Is there a word that can describe something is good but not better than very few others?Is there a better word than “colorizable”?A word that means you need to be better or do better but not necessarily better than othersIs there a word that means to see something but not be able to describe?What is a good word to describe someone that is good at playing with others gullibilitySingle word for something that is “not yet a fact” but very close?Word for something that represents, but is not, something abstractWhat's a good substitute for “outnumber”?How can I describe someone that acts like they don't care about others opinions, but does.Is there a word for an object that is no longer kept for its original purpose but instead for sentimental value?Word to describe “not very old” movie
Don’t seats that recline flat defeat the purpose of having seatbelts?
Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?
what is the sudo password for a --disabled-password user
Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?
Apply MapThread to all but one variable
Fizzy, soft, pop and still drinks
Seemingly unused edef prior to an ifx mysteriously affects the outcome of the ifx. Why?
Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?
What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?
Is there a way to get a compiler for the original B programming language?
Question about かな and だろう
Why does nature favour the Laplacian?
How can I place the product on a social media post better?
Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?
a sore throat vs a strep throat vs strep throat
How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?
A Note on N!
TIKZ - changing one block into parallel multiple blocks
What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?
How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?
The Defining Moment
How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?
Can SQL Server create collisions in system generated constraint names?
Which big number is bigger?
Is there a word that can describe something is good but not better than very few others?
Is there a better word than “colorizable”?A word that means you need to be better or do better but not necessarily better than othersIs there a word that means to see something but not be able to describe?What is a good word to describe someone that is good at playing with others gullibilitySingle word for something that is “not yet a fact” but very close?Word for something that represents, but is not, something abstractWhat's a good substitute for “outnumber”?How can I describe someone that acts like they don't care about others opinions, but does.Is there a word for an object that is no longer kept for its original purpose but instead for sentimental value?Word to describe “not very old” movie
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Is there a word that can describe something is good but not better than very few others? I have found the adjective competitive.
However, competitive seems not appropriate. Because it has a meaning that the compared stuff is the best.
For example:
Joey gets 93 points in an exam.
Rose gets 99.
Chandler gets 88 points.
Phoebe gets 89.
Monica gets 98.
Rachel gets 78.
Joey's result is not better than that of Rose and Monica, but better than that of Chandler, Phoebe, and Rachel. How do I describe Joey's result in a positive way?
What I used before is:
Joey gets a competitive result among the six people.
I'd prefer an adjective.
single-word-requests word-choice
add a comment |
Is there a word that can describe something is good but not better than very few others? I have found the adjective competitive.
However, competitive seems not appropriate. Because it has a meaning that the compared stuff is the best.
For example:
Joey gets 93 points in an exam.
Rose gets 99.
Chandler gets 88 points.
Phoebe gets 89.
Monica gets 98.
Rachel gets 78.
Joey's result is not better than that of Rose and Monica, but better than that of Chandler, Phoebe, and Rachel. How do I describe Joey's result in a positive way?
What I used before is:
Joey gets a competitive result among the six people.
I'd prefer an adjective.
single-word-requests word-choice
1
Midrange, adequate, second tier? "Regional powerhouse" for college sport teams.
– user662852
Aug 2 '17 at 11:15
third-best
– Mari-Lou A
Aug 2 '17 at 11:20
1
"Top-tier" and "competitive" both have positive connotations. "Adequate" and "acceptable" are much less positive. "Respectable" is probably what I would use to give it a very slight positive spin.
– Solocutor
Jan 29 at 21:41
Midpack. C’s that get degrees.
– Rusty Core
Mar 1 at 0:35
add a comment |
Is there a word that can describe something is good but not better than very few others? I have found the adjective competitive.
However, competitive seems not appropriate. Because it has a meaning that the compared stuff is the best.
For example:
Joey gets 93 points in an exam.
Rose gets 99.
Chandler gets 88 points.
Phoebe gets 89.
Monica gets 98.
Rachel gets 78.
Joey's result is not better than that of Rose and Monica, but better than that of Chandler, Phoebe, and Rachel. How do I describe Joey's result in a positive way?
What I used before is:
Joey gets a competitive result among the six people.
I'd prefer an adjective.
single-word-requests word-choice
Is there a word that can describe something is good but not better than very few others? I have found the adjective competitive.
However, competitive seems not appropriate. Because it has a meaning that the compared stuff is the best.
For example:
Joey gets 93 points in an exam.
Rose gets 99.
Chandler gets 88 points.
Phoebe gets 89.
Monica gets 98.
Rachel gets 78.
Joey's result is not better than that of Rose and Monica, but better than that of Chandler, Phoebe, and Rachel. How do I describe Joey's result in a positive way?
What I used before is:
Joey gets a competitive result among the six people.
I'd prefer an adjective.
single-word-requests word-choice
single-word-requests word-choice
edited Aug 2 '17 at 11:09
Mari-Lou A
63.5k57230469
63.5k57230469
asked Aug 2 '17 at 6:34
abanaban
1556
1556
1
Midrange, adequate, second tier? "Regional powerhouse" for college sport teams.
– user662852
Aug 2 '17 at 11:15
third-best
– Mari-Lou A
Aug 2 '17 at 11:20
1
"Top-tier" and "competitive" both have positive connotations. "Adequate" and "acceptable" are much less positive. "Respectable" is probably what I would use to give it a very slight positive spin.
– Solocutor
Jan 29 at 21:41
Midpack. C’s that get degrees.
– Rusty Core
Mar 1 at 0:35
add a comment |
1
Midrange, adequate, second tier? "Regional powerhouse" for college sport teams.
– user662852
Aug 2 '17 at 11:15
third-best
– Mari-Lou A
Aug 2 '17 at 11:20
1
"Top-tier" and "competitive" both have positive connotations. "Adequate" and "acceptable" are much less positive. "Respectable" is probably what I would use to give it a very slight positive spin.
– Solocutor
Jan 29 at 21:41
Midpack. C’s that get degrees.
– Rusty Core
Mar 1 at 0:35
1
1
Midrange, adequate, second tier? "Regional powerhouse" for college sport teams.
– user662852
Aug 2 '17 at 11:15
Midrange, adequate, second tier? "Regional powerhouse" for college sport teams.
– user662852
Aug 2 '17 at 11:15
third-best
– Mari-Lou A
Aug 2 '17 at 11:20
third-best
– Mari-Lou A
Aug 2 '17 at 11:20
1
1
"Top-tier" and "competitive" both have positive connotations. "Adequate" and "acceptable" are much less positive. "Respectable" is probably what I would use to give it a very slight positive spin.
– Solocutor
Jan 29 at 21:41
"Top-tier" and "competitive" both have positive connotations. "Adequate" and "acceptable" are much less positive. "Respectable" is probably what I would use to give it a very slight positive spin.
– Solocutor
Jan 29 at 21:41
Midpack. C’s that get degrees.
– Rusty Core
Mar 1 at 0:35
Midpack. C’s that get degrees.
– Rusty Core
Mar 1 at 0:35
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Joey got an A on his exam describes his result in a positive way, assuming scores of 90 or above receive a letter grade of A. Or you can say Joey got the third highest score on the exam.
add a comment |
Perhaps "fine"? As in "Joey did fine on his exam". Or "This pizza is fine". It certainly doesn't carry any thought of the thing being bad - the thing is clearly acceptable, even slightly better than average, but it's not going to win any awards.
add a comment |
The words "distinguishable", "notable", "honorable", "worthy", "admirable" and "laudable" would all be adjectives that suggest a place among a top tier of competitors, but also one that (probably) follows behind the few very highest of achievers.
Joey received a notable result among the six people.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/distinguishable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/notable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/worthy
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/honorable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/laudable
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f403877%2fis-there-a-word-that-can-describe-something-is-good-but-not-better-than-very-few%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Joey got an A on his exam describes his result in a positive way, assuming scores of 90 or above receive a letter grade of A. Or you can say Joey got the third highest score on the exam.
add a comment |
Joey got an A on his exam describes his result in a positive way, assuming scores of 90 or above receive a letter grade of A. Or you can say Joey got the third highest score on the exam.
add a comment |
Joey got an A on his exam describes his result in a positive way, assuming scores of 90 or above receive a letter grade of A. Or you can say Joey got the third highest score on the exam.
Joey got an A on his exam describes his result in a positive way, assuming scores of 90 or above receive a letter grade of A. Or you can say Joey got the third highest score on the exam.
answered Aug 2 '17 at 9:49
AmE speakerAmE speaker
4,43821546
4,43821546
add a comment |
add a comment |
Perhaps "fine"? As in "Joey did fine on his exam". Or "This pizza is fine". It certainly doesn't carry any thought of the thing being bad - the thing is clearly acceptable, even slightly better than average, but it's not going to win any awards.
add a comment |
Perhaps "fine"? As in "Joey did fine on his exam". Or "This pizza is fine". It certainly doesn't carry any thought of the thing being bad - the thing is clearly acceptable, even slightly better than average, but it's not going to win any awards.
add a comment |
Perhaps "fine"? As in "Joey did fine on his exam". Or "This pizza is fine". It certainly doesn't carry any thought of the thing being bad - the thing is clearly acceptable, even slightly better than average, but it's not going to win any awards.
Perhaps "fine"? As in "Joey did fine on his exam". Or "This pizza is fine". It certainly doesn't carry any thought of the thing being bad - the thing is clearly acceptable, even slightly better than average, but it's not going to win any awards.
answered Feb 28 at 22:14
David RiceDavid Rice
1011
1011
add a comment |
add a comment |
The words "distinguishable", "notable", "honorable", "worthy", "admirable" and "laudable" would all be adjectives that suggest a place among a top tier of competitors, but also one that (probably) follows behind the few very highest of achievers.
Joey received a notable result among the six people.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/distinguishable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/notable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/worthy
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/honorable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/laudable
add a comment |
The words "distinguishable", "notable", "honorable", "worthy", "admirable" and "laudable" would all be adjectives that suggest a place among a top tier of competitors, but also one that (probably) follows behind the few very highest of achievers.
Joey received a notable result among the six people.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/distinguishable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/notable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/worthy
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/honorable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/laudable
add a comment |
The words "distinguishable", "notable", "honorable", "worthy", "admirable" and "laudable" would all be adjectives that suggest a place among a top tier of competitors, but also one that (probably) follows behind the few very highest of achievers.
Joey received a notable result among the six people.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/distinguishable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/notable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/worthy
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/honorable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/laudable
The words "distinguishable", "notable", "honorable", "worthy", "admirable" and "laudable" would all be adjectives that suggest a place among a top tier of competitors, but also one that (probably) follows behind the few very highest of achievers.
Joey received a notable result among the six people.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/distinguishable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/notable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/worthy
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/honorable
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/laudable
answered Mar 1 at 9:18
user22542user22542
3,8591512
3,8591512
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f403877%2fis-there-a-word-that-can-describe-something-is-good-but-not-better-than-very-few%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Midrange, adequate, second tier? "Regional powerhouse" for college sport teams.
– user662852
Aug 2 '17 at 11:15
third-best
– Mari-Lou A
Aug 2 '17 at 11:20
1
"Top-tier" and "competitive" both have positive connotations. "Adequate" and "acceptable" are much less positive. "Respectable" is probably what I would use to give it a very slight positive spin.
– Solocutor
Jan 29 at 21:41
Midpack. C’s that get degrees.
– Rusty Core
Mar 1 at 0:35