Why do we use the plural of movies in this phrase “We went to the movies last night.”?Clauses wrong usagesDistinction between singular “like” and plural “likes”'Team' doesn't or don't'?Singular vs. plural in “interest rates and investment”Plural should be used on decimal quantities?Why did they use article in the phrase “a workers' cooperative”When exactly do we have to use the distributive plural?“Three eggs is plenty” Vs. “a number of boys were absent”?Singular vs. plural in the object of this sentenceDoes this noun phrase (a variable name) take a singular or plural verb?

What word means "to make something obsolete"?

Feels like I am getting dragged into office politics

Pigeonhole Principle Problem

Why do freehub and cassette have only one position that matches?

Why does my Macbook overheat and use so much CPU and energy when on YouTube?

When and why did journal article titles become descriptive, rather than creatively allusive?

Can commander tax be proliferated?

How do I tell my manager that his code review comment is wrong?

Why do money exchangers give different rates to different bills

Is thermodynamics only applicable to systems in equilibrium?

How did Captain America use this power?

You look catfish vs You look like a catfish?

What are the spoon bit of a spoon and fork bit of a fork called?

Was Unix ever a single-user OS?

How could a planet have most of its water in the atmosphere?

Airbnb - host wants to reduce rooms, can we get refund?

Can I use 1000v rectifier diodes instead of 600v rectifier diodes?

Why is the SNP putting so much emphasis on currency plans?

Accidentally deleted the "/usr/share" folder

Hang 20lb projector screen on Hardieplank

How to scale a verbatim environment on a minipage?

How to creep the reader out with what seems like a normal person?

How can I close a gap between my fence and my neighbor's that's on his side of the property line?

How to assert on pagereference where the endpoint of pagereference is predefined



Why do we use the plural of movies in this phrase “We went to the movies last night.”?


Clauses wrong usagesDistinction between singular “like” and plural “likes”'Team' doesn't or don't'?Singular vs. plural in “interest rates and investment”Plural should be used on decimal quantities?Why did they use article in the phrase “a workers' cooperative”When exactly do we have to use the distributive plural?“Three eggs is plenty” Vs. “a number of boys were absent”?Singular vs. plural in the object of this sentenceDoes this noun phrase (a variable name) take a singular or plural verb?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








14















I found this sentence:




We went to the movies last night.




at the following URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/movies



Why do they use the plural "movies", why not use the singular "movie"?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Related/Duplicate question on English SE

    – BruceWayne
    Mar 28 at 21:34

















14















I found this sentence:




We went to the movies last night.




at the following URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/movies



Why do they use the plural "movies", why not use the singular "movie"?










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Related/Duplicate question on English SE

    – BruceWayne
    Mar 28 at 21:34













14












14








14


2






I found this sentence:




We went to the movies last night.




at the following URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/movies



Why do they use the plural "movies", why not use the singular "movie"?










share|improve this question
















I found this sentence:




We went to the movies last night.




at the following URL: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/movies



Why do they use the plural "movies", why not use the singular "movie"?







american-english singular-vs-plural






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 29 at 10:33









Draken

1174




1174










asked Mar 28 at 19:21









b2okb2ok

378315




378315







  • 2





    Related/Duplicate question on English SE

    – BruceWayne
    Mar 28 at 21:34












  • 2





    Related/Duplicate question on English SE

    – BruceWayne
    Mar 28 at 21:34







2




2





Related/Duplicate question on English SE

– BruceWayne
Mar 28 at 21:34





Related/Duplicate question on English SE

– BruceWayne
Mar 28 at 21:34










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















20














In the very early days, movies were very short (about 10-15 minutes), so people watched several movies in a row. Even when feature films were developed, there was typically a newsreel, a short and the feature.



Also, they were originally called 'moving pictures', which quite naturally became 'movies'. 'A movie' came slightly later. (I think people referred to 'a film' before they referred to 'a movie'.)






share|improve this answer




















  • 5





    Do you have a source for that? Just curious, as it's not the reason given in the Answer in this identical question which uses MacMillan as a source.

    – BruceWayne
    Mar 28 at 21:34







  • 2





    @BruceWayne From my own knowledge of history and language, I believe this answer to be entirely accurate, but you're right- sources are always appreciated. It should be noted, however, your linked answer essentially says "the dictionary definition is thus" whereas this answer says "the reason the word means this is thus". The two are complimentary, not contradictory. The MacMillian definition for "movie" even references the relation to "moving pictures' though it stops short of claiming it to be a contraction of the phrase.

    – jmbpiano
    Mar 29 at 6:12












  • The OED has a citation for "movie" from 1913, which is sufficiently close to the earliest for "movies" (1909) that I'm not sure we can really say that the singular came later. At that time, the word seems to have been always written in quotes, suggesting that it was felt to be a very informal term that might be common in spoken English but was rarely written down, again making it hard to determine the relative age.

    – David Richerby
    Mar 29 at 15:23







  • 1





    The first section in particular feels like a meaning added in retrospect. It definitely needs to be referenced if it's being stated as a true factor in the etymology. If no reference can be found, it may be best to move it second and make it clear that it's an interesting additional bit of trivia. There is currently no evidence that it influenced the plurality of the term "Movies".

    – Bilkokuya
    Mar 29 at 16:07



















19














Because, as that definition explained, "movies" in that context refers to the movie theater, which typically has several showings for a movie. If you want to refer to the showing you specifically attended, you would say "we went to a movie last night."






share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    Could you include a reference for this please?

    – Bilkokuya
    Mar 29 at 16:11


















16















Do you want to go to the movies tonight?



Do you want to go to the cinema tonight?




Both the movies (AmE) or the cinema (BrE) refer to a place where you can watch a movie (AmE) or a film (BrE). It is usually a movie theater (AmE) or a cinema (BrE).




Would you like to go and see a film tonight?



I thought we might get something to eat and then go to see a movie.







share|improve this answer




















  • 7





    "The cinema" and "a film" are certainly valid in AmE, they're just a bit formal for casual conversation.

    – Kevin
    Mar 29 at 1:15






  • 3





    You can also say "the pictures" in BrE although it may sound a bit old-fashioned.

    – Richard
    Mar 29 at 12:50






  • 5





    @Kevin Ya, this answer is a bit weird in how hard of a distinction it makes between AmE and BrE. AmE speakers use "cinema" too. One of the largest theater chains is called Regal Cinemas. And "film" is extremely common to hear in AmE. It's interchangeable with "movie", although a bit less common. It's not like they call it "movie school".

    – only_pro
    Mar 29 at 15:07












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202874%2fwhy-do-we-use-the-plural-of-movies-in-this-phrase-we-went-to-the-movies-last-ni%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









20














In the very early days, movies were very short (about 10-15 minutes), so people watched several movies in a row. Even when feature films were developed, there was typically a newsreel, a short and the feature.



Also, they were originally called 'moving pictures', which quite naturally became 'movies'. 'A movie' came slightly later. (I think people referred to 'a film' before they referred to 'a movie'.)






share|improve this answer




















  • 5





    Do you have a source for that? Just curious, as it's not the reason given in the Answer in this identical question which uses MacMillan as a source.

    – BruceWayne
    Mar 28 at 21:34







  • 2





    @BruceWayne From my own knowledge of history and language, I believe this answer to be entirely accurate, but you're right- sources are always appreciated. It should be noted, however, your linked answer essentially says "the dictionary definition is thus" whereas this answer says "the reason the word means this is thus". The two are complimentary, not contradictory. The MacMillian definition for "movie" even references the relation to "moving pictures' though it stops short of claiming it to be a contraction of the phrase.

    – jmbpiano
    Mar 29 at 6:12












  • The OED has a citation for "movie" from 1913, which is sufficiently close to the earliest for "movies" (1909) that I'm not sure we can really say that the singular came later. At that time, the word seems to have been always written in quotes, suggesting that it was felt to be a very informal term that might be common in spoken English but was rarely written down, again making it hard to determine the relative age.

    – David Richerby
    Mar 29 at 15:23







  • 1





    The first section in particular feels like a meaning added in retrospect. It definitely needs to be referenced if it's being stated as a true factor in the etymology. If no reference can be found, it may be best to move it second and make it clear that it's an interesting additional bit of trivia. There is currently no evidence that it influenced the plurality of the term "Movies".

    – Bilkokuya
    Mar 29 at 16:07
















20














In the very early days, movies were very short (about 10-15 minutes), so people watched several movies in a row. Even when feature films were developed, there was typically a newsreel, a short and the feature.



Also, they were originally called 'moving pictures', which quite naturally became 'movies'. 'A movie' came slightly later. (I think people referred to 'a film' before they referred to 'a movie'.)






share|improve this answer




















  • 5





    Do you have a source for that? Just curious, as it's not the reason given in the Answer in this identical question which uses MacMillan as a source.

    – BruceWayne
    Mar 28 at 21:34







  • 2





    @BruceWayne From my own knowledge of history and language, I believe this answer to be entirely accurate, but you're right- sources are always appreciated. It should be noted, however, your linked answer essentially says "the dictionary definition is thus" whereas this answer says "the reason the word means this is thus". The two are complimentary, not contradictory. The MacMillian definition for "movie" even references the relation to "moving pictures' though it stops short of claiming it to be a contraction of the phrase.

    – jmbpiano
    Mar 29 at 6:12












  • The OED has a citation for "movie" from 1913, which is sufficiently close to the earliest for "movies" (1909) that I'm not sure we can really say that the singular came later. At that time, the word seems to have been always written in quotes, suggesting that it was felt to be a very informal term that might be common in spoken English but was rarely written down, again making it hard to determine the relative age.

    – David Richerby
    Mar 29 at 15:23







  • 1





    The first section in particular feels like a meaning added in retrospect. It definitely needs to be referenced if it's being stated as a true factor in the etymology. If no reference can be found, it may be best to move it second and make it clear that it's an interesting additional bit of trivia. There is currently no evidence that it influenced the plurality of the term "Movies".

    – Bilkokuya
    Mar 29 at 16:07














20












20








20







In the very early days, movies were very short (about 10-15 minutes), so people watched several movies in a row. Even when feature films were developed, there was typically a newsreel, a short and the feature.



Also, they were originally called 'moving pictures', which quite naturally became 'movies'. 'A movie' came slightly later. (I think people referred to 'a film' before they referred to 'a movie'.)






share|improve this answer















In the very early days, movies were very short (about 10-15 minutes), so people watched several movies in a row. Even when feature films were developed, there was typically a newsreel, a short and the feature.



Also, they were originally called 'moving pictures', which quite naturally became 'movies'. 'A movie' came slightly later. (I think people referred to 'a film' before they referred to 'a movie'.)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 28 at 20:16

























answered Mar 28 at 20:00









SydneySydney

5,1122816




5,1122816







  • 5





    Do you have a source for that? Just curious, as it's not the reason given in the Answer in this identical question which uses MacMillan as a source.

    – BruceWayne
    Mar 28 at 21:34







  • 2





    @BruceWayne From my own knowledge of history and language, I believe this answer to be entirely accurate, but you're right- sources are always appreciated. It should be noted, however, your linked answer essentially says "the dictionary definition is thus" whereas this answer says "the reason the word means this is thus". The two are complimentary, not contradictory. The MacMillian definition for "movie" even references the relation to "moving pictures' though it stops short of claiming it to be a contraction of the phrase.

    – jmbpiano
    Mar 29 at 6:12












  • The OED has a citation for "movie" from 1913, which is sufficiently close to the earliest for "movies" (1909) that I'm not sure we can really say that the singular came later. At that time, the word seems to have been always written in quotes, suggesting that it was felt to be a very informal term that might be common in spoken English but was rarely written down, again making it hard to determine the relative age.

    – David Richerby
    Mar 29 at 15:23







  • 1





    The first section in particular feels like a meaning added in retrospect. It definitely needs to be referenced if it's being stated as a true factor in the etymology. If no reference can be found, it may be best to move it second and make it clear that it's an interesting additional bit of trivia. There is currently no evidence that it influenced the plurality of the term "Movies".

    – Bilkokuya
    Mar 29 at 16:07













  • 5





    Do you have a source for that? Just curious, as it's not the reason given in the Answer in this identical question which uses MacMillan as a source.

    – BruceWayne
    Mar 28 at 21:34







  • 2





    @BruceWayne From my own knowledge of history and language, I believe this answer to be entirely accurate, but you're right- sources are always appreciated. It should be noted, however, your linked answer essentially says "the dictionary definition is thus" whereas this answer says "the reason the word means this is thus". The two are complimentary, not contradictory. The MacMillian definition for "movie" even references the relation to "moving pictures' though it stops short of claiming it to be a contraction of the phrase.

    – jmbpiano
    Mar 29 at 6:12












  • The OED has a citation for "movie" from 1913, which is sufficiently close to the earliest for "movies" (1909) that I'm not sure we can really say that the singular came later. At that time, the word seems to have been always written in quotes, suggesting that it was felt to be a very informal term that might be common in spoken English but was rarely written down, again making it hard to determine the relative age.

    – David Richerby
    Mar 29 at 15:23







  • 1





    The first section in particular feels like a meaning added in retrospect. It definitely needs to be referenced if it's being stated as a true factor in the etymology. If no reference can be found, it may be best to move it second and make it clear that it's an interesting additional bit of trivia. There is currently no evidence that it influenced the plurality of the term "Movies".

    – Bilkokuya
    Mar 29 at 16:07








5




5





Do you have a source for that? Just curious, as it's not the reason given in the Answer in this identical question which uses MacMillan as a source.

– BruceWayne
Mar 28 at 21:34






Do you have a source for that? Just curious, as it's not the reason given in the Answer in this identical question which uses MacMillan as a source.

– BruceWayne
Mar 28 at 21:34





2




2





@BruceWayne From my own knowledge of history and language, I believe this answer to be entirely accurate, but you're right- sources are always appreciated. It should be noted, however, your linked answer essentially says "the dictionary definition is thus" whereas this answer says "the reason the word means this is thus". The two are complimentary, not contradictory. The MacMillian definition for "movie" even references the relation to "moving pictures' though it stops short of claiming it to be a contraction of the phrase.

– jmbpiano
Mar 29 at 6:12






@BruceWayne From my own knowledge of history and language, I believe this answer to be entirely accurate, but you're right- sources are always appreciated. It should be noted, however, your linked answer essentially says "the dictionary definition is thus" whereas this answer says "the reason the word means this is thus". The two are complimentary, not contradictory. The MacMillian definition for "movie" even references the relation to "moving pictures' though it stops short of claiming it to be a contraction of the phrase.

– jmbpiano
Mar 29 at 6:12














The OED has a citation for "movie" from 1913, which is sufficiently close to the earliest for "movies" (1909) that I'm not sure we can really say that the singular came later. At that time, the word seems to have been always written in quotes, suggesting that it was felt to be a very informal term that might be common in spoken English but was rarely written down, again making it hard to determine the relative age.

– David Richerby
Mar 29 at 15:23






The OED has a citation for "movie" from 1913, which is sufficiently close to the earliest for "movies" (1909) that I'm not sure we can really say that the singular came later. At that time, the word seems to have been always written in quotes, suggesting that it was felt to be a very informal term that might be common in spoken English but was rarely written down, again making it hard to determine the relative age.

– David Richerby
Mar 29 at 15:23





1




1





The first section in particular feels like a meaning added in retrospect. It definitely needs to be referenced if it's being stated as a true factor in the etymology. If no reference can be found, it may be best to move it second and make it clear that it's an interesting additional bit of trivia. There is currently no evidence that it influenced the plurality of the term "Movies".

– Bilkokuya
Mar 29 at 16:07






The first section in particular feels like a meaning added in retrospect. It definitely needs to be referenced if it's being stated as a true factor in the etymology. If no reference can be found, it may be best to move it second and make it clear that it's an interesting additional bit of trivia. There is currently no evidence that it influenced the plurality of the term "Movies".

– Bilkokuya
Mar 29 at 16:07














19














Because, as that definition explained, "movies" in that context refers to the movie theater, which typically has several showings for a movie. If you want to refer to the showing you specifically attended, you would say "we went to a movie last night."






share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    Could you include a reference for this please?

    – Bilkokuya
    Mar 29 at 16:11















19














Because, as that definition explained, "movies" in that context refers to the movie theater, which typically has several showings for a movie. If you want to refer to the showing you specifically attended, you would say "we went to a movie last night."






share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    Could you include a reference for this please?

    – Bilkokuya
    Mar 29 at 16:11













19












19








19







Because, as that definition explained, "movies" in that context refers to the movie theater, which typically has several showings for a movie. If you want to refer to the showing you specifically attended, you would say "we went to a movie last night."






share|improve this answer













Because, as that definition explained, "movies" in that context refers to the movie theater, which typically has several showings for a movie. If you want to refer to the showing you specifically attended, you would say "we went to a movie last night."







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 28 at 19:47









pboss3010pboss3010

95926




95926







  • 3





    Could you include a reference for this please?

    – Bilkokuya
    Mar 29 at 16:11












  • 3





    Could you include a reference for this please?

    – Bilkokuya
    Mar 29 at 16:11







3




3





Could you include a reference for this please?

– Bilkokuya
Mar 29 at 16:11





Could you include a reference for this please?

– Bilkokuya
Mar 29 at 16:11











16















Do you want to go to the movies tonight?



Do you want to go to the cinema tonight?




Both the movies (AmE) or the cinema (BrE) refer to a place where you can watch a movie (AmE) or a film (BrE). It is usually a movie theater (AmE) or a cinema (BrE).




Would you like to go and see a film tonight?



I thought we might get something to eat and then go to see a movie.







share|improve this answer




















  • 7





    "The cinema" and "a film" are certainly valid in AmE, they're just a bit formal for casual conversation.

    – Kevin
    Mar 29 at 1:15






  • 3





    You can also say "the pictures" in BrE although it may sound a bit old-fashioned.

    – Richard
    Mar 29 at 12:50






  • 5





    @Kevin Ya, this answer is a bit weird in how hard of a distinction it makes between AmE and BrE. AmE speakers use "cinema" too. One of the largest theater chains is called Regal Cinemas. And "film" is extremely common to hear in AmE. It's interchangeable with "movie", although a bit less common. It's not like they call it "movie school".

    – only_pro
    Mar 29 at 15:07
















16















Do you want to go to the movies tonight?



Do you want to go to the cinema tonight?




Both the movies (AmE) or the cinema (BrE) refer to a place where you can watch a movie (AmE) or a film (BrE). It is usually a movie theater (AmE) or a cinema (BrE).




Would you like to go and see a film tonight?



I thought we might get something to eat and then go to see a movie.







share|improve this answer




















  • 7





    "The cinema" and "a film" are certainly valid in AmE, they're just a bit formal for casual conversation.

    – Kevin
    Mar 29 at 1:15






  • 3





    You can also say "the pictures" in BrE although it may sound a bit old-fashioned.

    – Richard
    Mar 29 at 12:50






  • 5





    @Kevin Ya, this answer is a bit weird in how hard of a distinction it makes between AmE and BrE. AmE speakers use "cinema" too. One of the largest theater chains is called Regal Cinemas. And "film" is extremely common to hear in AmE. It's interchangeable with "movie", although a bit less common. It's not like they call it "movie school".

    – only_pro
    Mar 29 at 15:07














16












16








16








Do you want to go to the movies tonight?



Do you want to go to the cinema tonight?




Both the movies (AmE) or the cinema (BrE) refer to a place where you can watch a movie (AmE) or a film (BrE). It is usually a movie theater (AmE) or a cinema (BrE).




Would you like to go and see a film tonight?



I thought we might get something to eat and then go to see a movie.







share|improve this answer
















Do you want to go to the movies tonight?



Do you want to go to the cinema tonight?




Both the movies (AmE) or the cinema (BrE) refer to a place where you can watch a movie (AmE) or a film (BrE). It is usually a movie theater (AmE) or a cinema (BrE).




Would you like to go and see a film tonight?



I thought we might get something to eat and then go to see a movie.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 28 at 20:00

























answered Mar 28 at 19:55









Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

2,4691829




2,4691829







  • 7





    "The cinema" and "a film" are certainly valid in AmE, they're just a bit formal for casual conversation.

    – Kevin
    Mar 29 at 1:15






  • 3





    You can also say "the pictures" in BrE although it may sound a bit old-fashioned.

    – Richard
    Mar 29 at 12:50






  • 5





    @Kevin Ya, this answer is a bit weird in how hard of a distinction it makes between AmE and BrE. AmE speakers use "cinema" too. One of the largest theater chains is called Regal Cinemas. And "film" is extremely common to hear in AmE. It's interchangeable with "movie", although a bit less common. It's not like they call it "movie school".

    – only_pro
    Mar 29 at 15:07













  • 7





    "The cinema" and "a film" are certainly valid in AmE, they're just a bit formal for casual conversation.

    – Kevin
    Mar 29 at 1:15






  • 3





    You can also say "the pictures" in BrE although it may sound a bit old-fashioned.

    – Richard
    Mar 29 at 12:50






  • 5





    @Kevin Ya, this answer is a bit weird in how hard of a distinction it makes between AmE and BrE. AmE speakers use "cinema" too. One of the largest theater chains is called Regal Cinemas. And "film" is extremely common to hear in AmE. It's interchangeable with "movie", although a bit less common. It's not like they call it "movie school".

    – only_pro
    Mar 29 at 15:07








7




7





"The cinema" and "a film" are certainly valid in AmE, they're just a bit formal for casual conversation.

– Kevin
Mar 29 at 1:15





"The cinema" and "a film" are certainly valid in AmE, they're just a bit formal for casual conversation.

– Kevin
Mar 29 at 1:15




3




3





You can also say "the pictures" in BrE although it may sound a bit old-fashioned.

– Richard
Mar 29 at 12:50





You can also say "the pictures" in BrE although it may sound a bit old-fashioned.

– Richard
Mar 29 at 12:50




5




5





@Kevin Ya, this answer is a bit weird in how hard of a distinction it makes between AmE and BrE. AmE speakers use "cinema" too. One of the largest theater chains is called Regal Cinemas. And "film" is extremely common to hear in AmE. It's interchangeable with "movie", although a bit less common. It's not like they call it "movie school".

– only_pro
Mar 29 at 15:07






@Kevin Ya, this answer is a bit weird in how hard of a distinction it makes between AmE and BrE. AmE speakers use "cinema" too. One of the largest theater chains is called Regal Cinemas. And "film" is extremely common to hear in AmE. It's interchangeable with "movie", although a bit less common. It's not like they call it "movie school".

– only_pro
Mar 29 at 15:07


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202874%2fwhy-do-we-use-the-plural-of-movies-in-this-phrase-we-went-to-the-movies-last-ni%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029