Does the Vanguard Style bonus stack with itself?Aid Another, Swift Aid and Aid Allies (Order of the Dragon)Aid another bonus type?Creating a defensive NPC warrior buildCan Saving Shield and Bodyguard stack?How Do Granted Saving Throws Interact with the Dying Condition?Can Vital Strike be used with the Mind Knight Path maneuver?Can a whip be used with the Bodyguard feat?When is the Bodyguard feat used?Aid Another, Swift Aid and Aid Allies (Order of the Dragon)Do multiple lantern archon's Aura of Menace debuffs stack?Can creatures with Spell Resistance voluntarily fail saving throws?Do skill bonuses stack?

Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?

Can i spend a night at Vancouver then take a flight to my college in Toronto as an international student?

How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?

Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?

Interpret a multiple linear regression when Y is log transformed

Checks user level and limit the data before saving it to mongoDB

Does Gita support doctrine of eternal cycle of birth and death for evil people?

How does a program know if stdout is connected to a terminal or a pipe?

Is there an official tutorial for installing Ubuntu 18.04+ on a device with an SSD and an additional internal hard drive?

Symbolic Multivariate Distribution

Why other Westeros houses don't use wildfire?

Which big number is bigger?

Does holding a wand and speaking its command word count as V/S/M spell components?

How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?

Largest value of determinant

What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?

How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?

Lock file naming pattern

Don’t seats that recline flat defeat the purpose of having seatbelts?

How to pronounce 'C++' in Spanish

Can we say “you can pay when the order gets ready”?

To say I met a person for the first time

Real-world applications of fields, rings and groups in linear algebra.

Can SQL Server create collisions in system generated constraint names?



Does the Vanguard Style bonus stack with itself?


Aid Another, Swift Aid and Aid Allies (Order of the Dragon)Aid another bonus type?Creating a defensive NPC warrior buildCan Saving Shield and Bodyguard stack?How Do Granted Saving Throws Interact with the Dying Condition?Can Vital Strike be used with the Mind Knight Path maneuver?Can a whip be used with the Bodyguard feat?When is the Bodyguard feat used?Aid Another, Swift Aid and Aid Allies (Order of the Dragon)Do multiple lantern archon's Aura of Menace debuffs stack?Can creatures with Spell Resistance voluntarily fail saving throws?Do skill bonuses stack?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


The Vanguard Style feat states :




While using this style, when an adjacent ally is required to make a Reflex saving throw, you can expend a use of an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s Reflex save. Your ally gains a +2 bonus to all Reflex saves while adjacent to you until the beginning of your next turn.




Unlike other effects based on attacks of opportunity and the aid another action, like Bodyguard, the target keeps the bonus until the vanguard's next turn beginning.



This bonus seems to be untyped and as stated about the Aid Another action in combat :




Multiple characters can aid the same friend, and similar bonuses stack.




Does that mean that if an ally of a character using the Vanguard Style is required to make several Reflex saving throws during the same round, the user of the Vanguard Style can use it each time (with enough attacks of opportunity available) and, each time, the ally will obtain a cumulative +2 bonus on its Reflex save ?



I can't find anything wrong with this reasoning but the result seems rather strong to me, especially if a build improving the aid another bonuses is involved.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    4












    $begingroup$


    The Vanguard Style feat states :




    While using this style, when an adjacent ally is required to make a Reflex saving throw, you can expend a use of an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s Reflex save. Your ally gains a +2 bonus to all Reflex saves while adjacent to you until the beginning of your next turn.




    Unlike other effects based on attacks of opportunity and the aid another action, like Bodyguard, the target keeps the bonus until the vanguard's next turn beginning.



    This bonus seems to be untyped and as stated about the Aid Another action in combat :




    Multiple characters can aid the same friend, and similar bonuses stack.




    Does that mean that if an ally of a character using the Vanguard Style is required to make several Reflex saving throws during the same round, the user of the Vanguard Style can use it each time (with enough attacks of opportunity available) and, each time, the ally will obtain a cumulative +2 bonus on its Reflex save ?



    I can't find anything wrong with this reasoning but the result seems rather strong to me, especially if a build improving the aid another bonuses is involved.










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      The Vanguard Style feat states :




      While using this style, when an adjacent ally is required to make a Reflex saving throw, you can expend a use of an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s Reflex save. Your ally gains a +2 bonus to all Reflex saves while adjacent to you until the beginning of your next turn.




      Unlike other effects based on attacks of opportunity and the aid another action, like Bodyguard, the target keeps the bonus until the vanguard's next turn beginning.



      This bonus seems to be untyped and as stated about the Aid Another action in combat :




      Multiple characters can aid the same friend, and similar bonuses stack.




      Does that mean that if an ally of a character using the Vanguard Style is required to make several Reflex saving throws during the same round, the user of the Vanguard Style can use it each time (with enough attacks of opportunity available) and, each time, the ally will obtain a cumulative +2 bonus on its Reflex save ?



      I can't find anything wrong with this reasoning but the result seems rather strong to me, especially if a build improving the aid another bonuses is involved.










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The Vanguard Style feat states :




      While using this style, when an adjacent ally is required to make a Reflex saving throw, you can expend a use of an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s Reflex save. Your ally gains a +2 bonus to all Reflex saves while adjacent to you until the beginning of your next turn.




      Unlike other effects based on attacks of opportunity and the aid another action, like Bodyguard, the target keeps the bonus until the vanguard's next turn beginning.



      This bonus seems to be untyped and as stated about the Aid Another action in combat :




      Multiple characters can aid the same friend, and similar bonuses stack.




      Does that mean that if an ally of a character using the Vanguard Style is required to make several Reflex saving throws during the same round, the user of the Vanguard Style can use it each time (with enough attacks of opportunity available) and, each time, the ally will obtain a cumulative +2 bonus on its Reflex save ?



      I can't find anything wrong with this reasoning but the result seems rather strong to me, especially if a build improving the aid another bonuses is involved.







      pathfinder feats saving-throw stacking






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 28 at 12:19









      Sdjz

      14.1k468114




      14.1k468114










      asked Mar 28 at 11:34









      RopheRophe

      531211




      531211




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          No, it cannot stack with itself



          Bonuses from the same source (feat, spell, class ability, racial ability, etc) will never stack with themselves, as clarified in the definition of Bonus:




          Bonuses are numerical values that are added to checks and statistical scores. Most bonuses have a type, and as a general rule, bonuses of the same type are not cumulative (do not “stack”)—only the greater bonus granted applies.



          The important aspect of bonus types is that two bonuses of the same type don’t generally stack. With the exception of dodge bonuses, most circumstance bonuses, and racial bonuses, only the better bonus of a given type works. Bonuses without a type always stack, unless they are from the same source.




          So, using the same feat twice will not grant it's bonus twice. Similarly, using the spell Bull's Strength twice (even if two different casters do it) will not grant a total of +8 to Strength.



          Unless said ability specifically says that it stacks, but those are rare. For example, the Fleet feat.



          As for being strong or not, I would rather not suggest allowing an exception and trust (with a grain of salt) that the developer who wrote it to decide if the feat balanced or not. There are feats with similar effects that call that they stack, and a bunch of Aid Another(-ish) type feats that do not stack, and the benefit of this feat is granting an ally the benefits of another feat for one round (Lightning Reflexes) which seems balanced (to me) for a feat. Especially if you consider that despite the requirement, you are not actually required to use a heavy shield (it could be a tower shield), and you could grant the Vanguard Style bonus to multiple allies against a single area attack.



          Multiple Aid Another actions from different allies will stack. While most of Paizo's community mostly agrees that one character still cannot make multiple Aid Another on the same person (evidenced by how it also didn't stack in D&D 3.5), it is unclear and should be discussed with your GM. Here, however, the source of the bonus is not the Aid Another action, but the Vanguard Style feat.



          Similarly, a cavalier of the order of the dragon cannot use their Aid Allies multiple times on the same ally, because the ability is not increasing the bonuses from Aid Another, but replacing its effects by something else. However, it may be used together with other abilities that increase the bonus received from Aid Another, such as the Helpful trait.



          If ruled that they should stack, there are several combinations of class abilities, feats, and traits that can increase the bonus from Aid Another, and if this mechanic is interpreted as presented here, you could spend 3 or 4 AoO attempts to get a +20 (or higher) to reflex saves on demand. See order of the dragon, Helpful, Pathfinder Chronicler, Inheritor etc. This wouldn't be that powerful if they also couldn't do the same to grant up to +14 to AC whenever necessary combining Benevolent, Bodyguard, and so many other abilities that can increase Aid Another's bonus to AC by spending attacks of opportunity out of their turn.



          Vanguard Style alone is pretty bad



          The feat, as written, has very similar wording to the Bodyguard feat, which, according to this FAQ on Bodyguard, still has the same limitations of the Aid Another action:




          • The attacker must be within your threatened area;

          • The ally must be adjacent.

          This means that you will only be able to help on reflex saves if the attacker is very close to both of you, such as a dragon's breath or a point-blank fireball. Which is why it must be combined with Combat Patrol (which increases your threatened area) and reach weapons so it can be efficient. Using the next feat in the chain, Vanguard Hustle removes the attacker's restriction on the bonus as long as that ally is within your threatened area, but the attack must still be within your threatened area to use Bodyguard or Vanguard Style on another ally, or to activate it again on an ally that left the area.



          While the author of Bodyguard, Jason Nelson, has clarified that he originally intended for Bodyguard to be used against any attackers, not only those who you threaten, he also said that he misremembered how those rules worked and it might have affected the wording of the feat. But even after he posted that clarified, the FAQ that came afterwards has clear on it requiring the attacker to be within the threatened area of the bodyguard character.



          That said, if you are the GM, you may rule the feat however you want outside of PFS, which is the only scenario where GMs are required to rule according to the rules as written. That would give more power to the feat, sure, but the feat alone is pretty bad, as I said earlier, only getting better (due to the increased range and options) when applied with other feats. Ruling that it works on regardless of the location of the attacker simply means that one specific (and rare) use of Aid Another will get buffed, nothing else.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I don't believe the Bodyguard FAQ is relevant here. The Aid Another Action specifically requires an attack roll, which I believe is what requires the Threatening. Vanguard is improving Reflex saves, and does not appear to involve an enemy at all.
            $endgroup$
            – YogoZuno
            Mar 29 at 2:17










          • $begingroup$
            "When an adjacent ally is attacked, you may use an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s AC. "
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 2:50










          • $begingroup$
            "when an adjacent ally is required to make a Reflex saving throw, you can expend a use of an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s Reflex save."
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 2:51










          • $begingroup$
            FAQ aside, I think using the RAI (at the very least outside of Society play, if not within it as well) is a logical way of running both feat, and this answer would be better if it merely pointed out possible issues instead of soapboxing.
            $endgroup$
            – Ifusaso
            Mar 29 at 11:47










          • $begingroup$
            @Ifusaso RAI only works when the developers have said anything about the feat. Here, only the original author of Bodyguard has said anything and that was about his version of the feat pre-publishing. We have no RAI for Vanguard Style.
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 11:53



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Multiple bonuses from the same source without a type do not stack, unless they specifically say otherwise.



          In this case, Vanguard Style states it is an Aid Another action. The Aid Another action explicitly states




          Multiple characters can aid the same friend, and similar bonuses stack.




          where is explicitly states that the stacking rules are modified here.



          The intention of this sentence seems to be that "each aiding character counts as a different source for stacking purposes", but it doesn't quite state it. Instead, it explicitly states that similar bonuses stack without restricting it to similar bonuses from multiple different characters only.



          Usually this doesn't matter, as a single character finds it difficult to aid another multiple times on the same action of their friend. However, this use of aid another extends the duration of the bonus, hence the quirk.



          I'd argue that this is a typo. But if you want to follow the rules as written,



          The Vanguard Style bonus stacks with itself



          About the only way this would be "too strong" is if you can exploit a way to do something useful with a huge reflex save bonus, and trigger multiple reflex saves for a cheap enough cost that the useful thing is strong.



          If your ally is taking 10 reflex saves while adjacent to you and after the 5th one they auto-succeed, that wouldn't be a worry to me. It is a pretty crazy bonus, but it is to a reactive scenario that isn't what you call common.



          I'm unaware of a way you can turn a huge reflex save bonus into being invulnerable in general, or even better use a huge reflex save bonus into a tool to defeat a foe. I'm also unaware of a cheap way to induce 10 or so reflex saves at-will (so as to always have the bonus up).






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            (Although it's for Pathfinder's antecedent D&D 3.5 — but uses similar Pathfinder language — , this question and its answer addresses the typing and stackability (stackiness? stackosity?) of multiple successful aid another attempts.)
            $endgroup$
            – Hey I Can Chan
            Mar 28 at 14:05










          • $begingroup$
            I realize my remark about this situation being strong drew more attention than I expected. I mentioned it because with the help of just some traits or items, some could easily raise the bonus to a cumulative +4 or more. Nonetheless, this remains specific to reflex saves and, fortunately, I'm also unaware at how it could be exploited to do something else.
            $endgroup$
            – Rophe
            Mar 28 at 14:46










          • $begingroup$
            +4? You are thinking low. I can reach +8 before level 10, per AoO.
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 28 at 15:13






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            For the record, using this interpretion ("Vanguard Style is an Aid Another action"), wouldn't it also mean that the attacker must be within the Vanguard Style character's threatened area (as described under Aid Another) in order to qualify for the Aid Another action? So it would only grant reflex save bonus against point-blank fireballs?
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 28 at 15:27










          • $begingroup$
            @ShadowKras In this case, it should be comparable to the Bodyguard feat : depending on where you are looking for, it's right, or not...
            $endgroup$
            – Rophe
            Mar 28 at 15:45











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144083%2fdoes-the-vanguard-style-bonus-stack-with-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5












          $begingroup$

          No, it cannot stack with itself



          Bonuses from the same source (feat, spell, class ability, racial ability, etc) will never stack with themselves, as clarified in the definition of Bonus:




          Bonuses are numerical values that are added to checks and statistical scores. Most bonuses have a type, and as a general rule, bonuses of the same type are not cumulative (do not “stack”)—only the greater bonus granted applies.



          The important aspect of bonus types is that two bonuses of the same type don’t generally stack. With the exception of dodge bonuses, most circumstance bonuses, and racial bonuses, only the better bonus of a given type works. Bonuses without a type always stack, unless they are from the same source.




          So, using the same feat twice will not grant it's bonus twice. Similarly, using the spell Bull's Strength twice (even if two different casters do it) will not grant a total of +8 to Strength.



          Unless said ability specifically says that it stacks, but those are rare. For example, the Fleet feat.



          As for being strong or not, I would rather not suggest allowing an exception and trust (with a grain of salt) that the developer who wrote it to decide if the feat balanced or not. There are feats with similar effects that call that they stack, and a bunch of Aid Another(-ish) type feats that do not stack, and the benefit of this feat is granting an ally the benefits of another feat for one round (Lightning Reflexes) which seems balanced (to me) for a feat. Especially if you consider that despite the requirement, you are not actually required to use a heavy shield (it could be a tower shield), and you could grant the Vanguard Style bonus to multiple allies against a single area attack.



          Multiple Aid Another actions from different allies will stack. While most of Paizo's community mostly agrees that one character still cannot make multiple Aid Another on the same person (evidenced by how it also didn't stack in D&D 3.5), it is unclear and should be discussed with your GM. Here, however, the source of the bonus is not the Aid Another action, but the Vanguard Style feat.



          Similarly, a cavalier of the order of the dragon cannot use their Aid Allies multiple times on the same ally, because the ability is not increasing the bonuses from Aid Another, but replacing its effects by something else. However, it may be used together with other abilities that increase the bonus received from Aid Another, such as the Helpful trait.



          If ruled that they should stack, there are several combinations of class abilities, feats, and traits that can increase the bonus from Aid Another, and if this mechanic is interpreted as presented here, you could spend 3 or 4 AoO attempts to get a +20 (or higher) to reflex saves on demand. See order of the dragon, Helpful, Pathfinder Chronicler, Inheritor etc. This wouldn't be that powerful if they also couldn't do the same to grant up to +14 to AC whenever necessary combining Benevolent, Bodyguard, and so many other abilities that can increase Aid Another's bonus to AC by spending attacks of opportunity out of their turn.



          Vanguard Style alone is pretty bad



          The feat, as written, has very similar wording to the Bodyguard feat, which, according to this FAQ on Bodyguard, still has the same limitations of the Aid Another action:




          • The attacker must be within your threatened area;

          • The ally must be adjacent.

          This means that you will only be able to help on reflex saves if the attacker is very close to both of you, such as a dragon's breath or a point-blank fireball. Which is why it must be combined with Combat Patrol (which increases your threatened area) and reach weapons so it can be efficient. Using the next feat in the chain, Vanguard Hustle removes the attacker's restriction on the bonus as long as that ally is within your threatened area, but the attack must still be within your threatened area to use Bodyguard or Vanguard Style on another ally, or to activate it again on an ally that left the area.



          While the author of Bodyguard, Jason Nelson, has clarified that he originally intended for Bodyguard to be used against any attackers, not only those who you threaten, he also said that he misremembered how those rules worked and it might have affected the wording of the feat. But even after he posted that clarified, the FAQ that came afterwards has clear on it requiring the attacker to be within the threatened area of the bodyguard character.



          That said, if you are the GM, you may rule the feat however you want outside of PFS, which is the only scenario where GMs are required to rule according to the rules as written. That would give more power to the feat, sure, but the feat alone is pretty bad, as I said earlier, only getting better (due to the increased range and options) when applied with other feats. Ruling that it works on regardless of the location of the attacker simply means that one specific (and rare) use of Aid Another will get buffed, nothing else.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I don't believe the Bodyguard FAQ is relevant here. The Aid Another Action specifically requires an attack roll, which I believe is what requires the Threatening. Vanguard is improving Reflex saves, and does not appear to involve an enemy at all.
            $endgroup$
            – YogoZuno
            Mar 29 at 2:17










          • $begingroup$
            "When an adjacent ally is attacked, you may use an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s AC. "
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 2:50










          • $begingroup$
            "when an adjacent ally is required to make a Reflex saving throw, you can expend a use of an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s Reflex save."
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 2:51










          • $begingroup$
            FAQ aside, I think using the RAI (at the very least outside of Society play, if not within it as well) is a logical way of running both feat, and this answer would be better if it merely pointed out possible issues instead of soapboxing.
            $endgroup$
            – Ifusaso
            Mar 29 at 11:47










          • $begingroup$
            @Ifusaso RAI only works when the developers have said anything about the feat. Here, only the original author of Bodyguard has said anything and that was about his version of the feat pre-publishing. We have no RAI for Vanguard Style.
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 11:53
















          5












          $begingroup$

          No, it cannot stack with itself



          Bonuses from the same source (feat, spell, class ability, racial ability, etc) will never stack with themselves, as clarified in the definition of Bonus:




          Bonuses are numerical values that are added to checks and statistical scores. Most bonuses have a type, and as a general rule, bonuses of the same type are not cumulative (do not “stack”)—only the greater bonus granted applies.



          The important aspect of bonus types is that two bonuses of the same type don’t generally stack. With the exception of dodge bonuses, most circumstance bonuses, and racial bonuses, only the better bonus of a given type works. Bonuses without a type always stack, unless they are from the same source.




          So, using the same feat twice will not grant it's bonus twice. Similarly, using the spell Bull's Strength twice (even if two different casters do it) will not grant a total of +8 to Strength.



          Unless said ability specifically says that it stacks, but those are rare. For example, the Fleet feat.



          As for being strong or not, I would rather not suggest allowing an exception and trust (with a grain of salt) that the developer who wrote it to decide if the feat balanced or not. There are feats with similar effects that call that they stack, and a bunch of Aid Another(-ish) type feats that do not stack, and the benefit of this feat is granting an ally the benefits of another feat for one round (Lightning Reflexes) which seems balanced (to me) for a feat. Especially if you consider that despite the requirement, you are not actually required to use a heavy shield (it could be a tower shield), and you could grant the Vanguard Style bonus to multiple allies against a single area attack.



          Multiple Aid Another actions from different allies will stack. While most of Paizo's community mostly agrees that one character still cannot make multiple Aid Another on the same person (evidenced by how it also didn't stack in D&D 3.5), it is unclear and should be discussed with your GM. Here, however, the source of the bonus is not the Aid Another action, but the Vanguard Style feat.



          Similarly, a cavalier of the order of the dragon cannot use their Aid Allies multiple times on the same ally, because the ability is not increasing the bonuses from Aid Another, but replacing its effects by something else. However, it may be used together with other abilities that increase the bonus received from Aid Another, such as the Helpful trait.



          If ruled that they should stack, there are several combinations of class abilities, feats, and traits that can increase the bonus from Aid Another, and if this mechanic is interpreted as presented here, you could spend 3 or 4 AoO attempts to get a +20 (or higher) to reflex saves on demand. See order of the dragon, Helpful, Pathfinder Chronicler, Inheritor etc. This wouldn't be that powerful if they also couldn't do the same to grant up to +14 to AC whenever necessary combining Benevolent, Bodyguard, and so many other abilities that can increase Aid Another's bonus to AC by spending attacks of opportunity out of their turn.



          Vanguard Style alone is pretty bad



          The feat, as written, has very similar wording to the Bodyguard feat, which, according to this FAQ on Bodyguard, still has the same limitations of the Aid Another action:




          • The attacker must be within your threatened area;

          • The ally must be adjacent.

          This means that you will only be able to help on reflex saves if the attacker is very close to both of you, such as a dragon's breath or a point-blank fireball. Which is why it must be combined with Combat Patrol (which increases your threatened area) and reach weapons so it can be efficient. Using the next feat in the chain, Vanguard Hustle removes the attacker's restriction on the bonus as long as that ally is within your threatened area, but the attack must still be within your threatened area to use Bodyguard or Vanguard Style on another ally, or to activate it again on an ally that left the area.



          While the author of Bodyguard, Jason Nelson, has clarified that he originally intended for Bodyguard to be used against any attackers, not only those who you threaten, he also said that he misremembered how those rules worked and it might have affected the wording of the feat. But even after he posted that clarified, the FAQ that came afterwards has clear on it requiring the attacker to be within the threatened area of the bodyguard character.



          That said, if you are the GM, you may rule the feat however you want outside of PFS, which is the only scenario where GMs are required to rule according to the rules as written. That would give more power to the feat, sure, but the feat alone is pretty bad, as I said earlier, only getting better (due to the increased range and options) when applied with other feats. Ruling that it works on regardless of the location of the attacker simply means that one specific (and rare) use of Aid Another will get buffed, nothing else.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I don't believe the Bodyguard FAQ is relevant here. The Aid Another Action specifically requires an attack roll, which I believe is what requires the Threatening. Vanguard is improving Reflex saves, and does not appear to involve an enemy at all.
            $endgroup$
            – YogoZuno
            Mar 29 at 2:17










          • $begingroup$
            "When an adjacent ally is attacked, you may use an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s AC. "
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 2:50










          • $begingroup$
            "when an adjacent ally is required to make a Reflex saving throw, you can expend a use of an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s Reflex save."
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 2:51










          • $begingroup$
            FAQ aside, I think using the RAI (at the very least outside of Society play, if not within it as well) is a logical way of running both feat, and this answer would be better if it merely pointed out possible issues instead of soapboxing.
            $endgroup$
            – Ifusaso
            Mar 29 at 11:47










          • $begingroup$
            @Ifusaso RAI only works when the developers have said anything about the feat. Here, only the original author of Bodyguard has said anything and that was about his version of the feat pre-publishing. We have no RAI for Vanguard Style.
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 11:53














          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          No, it cannot stack with itself



          Bonuses from the same source (feat, spell, class ability, racial ability, etc) will never stack with themselves, as clarified in the definition of Bonus:




          Bonuses are numerical values that are added to checks and statistical scores. Most bonuses have a type, and as a general rule, bonuses of the same type are not cumulative (do not “stack”)—only the greater bonus granted applies.



          The important aspect of bonus types is that two bonuses of the same type don’t generally stack. With the exception of dodge bonuses, most circumstance bonuses, and racial bonuses, only the better bonus of a given type works. Bonuses without a type always stack, unless they are from the same source.




          So, using the same feat twice will not grant it's bonus twice. Similarly, using the spell Bull's Strength twice (even if two different casters do it) will not grant a total of +8 to Strength.



          Unless said ability specifically says that it stacks, but those are rare. For example, the Fleet feat.



          As for being strong or not, I would rather not suggest allowing an exception and trust (with a grain of salt) that the developer who wrote it to decide if the feat balanced or not. There are feats with similar effects that call that they stack, and a bunch of Aid Another(-ish) type feats that do not stack, and the benefit of this feat is granting an ally the benefits of another feat for one round (Lightning Reflexes) which seems balanced (to me) for a feat. Especially if you consider that despite the requirement, you are not actually required to use a heavy shield (it could be a tower shield), and you could grant the Vanguard Style bonus to multiple allies against a single area attack.



          Multiple Aid Another actions from different allies will stack. While most of Paizo's community mostly agrees that one character still cannot make multiple Aid Another on the same person (evidenced by how it also didn't stack in D&D 3.5), it is unclear and should be discussed with your GM. Here, however, the source of the bonus is not the Aid Another action, but the Vanguard Style feat.



          Similarly, a cavalier of the order of the dragon cannot use their Aid Allies multiple times on the same ally, because the ability is not increasing the bonuses from Aid Another, but replacing its effects by something else. However, it may be used together with other abilities that increase the bonus received from Aid Another, such as the Helpful trait.



          If ruled that they should stack, there are several combinations of class abilities, feats, and traits that can increase the bonus from Aid Another, and if this mechanic is interpreted as presented here, you could spend 3 or 4 AoO attempts to get a +20 (or higher) to reflex saves on demand. See order of the dragon, Helpful, Pathfinder Chronicler, Inheritor etc. This wouldn't be that powerful if they also couldn't do the same to grant up to +14 to AC whenever necessary combining Benevolent, Bodyguard, and so many other abilities that can increase Aid Another's bonus to AC by spending attacks of opportunity out of their turn.



          Vanguard Style alone is pretty bad



          The feat, as written, has very similar wording to the Bodyguard feat, which, according to this FAQ on Bodyguard, still has the same limitations of the Aid Another action:




          • The attacker must be within your threatened area;

          • The ally must be adjacent.

          This means that you will only be able to help on reflex saves if the attacker is very close to both of you, such as a dragon's breath or a point-blank fireball. Which is why it must be combined with Combat Patrol (which increases your threatened area) and reach weapons so it can be efficient. Using the next feat in the chain, Vanguard Hustle removes the attacker's restriction on the bonus as long as that ally is within your threatened area, but the attack must still be within your threatened area to use Bodyguard or Vanguard Style on another ally, or to activate it again on an ally that left the area.



          While the author of Bodyguard, Jason Nelson, has clarified that he originally intended for Bodyguard to be used against any attackers, not only those who you threaten, he also said that he misremembered how those rules worked and it might have affected the wording of the feat. But even after he posted that clarified, the FAQ that came afterwards has clear on it requiring the attacker to be within the threatened area of the bodyguard character.



          That said, if you are the GM, you may rule the feat however you want outside of PFS, which is the only scenario where GMs are required to rule according to the rules as written. That would give more power to the feat, sure, but the feat alone is pretty bad, as I said earlier, only getting better (due to the increased range and options) when applied with other feats. Ruling that it works on regardless of the location of the attacker simply means that one specific (and rare) use of Aid Another will get buffed, nothing else.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          No, it cannot stack with itself



          Bonuses from the same source (feat, spell, class ability, racial ability, etc) will never stack with themselves, as clarified in the definition of Bonus:




          Bonuses are numerical values that are added to checks and statistical scores. Most bonuses have a type, and as a general rule, bonuses of the same type are not cumulative (do not “stack”)—only the greater bonus granted applies.



          The important aspect of bonus types is that two bonuses of the same type don’t generally stack. With the exception of dodge bonuses, most circumstance bonuses, and racial bonuses, only the better bonus of a given type works. Bonuses without a type always stack, unless they are from the same source.




          So, using the same feat twice will not grant it's bonus twice. Similarly, using the spell Bull's Strength twice (even if two different casters do it) will not grant a total of +8 to Strength.



          Unless said ability specifically says that it stacks, but those are rare. For example, the Fleet feat.



          As for being strong or not, I would rather not suggest allowing an exception and trust (with a grain of salt) that the developer who wrote it to decide if the feat balanced or not. There are feats with similar effects that call that they stack, and a bunch of Aid Another(-ish) type feats that do not stack, and the benefit of this feat is granting an ally the benefits of another feat for one round (Lightning Reflexes) which seems balanced (to me) for a feat. Especially if you consider that despite the requirement, you are not actually required to use a heavy shield (it could be a tower shield), and you could grant the Vanguard Style bonus to multiple allies against a single area attack.



          Multiple Aid Another actions from different allies will stack. While most of Paizo's community mostly agrees that one character still cannot make multiple Aid Another on the same person (evidenced by how it also didn't stack in D&D 3.5), it is unclear and should be discussed with your GM. Here, however, the source of the bonus is not the Aid Another action, but the Vanguard Style feat.



          Similarly, a cavalier of the order of the dragon cannot use their Aid Allies multiple times on the same ally, because the ability is not increasing the bonuses from Aid Another, but replacing its effects by something else. However, it may be used together with other abilities that increase the bonus received from Aid Another, such as the Helpful trait.



          If ruled that they should stack, there are several combinations of class abilities, feats, and traits that can increase the bonus from Aid Another, and if this mechanic is interpreted as presented here, you could spend 3 or 4 AoO attempts to get a +20 (or higher) to reflex saves on demand. See order of the dragon, Helpful, Pathfinder Chronicler, Inheritor etc. This wouldn't be that powerful if they also couldn't do the same to grant up to +14 to AC whenever necessary combining Benevolent, Bodyguard, and so many other abilities that can increase Aid Another's bonus to AC by spending attacks of opportunity out of their turn.



          Vanguard Style alone is pretty bad



          The feat, as written, has very similar wording to the Bodyguard feat, which, according to this FAQ on Bodyguard, still has the same limitations of the Aid Another action:




          • The attacker must be within your threatened area;

          • The ally must be adjacent.

          This means that you will only be able to help on reflex saves if the attacker is very close to both of you, such as a dragon's breath or a point-blank fireball. Which is why it must be combined with Combat Patrol (which increases your threatened area) and reach weapons so it can be efficient. Using the next feat in the chain, Vanguard Hustle removes the attacker's restriction on the bonus as long as that ally is within your threatened area, but the attack must still be within your threatened area to use Bodyguard or Vanguard Style on another ally, or to activate it again on an ally that left the area.



          While the author of Bodyguard, Jason Nelson, has clarified that he originally intended for Bodyguard to be used against any attackers, not only those who you threaten, he also said that he misremembered how those rules worked and it might have affected the wording of the feat. But even after he posted that clarified, the FAQ that came afterwards has clear on it requiring the attacker to be within the threatened area of the bodyguard character.



          That said, if you are the GM, you may rule the feat however you want outside of PFS, which is the only scenario where GMs are required to rule according to the rules as written. That would give more power to the feat, sure, but the feat alone is pretty bad, as I said earlier, only getting better (due to the increased range and options) when applied with other feats. Ruling that it works on regardless of the location of the attacker simply means that one specific (and rare) use of Aid Another will get buffed, nothing else.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 29 at 12:05

























          answered Mar 28 at 11:41









          ShadowKrasShadowKras

          54.8k378141




          54.8k378141







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I don't believe the Bodyguard FAQ is relevant here. The Aid Another Action specifically requires an attack roll, which I believe is what requires the Threatening. Vanguard is improving Reflex saves, and does not appear to involve an enemy at all.
            $endgroup$
            – YogoZuno
            Mar 29 at 2:17










          • $begingroup$
            "When an adjacent ally is attacked, you may use an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s AC. "
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 2:50










          • $begingroup$
            "when an adjacent ally is required to make a Reflex saving throw, you can expend a use of an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s Reflex save."
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 2:51










          • $begingroup$
            FAQ aside, I think using the RAI (at the very least outside of Society play, if not within it as well) is a logical way of running both feat, and this answer would be better if it merely pointed out possible issues instead of soapboxing.
            $endgroup$
            – Ifusaso
            Mar 29 at 11:47










          • $begingroup$
            @Ifusaso RAI only works when the developers have said anything about the feat. Here, only the original author of Bodyguard has said anything and that was about his version of the feat pre-publishing. We have no RAI for Vanguard Style.
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 11:53













          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I don't believe the Bodyguard FAQ is relevant here. The Aid Another Action specifically requires an attack roll, which I believe is what requires the Threatening. Vanguard is improving Reflex saves, and does not appear to involve an enemy at all.
            $endgroup$
            – YogoZuno
            Mar 29 at 2:17










          • $begingroup$
            "When an adjacent ally is attacked, you may use an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s AC. "
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 2:50










          • $begingroup$
            "when an adjacent ally is required to make a Reflex saving throw, you can expend a use of an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s Reflex save."
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 2:51










          • $begingroup$
            FAQ aside, I think using the RAI (at the very least outside of Society play, if not within it as well) is a logical way of running both feat, and this answer would be better if it merely pointed out possible issues instead of soapboxing.
            $endgroup$
            – Ifusaso
            Mar 29 at 11:47










          • $begingroup$
            @Ifusaso RAI only works when the developers have said anything about the feat. Here, only the original author of Bodyguard has said anything and that was about his version of the feat pre-publishing. We have no RAI for Vanguard Style.
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 29 at 11:53








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          I don't believe the Bodyguard FAQ is relevant here. The Aid Another Action specifically requires an attack roll, which I believe is what requires the Threatening. Vanguard is improving Reflex saves, and does not appear to involve an enemy at all.
          $endgroup$
          – YogoZuno
          Mar 29 at 2:17




          $begingroup$
          I don't believe the Bodyguard FAQ is relevant here. The Aid Another Action specifically requires an attack roll, which I believe is what requires the Threatening. Vanguard is improving Reflex saves, and does not appear to involve an enemy at all.
          $endgroup$
          – YogoZuno
          Mar 29 at 2:17












          $begingroup$
          "When an adjacent ally is attacked, you may use an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s AC. "
          $endgroup$
          – ShadowKras
          Mar 29 at 2:50




          $begingroup$
          "When an adjacent ally is attacked, you may use an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s AC. "
          $endgroup$
          – ShadowKras
          Mar 29 at 2:50












          $begingroup$
          "when an adjacent ally is required to make a Reflex saving throw, you can expend a use of an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s Reflex save."
          $endgroup$
          – ShadowKras
          Mar 29 at 2:51




          $begingroup$
          "when an adjacent ally is required to make a Reflex saving throw, you can expend a use of an attack of opportunity to attempt the aid another action to improve your ally’s Reflex save."
          $endgroup$
          – ShadowKras
          Mar 29 at 2:51












          $begingroup$
          FAQ aside, I think using the RAI (at the very least outside of Society play, if not within it as well) is a logical way of running both feat, and this answer would be better if it merely pointed out possible issues instead of soapboxing.
          $endgroup$
          – Ifusaso
          Mar 29 at 11:47




          $begingroup$
          FAQ aside, I think using the RAI (at the very least outside of Society play, if not within it as well) is a logical way of running both feat, and this answer would be better if it merely pointed out possible issues instead of soapboxing.
          $endgroup$
          – Ifusaso
          Mar 29 at 11:47












          $begingroup$
          @Ifusaso RAI only works when the developers have said anything about the feat. Here, only the original author of Bodyguard has said anything and that was about his version of the feat pre-publishing. We have no RAI for Vanguard Style.
          $endgroup$
          – ShadowKras
          Mar 29 at 11:53





          $begingroup$
          @Ifusaso RAI only works when the developers have said anything about the feat. Here, only the original author of Bodyguard has said anything and that was about his version of the feat pre-publishing. We have no RAI for Vanguard Style.
          $endgroup$
          – ShadowKras
          Mar 29 at 11:53














          1












          $begingroup$

          Multiple bonuses from the same source without a type do not stack, unless they specifically say otherwise.



          In this case, Vanguard Style states it is an Aid Another action. The Aid Another action explicitly states




          Multiple characters can aid the same friend, and similar bonuses stack.




          where is explicitly states that the stacking rules are modified here.



          The intention of this sentence seems to be that "each aiding character counts as a different source for stacking purposes", but it doesn't quite state it. Instead, it explicitly states that similar bonuses stack without restricting it to similar bonuses from multiple different characters only.



          Usually this doesn't matter, as a single character finds it difficult to aid another multiple times on the same action of their friend. However, this use of aid another extends the duration of the bonus, hence the quirk.



          I'd argue that this is a typo. But if you want to follow the rules as written,



          The Vanguard Style bonus stacks with itself



          About the only way this would be "too strong" is if you can exploit a way to do something useful with a huge reflex save bonus, and trigger multiple reflex saves for a cheap enough cost that the useful thing is strong.



          If your ally is taking 10 reflex saves while adjacent to you and after the 5th one they auto-succeed, that wouldn't be a worry to me. It is a pretty crazy bonus, but it is to a reactive scenario that isn't what you call common.



          I'm unaware of a way you can turn a huge reflex save bonus into being invulnerable in general, or even better use a huge reflex save bonus into a tool to defeat a foe. I'm also unaware of a cheap way to induce 10 or so reflex saves at-will (so as to always have the bonus up).






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            (Although it's for Pathfinder's antecedent D&D 3.5 — but uses similar Pathfinder language — , this question and its answer addresses the typing and stackability (stackiness? stackosity?) of multiple successful aid another attempts.)
            $endgroup$
            – Hey I Can Chan
            Mar 28 at 14:05










          • $begingroup$
            I realize my remark about this situation being strong drew more attention than I expected. I mentioned it because with the help of just some traits or items, some could easily raise the bonus to a cumulative +4 or more. Nonetheless, this remains specific to reflex saves and, fortunately, I'm also unaware at how it could be exploited to do something else.
            $endgroup$
            – Rophe
            Mar 28 at 14:46










          • $begingroup$
            +4? You are thinking low. I can reach +8 before level 10, per AoO.
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 28 at 15:13






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            For the record, using this interpretion ("Vanguard Style is an Aid Another action"), wouldn't it also mean that the attacker must be within the Vanguard Style character's threatened area (as described under Aid Another) in order to qualify for the Aid Another action? So it would only grant reflex save bonus against point-blank fireballs?
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 28 at 15:27










          • $begingroup$
            @ShadowKras In this case, it should be comparable to the Bodyguard feat : depending on where you are looking for, it's right, or not...
            $endgroup$
            – Rophe
            Mar 28 at 15:45















          1












          $begingroup$

          Multiple bonuses from the same source without a type do not stack, unless they specifically say otherwise.



          In this case, Vanguard Style states it is an Aid Another action. The Aid Another action explicitly states




          Multiple characters can aid the same friend, and similar bonuses stack.




          where is explicitly states that the stacking rules are modified here.



          The intention of this sentence seems to be that "each aiding character counts as a different source for stacking purposes", but it doesn't quite state it. Instead, it explicitly states that similar bonuses stack without restricting it to similar bonuses from multiple different characters only.



          Usually this doesn't matter, as a single character finds it difficult to aid another multiple times on the same action of their friend. However, this use of aid another extends the duration of the bonus, hence the quirk.



          I'd argue that this is a typo. But if you want to follow the rules as written,



          The Vanguard Style bonus stacks with itself



          About the only way this would be "too strong" is if you can exploit a way to do something useful with a huge reflex save bonus, and trigger multiple reflex saves for a cheap enough cost that the useful thing is strong.



          If your ally is taking 10 reflex saves while adjacent to you and after the 5th one they auto-succeed, that wouldn't be a worry to me. It is a pretty crazy bonus, but it is to a reactive scenario that isn't what you call common.



          I'm unaware of a way you can turn a huge reflex save bonus into being invulnerable in general, or even better use a huge reflex save bonus into a tool to defeat a foe. I'm also unaware of a cheap way to induce 10 or so reflex saves at-will (so as to always have the bonus up).






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            (Although it's for Pathfinder's antecedent D&D 3.5 — but uses similar Pathfinder language — , this question and its answer addresses the typing and stackability (stackiness? stackosity?) of multiple successful aid another attempts.)
            $endgroup$
            – Hey I Can Chan
            Mar 28 at 14:05










          • $begingroup$
            I realize my remark about this situation being strong drew more attention than I expected. I mentioned it because with the help of just some traits or items, some could easily raise the bonus to a cumulative +4 or more. Nonetheless, this remains specific to reflex saves and, fortunately, I'm also unaware at how it could be exploited to do something else.
            $endgroup$
            – Rophe
            Mar 28 at 14:46










          • $begingroup$
            +4? You are thinking low. I can reach +8 before level 10, per AoO.
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 28 at 15:13






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            For the record, using this interpretion ("Vanguard Style is an Aid Another action"), wouldn't it also mean that the attacker must be within the Vanguard Style character's threatened area (as described under Aid Another) in order to qualify for the Aid Another action? So it would only grant reflex save bonus against point-blank fireballs?
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 28 at 15:27










          • $begingroup$
            @ShadowKras In this case, it should be comparable to the Bodyguard feat : depending on where you are looking for, it's right, or not...
            $endgroup$
            – Rophe
            Mar 28 at 15:45













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Multiple bonuses from the same source without a type do not stack, unless they specifically say otherwise.



          In this case, Vanguard Style states it is an Aid Another action. The Aid Another action explicitly states




          Multiple characters can aid the same friend, and similar bonuses stack.




          where is explicitly states that the stacking rules are modified here.



          The intention of this sentence seems to be that "each aiding character counts as a different source for stacking purposes", but it doesn't quite state it. Instead, it explicitly states that similar bonuses stack without restricting it to similar bonuses from multiple different characters only.



          Usually this doesn't matter, as a single character finds it difficult to aid another multiple times on the same action of their friend. However, this use of aid another extends the duration of the bonus, hence the quirk.



          I'd argue that this is a typo. But if you want to follow the rules as written,



          The Vanguard Style bonus stacks with itself



          About the only way this would be "too strong" is if you can exploit a way to do something useful with a huge reflex save bonus, and trigger multiple reflex saves for a cheap enough cost that the useful thing is strong.



          If your ally is taking 10 reflex saves while adjacent to you and after the 5th one they auto-succeed, that wouldn't be a worry to me. It is a pretty crazy bonus, but it is to a reactive scenario that isn't what you call common.



          I'm unaware of a way you can turn a huge reflex save bonus into being invulnerable in general, or even better use a huge reflex save bonus into a tool to defeat a foe. I'm also unaware of a cheap way to induce 10 or so reflex saves at-will (so as to always have the bonus up).






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Multiple bonuses from the same source without a type do not stack, unless they specifically say otherwise.



          In this case, Vanguard Style states it is an Aid Another action. The Aid Another action explicitly states




          Multiple characters can aid the same friend, and similar bonuses stack.




          where is explicitly states that the stacking rules are modified here.



          The intention of this sentence seems to be that "each aiding character counts as a different source for stacking purposes", but it doesn't quite state it. Instead, it explicitly states that similar bonuses stack without restricting it to similar bonuses from multiple different characters only.



          Usually this doesn't matter, as a single character finds it difficult to aid another multiple times on the same action of their friend. However, this use of aid another extends the duration of the bonus, hence the quirk.



          I'd argue that this is a typo. But if you want to follow the rules as written,



          The Vanguard Style bonus stacks with itself



          About the only way this would be "too strong" is if you can exploit a way to do something useful with a huge reflex save bonus, and trigger multiple reflex saves for a cheap enough cost that the useful thing is strong.



          If your ally is taking 10 reflex saves while adjacent to you and after the 5th one they auto-succeed, that wouldn't be a worry to me. It is a pretty crazy bonus, but it is to a reactive scenario that isn't what you call common.



          I'm unaware of a way you can turn a huge reflex save bonus into being invulnerable in general, or even better use a huge reflex save bonus into a tool to defeat a foe. I'm also unaware of a cheap way to induce 10 or so reflex saves at-will (so as to always have the bonus up).







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 28 at 14:43

























          answered Mar 28 at 13:44









          YakkYakk

          8,0091143




          8,0091143







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            (Although it's for Pathfinder's antecedent D&D 3.5 — but uses similar Pathfinder language — , this question and its answer addresses the typing and stackability (stackiness? stackosity?) of multiple successful aid another attempts.)
            $endgroup$
            – Hey I Can Chan
            Mar 28 at 14:05










          • $begingroup$
            I realize my remark about this situation being strong drew more attention than I expected. I mentioned it because with the help of just some traits or items, some could easily raise the bonus to a cumulative +4 or more. Nonetheless, this remains specific to reflex saves and, fortunately, I'm also unaware at how it could be exploited to do something else.
            $endgroup$
            – Rophe
            Mar 28 at 14:46










          • $begingroup$
            +4? You are thinking low. I can reach +8 before level 10, per AoO.
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 28 at 15:13






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            For the record, using this interpretion ("Vanguard Style is an Aid Another action"), wouldn't it also mean that the attacker must be within the Vanguard Style character's threatened area (as described under Aid Another) in order to qualify for the Aid Another action? So it would only grant reflex save bonus against point-blank fireballs?
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 28 at 15:27










          • $begingroup$
            @ShadowKras In this case, it should be comparable to the Bodyguard feat : depending on where you are looking for, it's right, or not...
            $endgroup$
            – Rophe
            Mar 28 at 15:45












          • 2




            $begingroup$
            (Although it's for Pathfinder's antecedent D&D 3.5 — but uses similar Pathfinder language — , this question and its answer addresses the typing and stackability (stackiness? stackosity?) of multiple successful aid another attempts.)
            $endgroup$
            – Hey I Can Chan
            Mar 28 at 14:05










          • $begingroup$
            I realize my remark about this situation being strong drew more attention than I expected. I mentioned it because with the help of just some traits or items, some could easily raise the bonus to a cumulative +4 or more. Nonetheless, this remains specific to reflex saves and, fortunately, I'm also unaware at how it could be exploited to do something else.
            $endgroup$
            – Rophe
            Mar 28 at 14:46










          • $begingroup$
            +4? You are thinking low. I can reach +8 before level 10, per AoO.
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 28 at 15:13






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            For the record, using this interpretion ("Vanguard Style is an Aid Another action"), wouldn't it also mean that the attacker must be within the Vanguard Style character's threatened area (as described under Aid Another) in order to qualify for the Aid Another action? So it would only grant reflex save bonus against point-blank fireballs?
            $endgroup$
            – ShadowKras
            Mar 28 at 15:27










          • $begingroup$
            @ShadowKras In this case, it should be comparable to the Bodyguard feat : depending on where you are looking for, it's right, or not...
            $endgroup$
            – Rophe
            Mar 28 at 15:45







          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          (Although it's for Pathfinder's antecedent D&D 3.5 — but uses similar Pathfinder language — , this question and its answer addresses the typing and stackability (stackiness? stackosity?) of multiple successful aid another attempts.)
          $endgroup$
          – Hey I Can Chan
          Mar 28 at 14:05




          $begingroup$
          (Although it's for Pathfinder's antecedent D&D 3.5 — but uses similar Pathfinder language — , this question and its answer addresses the typing and stackability (stackiness? stackosity?) of multiple successful aid another attempts.)
          $endgroup$
          – Hey I Can Chan
          Mar 28 at 14:05












          $begingroup$
          I realize my remark about this situation being strong drew more attention than I expected. I mentioned it because with the help of just some traits or items, some could easily raise the bonus to a cumulative +4 or more. Nonetheless, this remains specific to reflex saves and, fortunately, I'm also unaware at how it could be exploited to do something else.
          $endgroup$
          – Rophe
          Mar 28 at 14:46




          $begingroup$
          I realize my remark about this situation being strong drew more attention than I expected. I mentioned it because with the help of just some traits or items, some could easily raise the bonus to a cumulative +4 or more. Nonetheless, this remains specific to reflex saves and, fortunately, I'm also unaware at how it could be exploited to do something else.
          $endgroup$
          – Rophe
          Mar 28 at 14:46












          $begingroup$
          +4? You are thinking low. I can reach +8 before level 10, per AoO.
          $endgroup$
          – ShadowKras
          Mar 28 at 15:13




          $begingroup$
          +4? You are thinking low. I can reach +8 before level 10, per AoO.
          $endgroup$
          – ShadowKras
          Mar 28 at 15:13




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          For the record, using this interpretion ("Vanguard Style is an Aid Another action"), wouldn't it also mean that the attacker must be within the Vanguard Style character's threatened area (as described under Aid Another) in order to qualify for the Aid Another action? So it would only grant reflex save bonus against point-blank fireballs?
          $endgroup$
          – ShadowKras
          Mar 28 at 15:27




          $begingroup$
          For the record, using this interpretion ("Vanguard Style is an Aid Another action"), wouldn't it also mean that the attacker must be within the Vanguard Style character's threatened area (as described under Aid Another) in order to qualify for the Aid Another action? So it would only grant reflex save bonus against point-blank fireballs?
          $endgroup$
          – ShadowKras
          Mar 28 at 15:27












          $begingroup$
          @ShadowKras In this case, it should be comparable to the Bodyguard feat : depending on where you are looking for, it's right, or not...
          $endgroup$
          – Rophe
          Mar 28 at 15:45




          $begingroup$
          @ShadowKras In this case, it should be comparable to the Bodyguard feat : depending on where you are looking for, it's right, or not...
          $endgroup$
          – Rophe
          Mar 28 at 15:45

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144083%2fdoes-the-vanguard-style-bonus-stack-with-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

          What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

          Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029