He has just been offered or he was offered





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







2















What are the differences in meaning between these two sentences:





  1. He was just offered a well-paid job with Radio Four. (Past Simple Passive)

  2. He has just been offered a well-paid job with Radio Four. (Present Perfect Passive)




Both are grammatically correct, but what are the real meaning if I use #1 / #2?










share|improve this question

























  • @PartTimer Please read through this FAQ. The questions that you have asked before should be listed on your profile page ...

    – coleopterist
    Aug 2 '12 at 9:01











  • Is this American English or British English?

    – Andrew Leach
    Aug 2 '12 at 9:26











  • This is British English. Is this the reason why both sentences have different meaning to each other?

    – Part Timer
    Aug 2 '12 at 9:39


















2















What are the differences in meaning between these two sentences:





  1. He was just offered a well-paid job with Radio Four. (Past Simple Passive)

  2. He has just been offered a well-paid job with Radio Four. (Present Perfect Passive)




Both are grammatically correct, but what are the real meaning if I use #1 / #2?










share|improve this question

























  • @PartTimer Please read through this FAQ. The questions that you have asked before should be listed on your profile page ...

    – coleopterist
    Aug 2 '12 at 9:01











  • Is this American English or British English?

    – Andrew Leach
    Aug 2 '12 at 9:26











  • This is British English. Is this the reason why both sentences have different meaning to each other?

    – Part Timer
    Aug 2 '12 at 9:39














2












2








2


1






What are the differences in meaning between these two sentences:





  1. He was just offered a well-paid job with Radio Four. (Past Simple Passive)

  2. He has just been offered a well-paid job with Radio Four. (Present Perfect Passive)




Both are grammatically correct, but what are the real meaning if I use #1 / #2?










share|improve this question
















What are the differences in meaning between these two sentences:





  1. He was just offered a well-paid job with Radio Four. (Past Simple Passive)

  2. He has just been offered a well-paid job with Radio Four. (Present Perfect Passive)




Both are grammatically correct, but what are the real meaning if I use #1 / #2?







tenses past-tense perfect-aspect






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 8 '15 at 21:29









tchrist

110k30295476




110k30295476










asked Aug 2 '12 at 8:44









Part TimerPart Timer

2093815




2093815













  • @PartTimer Please read through this FAQ. The questions that you have asked before should be listed on your profile page ...

    – coleopterist
    Aug 2 '12 at 9:01











  • Is this American English or British English?

    – Andrew Leach
    Aug 2 '12 at 9:26











  • This is British English. Is this the reason why both sentences have different meaning to each other?

    – Part Timer
    Aug 2 '12 at 9:39



















  • @PartTimer Please read through this FAQ. The questions that you have asked before should be listed on your profile page ...

    – coleopterist
    Aug 2 '12 at 9:01











  • Is this American English or British English?

    – Andrew Leach
    Aug 2 '12 at 9:26











  • This is British English. Is this the reason why both sentences have different meaning to each other?

    – Part Timer
    Aug 2 '12 at 9:39

















@PartTimer Please read through this FAQ. The questions that you have asked before should be listed on your profile page ...

– coleopterist
Aug 2 '12 at 9:01





@PartTimer Please read through this FAQ. The questions that you have asked before should be listed on your profile page ...

– coleopterist
Aug 2 '12 at 9:01













Is this American English or British English?

– Andrew Leach
Aug 2 '12 at 9:26





Is this American English or British English?

– Andrew Leach
Aug 2 '12 at 9:26













This is British English. Is this the reason why both sentences have different meaning to each other?

– Part Timer
Aug 2 '12 at 9:39





This is British English. Is this the reason why both sentences have different meaning to each other?

– Part Timer
Aug 2 '12 at 9:39










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Both are grammatically correct, but (1) is not idiomatic usage in British English.






  1. He was just offered a well-paid job with Radio Four.

  2. He has just been offered a well-paid job with Radio Four.




British English speakers might use the active form:





  1. I have just offered him a well-paid job with Radio Four.


  2. (colloq.) I just offered him that job!




I believe the reason is that He was offered connotes an event some time in the past, and contradicting that with just sounds odd. It's understood though, probably because it is used thus in American English (I believe).






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    Might not he was just offered mean he was only offered?

    – TimLymington
    Aug 2 '12 at 13:56











  • @Tim Yes, but in the context of the question which matches (1) and (2) as broadly equivalent, it doesn't :-)

    – Andrew Leach
    Aug 2 '12 at 14:00











  • I'd disagree that "He was just offered..." is not ideomatic. It's not quite as common as "He has just been offered..." but it's used often enough where I live (English North Midlands) to be familiar. To me "He was just offered..." sounds as though the offer was in the immediate past (maybe he's just come out of his performance review meeting) as opposed to "He has just been offered..." which could apply on that timescale but could also still be used a couple of days later.

    – BoldBen
    Mar 9 at 2:36



















0














"He has just been offered a well-paid job with Radio Four" sounds more recent and has the intended effect in terms of communicating the timing of the offer. It uses the right tense as the present perfect tense is used to talk about events that occurred very recently.



"He was just offered a well-paid job with Radio Four" sounds a bit awkward and doesn't effectively tell the listener about when exactly the job was offered - recently or sometime in the past.






share|improve this answer


























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f76800%2fhe-has-just-been-offered-or-he-was-offered%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    Both are grammatically correct, but (1) is not idiomatic usage in British English.






    1. He was just offered a well-paid job with Radio Four.

    2. He has just been offered a well-paid job with Radio Four.




    British English speakers might use the active form:





    1. I have just offered him a well-paid job with Radio Four.


    2. (colloq.) I just offered him that job!




    I believe the reason is that He was offered connotes an event some time in the past, and contradicting that with just sounds odd. It's understood though, probably because it is used thus in American English (I believe).






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      Might not he was just offered mean he was only offered?

      – TimLymington
      Aug 2 '12 at 13:56











    • @Tim Yes, but in the context of the question which matches (1) and (2) as broadly equivalent, it doesn't :-)

      – Andrew Leach
      Aug 2 '12 at 14:00











    • I'd disagree that "He was just offered..." is not ideomatic. It's not quite as common as "He has just been offered..." but it's used often enough where I live (English North Midlands) to be familiar. To me "He was just offered..." sounds as though the offer was in the immediate past (maybe he's just come out of his performance review meeting) as opposed to "He has just been offered..." which could apply on that timescale but could also still be used a couple of days later.

      – BoldBen
      Mar 9 at 2:36
















    3














    Both are grammatically correct, but (1) is not idiomatic usage in British English.






    1. He was just offered a well-paid job with Radio Four.

    2. He has just been offered a well-paid job with Radio Four.




    British English speakers might use the active form:





    1. I have just offered him a well-paid job with Radio Four.


    2. (colloq.) I just offered him that job!




    I believe the reason is that He was offered connotes an event some time in the past, and contradicting that with just sounds odd. It's understood though, probably because it is used thus in American English (I believe).






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      Might not he was just offered mean he was only offered?

      – TimLymington
      Aug 2 '12 at 13:56











    • @Tim Yes, but in the context of the question which matches (1) and (2) as broadly equivalent, it doesn't :-)

      – Andrew Leach
      Aug 2 '12 at 14:00











    • I'd disagree that "He was just offered..." is not ideomatic. It's not quite as common as "He has just been offered..." but it's used often enough where I live (English North Midlands) to be familiar. To me "He was just offered..." sounds as though the offer was in the immediate past (maybe he's just come out of his performance review meeting) as opposed to "He has just been offered..." which could apply on that timescale but could also still be used a couple of days later.

      – BoldBen
      Mar 9 at 2:36














    3












    3








    3







    Both are grammatically correct, but (1) is not idiomatic usage in British English.






    1. He was just offered a well-paid job with Radio Four.

    2. He has just been offered a well-paid job with Radio Four.




    British English speakers might use the active form:





    1. I have just offered him a well-paid job with Radio Four.


    2. (colloq.) I just offered him that job!




    I believe the reason is that He was offered connotes an event some time in the past, and contradicting that with just sounds odd. It's understood though, probably because it is used thus in American English (I believe).






    share|improve this answer













    Both are grammatically correct, but (1) is not idiomatic usage in British English.






    1. He was just offered a well-paid job with Radio Four.

    2. He has just been offered a well-paid job with Radio Four.




    British English speakers might use the active form:





    1. I have just offered him a well-paid job with Radio Four.


    2. (colloq.) I just offered him that job!




    I believe the reason is that He was offered connotes an event some time in the past, and contradicting that with just sounds odd. It's understood though, probably because it is used thus in American English (I believe).







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Aug 2 '12 at 11:04









    Andrew LeachAndrew Leach

    80.1k8154258




    80.1k8154258








    • 1





      Might not he was just offered mean he was only offered?

      – TimLymington
      Aug 2 '12 at 13:56











    • @Tim Yes, but in the context of the question which matches (1) and (2) as broadly equivalent, it doesn't :-)

      – Andrew Leach
      Aug 2 '12 at 14:00











    • I'd disagree that "He was just offered..." is not ideomatic. It's not quite as common as "He has just been offered..." but it's used often enough where I live (English North Midlands) to be familiar. To me "He was just offered..." sounds as though the offer was in the immediate past (maybe he's just come out of his performance review meeting) as opposed to "He has just been offered..." which could apply on that timescale but could also still be used a couple of days later.

      – BoldBen
      Mar 9 at 2:36














    • 1





      Might not he was just offered mean he was only offered?

      – TimLymington
      Aug 2 '12 at 13:56











    • @Tim Yes, but in the context of the question which matches (1) and (2) as broadly equivalent, it doesn't :-)

      – Andrew Leach
      Aug 2 '12 at 14:00











    • I'd disagree that "He was just offered..." is not ideomatic. It's not quite as common as "He has just been offered..." but it's used often enough where I live (English North Midlands) to be familiar. To me "He was just offered..." sounds as though the offer was in the immediate past (maybe he's just come out of his performance review meeting) as opposed to "He has just been offered..." which could apply on that timescale but could also still be used a couple of days later.

      – BoldBen
      Mar 9 at 2:36








    1




    1





    Might not he was just offered mean he was only offered?

    – TimLymington
    Aug 2 '12 at 13:56





    Might not he was just offered mean he was only offered?

    – TimLymington
    Aug 2 '12 at 13:56













    @Tim Yes, but in the context of the question which matches (1) and (2) as broadly equivalent, it doesn't :-)

    – Andrew Leach
    Aug 2 '12 at 14:00





    @Tim Yes, but in the context of the question which matches (1) and (2) as broadly equivalent, it doesn't :-)

    – Andrew Leach
    Aug 2 '12 at 14:00













    I'd disagree that "He was just offered..." is not ideomatic. It's not quite as common as "He has just been offered..." but it's used often enough where I live (English North Midlands) to be familiar. To me "He was just offered..." sounds as though the offer was in the immediate past (maybe he's just come out of his performance review meeting) as opposed to "He has just been offered..." which could apply on that timescale but could also still be used a couple of days later.

    – BoldBen
    Mar 9 at 2:36





    I'd disagree that "He was just offered..." is not ideomatic. It's not quite as common as "He has just been offered..." but it's used often enough where I live (English North Midlands) to be familiar. To me "He was just offered..." sounds as though the offer was in the immediate past (maybe he's just come out of his performance review meeting) as opposed to "He has just been offered..." which could apply on that timescale but could also still be used a couple of days later.

    – BoldBen
    Mar 9 at 2:36













    0














    "He has just been offered a well-paid job with Radio Four" sounds more recent and has the intended effect in terms of communicating the timing of the offer. It uses the right tense as the present perfect tense is used to talk about events that occurred very recently.



    "He was just offered a well-paid job with Radio Four" sounds a bit awkward and doesn't effectively tell the listener about when exactly the job was offered - recently or sometime in the past.






    share|improve this answer






























      0














      "He has just been offered a well-paid job with Radio Four" sounds more recent and has the intended effect in terms of communicating the timing of the offer. It uses the right tense as the present perfect tense is used to talk about events that occurred very recently.



      "He was just offered a well-paid job with Radio Four" sounds a bit awkward and doesn't effectively tell the listener about when exactly the job was offered - recently or sometime in the past.






      share|improve this answer




























        0












        0








        0







        "He has just been offered a well-paid job with Radio Four" sounds more recent and has the intended effect in terms of communicating the timing of the offer. It uses the right tense as the present perfect tense is used to talk about events that occurred very recently.



        "He was just offered a well-paid job with Radio Four" sounds a bit awkward and doesn't effectively tell the listener about when exactly the job was offered - recently or sometime in the past.






        share|improve this answer















        "He has just been offered a well-paid job with Radio Four" sounds more recent and has the intended effect in terms of communicating the timing of the offer. It uses the right tense as the present perfect tense is used to talk about events that occurred very recently.



        "He was just offered a well-paid job with Radio Four" sounds a bit awkward and doesn't effectively tell the listener about when exactly the job was offered - recently or sometime in the past.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago









        TrevorD

        10.7k22458




        10.7k22458










        answered Mar 8 at 18:15









        MikeMike

        12




        12






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f76800%2fhe-has-just-been-offered-or-he-was-offered%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Bunad

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum