How does Madhvacharya interpret Bhagavad Gita sloka 18.66?How to start reading Bhagavad Gita?Why does only Uppiliappan have “Mam Ekam Saranam Vraja” written on his hand?Does Albert Einsteen Really Read Bhagavad Gita?Prapatti-Yog (Surrender) is higher than Bhakti ,Karma & Gyan Yog?Does Bhagavad Gita detest atheists?BG 14.8 - What is the source of the scriptural definition of “mode of ignorance”?How many types of Vaishnava Charama Shloka(s) exist?Does Bhagavad Gita Sloka 17.23 refer to Brahmanas or Brahmins?How do Advaitins interpret Bhagavad Gita 7.24?What does other sects & acharyas believe in Bhagavad Gita 7.19 Sloka except Vasinava Acharayas or Sects?
Hostile Divisor Numbers
To kill a cuckoo
Install LibreOffice-Writer Only not LibreOffice whole package
Out of scope work duties and resignation
A factorization game
Why wasn't the Z6 version of the Infocom Z-machine ported to the IIgs?
Why do these characters still seem to be the same age after the events of Endgame?
Removing racism on a multi raced world
Any examples of liquids volatile at room temp but non-flammable?
What is a common way to tell if an academic is "above average," or outstanding in their field? Is their h-index (Hirsh index) one of them?
What are the advantages of luxury car brands like Acura/Lexus over their sibling non-luxury brands Honda/Toyota?
Why did the Apollo 13 crew extend the LM landing gear?
What is the closest airport to the center of the city it serves?
How long would it take for people to notice a mass disappearance?
Definition of conditional probability and a problem.
ip rule and route doesn't get respected
Is 'contemporary' ambiguous and if so is there a better word?
What do I do if my advisor made a mistake?
As a GM, is it bad form to ask for a moment to think when improvising?
Would a small hole in a Faraday cage drastically reduce its effectiveness at blocking interference?
Voltage Balun 1:1
Manager is threatening to grade me poorly if I don't complete the project
How to ask systemd to not start a system service on boot?
Is disk brake effectiveness mitigated by tyres losing traction under strong braking?
How does Madhvacharya interpret Bhagavad Gita sloka 18.66?
How to start reading Bhagavad Gita?Why does only Uppiliappan have “Mam Ekam Saranam Vraja” written on his hand?Does Albert Einsteen Really Read Bhagavad Gita?Prapatti-Yog (Surrender) is higher than Bhakti ,Karma & Gyan Yog?Does Bhagavad Gita detest atheists?BG 14.8 - What is the source of the scriptural definition of “mode of ignorance”?How many types of Vaishnava Charama Shloka(s) exist?Does Bhagavad Gita Sloka 17.23 refer to Brahmanas or Brahmins?How do Advaitins interpret Bhagavad Gita 7.24?What does other sects & acharyas believe in Bhagavad Gita 7.19 Sloka except Vasinava Acharayas or Sects?
How does Madhvacharya interpret Bhagavad Gita sloka 18.66?
18.66 sarva-dharmān parityajya
mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja
ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo
mokṣayiṣyāmi mā śucaḥ
Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reactions. Do not fear.
For example, here is how Ramanujacharya interprets it in his Bhagavad Gita commentary:
'Relinquishing all Dharmas’ — means the complete abandonment of the notion of agency,
proprietorship, results etc., in the practice of Karma, Jñāna and Bhakti Yogas which are the
means (dharmas) for attaining the highest good when done as Divine Service.
'I will release you from all sins' — means that I will free you from all obstacles that
prevent you from attaining Me; consisting of [the karmic reaction of] innumerable acts of
doing what is forbidden and neglecting what is bidden. Accumulating from beginingless
times [the reactions of] these deeds cause obstacles in spiritual development.
bhagavad-gita ramanujacharya madhvacharya
asked Mar 30 at 11:49
IkshvakuIkshvaku
1
|
show 1 more comment
How does Madhvacharya interpret Bhagavad Gita sloka 18.66?
18.66 sarva-dharmān parityajya
mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja
ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo
mokṣayiṣyāmi mā śucaḥ
Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reactions. Do not fear.
For example, here is how Ramanujacharya interprets it in his Bhagavad Gita commentary:
'Relinquishing all Dharmas’ — means the complete abandonment of the notion of agency,
proprietorship, results etc., in the practice of Karma, Jñāna and Bhakti Yogas which are the
means (dharmas) for attaining the highest good when done as Divine Service.
'I will release you from all sins' — means that I will free you from all obstacles that
prevent you from attaining Me; consisting of [the karmic reaction of] innumerable acts of
doing what is forbidden and neglecting what is bidden. Accumulating from beginingless
times [the reactions of] these deeds cause obstacles in spiritual development.
bhagavad-gita ramanujacharya madhvacharya
asked Mar 30 at 11:49
IkshvakuIkshvaku
1
bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66 Check here..
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:10
1
I think he wrote more than 1 commentary. The one shared in answer seems to be brief commentary. Otherwise how will such important shloka be commented in just 2 lines??
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:27
1
Just do a Google search.. He wrote 2 commentaries..when every one commented at length, why will madhvacharya comment in just 2 lines.. Basic common sense also. google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://… ..jump to page 3..
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:35
1
@KrishnaVarna Basic common sense is not common to all.How many Acharyas wrote two commentaries?
– commonman
Mar 30 at 16:07
1
@KrishnaVarna btw do you know the difference between commentary and subcommentary?
– commonman
Mar 30 at 16:10
|
show 1 more comment
How does Madhvacharya interpret Bhagavad Gita sloka 18.66?
18.66 sarva-dharmān parityajya
mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja
ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo
mokṣayiṣyāmi mā śucaḥ
Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reactions. Do not fear.
For example, here is how Ramanujacharya interprets it in his Bhagavad Gita commentary:
'Relinquishing all Dharmas’ — means the complete abandonment of the notion of agency,
proprietorship, results etc., in the practice of Karma, Jñāna and Bhakti Yogas which are the
means (dharmas) for attaining the highest good when done as Divine Service.
'I will release you from all sins' — means that I will free you from all obstacles that
prevent you from attaining Me; consisting of [the karmic reaction of] innumerable acts of
doing what is forbidden and neglecting what is bidden. Accumulating from beginingless
times [the reactions of] these deeds cause obstacles in spiritual development.
bhagavad-gita ramanujacharya madhvacharya
asked Mar 30 at 11:49
IkshvakuIkshvaku
1
How does Madhvacharya interpret Bhagavad Gita sloka 18.66?
18.66 sarva-dharmān parityajya
mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja
ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo
mokṣayiṣyāmi mā śucaḥ
Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reactions. Do not fear.
For example, here is how Ramanujacharya interprets it in his Bhagavad Gita commentary:
'Relinquishing all Dharmas’ — means the complete abandonment of the notion of agency,
proprietorship, results etc., in the practice of Karma, Jñāna and Bhakti Yogas which are the
means (dharmas) for attaining the highest good when done as Divine Service.
'I will release you from all sins' — means that I will free you from all obstacles that
prevent you from attaining Me; consisting of [the karmic reaction of] innumerable acts of
doing what is forbidden and neglecting what is bidden. Accumulating from beginingless
times [the reactions of] these deeds cause obstacles in spiritual development.
bhagavad-gita ramanujacharya madhvacharya
bhagavad-gita ramanujacharya madhvacharya
asked Mar 30 at 11:49
IkshvakuIkshvaku
1
asked Mar 30 at 11:49
IkshvakuIkshvaku
1
asked Mar 30 at 11:49
IkshvakuIkshvaku
1
asked Mar 30 at 11:49
IkshvakuIkshvaku
1
asked Mar 30 at 11:49
IkshvakuIkshvaku
1
1
bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66 Check here..
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:10
1
I think he wrote more than 1 commentary. The one shared in answer seems to be brief commentary. Otherwise how will such important shloka be commented in just 2 lines??
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:27
1
Just do a Google search.. He wrote 2 commentaries..when every one commented at length, why will madhvacharya comment in just 2 lines.. Basic common sense also. google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://… ..jump to page 3..
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:35
1
@KrishnaVarna Basic common sense is not common to all.How many Acharyas wrote two commentaries?
– commonman
Mar 30 at 16:07
1
@KrishnaVarna btw do you know the difference between commentary and subcommentary?
– commonman
Mar 30 at 16:10
|
show 1 more comment
bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66 Check here..
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:10
1
I think he wrote more than 1 commentary. The one shared in answer seems to be brief commentary. Otherwise how will such important shloka be commented in just 2 lines??
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:27
1
Just do a Google search.. He wrote 2 commentaries..when every one commented at length, why will madhvacharya comment in just 2 lines.. Basic common sense also. google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://… ..jump to page 3..
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:35
1
@KrishnaVarna Basic common sense is not common to all.How many Acharyas wrote two commentaries?
– commonman
Mar 30 at 16:07
1
@KrishnaVarna btw do you know the difference between commentary and subcommentary?
– commonman
Mar 30 at 16:10
bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66 Check here..
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:10
bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66 Check here..
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:10
1
1
I think he wrote more than 1 commentary. The one shared in answer seems to be brief commentary. Otherwise how will such important shloka be commented in just 2 lines??
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:27
I think he wrote more than 1 commentary. The one shared in answer seems to be brief commentary. Otherwise how will such important shloka be commented in just 2 lines??
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:27
1
1
Just do a Google search.. He wrote 2 commentaries..when every one commented at length, why will madhvacharya comment in just 2 lines.. Basic common sense also. google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://… ..jump to page 3..
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:35
Just do a Google search.. He wrote 2 commentaries..when every one commented at length, why will madhvacharya comment in just 2 lines.. Basic common sense also. google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://… ..jump to page 3..
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:35
1
1
@KrishnaVarna Basic common sense is not common to all.How many Acharyas wrote two commentaries?
– commonman
Mar 30 at 16:07
@KrishnaVarna Basic common sense is not common to all.How many Acharyas wrote two commentaries?
– commonman
Mar 30 at 16:07
1
1
@KrishnaVarna btw do you know the difference between commentary and subcommentary?
– commonman
Mar 30 at 16:10
@KrishnaVarna btw do you know the difference between commentary and subcommentary?
– commonman
Mar 30 at 16:10
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Sri Madhvacharya has written a very brief commentary
18.66।।धर्मत्यागः फलत्यागः। कथमन्यथा युद्धविधिः।यस्तु कर्मफलत्यागी स त्यागीत्यभिधीयते [18।11] इति चोक्तम्। dharmatyAgah falatyagah. katham anyathA yiddhavidhih. yastu karmafalatyAgi sa tyAgi iti abhidhiyate (Gita 18/11). eti cha uktam.
Meaning : surrending dharma means surrendering the fruits/results. Otherwise how [can one speak of] methods in the battle? He who renounces the fruits of karma is a real tyAgi, as says the Gita(18/11). And this is said.
Reference : https://www.gitasupersite.iitk.ac.in/srimad?language=dv&field_chapter_value=18&field_nsutra_value=66&scmad=1&choose=1
UPDATE
According to another website, Maddhva's commentary of the sloka is
Here Lord Krishna reveals the conclusion to the essence of all knowledge. The most confidential of all knowledge that is confidential. Sarva-dharma parityagya means renouncing all conceptions of what one thinks or imagines religiosity to be. This does not mean to renounce righteousness for righteousness to all jivas or embodied beings is always attuned and in harmony with the Supreme Lord. The ultimate goal of all religious and spiritual conceptions is communion with the Supreme Lord Krishna. To achieve this one must first have realisation of their atma or immortal soul within the etheric heart. After surrendering and taking exclusive refuge in Him alone one is blessed by the Supreme Lord and by His grace, He, Himself will accomplish this for His devotee.
Reference : https://www.bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66/
I personally however would go with the first one as I find that site to be the most authentic and it has given the original commentary in sanskrit.
According to the pdf of the entire commentary available on https://sreenivasaraos.com/tag/gita-according-to-madhva/, it is clear that MADHVA WROTE THE FIRST ONE. I am also adding what is written in the 'TAtparya-nirNaya' of the commentary as image.
answered Mar 30 at 11:59
commonmancommonman
12k1853
Thanks. Do you know what Madhvacharya thinks about the "mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja" part of the sloka?
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:02
Oh ok. Yeah Madhvas don't put much importance on this sloka like Sri Vaishnavas do.
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:05
This is different from his commentary listed on this site: bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:27
Refuse to believe what?
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:32
According to @KrishnaVarna Madhvacharya wrote 2 commentaries. Check the comments in the OP.
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:36
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sri Madhvacharya has written a very brief commentary
18.66।।धर्मत्यागः फलत्यागः। कथमन्यथा युद्धविधिः।यस्तु कर्मफलत्यागी स त्यागीत्यभिधीयते [18।11] इति चोक्तम्। dharmatyAgah falatyagah. katham anyathA yiddhavidhih. yastu karmafalatyAgi sa tyAgi iti abhidhiyate (Gita 18/11). eti cha uktam.
Meaning : surrending dharma means surrendering the fruits/results. Otherwise how [can one speak of] methods in the battle? He who renounces the fruits of karma is a real tyAgi, as says the Gita(18/11). And this is said.
Reference : https://www.gitasupersite.iitk.ac.in/srimad?language=dv&field_chapter_value=18&field_nsutra_value=66&scmad=1&choose=1
UPDATE
According to another website, Maddhva's commentary of the sloka is
Here Lord Krishna reveals the conclusion to the essence of all knowledge. The most confidential of all knowledge that is confidential. Sarva-dharma parityagya means renouncing all conceptions of what one thinks or imagines religiosity to be. This does not mean to renounce righteousness for righteousness to all jivas or embodied beings is always attuned and in harmony with the Supreme Lord. The ultimate goal of all religious and spiritual conceptions is communion with the Supreme Lord Krishna. To achieve this one must first have realisation of their atma or immortal soul within the etheric heart. After surrendering and taking exclusive refuge in Him alone one is blessed by the Supreme Lord and by His grace, He, Himself will accomplish this for His devotee.
Reference : https://www.bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66/
I personally however would go with the first one as I find that site to be the most authentic and it has given the original commentary in sanskrit.
According to the pdf of the entire commentary available on https://sreenivasaraos.com/tag/gita-according-to-madhva/, it is clear that MADHVA WROTE THE FIRST ONE. I am also adding what is written in the 'TAtparya-nirNaya' of the commentary as image.
answered Mar 30 at 11:59
commonmancommonman
12k1853
Thanks. Do you know what Madhvacharya thinks about the "mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja" part of the sloka?
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:02
Oh ok. Yeah Madhvas don't put much importance on this sloka like Sri Vaishnavas do.
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:05
This is different from his commentary listed on this site: bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:27
Refuse to believe what?
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:32
According to @KrishnaVarna Madhvacharya wrote 2 commentaries. Check the comments in the OP.
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:36
add a comment |
Sri Madhvacharya has written a very brief commentary
18.66।।धर्मत्यागः फलत्यागः। कथमन्यथा युद्धविधिः।यस्तु कर्मफलत्यागी स त्यागीत्यभिधीयते [18।11] इति चोक्तम्। dharmatyAgah falatyagah. katham anyathA yiddhavidhih. yastu karmafalatyAgi sa tyAgi iti abhidhiyate (Gita 18/11). eti cha uktam.
Meaning : surrending dharma means surrendering the fruits/results. Otherwise how [can one speak of] methods in the battle? He who renounces the fruits of karma is a real tyAgi, as says the Gita(18/11). And this is said.
Reference : https://www.gitasupersite.iitk.ac.in/srimad?language=dv&field_chapter_value=18&field_nsutra_value=66&scmad=1&choose=1
UPDATE
According to another website, Maddhva's commentary of the sloka is
Here Lord Krishna reveals the conclusion to the essence of all knowledge. The most confidential of all knowledge that is confidential. Sarva-dharma parityagya means renouncing all conceptions of what one thinks or imagines religiosity to be. This does not mean to renounce righteousness for righteousness to all jivas or embodied beings is always attuned and in harmony with the Supreme Lord. The ultimate goal of all religious and spiritual conceptions is communion with the Supreme Lord Krishna. To achieve this one must first have realisation of their atma or immortal soul within the etheric heart. After surrendering and taking exclusive refuge in Him alone one is blessed by the Supreme Lord and by His grace, He, Himself will accomplish this for His devotee.
Reference : https://www.bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66/
I personally however would go with the first one as I find that site to be the most authentic and it has given the original commentary in sanskrit.
According to the pdf of the entire commentary available on https://sreenivasaraos.com/tag/gita-according-to-madhva/, it is clear that MADHVA WROTE THE FIRST ONE. I am also adding what is written in the 'TAtparya-nirNaya' of the commentary as image.
answered Mar 30 at 11:59
commonmancommonman
12k1853
Thanks. Do you know what Madhvacharya thinks about the "mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja" part of the sloka?
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:02
Oh ok. Yeah Madhvas don't put much importance on this sloka like Sri Vaishnavas do.
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:05
This is different from his commentary listed on this site: bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:27
Refuse to believe what?
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:32
According to @KrishnaVarna Madhvacharya wrote 2 commentaries. Check the comments in the OP.
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:36
add a comment |
Sri Madhvacharya has written a very brief commentary
18.66।।धर्मत्यागः फलत्यागः। कथमन्यथा युद्धविधिः।यस्तु कर्मफलत्यागी स त्यागीत्यभिधीयते [18।11] इति चोक्तम्। dharmatyAgah falatyagah. katham anyathA yiddhavidhih. yastu karmafalatyAgi sa tyAgi iti abhidhiyate (Gita 18/11). eti cha uktam.
Meaning : surrending dharma means surrendering the fruits/results. Otherwise how [can one speak of] methods in the battle? He who renounces the fruits of karma is a real tyAgi, as says the Gita(18/11). And this is said.
Reference : https://www.gitasupersite.iitk.ac.in/srimad?language=dv&field_chapter_value=18&field_nsutra_value=66&scmad=1&choose=1
UPDATE
According to another website, Maddhva's commentary of the sloka is
Here Lord Krishna reveals the conclusion to the essence of all knowledge. The most confidential of all knowledge that is confidential. Sarva-dharma parityagya means renouncing all conceptions of what one thinks or imagines religiosity to be. This does not mean to renounce righteousness for righteousness to all jivas or embodied beings is always attuned and in harmony with the Supreme Lord. The ultimate goal of all religious and spiritual conceptions is communion with the Supreme Lord Krishna. To achieve this one must first have realisation of their atma or immortal soul within the etheric heart. After surrendering and taking exclusive refuge in Him alone one is blessed by the Supreme Lord and by His grace, He, Himself will accomplish this for His devotee.
Reference : https://www.bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66/
I personally however would go with the first one as I find that site to be the most authentic and it has given the original commentary in sanskrit.
According to the pdf of the entire commentary available on https://sreenivasaraos.com/tag/gita-according-to-madhva/, it is clear that MADHVA WROTE THE FIRST ONE. I am also adding what is written in the 'TAtparya-nirNaya' of the commentary as image.
answered Mar 30 at 11:59
commonmancommonman
12k1853
Sri Madhvacharya has written a very brief commentary
18.66।।धर्मत्यागः फलत्यागः। कथमन्यथा युद्धविधिः।यस्तु कर्मफलत्यागी स त्यागीत्यभिधीयते [18।11] इति चोक्तम्। dharmatyAgah falatyagah. katham anyathA yiddhavidhih. yastu karmafalatyAgi sa tyAgi iti abhidhiyate (Gita 18/11). eti cha uktam.
Meaning : surrending dharma means surrendering the fruits/results. Otherwise how [can one speak of] methods in the battle? He who renounces the fruits of karma is a real tyAgi, as says the Gita(18/11). And this is said.
Reference : https://www.gitasupersite.iitk.ac.in/srimad?language=dv&field_chapter_value=18&field_nsutra_value=66&scmad=1&choose=1
UPDATE
According to another website, Maddhva's commentary of the sloka is
Here Lord Krishna reveals the conclusion to the essence of all knowledge. The most confidential of all knowledge that is confidential. Sarva-dharma parityagya means renouncing all conceptions of what one thinks or imagines religiosity to be. This does not mean to renounce righteousness for righteousness to all jivas or embodied beings is always attuned and in harmony with the Supreme Lord. The ultimate goal of all religious and spiritual conceptions is communion with the Supreme Lord Krishna. To achieve this one must first have realisation of their atma or immortal soul within the etheric heart. After surrendering and taking exclusive refuge in Him alone one is blessed by the Supreme Lord and by His grace, He, Himself will accomplish this for His devotee.
Reference : https://www.bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66/
I personally however would go with the first one as I find that site to be the most authentic and it has given the original commentary in sanskrit.
According to the pdf of the entire commentary available on https://sreenivasaraos.com/tag/gita-according-to-madhva/, it is clear that MADHVA WROTE THE FIRST ONE. I am also adding what is written in the 'TAtparya-nirNaya' of the commentary as image.
answered Mar 30 at 11:59
commonmancommonman
12k1853
edited Mar 30 at 16:14
answered Mar 30 at 11:59
commonmancommonman
12k1853
answered Mar 30 at 11:59
commonmancommonman
12k1853
answered Mar 30 at 11:59
commonmancommonman
12k1853
12k1853
Thanks. Do you know what Madhvacharya thinks about the "mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja" part of the sloka?
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:02
Oh ok. Yeah Madhvas don't put much importance on this sloka like Sri Vaishnavas do.
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:05
This is different from his commentary listed on this site: bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:27
Refuse to believe what?
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:32
According to @KrishnaVarna Madhvacharya wrote 2 commentaries. Check the comments in the OP.
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:36
add a comment |
Thanks. Do you know what Madhvacharya thinks about the "mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja" part of the sloka?
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:02
Oh ok. Yeah Madhvas don't put much importance on this sloka like Sri Vaishnavas do.
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:05
This is different from his commentary listed on this site: bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:27
Refuse to believe what?
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:32
According to @KrishnaVarna Madhvacharya wrote 2 commentaries. Check the comments in the OP.
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:36
Thanks. Do you know what Madhvacharya thinks about the "mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja" part of the sloka?
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:02
Thanks. Do you know what Madhvacharya thinks about the "mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja" part of the sloka?
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:02
Oh ok. Yeah Madhvas don't put much importance on this sloka like Sri Vaishnavas do.
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:05
Oh ok. Yeah Madhvas don't put much importance on this sloka like Sri Vaishnavas do.
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:05
This is different from his commentary listed on this site: bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:27
This is different from his commentary listed on this site: bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:27
Refuse to believe what?
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:32
Refuse to believe what?
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:32
According to @KrishnaVarna Madhvacharya wrote 2 commentaries. Check the comments in the OP.
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:36
According to @KrishnaVarna Madhvacharya wrote 2 commentaries. Check the comments in the OP.
– Ikshvaku
Mar 30 at 12:36
add a comment |
bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66 Check here..
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:10
1
I think he wrote more than 1 commentary. The one shared in answer seems to be brief commentary. Otherwise how will such important shloka be commented in just 2 lines??
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:27
1
Just do a Google search.. He wrote 2 commentaries..when every one commented at length, why will madhvacharya comment in just 2 lines.. Basic common sense also. google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://… ..jump to page 3..
– Krishna Varna
Mar 30 at 12:35
1
@KrishnaVarna Basic common sense is not common to all.How many Acharyas wrote two commentaries?
– commonman
Mar 30 at 16:07
1
@KrishnaVarna btw do you know the difference between commentary and subcommentary?
– commonman
Mar 30 at 16:10