Can someone explain this formula for calculating Manhattan distance?Minimizing the maximum Manhattan distance

Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion?

Prove that a definite integral is an infinite sum

How can I get people to remember my character's gender?

How do I calculate how many of an item I'll have in this inventory system?

How to pass hash as password to ssh server

Find magical solution to magical equation

Correct way of drawing empty, half-filled and fully filled circles?

Definition of conditional probability and a problem.

Snap victim memorial reference in Avengers: Endgame

3D Volume in TIKZ

Is there a word that describes the unjustified use of a more complex word?

How can internet speed be 10 times slower without a router than when using a router?

A factorization game

Manager is threatening to grade me poorly if I don't complete the project

Outlining A Novel - How do you make it less of a slog?

Why did the Apollo 13 crew extend the LM landing gear?

Extra space in cells when using token lists to build tabular content

Can my 2 children, aged 10 and 12, who are US citizens, travel to the USA on expired American passports?

Gladys unchained

Python 3 - simple temperature program

Are there terms in German for different skull shapes?

Should I mention being denied entry to UK due to a confusion in my Visa and Ticket bookings?

Should I simplify my writing in a foreign country?

How should I tell my manager I'm not paying for an optional after work event I'm not going to?



Can someone explain this formula for calculating Manhattan distance?


Minimizing the maximum Manhattan distance













6












$begingroup$


This is from a Kickstart problem:




Note: The Manhattan distance between two squares (r1,c1) and (r2,c2)
is defined as |r1 - r2| + |c1 - c2|, where |*| operator denotes the
absolute value.




Then in the analysis:




Note that the manhattan distance has an equivalent formula:



dist((x1, y1), (x2, y2)) = max(abs(x1 + y1 - (x2 + y2)), abs(x1 - y1 - (x2 - y2)))


This formula is based on the fact that for any point, the set of
points within a manhattan distance of K form a square rotated by 45
degrees. The benefit of this formula is that if we fix (x2, y2), the
distance will be maximized when x1 + y1 and x1 - y1 are either
maximized or minimized.




Could someone explain in more details how this formula can be derived?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why don't you try drawing this square, and determine what these distances represent? Hint: try to determine the coordinates of the corners of this square.
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 13:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DavidRicherby The benefit appears to be that for the specific use-case of determining whether there exists a point with distance at most $k$ to some set $S$, it seems we can do this more efficiently, as we only have to find the maximum and minimum of the points in $S$ according to $x_1+y_1$ and $x_1-y_1$ once and then can query for each point in constant time. Do you think there is an easier way to get a constant query time here?
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 13:44











  • $begingroup$
    I suppose that you could also directly look at the corners of the smallest enclosing 45 degree turned square of these points, and then you end up with basically the same values as the maxima and minima in your dataset. So, in a way, I see that changing the Manhattan distance itself could be a rather complicated way of achieving this.
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 13:51
















6












$begingroup$


This is from a Kickstart problem:




Note: The Manhattan distance between two squares (r1,c1) and (r2,c2)
is defined as |r1 - r2| + |c1 - c2|, where |*| operator denotes the
absolute value.




Then in the analysis:




Note that the manhattan distance has an equivalent formula:



dist((x1, y1), (x2, y2)) = max(abs(x1 + y1 - (x2 + y2)), abs(x1 - y1 - (x2 - y2)))


This formula is based on the fact that for any point, the set of
points within a manhattan distance of K form a square rotated by 45
degrees. The benefit of this formula is that if we fix (x2, y2), the
distance will be maximized when x1 + y1 and x1 - y1 are either
maximized or minimized.




Could someone explain in more details how this formula can be derived?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why don't you try drawing this square, and determine what these distances represent? Hint: try to determine the coordinates of the corners of this square.
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 13:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DavidRicherby The benefit appears to be that for the specific use-case of determining whether there exists a point with distance at most $k$ to some set $S$, it seems we can do this more efficiently, as we only have to find the maximum and minimum of the points in $S$ according to $x_1+y_1$ and $x_1-y_1$ once and then can query for each point in constant time. Do you think there is an easier way to get a constant query time here?
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 13:44











  • $begingroup$
    I suppose that you could also directly look at the corners of the smallest enclosing 45 degree turned square of these points, and then you end up with basically the same values as the maxima and minima in your dataset. So, in a way, I see that changing the Manhattan distance itself could be a rather complicated way of achieving this.
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 13:51














6












6








6





$begingroup$


This is from a Kickstart problem:




Note: The Manhattan distance between two squares (r1,c1) and (r2,c2)
is defined as |r1 - r2| + |c1 - c2|, where |*| operator denotes the
absolute value.




Then in the analysis:




Note that the manhattan distance has an equivalent formula:



dist((x1, y1), (x2, y2)) = max(abs(x1 + y1 - (x2 + y2)), abs(x1 - y1 - (x2 - y2)))


This formula is based on the fact that for any point, the set of
points within a manhattan distance of K form a square rotated by 45
degrees. The benefit of this formula is that if we fix (x2, y2), the
distance will be maximized when x1 + y1 and x1 - y1 are either
maximized or minimized.




Could someone explain in more details how this formula can be derived?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




This is from a Kickstart problem:




Note: The Manhattan distance between two squares (r1,c1) and (r2,c2)
is defined as |r1 - r2| + |c1 - c2|, where |*| operator denotes the
absolute value.




Then in the analysis:




Note that the manhattan distance has an equivalent formula:



dist((x1, y1), (x2, y2)) = max(abs(x1 + y1 - (x2 + y2)), abs(x1 - y1 - (x2 - y2)))


This formula is based on the fact that for any point, the set of
points within a manhattan distance of K form a square rotated by 45
degrees. The benefit of this formula is that if we fix (x2, y2), the
distance will be maximized when x1 + y1 and x1 - y1 are either
maximized or minimized.




Could someone explain in more details how this formula can be derived?







square-grid






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 31 at 13:07









Eugene YarmashEugene Yarmash

1334




1334







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why don't you try drawing this square, and determine what these distances represent? Hint: try to determine the coordinates of the corners of this square.
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 13:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DavidRicherby The benefit appears to be that for the specific use-case of determining whether there exists a point with distance at most $k$ to some set $S$, it seems we can do this more efficiently, as we only have to find the maximum and minimum of the points in $S$ according to $x_1+y_1$ and $x_1-y_1$ once and then can query for each point in constant time. Do you think there is an easier way to get a constant query time here?
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 13:44











  • $begingroup$
    I suppose that you could also directly look at the corners of the smallest enclosing 45 degree turned square of these points, and then you end up with basically the same values as the maxima and minima in your dataset. So, in a way, I see that changing the Manhattan distance itself could be a rather complicated way of achieving this.
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 13:51













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why don't you try drawing this square, and determine what these distances represent? Hint: try to determine the coordinates of the corners of this square.
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 13:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DavidRicherby The benefit appears to be that for the specific use-case of determining whether there exists a point with distance at most $k$ to some set $S$, it seems we can do this more efficiently, as we only have to find the maximum and minimum of the points in $S$ according to $x_1+y_1$ and $x_1-y_1$ once and then can query for each point in constant time. Do you think there is an easier way to get a constant query time here?
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 13:44











  • $begingroup$
    I suppose that you could also directly look at the corners of the smallest enclosing 45 degree turned square of these points, and then you end up with basically the same values as the maxima and minima in your dataset. So, in a way, I see that changing the Manhattan distance itself could be a rather complicated way of achieving this.
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 13:51








1




1




$begingroup$
Why don't you try drawing this square, and determine what these distances represent? Hint: try to determine the coordinates of the corners of this square.
$endgroup$
– Discrete lizard
Mar 31 at 13:32




$begingroup$
Why don't you try drawing this square, and determine what these distances represent? Hint: try to determine the coordinates of the corners of this square.
$endgroup$
– Discrete lizard
Mar 31 at 13:32




1




1




$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby The benefit appears to be that for the specific use-case of determining whether there exists a point with distance at most $k$ to some set $S$, it seems we can do this more efficiently, as we only have to find the maximum and minimum of the points in $S$ according to $x_1+y_1$ and $x_1-y_1$ once and then can query for each point in constant time. Do you think there is an easier way to get a constant query time here?
$endgroup$
– Discrete lizard
Mar 31 at 13:44





$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby The benefit appears to be that for the specific use-case of determining whether there exists a point with distance at most $k$ to some set $S$, it seems we can do this more efficiently, as we only have to find the maximum and minimum of the points in $S$ according to $x_1+y_1$ and $x_1-y_1$ once and then can query for each point in constant time. Do you think there is an easier way to get a constant query time here?
$endgroup$
– Discrete lizard
Mar 31 at 13:44













$begingroup$
I suppose that you could also directly look at the corners of the smallest enclosing 45 degree turned square of these points, and then you end up with basically the same values as the maxima and minima in your dataset. So, in a way, I see that changing the Manhattan distance itself could be a rather complicated way of achieving this.
$endgroup$
– Discrete lizard
Mar 31 at 13:51





$begingroup$
I suppose that you could also directly look at the corners of the smallest enclosing 45 degree turned square of these points, and then you end up with basically the same values as the maxima and minima in your dataset. So, in a way, I see that changing the Manhattan distance itself could be a rather complicated way of achieving this.
$endgroup$
– Discrete lizard
Mar 31 at 13:51











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Lemma. $|a|+|b|=max(|a+b|, |a-b|)$ for any real number $a$ and $b$.



Proof 1.
$|x|=max(x, -x)$ for all real number $x$. So
$$beginaligned
|a|+|b|
&=max(a, -a) + max(b, -b)\
&=max(a+b, a-b, -a+b, -a-b)\
&=max(max(a+b, -a-b), max(a-b, -(a-b))\
&=max(|a+b|, |a-b|)
endaligned$$



Proof 2.
There are $2 times 2 = 4$ cases.




  • $age 0$


    • $bgt 0$. LHS is $a+b$, RHS is $a+b$.


    • $ble 0$. LHS is $a-b$, RHS is $a-b$.



  • $alt 0$


    • $bgt 0$. LHS is $-a+b$, RHS is $-(a-b)$.


    • $ble 0$. LHS is $-a-b$, RHS is $-(a+b)$.


One dimensionality of Manhattan-distance.



The Manhattan-distance of two points $(x_1, y_1)$ and $(x_2, y_2)$ is either $|(x_1+y_1)-(x_2+y_2)|$ or $|(x_1-y_1)-(x_2-y_2)|$, whichever is larger. That is, $ d((x_1, y_1),(x_2, y_2))= max(|(x_1+y_1)-(x_2+y_2)|, |(x_1-y_1)-(x_2-y_2)|)$$



Proof: By definition,
$$d((x_1, y_1),(x_2, y_2))=|x_1-x_2| + |y_1-y_2|.$$
Now apply the lemma above. QED.



This answer also serves as a complement to another answer of mine.








share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The one dimensionality of Manhattan-distance is the main trick that is applied in the algorithm, as this allows you to sort according to this distance.
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 15:41










  • $begingroup$
    This is a great explanation, thanks. One question remains though: how is this formula based on the fact that for any point, the set of points within a manhattan distance of K form a square rotated by 45 degrees ?
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Yarmash
    Mar 31 at 16:10










  • $begingroup$
    @EugeneYarmash Let the given point be $(a,b)$. Then a point (x,y) is within $K$ M-distance of $(a,b)$ if and only if $|x+y-(a+b)|le K$ and $|x-y-(a-b)|le K$. The points defined by $|x+y-(a+b)|le K$ is between two parallel lines, $x+y=a+b+K$ and $x+y=a+b-K$, both of which are in 45 degree with the axises. The points defined by $|x-y-(a-b)|le K$ is between two parallel lines, $x-y=a-b+K$ and $x-y=a-b-K$, both of which are in 45 degree with the axises as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:26










  • $begingroup$
    @EugeneYarmash (continued) The Euclidean distance between the first two parallel lines is $sqrt 2K$, which is also the the Euclidean distance between the second two parallel lines. So we got "a square rotated by 45 degree." By the way, I am explaining the logic the other way around, that is, that fact is based on the formula! I believe, it should be better to say "this formula can be understood intuitively from the fact that ..." instead of "this formula is bases on the fact that ...".
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:32










  • $begingroup$
    Images can help understanding a lot (because the super-parallel computation done by human's eyes and brains) but could be deceiving or misleading. A mathematical proof might not be easy to come by or understand but it is much more rigorous.
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:36












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "419"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106289%2fcan-someone-explain-this-formula-for-calculating-manhattan-distance%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

Lemma. $|a|+|b|=max(|a+b|, |a-b|)$ for any real number $a$ and $b$.



Proof 1.
$|x|=max(x, -x)$ for all real number $x$. So
$$beginaligned
|a|+|b|
&=max(a, -a) + max(b, -b)\
&=max(a+b, a-b, -a+b, -a-b)\
&=max(max(a+b, -a-b), max(a-b, -(a-b))\
&=max(|a+b|, |a-b|)
endaligned$$



Proof 2.
There are $2 times 2 = 4$ cases.




  • $age 0$


    • $bgt 0$. LHS is $a+b$, RHS is $a+b$.


    • $ble 0$. LHS is $a-b$, RHS is $a-b$.



  • $alt 0$


    • $bgt 0$. LHS is $-a+b$, RHS is $-(a-b)$.


    • $ble 0$. LHS is $-a-b$, RHS is $-(a+b)$.


One dimensionality of Manhattan-distance.



The Manhattan-distance of two points $(x_1, y_1)$ and $(x_2, y_2)$ is either $|(x_1+y_1)-(x_2+y_2)|$ or $|(x_1-y_1)-(x_2-y_2)|$, whichever is larger. That is, $ d((x_1, y_1),(x_2, y_2))= max(|(x_1+y_1)-(x_2+y_2)|, |(x_1-y_1)-(x_2-y_2)|)$$



Proof: By definition,
$$d((x_1, y_1),(x_2, y_2))=|x_1-x_2| + |y_1-y_2|.$$
Now apply the lemma above. QED.



This answer also serves as a complement to another answer of mine.








share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The one dimensionality of Manhattan-distance is the main trick that is applied in the algorithm, as this allows you to sort according to this distance.
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 15:41










  • $begingroup$
    This is a great explanation, thanks. One question remains though: how is this formula based on the fact that for any point, the set of points within a manhattan distance of K form a square rotated by 45 degrees ?
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Yarmash
    Mar 31 at 16:10










  • $begingroup$
    @EugeneYarmash Let the given point be $(a,b)$. Then a point (x,y) is within $K$ M-distance of $(a,b)$ if and only if $|x+y-(a+b)|le K$ and $|x-y-(a-b)|le K$. The points defined by $|x+y-(a+b)|le K$ is between two parallel lines, $x+y=a+b+K$ and $x+y=a+b-K$, both of which are in 45 degree with the axises. The points defined by $|x-y-(a-b)|le K$ is between two parallel lines, $x-y=a-b+K$ and $x-y=a-b-K$, both of which are in 45 degree with the axises as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:26










  • $begingroup$
    @EugeneYarmash (continued) The Euclidean distance between the first two parallel lines is $sqrt 2K$, which is also the the Euclidean distance between the second two parallel lines. So we got "a square rotated by 45 degree." By the way, I am explaining the logic the other way around, that is, that fact is based on the formula! I believe, it should be better to say "this formula can be understood intuitively from the fact that ..." instead of "this formula is bases on the fact that ...".
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:32










  • $begingroup$
    Images can help understanding a lot (because the super-parallel computation done by human's eyes and brains) but could be deceiving or misleading. A mathematical proof might not be easy to come by or understand but it is much more rigorous.
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:36
















6












$begingroup$

Lemma. $|a|+|b|=max(|a+b|, |a-b|)$ for any real number $a$ and $b$.



Proof 1.
$|x|=max(x, -x)$ for all real number $x$. So
$$beginaligned
|a|+|b|
&=max(a, -a) + max(b, -b)\
&=max(a+b, a-b, -a+b, -a-b)\
&=max(max(a+b, -a-b), max(a-b, -(a-b))\
&=max(|a+b|, |a-b|)
endaligned$$



Proof 2.
There are $2 times 2 = 4$ cases.




  • $age 0$


    • $bgt 0$. LHS is $a+b$, RHS is $a+b$.


    • $ble 0$. LHS is $a-b$, RHS is $a-b$.



  • $alt 0$


    • $bgt 0$. LHS is $-a+b$, RHS is $-(a-b)$.


    • $ble 0$. LHS is $-a-b$, RHS is $-(a+b)$.


One dimensionality of Manhattan-distance.



The Manhattan-distance of two points $(x_1, y_1)$ and $(x_2, y_2)$ is either $|(x_1+y_1)-(x_2+y_2)|$ or $|(x_1-y_1)-(x_2-y_2)|$, whichever is larger. That is, $ d((x_1, y_1),(x_2, y_2))= max(|(x_1+y_1)-(x_2+y_2)|, |(x_1-y_1)-(x_2-y_2)|)$$



Proof: By definition,
$$d((x_1, y_1),(x_2, y_2))=|x_1-x_2| + |y_1-y_2|.$$
Now apply the lemma above. QED.



This answer also serves as a complement to another answer of mine.








share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The one dimensionality of Manhattan-distance is the main trick that is applied in the algorithm, as this allows you to sort according to this distance.
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 15:41










  • $begingroup$
    This is a great explanation, thanks. One question remains though: how is this formula based on the fact that for any point, the set of points within a manhattan distance of K form a square rotated by 45 degrees ?
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Yarmash
    Mar 31 at 16:10










  • $begingroup$
    @EugeneYarmash Let the given point be $(a,b)$. Then a point (x,y) is within $K$ M-distance of $(a,b)$ if and only if $|x+y-(a+b)|le K$ and $|x-y-(a-b)|le K$. The points defined by $|x+y-(a+b)|le K$ is between two parallel lines, $x+y=a+b+K$ and $x+y=a+b-K$, both of which are in 45 degree with the axises. The points defined by $|x-y-(a-b)|le K$ is between two parallel lines, $x-y=a-b+K$ and $x-y=a-b-K$, both of which are in 45 degree with the axises as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:26










  • $begingroup$
    @EugeneYarmash (continued) The Euclidean distance between the first two parallel lines is $sqrt 2K$, which is also the the Euclidean distance between the second two parallel lines. So we got "a square rotated by 45 degree." By the way, I am explaining the logic the other way around, that is, that fact is based on the formula! I believe, it should be better to say "this formula can be understood intuitively from the fact that ..." instead of "this formula is bases on the fact that ...".
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:32










  • $begingroup$
    Images can help understanding a lot (because the super-parallel computation done by human's eyes and brains) but could be deceiving or misleading. A mathematical proof might not be easy to come by or understand but it is much more rigorous.
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:36














6












6








6





$begingroup$

Lemma. $|a|+|b|=max(|a+b|, |a-b|)$ for any real number $a$ and $b$.



Proof 1.
$|x|=max(x, -x)$ for all real number $x$. So
$$beginaligned
|a|+|b|
&=max(a, -a) + max(b, -b)\
&=max(a+b, a-b, -a+b, -a-b)\
&=max(max(a+b, -a-b), max(a-b, -(a-b))\
&=max(|a+b|, |a-b|)
endaligned$$



Proof 2.
There are $2 times 2 = 4$ cases.




  • $age 0$


    • $bgt 0$. LHS is $a+b$, RHS is $a+b$.


    • $ble 0$. LHS is $a-b$, RHS is $a-b$.



  • $alt 0$


    • $bgt 0$. LHS is $-a+b$, RHS is $-(a-b)$.


    • $ble 0$. LHS is $-a-b$, RHS is $-(a+b)$.


One dimensionality of Manhattan-distance.



The Manhattan-distance of two points $(x_1, y_1)$ and $(x_2, y_2)$ is either $|(x_1+y_1)-(x_2+y_2)|$ or $|(x_1-y_1)-(x_2-y_2)|$, whichever is larger. That is, $ d((x_1, y_1),(x_2, y_2))= max(|(x_1+y_1)-(x_2+y_2)|, |(x_1-y_1)-(x_2-y_2)|)$$



Proof: By definition,
$$d((x_1, y_1),(x_2, y_2))=|x_1-x_2| + |y_1-y_2|.$$
Now apply the lemma above. QED.



This answer also serves as a complement to another answer of mine.








share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Lemma. $|a|+|b|=max(|a+b|, |a-b|)$ for any real number $a$ and $b$.



Proof 1.
$|x|=max(x, -x)$ for all real number $x$. So
$$beginaligned
|a|+|b|
&=max(a, -a) + max(b, -b)\
&=max(a+b, a-b, -a+b, -a-b)\
&=max(max(a+b, -a-b), max(a-b, -(a-b))\
&=max(|a+b|, |a-b|)
endaligned$$



Proof 2.
There are $2 times 2 = 4$ cases.




  • $age 0$


    • $bgt 0$. LHS is $a+b$, RHS is $a+b$.


    • $ble 0$. LHS is $a-b$, RHS is $a-b$.



  • $alt 0$


    • $bgt 0$. LHS is $-a+b$, RHS is $-(a-b)$.


    • $ble 0$. LHS is $-a-b$, RHS is $-(a+b)$.


One dimensionality of Manhattan-distance.



The Manhattan-distance of two points $(x_1, y_1)$ and $(x_2, y_2)$ is either $|(x_1+y_1)-(x_2+y_2)|$ or $|(x_1-y_1)-(x_2-y_2)|$, whichever is larger. That is, $ d((x_1, y_1),(x_2, y_2))= max(|(x_1+y_1)-(x_2+y_2)|, |(x_1-y_1)-(x_2-y_2)|)$$



Proof: By definition,
$$d((x_1, y_1),(x_2, y_2))=|x_1-x_2| + |y_1-y_2|.$$
Now apply the lemma above. QED.



This answer also serves as a complement to another answer of mine.









share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 31 at 14:42









Apass.JackApass.Jack

14.8k1941




14.8k1941







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The one dimensionality of Manhattan-distance is the main trick that is applied in the algorithm, as this allows you to sort according to this distance.
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 15:41










  • $begingroup$
    This is a great explanation, thanks. One question remains though: how is this formula based on the fact that for any point, the set of points within a manhattan distance of K form a square rotated by 45 degrees ?
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Yarmash
    Mar 31 at 16:10










  • $begingroup$
    @EugeneYarmash Let the given point be $(a,b)$. Then a point (x,y) is within $K$ M-distance of $(a,b)$ if and only if $|x+y-(a+b)|le K$ and $|x-y-(a-b)|le K$. The points defined by $|x+y-(a+b)|le K$ is between two parallel lines, $x+y=a+b+K$ and $x+y=a+b-K$, both of which are in 45 degree with the axises. The points defined by $|x-y-(a-b)|le K$ is between two parallel lines, $x-y=a-b+K$ and $x-y=a-b-K$, both of which are in 45 degree with the axises as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:26










  • $begingroup$
    @EugeneYarmash (continued) The Euclidean distance between the first two parallel lines is $sqrt 2K$, which is also the the Euclidean distance between the second two parallel lines. So we got "a square rotated by 45 degree." By the way, I am explaining the logic the other way around, that is, that fact is based on the formula! I believe, it should be better to say "this formula can be understood intuitively from the fact that ..." instead of "this formula is bases on the fact that ...".
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:32










  • $begingroup$
    Images can help understanding a lot (because the super-parallel computation done by human's eyes and brains) but could be deceiving or misleading. A mathematical proof might not be easy to come by or understand but it is much more rigorous.
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:36













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The one dimensionality of Manhattan-distance is the main trick that is applied in the algorithm, as this allows you to sort according to this distance.
    $endgroup$
    – Discrete lizard
    Mar 31 at 15:41










  • $begingroup$
    This is a great explanation, thanks. One question remains though: how is this formula based on the fact that for any point, the set of points within a manhattan distance of K form a square rotated by 45 degrees ?
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Yarmash
    Mar 31 at 16:10










  • $begingroup$
    @EugeneYarmash Let the given point be $(a,b)$. Then a point (x,y) is within $K$ M-distance of $(a,b)$ if and only if $|x+y-(a+b)|le K$ and $|x-y-(a-b)|le K$. The points defined by $|x+y-(a+b)|le K$ is between two parallel lines, $x+y=a+b+K$ and $x+y=a+b-K$, both of which are in 45 degree with the axises. The points defined by $|x-y-(a-b)|le K$ is between two parallel lines, $x-y=a-b+K$ and $x-y=a-b-K$, both of which are in 45 degree with the axises as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:26










  • $begingroup$
    @EugeneYarmash (continued) The Euclidean distance between the first two parallel lines is $sqrt 2K$, which is also the the Euclidean distance between the second two parallel lines. So we got "a square rotated by 45 degree." By the way, I am explaining the logic the other way around, that is, that fact is based on the formula! I believe, it should be better to say "this formula can be understood intuitively from the fact that ..." instead of "this formula is bases on the fact that ...".
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:32










  • $begingroup$
    Images can help understanding a lot (because the super-parallel computation done by human's eyes and brains) but could be deceiving or misleading. A mathematical proof might not be easy to come by or understand but it is much more rigorous.
    $endgroup$
    – Apass.Jack
    Mar 31 at 16:36








2




2




$begingroup$
The one dimensionality of Manhattan-distance is the main trick that is applied in the algorithm, as this allows you to sort according to this distance.
$endgroup$
– Discrete lizard
Mar 31 at 15:41




$begingroup$
The one dimensionality of Manhattan-distance is the main trick that is applied in the algorithm, as this allows you to sort according to this distance.
$endgroup$
– Discrete lizard
Mar 31 at 15:41












$begingroup$
This is a great explanation, thanks. One question remains though: how is this formula based on the fact that for any point, the set of points within a manhattan distance of K form a square rotated by 45 degrees ?
$endgroup$
– Eugene Yarmash
Mar 31 at 16:10




$begingroup$
This is a great explanation, thanks. One question remains though: how is this formula based on the fact that for any point, the set of points within a manhattan distance of K form a square rotated by 45 degrees ?
$endgroup$
– Eugene Yarmash
Mar 31 at 16:10












$begingroup$
@EugeneYarmash Let the given point be $(a,b)$. Then a point (x,y) is within $K$ M-distance of $(a,b)$ if and only if $|x+y-(a+b)|le K$ and $|x-y-(a-b)|le K$. The points defined by $|x+y-(a+b)|le K$ is between two parallel lines, $x+y=a+b+K$ and $x+y=a+b-K$, both of which are in 45 degree with the axises. The points defined by $|x-y-(a-b)|le K$ is between two parallel lines, $x-y=a-b+K$ and $x-y=a-b-K$, both of which are in 45 degree with the axises as well.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 31 at 16:26




$begingroup$
@EugeneYarmash Let the given point be $(a,b)$. Then a point (x,y) is within $K$ M-distance of $(a,b)$ if and only if $|x+y-(a+b)|le K$ and $|x-y-(a-b)|le K$. The points defined by $|x+y-(a+b)|le K$ is between two parallel lines, $x+y=a+b+K$ and $x+y=a+b-K$, both of which are in 45 degree with the axises. The points defined by $|x-y-(a-b)|le K$ is between two parallel lines, $x-y=a-b+K$ and $x-y=a-b-K$, both of which are in 45 degree with the axises as well.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 31 at 16:26












$begingroup$
@EugeneYarmash (continued) The Euclidean distance between the first two parallel lines is $sqrt 2K$, which is also the the Euclidean distance between the second two parallel lines. So we got "a square rotated by 45 degree." By the way, I am explaining the logic the other way around, that is, that fact is based on the formula! I believe, it should be better to say "this formula can be understood intuitively from the fact that ..." instead of "this formula is bases on the fact that ...".
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 31 at 16:32




$begingroup$
@EugeneYarmash (continued) The Euclidean distance between the first two parallel lines is $sqrt 2K$, which is also the the Euclidean distance between the second two parallel lines. So we got "a square rotated by 45 degree." By the way, I am explaining the logic the other way around, that is, that fact is based on the formula! I believe, it should be better to say "this formula can be understood intuitively from the fact that ..." instead of "this formula is bases on the fact that ...".
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 31 at 16:32












$begingroup$
Images can help understanding a lot (because the super-parallel computation done by human's eyes and brains) but could be deceiving or misleading. A mathematical proof might not be easy to come by or understand but it is much more rigorous.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 31 at 16:36





$begingroup$
Images can help understanding a lot (because the super-parallel computation done by human's eyes and brains) but could be deceiving or misleading. A mathematical proof might not be easy to come by or understand but it is much more rigorous.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
Mar 31 at 16:36


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106289%2fcan-someone-explain-this-formula-for-calculating-manhattan-distance%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Bunad

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum