Why does the resolve message appear first?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







11















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise {status: "pending"}


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}

})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise {status: "pending"}









share|improve this question




















  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    7 hours ago











  • You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

    – Kev
    6 hours ago






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    6 hours ago






  • 4





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    6 hours ago


















11















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise {status: "pending"}


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}

})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise {status: "pending"}









share|improve this question




















  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    7 hours ago











  • You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

    – Kev
    6 hours ago






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    6 hours ago






  • 4





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    6 hours ago














11












11








11


3






I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise {status: "pending"}


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}

})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise {status: "pending"}









share|improve this question
















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise {status: "pending"}


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}

})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}


at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise {status: "pending"}






javascript es6-promise






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 19 mins ago









Boann

37.5k1291123




37.5k1291123










asked 7 hours ago









EdwinEdwin

614




614








  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    7 hours ago











  • You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

    – Kev
    6 hours ago






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    6 hours ago






  • 4





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    6 hours ago














  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    7 hours ago











  • You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

    – Kev
    6 hours ago






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    6 hours ago






  • 4





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    6 hours ago








3




3





You are creating new promise on every iteration

– brk
7 hours ago





You are creating new promise on every iteration

– brk
7 hours ago













You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

– Kev
6 hours ago





You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

– Kev
6 hours ago




5




5





Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

– junvar
6 hours ago





Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

– junvar
6 hours ago




2




2





Yes Junvar. That is my question.

– Edwin
6 hours ago





Yes Junvar. That is my question.

– Edwin
6 hours ago




4




4





99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

– jhpratt
6 hours ago





99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

– jhpratt
6 hours ago












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
p.catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    5 hours ago



















2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

await p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    5 hours ago



















0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :




  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval


previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






    let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve('micro task thread');
});

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
});
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer
























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    5 hours ago



















0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}





share|improve this answer


























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    5 hours ago












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55734046%2fwhy-does-the-resolve-message-appear-first%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
p.catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    5 hours ago
















4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
p.catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    5 hours ago














4












4








4







You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
p.catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer













You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
p.catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})


Output:



enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









ludovicoludovico

875




875













  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    5 hours ago



















  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    5 hours ago

















i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

– Yanis-git
5 hours ago





i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

– Yanis-git
5 hours ago













2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

await p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    5 hours ago
















2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

await p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    5 hours ago














2












2








2







The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

await p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer













The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

await p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
})
}


Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









Esdras XavierEsdras Xavier

45017




45017








  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    5 hours ago














  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    5 hours ago








1




1





well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

– pushkin
6 hours ago





well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

– pushkin
6 hours ago




1




1





Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

– Edwin
5 hours ago





Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

– Edwin
5 hours ago











0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :




  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval


previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






    let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve('micro task thread');
});

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
});
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer
























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    5 hours ago
















0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :




  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval


previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






    let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve('micro task thread');
});

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
});
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer
























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    5 hours ago














0












0








0







Because JavaScript are mono thread :




  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval


previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






    let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve('micro task thread');
});

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
});
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer













Because JavaScript are mono thread :




  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval


previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






    let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve('micro task thread');
});

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
});
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






    let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve('micro task thread');
});

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
});
console.log('main thread');





    let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolve('micro task thread');
});

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}).catch((message) => {
console.log(message)
});
console.log('main thread');






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









Yanis-gitYanis-git

2,6291725




2,6291725













  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    5 hours ago



















  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    5 hours ago

















@Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

– Yanis-git
5 hours ago





@Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

– Yanis-git
5 hours ago











0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}





share|improve this answer


























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    5 hours ago
















0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}





share|improve this answer


























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    5 hours ago














0












0








0







I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}





share|improve this answer















I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2) {
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
} else {
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)
}
})

p.then((message) => {
console.log(message)
}, failed => {
console.log(failed)
})
}






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago









pushkin

4,726113055




4,726113055










answered 5 hours ago









EdwinEdwin

614




614













  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    5 hours ago



















  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    5 hours ago

















I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

– jhpratt
5 hours ago





I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

– jhpratt
5 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55734046%2fwhy-does-the-resolve-message-appear-first%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029