When introducing an initialism for the first time in a paper, but the noun is possessive, do I make the initialism possessive as well?Possessive for a third person and a first personCan a word that sounds the same as the way it is spelt be an initialism and an acronym?A noun adjunct / the possessive case“VPN Networks” vs. “VPNs”Graphotactics of possessive: the true reason for the apostropheWhen should a colon be used in the title of a manuscript?When the first word of an initialism is the same as the initialismApsotrophe for plural possessive noun. E.g. Company NameAdding the 'the' article for proper noun and abbreviation?Drop possessive apostrophe for noun ending in s/double s

How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?

Can a barbarian keep raging if she shoves an enemy on her turn?

Could the terminal length of components like resistors be reduced?

Is the claim "Employers won't employ people with no 'social media presence'" realistic?

Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?

Is there an implicit type promotion in "float = float - float"?

Critique of timeline aesthetic

How to not starve gigantic beasts

What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?

All ASCII characters with a given bit count

As an international instructor, should I openly talk about my accent?

"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?

Big O /Right or wrong?

Don’t seats that recline flat defeat the purpose of having seatbelts?

Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?

I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?

Authenticating an internal API with Flask

Multiple options vs single option UI

Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?

What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?

Philosophical question on logistic regression: why isn't the optimal threshold value trained?

Check if a string is entirely made of the same substring

Determine the application client is using to connect



When introducing an initialism for the first time in a paper, but the noun is possessive, do I make the initialism possessive as well?


Possessive for a third person and a first personCan a word that sounds the same as the way it is spelt be an initialism and an acronym?A noun adjunct / the possessive case“VPN Networks” vs. “VPNs”Graphotactics of possessive: the true reason for the apostropheWhen should a colon be used in the title of a manuscript?When the first word of an initialism is the same as the initialismApsotrophe for plural possessive noun. E.g. Company NameAdding the 'the' article for proper noun and abbreviation?Drop possessive apostrophe for noun ending in s/double s






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0















E.G., "Mobile network operator's (MNO's) networks are overloaded."



Or



"Mobile network operator's (MNO) networks are overloaded."










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 18 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • What style guide does your field use? (APA, MLA, Chicago, AMA, IEEE, etc.) Does that style guide have anything to say on the subject? If you would clarify your question a bit to highlight context, you may get a better answer.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    Mar 26 at 13:28







  • 1





    Do yourself and your readers a favour. Rephrase to The networks of mobile network operators (MNOs) are overloaded. That way you won't need either of those clumsy possessive apostrophes.

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 26 at 13:43







  • 1





    Incorrect use of apostrophe. MNOs (plural), not MNO’s, which would be possessive. Get that right first!

    – David
    Mar 26 at 17:47











  • I've seen it both ways but, in my opinion for whatever it's worth, omitting the possessive looks cleaner.

    – Anton Sherwood
    Mar 27 at 5:16

















0















E.G., "Mobile network operator's (MNO's) networks are overloaded."



Or



"Mobile network operator's (MNO) networks are overloaded."










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 18 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • What style guide does your field use? (APA, MLA, Chicago, AMA, IEEE, etc.) Does that style guide have anything to say on the subject? If you would clarify your question a bit to highlight context, you may get a better answer.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    Mar 26 at 13:28







  • 1





    Do yourself and your readers a favour. Rephrase to The networks of mobile network operators (MNOs) are overloaded. That way you won't need either of those clumsy possessive apostrophes.

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 26 at 13:43







  • 1





    Incorrect use of apostrophe. MNOs (plural), not MNO’s, which would be possessive. Get that right first!

    – David
    Mar 26 at 17:47











  • I've seen it both ways but, in my opinion for whatever it's worth, omitting the possessive looks cleaner.

    – Anton Sherwood
    Mar 27 at 5:16













0












0








0








E.G., "Mobile network operator's (MNO's) networks are overloaded."



Or



"Mobile network operator's (MNO) networks are overloaded."










share|improve this question














E.G., "Mobile network operator's (MNO's) networks are overloaded."



Or



"Mobile network operator's (MNO) networks are overloaded."







writing-style possessives acronyms initialisms formatting






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 26 at 13:22









BradyBrady

6




6





bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 18 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 18 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.














  • What style guide does your field use? (APA, MLA, Chicago, AMA, IEEE, etc.) Does that style guide have anything to say on the subject? If you would clarify your question a bit to highlight context, you may get a better answer.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    Mar 26 at 13:28







  • 1





    Do yourself and your readers a favour. Rephrase to The networks of mobile network operators (MNOs) are overloaded. That way you won't need either of those clumsy possessive apostrophes.

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 26 at 13:43







  • 1





    Incorrect use of apostrophe. MNOs (plural), not MNO’s, which would be possessive. Get that right first!

    – David
    Mar 26 at 17:47











  • I've seen it both ways but, in my opinion for whatever it's worth, omitting the possessive looks cleaner.

    – Anton Sherwood
    Mar 27 at 5:16

















  • What style guide does your field use? (APA, MLA, Chicago, AMA, IEEE, etc.) Does that style guide have anything to say on the subject? If you would clarify your question a bit to highlight context, you may get a better answer.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    Mar 26 at 13:28







  • 1





    Do yourself and your readers a favour. Rephrase to The networks of mobile network operators (MNOs) are overloaded. That way you won't need either of those clumsy possessive apostrophes.

    – FumbleFingers
    Mar 26 at 13:43







  • 1





    Incorrect use of apostrophe. MNOs (plural), not MNO’s, which would be possessive. Get that right first!

    – David
    Mar 26 at 17:47











  • I've seen it both ways but, in my opinion for whatever it's worth, omitting the possessive looks cleaner.

    – Anton Sherwood
    Mar 27 at 5:16
















What style guide does your field use? (APA, MLA, Chicago, AMA, IEEE, etc.) Does that style guide have anything to say on the subject? If you would clarify your question a bit to highlight context, you may get a better answer.

– TaliesinMerlin
Mar 26 at 13:28






What style guide does your field use? (APA, MLA, Chicago, AMA, IEEE, etc.) Does that style guide have anything to say on the subject? If you would clarify your question a bit to highlight context, you may get a better answer.

– TaliesinMerlin
Mar 26 at 13:28





1




1





Do yourself and your readers a favour. Rephrase to The networks of mobile network operators (MNOs) are overloaded. That way you won't need either of those clumsy possessive apostrophes.

– FumbleFingers
Mar 26 at 13:43






Do yourself and your readers a favour. Rephrase to The networks of mobile network operators (MNOs) are overloaded. That way you won't need either of those clumsy possessive apostrophes.

– FumbleFingers
Mar 26 at 13:43





1




1





Incorrect use of apostrophe. MNOs (plural), not MNO’s, which would be possessive. Get that right first!

– David
Mar 26 at 17:47





Incorrect use of apostrophe. MNOs (plural), not MNO’s, which would be possessive. Get that right first!

– David
Mar 26 at 17:47













I've seen it both ways but, in my opinion for whatever it's worth, omitting the possessive looks cleaner.

– Anton Sherwood
Mar 27 at 5:16





I've seen it both ways but, in my opinion for whatever it's worth, omitting the possessive looks cleaner.

– Anton Sherwood
Mar 27 at 5:16










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I would certainly leave the possessive out of the parenthetical. It is clearly understandable with the possessive used with the words. (MNO) is fine.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491413%2fwhen-introducing-an-initialism-for-the-first-time-in-a-paper-but-the-noun-is-po%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    I would certainly leave the possessive out of the parenthetical. It is clearly understandable with the possessive used with the words. (MNO) is fine.






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      I would certainly leave the possessive out of the parenthetical. It is clearly understandable with the possessive used with the words. (MNO) is fine.






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        I would certainly leave the possessive out of the parenthetical. It is clearly understandable with the possessive used with the words. (MNO) is fine.






        share|improve this answer













        I would certainly leave the possessive out of the parenthetical. It is clearly understandable with the possessive used with the words. (MNO) is fine.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 26 at 17:45









        ElliotElliot

        401




        401



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491413%2fwhen-introducing-an-initialism-for-the-first-time-in-a-paper-but-the-noun-is-po%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

            Modern approach to radio buttons

            A word for worn pool table felt