Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?What does this component do in this series pass regulatorSeries and Parallel CircuitSimplifying Series/ Parallel RC circuitled wont turn on in series circuitHow to determine total circuit voltage and individual component resistance for a series circuitSeries parallel resistor. Circuit redrawCircuit redraw. Series and parallel resistors240v Split phase series circuitSeries RL Circuit Transient AnalysisIf the order of any component is altered in a series circuit, will the total voltage be affected?

What is the closest airport to the center of the city it serves?

Agena docking and RCS Brakes in First Man

Is 'contemporary' ambiguous and if so is there a better word?

Snap victim memorial reference in Avengers: Endgame

Python 3 - simple temperature program

Has the Hulk always been able to talk?

Why would a military not separate its forces into different branches?

Is there an age requirement to play in Adventurers League?

Side effects of Initiation by a Guru?

What was the first story to feature the plot "the monsters were human all along"?

How can I connect 2AWG cable to my 100A panel?

Out of scope work duties and resignation

Why is my arithmetic with a long long int behaving this way?

My first c++ game (snake console game)

How to ask systemd to not start a system service on boot?

Can there be a single technologically advanced nation, in a continent full of non-technologically advanced nations?

Importing a Part of the JSON

Typeset year in old-style numbers with biblatex

Why do these characters still seem to be the same age after the events of Endgame?

How is Per Object Storage Usage Calculated

To kill a cuckoo

Is disk brake effectiveness mitigated by tyres losing traction under strong braking?

Mug and wireframe entirely disappeared

History of the kernel of a homomorphism?



Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?


What does this component do in this series pass regulatorSeries and Parallel CircuitSimplifying Series/ Parallel RC circuitled wont turn on in series circuitHow to determine total circuit voltage and individual component resistance for a series circuitSeries parallel resistor. Circuit redrawCircuit redraw. Series and parallel resistors240v Split phase series circuitSeries RL Circuit Transient AnalysisIf the order of any component is altered in a series circuit, will the total voltage be affected?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.



(just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)










share|improve this question









$endgroup$


















    1












    $begingroup$


    Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.



    (just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.



      (just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.



      (just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)







      series






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 30 at 10:58









      InTheMoodForNowInTheMoodForNow

      203




      203




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$


          Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




          This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



          There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.



          • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

          • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

          • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

          • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

          • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

          • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.

          Yes/No/Maybe



          That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



          What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

          Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

          Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

          Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

          What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

          What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

          What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for this!
            $endgroup$
            – InTheMoodForNow
            Mar 30 at 16:40


















          3












          $begingroup$

          It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



          Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




          [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




          Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



          Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



          In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
            $endgroup$
            – HandyHowie
            Mar 30 at 13:35










          • $begingroup$
            That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
            $endgroup$
            – Transistor
            Mar 30 at 13:48


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
          As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
            StackExchange.schematics.init();
            );
            , "cicuitlab");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "135"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f429801%2fis-there-a-way-to-bypass-a-component-in-series-in-a-circuit-if-that-component-fa%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$


            Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




            This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



            There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.



            • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

            • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

            • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

            • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

            • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

            • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.

            Yes/No/Maybe



            That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



            What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

            Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

            Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

            Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

            What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

            What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

            What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this!
              $endgroup$
              – InTheMoodForNow
              Mar 30 at 16:40















            3












            $begingroup$


            Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




            This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



            There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.



            • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

            • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

            • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

            • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

            • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

            • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.

            Yes/No/Maybe



            That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



            What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

            Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

            Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

            Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

            What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

            What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

            What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this!
              $endgroup$
              – InTheMoodForNow
              Mar 30 at 16:40













            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$


            Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




            This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



            There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.



            • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

            • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

            • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

            • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

            • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

            • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.

            Yes/No/Maybe



            That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



            What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

            Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

            Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

            Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

            What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

            What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

            What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




            Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




            This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



            There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.



            • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

            • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

            • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

            • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

            • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

            • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.

            Yes/No/Maybe



            That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



            What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

            Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

            Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

            Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

            What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

            What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

            What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Mar 30 at 16:38









            Sunnyskyguy EE75Sunnyskyguy EE75

            72.8k228103




            72.8k228103











            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this!
              $endgroup$
              – InTheMoodForNow
              Mar 30 at 16:40
















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this!
              $endgroup$
              – InTheMoodForNow
              Mar 30 at 16:40















            $begingroup$
            Thank you for this!
            $endgroup$
            – InTheMoodForNow
            Mar 30 at 16:40




            $begingroup$
            Thank you for this!
            $endgroup$
            – InTheMoodForNow
            Mar 30 at 16:40













            3












            $begingroup$

            It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



            Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




            [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




            Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



            Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



            In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
              $endgroup$
              – HandyHowie
              Mar 30 at 13:35










            • $begingroup$
              That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
              $endgroup$
              – Transistor
              Mar 30 at 13:48















            3












            $begingroup$

            It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



            Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




            [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




            Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



            Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



            In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
              $endgroup$
              – HandyHowie
              Mar 30 at 13:35










            • $begingroup$
              That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
              $endgroup$
              – Transistor
              Mar 30 at 13:48













            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



            Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




            [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




            Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



            Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



            In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



            Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




            [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




            Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



            Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



            In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Mar 30 at 11:21









            TransistorTransistor

            90.6k788195




            90.6k788195











            • $begingroup$
              In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
              $endgroup$
              – HandyHowie
              Mar 30 at 13:35










            • $begingroup$
              That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
              $endgroup$
              – Transistor
              Mar 30 at 13:48
















            • $begingroup$
              In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
              $endgroup$
              – HandyHowie
              Mar 30 at 13:35










            • $begingroup$
              That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
              $endgroup$
              – Transistor
              Mar 30 at 13:48















            $begingroup$
            In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
            $endgroup$
            – HandyHowie
            Mar 30 at 13:35




            $begingroup$
            In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
            $endgroup$
            – HandyHowie
            Mar 30 at 13:35












            $begingroup$
            That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
            $endgroup$
            – Transistor
            Mar 30 at 13:48




            $begingroup$
            That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
            $endgroup$
            – Transistor
            Mar 30 at 13:48











            1












            $begingroup$

            Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
            As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
              As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
                As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
                As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Mar 30 at 20:35

























                answered Mar 30 at 11:11









                Sim SonSim Son

                12310




                12310



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f429801%2fis-there-a-way-to-bypass-a-component-in-series-in-a-circuit-if-that-component-fa%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                    Bunad

                    Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum