Fragmentation Level for HeapsIndex fragmentation increase as more row being deletedWhat happen when changing column type for a table with clustered index?Why index REBUILD does not reduce index fragmentatation with a page count > 1000?Different results rebuilding an index online and offlineDoes index rebuild time depend on the fragmentation level?Index rebuild - Not reducing fragmentationOnline & Offline Index RebuildMSSQL: High number of logical reads when inserting into fragmented heapNon-Unique Clustered Indexes AdministrationSQL Server hangs on index rebuild, works well after SQL service restart
Capacitor electron flow
A seasonal riddle
What do the positive and negative (+/-) transmit and receive pins mean on Ethernet cables?
Are hand made posters acceptable in Academia?
Reason why a kingside attack is not justified
Showing mass murder in a kid's book
Air travel with refrigerated insulin
How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?
Exposing a company lying about themselves in a tightly knit industry (videogames) : Is my career at risk on the long run?
Offset in split text content
Writing in a Christian voice
Not hide and seek
Would a primitive species be able to learn English from reading books alone?
PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?
Should a narrator ever describe things based on a character's view instead of facts?
How would a solely written language work mechanically
Relations between homogeneous polynomials
How do I lift the insulation blower into the attic?
Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?
Amorphous proper classes in MK
Sort with assumptions
What is the purpose of using a decision tree?
Is this saw blade faulty?
Is there any common country to visit for persons holding UK and Schengen visas?
Fragmentation Level for Heaps
Index fragmentation increase as more row being deletedWhat happen when changing column type for a table with clustered index?Why index REBUILD does not reduce index fragmentatation with a page count > 1000?Different results rebuilding an index online and offlineDoes index rebuild time depend on the fragmentation level?Index rebuild - Not reducing fragmentationOnline & Offline Index RebuildMSSQL: High number of logical reads when inserting into fragmented heapNon-Unique Clustered Indexes AdministrationSQL Server hangs on index rebuild, works well after SQL service restart
I am currently using scripts provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for executing maintenance job and of-late I have been noticing that there are many tables (heaps) fragmentation level is alarmingly high and needs to be looked and taken action upon. I checked FAQ at the site and seems his script doesn't support rebuilding heaps. I used below query to find the fragmentation level:
SELECT dbschemas.[name] as 'Schema',
dbtables.[name] as 'Table',
dbindexes.[name] as 'Index',
indexstats.alloc_unit_type_desc,
indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent,
indexstats.page_count
FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (DB_ID(), NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) AS indexstats
INNER JOIN sys.tables dbtables on dbtables.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
INNER JOIN sys.schemas dbschemas on dbtables.[schema_id] = dbschemas.[schema_id]
INNER JOIN sys.indexes AS dbindexes ON dbindexes.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
AND indexstats.index_id = dbindexes.index_id
WHERE indexstats.database_id = DB_ID() and dbindexes.name is null
ORDER BY page_count desc, indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent desc
My application is supported by vendor and I have been communicating with them to change these heaps to tables and create clustered index however it hasn't yielded any meaningful result yet since they have defined primary key as unique non-clustered index and it is also part of foreign key, so needs to change at many level before doing any change. First of all, it took many days for me to explain the difference between clustered index and primary key with unique index.
I also went through the tweaks suggested by Mr. Brent Ozar for changing the defaults at script provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for index optimize in order to make it more efficient however I didn't find any details of heap rebuilding.
As per my understanding heap's fragmentation can be handled in two ways as described here:
- To create clustered index on table and drop it - This would clear all the fragmentation and also rebuild all non-clustered index however it would be time and I/O consuming.
- Rebuilding the heap - This would also clear the fragmentation and rebuild all non-clustered index part of table rebuild.
I can't go for option 1 because I am not aware of columns where clustered index can be created and also this could take longer than option 2.
I am looking for possibility of implementing option 1 in the scripts by Ola Hallengren or alternative method for handling this. Also to add, I would like to rebuild my heaps only when the size of heap is more than 10,000 pages and fragmentation level is more than 80.
I am using Microsoft SQL Server 2014 SP3 Enterprise Edition.
As a DBA - I don't prefer to have heaps in my database however since it is vendor supported application and since they have already defined primary key as unique index and these keys are foreign keys, its very difficult to change them to clustered due to references as well as likeliness of down time.
EDIT: I went through the link provided by Mr. Erik Darling and I can confirm that I have number of heaps with forwarded records or deletes across the databases. Now, I am back to point from where I had started i.e. with those two options. As I mentioned earlier, creating clustered index is very very difficult in my scenario and will require at least months(being optimistic) with likeliness of downtime considering complex foreign key structure. Need advise on rebuilding the heaps and possible side effect.
sql-server sql-server-2014 ola-hallengren fragmentation heap
add a comment |
I am currently using scripts provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for executing maintenance job and of-late I have been noticing that there are many tables (heaps) fragmentation level is alarmingly high and needs to be looked and taken action upon. I checked FAQ at the site and seems his script doesn't support rebuilding heaps. I used below query to find the fragmentation level:
SELECT dbschemas.[name] as 'Schema',
dbtables.[name] as 'Table',
dbindexes.[name] as 'Index',
indexstats.alloc_unit_type_desc,
indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent,
indexstats.page_count
FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (DB_ID(), NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) AS indexstats
INNER JOIN sys.tables dbtables on dbtables.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
INNER JOIN sys.schemas dbschemas on dbtables.[schema_id] = dbschemas.[schema_id]
INNER JOIN sys.indexes AS dbindexes ON dbindexes.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
AND indexstats.index_id = dbindexes.index_id
WHERE indexstats.database_id = DB_ID() and dbindexes.name is null
ORDER BY page_count desc, indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent desc
My application is supported by vendor and I have been communicating with them to change these heaps to tables and create clustered index however it hasn't yielded any meaningful result yet since they have defined primary key as unique non-clustered index and it is also part of foreign key, so needs to change at many level before doing any change. First of all, it took many days for me to explain the difference between clustered index and primary key with unique index.
I also went through the tweaks suggested by Mr. Brent Ozar for changing the defaults at script provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for index optimize in order to make it more efficient however I didn't find any details of heap rebuilding.
As per my understanding heap's fragmentation can be handled in two ways as described here:
- To create clustered index on table and drop it - This would clear all the fragmentation and also rebuild all non-clustered index however it would be time and I/O consuming.
- Rebuilding the heap - This would also clear the fragmentation and rebuild all non-clustered index part of table rebuild.
I can't go for option 1 because I am not aware of columns where clustered index can be created and also this could take longer than option 2.
I am looking for possibility of implementing option 1 in the scripts by Ola Hallengren or alternative method for handling this. Also to add, I would like to rebuild my heaps only when the size of heap is more than 10,000 pages and fragmentation level is more than 80.
I am using Microsoft SQL Server 2014 SP3 Enterprise Edition.
As a DBA - I don't prefer to have heaps in my database however since it is vendor supported application and since they have already defined primary key as unique index and these keys are foreign keys, its very difficult to change them to clustered due to references as well as likeliness of down time.
EDIT: I went through the link provided by Mr. Erik Darling and I can confirm that I have number of heaps with forwarded records or deletes across the databases. Now, I am back to point from where I had started i.e. with those two options. As I mentioned earlier, creating clustered index is very very difficult in my scenario and will require at least months(being optimistic) with likeliness of downtime considering complex foreign key structure. Need advise on rebuilding the heaps and possible side effect.
sql-server sql-server-2014 ola-hallengren fragmentation heap
add a comment |
I am currently using scripts provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for executing maintenance job and of-late I have been noticing that there are many tables (heaps) fragmentation level is alarmingly high and needs to be looked and taken action upon. I checked FAQ at the site and seems his script doesn't support rebuilding heaps. I used below query to find the fragmentation level:
SELECT dbschemas.[name] as 'Schema',
dbtables.[name] as 'Table',
dbindexes.[name] as 'Index',
indexstats.alloc_unit_type_desc,
indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent,
indexstats.page_count
FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (DB_ID(), NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) AS indexstats
INNER JOIN sys.tables dbtables on dbtables.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
INNER JOIN sys.schemas dbschemas on dbtables.[schema_id] = dbschemas.[schema_id]
INNER JOIN sys.indexes AS dbindexes ON dbindexes.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
AND indexstats.index_id = dbindexes.index_id
WHERE indexstats.database_id = DB_ID() and dbindexes.name is null
ORDER BY page_count desc, indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent desc
My application is supported by vendor and I have been communicating with them to change these heaps to tables and create clustered index however it hasn't yielded any meaningful result yet since they have defined primary key as unique non-clustered index and it is also part of foreign key, so needs to change at many level before doing any change. First of all, it took many days for me to explain the difference between clustered index and primary key with unique index.
I also went through the tweaks suggested by Mr. Brent Ozar for changing the defaults at script provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for index optimize in order to make it more efficient however I didn't find any details of heap rebuilding.
As per my understanding heap's fragmentation can be handled in two ways as described here:
- To create clustered index on table and drop it - This would clear all the fragmentation and also rebuild all non-clustered index however it would be time and I/O consuming.
- Rebuilding the heap - This would also clear the fragmentation and rebuild all non-clustered index part of table rebuild.
I can't go for option 1 because I am not aware of columns where clustered index can be created and also this could take longer than option 2.
I am looking for possibility of implementing option 1 in the scripts by Ola Hallengren or alternative method for handling this. Also to add, I would like to rebuild my heaps only when the size of heap is more than 10,000 pages and fragmentation level is more than 80.
I am using Microsoft SQL Server 2014 SP3 Enterprise Edition.
As a DBA - I don't prefer to have heaps in my database however since it is vendor supported application and since they have already defined primary key as unique index and these keys are foreign keys, its very difficult to change them to clustered due to references as well as likeliness of down time.
EDIT: I went through the link provided by Mr. Erik Darling and I can confirm that I have number of heaps with forwarded records or deletes across the databases. Now, I am back to point from where I had started i.e. with those two options. As I mentioned earlier, creating clustered index is very very difficult in my scenario and will require at least months(being optimistic) with likeliness of downtime considering complex foreign key structure. Need advise on rebuilding the heaps and possible side effect.
sql-server sql-server-2014 ola-hallengren fragmentation heap
I am currently using scripts provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for executing maintenance job and of-late I have been noticing that there are many tables (heaps) fragmentation level is alarmingly high and needs to be looked and taken action upon. I checked FAQ at the site and seems his script doesn't support rebuilding heaps. I used below query to find the fragmentation level:
SELECT dbschemas.[name] as 'Schema',
dbtables.[name] as 'Table',
dbindexes.[name] as 'Index',
indexstats.alloc_unit_type_desc,
indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent,
indexstats.page_count
FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (DB_ID(), NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL) AS indexstats
INNER JOIN sys.tables dbtables on dbtables.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
INNER JOIN sys.schemas dbschemas on dbtables.[schema_id] = dbschemas.[schema_id]
INNER JOIN sys.indexes AS dbindexes ON dbindexes.[object_id] = indexstats.[object_id]
AND indexstats.index_id = dbindexes.index_id
WHERE indexstats.database_id = DB_ID() and dbindexes.name is null
ORDER BY page_count desc, indexstats.avg_fragmentation_in_percent desc
My application is supported by vendor and I have been communicating with them to change these heaps to tables and create clustered index however it hasn't yielded any meaningful result yet since they have defined primary key as unique non-clustered index and it is also part of foreign key, so needs to change at many level before doing any change. First of all, it took many days for me to explain the difference between clustered index and primary key with unique index.
I also went through the tweaks suggested by Mr. Brent Ozar for changing the defaults at script provided by Mr. Ola Hallengren for index optimize in order to make it more efficient however I didn't find any details of heap rebuilding.
As per my understanding heap's fragmentation can be handled in two ways as described here:
- To create clustered index on table and drop it - This would clear all the fragmentation and also rebuild all non-clustered index however it would be time and I/O consuming.
- Rebuilding the heap - This would also clear the fragmentation and rebuild all non-clustered index part of table rebuild.
I can't go for option 1 because I am not aware of columns where clustered index can be created and also this could take longer than option 2.
I am looking for possibility of implementing option 1 in the scripts by Ola Hallengren or alternative method for handling this. Also to add, I would like to rebuild my heaps only when the size of heap is more than 10,000 pages and fragmentation level is more than 80.
I am using Microsoft SQL Server 2014 SP3 Enterprise Edition.
As a DBA - I don't prefer to have heaps in my database however since it is vendor supported application and since they have already defined primary key as unique index and these keys are foreign keys, its very difficult to change them to clustered due to references as well as likeliness of down time.
EDIT: I went through the link provided by Mr. Erik Darling and I can confirm that I have number of heaps with forwarded records or deletes across the databases. Now, I am back to point from where I had started i.e. with those two options. As I mentioned earlier, creating clustered index is very very difficult in my scenario and will require at least months(being optimistic) with likeliness of downtime considering complex foreign key structure. Need advise on rebuilding the heaps and possible side effect.
sql-server sql-server-2014 ola-hallengren fragmentation heap
sql-server sql-server-2014 ola-hallengren fragmentation heap
edited yesterday
Learning_DBAdmin
asked 2 days ago
Learning_DBAdminLearning_DBAdmin
19712
19712
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Heaps have a few special challenges that you can't experience with clustered indexes:
- Forwarded Records
- Captive Pages
I'd suggest running sp_BlitzIndex against your database to find out if either of these things is happening with your Heaps. If not, then leave them alone. If they are, you may need to consider rebuilding them.
At this time, you can't reorganize a Heap table, and rebuilding a Heap table will also rebuild any nonclustered indexes on it. It may be cheaper to drop them, rebuild the Heap table, and then recreate the nonclustered indexes afterwards.
You can read more about this stuff here:
- sp_BlitzIndex Self Loathing Indexes
- How To Fix Forwarded Records
- Mysterious Forwarded Records
- Forwarded Fetches and Bookmark Lookups
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f232357%2ffragmentation-level-for-heaps%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Heaps have a few special challenges that you can't experience with clustered indexes:
- Forwarded Records
- Captive Pages
I'd suggest running sp_BlitzIndex against your database to find out if either of these things is happening with your Heaps. If not, then leave them alone. If they are, you may need to consider rebuilding them.
At this time, you can't reorganize a Heap table, and rebuilding a Heap table will also rebuild any nonclustered indexes on it. It may be cheaper to drop them, rebuild the Heap table, and then recreate the nonclustered indexes afterwards.
You can read more about this stuff here:
- sp_BlitzIndex Self Loathing Indexes
- How To Fix Forwarded Records
- Mysterious Forwarded Records
- Forwarded Fetches and Bookmark Lookups
add a comment |
Heaps have a few special challenges that you can't experience with clustered indexes:
- Forwarded Records
- Captive Pages
I'd suggest running sp_BlitzIndex against your database to find out if either of these things is happening with your Heaps. If not, then leave them alone. If they are, you may need to consider rebuilding them.
At this time, you can't reorganize a Heap table, and rebuilding a Heap table will also rebuild any nonclustered indexes on it. It may be cheaper to drop them, rebuild the Heap table, and then recreate the nonclustered indexes afterwards.
You can read more about this stuff here:
- sp_BlitzIndex Self Loathing Indexes
- How To Fix Forwarded Records
- Mysterious Forwarded Records
- Forwarded Fetches and Bookmark Lookups
add a comment |
Heaps have a few special challenges that you can't experience with clustered indexes:
- Forwarded Records
- Captive Pages
I'd suggest running sp_BlitzIndex against your database to find out if either of these things is happening with your Heaps. If not, then leave them alone. If they are, you may need to consider rebuilding them.
At this time, you can't reorganize a Heap table, and rebuilding a Heap table will also rebuild any nonclustered indexes on it. It may be cheaper to drop them, rebuild the Heap table, and then recreate the nonclustered indexes afterwards.
You can read more about this stuff here:
- sp_BlitzIndex Self Loathing Indexes
- How To Fix Forwarded Records
- Mysterious Forwarded Records
- Forwarded Fetches and Bookmark Lookups
Heaps have a few special challenges that you can't experience with clustered indexes:
- Forwarded Records
- Captive Pages
I'd suggest running sp_BlitzIndex against your database to find out if either of these things is happening with your Heaps. If not, then leave them alone. If they are, you may need to consider rebuilding them.
At this time, you can't reorganize a Heap table, and rebuilding a Heap table will also rebuild any nonclustered indexes on it. It may be cheaper to drop them, rebuild the Heap table, and then recreate the nonclustered indexes afterwards.
You can read more about this stuff here:
- sp_BlitzIndex Self Loathing Indexes
- How To Fix Forwarded Records
- Mysterious Forwarded Records
- Forwarded Fetches and Bookmark Lookups
edited 2 days ago
Joe Obbish
21.3k43187
21.3k43187
answered 2 days ago
Erik DarlingErik Darling
21.6k1267108
21.6k1267108
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f232357%2ffragmentation-level-for-heaps%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown