Voting “wrongly.”I read it wrong / wrongly?I read it wrong / wrongly?

My first c++ game (snake console game)

Can you use "едать" and "игрывать" in the present and future tenses?

Why would a military not separate its forces into different branches?

Handling Null values (and equivalents) routinely in Python

Definition of conditional probability and a problem.

Is there a word for food that's gone 'bad', but is still edible?

How to pass hash as password to ssh server

Find magical solution to magical equation

How does the reduce() method work in Java 8?

History of the kernel of a homomorphism?

Is an HNN extension of a virtually torsion-free group virtually torsion-free?

Out of scope work duties and resignation

Where to draw the line between quantum mechanics theory and its interpretation(s)?

Can muons decay into quarks?

Why is "breaking the mould" positively connoted?

How to deal with employer who keeps me at work after working hours

What to use instead of cling film to wrap pastry

What do I do if my advisor made a mistake?

Snap victim memorial reference in Avengers: Endgame

Why wasn't the Z6 version of the Infocom Z-machine ported to the IIgs?

Has the Hulk always been able to talk?

Install LibreOffice-Writer Only not LibreOffice whole package

Latex & Markdown files

What is a common way to tell if an academic is "above average," or outstanding in their field? Is their h-index (Hirsh index) one of them?



Voting “wrongly.”


I read it wrong / wrongly?I read it wrong / wrongly?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















The title of this video is "Interview Douglas Murray (EN)" (beginning about 1:40). In it, the interviewer says: "European citizens too often vote wrongly."



At first glance, the word "wrongly" appears odd. After looking around, I couldn't find any reasons why this use would be incorrect. It's an adverb that is used in other examples, such as, "A person wrongly convicted of a crime," or "I wrongly assumed something." Even if you take "wrongly" and place it in front of the verb "voted" it still seems off. If the word "incorrectly" is substituted, the phrase seems OK: European citizens too often vote incorrectly.



Grammatically-speaking, "wrongly" can be used in this way. My question; is there another reason why this usage isn't supported? Or if it has been used before, why isn't it used more often?










share|improve this question
























  • this might help

    – Ubi hatt
    Apr 2 at 5:04











  • Does Douglas Murray actually use that phrase though, or has it come from the German media company who put the video up? I would say vote the wrong way. I don't think vote wrongly has to mean vote when they shouldn't but it can sound that way, and I think that's why we usually say I got the wrong answer or I said the wrong thing etc.

    – Minty
    Apr 2 at 6:03






  • 2





    To me "vote wrongly" implies that they have voted other than in accordance with the voting procedure. That is they have spoiled their ballot papers. Voting for a candidate or outcome the speaker does not like is not "voting wrongly" it is expressing a contrary opinion (don't get me started on Brexit). Voting for a candidate or outcome other than the one they intended to support is voting in error (and no one, probably not even the voter, would ever know). Finally voting fraudulently (Vote early vote often?) is voting illegally which is much more serious.

    – BoldBen
    Apr 2 at 9:07












  • There is nothing wrong with the expression from a syntactic point of view. "Wrong", however, can be ambiguous if not sufficiently qualified (eg, with "from a syntactic point of view"). The use of the term in the original quote is highly ambiguous and open to a vast range of interpretations, though in the context of the clip it appears to mean "for the wrong side of an issue", with the implication that the voters are uninformed.

    – Hot Licks
    Apr 2 at 12:38






  • 1





    To me "vote wrongly" sounds 'wrong' because it is ambiguous. Does it mean they "voted other than in accordance with the voting procedure" as suggested by BoldBen above? Does it mean that they voted differently from the speaker's preference; e.g. they voted 'Yes' & the speaker thought they should vote "No"?

    – TrevorD
    Apr 2 at 14:36

















3















The title of this video is "Interview Douglas Murray (EN)" (beginning about 1:40). In it, the interviewer says: "European citizens too often vote wrongly."



At first glance, the word "wrongly" appears odd. After looking around, I couldn't find any reasons why this use would be incorrect. It's an adverb that is used in other examples, such as, "A person wrongly convicted of a crime," or "I wrongly assumed something." Even if you take "wrongly" and place it in front of the verb "voted" it still seems off. If the word "incorrectly" is substituted, the phrase seems OK: European citizens too often vote incorrectly.



Grammatically-speaking, "wrongly" can be used in this way. My question; is there another reason why this usage isn't supported? Or if it has been used before, why isn't it used more often?










share|improve this question
























  • this might help

    – Ubi hatt
    Apr 2 at 5:04











  • Does Douglas Murray actually use that phrase though, or has it come from the German media company who put the video up? I would say vote the wrong way. I don't think vote wrongly has to mean vote when they shouldn't but it can sound that way, and I think that's why we usually say I got the wrong answer or I said the wrong thing etc.

    – Minty
    Apr 2 at 6:03






  • 2





    To me "vote wrongly" implies that they have voted other than in accordance with the voting procedure. That is they have spoiled their ballot papers. Voting for a candidate or outcome the speaker does not like is not "voting wrongly" it is expressing a contrary opinion (don't get me started on Brexit). Voting for a candidate or outcome other than the one they intended to support is voting in error (and no one, probably not even the voter, would ever know). Finally voting fraudulently (Vote early vote often?) is voting illegally which is much more serious.

    – BoldBen
    Apr 2 at 9:07












  • There is nothing wrong with the expression from a syntactic point of view. "Wrong", however, can be ambiguous if not sufficiently qualified (eg, with "from a syntactic point of view"). The use of the term in the original quote is highly ambiguous and open to a vast range of interpretations, though in the context of the clip it appears to mean "for the wrong side of an issue", with the implication that the voters are uninformed.

    – Hot Licks
    Apr 2 at 12:38






  • 1





    To me "vote wrongly" sounds 'wrong' because it is ambiguous. Does it mean they "voted other than in accordance with the voting procedure" as suggested by BoldBen above? Does it mean that they voted differently from the speaker's preference; e.g. they voted 'Yes' & the speaker thought they should vote "No"?

    – TrevorD
    Apr 2 at 14:36













3












3








3








The title of this video is "Interview Douglas Murray (EN)" (beginning about 1:40). In it, the interviewer says: "European citizens too often vote wrongly."



At first glance, the word "wrongly" appears odd. After looking around, I couldn't find any reasons why this use would be incorrect. It's an adverb that is used in other examples, such as, "A person wrongly convicted of a crime," or "I wrongly assumed something." Even if you take "wrongly" and place it in front of the verb "voted" it still seems off. If the word "incorrectly" is substituted, the phrase seems OK: European citizens too often vote incorrectly.



Grammatically-speaking, "wrongly" can be used in this way. My question; is there another reason why this usage isn't supported? Or if it has been used before, why isn't it used more often?










share|improve this question
















The title of this video is "Interview Douglas Murray (EN)" (beginning about 1:40). In it, the interviewer says: "European citizens too often vote wrongly."



At first glance, the word "wrongly" appears odd. After looking around, I couldn't find any reasons why this use would be incorrect. It's an adverb that is used in other examples, such as, "A person wrongly convicted of a crime," or "I wrongly assumed something." Even if you take "wrongly" and place it in front of the verb "voted" it still seems off. If the word "incorrectly" is substituted, the phrase seems OK: European citizens too often vote incorrectly.



Grammatically-speaking, "wrongly" can be used in this way. My question; is there another reason why this usage isn't supported? Or if it has been used before, why isn't it used more often?







usage






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 2 at 12:36









Hot Licks

19.8k23778




19.8k23778










asked Apr 2 at 4:39









michael_timofeevmichael_timofeev

5,80342248




5,80342248












  • this might help

    – Ubi hatt
    Apr 2 at 5:04











  • Does Douglas Murray actually use that phrase though, or has it come from the German media company who put the video up? I would say vote the wrong way. I don't think vote wrongly has to mean vote when they shouldn't but it can sound that way, and I think that's why we usually say I got the wrong answer or I said the wrong thing etc.

    – Minty
    Apr 2 at 6:03






  • 2





    To me "vote wrongly" implies that they have voted other than in accordance with the voting procedure. That is they have spoiled their ballot papers. Voting for a candidate or outcome the speaker does not like is not "voting wrongly" it is expressing a contrary opinion (don't get me started on Brexit). Voting for a candidate or outcome other than the one they intended to support is voting in error (and no one, probably not even the voter, would ever know). Finally voting fraudulently (Vote early vote often?) is voting illegally which is much more serious.

    – BoldBen
    Apr 2 at 9:07












  • There is nothing wrong with the expression from a syntactic point of view. "Wrong", however, can be ambiguous if not sufficiently qualified (eg, with "from a syntactic point of view"). The use of the term in the original quote is highly ambiguous and open to a vast range of interpretations, though in the context of the clip it appears to mean "for the wrong side of an issue", with the implication that the voters are uninformed.

    – Hot Licks
    Apr 2 at 12:38






  • 1





    To me "vote wrongly" sounds 'wrong' because it is ambiguous. Does it mean they "voted other than in accordance with the voting procedure" as suggested by BoldBen above? Does it mean that they voted differently from the speaker's preference; e.g. they voted 'Yes' & the speaker thought they should vote "No"?

    – TrevorD
    Apr 2 at 14:36

















  • this might help

    – Ubi hatt
    Apr 2 at 5:04











  • Does Douglas Murray actually use that phrase though, or has it come from the German media company who put the video up? I would say vote the wrong way. I don't think vote wrongly has to mean vote when they shouldn't but it can sound that way, and I think that's why we usually say I got the wrong answer or I said the wrong thing etc.

    – Minty
    Apr 2 at 6:03






  • 2





    To me "vote wrongly" implies that they have voted other than in accordance with the voting procedure. That is they have spoiled their ballot papers. Voting for a candidate or outcome the speaker does not like is not "voting wrongly" it is expressing a contrary opinion (don't get me started on Brexit). Voting for a candidate or outcome other than the one they intended to support is voting in error (and no one, probably not even the voter, would ever know). Finally voting fraudulently (Vote early vote often?) is voting illegally which is much more serious.

    – BoldBen
    Apr 2 at 9:07












  • There is nothing wrong with the expression from a syntactic point of view. "Wrong", however, can be ambiguous if not sufficiently qualified (eg, with "from a syntactic point of view"). The use of the term in the original quote is highly ambiguous and open to a vast range of interpretations, though in the context of the clip it appears to mean "for the wrong side of an issue", with the implication that the voters are uninformed.

    – Hot Licks
    Apr 2 at 12:38






  • 1





    To me "vote wrongly" sounds 'wrong' because it is ambiguous. Does it mean they "voted other than in accordance with the voting procedure" as suggested by BoldBen above? Does it mean that they voted differently from the speaker's preference; e.g. they voted 'Yes' & the speaker thought they should vote "No"?

    – TrevorD
    Apr 2 at 14:36
















this might help

– Ubi hatt
Apr 2 at 5:04





this might help

– Ubi hatt
Apr 2 at 5:04













Does Douglas Murray actually use that phrase though, or has it come from the German media company who put the video up? I would say vote the wrong way. I don't think vote wrongly has to mean vote when they shouldn't but it can sound that way, and I think that's why we usually say I got the wrong answer or I said the wrong thing etc.

– Minty
Apr 2 at 6:03





Does Douglas Murray actually use that phrase though, or has it come from the German media company who put the video up? I would say vote the wrong way. I don't think vote wrongly has to mean vote when they shouldn't but it can sound that way, and I think that's why we usually say I got the wrong answer or I said the wrong thing etc.

– Minty
Apr 2 at 6:03




2




2





To me "vote wrongly" implies that they have voted other than in accordance with the voting procedure. That is they have spoiled their ballot papers. Voting for a candidate or outcome the speaker does not like is not "voting wrongly" it is expressing a contrary opinion (don't get me started on Brexit). Voting for a candidate or outcome other than the one they intended to support is voting in error (and no one, probably not even the voter, would ever know). Finally voting fraudulently (Vote early vote often?) is voting illegally which is much more serious.

– BoldBen
Apr 2 at 9:07






To me "vote wrongly" implies that they have voted other than in accordance with the voting procedure. That is they have spoiled their ballot papers. Voting for a candidate or outcome the speaker does not like is not "voting wrongly" it is expressing a contrary opinion (don't get me started on Brexit). Voting for a candidate or outcome other than the one they intended to support is voting in error (and no one, probably not even the voter, would ever know). Finally voting fraudulently (Vote early vote often?) is voting illegally which is much more serious.

– BoldBen
Apr 2 at 9:07














There is nothing wrong with the expression from a syntactic point of view. "Wrong", however, can be ambiguous if not sufficiently qualified (eg, with "from a syntactic point of view"). The use of the term in the original quote is highly ambiguous and open to a vast range of interpretations, though in the context of the clip it appears to mean "for the wrong side of an issue", with the implication that the voters are uninformed.

– Hot Licks
Apr 2 at 12:38





There is nothing wrong with the expression from a syntactic point of view. "Wrong", however, can be ambiguous if not sufficiently qualified (eg, with "from a syntactic point of view"). The use of the term in the original quote is highly ambiguous and open to a vast range of interpretations, though in the context of the clip it appears to mean "for the wrong side of an issue", with the implication that the voters are uninformed.

– Hot Licks
Apr 2 at 12:38




1




1





To me "vote wrongly" sounds 'wrong' because it is ambiguous. Does it mean they "voted other than in accordance with the voting procedure" as suggested by BoldBen above? Does it mean that they voted differently from the speaker's preference; e.g. they voted 'Yes' & the speaker thought they should vote "No"?

– TrevorD
Apr 2 at 14:36





To me "vote wrongly" sounds 'wrong' because it is ambiguous. Does it mean they "voted other than in accordance with the voting procedure" as suggested by BoldBen above? Does it mean that they voted differently from the speaker's preference; e.g. they voted 'Yes' & the speaker thought they should vote "No"?

– TrevorD
Apr 2 at 14:36










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














Wrongly isn't wrong here, but someone seeing the title of the video without understanding its context might be rightly confused for two reasons: wrongly isn't an expected collocation and without the context wrongly and wrong are ambiguous.




Wrongly was not the collocation you were expecting.



Wrongly may be unexpected here because of the common use of the flat adverb form wrong. A flat adverb describes an adverb that lacks the -ly suffix that marks most adverbs derived from adjectives. The flat adverb looks indistinguishable from an adjective, which is why prescriptive grammarians in the 18th century discouraged its use. (Compare: "I ran quick" and "I ran quickly." The first is used commonly in informal speech but discouraged by many editors and grammarians in formal contexts.)



Despite such discouragement of flat adverbs in general, wrong as a flat adverb is more common than the adverb wrongly: the Corpus of Contemporary American English has instances of the adverb wrong 10125 times (out of 93754 results for wrong), and wrongly appears 1645 times.



These results suggest that wrongly would be a less expected collocation for English users. A Google search for "voted wrong" and "voted wrongly" confirms that "voted wrong" has around 25,000 results and "voted wrongly" has around 10,000. COCA has three results for "voted wrong," all in spoken situations on CNN or CBS news/current event shows. "Voted wrongly" does not appear, indicating that it might be less common in journalistic or media use. As a result, readers and listeners might expect wrong rather than wrongly and perhaps they'd even expect another adverb before wrongly. These expectations can affect initial judgments of appropriate usage.




Both wrongly and wrong have ambiguous meanings here



A given action or event can be done wrong(ly) in several ways. Did someone vote wrong(ly)



  • procedurally, that is, they mishandled the ballot in some way?


  • politically, that is, they voted for a candidate or issue that the speaker considers wrong?


  • criminally, that is, they voted when they were not eligible to vote


  • ethically, that is, they approach the act of voting in a way the speaker considers invalid or immoral


There are more possibilities. Both wrong and wrongly have issues with ambiguity, such that having this as the title of the video is less precise than using a more specific adverb or qualifying the adverb with more explanation. So why did the video preparer (Einblick) go with wrong or wrongly?




The context determines how wrong and wrongly are understood



Consider the larger context. One reason wrong/wrongly is used is because the term appears several times as an adjective and adverb to describe voting habits fairly early in the video. I type out the relevant snippets that, indeed, start at 1:40 in the above video:




(Murray) voting the wrong way, voting for the wrong parties ...



(Einblick) this is a concept of (rote?) voting wrong



(Einblick) people have developed this idea that people vote wrongly when they haven't been informed yet in a proper way




Einblick is caught up in the usage and repeats it, while Murray moves on to explicate why the claim that people vote wrong(ly) is a simplification of opponents' political arguments and issues. "Wrong" becomes one of the key charges in this discussion, but it takes listening quite carefully to both Murray and Einblick to figure out exactly how the wrongly in the video title should be taken and whether Einblick's paraphrase is correct.



It's a matter of opinion whether such a video title is enticing (people will watch because they want to know why Murray says people vote wrongly), misleading (it's unclear exactly what "wrongly" means), or both, and that uncertainty that may be at the root of your discomfort with its usage here.






share|improve this answer























  • As you said, "The first ("wrong") is used commonly in informal speech but discouraged by many editors and grammarians in formal contexts." Einblick sounds to me to have adapted BBC speech style, and the folks at BBC are known for their prescriptive formality. What's common usage in the US would not be particularly applicable.

    – Hot Licks
    Apr 3 at 11:56











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492228%2fvoting-wrongly%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














Wrongly isn't wrong here, but someone seeing the title of the video without understanding its context might be rightly confused for two reasons: wrongly isn't an expected collocation and without the context wrongly and wrong are ambiguous.




Wrongly was not the collocation you were expecting.



Wrongly may be unexpected here because of the common use of the flat adverb form wrong. A flat adverb describes an adverb that lacks the -ly suffix that marks most adverbs derived from adjectives. The flat adverb looks indistinguishable from an adjective, which is why prescriptive grammarians in the 18th century discouraged its use. (Compare: "I ran quick" and "I ran quickly." The first is used commonly in informal speech but discouraged by many editors and grammarians in formal contexts.)



Despite such discouragement of flat adverbs in general, wrong as a flat adverb is more common than the adverb wrongly: the Corpus of Contemporary American English has instances of the adverb wrong 10125 times (out of 93754 results for wrong), and wrongly appears 1645 times.



These results suggest that wrongly would be a less expected collocation for English users. A Google search for "voted wrong" and "voted wrongly" confirms that "voted wrong" has around 25,000 results and "voted wrongly" has around 10,000. COCA has three results for "voted wrong," all in spoken situations on CNN or CBS news/current event shows. "Voted wrongly" does not appear, indicating that it might be less common in journalistic or media use. As a result, readers and listeners might expect wrong rather than wrongly and perhaps they'd even expect another adverb before wrongly. These expectations can affect initial judgments of appropriate usage.




Both wrongly and wrong have ambiguous meanings here



A given action or event can be done wrong(ly) in several ways. Did someone vote wrong(ly)



  • procedurally, that is, they mishandled the ballot in some way?


  • politically, that is, they voted for a candidate or issue that the speaker considers wrong?


  • criminally, that is, they voted when they were not eligible to vote


  • ethically, that is, they approach the act of voting in a way the speaker considers invalid or immoral


There are more possibilities. Both wrong and wrongly have issues with ambiguity, such that having this as the title of the video is less precise than using a more specific adverb or qualifying the adverb with more explanation. So why did the video preparer (Einblick) go with wrong or wrongly?




The context determines how wrong and wrongly are understood



Consider the larger context. One reason wrong/wrongly is used is because the term appears several times as an adjective and adverb to describe voting habits fairly early in the video. I type out the relevant snippets that, indeed, start at 1:40 in the above video:




(Murray) voting the wrong way, voting for the wrong parties ...



(Einblick) this is a concept of (rote?) voting wrong



(Einblick) people have developed this idea that people vote wrongly when they haven't been informed yet in a proper way




Einblick is caught up in the usage and repeats it, while Murray moves on to explicate why the claim that people vote wrong(ly) is a simplification of opponents' political arguments and issues. "Wrong" becomes one of the key charges in this discussion, but it takes listening quite carefully to both Murray and Einblick to figure out exactly how the wrongly in the video title should be taken and whether Einblick's paraphrase is correct.



It's a matter of opinion whether such a video title is enticing (people will watch because they want to know why Murray says people vote wrongly), misleading (it's unclear exactly what "wrongly" means), or both, and that uncertainty that may be at the root of your discomfort with its usage here.






share|improve this answer























  • As you said, "The first ("wrong") is used commonly in informal speech but discouraged by many editors and grammarians in formal contexts." Einblick sounds to me to have adapted BBC speech style, and the folks at BBC are known for their prescriptive formality. What's common usage in the US would not be particularly applicable.

    – Hot Licks
    Apr 3 at 11:56















2














Wrongly isn't wrong here, but someone seeing the title of the video without understanding its context might be rightly confused for two reasons: wrongly isn't an expected collocation and without the context wrongly and wrong are ambiguous.




Wrongly was not the collocation you were expecting.



Wrongly may be unexpected here because of the common use of the flat adverb form wrong. A flat adverb describes an adverb that lacks the -ly suffix that marks most adverbs derived from adjectives. The flat adverb looks indistinguishable from an adjective, which is why prescriptive grammarians in the 18th century discouraged its use. (Compare: "I ran quick" and "I ran quickly." The first is used commonly in informal speech but discouraged by many editors and grammarians in formal contexts.)



Despite such discouragement of flat adverbs in general, wrong as a flat adverb is more common than the adverb wrongly: the Corpus of Contemporary American English has instances of the adverb wrong 10125 times (out of 93754 results for wrong), and wrongly appears 1645 times.



These results suggest that wrongly would be a less expected collocation for English users. A Google search for "voted wrong" and "voted wrongly" confirms that "voted wrong" has around 25,000 results and "voted wrongly" has around 10,000. COCA has three results for "voted wrong," all in spoken situations on CNN or CBS news/current event shows. "Voted wrongly" does not appear, indicating that it might be less common in journalistic or media use. As a result, readers and listeners might expect wrong rather than wrongly and perhaps they'd even expect another adverb before wrongly. These expectations can affect initial judgments of appropriate usage.




Both wrongly and wrong have ambiguous meanings here



A given action or event can be done wrong(ly) in several ways. Did someone vote wrong(ly)



  • procedurally, that is, they mishandled the ballot in some way?


  • politically, that is, they voted for a candidate or issue that the speaker considers wrong?


  • criminally, that is, they voted when they were not eligible to vote


  • ethically, that is, they approach the act of voting in a way the speaker considers invalid or immoral


There are more possibilities. Both wrong and wrongly have issues with ambiguity, such that having this as the title of the video is less precise than using a more specific adverb or qualifying the adverb with more explanation. So why did the video preparer (Einblick) go with wrong or wrongly?




The context determines how wrong and wrongly are understood



Consider the larger context. One reason wrong/wrongly is used is because the term appears several times as an adjective and adverb to describe voting habits fairly early in the video. I type out the relevant snippets that, indeed, start at 1:40 in the above video:




(Murray) voting the wrong way, voting for the wrong parties ...



(Einblick) this is a concept of (rote?) voting wrong



(Einblick) people have developed this idea that people vote wrongly when they haven't been informed yet in a proper way




Einblick is caught up in the usage and repeats it, while Murray moves on to explicate why the claim that people vote wrong(ly) is a simplification of opponents' political arguments and issues. "Wrong" becomes one of the key charges in this discussion, but it takes listening quite carefully to both Murray and Einblick to figure out exactly how the wrongly in the video title should be taken and whether Einblick's paraphrase is correct.



It's a matter of opinion whether such a video title is enticing (people will watch because they want to know why Murray says people vote wrongly), misleading (it's unclear exactly what "wrongly" means), or both, and that uncertainty that may be at the root of your discomfort with its usage here.






share|improve this answer























  • As you said, "The first ("wrong") is used commonly in informal speech but discouraged by many editors and grammarians in formal contexts." Einblick sounds to me to have adapted BBC speech style, and the folks at BBC are known for their prescriptive formality. What's common usage in the US would not be particularly applicable.

    – Hot Licks
    Apr 3 at 11:56













2












2








2







Wrongly isn't wrong here, but someone seeing the title of the video without understanding its context might be rightly confused for two reasons: wrongly isn't an expected collocation and without the context wrongly and wrong are ambiguous.




Wrongly was not the collocation you were expecting.



Wrongly may be unexpected here because of the common use of the flat adverb form wrong. A flat adverb describes an adverb that lacks the -ly suffix that marks most adverbs derived from adjectives. The flat adverb looks indistinguishable from an adjective, which is why prescriptive grammarians in the 18th century discouraged its use. (Compare: "I ran quick" and "I ran quickly." The first is used commonly in informal speech but discouraged by many editors and grammarians in formal contexts.)



Despite such discouragement of flat adverbs in general, wrong as a flat adverb is more common than the adverb wrongly: the Corpus of Contemporary American English has instances of the adverb wrong 10125 times (out of 93754 results for wrong), and wrongly appears 1645 times.



These results suggest that wrongly would be a less expected collocation for English users. A Google search for "voted wrong" and "voted wrongly" confirms that "voted wrong" has around 25,000 results and "voted wrongly" has around 10,000. COCA has three results for "voted wrong," all in spoken situations on CNN or CBS news/current event shows. "Voted wrongly" does not appear, indicating that it might be less common in journalistic or media use. As a result, readers and listeners might expect wrong rather than wrongly and perhaps they'd even expect another adverb before wrongly. These expectations can affect initial judgments of appropriate usage.




Both wrongly and wrong have ambiguous meanings here



A given action or event can be done wrong(ly) in several ways. Did someone vote wrong(ly)



  • procedurally, that is, they mishandled the ballot in some way?


  • politically, that is, they voted for a candidate or issue that the speaker considers wrong?


  • criminally, that is, they voted when they were not eligible to vote


  • ethically, that is, they approach the act of voting in a way the speaker considers invalid or immoral


There are more possibilities. Both wrong and wrongly have issues with ambiguity, such that having this as the title of the video is less precise than using a more specific adverb or qualifying the adverb with more explanation. So why did the video preparer (Einblick) go with wrong or wrongly?




The context determines how wrong and wrongly are understood



Consider the larger context. One reason wrong/wrongly is used is because the term appears several times as an adjective and adverb to describe voting habits fairly early in the video. I type out the relevant snippets that, indeed, start at 1:40 in the above video:




(Murray) voting the wrong way, voting for the wrong parties ...



(Einblick) this is a concept of (rote?) voting wrong



(Einblick) people have developed this idea that people vote wrongly when they haven't been informed yet in a proper way




Einblick is caught up in the usage and repeats it, while Murray moves on to explicate why the claim that people vote wrong(ly) is a simplification of opponents' political arguments and issues. "Wrong" becomes one of the key charges in this discussion, but it takes listening quite carefully to both Murray and Einblick to figure out exactly how the wrongly in the video title should be taken and whether Einblick's paraphrase is correct.



It's a matter of opinion whether such a video title is enticing (people will watch because they want to know why Murray says people vote wrongly), misleading (it's unclear exactly what "wrongly" means), or both, and that uncertainty that may be at the root of your discomfort with its usage here.






share|improve this answer













Wrongly isn't wrong here, but someone seeing the title of the video without understanding its context might be rightly confused for two reasons: wrongly isn't an expected collocation and without the context wrongly and wrong are ambiguous.




Wrongly was not the collocation you were expecting.



Wrongly may be unexpected here because of the common use of the flat adverb form wrong. A flat adverb describes an adverb that lacks the -ly suffix that marks most adverbs derived from adjectives. The flat adverb looks indistinguishable from an adjective, which is why prescriptive grammarians in the 18th century discouraged its use. (Compare: "I ran quick" and "I ran quickly." The first is used commonly in informal speech but discouraged by many editors and grammarians in formal contexts.)



Despite such discouragement of flat adverbs in general, wrong as a flat adverb is more common than the adverb wrongly: the Corpus of Contemporary American English has instances of the adverb wrong 10125 times (out of 93754 results for wrong), and wrongly appears 1645 times.



These results suggest that wrongly would be a less expected collocation for English users. A Google search for "voted wrong" and "voted wrongly" confirms that "voted wrong" has around 25,000 results and "voted wrongly" has around 10,000. COCA has three results for "voted wrong," all in spoken situations on CNN or CBS news/current event shows. "Voted wrongly" does not appear, indicating that it might be less common in journalistic or media use. As a result, readers and listeners might expect wrong rather than wrongly and perhaps they'd even expect another adverb before wrongly. These expectations can affect initial judgments of appropriate usage.




Both wrongly and wrong have ambiguous meanings here



A given action or event can be done wrong(ly) in several ways. Did someone vote wrong(ly)



  • procedurally, that is, they mishandled the ballot in some way?


  • politically, that is, they voted for a candidate or issue that the speaker considers wrong?


  • criminally, that is, they voted when they were not eligible to vote


  • ethically, that is, they approach the act of voting in a way the speaker considers invalid or immoral


There are more possibilities. Both wrong and wrongly have issues with ambiguity, such that having this as the title of the video is less precise than using a more specific adverb or qualifying the adverb with more explanation. So why did the video preparer (Einblick) go with wrong or wrongly?




The context determines how wrong and wrongly are understood



Consider the larger context. One reason wrong/wrongly is used is because the term appears several times as an adjective and adverb to describe voting habits fairly early in the video. I type out the relevant snippets that, indeed, start at 1:40 in the above video:




(Murray) voting the wrong way, voting for the wrong parties ...



(Einblick) this is a concept of (rote?) voting wrong



(Einblick) people have developed this idea that people vote wrongly when they haven't been informed yet in a proper way




Einblick is caught up in the usage and repeats it, while Murray moves on to explicate why the claim that people vote wrong(ly) is a simplification of opponents' political arguments and issues. "Wrong" becomes one of the key charges in this discussion, but it takes listening quite carefully to both Murray and Einblick to figure out exactly how the wrongly in the video title should be taken and whether Einblick's paraphrase is correct.



It's a matter of opinion whether such a video title is enticing (people will watch because they want to know why Murray says people vote wrongly), misleading (it's unclear exactly what "wrongly" means), or both, and that uncertainty that may be at the root of your discomfort with its usage here.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 2 at 14:52









TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin

9,0901936




9,0901936












  • As you said, "The first ("wrong") is used commonly in informal speech but discouraged by many editors and grammarians in formal contexts." Einblick sounds to me to have adapted BBC speech style, and the folks at BBC are known for their prescriptive formality. What's common usage in the US would not be particularly applicable.

    – Hot Licks
    Apr 3 at 11:56

















  • As you said, "The first ("wrong") is used commonly in informal speech but discouraged by many editors and grammarians in formal contexts." Einblick sounds to me to have adapted BBC speech style, and the folks at BBC are known for their prescriptive formality. What's common usage in the US would not be particularly applicable.

    – Hot Licks
    Apr 3 at 11:56
















As you said, "The first ("wrong") is used commonly in informal speech but discouraged by many editors and grammarians in formal contexts." Einblick sounds to me to have adapted BBC speech style, and the folks at BBC are known for their prescriptive formality. What's common usage in the US would not be particularly applicable.

– Hot Licks
Apr 3 at 11:56





As you said, "The first ("wrong") is used commonly in informal speech but discouraged by many editors and grammarians in formal contexts." Einblick sounds to me to have adapted BBC speech style, and the folks at BBC are known for their prescriptive formality. What's common usage in the US would not be particularly applicable.

– Hot Licks
Apr 3 at 11:56

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492228%2fvoting-wrongly%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029