Transformation of sentences using “too”Is “gets” the correct tense to describe a continuous process in “John gets mentored on a daily basis”?Using many / much / a lot of with *population*“If you or somebody you know” vs “If somebody you know or you”Does “would” indicate intent but not possibility?Is it “Most of the reading was done” or “Most of the reading were done”?Using too many 'to's in a sentence?Be mindful of using vs be mindful ofUsage of “to” in the mentioned sentenceHow to punctuate interpolated interjections which are sentencesUsing 'not only… but also'

What does the "ep" capability means?

Largest value of determinant

How can Zone of Truth be defeated without the caster knowing?

As an international instructor, should I openly talk about my accent?

Can someone publish a story that happened to you?

Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?

what is the sudo password for a --disabled-password user

What is the origin of the term "plane of the spirit level"?

How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?

Why is it that the natural deduction method can't test for invalidity?

Does holding a wand and speaking its command word count as V/S/M spell components?

How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?

How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?

Critique of timeline aesthetic

A ​Note ​on ​N!

Size of electromagnet needed to replicate Earth's magnetic field

Is this homebrew Wind Wave spell balanced?

How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?

What language was spoken in East Asia before Proto-Turkic?

Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?

Refer to page numbers where table is referenced

Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"

Can SQL Server create collisions in system generated constraint names?

How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?



Transformation of sentences using “too”


Is “gets” the correct tense to describe a continuous process in “John gets mentored on a daily basis”?Using many / much / a lot of with *population*“If you or somebody you know” vs “If somebody you know or you”Does “would” indicate intent but not possibility?Is it “Most of the reading was done” or “Most of the reading were done”?Using too many 'to's in a sentence?Be mindful of using vs be mindful ofUsage of “to” in the mentioned sentenceHow to punctuate interpolated interjections which are sentencesUsing 'not only… but also'






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0















An example:




Tanzil is so capable that he does not require help.



Answer: "Tanzil is too capable to require help"




On this basis transform the sentence:




Naman is so innocent that he gets easily deceived




Changing the sentence using "too", I wrote




"Naman is too innocent to not be easily deceived."




However that is wrong.
The correct answer is: "Naman is too innocent not to be easily deceived."



Please somebody clarify the above.










share|improve this question
























  • I don't really follow. Did someone tell you that the form "to not be" is incorrect, but with no explanation? Maybe he objected to the split infinitive; we prefer to put the word "to" immediately before the verb in an infinitive. This objection really has nothing to do with business of "so" and "too."

    – Chaim
    Mar 28 at 13:56











  • Yes,they didn’t offer any explanation

    – Agnay Srivastava
    Mar 29 at 2:31











  • but am I wrong in this case?

    – Agnay Srivastava
    Mar 29 at 2:32











  • I think of "right" and "wrong" constructions as questions of degree and taste. In this case I think that lots of literate and careful writers sometimes put the word "not" within the infinitive just the way you did. But personally I would make the same change that someone else seems to be advising you to make, putting "not" before "to." In my opinion it's partly a question of whether the particular words sound natural to you in one order or another.

    – Chaim
    Mar 29 at 11:27

















0















An example:




Tanzil is so capable that he does not require help.



Answer: "Tanzil is too capable to require help"




On this basis transform the sentence:




Naman is so innocent that he gets easily deceived




Changing the sentence using "too", I wrote




"Naman is too innocent to not be easily deceived."




However that is wrong.
The correct answer is: "Naman is too innocent not to be easily deceived."



Please somebody clarify the above.










share|improve this question
























  • I don't really follow. Did someone tell you that the form "to not be" is incorrect, but with no explanation? Maybe he objected to the split infinitive; we prefer to put the word "to" immediately before the verb in an infinitive. This objection really has nothing to do with business of "so" and "too."

    – Chaim
    Mar 28 at 13:56











  • Yes,they didn’t offer any explanation

    – Agnay Srivastava
    Mar 29 at 2:31











  • but am I wrong in this case?

    – Agnay Srivastava
    Mar 29 at 2:32











  • I think of "right" and "wrong" constructions as questions of degree and taste. In this case I think that lots of literate and careful writers sometimes put the word "not" within the infinitive just the way you did. But personally I would make the same change that someone else seems to be advising you to make, putting "not" before "to." In my opinion it's partly a question of whether the particular words sound natural to you in one order or another.

    – Chaim
    Mar 29 at 11:27













0












0








0








An example:




Tanzil is so capable that he does not require help.



Answer: "Tanzil is too capable to require help"




On this basis transform the sentence:




Naman is so innocent that he gets easily deceived




Changing the sentence using "too", I wrote




"Naman is too innocent to not be easily deceived."




However that is wrong.
The correct answer is: "Naman is too innocent not to be easily deceived."



Please somebody clarify the above.










share|improve this question
















An example:




Tanzil is so capable that he does not require help.



Answer: "Tanzil is too capable to require help"




On this basis transform the sentence:




Naman is so innocent that he gets easily deceived




Changing the sentence using "too", I wrote




"Naman is too innocent to not be easily deceived."




However that is wrong.
The correct answer is: "Naman is too innocent not to be easily deceived."



Please somebody clarify the above.







grammar






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 28 at 12:55









Bella Swan

4188




4188










asked Mar 28 at 11:42









Agnay SrivastavaAgnay Srivastava

1




1












  • I don't really follow. Did someone tell you that the form "to not be" is incorrect, but with no explanation? Maybe he objected to the split infinitive; we prefer to put the word "to" immediately before the verb in an infinitive. This objection really has nothing to do with business of "so" and "too."

    – Chaim
    Mar 28 at 13:56











  • Yes,they didn’t offer any explanation

    – Agnay Srivastava
    Mar 29 at 2:31











  • but am I wrong in this case?

    – Agnay Srivastava
    Mar 29 at 2:32











  • I think of "right" and "wrong" constructions as questions of degree and taste. In this case I think that lots of literate and careful writers sometimes put the word "not" within the infinitive just the way you did. But personally I would make the same change that someone else seems to be advising you to make, putting "not" before "to." In my opinion it's partly a question of whether the particular words sound natural to you in one order or another.

    – Chaim
    Mar 29 at 11:27

















  • I don't really follow. Did someone tell you that the form "to not be" is incorrect, but with no explanation? Maybe he objected to the split infinitive; we prefer to put the word "to" immediately before the verb in an infinitive. This objection really has nothing to do with business of "so" and "too."

    – Chaim
    Mar 28 at 13:56











  • Yes,they didn’t offer any explanation

    – Agnay Srivastava
    Mar 29 at 2:31











  • but am I wrong in this case?

    – Agnay Srivastava
    Mar 29 at 2:32











  • I think of "right" and "wrong" constructions as questions of degree and taste. In this case I think that lots of literate and careful writers sometimes put the word "not" within the infinitive just the way you did. But personally I would make the same change that someone else seems to be advising you to make, putting "not" before "to." In my opinion it's partly a question of whether the particular words sound natural to you in one order or another.

    – Chaim
    Mar 29 at 11:27
















I don't really follow. Did someone tell you that the form "to not be" is incorrect, but with no explanation? Maybe he objected to the split infinitive; we prefer to put the word "to" immediately before the verb in an infinitive. This objection really has nothing to do with business of "so" and "too."

– Chaim
Mar 28 at 13:56





I don't really follow. Did someone tell you that the form "to not be" is incorrect, but with no explanation? Maybe he objected to the split infinitive; we prefer to put the word "to" immediately before the verb in an infinitive. This objection really has nothing to do with business of "so" and "too."

– Chaim
Mar 28 at 13:56













Yes,they didn’t offer any explanation

– Agnay Srivastava
Mar 29 at 2:31





Yes,they didn’t offer any explanation

– Agnay Srivastava
Mar 29 at 2:31













but am I wrong in this case?

– Agnay Srivastava
Mar 29 at 2:32





but am I wrong in this case?

– Agnay Srivastava
Mar 29 at 2:32













I think of "right" and "wrong" constructions as questions of degree and taste. In this case I think that lots of literate and careful writers sometimes put the word "not" within the infinitive just the way you did. But personally I would make the same change that someone else seems to be advising you to make, putting "not" before "to." In my opinion it's partly a question of whether the particular words sound natural to you in one order or another.

– Chaim
Mar 29 at 11:27





I think of "right" and "wrong" constructions as questions of degree and taste. In this case I think that lots of literate and careful writers sometimes put the word "not" within the infinitive just the way you did. But personally I would make the same change that someone else seems to be advising you to make, putting "not" before "to." In my opinion it's partly a question of whether the particular words sound natural to you in one order or another.

– Chaim
Mar 29 at 11:27










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491704%2ftransformation-of-sentences-using-too%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491704%2ftransformation-of-sentences-using-too%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029