Please help me to clarify which sentence is correct? Thank you in advance [on hold]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







-2















The way I do things are a little different, if this works for you, I can definitely help you.



or



The way I do things is a little different. If this works for you, I can definitely help you.



Please pay attention to the words "are" and "is", and punctuation marks.



Thank you!










share|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Dan Bron, tchrist 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1





    You have changed two things at the same time between the two sentences. (The verb form and the punctuation.) As it turns out, the second sentence gets both right. But if you're only asking about is versus are, I would keep everything else identical.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 7 at 21:35


















-2















The way I do things are a little different, if this works for you, I can definitely help you.



or



The way I do things is a little different. If this works for you, I can definitely help you.



Please pay attention to the words "are" and "is", and punctuation marks.



Thank you!










share|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by Dan Bron, tchrist 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1





    You have changed two things at the same time between the two sentences. (The verb form and the punctuation.) As it turns out, the second sentence gets both right. But if you're only asking about is versus are, I would keep everything else identical.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 7 at 21:35














-2












-2








-2








The way I do things are a little different, if this works for you, I can definitely help you.



or



The way I do things is a little different. If this works for you, I can definitely help you.



Please pay attention to the words "are" and "is", and punctuation marks.



Thank you!










share|improve this question














The way I do things are a little different, if this works for you, I can definitely help you.



or



The way I do things is a little different. If this works for you, I can definitely help you.



Please pay attention to the words "are" and "is", and punctuation marks.



Thank you!







grammar punctuation






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 7 at 15:41









SophiaSophia

12




12




put on hold as off-topic by Dan Bron, tchrist 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by Dan Bron, tchrist 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1





    You have changed two things at the same time between the two sentences. (The verb form and the punctuation.) As it turns out, the second sentence gets both right. But if you're only asking about is versus are, I would keep everything else identical.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 7 at 21:35














  • 1





    You have changed two things at the same time between the two sentences. (The verb form and the punctuation.) As it turns out, the second sentence gets both right. But if you're only asking about is versus are, I would keep everything else identical.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 7 at 21:35








1




1





You have changed two things at the same time between the two sentences. (The verb form and the punctuation.) As it turns out, the second sentence gets both right. But if you're only asking about is versus are, I would keep everything else identical.

– Jason Bassford
Mar 7 at 21:35





You have changed two things at the same time between the two sentences. (The verb form and the punctuation.) As it turns out, the second sentence gets both right. But if you're only asking about is versus are, I would keep everything else identical.

– Jason Bassford
Mar 7 at 21:35










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














It would be even better if you use "it" instead of "this" in the second sentence of the latter option. As in that option, you are referring to your way, it is advisable to prefer "it" for further clarity and certainty.



So you should say, "The way I do things is a little different. If it works for you, I can definitely help you."






share|improve this answer








New contributor




VmaX is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




























    0















    The way I do things are a little different, if this works for you, I
    can definitely help you.




    This sentence is problematic for two reasons:



    1. First, there is an issue with subject-verb agreement. With "way" being the simple subject, the verb should be "is" (3rd person singular agreemnt).



    From a structural perspective, "way" is the head of the noun phrase with the relative clause "(that) I do things" acting as a postmodifier.



    The placement of "things" next to the main verb is likely the reason for the confusion.



    2. The first sentence contains a comma splice, which is particularly confusing because of the complex sentence that follows it.



    There are three clauses, but only two complete ideas:




    • "The way I do things is* a little different"


    • "if this works for you"


    • "I can definitely help you"



    We can tell the first two clauses do not go together since if you put them together the meaning changes (and is nonsensical). There are two independent clauses and one dependent clause. We can see how they connect by trying both possible combinations.



    X "The way I do things is a little different, if this works for you."



    This makes no sense. The person only (habitually) does things differently if it works for someone else? Since this is nonsense, we can reject this combination. So let's look at the other option:



    "If this works for you, I can help you."



    The help is conditional on the person accepting the terms presented.



    So there are two complete ideas:




    1. The way I do things is a little bit different.


    2. If this works for you, I can help you.



    They either need to be separate sentences, or connected through a semicolon or by using a coordinating conjunction.






    The way I do things is a little different. If this works for you, I
    can definitely help you.




    This sentence is grammatical and has correct punctuation. It fixes the problems in the first sentence.






    share|improve this answer

































      -4














      The first sentence is a run-on. Sentences must be concise and easy to read and understand. A run-on sentence confuses readers and turns them off. Hence, the second sentence is correct as it stops after the first sentence. It also breaks the two parts of the second sentence with a comma - as it should.



      The verb here must refer to the noun "the way," because you're not talking about "things." You're talking about "the way you do things." "The way" is a singular noun. Hence, a singular verb must be used. "is" is the correct form to be used here.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        The first sentence is not a run-on; it's a comma splice—and unacceptable from any viewpoint. (Comma splices are sometime acceptable, but I can't think of a justification for this one.)

        – Jason Bassford
        Mar 7 at 21:34


















      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      It would be even better if you use "it" instead of "this" in the second sentence of the latter option. As in that option, you are referring to your way, it is advisable to prefer "it" for further clarity and certainty.



      So you should say, "The way I do things is a little different. If it works for you, I can definitely help you."






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      VmaX is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.

























        1














        It would be even better if you use "it" instead of "this" in the second sentence of the latter option. As in that option, you are referring to your way, it is advisable to prefer "it" for further clarity and certainty.



        So you should say, "The way I do things is a little different. If it works for you, I can definitely help you."






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        VmaX is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.























          1












          1








          1







          It would be even better if you use "it" instead of "this" in the second sentence of the latter option. As in that option, you are referring to your way, it is advisable to prefer "it" for further clarity and certainty.



          So you should say, "The way I do things is a little different. If it works for you, I can definitely help you."






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          VmaX is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.










          It would be even better if you use "it" instead of "this" in the second sentence of the latter option. As in that option, you are referring to your way, it is advisable to prefer "it" for further clarity and certainty.



          So you should say, "The way I do things is a little different. If it works for you, I can definitely help you."







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          VmaX is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          VmaX is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 2 days ago









          VmaXVmaX

          111




          111




          New contributor




          VmaX is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          VmaX is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          VmaX is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.

























              0















              The way I do things are a little different, if this works for you, I
              can definitely help you.




              This sentence is problematic for two reasons:



              1. First, there is an issue with subject-verb agreement. With "way" being the simple subject, the verb should be "is" (3rd person singular agreemnt).



              From a structural perspective, "way" is the head of the noun phrase with the relative clause "(that) I do things" acting as a postmodifier.



              The placement of "things" next to the main verb is likely the reason for the confusion.



              2. The first sentence contains a comma splice, which is particularly confusing because of the complex sentence that follows it.



              There are three clauses, but only two complete ideas:




              • "The way I do things is* a little different"


              • "if this works for you"


              • "I can definitely help you"



              We can tell the first two clauses do not go together since if you put them together the meaning changes (and is nonsensical). There are two independent clauses and one dependent clause. We can see how they connect by trying both possible combinations.



              X "The way I do things is a little different, if this works for you."



              This makes no sense. The person only (habitually) does things differently if it works for someone else? Since this is nonsense, we can reject this combination. So let's look at the other option:



              "If this works for you, I can help you."



              The help is conditional on the person accepting the terms presented.



              So there are two complete ideas:




              1. The way I do things is a little bit different.


              2. If this works for you, I can help you.



              They either need to be separate sentences, or connected through a semicolon or by using a coordinating conjunction.






              The way I do things is a little different. If this works for you, I
              can definitely help you.




              This sentence is grammatical and has correct punctuation. It fixes the problems in the first sentence.






              share|improve this answer






























                0















                The way I do things are a little different, if this works for you, I
                can definitely help you.




                This sentence is problematic for two reasons:



                1. First, there is an issue with subject-verb agreement. With "way" being the simple subject, the verb should be "is" (3rd person singular agreemnt).



                From a structural perspective, "way" is the head of the noun phrase with the relative clause "(that) I do things" acting as a postmodifier.



                The placement of "things" next to the main verb is likely the reason for the confusion.



                2. The first sentence contains a comma splice, which is particularly confusing because of the complex sentence that follows it.



                There are three clauses, but only two complete ideas:




                • "The way I do things is* a little different"


                • "if this works for you"


                • "I can definitely help you"



                We can tell the first two clauses do not go together since if you put them together the meaning changes (and is nonsensical). There are two independent clauses and one dependent clause. We can see how they connect by trying both possible combinations.



                X "The way I do things is a little different, if this works for you."



                This makes no sense. The person only (habitually) does things differently if it works for someone else? Since this is nonsense, we can reject this combination. So let's look at the other option:



                "If this works for you, I can help you."



                The help is conditional on the person accepting the terms presented.



                So there are two complete ideas:




                1. The way I do things is a little bit different.


                2. If this works for you, I can help you.



                They either need to be separate sentences, or connected through a semicolon or by using a coordinating conjunction.






                The way I do things is a little different. If this works for you, I
                can definitely help you.




                This sentence is grammatical and has correct punctuation. It fixes the problems in the first sentence.






                share|improve this answer




























                  0












                  0








                  0








                  The way I do things are a little different, if this works for you, I
                  can definitely help you.




                  This sentence is problematic for two reasons:



                  1. First, there is an issue with subject-verb agreement. With "way" being the simple subject, the verb should be "is" (3rd person singular agreemnt).



                  From a structural perspective, "way" is the head of the noun phrase with the relative clause "(that) I do things" acting as a postmodifier.



                  The placement of "things" next to the main verb is likely the reason for the confusion.



                  2. The first sentence contains a comma splice, which is particularly confusing because of the complex sentence that follows it.



                  There are three clauses, but only two complete ideas:




                  • "The way I do things is* a little different"


                  • "if this works for you"


                  • "I can definitely help you"



                  We can tell the first two clauses do not go together since if you put them together the meaning changes (and is nonsensical). There are two independent clauses and one dependent clause. We can see how they connect by trying both possible combinations.



                  X "The way I do things is a little different, if this works for you."



                  This makes no sense. The person only (habitually) does things differently if it works for someone else? Since this is nonsense, we can reject this combination. So let's look at the other option:



                  "If this works for you, I can help you."



                  The help is conditional on the person accepting the terms presented.



                  So there are two complete ideas:




                  1. The way I do things is a little bit different.


                  2. If this works for you, I can help you.



                  They either need to be separate sentences, or connected through a semicolon or by using a coordinating conjunction.






                  The way I do things is a little different. If this works for you, I
                  can definitely help you.




                  This sentence is grammatical and has correct punctuation. It fixes the problems in the first sentence.






                  share|improve this answer
















                  The way I do things are a little different, if this works for you, I
                  can definitely help you.




                  This sentence is problematic for two reasons:



                  1. First, there is an issue with subject-verb agreement. With "way" being the simple subject, the verb should be "is" (3rd person singular agreemnt).



                  From a structural perspective, "way" is the head of the noun phrase with the relative clause "(that) I do things" acting as a postmodifier.



                  The placement of "things" next to the main verb is likely the reason for the confusion.



                  2. The first sentence contains a comma splice, which is particularly confusing because of the complex sentence that follows it.



                  There are three clauses, but only two complete ideas:




                  • "The way I do things is* a little different"


                  • "if this works for you"


                  • "I can definitely help you"



                  We can tell the first two clauses do not go together since if you put them together the meaning changes (and is nonsensical). There are two independent clauses and one dependent clause. We can see how they connect by trying both possible combinations.



                  X "The way I do things is a little different, if this works for you."



                  This makes no sense. The person only (habitually) does things differently if it works for someone else? Since this is nonsense, we can reject this combination. So let's look at the other option:



                  "If this works for you, I can help you."



                  The help is conditional on the person accepting the terms presented.



                  So there are two complete ideas:




                  1. The way I do things is a little bit different.


                  2. If this works for you, I can help you.



                  They either need to be separate sentences, or connected through a semicolon or by using a coordinating conjunction.






                  The way I do things is a little different. If this works for you, I
                  can definitely help you.




                  This sentence is grammatical and has correct punctuation. It fixes the problems in the first sentence.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago

























                  answered 2 days ago









                  MichaelMichael

                  1855




                  1855























                      -4














                      The first sentence is a run-on. Sentences must be concise and easy to read and understand. A run-on sentence confuses readers and turns them off. Hence, the second sentence is correct as it stops after the first sentence. It also breaks the two parts of the second sentence with a comma - as it should.



                      The verb here must refer to the noun "the way," because you're not talking about "things." You're talking about "the way you do things." "The way" is a singular noun. Hence, a singular verb must be used. "is" is the correct form to be used here.






                      share|improve this answer





















                      • 1





                        The first sentence is not a run-on; it's a comma splice—and unacceptable from any viewpoint. (Comma splices are sometime acceptable, but I can't think of a justification for this one.)

                        – Jason Bassford
                        Mar 7 at 21:34
















                      -4














                      The first sentence is a run-on. Sentences must be concise and easy to read and understand. A run-on sentence confuses readers and turns them off. Hence, the second sentence is correct as it stops after the first sentence. It also breaks the two parts of the second sentence with a comma - as it should.



                      The verb here must refer to the noun "the way," because you're not talking about "things." You're talking about "the way you do things." "The way" is a singular noun. Hence, a singular verb must be used. "is" is the correct form to be used here.






                      share|improve this answer





















                      • 1





                        The first sentence is not a run-on; it's a comma splice—and unacceptable from any viewpoint. (Comma splices are sometime acceptable, but I can't think of a justification for this one.)

                        – Jason Bassford
                        Mar 7 at 21:34














                      -4












                      -4








                      -4







                      The first sentence is a run-on. Sentences must be concise and easy to read and understand. A run-on sentence confuses readers and turns them off. Hence, the second sentence is correct as it stops after the first sentence. It also breaks the two parts of the second sentence with a comma - as it should.



                      The verb here must refer to the noun "the way," because you're not talking about "things." You're talking about "the way you do things." "The way" is a singular noun. Hence, a singular verb must be used. "is" is the correct form to be used here.






                      share|improve this answer















                      The first sentence is a run-on. Sentences must be concise and easy to read and understand. A run-on sentence confuses readers and turns them off. Hence, the second sentence is correct as it stops after the first sentence. It also breaks the two parts of the second sentence with a comma - as it should.



                      The verb here must refer to the noun "the way," because you're not talking about "things." You're talking about "the way you do things." "The way" is a singular noun. Hence, a singular verb must be used. "is" is the correct form to be used here.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 2 days ago









                      TrevorD

                      10.7k22458




                      10.7k22458










                      answered Mar 7 at 15:52









                      MikeMike

                      12




                      12








                      • 1





                        The first sentence is not a run-on; it's a comma splice—and unacceptable from any viewpoint. (Comma splices are sometime acceptable, but I can't think of a justification for this one.)

                        – Jason Bassford
                        Mar 7 at 21:34














                      • 1





                        The first sentence is not a run-on; it's a comma splice—and unacceptable from any viewpoint. (Comma splices are sometime acceptable, but I can't think of a justification for this one.)

                        – Jason Bassford
                        Mar 7 at 21:34








                      1




                      1





                      The first sentence is not a run-on; it's a comma splice—and unacceptable from any viewpoint. (Comma splices are sometime acceptable, but I can't think of a justification for this one.)

                      – Jason Bassford
                      Mar 7 at 21:34





                      The first sentence is not a run-on; it's a comma splice—and unacceptable from any viewpoint. (Comma splices are sometime acceptable, but I can't think of a justification for this one.)

                      – Jason Bassford
                      Mar 7 at 21:34



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                      He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                      Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029