Use of paid as adjectiveWhat tenses should I use in clauses joined by “so”?for the comparison - basic or comparative adjective?What's wrong with this separation between a relative clause and the adjective?How can 'important', an adjective, modify an entire clause? Why not an adverb?adjective with from…toCan relative pronouns and clauses follow demonstrative determiners?Which is the correct one between these sentences?Poorly explained usage of grammar constructionIs “presently present” grammatically correct?The way of using ''with honey color '' in sentence below
Would this string work as string?
Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bosendorfer?
Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?
Rendered textures different to 3D View
Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?
What properties make a magic weapon befit a Rogue more than a DEX-based Fighter?
What should be the ideal length of sentences in a blog post for ease of reading?
Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup
Recursively move files within sub directories
Not hide and seek
How to get directions in deep space?
Error in master's thesis, I do not know what to do
How do you say "Trust your struggle." in French?
Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?
How can a new country break out from a developed country without war?
Should a narrator ever describe things based on a character's view instead of facts?
Travelling in US for more than 90 days
Derivative of an interpolated function
Magnifying glass in hyperbolic space
categorizing a variable turns it from insignificant to significant
Mortal danger in mid-grade literature
Capacitor electron flow
Why is implicit conversion not ambiguous for non-primitive types?
What is it called when someone votes for an option that's not their first choice?
Use of paid as adjective
What tenses should I use in clauses joined by “so”?for the comparison - basic or comparative adjective?What's wrong with this separation between a relative clause and the adjective?How can 'important', an adjective, modify an entire clause? Why not an adverb?adjective with from…toCan relative pronouns and clauses follow demonstrative determiners?Which is the correct one between these sentences?Poorly explained usage of grammar constructionIs “presently present” grammatically correct?The way of using ''with honey color '' in sentence below
Can i use “paid” as an adjective while indicating an amount as is the case with the sentence below ?
Plastic bag will be paid by 25 cent .
Or would it be better to say:
Plastic bags will be charged at 25 cent.
grammaticality
asked 2 days ago
language learnerlanguage learner
614
add a comment |
Can i use “paid” as an adjective while indicating an amount as is the case with the sentence below ?
Plastic bag will be paid by 25 cent .
Or would it be better to say:
Plastic bags will be charged at 25 cent.
grammaticality
asked 2 days ago
language learnerlanguage learner
614
add a comment |
Can i use “paid” as an adjective while indicating an amount as is the case with the sentence below ?
Plastic bag will be paid by 25 cent .
Or would it be better to say:
Plastic bags will be charged at 25 cent.
grammaticality
asked 2 days ago
language learnerlanguage learner
614
Can i use “paid” as an adjective while indicating an amount as is the case with the sentence below ?
Plastic bag will be paid by 25 cent .
Or would it be better to say:
Plastic bags will be charged at 25 cent.
grammaticality
grammaticality
asked 2 days ago
language learnerlanguage learner
614
asked 2 days ago
language learnerlanguage learner
614
edited 2 days ago
language learner
asked 2 days ago
language learnerlanguage learner
614
asked 2 days ago
language learnerlanguage learner
614
asked 2 days ago
language learnerlanguage learner
614
614
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:
In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.
In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.
answered 2 days ago
MixolydianMixolydian
3,581512
add a comment |
Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.
However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.
The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.
Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.
That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.
Try:
There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.
You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.
There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.
answered 2 days ago
SamBCSamBC
13k1748
Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.
– language learner
2 days ago
Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".
– SamBC
2 days ago
1
@languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".
– alephzero
2 days ago
It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.
– Mixolydian
2 days ago
1
I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.
– SamBC
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200941%2fuse-of-paid-as-adjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:
In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.
In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.
answered 2 days ago
MixolydianMixolydian
3,581512
add a comment |
Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:
In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.
In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.
answered 2 days ago
MixolydianMixolydian
3,581512
add a comment |
Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:
In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.
In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.
answered 2 days ago
MixolydianMixolydian
3,581512
Neither sentence is grammatical, though I think I understand what you’re asking. Either charge or cost or pay would be an appropriate word here, and each one can be used as follows:
In four months they will charge 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months customers will be charged 25 cents per plastic bag.
In four months it will cost 25 cents to get a plastic bag.
In four months customers will have to pay 25 cents per plastic bag.
answered 2 days ago
MixolydianMixolydian
3,581512
answered 2 days ago
MixolydianMixolydian
3,581512
answered 2 days ago
MixolydianMixolydian
3,581512
answered 2 days ago
MixolydianMixolydian
3,581512
3,581512
add a comment |
add a comment |
Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.
However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.
The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.
Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.
That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.
Try:
There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.
You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.
There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.
answered 2 days ago
SamBCSamBC
13k1748
Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.
– language learner
2 days ago
Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".
– SamBC
2 days ago
1
@languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".
– alephzero
2 days ago
It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.
– Mixolydian
2 days ago
1
I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.
– SamBC
2 days ago
add a comment |
Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.
However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.
The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.
Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.
That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.
Try:
There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.
You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.
There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.
answered 2 days ago
SamBCSamBC
13k1748
Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.
– language learner
2 days ago
Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".
– SamBC
2 days ago
1
@languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".
– alephzero
2 days ago
It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.
– Mixolydian
2 days ago
1
I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.
– SamBC
2 days ago
add a comment |
Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.
However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.
The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.
Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.
That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.
Try:
There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.
You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.
There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.
answered 2 days ago
SamBCSamBC
13k1748
Paid can be an adjective, used in contrast to unpaid - for example, you might be looking for paid work.
However, your suggested sentence doesn't use paid correctly. Paid by is saying that 25 cents will pay the bag. No-one is paying the bags everything. It would also still be a verb, in passive voice.
The usage of charged in your second example is something you might hear in general usage. Properly, it is a verb, and it should be "will be charged for". No dictionary I've found admits an adjective use of charged in that sense. However, usage in some dialects drops the for so charged ends up looking like an adjective. It isn't. Charged is only an adjective in reference to electrical charge - and then other things by analogy to electrical charge.
Plastic bags will be charged for, at 25 cents.
That works, but it's clunky and shouldn't be used formally because it just sounds like you didn't think about it properly.
Try:
There will be a charge of 25 cents per plastic bag.
You will have to pay 25 cents for each plastic bag.
There are other options, of course. A bewildering array. It's not a good place for using the passive voice, though.
answered 2 days ago
SamBCSamBC
13k1748
answered 2 days ago
SamBCSamBC
13k1748
answered 2 days ago
SamBCSamBC
13k1748
answered 2 days ago
SamBCSamBC
13k1748
13k1748
Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.
– language learner
2 days ago
Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".
– SamBC
2 days ago
1
@languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".
– alephzero
2 days ago
It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.
– Mixolydian
2 days ago
1
I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.
– SamBC
2 days ago
add a comment |
Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.
– language learner
2 days ago
Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".
– SamBC
2 days ago
1
@languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".
– alephzero
2 days ago
It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.
– Mixolydian
2 days ago
1
I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.
– SamBC
2 days ago
Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.
– language learner
2 days ago
Actually what i want to ask is that ; while downloading an app it says : for free for one month then for $5 per month. I wonder what the context is before “ for $5 per month”.
– language learner
2 days ago
Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".
– SamBC
2 days ago
Trying to work out what the elision is there is tough. You obviously know what they mean, but they have said it very well. I would say "Free to use for your first month, costs £5 per month thereafter".
– SamBC
2 days ago
1
1
@languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".
– alephzero
2 days ago
@languagelearner The elision is something like "You can use the app for free for one month, then for $5 per month". "You can use it for free" is informal English, and the "for" just emphasizes the "free". It would be more formal to say "You can use it free for one month..." without the "for".
– alephzero
2 days ago
It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.
– Mixolydian
2 days ago
It is true that you can use paid as the opposite of free- but I think you can only use it for less tangible things- “paid software,” “paid app,” “paid service”. You cannot say “paid bag”.
– Mixolydian
2 days ago
1
1
I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.
– SamBC
2 days ago
I didn't even think of it as an antonym for free, just for unpaid, which are used for different things. Yes, it can sometimes be an antonym for free, but not always. Tangible/intangible might be the deciding factor.
– SamBC
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200941%2fuse-of-paid-as-adjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
