is strive" with "my actions only are striving."

    – user235979
    Oct 27 '17 at 3:44













  • You are free to think whatever you like.

    – Jim
    Oct 27 '17 at 3:49











  • And in any case, why would you want to focus on just the verb "strive", rather than the whole VP?

    – BillJ
    Oct 27 '17 at 8:19











  • @BillJ I don't think I only want to focus on the verb "strive." If your referring to my comment to Jim; I am not excluding the verb phrase. The full sentence would be, "My actions only are striving toward success."

    – user235979
    Oct 27 '17 at 13:52














  • 1





    “The only thing I do is strive toward success.” Is that what you’re after?

    – Jim
    Oct 27 '17 at 1:23











  • @Jim Yes. Although I think it would be better to replace "the only thing I do is strive" with "my actions only are striving."

    – user235979
    Oct 27 '17 at 3:44













  • You are free to think whatever you like.

    – Jim
    Oct 27 '17 at 3:49











  • And in any case, why would you want to focus on just the verb "strive", rather than the whole VP?

    – BillJ
    Oct 27 '17 at 8:19











  • @BillJ I don't think I only want to focus on the verb "strive." If your referring to my comment to Jim; I am not excluding the verb phrase. The full sentence would be, "My actions only are striving toward success."

    – user235979
    Oct 27 '17 at 13:52








1




1





“The only thing I do is strive toward success.” Is that what you’re after?

– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 1:23





“The only thing I do is strive toward success.” Is that what you’re after?

– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 1:23













@Jim Yes. Although I think it would be better to replace "the only thing I do is strive" with "my actions only are striving."

– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:44







@Jim Yes. Although I think it would be better to replace "the only thing I do is strive" with "my actions only are striving."

– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 3:44















You are free to think whatever you like.

– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 3:49





You are free to think whatever you like.

– Jim
Oct 27 '17 at 3:49













And in any case, why would you want to focus on just the verb "strive", rather than the whole VP?

– BillJ
Oct 27 '17 at 8:19





And in any case, why would you want to focus on just the verb "strive", rather than the whole VP?

– BillJ
Oct 27 '17 at 8:19













@BillJ I don't think I only want to focus on the verb "strive." If your referring to my comment to Jim; I am not excluding the verb phrase. The full sentence would be, "My actions only are striving toward success."

– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 13:52





@BillJ I don't think I only want to focus on the verb "strive." If your referring to my comment to Jim; I am not excluding the verb phrase. The full sentence would be, "My actions only are striving toward success."

– user235979
Oct 27 '17 at 13:52










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















0














As with any adverb, the precise position of the adverb makes a difference: before/after the verb/verb phrase and before/after the clause/sentence.



As with most words, only has a variety of shades of meaning, and we see that in your sentence:




I only strive towards success.




First there is one you mention: the only thing I strive for is success.
Then there is the broader sense: the only thing I do is strive for success.
Then there is an apologetic sense: I was only doing my best to succeed.
Then there is an alternation sense: Only I wasn't trying to fail but to succeed.



Generally language is ambiguous, and the longer and more complex the sentence the more ambiguous it tends to be. Sometimes the best way to clarify is by breaking the sentence up, or by following with a disambiguating phrase or sentence, as you have explored. Sometimes you can move the adverb or change the tense to clarify. Often you don't need to do anything because it is clear in context.



Consider these variants (not all of which sound natural with the verb phrase used) - you can match them against the four shades of meaning above (exercise for the reader, figure out the permutation and the logic):





  1. Only I strive towards success.

  2. I only strive towards success.

  3. I strive only towards success.

  4. I strive towards success only.




So the answer to the question is "move it": move the "only" to the place that gives the intended meaning!






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    This does provide helpful information. However it doesn't seem to answer the question.

    – user235979
    Oct 27 '17 at 3:28











  • The answer to the question, as encapsulated here, is to move it in relation to the verb and its modifier. Added as the final paragraph.

    – David M W Powers
    Nov 21 '17 at 14:22





















0














I'm not sure I see any difference between the meanings of




  • I only strive towards success.

  • I only strive. This striving is towards success.


But, since only is a quantifier with a stressed focus element, if you want to make strive the focus, just stress it. Normally one would stress success as the focus of only, and stressing the last word in a sentence is a natural pattern, so that's almost the automatic interpretation.




BTW, by stress, I mean say it LOUDer (the first syllable of louder is stressed). English has several levels of stress, and most words have a stressed syllable; further, every sentence has words that are stressed or unstressed. This is why we're not often confused about what only means in speech; that only happens in writing, which doesn't represent stress.







share|improve this answer































    0














    "I only strive towards success." -- ambiguous.



    We mean

    "(I only strive) (towards success)."



    So it would be,

    "I only strive, towards success." -- the comma removes all doubt, and serves just that purpose, being otherwise redundant.






    share|improve this answer
























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "97"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415950%2fhow-can-i-counteract-the-meaning-of-only-changing-due-to-verb-modifier%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0














      As with any adverb, the precise position of the adverb makes a difference: before/after the verb/verb phrase and before/after the clause/sentence.



      As with most words, only has a variety of shades of meaning, and we see that in your sentence:




      I only strive towards success.




      First there is one you mention: the only thing I strive for is success.
      Then there is the broader sense: the only thing I do is strive for success.
      Then there is an apologetic sense: I was only doing my best to succeed.
      Then there is an alternation sense: Only I wasn't trying to fail but to succeed.



      Generally language is ambiguous, and the longer and more complex the sentence the more ambiguous it tends to be. Sometimes the best way to clarify is by breaking the sentence up, or by following with a disambiguating phrase or sentence, as you have explored. Sometimes you can move the adverb or change the tense to clarify. Often you don't need to do anything because it is clear in context.



      Consider these variants (not all of which sound natural with the verb phrase used) - you can match them against the four shades of meaning above (exercise for the reader, figure out the permutation and the logic):





      1. Only I strive towards success.

      2. I only strive towards success.

      3. I strive only towards success.

      4. I strive towards success only.




      So the answer to the question is "move it": move the "only" to the place that gives the intended meaning!






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        This does provide helpful information. However it doesn't seem to answer the question.

        – user235979
        Oct 27 '17 at 3:28











      • The answer to the question, as encapsulated here, is to move it in relation to the verb and its modifier. Added as the final paragraph.

        – David M W Powers
        Nov 21 '17 at 14:22


















      0














      As with any adverb, the precise position of the adverb makes a difference: before/after the verb/verb phrase and before/after the clause/sentence.



      As with most words, only has a variety of shades of meaning, and we see that in your sentence:




      I only strive towards success.




      First there is one you mention: the only thing I strive for is success.
      Then there is the broader sense: the only thing I do is strive for success.
      Then there is an apologetic sense: I was only doing my best to succeed.
      Then there is an alternation sense: Only I wasn't trying to fail but to succeed.



      Generally language is ambiguous, and the longer and more complex the sentence the more ambiguous it tends to be. Sometimes the best way to clarify is by breaking the sentence up, or by following with a disambiguating phrase or sentence, as you have explored. Sometimes you can move the adverb or change the tense to clarify. Often you don't need to do anything because it is clear in context.



      Consider these variants (not all of which sound natural with the verb phrase used) - you can match them against the four shades of meaning above (exercise for the reader, figure out the permutation and the logic):





      1. Only I strive towards success.

      2. I only strive towards success.

      3. I strive only towards success.

      4. I strive towards success only.




      So the answer to the question is "move it": move the "only" to the place that gives the intended meaning!






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        This does provide helpful information. However it doesn't seem to answer the question.

        – user235979
        Oct 27 '17 at 3:28











      • The answer to the question, as encapsulated here, is to move it in relation to the verb and its modifier. Added as the final paragraph.

        – David M W Powers
        Nov 21 '17 at 14:22
















      0












      0








      0







      As with any adverb, the precise position of the adverb makes a difference: before/after the verb/verb phrase and before/after the clause/sentence.



      As with most words, only has a variety of shades of meaning, and we see that in your sentence:




      I only strive towards success.




      First there is one you mention: the only thing I strive for is success.
      Then there is the broader sense: the only thing I do is strive for success.
      Then there is an apologetic sense: I was only doing my best to succeed.
      Then there is an alternation sense: Only I wasn't trying to fail but to succeed.



      Generally language is ambiguous, and the longer and more complex the sentence the more ambiguous it tends to be. Sometimes the best way to clarify is by breaking the sentence up, or by following with a disambiguating phrase or sentence, as you have explored. Sometimes you can move the adverb or change the tense to clarify. Often you don't need to do anything because it is clear in context.



      Consider these variants (not all of which sound natural with the verb phrase used) - you can match them against the four shades of meaning above (exercise for the reader, figure out the permutation and the logic):





      1. Only I strive towards success.

      2. I only strive towards success.

      3. I strive only towards success.

      4. I strive towards success only.




      So the answer to the question is "move it": move the "only" to the place that gives the intended meaning!






      share|improve this answer















      As with any adverb, the precise position of the adverb makes a difference: before/after the verb/verb phrase and before/after the clause/sentence.



      As with most words, only has a variety of shades of meaning, and we see that in your sentence:




      I only strive towards success.




      First there is one you mention: the only thing I strive for is success.
      Then there is the broader sense: the only thing I do is strive for success.
      Then there is an apologetic sense: I was only doing my best to succeed.
      Then there is an alternation sense: Only I wasn't trying to fail but to succeed.



      Generally language is ambiguous, and the longer and more complex the sentence the more ambiguous it tends to be. Sometimes the best way to clarify is by breaking the sentence up, or by following with a disambiguating phrase or sentence, as you have explored. Sometimes you can move the adverb or change the tense to clarify. Often you don't need to do anything because it is clear in context.



      Consider these variants (not all of which sound natural with the verb phrase used) - you can match them against the four shades of meaning above (exercise for the reader, figure out the permutation and the logic):





      1. Only I strive towards success.

      2. I only strive towards success.

      3. I strive only towards success.

      4. I strive towards success only.




      So the answer to the question is "move it": move the "only" to the place that gives the intended meaning!







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Nov 21 '17 at 14:24

























      answered Oct 27 '17 at 1:39









      David M W PowersDavid M W Powers

      1,242812




      1,242812








      • 1





        This does provide helpful information. However it doesn't seem to answer the question.

        – user235979
        Oct 27 '17 at 3:28











      • The answer to the question, as encapsulated here, is to move it in relation to the verb and its modifier. Added as the final paragraph.

        – David M W Powers
        Nov 21 '17 at 14:22
















      • 1





        This does provide helpful information. However it doesn't seem to answer the question.

        – user235979
        Oct 27 '17 at 3:28











      • The answer to the question, as encapsulated here, is to move it in relation to the verb and its modifier. Added as the final paragraph.

        – David M W Powers
        Nov 21 '17 at 14:22










      1




      1





      This does provide helpful information. However it doesn't seem to answer the question.

      – user235979
      Oct 27 '17 at 3:28





      This does provide helpful information. However it doesn't seem to answer the question.

      – user235979
      Oct 27 '17 at 3:28













      The answer to the question, as encapsulated here, is to move it in relation to the verb and its modifier. Added as the final paragraph.

      – David M W Powers
      Nov 21 '17 at 14:22







      The answer to the question, as encapsulated here, is to move it in relation to the verb and its modifier. Added as the final paragraph.

      – David M W Powers
      Nov 21 '17 at 14:22















      0














      I'm not sure I see any difference between the meanings of




      • I only strive towards success.

      • I only strive. This striving is towards success.


      But, since only is a quantifier with a stressed focus element, if you want to make strive the focus, just stress it. Normally one would stress success as the focus of only, and stressing the last word in a sentence is a natural pattern, so that's almost the automatic interpretation.




      BTW, by stress, I mean say it LOUDer (the first syllable of louder is stressed). English has several levels of stress, and most words have a stressed syllable; further, every sentence has words that are stressed or unstressed. This is why we're not often confused about what only means in speech; that only happens in writing, which doesn't represent stress.







      share|improve this answer




























        0














        I'm not sure I see any difference between the meanings of




        • I only strive towards success.

        • I only strive. This striving is towards success.


        But, since only is a quantifier with a stressed focus element, if you want to make strive the focus, just stress it. Normally one would stress success as the focus of only, and stressing the last word in a sentence is a natural pattern, so that's almost the automatic interpretation.




        BTW, by stress, I mean say it LOUDer (the first syllable of louder is stressed). English has several levels of stress, and most words have a stressed syllable; further, every sentence has words that are stressed or unstressed. This is why we're not often confused about what only means in speech; that only happens in writing, which doesn't represent stress.







        share|improve this answer


























          0












          0








          0







          I'm not sure I see any difference between the meanings of




          • I only strive towards success.

          • I only strive. This striving is towards success.


          But, since only is a quantifier with a stressed focus element, if you want to make strive the focus, just stress it. Normally one would stress success as the focus of only, and stressing the last word in a sentence is a natural pattern, so that's almost the automatic interpretation.




          BTW, by stress, I mean say it LOUDer (the first syllable of louder is stressed). English has several levels of stress, and most words have a stressed syllable; further, every sentence has words that are stressed or unstressed. This is why we're not often confused about what only means in speech; that only happens in writing, which doesn't represent stress.







          share|improve this answer













          I'm not sure I see any difference between the meanings of




          • I only strive towards success.

          • I only strive. This striving is towards success.


          But, since only is a quantifier with a stressed focus element, if you want to make strive the focus, just stress it. Normally one would stress success as the focus of only, and stressing the last word in a sentence is a natural pattern, so that's almost the automatic interpretation.




          BTW, by stress, I mean say it LOUDer (the first syllable of louder is stressed). English has several levels of stress, and most words have a stressed syllable; further, every sentence has words that are stressed or unstressed. This is why we're not often confused about what only means in speech; that only happens in writing, which doesn't represent stress.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Feb 19 '18 at 21:50









          John LawlerJohn Lawler

          85.2k6118336




          85.2k6118336























              0














              "I only strive towards success." -- ambiguous.



              We mean

              "(I only strive) (towards success)."



              So it would be,

              "I only strive, towards success." -- the comma removes all doubt, and serves just that purpose, being otherwise redundant.






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                "I only strive towards success." -- ambiguous.



                We mean

                "(I only strive) (towards success)."



                So it would be,

                "I only strive, towards success." -- the comma removes all doubt, and serves just that purpose, being otherwise redundant.






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  "I only strive towards success." -- ambiguous.



                  We mean

                  "(I only strive) (towards success)."



                  So it would be,

                  "I only strive, towards success." -- the comma removes all doubt, and serves just that purpose, being otherwise redundant.






                  share|improve this answer













                  "I only strive towards success." -- ambiguous.



                  We mean

                  "(I only strive) (towards success)."



                  So it would be,

                  "I only strive, towards success." -- the comma removes all doubt, and serves just that purpose, being otherwise redundant.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Jun 20 '18 at 13:39









                  KrisKris

                  33k641124




                  33k641124






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415950%2fhow-can-i-counteract-the-meaning-of-only-changing-due-to-verb-modifier%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                      He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                      Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029