which is correct comparison and why?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0















Which sentence is correct and why?



1.Contrary to earlier reports I found him brighter than I during our meeting.



2.Contrary to earlier reports I found him brighter than me during our meeting.










share|improve this question

























  • Me is better than I here, unless you want to sound as though you've just arrived from 1586. It's unlikely that there were earlier reports that he was brighter than you during your meeting, so I think that part of the sentence needs rethinking.

    – Minty
    2 days ago











  • Me is not only "better" than I: me is correct and I is wrong! I is used as the subject in a sentence, but me is used as the object in a sentence: "I found him brighter than me". But you could say "I found him brighter than I was during ...".

    – TrevorD
    2 days ago













  • @TrevorD It's not really wrong - I think CGEL is right in saying if the complement of than or as can be expanded by the addition of a verb to which the pronoun is subject, then formal style has a nominative, informal style an accusative, except that formal isn't really strong enough. It's like it is I - not wrong, just outdated to the point of being comical. PS they really do mean can/could be expanded, as their examples show - they are not talking about examples like yours where it is expanded.

    – Minty
    yesterday













  • @Minty Who or what is "CGEL"?

    – TrevorD
    yesterday











  • @TrevorD en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

    – Minty
    yesterday


















0















Which sentence is correct and why?



1.Contrary to earlier reports I found him brighter than I during our meeting.



2.Contrary to earlier reports I found him brighter than me during our meeting.










share|improve this question

























  • Me is better than I here, unless you want to sound as though you've just arrived from 1586. It's unlikely that there were earlier reports that he was brighter than you during your meeting, so I think that part of the sentence needs rethinking.

    – Minty
    2 days ago











  • Me is not only "better" than I: me is correct and I is wrong! I is used as the subject in a sentence, but me is used as the object in a sentence: "I found him brighter than me". But you could say "I found him brighter than I was during ...".

    – TrevorD
    2 days ago













  • @TrevorD It's not really wrong - I think CGEL is right in saying if the complement of than or as can be expanded by the addition of a verb to which the pronoun is subject, then formal style has a nominative, informal style an accusative, except that formal isn't really strong enough. It's like it is I - not wrong, just outdated to the point of being comical. PS they really do mean can/could be expanded, as their examples show - they are not talking about examples like yours where it is expanded.

    – Minty
    yesterday













  • @Minty Who or what is "CGEL"?

    – TrevorD
    yesterday











  • @TrevorD en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

    – Minty
    yesterday














0












0








0








Which sentence is correct and why?



1.Contrary to earlier reports I found him brighter than I during our meeting.



2.Contrary to earlier reports I found him brighter than me during our meeting.










share|improve this question
















Which sentence is correct and why?



1.Contrary to earlier reports I found him brighter than I during our meeting.



2.Contrary to earlier reports I found him brighter than me during our meeting.







grammar comparison






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









TrevorD

10.7k22458




10.7k22458










asked 2 days ago









Rajeev KumarRajeev Kumar

93




93













  • Me is better than I here, unless you want to sound as though you've just arrived from 1586. It's unlikely that there were earlier reports that he was brighter than you during your meeting, so I think that part of the sentence needs rethinking.

    – Minty
    2 days ago











  • Me is not only "better" than I: me is correct and I is wrong! I is used as the subject in a sentence, but me is used as the object in a sentence: "I found him brighter than me". But you could say "I found him brighter than I was during ...".

    – TrevorD
    2 days ago













  • @TrevorD It's not really wrong - I think CGEL is right in saying if the complement of than or as can be expanded by the addition of a verb to which the pronoun is subject, then formal style has a nominative, informal style an accusative, except that formal isn't really strong enough. It's like it is I - not wrong, just outdated to the point of being comical. PS they really do mean can/could be expanded, as their examples show - they are not talking about examples like yours where it is expanded.

    – Minty
    yesterday













  • @Minty Who or what is "CGEL"?

    – TrevorD
    yesterday











  • @TrevorD en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

    – Minty
    yesterday



















  • Me is better than I here, unless you want to sound as though you've just arrived from 1586. It's unlikely that there were earlier reports that he was brighter than you during your meeting, so I think that part of the sentence needs rethinking.

    – Minty
    2 days ago











  • Me is not only "better" than I: me is correct and I is wrong! I is used as the subject in a sentence, but me is used as the object in a sentence: "I found him brighter than me". But you could say "I found him brighter than I was during ...".

    – TrevorD
    2 days ago













  • @TrevorD It's not really wrong - I think CGEL is right in saying if the complement of than or as can be expanded by the addition of a verb to which the pronoun is subject, then formal style has a nominative, informal style an accusative, except that formal isn't really strong enough. It's like it is I - not wrong, just outdated to the point of being comical. PS they really do mean can/could be expanded, as their examples show - they are not talking about examples like yours where it is expanded.

    – Minty
    yesterday













  • @Minty Who or what is "CGEL"?

    – TrevorD
    yesterday











  • @TrevorD en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

    – Minty
    yesterday

















Me is better than I here, unless you want to sound as though you've just arrived from 1586. It's unlikely that there were earlier reports that he was brighter than you during your meeting, so I think that part of the sentence needs rethinking.

– Minty
2 days ago





Me is better than I here, unless you want to sound as though you've just arrived from 1586. It's unlikely that there were earlier reports that he was brighter than you during your meeting, so I think that part of the sentence needs rethinking.

– Minty
2 days ago













Me is not only "better" than I: me is correct and I is wrong! I is used as the subject in a sentence, but me is used as the object in a sentence: "I found him brighter than me". But you could say "I found him brighter than I was during ...".

– TrevorD
2 days ago







Me is not only "better" than I: me is correct and I is wrong! I is used as the subject in a sentence, but me is used as the object in a sentence: "I found him brighter than me". But you could say "I found him brighter than I was during ...".

– TrevorD
2 days ago















@TrevorD It's not really wrong - I think CGEL is right in saying if the complement of than or as can be expanded by the addition of a verb to which the pronoun is subject, then formal style has a nominative, informal style an accusative, except that formal isn't really strong enough. It's like it is I - not wrong, just outdated to the point of being comical. PS they really do mean can/could be expanded, as their examples show - they are not talking about examples like yours where it is expanded.

– Minty
yesterday







@TrevorD It's not really wrong - I think CGEL is right in saying if the complement of than or as can be expanded by the addition of a verb to which the pronoun is subject, then formal style has a nominative, informal style an accusative, except that formal isn't really strong enough. It's like it is I - not wrong, just outdated to the point of being comical. PS they really do mean can/could be expanded, as their examples show - they are not talking about examples like yours where it is expanded.

– Minty
yesterday















@Minty Who or what is "CGEL"?

– TrevorD
yesterday





@Minty Who or what is "CGEL"?

– TrevorD
yesterday













@TrevorD en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

– Minty
yesterday





@TrevorD en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…

– Minty
yesterday










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492873%2fwhich-is-correct-comparison-and-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492873%2fwhich-is-correct-comparison-and-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

Modern approach to radio buttons

Glitch in AC sine wave interfering with phase cut dimming